SHOPPING ONLINE? Please, come here first!
About this blog…
“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
Fr. Z’s Podcasts RSS Feed
- The most evident mark of God’s anger and the most terrible castigation He can inflict upon the world are manifested when He permits His people to fall into the hands of clerics who are priests more in name than in deed, priests who practice the cruelty of ravening wolves rather than the charity and affection of devoted shepherds.
St. John Eudes
Recent Comments
- ProfessorCover on ASK FATHER: A point about papal pronouncements and the truth: “Way before I became a Catholic, a Catholic friend of mine, who in 1968 had graduated from the College of…”
- FRLBJ on How many times have written on this blog…: “Just attended the heavenly liturgy at St. Joseph today. Such a privilige and a grace!!”
- Venerator Sti Lot on WDTPRS – 5th Sunday after Easter (V.O.): Liturgical goop. Wherein Fr. Z rants.: “Thank you for this! It is fine to read your accents on “exitus”, “conversio”, and “reditus” in this collect when…”
- BeatifyStickler on How many times have written on this blog…: “Thank you for saying it all these years.”
- jhogan on How many times have written on this blog…: “Interesting article in Crisis. So much in “modern” church architecture is unremarkable and ordinary; if the liturgy celebrated there is…”
Federated Computer… your safe and private alternative to big biz corporations that hate us while taking our money and mining our data. Have an online presence large or small? Catholic DIOCESE? Cottage industry? See what Federated has to offer. Save money and gain peace of mind.
“Until the Lord be pleased to settle, through the instrumentality of the princes of the Church and the lawful ministers of His justice, the trouble aroused by the pride of a few and the ignorance of some others, let us with the help of God endeavor with calm and humble patience to render love for hatred, to avoid disputes with the silly, to keep to the truth and not fight with the weapons of falsehood, and to beg of God at all times that in all our thoughts and desires, in all our words and actions, He may hold the first place who calls Himself the origin of all things.”
- Prosper of Aquitaine (+c.455), De gratia Dei et libero arbitrio contra Collatorem 22.61
Do you want to show some appreciation?
Polls
ABORTION PILL RESCUE NETWORK
Your support is important. Thanks in advance.
To donate monthly I prefer Zelle because it doesn't extract fees. Use
frz AT wdtprs DOT comDonate using VENMO
GREAT BEER from Traditional Benedictine Monks in Italy
Good coffee and tea. Help monks.
CLICK and say your daily offerings!
I use this when I travel both in these USA and abroad. Very useful. Fast enough for Zoom. I connect my DMR (ham radio) through it. If you use my link, they give me more data. A GREAT back up.
Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!
Don’t rely on popes, bishops and priests.
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”- Fulton Sheen
Therefore, ACTIVATE YOUR CONFIRMATION and get to work!
Send Snail Mail to Fr. Z
Fr John Zuhlsdorf
Tridentine Mass Society of Madison
733 Struck St.
PO BOX 44603
Madison, WI 53744-4603
For email HERE
- “The modern habit of doing ceremonial things unceremoniously is no proof of humility; rather it proves the offender's inability to forget himself in the rite, and his readiness to spoil for every one else the proper pleasure of ritual.”
- C.S. Lewis
This blog has to earn its keep!
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
To donate monthly I prefer Zelle because it doesn't extract fees. Use
frz AT wdtprs DOT comAs for Latin…
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
-
Recent Posts
- How many times have written on this blog…
- WDTPRS – 5th Sunday after Easter (V.O.): Liturgical goop. Wherein Fr. Z rants.
- ASK FATHER: A point about papal pronouncements and the truth
- WHEREIN FR. Z offers a new project: rescue, restore a spectacular set of vestments – UPDATED
- ROME 26/5– Day 46: Details and a Bell
- ROME 26/5– Day 45: Fr. Z gives you the bird
- 8 May – Happy Feast of Mary… under which title?
- 8 May – Indulgence for the Supplication to Our Lady of Pompeii (twice a year)
- ROME 26/5– Day 44: I didn’t expect roses.
- REVIEW: New biography of the late and truly great Michael Davies
- ROME 26/5– Day 43: Res clamat Domino
- If “full communion” with Rome requires full acceptance of ALL of Vatican II, then, by that standard, many Catholics are lacking “full communion”
- “The law speaks of brotherhood and fatherhood. Many priests experience managerialism and abandonment.”
- Be sure to take in Diana Montagna’s “Substack” today
- ROME 26/5– Day 42: Keeping up my end
- ROME 26/5– Day 41: Groovy
- St. Monica, her incipient alcoholism, the intervention that saved her. WORLD HISTORY CHANGING in an INSTANT!
- Three Precious “Moments of Sharing” in Fr. Z’s Neighborhood
- I must post this. And then I have a mind experiment for you.
- Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 4th Sunday after Easter (N.O. 5th Sunday OF Easter)
- ROME 26/5– Day 39 & 40: A True Scoundrel
- WDTPRS – 5th Sunday of Easter (Novus Ordo): The prayer’s very word order reveals God’s love – UPDATED/CORRECTED
- WDTPRS – 4th Sunday after Easter (Vetus Ordo): “The smoke of Satan has entered into the temple of God”
- ROME 26/5– Day 39: Evviva San Giuseppe!
- ROME 26/4– Day 38: Jasmine news (not the Jesuit)
- Bishop wants to ordained married men because “pastoral emergency”. Could you repeat that?
- Report from the ground: Charlotte
- “I am the good shepherd”
- ROME 26/4– Day 37: trading places
- Fr. McTeigue asks for a novena of reparation for the Anglican … thing… in Rome
Let us pray…
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
PLEASE RESPOND. Pretty pleeeease?
WDTPRS POLL
Plus ça change
Some progressivists think that mankind has progressed to the point where we can reinterpret the Scriptures for our time in a way that contradicts their meaning, that we are mature now and we don’t have to kneel before God, that our advancement gives us the right to manipulate even the building blocks of nature.
Really, we aren’t “maturing” out of some previous form of humanity. Men and women are pretty much the same in the basic details of life as they were a long time ago, accounting of course for technical advancements.
Here is a great tweet I spotted this morning that drives the point home.
Just a letter from 2270 years ago – but only left side
“I hear you got up too soon and had a relapse. Please try to recover as fast as possible, take good care, regain your health and let us know if you need any help”@BLMedieval Papyrus 2678 #Health #BeKind #MondayMotivation pic.twitter.com/nsCAcF4Q28
— peter toth (@petetoth) March 8, 2021
The first oak selected for the new spire of Notre-Dame de Paris
Back in the day, far sighted people planted groves of trees for use decades in the future. Even the US Navy still does this, for the sake of USS Constitution. I remember in The Cardinal, the little parish Steve was sent to had a grove of trees that came in handy in hard times.
A friend sent a story today that the first oak tree of 1000 was selected for the rebuilding of the spire and roof of Notre-Dame de Paris. HERE
Some trees will be from state land and others from private land.
The trees will be cut up and stored for 12 to 18 months to prepare them for use in the reconstruction phase which is set to begin in autumn 2022, allowing for a planned reopening of the cathedral in April 2024.
Talk about the best fate a tree could have.
Think about the acorn falling where it did, the tree growing through all that time, to wind up as part of Notre-Dame. Our lives are a little like that, in that we can’t see at the moment where we will wind up. But God in His providence knows. If we are trying to do His will, we are where we are supposed to be. We are the team He selected for these troubling times.
Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 3rd Sunday of Lent 2021
Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at the Mass for your Sunday (obligation or none), either live or on the internet? Let us know what it was.
Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.
Also, are your churches opening up? What was attendance like?
I’ve been on the road, but I got back for Sunday Mass at the parish.
A different compendium
Yesterday, I posted about Socci’s views on who the true Pope may be. HERE. A couple days ago, I posted about the new highly critical Compendium about the odd teachings of Francis, HERE. In that post, I said that, if someone had a contrary view let him come up with his own compendium favorable toward Francis.
Today I received a link to a blog called Roma Locuta Est written by Steven O’Reilly, which has a compendium not about how wonderful Francis is (the challenge I issued) but rather responding to the claims of Socci and our friend Ann Barnhardt that Benedict is the true Pope. For the sake of fairness and for the sake of the mind-exercise I invited you all into, it seems good to share the link: HERE. Socci has his arguments, and Ann hers. Others opine as well. This fellow has his view: even though Francis has been sowing confusing and division, he really is the Pope. In the linked post he summarizes his position and then provides a compendium of the articles he has written on the topic.
You can go there, read, and decide for yourself who is right.
Sigh.
That last thing I typed stops me in my own tracks. “Decide for yourself….”
When it comes to the papacy we really shouldn’t have to be in this position.
But what are we supposed to do?
When we see really strange things going on, are we simply suppose to disengage our brains and stop thinking? Blindly accept claims in a time when – rather often – we find that our leaders are liars or complicit in nefarious things? God gave us reason. God also offers us graces, including the gift of Faith. God gave us a Church with the Petrine Ministry as a constitutive element to help us get to heaven.
I go back an forth with myself about the question of the papacy today. On the one hand, the question doesn’t have a huge impact on my (or your) daily life. We have our Catholic lives to live. The name of the Pope might come up once a day if you go to daily Mass. But that’s about it. For centuries most people had no idea even who the Pope was, even his name, and they lived their lives and went about their business without worrying about it. Hence, I will sometimes suggest to people that if they are really upset by this question, they should leave it aside and go do something else.
On the other hand, I am haunted by the clear teaching of the Lord about obedience to authority, even authority that is corrupt. In Matthew 23:2-3 Our Lord says:
“The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat; so practice and observe whatever they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach, but do not practice.”
In this chapter Christ condemns in the strongest terms the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and their teachings, while telling his disciples to submit to them because they sit on the “seat (kathedra) of Moses”, that is, they have the authority to teach. Looking at the Greek, the Lord uses the same words that undergird Peter’s authority to bind and loose, which gives us an insight into what Christ meant for Peter’s authority. The question of what Christ meant in Matthew 23 is complex and fascinating, but at least we can say that His view was that obedience was owed even to lousy leaders. Given that, yes, it really is important to know who has legitimate authority, the kathedra, today, especially since modern means of communication shoves information “the Vatican”, “the Pope” down our ears, noses and throats in great gobs.
It’s nearly impossible to ignore.
Since God gave us reason, I say, let us use it. Prayerfully.
Perhaps if you are going to delve into these issues at all, it would be good to start with prayers. First, use the so-called internet prayer when you get online. Then, if you come to a thorny question, ask your Guardian Angel to guide you to and through what you find in a way that is helpful, not hurtful. This world has its prince, the “father of lies”, who wants you confused and divided, mired in falsehood and without the use of reason. Don’t get into it with the forces of evil. Be vigilant and disciplined in your looking at these troubling topics. Leave them aside if you must.
Some of us must pay close attention to these things. That doesn’t mean that everyone does.
Finally, I conclude with something that I have offered more than once in the past.
In the large arc of time, Popes come and go. Councils are called and concluded. Some of these Popes and Councils are important and some of them are not so important. Some of them were better than others. Some of them have great impact still today, others not so much. Not every Pope or Council was equally important, or good. Time will tell.
So don’t get overly concerned even about today’s goings on, which are ephemeral. Yes, we are living in them, so they are pressing on us, but our goal is ultimately heaven, not an eternal prolongation of an earthly life wherein we see only as if through glass, darkly.
In the New Creation, all things will be made new.
15 Comments
Another “We are our rites!” rant from Fr. Z
At Crisis there is a piece by Paul Krause which knocks one out of the park. He writes about reverence in worship. His starting point is a Christological view of anthropology and, therefore, the virtue of Religion (though he doesn’t use those specific labels).
From the onset he makes a good point. :
The desire for reverence is not the desire for a valid Mass….
There is a minimalist tendency among some Catholics.
In libs it manifests itself in the desire to twist, bend, force the liturgy into their own image, so long as it remains valid. This is an element in the lib desire constantly to dumb-down the Mass for immediate comprehension by the lowest common denominator in the pews without effort or discomfort. (I’m reminded of those who promote the diabolical “rapture” theory, which seeks to remove the need to embrace the Cross from salvation.) The result is the reduction of the supernatural to the nature which is the essence of that doctrine from Hell, modernism.
It has its manifestation among trads who focus too much on questions like “What’s the latest I can arrive at Mass and still fulfil my obligation or go to Communion?” Sometimes that is a real, practical point. If it takes over and becomes a matter of regular practice, that’s bad. This too can strip the Mass of the essential register of the mystery which transforms us. Again, the immanent supersedes the transcendent.
Catholics who have a true Christian spirit want more not less in their sacred liturgical worship. This fundamental truth reflects the reality that “we are our rites”. It reflects the dynamic interchange of worship, belief and conduct of life. Of course, because Christ is all in all, we make adjustments for the ascetic worship of individual Cistercians and Carthusians… who when gathered aren’t that minimalist at all.
Let’s see some of Krause’s argument. Keep in mind my labels of Christological anthropology (understanding who man is by contemplating Christ) and the virtue of Religion (what we owe to God as God, which is primarily worship). My emphases:
[…]
Part of the fundamental truth of the Catholic religion is not merely the recognition that Christ is present in the Eucharist, but the awareness that we ourselves are temples of the Lord and part of the Body of Christ. Every Catholic is an instantiated extension of the Body of Christ in this world. This is why Catholic ethics are “tough.” The heart of Catholic ethics centers not on forbiddance or restrictions but on dignity, on virtue. This body of mine, as St. Paul says, is not really mine but the Lord’s. We do well to heed this truth and not defile, therefore, the Body of Christ. St. Augustine, to my mind, offered up the greatest expression of the full appreciation of this reality: “Let us rejoice then and give thanks that we have become not only Christians, but Christ himself. Do you understand and grasp, brethren, God’s grace toward us?” [Leo the Great at Christmas: “O Christian! Recognize your dignity!”]
It equally does us well to remember that when we enter church we also enter into the presence of Christ. For Christ is also present in the Tabernacle located in every church. To enter any Catholic church is to enter into another instantiated extension of the Body of Christ. How beautiful it is that the Body of Christ is assembled together in such a unity.
But since we have become Christ and Christ dwells in the church, why, then, is it too much to ask for the recognition of this through the very church itself and the liturgy which is meant to express that appreciated worship? Just as we ought not to defile the Body of Christ through all the myriad means by which one can defile the Body, this principle should naturally be extended to the church in which Christ is present.
[…]
Since we are instantiations of Christ, individually and collectively, we defile ourselves and the mystical Person of Christ, through unworthy sacred worship.
Liturgical abuses defile ourselves, even those Christians not present, because we belong to the Person of Christ. We also defile through minimalism or half-assed efforts. Naturally we have to be guided by the virtues of prudence and moderation in ramping up our liturgical spaces and accouterment. We have to be guided by what St. Thomas Aquinas wrote and sang: quantum potes tantum aude! Dare to do as much as you are able! That prompts us always to be improving, not just resting complacent. It also tells us to do so according to the golden mean of our means, balanced against other responsibilities as Christians, especially regarding works of mercy.
You who have been around here for while know about my analogy for the Novus Ordo and the TLM along the lines of Paul’s analogy of spiritual food for children and for adults. It is uncharitable to force children to eat what their bodies are not yet ready to take. Their nourishment needs and the form of the nourishment must be determined by what is truly good for them, not merely by our whim or will. It is also uncharitable to refuse to feed the mature anything other than the pabulum proper and good for the young. We make progress in the spiritual life. We have to make progress in our liturgical life as well. We must not be minimalist or complacent. And people should not be held down, their spiritual and liturgical maturation prohibited through the denial of what is good for them.
Why?
We are our rites! We reflect them. They shape us.
Check out the whole of the piece at Crisis.
WDTPRS – 3rd Sunday of Lent (2002MR): Two wings of prayer
WARNING BELOW…
Roman Station: St. Lawrence outside the walls
An examination of our conscience is a humbling experience. When we look to see who really are inside, we can have different reactions. Sometimes we find things which frighten and discourage us. If we are weak in our habits and our faith, that inveterate enemy of ours souls, the Devil who is “father of lies” will rub us raw with our ugliness tempting us to lose hope about the possibility of living a moral life or, in extreme cases, about our salvation.
On a less dramatic plane, falling down in our Lenten resolve on one day can cause a collapse of our will so that we will “flag” and give up.
This is why the Lenten discipline is so important. By it we learn to govern our appetites, examine our consciences, do penance, and learn the habits which are virtues. On the other hand, a recognition of sins and failures will “incline” us to call with humble confidence upon the mercy of God who paid the price for our salvation.
Today’s Collect taken from the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary for Saturday of the 4th week of Lent, has many Lenten elements and only a close look at the words can unlock what it really says.
COLLECT – LATIN TEXT (2002MR):
Deus, omnium misericordiarum et totius bonitatis auctor,
qui peccatorum remedia
in ieiuniis, orationibus et eleemosynis demonstrasti,
hanc humilitatis nostrae confessionem propitius intuere,
ut, qui inclinamur conscientia nostra,
tua semper misericordia sublevemur.
ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
Father,
you have taught us to overcome our sins
by prayer, fasting and works of mercy.
When we are discouraged by our weakness,
give us confidence in your love.
Does this properly translate the Latin? Bets, anyone?
Misericordia means generally “tender-heartedness, pity, compassion, mercy”. In the plural, as we find it today, it refers to works of mercy. We find both a plural and a singular in today’s prayer and we must make a distinction between them. Our bulky and bountiful Lewis & Short Dictionary explains that bonitas is the “good quality of a thing” and also various benevolent and virtuous behaviors. When referring to a parent, bonitas means “parental love, tenderness.” Demonstro indicates, “to point out” as with the finger, “indicate, designate, show.” Demonstrasti is a “syncopated” form for demonstravisti, which helps the prayer to flow. The L&S states that inclino means, “to cause to lean, bend, incline, turn.” In a more neutral sense it signifies, “to bend, turn, incline, decline, sink.” By extension it means, “to decline, as in a fever, or sink down in troubles”, but it can also mean, more rarely, “to change, alter from its former condition”. We are all at sea with this word, so we turn to Souter’s A Glossary of Later Latin and find “to humble”. This is probably the direction we must go. Sublevo literally means to lift up from beneath, to raise up, hold up, support.” Thus it comes to mean also, to sustain, support, assist, encourage, console” and also, “to lighten, qualify, alleviate, mitigate, lessen an evil, to assuage.”
This word is in the beautiful 10th century Mozarabic Lenten hymn Attende, Domine often sung in parishes around the world even today: “Give heed, O Lord, and be merciful, for we have sinned against you. / To you, O high King, Redeemer of all, / we raise up (sublevamur) our eyes weeping:/ hear, O Christ, the prayers of those bent down begging.”
Confessio is from confiteor (con-fateor – the first word in our expression of sorrow for sins at the beginning of Mass). This is a complicated word. First, confessio is obviously “a confession or acknowledgment”. The Latin Vulgate (Heb 3:1) and St. Gregory the Great (+604 – Ep. 7,5) use it for “a creed, avowal of belief” in the sense of an acknowledgment of Christ. The most famous use of confessio, however, must be that of St. Augustine of Hippo (+430), whose stupendous autobiographical prayer is now known as Confessiones. The excellent Augustinus Lexicon now being developed says confessio has three major meanings: profession of faith in God, praise of God, and admission to God of sins. We can say “testify” or “give witness to.” Augustine uses the word testimonium twice in the second sentence of his Confessions. This is not “confession” in the sense of admission of criminal guilt, nor is it merely to a Christian confession of sins. Rather, it is a way of giving witness to the Christian character we put on in baptism, a witness by how we live to what the Lord has done within us. Sometimes that response requires humble admission of sins, sometimes it requires humbly giving glory to God. Sometimes it demands patient fidelity and the practice virtue in the tedium of everyday life. Sometimes it requires more spectacular deeds, even martyrdom. It always demands humility. The best confession we make is in our words and deeds, according to our state in life, in the midst of the circumstances we face each day no matter what they are.
Our Collect reminds us of the remedies for sin identified by Jesus Himself: prayer, fasting (cf. Matthew 9:14), and almsgiving or works of mercy (cf. Matthew 6:1; Luke 12:33).
When Jesus cures the epileptic demoniac, He says that that sort of demon is driven out only by both prayer and fasting (Mark 9:27 Vulgate). In Acts 10 an angel tells the centurion Cornelius that his prayers and alms have been seen favorably by God (literally, they ascended as a memorial before God in the manner of a sacrifice).
St. Augustine said: “Do you wish your prayer to fly toward God? Make for it two wings: fasting and almsgiving” (En. ps. 42, 8).
In a Lenten Angelus address on 16 February 1997, St. John Paul II said:
The Church points out to us a path (of moving from a superficial life to deep interiority, from selfishness to love, of striving to live according to the model of Christ himself, that) … can be summarized in three words: prayer, fasting, almsgiving. Prayer can have many expressions, personal and communal. But we must above all live its essence, listening to God who speaks to us, conversing with us as children in a “face to face” dialogue filled with trust and love. In addition to being an external practice, fasting, which consists in the moderation of food and life-style, is a sincere effort to remove from our hearts all that is the result of sin and inclines us to evil. Almsgiving, far from being reduced to an occasional offering of money, means assuming an attitude of sharing and acceptance. We only need to “open our eyes” to see beside us so many brothers and sisters who are suffering materially and spiritually. Thus Lent is a forceful invitation to solidarity.
This brings us to conscientia. Conscientia signifies in the first place, “a knowing of a thing together with another person, joint knowledge, consciousness”. Note the unity, or solidarity, of knowledge in the prefix con-. It also means, “conscientiousness” in the sense of knowledge or feelings about a thing. It also has a moral meaning also as, “a consciousness of right or wrong, the moral sense”.
LITERAL TRANSLATION:
O God, author of all acts of mercy and all goodness,
who in fasts, prayers, and acts of almsgiving indicated the remedies of sins,
look propitiously on this testimony of our humility,
so that we who are being humbled in our conscience
may always be consoled by your mercy.
Remember, words have different meanings, which I why I provide raw vocabulary.
I must point out something that could change this literal translation.
St. Augustine in one of his sermons speaks of the mercy of God. Using the example of Jesus’ mercy to the woman caught in adultery (John 8), Augustine says – as if Jesus were talking – “Those others were restrained by conscience (conscientia) from punishing, mercy moves (inclinat misericordia) me to help you (ad subveniendum)” (s. 13.5 – 27 May 418 on the feast of St. Cyprian of Carthage). Even though in the Collect inclino is paired with conscientia rather than misericordia as it is in the sermon, the vocabulary suggests that this sermon may have been a partial source for this ancient Collect. This could provide a clue as to how to translate it. So, we can say “we who are being moved by our conscience” or even “we who are being brought low, bent down, humbled by our conscience” or “we who are flagging (as if under a weight) in our conscience”.
What to do? When translating we have to make a choice. This time around I chose “being humbled”.
As a people united before Christ’s altar of sacrifice, humbled and cast down low, we raise our eyes upwards to the Father who tenderly sees our efforts. But we can become weary in the midst of our Lenten discipline and the enemy is tirelessly working for our defeat.
Do not forget the military imagery of exercises and discipline we had in previous weeks.
In today’s Collect we beg Him to pick us back up, dust us off, and help us stay upright for the rest of the hard Lenten march (sublevemur).
In am reminded of the moment in the film The Passion of the Christ when Christ falls under His horrible burden of the Cross. His Mother, our Mother, recalling how once He had fallen as a child and she ran to Him to console Him in His unexpected pain, runs to Him to give Him what support she might in His entirely expected suffering. She ran to Him and then stood with Him.
Mary hurries also to each of us and stays by our side.
We are not in our Lenten discipline alone. When we are flagging in our efforts, when we are humbled in our failures, our Blessed Mother is our help, together with all the saints and angels of whom she is the glorious Queen.
We too can be help to others, particularly by not causing for them an occasion of temptation to break their resolve.
WARNING: I seem not to be able to watch this without choking up. I’ll bet you will too. If you are a “tough guy”, I’d shut the door.
4 Comments
Antonio Socci on the recent Corriere piece with and about Benedict XVI
Marco Tosatti has posted on his site an English translation of Antonio Socci’s latest, which was in Libero. It’s all about the recent Benedict XVI “interview” posted by Corriere della Sera.
Tosatti points out that Corriere turned non-news into the headline and buried the real lead. The non-news, old-news is Benedict XVI saying that “there is one Pope”. The real news is Benedict’s apparent attitude about Biden: it differs from that of Francis. That’s news.
What would have been news would have been a statement from Benedict that “There is only one Pope, and Francis is he, not I, and I have nothing to do with the papacy now.” But I believe Benedict has never said anything like that. That would have been news. Instead, Corriere emphasized what Benedict has been saying, with ambiguity, “there is only one Pope”.
Socci, in the English posted by Tosatti, points out what journalists could have asked and should get answers for:
-Why do you wear white and why are you called “Holy Father Benedict XVI” if there is only one pope?
-Why are you officially called “pope emeritus” if there is no juridical or theological definition of such a title?
-Why do you still give the Apostolic Blessing (or the Papal Blessing), which is a prerogative of the pope (to which a plenary indulgence is attached)?
After all, some people have noted that in some of his recent books are signed “Benedict PP XVI,” with the initials “PP” (Pastor Pastorum), which is the title reserved for the pope. Furthermore, in public ceremonies in which the pope emeritus has participated, some cardinals have bowed down to him and kissed his ring, which they should have done only with the pope.
Vatican journalist Saverio Gaeta has noted that “on Pope Bergoglio’s coat of arms the pallium is missing, while it is present on the coat of arms of Pope Ratzinger: an element that in Vatican symbology is decidedly not negligible.
Individually considered, meh. Taken together, hmm.
Socci then goes into the question of whether or not acceptance of the Petrine Ministry at the election is “irrevocable”. After all, in his last audience, Benedict said that it was “forever”, which suggests that Benedict thinks that the Petrine Ministry is like to the ontological change that comes with ordination. He goes into the curious speech given by Archbp. Gänswein in 2016 about Benedict’s intention to enlarge the Petrine Ministry, so there can be an active and a contemplative member (of the same Petrine office).
Theologians will have to hash through that last one, or we will have to wait for something new from the pen of …who?… I guess Benedict. He either had something in mind and reasons for it, or he didn’t. It would be helpful to have greater clarity so that we can know one way or the other.
The truth will out. And because of his concerns a constitutive element of the Church, the Petrine ministry, and the working of the Holy Spirit due to the many invocations at the time of a conclave, we should ask God the Holy Spirit to illuminate the questions.
It strikes me as unlikely that a Pope on his own can expand the Petrine Ministry, established by Christ. If this is a legitimate development, perceived by the Church over time and consistent with Tradition, the sensus fidelium fidei, etc., well…. maybe. But, if this is an error, it would be a substantial error. And if that substantial error was the basis of Benedict’s motive to resign the active Petrine Ministry without resigning the contemplative, then there would be grounds to raise a question or two about the validity of the resignation. In most cases, figures in the Church cannot resign validly if they are in substantial error about why they are resigning. Does that same standard apply to the Successor of Peter? I don’t know. The Pope is the Legislator and Interpreter, not I.
Just as a mind exercise, we might also remember that another idea has been floated about the resignation of Benedict, whereby he wanted to resign as Bishop of Rome (Successor of Peter), but not as Vicar of Christ (Successor of Peter). Similar to the active and contemplative scenario. Possible? Some say yes. Some say no. Would a Pope be in substantial error in such an attempt? Maybe. Given that Peter became Christ’s Vicar at Caesarea Philippi, not at Rome, and that Peter was Bishop at Antioch, before Rome, it seems that being Vicar of Christ was not, in its origin, dependent on being Bishop of Rome. Are the two offices now so tied together that the one is impossible without the other? Who says? This was debated at the time of Vatican I. Auctores scinduntur.
In any event, you might look at Socci’s piece, which is as much about the journlistic fumble as it was about the larger questions of the papacy.
27 Comments


























