EIGHT LIES today in one paragraph from Pres. Obama about Roe v Wade

First Things, which has revamped its site (check it out), has a good piece today about

EIGHT LIES IN PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ROE STATEMENT

by Matthew Schmitz

President Obama issued a statement today to mark the forty-first anniversary of Roe v. Wade. A mere paragraph long, it contains enough euphemism, evasion, and outright falsehood to serve simultaneously as a model of dissimulation and concision.

1. “We” — The statement begins by saying “as we reflect” on Roe “we recommit ourselves to the decision’s guiding principle.” But who is this we? Obama issues his statement in his official capacity as head of state, but America is sorely divided. By a generous measure, only 53 percent of Americans support Roe. When Obama pledges his rhetorical “we” to the principle of Roe, he elides one half of the nation he leads.

2. “Her body” — The President says that “every woman should be able to make her own choices about her body and her health.” This statement would certainly be true (given a few broad caveats) if he did not mean by it that one person should be able to dismantle the body and destroy the health of another.

3. “Safe, affordable health care” — For abortion to be safe, it would have to not be directed at the death of a child; for it to be affordable, it would have to not come at the cost of a life; for it to be health care, it would have to not violate the Hippocratic oath. This may be one lie or three—it’s hard to keep count.

4. “Right to privacy” — There can be no right to the taking of an innocent life. Nor can there be anything private about it for a society that believes securing rights to be a matter of the public good.

5. “Reproductive freedom” — There is no debate over the freedom of reproduction, only over the freedom of destruction.

6. “Unintended pregnancy” — What is meant here, of course, is an unintended child. But in any case, the idea that life is legitimate only when it is the product of our intentions—that everything should be perfectly “planned”—is at once impossible and perverse, a sociological error reflecting a theological mistake.

7. “Child health” — President Obama’s purported support for child health runs counter to his continuing, unrepented opposition to laws banning infanticide—an opposition that distinguishes him not only from abortion opponents but from most abortion supporters as well.

8. “This is a country where everyone deserves the same freedom and opportunities to fulfill their dreams.” — This is indeed such a country, as is every other. Why then, Mr. President, do you continue to stand in the way of the very weakest realizing the equal freedom you so blithely invoke?

Here’s the statement in full: [HERE]

Today, as we reflect on the 41st anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, we recommit ourselves to the decision’s guiding principle: that every woman should be able to make her own choices about her body and her health. We reaffirm our steadfast commitment to protecting a woman’s access to safe, affordable health care and her constitutional right to privacy, including the right to reproductive freedom. And we resolve to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, and continue to build safe and healthy communities for all our children. Because this is a country where everyone deserves the same freedom and opportunities to fulfill their dreams.

I am again reminded of the famous line in the fight between Hellman and McCarthy:

Every word [he] writes is a lie, including ‘and’ and ‘the’.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
19 Comments

VIDEO: Bp. Malone (D. Buffalo, NY) responds to extremist pro-abortion Gov. Cuomo

Setting an example.

In a moment of candor Gov. Andrew Cuomo pulled down his mask and revealed the Left’s true colors.  HERE  For Cuomo, if you are pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, pro-heterosexual marriage, you are an extremist.  If you are one of adulterous Cuomo’s extremists (and especially if you are a Republican – as if there are myriads of pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, pro-heterosexual marriage Democrats), there is no place for you in New York.

The Bishop of Buffalo, New York, Most Rev. Richard Malone, responded to the extremist, Gov. Cuomo

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Fr. Z kudos to Bp. Malone.

I responds saying:  Canon 915 for Gov. Cuomo.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Brick by Brick, Emanations from Penumbras, Fr. Z KUDOS, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
29 Comments

Why did Card. Rodriguez publicly criticize nay-saying German theology professors?

I have been thinking more about His Eminence Oscar Card. Rodriguez Maradiaga’s shot in the German newspaper at Archbp. Gerhard Müller of the CDF.  HERE

In his public criticism Card. Rodriguez said of Müller:

Er ist Deutscher – ja, ich muss das sagen, er ist obendrein Professor, ein deutscher Theologieprofessor. In seiner Mentalität gibt es nur richtig oder falsch, das war’s. Aber ich sage: “Die Welt, mein Bruder, die Welt ist nicht so. Du solltest ein wenig flexibel sein, wenn du andere Stimmen hörst, damit du nicht nur zuhörst und sagst, nein, hier ist die Wand.”

“He’s a German – yes, I have to say it – and above all he’s a professor, a German theology professor. In his mentality there is only true or false. But I say: The world, my brother, the world is not like that. You should be a little flexible, if you hear other voices, so as not to only hear them and say, no, here is the wall. ”

Rodriguez is, essentially saying in that last part, that German theology professors say “talk to the hand”.

However, I am more and more convinced that Card. Rodriguez’s remark about German theologians is a shot at Benedict XVI, along with Archbp. Müller.

Maybe even more at Benedict than at Müller.

Why would he do that?

This shot could be payback for the way that Benedict XVI’s administration punished Card. Rodriguez when he was president of Caritas Internationalis. In illo tempore, then Secretary of State Card. Bertone intervened in the selection/election of Card. Rodriguez’s Secretary. This was a move to rein in Caritas, if not quite a hostile take-over.

Caritas, under Card. Rodriguez – whom I am convinced contributed heavily to certain paragraphs on economics in Evangelii gaudium – and that secretary seems to have developed too much of an NGO mentality. It was also flirting with pro-abortion organizations and contraception.  HERE Even America Magazine saw this.  HERE  Remember this controversy?  In part:

On 15 February the Cardinal Secretary of State, Tarcisio Bertone, wrote to the bishops’ conferences of the world to explain why the Vatican was not going to renew Dr Knight’s mandate following the CI’s general assembly in May. In the three-page letter, reported by The Tablet last weekend, Cardinal Bertone said Caritas needed a stronger Catholic identity. The next four years, he explained, would need to focus on “harmonizing the theological dimension of Caritas Internationalis … with its role as an organization operating on the international stage”. This would require, he said, greater cooperation with other ecclesial bodies and with Vatican dicasteries that have an “interest” in CI activities. Caritas’s advocacy work, he explained, needs to be better coordinated “in strict cooperation with the Holy See, which is specifically competent in this regard.”

 […]

Caritas members are appalled. CI’s president, Honduran cardinal Oscar Andrés Rodríguez de Maradiaga, has made clear his “incomprehension” at the decision. …

[…]

Didn’t Pope Francis, on the 2nd day of his pontificate, remind us that the Church isn’t supposed to be just a “compassionate NGO”?  He also said something about this in June.

Comment moderation is switched on.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
49 Comments

March for Life Solidarity – Your News?

I am in solidarity today with everyone who is participating in the March for Life, in Washington DC and elsewhere.

My first experience of the March for Life in Washington was last year. A great experience and a cold experience, just as this year is.

Say a prayer for everyone taking it to the streets, first, that their efforts along wtih graces produce changes of hearts and mind and, next, that their holy angels protect them from spiritual and temporal harm.

Some images from last year. HERE

What are you up to where you are? Post your events and what you are doing here.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Events, Linking Back | Tagged , ,
24 Comments

“Today, we fix our gaze on Agnes.”

There is a lovely post at Vultus Christi to which I direct your attention.

This is how it begins:

The wintertime liturgy sparkles with a constellation of virgin martyrs and holy women. The Roman Canon enshrines their names: Felicity, Perpetua, Agatha, Lucy, Agnes, Cecilia and Anastasia. In the darkest months of the year, they shine like so many little flames taken from the Paschal Candle in the great and holy night of the Resurrection. Today, we fix our gaze on Agnes.

If I Love Him

The Office of Saint Agnes is one of the most beautiful in the Roman Liturgy. It expresses all the sentiments of the little virgin martyr’s pure and passionate heart. “Christ is my Lover,” she sings in the Third Responsory at Matins, “and I am entering with Him into the marriage-chamber. . . . The instruments of His music sound sweetly in my ears. If I love Him I shall be chaste; if I touch Him I shall be clean; if I embrace Him I shall be a virgin indeed.”

[…]

See the rest there.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged ,
3 Comments

Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. Card. Rodriguez v. soon-to-be Card. Müller

His Eminence Rodriguez Card. Maradiaga gave an interview to at least one German newspaper. It was reported by Reuters that he spoke to a newspaper of Cologne, Germany, Köln, the Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger.  I found an interview, if there is only one, at the site of the Frankfurter Rundschau.

[UPDATE 21 Jan 1643 GMT – the Frankfurter Rundschau has removed that article from their site! You get a 404 page.  For the whole thing at Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger go HERE]

The Cardinal openly criticized soon-to-be Cardinal Müller.

Okay, maybe Müller brought a little of this on himself by defending Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst, who spent a lot of money to revamp the bishop’s residence.  Fine.  He’s a big boy and he can handle that heat.

But … Rodriguez suggests that Müller’s problem is that he is a professorial theologian who doesn’t grasp the real world:

Ihr Mitbruder, Kardinal in spe Gerhard Ludwig Müller, hält als Präfekt der Glaubenskongregation offenbar mehr von der Autorität der Kirche.

MARADIAGA: (lacht) Ich habe es gelesen, ja. Und ich dachte: “Okay, vielleicht hast Du Recht, vielleicht aber auch nicht.” Ich meine, ich verstehe ihn: Er ist Deutscher – ja, ich muss das sagen, er ist obendrein Professor, ein deutscher Theologieprofessor. In seiner Mentalität gibt es nur richtig oder falsch, das war’s. Aber ich sage: “Die Welt, mein Bruder, die Welt ist nicht so. Du solltest ein wenig flexibel sein, wenn du andere Stimmen hörst, damit du nicht nur zuhörst und sagst, nein, hier ist die Wand.” Also, ich glaube, er wird dahin gelangen, andere Ansichten zu verstehen. Aber jetzt ist er halt noch am Anfang, hört bloß auf seinen Beraterstab.

“…ein deutscher Theologieprofessor…”?

Who else was a German Theology professor?

Unless Rodriguez thinks he is Vice-Pope, he should not speak like this to the press about the Prefect of the CDF.  As a matter of fact, Cardinals probably should not speak to the press at all.  Come to think of it, neither should Popes, much less Vice-Popes.  Emeritus?… I digress.

Rodriguez does NOT speak for Francis.  Nothing suggests that he does.

In any event, maybe Rodriguez just had a bad moment with the interviewer.  Maybe he went too far.  It happens.  After all, he has a history is speaking in somewhat exaggerated terms, and right now – with all the worldly attention he is getting in Pope Francis’ shadow – he could be feeling his oats.

I am leaning toward His Eminence having had a bad day.  You might remember that he made that infamous statement that Jews who run the media in the USA blew the clerical sexual abuse thing out of proportion.  Remember the reaction from the ADL?  The ADL was outraged by Card. Rodriguez’s statements in 30 Giorni that Jewish influence in the media trumped up the clerical sexual abuse controversy to distract from Israeli-Palestinian problems.  Not a good day.

It is interesting, however, how courageously the Cardinal attacked the German soon-to-be Cardinal Müller, Prefect of nothing less than the CDF, in a German newspaper of Cologne, Köln.

What better way to capture press notice?

“But Father! But Father!”, you are tempted to whisper, “Francis is against… I can barely bring myself to say the hated word… careerism….”

Right.

So, what’s the play here, if there is one?

If I were to put on my analyst’s cap….

First, as I said before, it could be that Card. Rodriguez had a bad day.  That happens.  We have bad days.

Is there some ecclesiastical game here?

Let’s think about this.

If, as some are saying, Pope Francis wanted to get rid of Müller from the Curia – and there isn’t much evidence of that, since Francis is signing off on what he’s doing – then Francis would have to move him to someplace like Cologne, Germany!

Keep thinking.  In Cologne, the chapter of the Cathedral have a lot of say about who gets the archbishopric there. Unless… unless… he is a Cardinal. The Pope can’t just move any ol’ bishop there, against the will of the chapter, but he can move a Cardinal. What do you know?   Francis is making Müller a Cardinal in February, which makes him movable … out of the Curia and to Germany? Promoveatur ut amoveatur?

So, would Francis make Müller a Cardinal to move him to Cologne? No way.  Francis doesn’t like professiorial types as bishops of dioceses. He wants “pastoral” types. Müller is said to have failed that test in Regensburg.  Germany would go up in flames.

So… would Rodriguez dump on Müller in order to “help” him move from the Curia to Cologne? Doesn’t seem logical.  Pretty cynical, since that goes against everything Francis says he is about. If Rodriguez were against Müller being in the CDF, then why run Müller down in Cologne, the logical place for him to go?   That doesn’t make sense…

… unless Card. Rodriguez was having a bad day.

Or unless he simply want to undercut Müller and … undermine the Congregation and Müller’s arguments about the divorced and remarried?

Okay… I am just rattling on here.  Pay no attention to me.

In any event, what Card. Rodriguez did was display dirty laundry publicly.  When you are a Cardinal, you don’t do this.  Okay, Card. Marx did this to Müller too.  Let that pass.  I say: When you are a Cardinal, you don’t do this.

I will add that if Card. Rodriguez doesn’t like Müller’s reasoning about Communion for the divorced and remarried, then deal with the arguments instead of carrying on an ad hominem attack in a German newspaper.

QUAERITUR: Does Card. Rodriguez have more than, “that’s not how the world works”?  I suspect not.  Müller, on the other hand, had cogent arguments in L’Osservatore Romano.

Go back and read these:

Do you remember what I predicted? I wrote about Müller’s essay on the Communion and the divorced and remarried?

This is going to be spun by the left as the Bad Guy’s attempt to stop Francis.

Müller won’t be presented as the voice of reason. No, he will be the Bad Guy.

Fishwrap will say something nasty about him, something personal, like, “Now that Müller is secure in his appointment as Prefect, he feels free to attack ‘mercy’.”

Card. Rodriguez talking about the way the real world works is, effectively, the same thing: Müller doesn’t understand the “real world”… that is to say… Müller doesn’t understand mercy.

Keep your eyes on the upcoming Synod of Bishops. Watch who makes pleas that we abandon the Church’s teaching and discipline and simply wave a wand over the divorced and remarried … and say we should just ordain married men as priests, for that matter.

As I think about this through, we are seeing preparatory work for the the Synod.

In the meantime… whose is actually running the Diocese of Tegucigalpa?

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , ,
43 Comments

Of St. Sebastian, Dufay, St. Ambrose, and Debussy

Today in the traditional Roman calendar is the Feast of Sts. Fabian and Sebastian, martyrs.

St. Pope Fabian was slain in 250 during the persecutions of Decius.

St. Sebastian, famous in sacred art for his arrow ridden body, was a Roman soldier murdered later in the 3rd century during the persecutions of Diocletian.  St. Ambrose tells us about Sebastian in a sermon.

For your edification, there are a couple pieces of music I know which involve St. Sebastian, of contrasting styles and eras.

Guillaume Defuy (+1474) gives us a little motet, O Sancte Sebastiane. There is also Le Martye de saint Sébastien, controversial in its day for the avante-guarde performance choices.

You might like to hear them side by side, as it were…. well… forming a kind of Ambrosian sandwich.  I’ll read a little Ambrose for you, from his Exposition of Ps. 118, in English first and then some Latin, to get our language into your ear.

Orémus

Infirmitatem nostram respice, omnipotens Deus: et quia pondus propriae actionis gravat, beatorum Martyrum tuorum Fabiani et Sebastiani intercessio gloriosa nos protegat.

Posted in Patristiblogging, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , , ,
10 Comments

VIDEO: Benedict XVI and Msgr. Ratzinger

Here is a video which has some recent views and sound of Benedict XVI in his residence in the Vatican Gardens.  Most of the video is dedicated to an interview with His Holiness’ brother Msgr. George Ratzinger, the retired Kapellmeister of the Cathedral in Regensburg.

It is entirely in German with no subtitles.  The best views of Benedict are at the beginning and the end.

The full video is HERE.  Here is short excerpt.  I severely lowered the quality of the video, so as to make it small enough to load quickly.

Play
Posted in Benedict XVI | Tagged ,
25 Comments

Gov. Andrew Cuomo: conservatives “have no place in the state of New York”

Did you hear the latest about the adulterous governor of New York?

I picked on on this from some commentary pieces at NRO HERE and HERE (Kathryn Jean Lopez is all over this) and traced it back to something at Capitol Confidential:

Cuomo: ‘Extreme conservatives … have no place in the state of New York

Gov. Andrew Cuomo says the current “schism” in the state Republican party is a smaller version of the split causing so much damage in Washington, D.C., and that “conservative Republicans … have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are.

In conversation with Susan Arbetter on “The Capitol Pressroom” Friday morning, Cuomo said:

You have a schism within the Republican Party. … They’re searching to define their soul, that’s what’s going on. Is the Republican party in this state a moderate party or is it an extreme conservative party? That’s what they’re trying to figure out. It’s a mirror of what’s going on in Washington. The gridlock in Washington is less about Democrats and Republicans. It’s more about extreme Republicans versus moderate Republicans.

… You’re seeing that play out in New York. … The Republican Party candidates are running against the SAFE Act — it was voted for by moderate Republicans who run the Senate! Their problem is not me and the Democrats; their problem is themselves. Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, [!] pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are.  [Will he have people rounded up and deported?  Perhaps he’ll inter them in camps with the help of the National Guard.]

[…]

The governor’s suggestion that, for example, those who hold anti-abortion views have no place in the state prompted Dennis Poust, spokesman for the state Catholic Conference, to observe on Twitter, “My governor thinks there’s no place in NY for people like me. Can I get a state grant to relocate?” (And where to — New Hampshire, maybe?)

Cuomo also defended his immense campaign haul of more than $33 million.

[…]

It sounds as if pro-abortion adulterer Cuomo is ready to found a new version of the Know Nothing Party, doesn’t it.

In the meantime, while Cuomo talks up this bigoted Party Of Death horse hockey, he and his ilk have also made it extremely difficult for the citizens of New York to defend themselves from the encroaching State and the new menacing governor according to the Founders intentions in the Second Amendment.

Whom does this governor’s rhetoric remind me of?

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , ,
85 Comments

ACTION ITEM! An idea for the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity!

Today we begin the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.

Admit it.  You forgot this, right?

I must confess that, in the past, I have been a little… what to say… lukewarm?… about this Week for Christian Unity.  But we really need to get behind it, no?

Let’s work together with out Protestant sisters and brothers in a common cause!

Let us be one!

In this light, I note with interest an article at Newsmax.

Oregon: Cake Refusal Violates Gay Couple’s Rights

A bakery in suburban Portland, Ore., violated the civil rights of a same-sex couple by refusing to bake a cake for the women’s wedding, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries said Friday.

Investigators found substantial evidence that Sweet Cakes by Melissa unlawfully discriminated against the couple based on their sexual orientation, agency spokesman Charlie Burr said.

[…]

Rachel Cryer and Laurel Bowman of Portland say they were denied a wedding cake last January by the bakery’s owners, Aaron and Melissa Klein. The women filed a complaint with the state.

[…]

Klein responded that he and his wife didn’t serve same-sex weddings and “cited a religious belief for (the) refusal to make cakes for same-sex couples planning to marry,” the complaint said.  [Religious belief… get that?]

Herbert Grey, the Kleins’ lawyer, said his clients will participate in the conciliation process but maintain their original stance. The Kleins have said they weren’t discriminating against the couple, who were customers in the past. Instead, they said they were practicing their constitutional right to religious freedom. They have said baking a cake for a same-sex wedding would violate their Christian beliefs.

[…]

Who knew that bakeries would be the battle ground for our religious freedom?

Let us unite across confessional lines!

These bakers are Christians, right?  They are separated brethren, right?

What better week to show our resolve and zeal for our Week of Christian Unity than for the bishops of these USA to line up behind the bakery in support of and defense of their religious freedom?

We welcome the support of Protestants in our own struggle for religious freedom, don’t we?

This is a time for robust ecumenism!

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty | Tagged , , ,
54 Comments