Daily Rome Shot 92

Photo by Bree Dail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 92

PRAYER REQUEST

Kind readers… may I ask a prayer from you to St. Joseph?

I suggest the Litany, but … please… anything.

Posted in PRAYER REQUEST | Tagged
44 Comments

ASK FATHER: Mass intention register … in Latin

From a seminarian:

First, many prayers for you always!

Second, many of us at the seminary are looking for a personal mass intention book to keep record of masses. Preferably we have seen a red version that is labeled in Latin and is of a higher quality than what we can find online. Any ideas where we could find them?

You are looking for is the “Missarum diarium et onera“. I got one in Rome at the bookstore Ancora near to St. Peter’s.  It’s in Latin.  Hard cover. Medium sized.  Enough entries probably for a lifetime of a priest’s personal intentions. Not expensive.

Not that useful.

The version I got isn’t all that practical for, for me at least.

It is quite Roman, in the sense that it is intended for a sacristy at a church where in the church or chapel or crypt, etc., there are multiple altars.  There is an indication about which altar the Mass was intended for or fulfilled at (doesn’t specify) – “Altare”.  There is an entry for the church – “Ecclesia”.   There is an entry for place – “Locus”, which I suppose could mean town.

In sum, it is a strange set of items that hearkens to an earlier day, when multiple priests were at a church saying Masses through the day at different altars.  That’s what we see still at, thanks be to God, Ss. Trinita dei Pellegrini in Rome, but not many other places.  And even in that place, this book wouldn’t be that helpful, since the Mass books in Roman churches basically need the priest’s name and diocese/institute/order and the date he said Mass.  Otherwise, it could be for a religious community of priests, whose community receives intentions at their HQ or mother house.  The intentions are distributed to priests in the field.  The priests report back to HQ that intention was celebrated, for example, #9867 was celebrated by Fr. Sven O’Brien, SNARL*, at the Altar of St Christine the Astonishing at Mournful Mother Weeping Church in Black Duck, which is privileged and indulgenced.  Back at HQ, old Br. Diligens gets the notification, looks up #9867, marks it as fulfilled on thus and such a date and, if there is need to send a notification to the one who requested the Mass, takes care of business.  Such a registry reflects the seriousness of intentions and also days when there were many many more priests.

Newer books are a little more practical for the priest who keeps track of his own intentions, apart from the parish, etc.   They also include an entry for “No.” and the usual things like “Date”, the intention, the amount of the stiped, the date the offering was made (because the law requires that intentions be fulfilled within a prescribed time or on the day that was agreed), a slot for the name of the one who made the offering.  Sometimes a narrow column for a indication such as living or deceased or perhaps the type of Mass (Low, Sung, Solemn, Requiem).

These books could be a lot better.

In my copy, I just write pertinent stuff, every other line being a new entry, and cross them out with red when I fulfil the obligation.

NB: I’d like to have some priests chime in on this with their experience.   I’ve seen some priests/parish simply use a yearly liturgical calendar book for their territory as their record of intentions.  Others have databases, no doubt.

Fathers… what would YOU like to see in such a book?  What would be your categories?

*Societatis Nobilis Agentium in Rebus Liturgicis (aka The Liturgy Secret Police)

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ACTION ITEM!, Canon Law, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
1 Comment

Rome Shot 91

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

Rome Shot 90

Photo by Bree Dail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on Rome Shot 90

POLL: Who is Pope? – UPDATES

UPDATE 4 March 17:00 EST

Some post-poll house-cleaning.

First, I am going to reduce some of the screen shot, so this post isn’t so overloaded.

Next, Ann Barnhardt had a wrap-up about the poll at here place. HERE She has some pointed comments.

UPDATE 3 March 17:00 EST

The poll is closed.  5250 votes

_______Published on: Mar 1, 2021

At Canon212 there is an interesting poll.  I mention it here to expand the sample size.  (Maybe others could do that when I post a poll?!? Maybe?)

The poll question:

Who is the Pope?

This is not about whom you wish were Pope.

This is about who IS Pope right now. HERE

UPDATE: 1 March 2320 EST

Now…

Neither?  Those are the serious outliers.

UPDATE 2 March 10:00 EST

It looks a doubling in all choices except for Francis, which grew more.

UPDATE 2 March 22:00 EST

Some of you can do the math.  Does it look rather consistent?

UPDATE 3 March 10:00 EST

UPDATE 3 March 1400 EST

UPDATE 3 March 1700 EST _ FINAL RESULTS

To my untrained eye,

F 12% Not sure 8% B 70%
F 22% B 62%
F 26% B 57%
F 24% B 60%
F 23%  Not sure 6% B 59%
F 23%  Not sure 6% B 59%

A problem: it seems that you can vote more than once in the same “session”.

It would be interesting to see this poll on a “lib” site (though lib site traffic is negligible).

Alright… everyone get back to work.

Posted in Benedict XVI, Francis, POLLS | Tagged ,
28 Comments

ACTION ITEM! Support for an important relic apostolate.

From a reader comes a good suggestion.

Let me just add…

I’m Fr. Z and I endorse this message.

Hi Father Z.
Happy Lent and thanks for all you do!

I wonder if it might be possible for you to put a mention of Father Carlos Martins and the Treasures of the Church Relics? Father Carlos is out and about doing Lent Missions right now (he did one at our parish). I’m told there was a miracle healing a couple days ago, as he was giving a Mission at St. Patrick’s in Long Island area. Anyway, I ask this because the relics ministry he does is in need of donations to continue. I know your readers are very generous to worthy causes, and this certainly is a worthy cause. If you think you could manage it, I would be grateful. I’m sure Father Martins would be too!
https://www.treasuresofthechurch.com/

I know Fr. Martins personally.  I know his apostolate.  It is worth supporting.

For example, Fr. Martins was responsible for bringing the body of St. Maria Goretti to these USA a couple of years back.

Give him a boost!

Posted in ACTION ITEM! | Tagged
3 Comments

PJM: “Vatican Betrays Virgin Mary for Prophet Muhammad”

PJ Media reports something really alarming.

Vatican Betrays Virgin Mary for Prophet Muhammad by BY RAYMOND IBRAHIM (serious guy)

The same folks to bring you “Abrahamism”—the idea that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are intricately connected—have narrowed their sights on promoting Mary, the mother of Christ, as “a Jewish, Christian and Muslim woman,” in the words of Catholic priest Fr. Gian Matteo of the Pontifical International Marian Academy. In a ten-week webinar series titled “Mary, a model for faith and life for Christianity and Islam,” the academy will seek to present Mary as a bridge between the two religions.

This may be easier said than done — at least for those still interested in facts. For starters, the claim that Mary was a “Jewish, Christian and Muslim woman” is only two-thirds true: yes, she was a Jew by race and background; and yes, she was a Christian in that she literally birthed Christ(ianity); but she was most certainly not a Muslim — a term and religion that came into being 600 years after Mary died.

Worse, far from being the Eternal Virgin, as she is for 1.5 billion Christians of the Catholic and Orthodox variety, Islam presents Mary, the Mother of Christ, as “married” to and “copulating” with Muhammad in paradise — a depiction that would seem to sever rather than build “bridges.”

[…]

I don’t want to include the next part, which is a little upsetting. However, the article goes on to explain how deeply troubling this move would be.

Posted in Our Solitary Boast | Tagged ,
26 Comments

Rome Shot 89

Photo by Bree Dail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

An emeritus here, an emeritus there. Pretty soon you’re talking about a lot of popes.

From Newsmax:

Francis gave an book length interview to an Argentinian journalist. He said, apparently, “I will be pope, either active or emeritus, and in Rome. I will not return to Argentina.”

Francis is a high-risk candidate for COVID.

Note the openness to being “emeritus”.

Meanwhile, at Corriere della sera, the Pope now considered “emeritus”, gave a short interview. English account at CNA gives a brief summary of scrambled, incoherent piece at Corriere.   At some point in the interview Benedict must have said the piece’s opening line, “Non ci sono due Papi.  Il Papa e uno solo… (ellipsis in the original)”, that is, “There are not two Popes.  The Pope is one only….”  What was in the ellipsis?

Benedict seem to have stood by his decision to resign.  “Credo di avere fatto bene”, which is a little ambiguous.  It can mean, “I think I did well (to have done it)” or “(I think I did it (the resignation) well”, although for the latter, I would have said, “Credo di averlo fatto bene”.   But maybe he did say that.   The reporter says that Benedict’s voice was veil thin, came and went, and that Gänswein sometime repeated/interpreted.

TWO emeriti?

???????!

Posted in Benedict XVI, Lighter fare |
8 Comments