Pro-life blogger Jill Stanek has an entry about the influence of the US Catholic bishops on the passing of the Stupak/Pitts Amendment.
You might recall that Jill Stanek was a nurse from Illinois who exposed how at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, IL abortions being committed and babies were being aborted alive to die without medical care.
Here is her entry with my emphases and comments.
November 12, 2009
Bishops in the House
Here was a verrry interesting Associated Press story yesterday on just how involved the US Conference of Catholic Bishops – God bless ’em – were in getting the Stupak/Pitts Amendment into the healthcare bill. Pretty wild…
The call came in from Rome, just as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her top lieutenants were scrambling to round up scarce votes to pass their sweeping health overhaul.
Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the former archbishop of Washington, was on the line for Pelosi, calling to discuss adding strict abortion restrictions to the House bill.
It was just 1 element of an intensive lobbying effort orchestrated by the nation’s Catholic bishops, who have emerged as a formidable force in the health care negotiations. They used their clout with millions of Catholics and worked behind the scenes in Congress to make sure the abortion curbs were included in the legislation – and are now pressing to keep them there…. [And make no mistake…. by using their clout they gained more clout!]
They don’t spend a dime on what is legally defined as lobbying, but lawmakers and insiders recognize that the bishops’ voices matter – and they move votes. [And as people hear how the bishops influenced the debate, they will pay more and more attention to them. But…. but… the bishops had better have something good to say or they will squander the moral capital they have begun to win back.] Representatives for the bishops were in Pelosi’s Capitol suite negotiating with top officials for 3 hours last Friday evening [! Get that?] as they reached final terms of the agreement. That was just hours after Pelosi, a Catholic abortion rights supporter, took the call from McCarrick.
Boston’s Cardinal Sean O’Malley personally appealed to President Barack Obama about the issue near the church altar at the early September funeral for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-MA. Bishops quietly called their congressmen and senators to weigh in. [Yah… I bet that made a big difference.]
"The Catholic Church used their power – their clout, if you will – to influence this issue. They had to. It’s a basic teaching of the religion," said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-MI, a leading abortion foe and architect of the health measure’s restrictions.
[Read carefully…] It was Stupak who told Pelosi last Friday that if she wanted a deal on the health bill, she’d be well advised to invite the bishops’ staff, who were already in his office, to her table. "I said, ‘Well, they’re here, and they’re one of the key groups you want to have on your side, so why don’t we just bring them in and work this out," Stupak said. [Yah! Why not? And maybe they could discuss things like… say… Holy Communion for politicians who push legislation they know would spend tax payer funds on elective abortions!]
Pelosi did, and the result was a final measure that – much to the outrage of abortion rights supporters – bars a new government-run insurance plan from covering abortions, except in cases or rape, incest or the life of the mother being in danger, and prohibits any health plan that receives federal subsidies in a new insurance marketplace from offering abortion coverage. If women wanted to purchase abortion coverage through such plans, they’d have to buy it separately, as a so-called rider on their insurance policies.
The outcome has put Obama and Democratic leaders – already struggling for consensus on the complex and politically tricky health measure – in a tough spot. [But! … That was not why the bishops got involved. If that was a consequence, the bishops did not do this as a political maneuver aimed at the present administration. Their concern was moral and not political.] Democratic abortion foes in the Senate vow they won’t support health legislation that omits the strict restrictions approved by the House, while abortion rights champions say they can’t possibly vote for a bill that contains them.
Obama suggested Monday that he wants to strike a balance [Uh huh… suuuure he does.] that doesn’t allow backdoor federal funding of abortions but preserves women’s insurance choices. For now, however, no such middle ground has been identified, and the bishops have served their notice that they will be a player – perhaps the dominant one – in the final outcome. [I mentioned the other day in an interview with a newspaper that perhaps the Obama administration had awakened something they perhaps would rather not have aroused.]
The US Conference of Catholic Bishops, the church’s Washington-based advocacy organization, which is staffed by more than 350 lay people, [good heavens] derives its power in large part from the sheer number of Catholics in this country – 68 million – but also from the special moral and religious standing of its members. Many of them are in regular contact with lawmakers, weighing in on issues from immigration policy to benefits for low-income people.
The conference distributed fliers to every parish in the nation asking people to pray for abortion restrictions and to call their congressmen and senators asking them to "fix these bills with pro-life amendments."
Some have publicly pressured Catholic elected officials to fall in line with the church’s position on abortion. Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence and Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-RI, abruptly canceled a meeting they had planned for Thursday to calm a simmering feud over the issue. Kennedy has criticized the church for threatening to block the health measure over abortion curbs, and Tobin has questioned whether Kennedy can call himself a Catholic given that he has opposed the strict abortion limits bishops were seeking to add.
Kathy Saile of the conference said Democratic leaders were willing to listen to the group because it has been in favor of the party’s broader push for a health overhaul.
"We stayed in the conversation until the end, because the bishops have always been adamant about the need for genuine health care reform and want to see health care reform happen," Saile said.
Another factor that undoubtedly helped: Democrats are keenly aware of the power of Catholic voters, more than 50%t of whom embraced Obama in the 2008 election. That was a substantial swing after Catholics had eschewed the 2004 Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. John Kerry of MA, who is Catholic.
[And now read the panicky little nutty thrown by this pro-death liberal. It’s the same ol’ same ol’.] The outcome left abortion-rights supporters, who couldn’t muster enough votes in the House to head off Catholic abortion foes’ intervention, fuming. The bishops "essentially got signoff. They dictated this, and it’s totally inappropriate – it’s blatant interference between church and state," said Eleanor Smeal of the Feminist Majority. "The women’s movement and the pro-choice forces feel like they were had." [Would she care to back up that ridiculous statement? Where does it say that a church cannot voice its position in the public square? Does her copy of the Bill of Rights not include that pesky 1st? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."]
Rep. Diana DeGette, D-CO, a prominent abortion rights supporter who has gathered the signatures of more than 40 representatives who refuse to back a health bill that contains the restrictions, said the bishops had been allowed to overstep their bounds.
"No one group should get to dictate the outcome of legislation in Congress," DeGette said. "Every group should be listened to, but I don’t think one group should be given veto authority over what we do." [LOL! Well… other groups had their say. The problem this time is that someone listened also to the bishops!]