Mark Steyn on his editors at NRO and Phil Robertson

I appreciate both how Mark Steyn writes and what he has written about the Duck Dynasty controversy and Phil Robertson’s persecution.

Remember: I am a free market guy.  If A&E wants to bend over for bullies, fine.  They can do that.  But the rest of us should then stop giving them any business.

Back to Steyn.  He is taking a different tack than the editors at NRO, who seem inclined to go with the winds on this on. This is from a few days back, but I am just getting around to it.

Thus, Steyn:

Re-Education Camp
By Mark Steyn

Having leaned on A&E to suspend their biggest star, GLAAD has now moved on to Stage Two:

“We believe the next step is to use this as an opportunity for Phil to sit down with gay families in Louisiana and learn about their lives and the values they share,” the spokesman said. [THAT’s gonna happen.  Just envision such a meeting.]

Actually, “the next step” is for you thugs to push off and stop targeting, threatening and making demands of those who happen to disagree with you. Personally, I think this would be a wonderful opportunity for the GLAAD executive board to sit down with half-a-dozen firebreathing imams and learn about their values, […]

[…]

I am sorry my editor at NR does not grasp the stakes. Indeed, he seems inclined to “normalize” what GLAAD is doing. But, if he truly finds my “derogatory language” offensive, I’d rather he just indefinitely suspend me than twist himself into a soggy pretzel of ambivalent inertia trying to avoid the central point — that a society where lives are ruined over an aside because some identity-group don decides it must be so is ugly and profoundly illiberal. […]

Read the rest over there.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Pò sì jiù, Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
27 Comments

PODCAzT 138: Christmas Poetry Experiment

Today I decided to experiment by recording voice memos with my phone, then sending them to my computer at home, then accessing that computer remotely with the same phone to assemble a podcast.

Let’s see how it turned out!

Please forgive bumps and scratches along the way.   I just wanted to see if I could pull it off in a way that was not too time and energy consuming.

Most of the music was by the wonderful choir at St. John Cantius in Chicago!

Posted in PODCAzT |
9 Comments

US ARMY “equal opportunity officer”: You can’t say “Christmas”

From Human Events:

[…]

Maybe it was about time to get the Army involved in the War On Christmas – a long march through every corner of American life by the anti-religious, collectivist Left, designed to scour this prime patch of emotional and intellectual real estate clean of all religious significance.  You’ll lose this holiday, Christians, even if they have to pry it from your trembling fingers.  [μολὼν λαβέ] The big year-end holiday season is too valuable to be left in your hands.

Todd Starnes at Fox News relates a bizarre outburst from an “equal opportunity officer” at a meeting of the 158th Infantry Brigade in Mississippi, at which the annual Christmas football tournament was discussed:

“Our equal opportunity representative stopped the briefing and told us that we can’t say Christmas,” the soldier told me. “Almost the entire room blew up. Everybody was frustrated. The equal opportunity rep told our commander that not everyone celebrates Christmas and we couldn’t say Christmas celebration. It had to be holiday celebration.”

The soldier said there was a brief, but heated discussion about political correctness. At one point, the equal opportunity representative tried to deflect the criticism by pointing out it was the Army’s rules – not hers.

“She said an individual can say Christmas, but as an organization in the Army you can’t say Christmas,” the soldier told me.

The Army said there was no such policy… right before they said well, yeah, there kinda is.

“There is no policy at the 158th Infantry Brigade, First Army Division East or First Army that forbids using the word ‘Christmas’,” Public Affairs Chief Amanda Glenn told me.

She confirmed that there was a discussion in the meeting about the football tournament. She said it was meant to be a team building event and it had no tie to a specific religious event or holiday celebration.

“The Equal Opportunity advisor simply stated that it would be more appropriate to call it a holiday football event,” she said.

[…]

You can’t make this rubbish up.

Read the rest there.

Ah, the fruits of the administration of The First Gay President!

Merry Christmas!

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , ,
26 Comments

Twitter blocks support of Phil. Cracker Barrel removes Duck stuff. Ooops! (Mistake!)

Censorship is bad, right? It’s bad unless it is used on people who uphold heterosexuality.

Here’s a story about what Twitter did.

‘Duck Dynasty’: Twitter Blocks ‘iStandWithPhil.com‘ Content

UPDATED: Twitter has restored access to the link, stating that the website had mistakenly been flagged as spam.

In the latest development in the ongoing culture war surrounding Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson’s controversial remarks on homosexuality, the pro-Robertson website iStandwithPhil.com was flagged on Twitter, prohibiting users from posting messages containing links to the page. Twitter removed the block late on Dec. 23, and a Twitter spokesperson explained that an outside organization that tracks spam sources had mistakenly flagged the URL as spam.

“We have restored access and apologize for the error,” the spokesperson said.

[…]

It was a “mistake”. Yah, right.

In other news, did you hear about Cracker Barrel restaurants?   Their clientele is not exactly the tony NYC liberal type.  They took all the Duck stuff off their shelves.  Big mistake.

Posted in Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments

Card. Meisner cites Pope Francis: No Communion for divorced, remarried

A reader sent the following.  Cardinal Meisner of Cologne gave an interview to Deutschlandrundfunk.

You might be interested in this interview with Cardinal Meisner:

In his third answer, he says the following (it’s my translation in English, probably very bad):

“At my last meeting with Pope Francis, I had the opportunity to talk very open to him about a lot of things. And I told him that some questions remain unanswered in his style of spreading the gospel through interviews and short speeches, questions which need some extended explanation for people who are not so involved. The pope looked at me “with big eyes” and asked me to give an example. And my response was : During the flight back from Rio you were asked about people who divorced and remarried. And the pope responded frankly: People who are divorced can receive communion, people who are remarried can’t. In the orthodox church you can marry twice. And then he talked about mercy, which, according to my view, is seen in this country only as a surrogate for all human faults. And the pope responded quite bluntly that he’s a son of the church, and he doesn’t proclaim anything else than the teachings of the church. And mercy has to be identical with truth – if not, she doesn’t deserve that name. Furthermore, when there are open theological questions, it’s up to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to give detailed responses“.

From this we can perhaps glean that Pope Francis may not be entirely aware of the havoc (¿lío?) that some of his home-spun, off-the-cuff comments in the mainstream media have caused.

It would be interesting to see His Holiness’ reaction to the story about the Catholic school kids in Seattle protesting in favor of some homosexual thing while citing the phrase “Who am I to judge.”  The same for catholic politicians in Illinois citing the same when they passed same-sex marriage.

However, Pope Francis confirmed what I have been saying all along.  He is not going to “change” the Church’s teachings (as if he could).  Divorced and remarried?  No Communion.

Furthermore, Francis stressed the role of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.  He doesn’t sound like someone who wants to “devolve” the role of the Congregation to regional conferences.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
46 Comments

WARNING! Tradition: A Danger To Your Children?

This is pretty funny. I saw this at Badger Catholic (nice guys):

Laugh over this and other amusing scenarios over some Mystic Monk Coffee in your very own Prometheus-sized mug.

Click me!

For those of you who don’t have one of these… you can either click below and get one or just eat your liver out.

Posted in Lighter fare, Our Catholic Identity, Self-absorbed Promethean Neopelagians, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

QUAERITUR: Bp. Jenky (D. Peoria) requests… Rogation Days?

From a reader:

Bishop Jenky (Diocese of Peoria) has just announced that he is petitioning the Congregation for Divine Worship to allow for Rogation Days to be added to the liturgical calendar for the Church of Peoria.  (Letter of announcement available on his Facebook: link.)  Could you please explain what Rogation Days are, and why they have disappeared?

Rogation Days were on the traditional Roman calendar for 25 April (Major Rogation Day) and the three days before Ascension THURSDAY (Minor).

“Rogation” comes from rogo “to ask”.

For the Major days, the Greater Litanies were recited and there could be a procession and prayers for blessings on crops. Remember, people didn’t divorce prayer from the things which were critical for survival.

The Minor days included the Lesser Litanies. Again, there are prayers and blessings for crops, given that it is spring (at least in the northern part of the globe). There would be the ceremony of the “beating of the bounds”. The procession would go around the boundaries of the property, singing litanies and prayers.

The traditional Roman calendar more thoroughly integrates the mysteries of the Lord’s life and turning of the Earth into the passing days of our lives.

Reason #746 for Summorum Pontificum, if you ask me.

Why did Rogation Days disappear?

Like many other aspects of sacred time Rogation Days were dropped from the Roman calendar and, thereafter, fell into oblivion.  Ember Days and Pre-Lent Sundays were brutally excised from our lives and they ought to be reclaimed.  Another reason why Rogation Days fell away may be because we are now less rural and agrarian than ever before in human history.  Also, perhaps such days tend to favor a Northern Hemisphere mentality.  Dunno.

Across the board, we are less in touch with the sacred time.  The electrification of our lives and ability to live in comfort without having chopped wood and gathered food all summer has pulled from our consciences a fundamental connection with God’s amazing cosmic set up.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
14 Comments

A few thoughts about changes to the Congregation for Bishops. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

A lot of you are asking by email my take on Pope Francis’ not confirming Card. Burke as a member of the Congregations for Bishops and for Saints.

The fact is that the members of these Congregations are routinely shifted around.  Do I like the fact that Card. Burke and some others are no longer members?  Not much, no.  However, I don’t think it is wise to have a spittle-flecked nutty about it.

Some people are turning this into some sort of papal pogrom against conservative cardinals. I can’t rule that out.  We could also look at it more benignly.  After all, His Eminence Card. Burke is still young for a cardinal.  He is still the Prefect of the Segnatura.  He is still able to get on airplanes, etc.  Having fewer meetings to go to also gives him more time to write and more flexibility to give conferences.

What could the changes in the membership of the Congregation for Bishops mean?  Again, I am not pleased at the loss of Card. Burke’s or Card. Bagnasco’s voices therein.  It has been suggested that the Pope wants the nominations of more progressive bishops. That may be the case.  However, under Francis, “progressive” shan’t mean what it did back in the day. That is to say, today “progressive” may mean something like doctrinally orthodox but little inclined to be strong and vocal in matters of doctrine or discipline. It may be that the identikit of the bishop is shifting in this pontificate.  It might mean “nice guy” rather than … you know.  It could be that the men who are lassoed into the ranks of the episcopate will tend not to be bold “culture warriors” in the service of clear, traditional Catholic doctrine and discipline.  I think we need bold “culture warriors”, but I wasn’t consulted.   Furthermore, they will more than likely be pretty nearly squeaky clean, if you get me drift.

Keep in mind that it takes a while to shift the identikit of the episcopacy.  It can’t happen overnight.  Men being made bishops now were probably already being studied during the reign of Benedict XVI.  It takes time to collect possible candidates, create the dossiers, gather reports, mull them over, etc.  It took John Paul II the better part of two decades to shift the episcopate around.

What we will not see, however, is a return to the age of the appointments of 70’s and 80’s types, that is, “culture warriors” pushing a liberal, secularizing, anti-traditional modernist agenda!  Keep your eyes on who holds the office of Apostolic Nuncio in your country.  They are probably more important in the process of selection of bishops than the members of the Congregation.  I seriously doubt we will see the return of the likes of Archbishop Jadot.  Quod Deus averruncet.

By the way, when you hear or read liberals whine about how men like Card. Burke or this or that sound bishop are “culture warriors” and that “culture warriors” are bad, deluded, harmful, blah blah blah, remember that those liberals are themselves “culture warriors”.  They are being hypocritical when they slam conservatives as “culture warriors”.  They are “culture warriors” for the opposition (which can sometimes include the Enemy).  Their lamentation about conservative “culture warrior” bishops is a silencing tactic.  They seek to bully brave bishops into silence so that they and they alone have free rein to war for their causes.  Watch their slight of hand!   They set up a model that they call “pastoral” and they pit “pastoral” against “traditional” or “conservative”.   In their bearded-Spock universe, you can’t be both “pastoral” and “traditional”.  If you are conservative, you don’t care about the sheep, etc.  Only they really truly caaaare. Remember this when you see liberals complain about some bishop not being “civil” or that we need more “civility”.  But I digress.

What else could the change in the membership in the Congregation for Bishops mean?  As you know, Card. Wuerl was appointed to the Congregation.  More than one person has suggested that the Pope is clearing the way for Card. Wuerl to be transferred from Washington DC to Rome to be in the Roman Curia.  I don’t see that happening, but… hey!… who knows what is going to happen?   Furthermore, more than one person has suggested to me that moving Wuerl to Rome and lightening Burke’s brief could signal an intention to move Burke back to the USA as Archbishop of Washington or Chicago.  Again, I have a hard time imagining that, given His Eminence’s clear, repeated stand on canon 915.  Were Pope Francis to make Card. Burke Archbishop of Washington DC, with all those pro-abortion catholic politicians in residence in his domain…. imagine the wailing and gnashing.  We can dream.  On the other hand, I really like and respect Card. Burke.  I wouldn’t wish such a mandate on him.

So, let’s not panic about these changes of the memberships of congregations. Who knows? It could be that Card. Burke will be appointed as a member to other Congregations, such as the critically important Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Card. Burke is only 65. He can’t just be left doing nothing. It is unlikely that His Holiness will just shuffle His Eminence into oblivion.  At the end of the day, Card. Burke is a CARDINAL and a young one at that.

It is hard to guess what our Pope is going to do next! It sure is an interesting ride.

Finally, I repeat here what I have written elsewhere.

The vision provided us by Benedict XVI is still as valid and necessary today as it ever was.   Keep pushing forward with a revitalization of our sacred liturgical worship no matter what.  Do not flag.  Do not be discouraged.  Do not relent.  Get organized.  Recruit.  Persuade.  Provide.  Demonstrate your joy in the use of the older, traditional forms as you call for even wider application of the provisions of Summorum Pontificum, which is universal law.  Excel in the performance of corporal and spiritual works of mercy even as you call for use of the traditional forms.

No efforts of New Evangelization or any other positive undertaking in the Church (ad intra or ad extra) will succeed without a revitalization of our sacred liturgical worship.

The combox moderation queue is switched on.

And former-Father Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Be The Maquis, Benedict XVI, Francis, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
28 Comments

Does Phil Robertson sound like Pope Francis? Vice versa?

At HuffPo there is an amusing piece about the recent Duck controversy.

Phil Robertson vs. Pope Francis On Gays

As some Christians step up to defend Phil Robertson’s stance on homosexuality, one person went even farther, comparing the “Duck Dynasty” patriarch’s comments to those of Pope Francis.

Newt Gingrich said on Crossfire, “Ironically, if you read the whole interview, not just take one section, he talks very specifically about loving everybody. He talks very specifically about not being judgmental toward anybody, that’s God’s decision, not his. I mean, it is remarkable. There’s sections there where he sounds like Pope Francis.”

[… then a silly person intervenes…]

For comparison, here are some of Pope Francis’ remarks about gay people and Robertson’s quotes.

Posted in Francis | Tagged , , ,
112 Comments

Pope Francis and Christmas Greetings to the Roman Curia

The Holy Father exchange the traditional Christmas greetings with the Roman Curia today.

The Pontiff opted not to reflect on the year past, but instead gave a brief address which included some words of thanks to those who are retiring (not a few) and some of his patented homespun advice.

Suggesting that the people who work in the Curia should be holy, a good option I might add, he said:

Holiness in the Curia also means conscientious objection to gossip! We rightfully insist on the importance of conscientious objection but perhaps we, too, need to exercise it as a means of defending ourselves from an unwritten law of our surroundings, which unfortunately is that of gossip. So let us all be conscientious objectors; and mind you, I am not simply preaching! Gossip is harmful to people, our work and our surroundings.

 

Posted in Francis, The Drill | Tagged ,
20 Comments