"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
From a reader…
Loading ...
That dirt bowl should be tossed into the Pachamama Swimming Hole (known colloquially as the Tiber).
Although I’m not a priest, I consulted St. Thomas and wanted to share my findings. I think it would be interesting to tease out what, psychologically speaking, is going on. But first, St. Thomas:
“…the species of superstition are differentiated, first on the part of the mode, secondly on the part of the object. For the divine worship may be given either to whom it ought to be given, namely, to the true God, but “in an undue mode,” and this is the first species of superstition; or to whom it ought not to be given, namely, to any creature whatsoever, and this is another genus of superstition, divided into many species in respect of the various ends of divine worship. For the end of divine worship is in the first place to give reverence to God, and in this respect the first species of this genus is “idolatry,” which unduly gives divine honor to a creature. The second end of religion is that man may be taught by God Whom he worships; and to this must be referred “divinatory” superstition, which consults the demons through compacts made with them, whether tacit or explicit. Thirdly, the end of divine worship is a certain direction of human acts according to the precepts of God the object of that worship: and to this must be referred the superstition of certain “observances.”
Augustine alludes to these three (De Doctr. Christ. ii, 20), where he says that “anything invented by man for making and worshipping idols is superstitious,” and this refers to the first species. Then he goes on to say, “or any agreement or covenant made with the demons for the purpose of consultation and of compact by tokens,” which refers to the second species; and a little further on he adds: “To this kind belong all sorts of amulets and such like,” and this refers to the third species.” ST II-II 92,2,c
Trust in a pagan token qua pagan would be idolatry. (Arguably, placing an unequivocally pagan symbol of a pagan diety on a Christian altar right beside the Lord of All, would… Hmm…) Trust in any token, object, creature, etc, qua itself would also be idolatry.
Now, if it was a Catholic amulet, traditional or lawfully ingrafted, and it was trusted insofar as it was a token, this would apply to the third category St. Thomas enumerates. A sort of “it can’t fail because I’m wearing it,” rather then imparting grace from its source (ie. God) insofar as one is disposed to recieve the grace or the grace is freely imparted by God. If one were to take it as causally protective in itself, rather than as protective because it is consecrated to God, I would argue that this would be problematic.
I’m out of my depth as to whether or not something like this could be lawfully ingrafted as a devotional practice. It seems as though the object’s manufacture involved the second type of superstition St. Thomas enumerates, which is a problem…
It seems to me that this would be a perfect time to introduce the young man to the Brown Scapular, or like Catholic symbol, that can be worn as a profession of his soon-to-be-confirmed Faith.
There is good in that the man wishes to be strengthened and protected and does not see himself as the source and center of these things, but his desires need to be properly channeled and rooted in the One Who Truly Saves. Faith in Christ alone is truly what will bring that which this man seeks and will allow him to be the man that he should be. Indigenous symbols can be cutesie reminders of a forgotten past and a longing for tradition in this unrooted modernity (good things), but they can also be attachments and allegiances to powers that one is placing before God. The description given sounds like the latter and thus the amulate has to go.
But again, the baptism and confirmation is the perfect time for this — it can be a beautiful opportunity for the man to literally set down the signs and symbols of his pagan life and to emerge from the waters of baptism to take up the signs, symbols, and creeds of Faith in the Risen Lord Jesus who has conquered as no pagan myth has conquered and now reigns for all eternity.
Fr. Z recommended a book The Trouble with Magic: Our Failed Search for More and Christ’s Fulfillment of our Desires by Fr. Ermatinger a few months ago. This would be helpful to more fully dig into why such things should be set down.
https://a.co/d/fj5p5fm
2 Maccabees 12:38-46
I’d imagine the usual “burn it or bury it” still applies?