Card. Dolan on Pres. Obama’s attack on YOUR freedom of conscience and the 1st Amendment

Cardinal-To-Be Dolan, Archbishop of New York, had an Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal which is worthy of your attention.  Here is an excerpt, the last part with my emphases:

[…]

The rule forces insurance companies to provide these services without a co-pay, suggesting they are “free”—but it is naïve to believe that. There is no free lunch, and you can be sure there’s no free abortion, sterilization or contraception. There will be a source of funding: you.

Coercing religious ministries and citizens to pay directly for actions that violate their teaching is an unprecedented incursion into freedom of conscience. Organizations fear that this unjust rule will force them to take one horn or the other of an unacceptable dilemma: Stop serving people of all faiths in their ministries—so that they will fall under the narrow exemption—or stop providing health-care coverage to their own employees.

The Catholic Church defends religious liberty, including freedom of conscience, for everyone. The Amish do not carry health insurance. The government respects their principles. Christian Scientists want to heal by prayer alone, and the new health-care reform law respects that. Quakers and others object to killing even in wartime, and the government respects that principle for conscientious objectors. By its decision, the Obama administration has failed to show the same respect for the consciences of Catholics and others who object to treating pregnancy as a disease.

This latest erosion of our first freedom should make all Americans pause. When the government tampers with a freedom so fundamental to the life of our nation, one shudders to think what lies ahead.

What lies ahead?  I’ll probably be in the cell next to you, Your Eminence.

His point about the double-standard for other religious groups (e.g., Quakers) is very good.

WDTPRS kudos to Card. Dolan.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , ,
42 Comments

QUAERITUR: Kissing the priest’s stole after receiving absolution

From a reader:

I’ve encountered the custom of the penitent kissing the sole of the priest after he is given absolution. I have been unable to find any information about the origins or the application of this practice.

I have heard of this too, though I haven’t experienced it. In fact, I doubt I will. Except in special cases, I hear confessions only in a confessional with a fixed barrier.  In Europe you will find confessionals with an open front, from which the stole could extend.  I suppose it would be easier to do that way.

confessionalEven in the USA in some older churches which haven’t been entirely crucified by liturgists you can still find some older confessional with a curtain over the opening of the priest’s door.

The priest should, when one is available, put on a stole to hear confessions. Nevertheless, if he doesn’t have a stole handy, his absolution would still be valid, all things being equal.

In the Eastern Churches, however, I believe it is the practice for the priest to drape his stole on the head of the penitent while hearing the confession.

Perhaps some reader out there can dig this up.

The idea behind the gesture is pretty clear: the stole is the symbol of the priest’s power (from Christ) and authority (from the Church) to forgive sins. That is a rather awesome thing to contemplate. You can understand how such a custom would arise.

UPDATE:

Pondering this a bit, I wonder if there isn’t a connection between this custom and the woman in Mark 5 who was healed by touching the hem of Christ’s garment.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
28 Comments

Statements from US Bishops about Pres. Obama attack: Your Reports

People from all over are writing to me about what their local bishop is writing or saying about Pres. Obama’s attack on the 1st Amendment, on religious freedom, and on the Catholic Church.

I posted entries about the great Bp. Sample (D. Marquette) and Bp. Zubik (D. Pittsburgh).  I have also posted about Card. Dolan.

I can’t post everything anyone sends. Think about it.

YOU can post something here.

I ask that you just post the news and A LINK without lots of comments and discussion.  Just the fact, folks.  The Who, What, Where, Why, When, What Means, etc., please.  Link and brief explanation.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
39 Comments

Bp. Zubik (D. Pittsburgh) on Obama to Catholic Church: “To Hell with You.”

His Excellency Most Rev. David A. Zubik, Bishop of Pittsburgh has issued a powerful statement about Pres. Obama’s attack on religious liberty, the 1st Amendment, and the Catholic Church.

Here are some excerpts.  I am NOT making this up.

[…]

Kathleen Sebelius and through her, the Obama administration, have said “To Hell with You” to the Catholic faithful of the United States.

To Hell with your religious beliefs,
To Hell with your religious liberty,
To Hell with your freedom of conscience.

We’ll give you a year, they are saying, and then you have to knuckle under. As Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops responded, “in effect, the president is saying that we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences.”

As I wrote to you last September, with this mandate the democratic process is being ignored while we are being ordered to ignore our religious beliefs. And we are being told not only to violate our beliefs, but to pay directly for that violation; to subsidize the imposition of a contraceptive and abortion culture on every person in the United States.

It is time to go back to work. They have given us a year to adapt to this rule. We can’t! We simply cannot!

Write to the president.

Write to Secretary Sebelius.

Write to our Senators.

Write to those in Congress.

[…]

This mandate can be changed by Congressional pressure. The only way that action will happen is if you and I take action.

Let them know that you and I will not allow ourselves to be pushed around (or worse yet) be dismissed because of our Catholic faith.

Let them know that you and I will not allow our religious freedom to be compromised.

Let them know that you and I will not allow our religious liberty to be rescinded.

Nobody, not even the president of the United States or anyone who represents him, has the right to say to you and to me as U.S. citizens, as Catholics, or as both: “To Hell with You.”

The president and our elected leaders need to hear from you and me and to listen to us NOW.

[…]

WDTPRS kudos to Bp. Zubik.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
55 Comments

Bp. Sample: “We cannot – we will not – comply with this unjust law.”

His Excellency Alex Sample, Bishop of Marquette, has made a powerful statement in the face of the Obama Administration’s open attack on the Catholic Church, the 1st Amendment, and the religious freedom of all Americans. My friend Fr. john Boyle at Caritas in veritate receives my biretta tip.

Bishop Sample: “We cannot – we will not – comply with this unjust law”

Bp. Sample

The Most Reverend Alexander K Sample, Bishop of Marquette, has published a letter to be read at all Masses this coming weekend. It comes in the wake of the Obama Administration’s decision to force all employers, including Catholic employers, to offer health coverage that includes sterlization, abortion-inducing drugs, and contraception thereby denying Catholics and the Catholic Church the freedom to practise and live according to their religious beliefs.

WDTPRS kudos to my old friend Bp. Sample.

He better be careful or he’s going to wind up moved to … Chicago.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , ,
32 Comments

QUAERITUR: Formula for distribution of Communion in Ordinary Form

From a priest:

Do you know when exactly the formula for giving Communion to the faithful was changed?

In the Ordinary Form the minister says “Corpus Christi… The Body of Christ” and the communicant responds “Amen”.

In the Extraordinary Form the minister says something closer to what the priest says before his own Communion “Corpus Domini nostri Jesu Christi custodiat animam tuam in vitam aeternam. Amen.” The minister says “Amen”, not the communicant.

My understanding is that Paul VI in 1964 said said that the formula should be shortened. Inter oecumenici 48, i.  There was a follow up decree Quo actuosius, beginning:

“In order that the people may more actively and beneficially take part in the sacrifice of the Mass and profess their faith in the eucharistic mystery in the very act of receiving communion, numerous requests have been submitted to Pope Paul VI for a more appropriate formulary for the distribution of communion.” (BTW… I don’t think the claimed motive worked.)

Corpus Christi”  is what was said in the Ambrosian Rite (Paul VI had been Archbishop of Milan, of course.) and the shorter form is attested to both Sts. Ambrose and Augustine. The shortened form was therefore picked up for the Novus Ordo.

Ambrose (probably) wrote in his work to the newly baptized (therefore Augustine would have something like this from Ambrose own lips) De sacramentis 4.25:

“So you say not indifferently ‘Amen’, already confessing in spirit that you receive the body of Christ. Therefore, when you ask, the priest says to you: ‘the body of Christ’, and you say: ‘Amen’, that is, ‘truly’. What the tongue confesses let the affection hold. That you may know, moreover: ‘This is a sacrament, whose figure went on before’.”

Augustine said in s. 272, preached perhaps in 408 on Pentecost, to the infantes (newly baptized) about the fact that we see one thing (bread) but we receive another (Christ).

“What you hear, you see, is ‘The Body of Christ,’ and you answer, ‘Amen’. So be a member of the body of Christ, in order to make that ‘Amen’ true.”

In any event, despite the Patristic pedigree, in this time of weak Catholic identity, we should by means of the “gravitational pull” exerted by the Extraordinary Form, return in the Novus Ordo to the older form of distribution, perhaps beginning on weekdays.  Right now, that would be contra legem.


Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Patristiblogging, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
37 Comments

Pray for Bishops!

The US Bishops are going to need steel… spines in the upcoming battle for religious liberty.

Bishops, however, remain human beings, sinners, susceptible to many negative pressures.

And do not forget that the Enemy of the Soul hates bishops with the relentless focus cunning of an angelic being.

Pray for our bishops, especially for your local bishop.

There is an online initiative to promote prayer for bishops which you might refer to: Rosary For The Bishop.

You should pray for your bishops every single day.  I also recommend offering your penances for your bishop.

Tomorrow, for example, is a Friday. We are to do penance on Fridays.  Make a plan to offer some penance for your bishop.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

USCCB on Obama Administration’s attack on Catholic religious freedom

Check out a blog entry from Sr. Mary Ann Walsh of the USCCB’s media office.

Here is the first part.

HHS ABC RULE: ANYBODY BUT CATHOLICS HAS RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Health and Human Services’ recent attacks on freedom of religion show it is deaf to religious sensibilities. Even the Administration’s resounding defeat on January 11—when the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Administration’s reading of the First Amendment as “extreme,” “untenable,” and having “no merit”—couldn’t unplug its ears.

The Court held in Hosanna Tabor v. EEOC that the government could not meddle in the internal affairs of religious organizations, in this case, a Lutheran church and school. Yet nine days later, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said it would force all but a few religious organizations to violate their own teachings in providing health care benefits to their own people. Specifically, the government has ordered virtually all employers—nationwide— to sponsor and subsidize health care coverage of sterilization and contraceptives, including abortion-inducing drugs, for their employees. And it gave church employers a year to get in line.

The First Amendment unambiguously says that government “shall make no law” prohibiting the free exercise of religion. It doesn’t say that some laws trampling free exercise are fine. It says no law.

Yet, nine days after the Hosanna-Tabor decision, on January 20, HHS announced its decision to keep in place the frightening mandate in the health care law, with barely the slightest nod to religious concerns. HHS holds to the absurd rule it announced last August, that church ministries get a religious exemption only if they employ and serve primarily co-religionists.

Must Catholic hospitals, to be true to their identity, now turn away people of other faiths from their emergency rooms and fire non-Catholic employees? Currently, Catholic hospitals serve one out of six people who seek hospital care in our country. Must Catholic Charities hire and serve only Catholics in its food pantries and other social service agencies? Until today, you didn’t need a baptismal certificate for soup.

This egregious violation of religious freedom marks the first time in our history that the federal government is forcing religious people and groups to ante up for services that violate their consciences. Some claim this is all about access to contraceptives—but everyone knows how and where to get them, and get them cheaply. And the mandate also forces coverage of sterilization and abortion-causing drugs. This is about forcing the church to pay for all these things through insurance coverage, to sponsor these “benefits” that it considers immoral. This is, in other words, about freedom of religion, which is a foundation stone of U.S. democracy.

[…]

Read the rest there, where you can also comment.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , , ,
7 Comments

Statue of Our Lady at 1571 Battle of Lepanto comes to light!

An alert reader sent me to an interesting article in Spanish at ABC about the original statue of Our Lady given by Venice to don Juan de Austria that was on the quarterdeck of his flagship (more properly “lantern galley”) at Lepanto.

Apparently it had been lost for years but was recently rediscovered and is undergoing restoration at the Spanish Navy Museum:

Virgen del Rosario o della Vitoria

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
17 Comments

Another confirmation that NeoCats must follow official liturgical books for Mass

From CNA comes this about the NeoCats and their liturgical variants.

Rome, Italy, Jan 25, 2012 / 01:56 pm (CNA).- Father Ricardo Reyes Castillo, a member of the Neocatechumenal Way, said Pope Benedict XVI’s approval of the movement’s non-liturgical celebrations “has changed absolutely nothing.”

The Panamanian priest told CNA on Jan. 23 that the papal approval of the celebrations contained in the Neocatechumenal Catechetical Directory means “simply that the Church has confirmed that the rites used in the different stages of formation in the Neocatechumenal Way are in accord with the tradition of the Church.”

“This is just another step in the process through which the Church lovingly follows the faithful who belong to this experience of faith,” he added.

The Pontifical Council for the Laity approved the ceremonies outlined in the Catechetical Directory of the Neocatechumenal Way, specifying that this approval applied to those celebrations “which are not, by their nature, already regulated by the liturgical books of the Church.”

[…]

Again, the NeoCats are required to follow the official liturgical books, though, as I understand, with the permission of the local bishop, they can move the Sign of Peace.

Posted in Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
25 Comments