INTERVIEW: One of my profs in Rome Dr. John Rist with Ed Pentin: The Catholic Church Could Be Facing a Crisis Worse Than the Arian Controversy of the 4th Century

Ed Pentin, surely Rome’s best English language commentator on Church matters these days, has an interview with Dr. John Rist, a professor at Cambridge and also in Rome at my school, the Patristic Instititute Augustinianum.  I had several courses from him.

Rist has a piece in the recently published The Faith Once For All Delivered: Doctrinal Authority in Catholic Theology,a set of important essays by world class scholars with forward and afterword by Cardinals Burke and Sarah.   It is about sensus fidelium.  VERY IMPORTANT.  US HERE – UK HERE

I’ve written about Rist’s brilliant, hard, books over the years.  HERE  You can read about how he was cancelled in 2019 by the Vatican after he signed a letter critical of Francis.  He was banned from all pontifical institutions.  CUA even cancelled his Festschrift.

Rist was interviewed by Pentin now probably because Rist has a new book which is to be released 27 June 2023 (tomorrow, as I write):

Infallibility, Integrity and Obedience: The Papacy and the Roman Catholic Church, 1848-2023 US HERE – UK HERE

BTW… go to amazon and take a look at the titles that John M Rist as authored or written for. Amazing.

The interview deals throughout also with treatment of an Italian priest Fr Tullio Rotondo who was suspended a divinis by his bishop because he wrote a book critical of Francis and his collaborators.

Here’s a taste:

PENTIN It’s also one thing for a bishop to shut down heresy and heterodoxy, but if it’s orthodoxy, or trying to emphasize orthodox arguments, that’s very odd, isn’t it?

As I say, because Don Tullio has got a position which he’s trying to advocate, and he’s done so by producing material on either side, and has then tried to evaluate it — what the French would call a catalogue raisonné. That, of course, is how things should be sorted out. It’s exactly what people should be doing. Don Tullio has a doctorate in theology. It’s his job to think about these kind of things. And because some bishop doesn’t like his conclusions… Put it this way: this book couldn’t have been written in the time of John Paul II or Benedict XVI, but had it been, he would not have been banned by his bishop. Let’s forget about Amoris Laetitia, if he’d discussed the subject matter of an encyclical, and related matters in the times of Benedict and John Paul, or let alone John XXIII, or Paul VI, for that matter, people would have said, “Yeah, it’s a bit pedantic, long-winded and so on, but of course very useful.” It would not have led to him being suspended by his bishop. Undoubtedly, it would not.

PENTIN What does it tell us about this time in the Church?

Well, Don Tullio cites me, and others, in the interview which he gave to Maike Hickson, as well as, for example, John Finnis, who was a professor of law at Oxford, saying that the present crisis is probably the worst the Church has had for centuries, perhaps from its beginning, in some way or another. It’s more dangerous to the existence of the Church. You can compare the Reformation, but I think it’s even more serious than that. You’ve got to go back to the Arian controversy to find something comparable. But I think that, in terms of the damage that it now might cause, what might happen to the Church in the future, this is going to cause more trouble, more than anything else we’ve seen before.

 

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in Francis, Hard-Identity Catholicism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Comments

  1. BeautifulSavior says:

    I read The Faith once for all delivered, and gave one away!
    I’m currently reading all four books published by Fr Mawdsley! I’m about to do the same with these books!
    20 minutes homilies are not enough to gain a good understanding of the Faith!
    I once heard someone say: you don’t know where you are going if you don’t know where you came from.
    Many of us are standing still, not looking back and very confused about the future! Read these books!

  2. summorumpontificum777 says:

    Prof. Rist absolutely nails it in identifying the core problems, chief among them being the ahistorical nature of the modern papacy. Any honest historian will agree with Rist that the papacy we’ve had for the last 200 years is quite different than the papacy that existed in the previous 1800 years. The naysayers in the Vatican I era have been vindicated. The office is too powerful for its own good and, as we’ve seen, there’s no mechanism to prevent bad pope(s) from taking a wrecking ball to the liturgy, the catechism and anything else they please. The situation is unsustainable.

  3. Gaetano says:

    “They are destined to be lost; their god is the stomach; they glory in what they should think shameful, since their minds are set on earthly things.”
    Philippians 3:19

  4. Cornelius says:

    Dr. Rist perfectly encapsulates why I get so weary with those who say, “oh, we’ve had bad Popes before and it no big deal . . . Pope Shakeypants VI back in the 10th century fathered several children out of wedlock!”

    The present situation vastly overshadows even the errors of Popes Vigilius, Honorius, and John XXII . . . in comparison to what we’re seeing today, their heresies seem like minor faux pas.

  5. Not says:

    I have known and read about Priest who have been cancelled. What is disturbing is all of these Priest belong to Orders with Rules and Procedures. I have found that when the powers that be want to cancel them, the rules don’t apply.
    Do they hire a Canon Lawyer? I know a Priest who was forced to sue two Bishops in Civil Court. He won, but he is stil Cancelled. God Help Us.

  6. Pingback: THVRSDAY AFTERNOON EDITION – Big Pulpit

  7. Venerator Sti Lot says:

    Thank you for pointing this out!

    And now I see Edward Pentin also has a three part filmed interview-discussion with the Rists conducted in May…

Comments are closed.