Biretta tip to Jon o{]:¬) for alerting me to a story in the London Times on the issue of the "restoration" of the older, "Tridentine" form of Mass to greater use in the Church. Keep in mind that this article was written by Ruth Gledhill and Richard Owen, who provided us a while back with one of the stupidest articles I have ever read in a serious paper. Here is the text, with my emphasis and comments, from the Times:
Pope set to bring back Latin Mass that divided the Church [Another candidate…]
By Ruth Gledhill and Richard OwenTHE Pope is taking steps to revive the ancient tradition of the Latin Tridentine Mass in Catholic churches worldwide, according to sources in Rome.
Pope Benedict XVI is understood to have signed a universal indult — or permission — for priests to celebrate again the Mass used throughout the Church for nearly 1,500 years. The indult could be published in the next few weeks, sources told The Times. ["Sources" mentioned twice so far… gratis asseritur, gratis negatur, right?]
Use of the Tridentine Mass, parts of which date from the time of St Gregory in the 6th century and which takes its name from the 16th-century Council of Trent, was restricted by most bishops after the reforms of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65).
This led to the introduction of the new Mass in the vernacular to make it more accessible to contemporary audiences. By bringing back Mass in Latin, Pope Benedict is signalling that his sympathies lie with conservatives in the Catholic Church. ["NEWSSS FLASSHH!! BENEDICT ALIGNED WITH CONSERVATIVES!!!]
One of the most celebrated rebels against its suppression was Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who broke with Rome in 1988 over this and other reforms. He was excommunicated after he consecrated four bishops, one of them British, without permission from the Pope.
This is the part that goes blah blah blah, so I cut it.
The new indult would permit any priest to introduce the Tridentine Mass to his church, anywhere in the world, unless his bishop has explicitly forbidden it in writing. [And I imagine that vicars general everywhere are being sent out two by two to buy new boxes of Biks for their bishops. They will burn through them pretty fast in those first, heady days of "freedom".]
Catholic bloggers have been anticipating the indult for months. The Cornell Society blog says that Father Martin Edwards, a London priest, was told by Cardinal Joseph Zen, of Hong Kong, that the indult had been signed. Cardinal Zen is alleged to have had this information from the Pope himself in a private meeting. [A SOURCE!! And it is our favorite CARDINAL ZEN!!!]“There have been false alarms before, not least because within the Curia there are those genuinely well-disposed to the Latin Mass, those who are against and those who like to move groups within the Church like pieces on a chessboard,” a source told The Times. “But hopes have been raised with the new pope. It would fit with what he has said and done on the subject. He celebrated in the old rite, when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.”
The 1962 Missal issued by Pope John XXIII was the last of several revisions of the 1570 Missal of Pius V. In a lecture in 2001, Cardinal Ratzinger said that it would be “fatal” for the Missal to be “placed in a deep-freeze, left like a national park, a park protected for the sake of a certain kind of people, for whom one leaves available these relics of the past”. [But that is not what Benedict ever thought would happen. He knows that a tertium quid will go forth organically from the influence each rite will exert on the other.]
Daphne McLeod, chairman of Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice, a UK umbrella group that campaigns for the restoration of traditional orthodoxy, said: “A lot of young priests are teaching themselves the Tridentine Mass because it is so beautiful and has prayers that go back to the Early Church.” [Right. And it is because of this, among other reasons, that their celebrations of the Mass with the Novus Ordo are so much better than many have been in the past few decades.]
TRADITIONAL SERVICE
# The Tridentine Mass is celebrated entirely in Latin, except for a few words and phrases in Greek and Hebrew. There are long periods of silence and the priest has his back to the congregation [WRONGG!! Everyone is facing the same direction!]# In 1570, Pope St Pius V said that priests could use the Tridentine rite forever, “without scruple of conscience or fear of penalty” [Of course you have to understand that "forever" in that context meant until the next Pope made a change. Also, Pius allowed older rites to be used in certain local Churches, provided that no one be forbidden to use also the Missale Romanum at will.]
# Since the Second Vatican Council, the Tridentine Mass has been almost entirely superseded by the Mass of Pope Paul VI
# Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who took the lead in opposing the reforms, continued to celebrate the old Mass at his seminary in Ecône, Switzerland, and formed a dissident group. He was excommunicated in 1988
# The advantages of the Mass, according to the faithful, are in its uniformity and the fact that movements and gestures are prescribed, so that there is no room for “personalisation” [Well… not entirely accurate. But the older form of Mass surely does tend to "control" the priest.]
Okay, folks. I am guessing that the leaks were on purpose in order to create storm of opposition against Benedict’s plans, if they are indeed his plans. Loose lips sink ships, after all. That is what happened when "the Document" was on the Pope’s desk back in the late 80’s. Sad but true. Very sad but true.
Dear all
Very interesting – but as usual we will have to wait and see… As a priest who offers the Tridentine Rite daily and who recentlt gave a study weekend to recently ordained priests comparing the old and new rites – I concur with Fr John ref this knowledge improves both celebrations of the rites.
Certainly I pray that such an indult may be forthcoming… but after what happened last time ref 1988 and what Ecclesia Dei Adflicta should have originally would’ve granted… I await with bated breath the new “document”… While there has been much recently spoken and written by the Holy Father himself indicating a distinct preference for the older rite… we shall have to see if he is prepared to make it happpen despite the inevitable threats of the modernist Bishops…?!
Hmm, I wonder if the folks at the BBC hate the Catholic Church. One does get the distinct impression that they aren’t capable of fairlyand honestly reporting news/rumors about the Catholic Church.
I am guessing that the leaks were on purpose in order to create storm of opposition against Benedict’s plans
Another possibility might be leaks intended to create an atmosphere of inevitability that makes something tangible actually follow an eventual papal statement. As opposed to some fine statements of John Paul II that disappeared silently beneath the waves and were soon forgotten (by most). Might Benedict be a student (if not child) of the 1960’s? When persistent rumor in the press was the modus operandi, especially regarding liturgical change; however awful it might sound, when you’d heard about it long enough, it actually happened.
Ms. Gledhill has a tin ear when it comes to reporting anything Catholic. And the headline writer needs a vacation, IMHO.
Henry, perhaps… perhaps. You are of the Glass Half Full School, I think.
Um, instead of “folks at the BBC,” I meant to say the folks in the British media. Duh.
Anyway, on the subject of the “universal indult,” I just saw this at EWTN today:
http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=72164
“…contemporary audiences”! That about says it all, doesn’t it. It’s a PERFORMANCE, folks!
Aha, now CNS has picked up the story:
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0605776.htm
If bishops can forbid it, we might as well forget it.
What good is that? The Holy Father might as well not do
it, if he’s going to give bishops veto power.
Séamas: Keep in mind that the Council for Legislative Texts was involved, so there will be some norms involved. After all, there must be some order in the Church and the bishops are a constitutive dimension of every local Church. We cannot simply sideline bishops in their own dioceses on these important issues. It would be far better to provide good norms and then work, work, work with them, kindly and with patience and charity.
Good to read about my old Roman friend, Fr Martin Edwards.
I wonder whether these were liberal leaks, simply because according to them the deed is already done. It seems to me much like Sodano’s retirement, which was leaked to the world wide press.
It is a different situation than with JPII, who is said to have had no inclinations toward restoring the Latin liturgy or the 1962 Missal. The mid 80’s push came from Cardinal Ratzinger and a few others, and it was undermined by bishops from France and Germany (where of course the Church is all but supine).
Papa Ratzinger’s liturgical opinions have long been made public in his books.