1926-2022

1926-2022
Queen from 1952 for 70 years and 7 months.

Requiescat in pace.

Remember your own mortality.

Go to confession.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION | Tagged
11 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 556, etc.

Planning to move? Real Estate For Life can help you find a pro-life agent who will give some of the commission to a pro-life cause.

Yesterday was a day off in the Sinquefield Cup in St. Louis.  They coagulate again today and I am sure that enhanced “security” will still be applied.   Magnus still has not clarified what he did or why.

Meanwhile, 50 years ago…. no this doesn’t have anything to do with the Fischer-Spassky Match.  It is a fascinating puzzle which appeared 50 years ago.  I found it in an issue of the Marshall [Club in NYC] Spectator.

White to move and mate in 3.  However, it can be done several ways, including by castling.* Mate by castling.  Very cool.  But this is far cooler than you might imagine.  Remember, this was 50 years ago.  Since then FIDE laws of Chess have changed somewhat, and it may be that positions such as this are a reason why.  I’ll get you started.

1.e7…

*At the time this puzzle was published, the official definition of castling – which is a king move – was that if neither the king nor the rook has moved, and the king is neither in check nor would be passing over a guarded square, then the rook can move to the square adjacent to the king and the king can “hop” over the rook.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 555, etc., wherein 64 square drama continueth with videos

The other day I took some of this wonderful beer to a gathering and it was very well received.  It is really good with savory things, such as sausages and cheeses.  Really good.

The drama continues in St. Louis.  Yesterday, the controversial Hans Niemann eked out a draw with Leinier Dominguez Perez.  After the game he did a video interview wherein eventually “the issue” came up: accusations of cheating.  Start at 8:15.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

This whole terrible situation was stirred up by Magnus Carlsen.

It is interesting that Chess.com suspended Niemann’s account.

It is interesting that Chess.com and Carlsen’s business interests in the Play Magnus Group announced a merger.

In even more drama, it seems that, as reported by internet dominant Chess.com that a defamation lawsuit launched against Netflix by GM Nona Gaprindashvili (now 81) was settled, but we are not sure how. In the fictional hit series based on the 1983 novel The Queen’s Gambit a claim was made that Gaprindashvili had never played against men, which was false. The series, by the way, was very good. I have not read the book. The ending credits of the series were spectacular. The music is by Carlos Rafael Rivera.  Two minutes of mind-bending.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Meanwhile, black to move.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 555, etc., high drama

High chess drama in St Louis yesterday where the Sinquefield Cup is underway with some of the best players in the world… except…

Yesterday the arguably-best-player-ever, Magnus Carlsen, stunned everyone by withdrawing from the tourney with a cryptic comment intimating that he thought one of the opponents, namely Hans Niemann, was cheating.  Niemann had beaten Carlsen the day before with black, but his after game interview comments were… weird.  Also, some time back Niemann did, in fact, cheat in online play, and admitted it.  He also had fairly recently a rather amazing leap in his rating, hundreds of points.  Thus the chess world exploded all day yesterday.  Carlsen’s games were blotted from the competition though not from ratings.  Carlsen has never withdrawn from a tournament, even when sick.  He didn’t quit because he had lost.  As the players entered for round 4 they were carefully wanded and checked with an RF detector used to find listening devices, trackers, hidden cameras, etc.

A variant of this.

These are handy for hotel rooms, etc.  I have one.  HERE

Also, for yesterday’s round another anti-cheating measure was employed: the transmission of the games was delayed by 15 minutes.  That means that any communication with the outside world would result in critical time loss on the cheaters clock, a serious deterrent.

The game between Caruana and MLV is worth a peak.  One commentator quoted Tartakower who had said that the winner is the one who makes the next-to-last mistake.  That is a pretty good reminder for how life works, too.

The daily puzzle at Chess.com was a little tricky.  It’s white’s move.  A couple pieces are hanging.  What to do?

Meanwhile, in the Roman Martyrology today we learn that it is the Feast of St. Zachary, Old Testament Prophet.

Posted in Chess |
7 Comments

“What, Papa, is ‘Jesuit’?” – “I think you’d better ask your Mother.”

From the might pen of Fr. Hunwicke comes this gem.  You should immediately go also to read the comments.  In case you don’t know already, Christine Mohrmann demonstrated in her 1957 masterpiece Liturgical Latin that in the early Roman Church the Latin that was spoken by the people in the streets and the Latin used in worship were not the same.  Hence, the argument that, today, the language of the worship should be of the same register as the language commonly spoken (and hence up for constant revision) is, essentially, rubbish.  This falsehood is still, like a noxious worm, tormenting us today.

November 20 Anno Domini 2121: a family dialogue
A favourite of some appreciative readers, reprinted by request with one or two tinkerings.

Literate and Latinate six-year-old: Papa, why, this morning, was the psalmody of the Mass in honour of St Pius X so odd? I mean, in the psalmus of the Introit, why did we have Gratias Domini in aeternum cantabo, rather than Misericordias …? And why has ecclesia been replaced with coetus?
Papa: Well, my child, when that Mass was added to the Missal, the Holy See was rather keen on the Bea psalter.
Literate …: What was the Bea, Papa?
Papa: It was an evil German Jesuit who …
Literate …: What, Papa, is ‘Jesuit’?
Papa: I think you’d better ask your Mother … not many people nowadays know the answer to that question … I’m not sure I do … but the Bea had acquired the confidence of Pius XII …
Literate … (fiercely): Ah, the pope who appointed Hasdrubal Bugnini who engineered the Great Liturgical Deformation of the twentieth century?
Papa: Exactly, best beloved, except that his name was Hannibal … Hasdrubal was his brother … sort of … perhaps I have allowed you to read too much Livy … and the Bea began its evil work by doing a new translation of the Psalter into Classical Latin and …
Literate …: But surely, Papa carissime, St Christine Mohrmann, the great Dutch Latinist and Doctrix of the Church, had just demonstrated that Liturgical Latin was an exquisite deeply Christian form of Latin expressly crafted to convey in all its transcendent beauty the Catholic Faith?
Papa: Indeed she had, but Pius XII, a weak and foolish pope, ignored her scholarship and allowed the Bea to do its worst. And …
Literate …: But, Papa, consider the rendering coetus. It is profoundly wrong. Because the Vulgate rendering ecclesia binds together the Church’s appropriation of Scripture with the text of the Old Testament. Coetus elides that linkage. Be honest with me, pedantic Parent: Coetus also ruptures the link with the Septuagintal rendering … ekklesia megale. Thus the harmony of the Hebrew, the Greek, and the Latin is rudely sundered! So why was today’s Mass not subsequently corrected when St Benedict XVII completed the Great Liturgical and Doctrinal Restoration in 2031 by promulgating the Sixteen Definitive Anathemas against Bergoglianism?
Papa: Because the liturgy, learned offspring, bears within it marks of all the periods through which, in its triumphant march across the centuries, it has passed. These profoundly eccentric details provide a powerful incentive to historical research such as that upon which you, after your Seventh Birthday, will embark. Now run along and finish your doctoral thesis on the de Beatificatione et Canonizatione of St Benedict XIV. Then you can ask your Mother what ‘Jesuit’ means before I read you your bed-time story from the newly recovered papyrus text, Oxyrhynchus 26,091, of the Hecale of Callimachus.
Literate …: Thank you, Papa. I warmly anticipate each of those three agenda.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
8 Comments

Concerning the “bipolar pontificate”

For some years now, Andrea Gagliarducci has issued a weekly news/analysis column called Monday Vatican.   This week is a must read.  HERE

Excerpts…

Pope Francis and the paradox of the Council

[…]

Pope Francis wants to be the Pope who puts the Council into practice.

[…]

For [secretary of the Council of Cardinals, Bp Marco] Mellino, the fact that the laity can cooperate in government means they can take part in the government that the bishops take part in by vocation.

This interpretation is widely contested. Before the Consistory, interventions on the subject by cardinals Antonio Rouco Varela, Marc Ouellet, and even Walter Kasper had been disseminated. Everyone questioned that this decision to centralize everything in the hands of the Pope ultimately, even the distribution of power, was in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council.

Even the historian Alberto Melloni had denounced the anti-conciliar turn of Pope Francis, who, instead of delegating, increasingly centers his powers on himself.

[…]

[I]t was the Second Vatican Council that, intending to return to the sacramental nature of the Church, defined that the sacred powers of the bishops, even before being jurisdictional, concerned not only those of sanctifying and teaching but also that of governing.

[…]

Also, this is paradoxical if we consider that Pope Francis wants to link everything to the correct reception of the Second Vatican Council. Indeed, the Pope is particularly ferocious on these issues, especially regarding the liturgy.

The Traditionis Custodes, which cancels all the concessions made on the celebration of the ancient rite, was justified by the Pope as the need to apply the Council, and with the emphasis that the Council must be received in every part because it is the life of the Church.

If this is the way of thinking, what is one to think of the consequences of the Praedicate Evangelium? Can’t the Constitution itself jeopardize the reception of the Council?

It may be easy to argue that liturgy and government are very different issues. But however different they are, the underlying principle remains the same. In the end, there is a contradiction.

This contradiction, after all, pervades many actions of Pope Francis’ pontificate. There is an impulsive Pope and a less impulsive Pope, like two sides of the same coin, which create a fluid and bipolar pontificate and, therefore, one difficult to interpret.

[…]

Now, the Second Vatican Council is the guideline of every inspection, every provision, even harsh ones by the Pope. Yet it is profoundly questioned on one of its foundations by an apostolic constitution written “by trial and error,” and with the awareness that it will have to be substantially amended.

Meanwhile, Pope Francis has decided to bring his cardinals together to present them with a fait accompli.

[…]

The Consistory, after all, was a “noncistory.” It is a college that seems more to be an electoral committee than an actual advisory body of the Pope, though many said that the discussion in the groups were lively and free and that nobody felt pressures. Indeed, there is almost a fear of speaking openly.

[…]

Posted in The Drill | Tagged ,
27 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 554, etc. including a whopper

This is from a tweet.  The painting was being worked on by restorers.

Things are looking grim for black. But it’s black’s move.

UPDATE:

So that you know, for sure, what we are up against (only figuratively, thanks be to God).  From the cesspool that is Twitter.

This is total B as in B, S as in S.  However, according to the Big Lie Theory, if you tell a lie, make it a) a big one b) repeat it often.  The idea is that, eventually, people will start to doubt their correct inclination that they are being lied to and will then wonder if, since the liars are not relenting, maybe what they are told is … maybe… maybe?… true.

The “underlying message” of the BIBLE is “inclusion” of … sodomy?

 

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, Sin That Cries To Heaven |
11 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 553, etc.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

4 Sept: St. Moses, Old Testament lawgiver and prophet

Today is the feast of St. Moses, lawgiver and prophet in the Old Testament.

Many people do not realize that may Old Testament figures are considered by Holy Mother Church to be saints. Many of them are listed in editions of the Roman Martyrology, both pre-Conciliar and post.

Here is today’s entry for Moses.

1. Commemoratio sancti Moysis, prophetae, quem Deus elegit, ut populum in Aegypto oppressum liberaret et in terram promissionis adduceret; cui etiam in monte Sina sese revelavit dicens: “Ego sum qui sum”, atque legem proposuit, quae vitam populi electi regeret.  Ille servus Dei in monte Nebo terrae Moab coram terra promissionis plenus dierum obiit.

Anyone want to take a crack at What The Martyrology Really Says?

Also, a question/request to readers:

Have any of you ever seen a stained-glass window of Moses at the cleft in the rock in Exodus 33?

I would like a good photo.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols |
3 Comments

La Macchina di Santa Rosa 2022!

Some years ago I went to Viterbo for the Feast of Santa Rosa and the incredible spectacle of the Macchina di Santa Rosa.

Here is some video from this year.  Yes, this is being carried by a bunch of men.  HERE and HERE and HERE

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool | Tagged
Comments Off on La Macchina di Santa Rosa 2022!