Is this your family?

From a reader.

Is this your family?

Posted in Lighter fare |
14 Comments

Facebook question, “like” it or not.

I have a Facebook page HERE.  I don’t do much with Facebook, however. Is that bad?

I have a question for you knowledgeable readers and veteran Facebook users.

I have usually between 4900 and 5000 “friends” on Facebook.  I have nearly 1000 friend requests right now and I just don’t have the energy to look at everything.  Alas, it maxes out at 5000.  There is apparently another kind of “page”, however.  I don’t quite get the difference.

One Facebook page I have seen is that of some “public figures” who have tens of thousands of people who “like” them. They obviously don’t have to go through the rigamarole of approving “friend” requests, etc. And it doesn’t max out at 5000.

We may have been through this here before, but I am little thick when it comes to Facebook.

I made a new “page” over there, and I think it is the more flexible sort. Click HERE.

I could use some instruction and pointers. I might have to enlist a few people to watch things for me. I am getting a little overwhelmed, frankly, and need to aim some energy at a couple other important things.

Can I merge the page that maxes out at 5000 with some new page that doesn’t have a limit?  I really don’t want more than one Facebook… thingy.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged
28 Comments

WDTPRS: Last Days of Advent: 18 December – Liberation Theology

In these final days of Advent preparation, the Church prays with great intensity. It is one of the “greater feria” of Advent, the home stretch, as it were.

Here is today’s

COLLECT (2002MR):
Concede, quaesumus, omnipotens Deus,
ut, qui sub peccati iugo ex vetusta servitute deprimimur,
expectata Unigeniti tui nova nativitate liberemur.

This was in the 1962MR on Ember Saturday of Advent. It was before that in the Veronese, Gelasian and Gregorian Sacramentaries. These advent prayers often refer to the “state of oldness”, which pertains to the “old man” afflicted by the sin of our First Parents.

WDTPRS LITERAL VERSION:
Grant, we beseech You, Almighty God,
that we who are oppressed under the yoke of sin from the servitude of the old man,
may be freed bu the long awaited new Nativity of Your Only-Begotten.

NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):
Grant, we pray, almighty God,
that we, who are weighed down from of old
by slavery beneath the yoke of sin,
may be set free by the newness
of the long-awaited Nativity
of your Only Begotten Son
.

Christ came to set us free from sin.  He is the great Liberator.  The Collect reflects this.  In a sense, it is a true “liberation theology”.

In one of his books about liturgy, A New Song For The Lord, Joseph Ratzinger took a cue from Liberation Theology as a starting point.  Consider that as Prefect of the CDF, which dealt with Liberation Theology gone wild and wrong, Papa Ratzinger knows Liberation Theology better than most Liberation Theologians.  He knows what the good points of it are as well as where it goes wrong.

Save The Liturgy Save The WorldChrist frees us in our liturgical encounters the transcendent, with mystery.  Our liturgical worship takes on greater urgency when considered in light our are profound need, how small we are, what a vast gulf lies between us and God, source of our being and goal toward whom we return.   Consider this passage from the above mentioned book by Ratzinger, A New Song for the Lord, p. 40:

“… [W]e can explain the fundamental change in the understanding of ritual and liturgy that has recently come about after a long time in the making: the primary subject of the liturgy is neither God nor Christ, but the ‘we’ of the ones celebrating. [So reinforced by versus populum celebration of Mass and the “gimme” gesture of Communion in the hand, not to mention the lyrics of ditties sung ad nauseum.] And liturgy cannot of course have adoration as its primary content since, according to the deistic understanding of God, there is no reason for it. There is just as little reason for it to be concerned with atonement, sacrifice, or the forgiveness of sin. Instead, the point for those celebrating is to secure community with each other and thereby escape the isolation into which modern existence forces them. The point is to communicate experiences of liberation, joy, and reconciliation; denounce what is harmful; and provide impulses for action. For this reason the community has to create its own liturgy and not just receive it from traditions that have become unintelligible; it portrays itself and celebrates itself. Admittedly, we must not overlook a countermovement that is becoming ever more evident, particularly among the younger generation. To an increasing degree people are seeing through the banality and the childish rationalism of the pathetic homemade liturgies with their artificial theatrics; it is becoming obvious how trivial they are. [NB] The authority of mystery has disappeared, and the tiny self-affirmations with which one tries to make good this loss cannot even satisfy the functionaries in the long run, let alone those to whom such activities are supposed to appeal. Hence, the search for a true presence of redemption grows. Admittedly it does lead in very diverse directions. The huge rock festivals are occasions for letting existence run wild; they are raging antiliturgies where people are yanked out of themselves and where they can forget the dullness and commonness of everyday life. Drugs, too, belong to this category. On the other hand people are increasingly attracted to the magical and esoteric as the place where mystery supposedly reaches out to humans. Finally we can say that new places for faith emerge again where the liturgy is lit up by mystery”.

Reason #2 for Summorum Pontificum to be implemented in as many places as possible.

I urge all priests and bishops who read this blog with any slight quaver of resonance or benevolence, to consider this with care:

If you sense that something quite serious and important is going on right now, for the love of God rethink your approach to how you foster Holy Church’s proper public worship.

Do all in your power and through your influence to foster a worship of God which conforms not to worldly goals – as praiseworthy as they may be in a world still dominated by its dire prince – but rather to the real point of religion: an encounter with mystery.

Our worship must become more and more focused on the one who is Other.  Seek what is truly above in your rites and raise people to encounter mystery.

You will be challenged and reviled, blocked and attacked as you do.  You will be worn down and afraid under the weight of resistance.

But I think that to free and to save the world we must save the liturgy.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , ,
11 Comments

New, 2012 Ordo has arrived

Thanks to the kind folks at Angelus Press, I have a new Ordo for the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite. 

20111216-132857.jpg

“But Father! But Father”, some people are about to ask, with a rising pitch:  “Why do you write about this Ordo from the publishers of the SSPX?!? Some people say they are [whispering…] schismatics!  Shouldn’t you be using the Ordo from the… the… well… some other Extraordinary Form Ordo?”

Angelus Press took the time and effort to send me the Ordo.  Others have not.

Who are those other publishers of an Ordo, by the way?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
16 Comments

QUAERITUR: Getting a blessing at Communion time. Fr. Z rants.

From a reader:

We hope to bring 2 children (extended family) to Mass on Christmas Eve. They have not been baptized.

QUAERITUR: Are unbaptized children allowed to go up to Communion with their arms crossed and receive a blessing? What about an adult who has been baptized but is not Catholic?

A priest can invoke God’s blessing on anyone, baptized or not.

However, Communion time is Communion time, not Blessing Time. There is a time for receiving a blessing during Mass, as it turns out.

This is a controversial topic and one about which I have written many times. You might check THIS entry, for example.

This practice has, alas, become widespread, much in the same way as church-wide hand-holding, or people saying the priest’s prayers, or having too many EMHCs have become wide-spread.  And when someone (read: Father) suggests that these things should be curtailed, people who are emotionally invested in these practices call Father “mean” and then stage a little nutty about their “rights”, as if just because they like doing x or y, they are empowered by baptism with “rights” to do as they please.

Are non-Communicants “allowed” to go forward at Communion time?  I guess so. An alarm won’t be triggered if they do.

But think about what is going on at different stages of Holy Mass.

Masses generally have three major orations or prayers: the Collect, the Super oblata over the gifts, the Post Communion.  In each case in the Roman Rite there is a procession and a greeting and then the prayer.

The procession before the Post Communion is actually the procession of those people who go forward to receive the Eucharist because they are a) baptized and b) in Communion with the Church c) admitted to Communion, and d) properly disposed physically by fasting, and e) properly disposed spiritually by being in the state of grace.  What happens in the parish church may not seem like a procession in all cases, but going forward is a liturgical act of the faithful, who, because of an interior disposition (baptismal character and a willed, knowing, active receptivity) manifest their disposition outwardly in movement to go forward to receive.

Our baptismal character and our ability to receive is the key to the movement forward.

In ancient times, the non-baptized catechumens were not even allowed to be inside the Church when the Eucharistic phase of Mass began, much less trot up and get a blessing, something entirely inappropriate for the moment.

Of course, practically speaking, mothers cannot leave unbaptized infants or children below the age of reason in the pew alone.  If Mom chooses to receive at Mass, Mom brings little Stupor or Stupores Mundi along.

But going forward at Communion time actually means something.  It isn’t a time for curiosity fulfillment, or novelty seeking, or entertaining young’uns.

Finally, that “arms crossed” thing.  To add to the confusion, some people cross their arms when they want to receive Communion on the tongue, instead of on the hand.

A plant that is in the wrong place is a weed.  A rose in the wrong place is a weed.  Roses are great, but they don’t belong everywhere.  Blessings are great, but they don’t belong everywhere.  I think we need to weed this practice out of our participation at Mass.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , ,
33 Comments

The first podcasts of… Alexander Graham Bell: recovered!

This is for your Just Too Cool file from The History Blog, which has a very high cool quotient.

Alexander Graham Bell. Bell, his cousin Chicester Bell and their colleague Charles Sumner Tainter created a business called Volta Laboratory Associates dedicated to research and development of sound recording technology. Between 1881 and 1885, they studied and experimented with a number of recording technologies at their lab in Washington, D.C., recording sound on metal, rubber, glass and beeswax, among other media.

It was a heady time for inventors, with the likes of Bell, Thomas Edison and Emile Berliner all competing to unlock the key to playable sound recordings. To ensure they had evidence to support any contested patent application, the inventors stored recordings and research notes with the Smithsonian. The National Museum of American History thus has been the proud owner of 400 of the earliest audio recordings ever made since the late 19th century. None of them were playable, however, so it was a collection of 400 silent audio recordings.

[…]

Advances in computer technology made it possible to play back the recordings, said Carl Haber, a senior scientist at the Berkeley Lab. He noted that 10 years ago specialists would have struggled with computer speeds and storage issues. The digital images that now can be processed into sound within minutes would have taken days to process a decade ago.

Many of the recordings are fragile, and until recently it had not been possible to listen to them without damaging the discs or cylinders.

So far, the sounds of six discs have been successfully recovered through the process, which creates a high-resolution digital map of the disc or cylinder. The map is processed to remove scratches and skips, and software reproduces the audio content to create a standard digital sound file.

For more technical details, pictures of the discs and most importantly, all six converted recordings, see the program’s website here. They’re very short audio tests, basically, like the first few verses of Hamlet’s “to be or not to be” soliloquy, random trills and countdowns. My favorite bar far is the second “Mary Had a Little Lamb” recording which is interrupted by an “Oh no!” at the end. It’s the first recorded mistake! (That we’ve heard, anyway.)

[…]

You can find a download link over there.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
2 Comments

We are amused

I have always said that when my day finally comes and I am at last named Cardinal Archbishop of Black Duck, for my … or should I say our… entrance into our cathedral to take possession of what is ours we shall wear a black cope and we shall be accompanied by the Imperial March from Star Wars.

Black Duck has, alas, been dominated for many years by liberals.

We have found their lack of Faith disturbing.

Some Lutherans, however, no doubt readers of our blog, have taken our idea. We must admit it has a rather spiffy look which confirms us in our design.

[wp_youtube]fUrMcQ3ro0E[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
16 Comments

Archbp. Nienstedt (St Paul and Minneapolis) proposes Marriage Prayer for MN Amendment

From The Catholic Spirit, the newspaper and site of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, comes this.  With my emphases and comments:

To assist statewide efforts to defend and define marriage in the Minnesota Constitution, Archbishop John Nienstedt has issued a prayer intended for use as part of the Prayers of the Faithful at Mass.

The archbishop also encourages use of the prayer in eucharistic adoration chapels so worshipers can pray for the success of the state marriage amendment and all efforts to strengthen marriage, according to a letter posted on the archdiocesan website at http://www.archspm.org. He also is calling on Catholics in the archdiocese to embrace Fridays as a day of prayer and sacrifice for the success of the amendment effort. [You’ve got to know that, now that they are going to move this even more into the realm of prayer, the forces of Hell itself will being to attack the Archbishop and all who support this effort even more viciously.]

[NB] The amendment, supported by Minnesota’s Catholic bishops, will appear on the 2012 ballot. It will ask voters: “Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to provide that only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Minnesota?

“The current struggle to defend and define marriage within our civil constitution demands a three-fold approach,” Archbishop Nienstedt said. [1] “We must educate our fellow citizens on the meaning and good of marriage. [2] We must actively and resolutely promote widespread participation among our fellow believers in the support of a marriage amendment. And, most importantly, [3] we must pray and offer sacrifice for the success of all endeavors that seek to protect and promote marriage.”

Copies of the prayer may be downloaded or ordered from the archdiocesan Office of Worship.

Here is the prayer:

Heavenly Father,

Through the powerful intercession of the Holy Family, grant to this local Church the many graces we need to foster, strengthen, and support faith-filled, holy marriages and holy families.

May the vocation of married life, a true calling to share in your own divine and creative life, be recognized by all believers as a source of blessing and joy, and a revelation of your own divine goodness.

Grant to us all the gift of courage to proclaim and defend your plan for marriage, which is the union of one man and one woman in a lifelong, exclusive relationship of loving trust, compassion, and generosity, open to the conception of children.

We make our prayer through Jesus Christ, who is Lord forever and ever. Amen.

There is a combox over there, too.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
3 Comments

Minnesota: complaint that Church was “lobbying” concerning true marriage dismissed

I think there may be a political/social war brewing in St. Paul, Minnesota along the lines of what we saw in Madison, Wisconsin over the issue of the state budget and labor unions.  In Minnesota, however, the issue will be an proposed amendment to the state constitution in defense of true, natural marriage.  I suspect that the proponents of unnatural unions from outside Minnesota will flood the state capitol with all manner of demonstrations as the day to vote draws near in November 2012.  The Minnesota Catholic Conference has nailed their colors to the mast on this matter.  They deserve our strong support.

There will be all manner of bullying and intimidation applied to dioceses, bishops, priests.  They need your prayers and support.  People who hate the Church and her message about the dignity of human life in all aspects will try to silence bishops and priests.  They are bullies and their threats and attacks must be resisted.

To this end, I noted with interest a story on CNS:

Catholic DVD on marriage not a lobbying effort, campaign board rules

ST. PAUL, Minn. (CNS) — Minnesota’s Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board has dismissed a complaint stemming from a DVD on marriage mailed to 400,000 Catholics in the state by the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis in September 2010. The complainant, Minneapolis attorney Kurt M. Anderson, had argued that the mailing constituted a lobbying effort by the archdiocese and therefore triggered certain registration and reporting requirements under Minnesota campaign law. “There is a sufficient basis on which to reasonably conclude that the archdiocese’s communications were for a purpose other than to influence legislative action,” the board said in its 12-page decision, announced Dec. 8. “As a result, there is no probable cause to conclude that the archdiocese became a ‘principal’ as a result of the subject communications.” The board also found “no probable cause” that the archdiocese should have been required to register a political fund or register as a lobbyist because of its actions. Anderson had contended that the DVD campaign — which took place about six weeks before voters were to elect members of the Minnesota Legislature — was a lobbying effort aimed at persuading legislators to place a constitutional amendment defining marriage on the state ballot. In the DVD, Archbishop John C. Nienstedt of St. Paul and Minneapolis said, “I have called on the Legislature to allow voters to consider a constitutional amendment to preserve marriage as the union between one man and one woman. The archdiocese believes that the time has come for voters to be presented directly with an amendment to the state constitution to preserve our historic understanding of marriage,” he added.

Posted in One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , , , ,
5 Comments

WDTPRS POLL: GOP Nominee – Whom would YOU choose? (Round 1)

Will some of you bloggers out there give me a hand with this?  It would be nice to have a large sample.  I am trying to keep this as neutral and as objective as possible.

The last TV debate before the Iowa Caucuses is history.  I have seen quite a few of the debates.  I still haven’t a clear idea about my support of a candidate yet.

I am curious about your view.

Here is a WDTPRS POLL.  It will be open for 1 week, until about midnight EST 23 December.

Anyone can vote, whether registered here or not.   Please do vote!  I cannot track who you are or how you voted.

NB: Students, seminarians, people sharing a computer or a single IP at an institution may be blocked from voting if someone you share with has already jumped in.  If wish, email me your vote.  I won’t identify who you are.

Add a BRIEF comment if you wish, explaining your choice.  Keep it BRIEF.  BRIEF.  As in AS SHORT AS POSSIBLE to make your point.

Also, for the sake of peace, do NOT… do NOT engage each other in the combox.  Do not respond to… do not react to… do not compliment, agree with, or disagree with any other person in the combox.  State your own view only.  I will go through and delete all comments which mention other commentators.  I impose this so that people won’t be afraid to state their opinion.

Please vote ONCE only.  Thanks.  People who cannot vote legally in US elections, … please don’t vote, but leave a comment in the combox if you wish.

I originally posted the candidates names in ALPHABETICAL ORDER.  If I change the poll default options for a different poll I may post, the order will probably shift around.  I will wait for there to be quite a few votes registered before I vote.  The RESULTS order of names will, I believe, reflect the number of votes. The order the candidates names appear in the RESULTS (after you vote) does NOT reflect my own preference or my vote.

Which GOP candidate would you more likely support today? In alphabetical order....

  • Paul (40%, 1,465 Votes)
  • Santorum (22%, 825 Votes)
  • Gingrich (18%, 676 Votes)
  • Romney (7%, 262 Votes)
  • Bachmann (4%, 138 Votes)
  • Huntsman (3%, 117 Votes)
  • Perry (3%, 111 Votes)
  • I COULD vote in a GOP primary, but I WILL NOT VOTE. (2%, 90 Votes)

Total Voters: 3,685

NB: I am posting about Republican candidates because there is no Democratic race for President this time around.  Were there also a Democrat challenger to Pres. Obama, I would also put up a poll about that race.

I may repost this poll from time to time.

UPDATE: 19 Dec 1527 GMT:

I watched late yesterday as there was a sharp flood of several hundred votes for Ron Paul in a narrow time frame.  Then the sharp spike stopped.

Posted in POLLS, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
109 Comments