Please, during the day today, say prayers for His Holiness Benedict XVI, who turns 87 today.
Thank you, Your Holiness, for all that you did for us and Christ’s Church.
Please, during the day today, say prayers for His Holiness Benedict XVI, who turns 87 today.
Thank you, Your Holiness, for all that you did for us and Christ’s Church.
This was amusing. I really need amusing today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMW-dM-BDu0&feature=player_embedded
Please use the sharing buttons! Thanks!
Registered or not, will you in your charity please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?
Continued from THESE.
I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Many requests are heart-achingly grave and urgent.
As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand. We should support each other in works of mercy.
If you have some prayer requests, feel free to post them below. You have to be registered here to be able to post.
Finally, I still have a pressing personal petition. Actually… two.
From History.com:
Jackie Robinson breaks color barrier
On this day in 1947, Jackie Robinson, age 28, becomes the first African-American player in Major League Baseball when he steps onto Ebbets Field in Brooklyn to compete for the Brooklyn Dodgers. Robinson broke the color barrier in a sport that had been segregated for more than 50 years. Exactly 50 years later, on April 15, 1997, Robinson’s groundbreaking career was honored and his uniform number, 42, was retired from Major League Baseball by Commissioner Bud Selig in a ceremony attended by over 50,000 fans at New York City’s Shea Stadium. Robinson’s was the first-ever number retired by all teams in the league.
[…]
Read the rest there.
I was alerted to this by a Chicagoan friend, a long-suffering Cubs fan It shows how statistics don’t tell the whole story. From NRO:
Not only did Garcia’s teammate, Jose Abreu, slug two home runs against the Indians on Thursday evening, reports Lindsey Foltin of Fox Sports Ohio, he managed to tear open a brand-new ball with another swing.
Abreu’s 439-foot bomb in the second inning of that game came off Danny Salazar. Gammons Daily’s Bill Chuck noted that the 24-year-old fireballer had a most peculiar outing:
Salazar faced just 18 batters [over three and two-thirds innings,] allowing six hits, including two homers and a double, and walked two and permitted five runs.Now here’s the amazing part . . .
He struck out every other batter he faced.
Check out his BABIP yesterday — the White Sox were perfect [1.000].
In the meantime, we should always strive to knock the cover off the ball.
QUAERITUR:
At a local youth rally, the kids were told to confess one of their sin in the confessional. There were multiple priests present along with the bishop.
Are their sins forgiven?
First, if that recounting is accurate, telling people to confession only one sin is WRONG WRONG WRONG!
The bishop present ought to have immediately gone to the microphone to correct that.
I can’t say for sure what God did in regard to what these kids confessed. God gave the Church the ordinary means for the forgiveness of our sins, provided we do what the Church requires. Outside of doing what the Church requires… we get into swampy terrain.
Every sacrament has both form and matter. The form of the Sacrament of Penance is the absolution spoken by a priest with faculties from the Church to absolve. The matter is the telling of sins, all mortal sins, to the best of one’s ability.
If a person deliberately hides known mortal sins during confession, then she is not forgiven.
This situation, however, is complicated by the fact that the kids were told to confess only one sin.
It is entirely possible that these young people have never been properly trained or catechized. Thus, they might do in good faith what they were told, not knowing that it was wrong. What God does with that… I don’t know.
The way to deal with long lines is not to compromise the sacrament! To keep things moving teach people what to confess and how to confess!
So, I don’t know for sure if they were absolved of their sins or not. I suspect not, not in any regular way. I can’t speculate much about what God might grant to them.
The Sacrament of Penance must not be compromised in this way. Priests should never leave people wondering whether or not their sins were absolved. That is why they must teach people to confess all mortal sins both in kind and in number, to confess everything, and to exclude nothing of mortal sins. Then priests must must must use the proper form of absolution as the Church has given it, not making it up, not personalizing it, not elaborating on it.
Just say the black words and do what the red letters say.
From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
I’m an EMHC [Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion] in our Parish. At yesterday’s Mass, I was sitting a pew or two behind a woman who was chugging what I can only assume was a coffee beverage throughout Mass (it was in the cup-size that rhymes with “plenty” from a major coffee chain). She later presented herself to me for communion. As an EMHC, do I have the authority (or responsibility) to charitably refuse to administer communion, since I had reason to believe that she violated the fast? Should I, or should I leave it between her and God?
If I should refuse to offer communion to her and I fail to do so, am I in a state of sin, which should be confessed?
I had pondered this during Mass, and in this situation, I DID administer communion to her because I realized I DIDN’T know the answers to these questions (or even if it was just water in the cup) and, in any case, I DIDN’T know how to charitably do this. [Water doesn’t break the Eucharistic fast.]
I’m asking you, rather than my Parish priest, because based on his previous track record on other, more serious issues, I don’t trust his judgement in this.
First, those occasions wherein EMHC’s are utilized to distribute Holy Communion ought to be rare.
EMHCs should not take upon themselves any determination of whether or not to admit someone to Holy Communion, unless the priest has instructed them to do so, and unless the situation is obvious, e.g., the person is chewing gum, wearing a rainbow sash during a protests, etc.
Ideally the pastor (parish priest) should regularly remind the flock of the necessity of observing the (paltry) 1-hour Communion fast. He should take pains to know his flock so that he can take people aside and remonstrate with them as needed (and also praise them for their fidelity and piety – a good shepherd does both).
In such a situation, you should probably give the woman Holy Communion. Then you should go to Father after Mass and explain the situation, offering the polite suggestion that it might be time to remind people about the fast. That will also give Father the opportunity to explain the situation to you saying,
“Oh, that was Mindy. She has a rare condition that entails a dangerous lack of caffeine in her blood and commercialism in her psyche, so she has permission to drink the forbidden nectar during Mass…”
Meanwhile…
[CUE MUSIC]
If you drink only Mystic Monk Coffee, you get special permissions in the Church, but only if you use my link!
For example, did you know that the drinkers of Mystic Monk Coffee (bought exclusively through Fr Z’s link) have the right to wear the now abolished papal tiara while receiving Holy Communion? True fact! Did you know that, when drinking Mystic Monk Coffee, you are granted the privilege of receiving Communion – within a week and under the usual circumstances – on the MOON? Did you know that Mystic Monk Coffee drinkers using K-Cups are granted an indult to receive Communion in two locations simultaneously when they bilocate?
What are you waiting for?
Mystic Monk Coffee!
It’s swell!
From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
I am invited to my Aunt’s wedding ceremony to her same-sex partner. My family has in the past received conflicting advice from parish priest’s on the issue. One said skip the ceremony and go to the reception; another said to go because you can support the person if not what they are doing. I understand that the Church does not forbid attending invalid weddings, but those responses don’t seem totally satisfactory. What’s your view?
My view… my view….
No.
I think you must not attend either the ceremony or the reception.
This is not like a Catholic and non-Catholic “mixed” marriage situation. Nor it is like a “second marriage” scenario between a man and a woman.
We can’t participate in these situations.
In some cases, as mentioned above, which at least don’t violate natural law and basic common sense, some level of participation could involve attending a reception. But not this, even at the risk of splits in the family.
Moderation queue is ON.
QUAERITUR:
Must the Exultet be sung by a cleric?
Short and simple.
The short answer is: It ought to be.
In the Novus Ordo I believe it is permitted for a non-cleric to sing the Exsultet. I guess that option looks more to the aesthetics of the moment than to the true dignity of the laity and the proper role of the clergy.
In the traditional Roman Rite, the singer must be a deacon or priest. A priest would vest in the dalmatic.
Come to think of it, a bishop could do it. That would be interesting.
The Exsultet, also spelled Exultet, is the liturgical year’s moment for the deacon, par excellence.
I think they are being told to but out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAXJmUqlnUw&feature=player_embedded