Wisconsin: Planned Parenthood Loses Tax Funding

Good news from Wisconsin is being reported by LifeSite:

Planned Parenthood Loses $130K in Tax Funding in Wisconsin

by Steven Ertelt

The Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin abortion business has been cut from a $130,000 program in Wisconsin that contracts with health care providers to provide women with free breast and cervical cancer screenings.

The Wisconsin Department of Health and Services cut out Planned Parenthood from the program, which previously sent the abortion business the fund exchange for providing the services for women. Although the screenings can be obtained at other providers officials with the abortion business complained about the decision to WBAY.

“I’m very worried about the women that we serve, and the actions taken to remove Planned Parenthood from the Well Woman program are really cold-hearted and a huge disservice to the women in our communities,” Well Woman program coordinator Kristen Biese said.

But Governor Scott Walker, who is pro-life, says women can get the same screening help from legitimate medical providers that do not also kill and injure women and children in abortions. [With the help of taxpayers’ money.] He said the program is not being eliminated, just modified so abortion centers don’t receive taxpayer funding.

“The program is still in place. The Well Woman, in particular to make sure women have access to exams for cancer and other things, is funding. It’s in place. We’re just not contracting with Planned Parenthood to do that,” Governor Walker said.

[… read the rest there….]ACTION: Thank Governor Walker here.

WDTPRS to Gov. Walker, who is under attack from the liberal left and unions because of his efforts to get spending under control.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Emanations from Penumbras, Fr. Z KUDOS, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
7 Comments

NYC: Nativity Scene at Central Park

I’ll definitely be checking this out when I get there.

From the Catholic League:

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments as follows:

Today we erected a life-size nativity scene in Central Park, on the corner of 59th and 5th; it will be up until January 3. Moreover, we did not surround it with secular symbols.

Every year we get a permit from the New York City Parks Department to display our nativity scene. We choose Central Park because it is a public forum, a place where concerts, marathons and all sorts of festivities take place. We do not seek to display our crèche on public property adjacent to City Hall, because that is the seat of government.

This needs to be said because there is considerable ignorance about this issue. For example, the New Jersey State League of Municipalities recently released a statement offering guidance to local officials planning holiday displays. “A purely religious display, especially one related to a single religion, is almost certainly unconstitutional.”

There is nothing “almost certain” about my response—they don’t know what they are talking about. If they were right, then we wouldn’t have been able to put our crèche up in Central Park. There is a difference between a public forum and a state capitol building, etc.

Clarence Thomas got it right when he lashed out at his colleagues for not accepting cases that might clarify this issue. On October 31, he said “we have learned that a crèche displayed on government property violates the Establishment Clause, except when it doesn’t. Likewise, a menorah displayed on government property violates the Establishment Clause, except when it doesn’t.” That is why he called for “a clear, workable standard.”

We hope New Yorkers and tourists alike get a chance to see our crèche. Our detractors should see it as well—it may prove to be a real epiphany.

WDTPRS kudos to Bill Donohue and the Catholic League staff!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
13 Comments

Reception of the new, corrected translation on college campuses

Most of the hand-wringing over the new, corrected translation of the Roman Missal was predicated on the notion that people are too stoopid to understand English.  I must admit, however, when I read some of the articles after the 1st Sunday of Advent, it may be that the tiny group of complainers were, in fact, too stoopid.  All in all, I think people grasped the changes pretty well and have already moved along.

The Cardinal Newman Society, which keeps an eye on Catholic colleges and universities, has a piece on their site about the reception of the new, corrected translation on campuses.

Let’s have a look with my emphases and comments.

At Catholic Colleges, Mass Translation ‘Much Ado About Nothing’

The prophecies of the calamitous consequences of the introduction of the new missal were heard around the country. But was it much ado about little?There were warnings from some Catholic publications that the new translation was “unreadable” and an “inhibitor to authentic prayer.”

One news story suggested that “New missal could drive away Catholics.” Another fretted, “Liturgists Worry About Upcoming Implementation.”

But according to a number of priests and campus ministry professionals at faithful Catholic colleges, it seems that all the worry about the new missal translation is a bit like Y2K – prophecies of doom and gloom followed quickly by rather smooth sailing.

“There was no fainting, no shrieking, no embolisms,” assured Director of Campus Ministry at Belmont Abbey College Patricia Stevenson. “We haven’t had anybody sort of whining or complaining or objecting.”

She told the Cardinal Newman Society that the introduction of the new translation is going smoothly.

Fr John Healey, Chaplain of the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts, told CNS, “It certainly hasn’t come to pass that people who were predicting difficulties were in any sense correct.”

Magdalene Riggins, Assistant Director of Campus Ministry said she thinks the new translation will allow students to engage more deeply with the Mass. “I think this will help students and everyone more deeply understand what the liturgy is all about,” she said.

In fact, some said students seem to like the new translation.

So too does the Rev. Joseph Fox, O.P. of Christendom College, calling it “a far superior translation.”

Fr. Fox said much of the screaming about how this would negatively affect the faithful turned out to be “much ado about nothing.”

He said that while the priests have much to remember, the changes are not very significant for the faithful. In fact, he laughed at all the fuss. “Some places have made such a big deal about educating the people about the changes,” he said. “I don’t mean to make light but all of this for ‘and with your spirit’?”

Fr. Fox said the concerns and protests over the new translation weren’t coming from young people. [Indeed.] “This was made a cause célèbre because now finally we have a translation and not a complete reformulation of the liturgy,” he said.

Fr. Healey agreed, saying the fuss was primarily from “the chronic complainers.”  [read: liberals]

Stevenson said she suspected it was one last battle of the Vatican II generation. [“Ahhh… [puff …  … … COUGH]… I remember Woodstock… ] “I think this was about some fighting the old Vatican II fight and climbing one more hill to plant a flag on,” she said. “But students don’t relate to those old discussions. For most students this is completely uncontroversial. They don’t have any dogs in the fight.”

She said she believes students today have shown greater receptivity to move with the Church as a whole and not see actions by the Church as “a tyrannical takeover” of their free will.  [“They’ve given in to The MAN!  We need to OCCUPY them!”]

Stevenson says Belmont Abbey College laid the groundwork by reviewing the changes with students before Mass and having a diocesan priest visit to explain the changes more fully.

Of course, in the pews are the cards to help students follow along with the changes to the language. Stevenson called them “cheat sheets” and said she suspected they’d become less necessary over the next few months.

Fr. Healey said he believed that the new translation was actually helping students see the Mass in a new way. “One has to stop and read the words carefully and reflectively pay attention to what the church is really trying to offer in terms of instruction,” he said. “And it’s a far superior translation so it’ll certainly be easier to understand.”

Fr. Joseph Fox of Christendom College said that if people want to avoid it altogether they can do as many of the students there do – attend the Latin Mass.  [Hmmm… that sounds familiar, doesn’t it?]

Kudos to the Cardinal Newman Society for checking with campus ministers. I hope they do several more installments.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
27 Comments

Christmas Cookie Recipe (New, Corrected Translation)

UPDATE 17 Dec 1405 GMT:

I originally thought this was from some seminarians.  I received it my email and without an attribution. I have since learned that it was originally posted on Commonweal.  You can find their page HERE.

By using this new version, your cookies will be more enjoyable and more fattening than ever:

Christmas Cookie Recipe
(New, Corrected Translation)

Serves: you and many.

Cream these ingredients, that by their comingling you may begin to make the dough:
1 chalice butter, 2/3 chalice sugar

In a similar way, when the butter is consubstantial with the sugar, beat in:
1 egg

Gather these dry ingredients to yourself and combine them, so that you may add them to the dough which you have already begun to make:
2 1/2 chalices sifted all-purpose flour, 1/2 teaspoon salt, 1 teaspoon vanilla

Mix the precious dough with your venerable hands.

Into the refrigerator graciously place the dough so that it may be chilled, for the duration of 3 or 4 hours, before the rolling and cutting of the cookies.

When, in the fullness of time, you are ready to bake these spotless cookies, these delicious cookies, these Christmas cookies, preheat the oven to 350 degrees.

Roll out the dough and, taking up a cookie cutter or stencil of your choosing, fashion the cookies into pleasing forms.

Sprinkle colorful adornments over cookies like the dewfall.

Bake for 8 to 10 minutes, or until the cookies have just begun to manifest the brownness that is vouchsafed to them by the oven’s heat.

May these cookies be found acceptable in your sight, and be borne to a place of refreshment at your table, there to be served with milk or hot chocolate, or with your spirits.

Merry Christmas!

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen, Just Too Cool, Lighter fare |
34 Comments

“Whatever comes out of these gates, we have better chance of survival if we work together”

Before I go off to sleep … after the GOP debate, I am watching a bit of the movie Gladiator.

I have a certain affinity with the protagonist.  I, too… well… never mind.  And I can imagine some liberal bishop saying “I’m terribly vexed.”

NB: The notion that M. Aurelius would want to restore the Republic is risible… absurd beyond describing.  I digress.

A friend who once made a living in theatrical costume and set design noted from the movie that the sister of the Emperor Commodus (former lover of the Maximus) remarked that, as she becomes more and more vulnerable and in danger during the course of the film, the costumes exposed more and more of her body.

Absolutely right!

I thought that not only a great point about the movie but about how women are portrayed in the media and forced, therefore to be.

Also, I think the game they play with the snake under the basket to be a fine metaphor of the Fishwrap (Titus the Gaul?) approach to the final judgment.

In the meantime.  Everyone calls into Hugh Hewitt’s show (he has listed moi meme as an Amicus et Socius Romae, btw… look on the sidebar!) saying “Morning Glory!”  I think everyone  should call into my show saying:

Strength and Honor!

I could use the music from Gladiator for my upcoming three-hour per day radio talk show.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
12 Comments

Sodom and Gomorrah excavated. Guess how they were wiped out.

A reading from the Book of Genesis:

Gen 19: 24 Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomor’rah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; 25 and he overthrew those cities, and all the valley, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground. 26 But Lot’s wife behind him looked back, and she became a pillar of salt. 27 And Abraham went early in the morning to the place where he had stood before the LORD; 28 and he looked down toward Sodom and Gomor’rah and toward all the land of the valley, and beheld, and lo, the smoke of the land went up like the smoke of a furnace.

A Roman friend and I always chortle over the arrogance of modern scholars who claim that event x or y didn’t occur as reported by ancient historians especially when some story pops up in the mainstream press that evidence confirming x or y has been – shock! – unearthed.

Here is something for your Just Too Cool file from The Sacred Page:

Sodom and Gomorrah Excavated

By far the most interesting session at the recent Society of Biblical Literature Congress in San Francisco was one I wandered into by chance. I am always curious about what is going on in biblical archeology, so one afternoon I decided to skip the dozen or so sessions dedicated to Bakhtinian Decontextualization of Identity Construction in Persian Yehud (I had to tear myself away) and go hear about the excavations at a certain site called “Tall-el-Hammam.” I had no idea what I was in for. After about five minutes into the session, I realized that the archeological team assigned to this dig was convinced that they had found the biblical Sodom and Gomorrah. After another half-hour, it seemed they had most of the participants convinced as well. The sites fit the geographical and temporal context into which Sodom and Gomorrah are placed in the biblical texts. The cities at the site were suddenly and completely wiped out in the Late Bronze Age, which makes a reasonably good fit with the biblical accounts of Abraham and Lot. The entire presentation was very convincing, but never once did they deal with the “elephant in the room”: what caused the sites to be suddenly abandoned? As soon as the session was over, I was the first to raise my hand. “Did you find any arrow heads? Signs of invasion? What happened to them?” The lead archeologist paused for a moment. “I didn’t want to go there,” he said. Another pause. “I’m preparing material for publication.” Pause. “All I want to say ‘on camera’ is, they appear to have been wiped out in a ‘heat event’.”

A “heat event”!? What?!

“If you want to know more, I’ll talk after the session off the record.”

I wish I could divulge what he said to a small group of us clustered around the podium after the session was over, but it would break confidence. We’ll have to wait for the official peer-reviewed publications.

Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments

Bp. Sample on how as a child he was catechized… NOT!

Michael Voris made a video about an interview conducted by Catholic World News with an old friend of mine of many years ago, His Excellency Most Reverend Alex Sample, Bishop of Marquette.  Voris has a summary of an important point from this interview.

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
24 Comments

A great Shadow… with a few book notes.

There is a very cool pic on Astronomy Pic of the Day.  There was recently a lunar eclipse.  I missed it because I was in Florida where it rained for about 4 solid days without CEASING.  But that’s another story.

In any event, in this very cool photo, you can see the shape of the Earth’s shadow.

Old Copernicus would have been thrilled.    He was careful to observe eclipses, both solar and lunar, because the casting of the shadow meant that the light source was at 180°, directly opposite.

Speaking of Copernicus, I just finished fairly light book by Dava Sobel A More Perfect Heaven: How Copernicus Revolutionized the Cosmos. (UK edition HERE)

This was sent to me by one of you readers.  Sobel also wrote Longitude and Galileo’s Daughter.  I find all them good reads, quite informative. She treats, in my opinion, the Church fairly.

UPDATE:

Traversing the shadow of the Earth, the Moon dimmed by degrees until fully immersed. Then, instead of disappearing in darkness, the eclipsed Moon daubed itself with the Sun’s color: It glowed like an ember throughout the hour of totality, reflecting all the dusk and dawn light that spilled into Earth’s shadow from the day before and the day ahead.

Copernicus never missed a lunar eclipse. No astronomer let such an opportunity slip, for the Moon in eclipse pinpointed celestial positions as no other phenomenon could. At such times the Earth’s shadow became visible on the Moon’s surface, and the center of that shadow indicated the location of the Sun—180° opposite in celestial longitude. With the Moon’s current coordinates thus confirmed, one could also measure the distances of stars and planets from either the Sun or the Moon. “In this area,” Copernicus remarked, “Nature’s kindliness has been attentive to human desires, inasmuch as the Moon’s place is determined more reliably through its eclipses than through the use of instruments, and without any suspicion of error.”

Even with the help of “Nature’s kindliness,” the tilt of the Moon’s orbit relative to the Earth’s great circle limited the frequency of lunar eclipses to once or at most twice a year, though some years have none. After August 26, there would not be another total lunar eclipse till the end of December 1525. At the moment of mid-eclipse, which Copernicus recorded on this occasion as 4:25 A.M., the Moon stood at opposition, yet stayed its course straight ahead. Unlike Jupiter or Saturn, the Moon never shifted into reverse at opposition—or ever, at any time—because the Moon, alone among all heavenly bodies, truly did orbit the Earth. “In expounding on the Moon’s motion,” Copernicus wrote, with no apparent irony, “I do not disagree with the ancients’ belief that it takes place around the Earth.”

Sobel, Dava (2011-10-04). A More Perfect Heaven: How Copernicus Revolutionized the Cosmos (Kindle Locations 702-718). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Kindle Edition.

Here is the quote from Sobel about Copernicus observing a lunar eclipse:

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , , ,
9 Comments

Feeling safe about being a faithful Catholic, are you?

OMI‘s have a video about their Spanish Martyrs.

There is an odd liturgical moment, in which, during the Mass as it was during the 30’s, the priest turned around at the elevation of the Host.  I think the producers are familiar with the Extraordinary Form.  This doesn’t take much away from the value of the video.

The video is in Spanish, but with adequate English subtitles.

If any of you are feeling safe about your Catholic identity in this crazy and rapidly changing world, you ought to watch this and think about what happened in Spain, just 80 years ago.

[wp_youtube]PT2EZ3-K9IE[/wp_youtube]

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Modern Martyrs, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
28 Comments

Problems with the Anglican Ordinariate in England?

Preamble: Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Pope Benedict gets to determine the parameters and dynamics of ecumenism, not his critics. According to his approach and vision, he has been making headway. Some will say that he is working on a foundation laid by his predecessors. That’s how these things work, after all. It’s called continuity and organic development.

Here is something from Damian Thompson. My emphases and comments.

The English bishops are trying to smother the Ordinariate. How long will Rome tolerate this situation?
By Damian Thompson

Here are some quick observations on the Pope’s Ordinariate project, which it’s now clear requires an intervention from Rome if the “second wave” of ex-Anglican converts is to materialise.

1. Archbishop Vincent Nichols does not regard the provision of a main church for the Ordinariate as a priority. Here’s what he said at a recent press conference: “I think that is something probably beyond their resources at the present time, and I don’t think the Ordinariate would thank us, actually, to simply give it responsibility for a church that it would have to then maintain and upkeep.”

2. Most Ordinariate members do regard a main church as a priority. It suits +Vincent to claim that they don’t; perhaps it also suits certain Ordinariate leaders who have been slow off the mark on this one.

3. The English bishops are quietly reinterpreting (ie, ignoring) Benedict XVI’s instructions to them just before he left England last year. They have settled on a policy of incorporating Ordinariate priests into their dioceses and absorbing Ordinariate groups into the parishes where they meet. This policy, dressed up as a “welcome”, undermines the Pope’s vision of an Ordinariate independent of diocesan structures. Nichols is doing nothing to stop his bishops following this sneaky and subversive strategy.  [During the last plenary of the USCCB I watched as bishops discussed how they could use the former-Anglicans of the developing US Ordinariate.]

4. The Vatican is well aware that the English bishops are trying to smother this initiative. The problem is being discussed at a high level. The question is: how will Rome respond?

5. Much depends on the Pope’s state of health. I gather that he is a little frail but essentially healthy for a man of his age. The enemies of the Ordinariate are counting on this pontificate coming to an end before the structures of the English Ordinariate are set in stone.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
27 Comments