QUAERITUR: Eucharistic fast… AFTER Communion? Wherein Fr. Z rants.

From a reader:

I heard recently that there is a rule that after receiving Holy Communion, a person should not eat for fifteen minutes (I think because that’s how long the Body of Christ is in us after Communion).

Most of the time, this wouldn’t pose an issue because with the prayers after Communion and after Mass it would be longer than 15 minutes after Communion before people even get out of the church. But at my college ___ we have Daily Mass before lunch. The Mass is very quick, and I believe that many times Mass gets out and people go and get lunch before the fifteen-minute period after Communion is over. Is there actually such a 15-minute rule? If there is, I’d like to spread the word around my campus to make sure people aren’t breaking their fasts!

There is a law, risible as it may be, applicable to most people to fast for one hour before reception of Holy Communion.  I say most people, because sometimes there are special circumstances and I risible because an hour is… simply put… not enough, in my humble opinion.  But it is the law of the Latin Church.  Also, the one hour is before reception of Communion and not, as some people mistakenly think, before the beginning of Mass.  Some Masses are long enough that you could be eating your pork and beans on the way up the stairs of the church and still be okay for reception of Communion.

There is no law concerning fasting after reception of Communion.

There is, however, a rule of thumb.

It is usually suggested that you allow at least 15 minutes to pass before taking food.

The reason for this is grounded in our belief that, after the consecration, as long as the accidents of bread remain, then the Eucharistic Christ is truly present.  Once the substance is broken, and we can no longer discern the accidents of what was bread, then Christ is no longer sacramentally present.  It probably takes about 15 minutes – on the safe side – for the Host to be changed in the process of swallowing and digestion to the point where it is no longer the Eucharist.

If we truly believe what we say we believe about the Eucharist, doesn’t it seem right to stay and pray a bit even after Mass and say “Thank you!” to our Lord?

So, the good rule of thumb is about 15 minutes.  And it turns out that in some parishes there are enough announcements and other blabblab that 15 minutes are eaten up, if you’ll pardon the pun.

Friends, we should cultivate the practice, and set a good example for others, by remaining in church in prayer of thanksgiving after Holy Mass concludes.  Fathers!  Bishops! You should talk about this as well!

Let us promote reverent silence for prayer after Mass! Rise up against the profaning of our churches by kneeling down in silent and prayerful thanksgiving!

Unite!  Promote the new evangelization!  Reclaim the sacred spaces of our churches!

Take our churches back from jabbering cretins who fill the air after Mass with their relentlessly mundane GABBLE!!!

ehem

No, there is no law.  But it is a good thing to remember after Mass on your way to the doughnut line.

Here is a prayer that you could learn and recite after Holy Mass during which you dared to receive Communion:

A Prayer For After Mass

I give thanks to Thee, O Lord, most holy, Father almighty, eternal God, that Thou hast vouchsafed, for no merit of mine own, but out of Thy pure mercy, to appease the hunger of my soul with the precious body and blood of Thy Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ. Humbly I implore Thee, let not this holy communion be to me an increase of guilt unto my punishment, but an availing plea unto pardon and salvation. Let it be to me the armour of faith and the shield of good will. May it root out from my heart all vice; may it utterly subdue my evil passions and all my unruly desires. May it perfect me in charity and patience; in humility and obedience; and in all other virtues. May it be my sure defence against the snares laid for me by my enemies, visible and invisible. May it restrain and quiet all my evil impulses, and make me ever cleave to Thee Who art the one true God. May I owe to it a happy ending of my life. And do Thou, O heavenly Father, vouchsafe one day to call me, a sinner, to that ineffable banquet, where Thou, together with Thy Son and the Holy Ghost, art to Thy saints true and unfailing light, fullness of content, joy for evermore, gladness without alloy, consummate and everlasting happiness.  Through the same Christ our Lord.  Amen.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged ,
38 Comments

QUAERITUR: Confusion about celebrating parish, patronal feasts

From a reader:

The Parish to which I belong is dedicated to the Patronage of a Saint Gianna Beretta Molla (April 28) and the Parish Church (brick and mortar) is dedicated to Saint Bernadette Soubirous (April 16). Canon Law prohibits changing the name of a church once it is dedicated to a specific saint, etc. However, in the current U.S.A. Ordo, Saint Gianna is not yet listed and St. Bernadette is only mentioned in the Ordo for February 11 (Our Lady of Lourdes) with no option of celebrating her feast on April 16. (Perhaps that is because in 2013 April 16 fell within the Easter Season). If this parish wishes to honor their patronesses on the dates of their feasts what options do they have? I can understand if these dates were on a Sunday, but in the future, may the option for celebrating the Mass for A Holy Woman be used for Saint Gianna and the option for a Religious be used for Saint Bernadette?

You will find at the beginning of the Roman Missal a table of liturgical days (also here).
This should tells us all we need to know.

Regardless of whether a particular saint is on the General Calendar, or the Particular Calendar of a nation or a diocese, if a parish is dedicated to that saint, his or her feast is “on the calendar” for that parish.

A helpful guide is HERE.

Unless 28 April or 16 April fall on a higher-ranked celebration (such as Easter or Ascension), the parish celebrates its titular feast day and the titular feast day of the parish church.  Patronal/titular feasts are ranked as solemnities, but proper solemnities rather than solemnities such as the important feasts of the Lord or Our Blessed Mother and so forth.    So, we should give proper liturgical observance to the patron of the place, the titular patron saint of the church and also the anniversary of the dedication of the church building.

If the pastor wants to transfer the celebration to a Sunday of Ordinary Time, he should consult with the local bishop about the praxis of the diocese. The local diocesan bishop can grant permission (and this is fairly common, I think) to transfer the celebration.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
6 Comments

Pope Francis, the Devil, and You

The Holy Father, Pope Francis, talks frequently about the Devil.

This is another example of how Francis is, in his preaching, a bit more concrete than Benedict.

During his fervorino for Mass today, Pope Francis spoke about the “prince of this world”.

“We can safeguard the Church, we can cure the Church, no? We do so with our work, but what’s most important is what the Lord does : He is the only One who can look into the face of evil and overcome it. The prince of the world comes but can do nothing against me: if we don’t want the prince of this world to take the Church into his hands, we must entrust it to the One who can defeat the prince of this world. Here the question arises: do we pray for the Church, for the entire Church? For our brothers and sisters whom we do not know, everywhere in the world? It is the Lord’s Church and in our prayer we say to the Lord: Lord, look at your Church … It’ s yours. Your Church is [made up of] our brothers and sisters. This is a prayer that must come from our heart”.

My friends, the Devil is real. Francis sure believes in the Enemy.

Let’s review.

The Devil and the fallen angels hate you.

They have angelic abilities. They never sleep, never tire, are never distracted, have no need to travel from point a to b, and they never miss what you are up to.

Think this through.

Imagine what sort of profile on you some government agency could put together.

Imagine that government agencies wanted to build a psychological profile of you, much as the FBI might when they use clues and evidence to hunt down an unknown serial killer.

So these government agents … just to make this fun, let’s call it The Agency (under Obama’s fourth term), teamed up with his newly minted Domestic Security Force, are profiling Catholics… because they are probably terrorists and dissidents and refuse to worship Moloch and offer sacrifices of incense to the statue of the POTUS.

The Agency and DSF start to plot your movements through your mobile phone as you move in and out of cells which they monitor to triangulate your location.  They learn something about you through your patterns of travel.  They learn about your tastes and interests through your purchasing history.  They monitor your calls, where you go on the internet, what you write and read in your email and on webpages.  They look at all your online transactions. Through your credit card records they hunt up the actual receipts and examine what you bought at every store…  including those embarrassing things.  After all, you leave amazingly information-rich and detailed trails and clues to who you are with every move and purchase.  The Agency and DSF review all your library checkouts, your magazine subscriptions, your movie going habits, your DVD choices through Netflix or digital downloads through iTunes.  They watch your channel selections through your cable or satellite. All this information can be mined.  They watch your every interaction with your friends… and strangers too, for that matter, with listening devices and cameras.  After gathering all this information, the Agency’s profiling experts build a picture of you, get into your head.   They figure out what you are about, who you are, and what you going to do next.

They are merely humans with a lot of bits of information.

How much better can fallen angels, the demons do this?

Angels, the holy angels and the fallen, have missed nothing of your live since the instant of your conception.  And they never forget anything.

Fallen angels, the enemy, the Devil, can’t literally get into our heads or thoughts or touch our will, but they don’t have to in order to know us really well.

And they hate you.   They hate you.  They hate you.

With relentless malice the “prince of this world” will work to trick you into letting him have some control in your life.  Demons will cleverly and with perfect timing stimulate appetites and passions based on how well they know your proclivities.   They strive to twist your heart and mind away from God in order to diminish even by a little the love everyone will share in heaven as they shine in the magnified glory of the Trinity.

The Devil and other demons are always held in check by God.  They cannot simply have their way with us or the material cosmos around us unless God permits it according to His plan.   But they are devious and tireless.

It is good that Pope Francis talks about the Devil, the enemy of our soul, the prince of this world.

Remember your Guardian Angels.  Call on them to help you.  Remember Our Lady, Queen of Angels.  Remember St. Joseph, whom we invoke in his beautiful litany as the “Terror daemonum… the Terror of demons”.

Examine your consciences and go to confession.

The Sacrament of Penance is a mighty weapon against the demonic agents of Hell.

A good confession can put to flight the dark legion that seeks your downfall.

A good confession prompts the angels and saints to raise joyful praise to God in their longing for you someday to be happy with them in heaven.

UPDATE 18:31 GMT:

The nice people at Catholic News Service sent an email to alert me to this video.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Francis, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

What homosexual “marriage” advocates are really after

This was sent by an alert reader.

From the site of the Illinois Family Institute earlier in April comes this.

Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage Written

By Micah Clark | 04.06.13

Even knowing that there are radicals in all movements, doesn’t lessen the startling admission recently by lesbian journalist Masha Gessen. On a radio show she actually admits that homosexual activists are lying about their radical political agenda. She says that they don’t want to access the institution of marriage; they want to radically redefine and eventually eliminate it.

Here is what she recently said on a radio interview:

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.

The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.

I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, [Ahhh… aren’t they all just soooo hip? Soooo superior?  That’s what the MSM and entertainment industry would have you think by their portrayal of them.] and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

(Source HERE)

[…]

Read the rest there.

Remember this when you read something on a dissident site such as the Fishwrap that we need to evolve in our view of same-sex unions or “marriage”.

Posted in Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
74 Comments

Tensions

I have been thinking a lot about Gregorian chant these days.  As often happens when I am pecking away at a subject, someone sends me a link to something useful.

There is a series of videos on YouTube in French taken from VHS of a course on Gregorian chant by the monks of Solesmes. If you have French, even remotely, you will find them interesting.  They are not the final word and they are dated, but they are helpful.

One thing caught my eye in the video Le chant grégorien à Solesmes (4) : Modes, impacts, Legato.  This inscription is displayed – I assume that it is at Solesmes, if not in the church then in the monastery – while a chant is played as a demonstration of a point that was made.

There is always going to be a tension between the insights of the past and the insights of the present, especially as we learn more and develop and deepen our understanding of an aspect of the Faith.  There is also always a tension in this life between authority (external to us) and one’s own will.  This applies to doctrine, as Bl. John Henry Newman pointed out, and to our liturgical worship, as Pope Benedict XVI so ably underscored.  Bringing these elements into harmony can be the task of a lifetime.  The inscription above provides a good starting point.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
4 Comments

Pope Francis on sin, the virtue of feeling shame, and confession

Pope Francis continues to talk about sin and confession.

I have no idea if Francis’ little fervorini are going to wind up published in Acta Apostolicae Sedis, but they have some real meat.  He is speaking more or less “a braccio“, off-the-cuff, but you can tell that he has some game.

One of the reasons why I like Francis’ preaching is that he is concrete.  In some ways he is more concrete than Benedict was.   I also like the fact that Francis is willing to reveal unpolished moments.

From the site of Vatican Radio we find a partial account (rather than a full text) of Pope Francis’ daily fervorino.

Commenting on the First Letter of St. John, which states ” God is light, and in him there is no darkness at all,” Francis Pope pointed out that “we all have darkness in our lives,” moments “where everything, even our consciousness, is in the dark”, but this – he pointed out – does not mean we walk in darkness:

“Walking in darkness means being overly pleased with ourselves, believing that we do not need salvation. That is darkness! When we continue on this road of darkness, it is not easy to turn back. Therefore, John continues, because this way of thinking made him reflect: ‘If we say we are without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us‘. [Watch this…] Look to your sins, to our sins, we are all sinners, all of us … This is the starting point. But if we confess our sins, He is faithful, He is so just He forgives us our sins, cleansing us from all unrighteousness…The Lord who is so good, so faithful, so just that He forgives.”

When the Lord forgives us, He does justice” – continued the Pope – first to himself, “because He came to save and forgive“, [“Save”?  It is almost as if Francis believes in propitiation!]welcoming us with the tenderness of a Father for his children: “The Lord is tender towards those who fear, [“Fear”?  It is almost as if Francis believes in reverence.] to those who come to Him “and with tenderness,” He always understand us”. He wants to gift us the peace that only He gives. ” [Here we go!  Sacrament of Penance…] “This is what happens in the Sacrament of Reconciliation” even though “many times we think that going to confession is like going to the dry cleaner” to clean the dirt from our clothes:

“But Jesus in the confessional is not a dry cleaner: it is an encounter with Jesus, but with this Jesus who waits for us, who waits for us just as we are. “But, Lord, look … this is how I am”, we are often ashamed to tell the truth: ‘I did this, I thought this’. But shame [It: vergogna] is a true Christian virtue, [“Shame”?  The readers of the Fishwrap aren’t going to like this.] and even human … the ability to be ashamed: [Here is one of those moments I mentioned at the top…] I do not know if there is a similar saying in Italian, but in our country to those who are never ashamed are called “sin vergüenza’: this means ‘the unashamed ‘, because they are people who do not have the ability to be ashamed and to be ashamed is a virtue of the humble, of the man and the woman who are humble. ”

Pope Francis continued: “ we must have trust, because when we sin we have an advocate with the Father, “Jesus Christ the righteous.” And He “supports us before the Father” and defends us in front of our weaknesses. But you need to stand in front of the Lord “with our truth of sinners”, “with confidence, even with joy, without masquerading… We must never masquerade before God.And shame is a virtue: “blessed shame.” “This is the virtue that Jesus asks of us: humility and meekness”.

“Humility and meekness are like the frame of a Christian life. A Christian must always be so, humble and meek. And Jesus waits for us to forgive us. We can ask Him a question: Is going to confession like to a torture session? [Excellent.  I have often remarked that the confession is not The Rack.] No! It is going to praise God, because I, a sinner , have been saved by Him. And is He waiting for me to beat me? No, with tenderness to forgive me. And if tomorrow I do the same? Go again, and go and go and go …. He always waits for us. This tenderness of the Lord, this humility, this meekness …. ”

This confidence, concluded Pope Francis “gives us room to breathe.” “The Lord give us this grace, the courage to always go to Him with the truth, because the truth is light and not the darkness of half-truths or lies before God. It give us this grace! So be it. “

I am please, dear readers, to report that Pope Francis wants you to examine your consciences, to feel shame for your sins, and then to …

GO TO CONFESSION!

 

Posted in Francis, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
35 Comments

Video from the Mass in Boston (FANTASTIC BOYS CHOIR ALERT!)

The other day I had the great privilege of celebrating a Solemn Mass at St. Paul’s, the parish for Harvard University.  The music was provided by the Boston Archdiocesan Boy’s Choir.  They have the only boys’ choir school in the United States.  And can they sing!

Someone posted on YouTube a couple mobile phone videos from the Mass.  The videos aren’t great, but you can hear something of the wonderful music.  They did Victoria’s Missa Quarti Toni and Palestrina’s Sicut cervus, which almost always leaves me choked up.

Introit:

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

I think they need to work a bit on shaping the beginnings and ends of phrases.  But, hey!

Sicut cervus

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Sanctus – Consecration – Benedictus

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

This was the first time that the Boys Choir sang from the choir loft in, apparently, many years.  It was a huge success and they sounded spectacular.

The Mass was wonderful.  Everyone involved in the organization and celebration have reason to be proud of the beautiful thing that was done for God.

The great Fathers Jay Finelli and Thomas Kocik were there in choir!  Bloggers both.  It was a pleasure to see them.

An action shot.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
43 Comments

Women-priest fakers allow Protestants to define who Catholics are. There must be consequences.

When anti-Catholic ecumenical atrocities take place, Catholic bishops should act.

Here is an example which calls for consequences.

From WTAX in Kentucky:

Kentucky woman ordained as priest in defiance of Roman Catholic Church [Note either the carelessness or the bias? She was not ordained as anything.]

By Mary Wisniewski

LOUISVILLE, Kentucky (Reuters) – In an emotional ceremony filled with tears and applause, a 70-year-old Kentucky woman was ordained a priest [No.  She went through a fake ceremony.] on Saturday as part of a dissident group operating outside of official Roman Catholic Church authority. [Liberals often use the word “official” as code.  Watch for code.]

Rosemarie Smead is one of about 150 women around the world who have decided not to wait for the Roman Catholic Church to lift its ban on women priests, but to be ordained and start their own congregations.

In an interview before the ceremony, Smead said she is not worried about being excommunicated from the Church – the fate of other women ordained outside of Vatican law.

“It has no sting for me,” said Smead, a petite, gray-haired former Carmelite nun with a ready hug for strangers. [What slop.] “It is a Medieval bullying stick the bishops used to keep control over people and to keep the voices of women silent. I am way beyond letting octogenarian men tell us how to live our lives.” [Wayyyy beyond.]

The ordination of women as priests, along with the issues of married priests and birth control, represents one of the big divides between U.S. Catholics and the Vatican hierarchy. [And it is the writer’s objective to widen the divide. Note also how the “issues” are not easily related.] Seventy percent of U.S. Catholics believe that women should be allowed to be priests, according to a New York Times/CBS News poll earlier this year.

The former pope, Benedict XVI, reaffirmed the Catholic Church’s ban on women priests [“ban  on women priests” requires the premise that there is such a thing as a woman priest.  There isn’t.] and warned that he would not tolerate disobedience by clerics on fundamental teachings. Male priests have been stripped of their holy orders [No.  That’s impossible.  Holy Orders confer an indelible mark on the soul that can’t be “stripped”.  They have been “stripped” of permission to function as a priest.] for participating in ordination ceremonies for women.

In a statement last week, Louisville Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz called the planned ceremony by the Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests a “simulated ordination” in opposition to Catholic teaching.

“The simulation of a sacrament carries very serious penal sanctions in Church law, and Catholics should not support or participate in Saturday’s event,” Kurtz said.

The Catholic Church teaches that it has no authority to allow women to be priests because Jesus Christ chose only men as his apostles. Proponents of a female priesthood said Jesus was acting only according to the customs of his time.

They also note that he chose women, like Mary Magdalene, as disciples, and that the early Church had women priests, deacons and bishops. [Which is not true.]

[HERE, folks, is a big problem….] The ceremony, held at St. Andrew United Church of Christ in Louisville, was attended by about 200 men and women. Many identified themselves to a Reuters reporter as Catholics, but some declined to give their names or their churches.

[…]

The rest of the piece is rubbish.

Here’s the bottom line.  Antics like this should have consequences for ecumenical dialogue.

The women’s ordination thing is silliness.  It is a circus.

A Protestant church hosted the circus.  They gave the Catholic Church the finger.

There should be consequences.

We either take ecumenism seriously or we don’t. If we do – and I believe we must –  we have to react strongly when ecumenical ideals are so grossly violated by Protestants who invite or permit these “women priest” ceremonies in their churches.

The most sacred rites of the Catholic Church are Holy Mass and ordination to Holy Orders.

They effectively trampled rites that we Catholics hold as sacred.

These silly Catholic women-priest supporters are committing sacrilege in simulating Mass and Orders.

However, the Protestants who host them are assisting in a mockery of our Holy Mass and a mockery of our priesthood.

For a long time progressivist Catholics were staging Jewish sedar meals in their churches.  Some Jews were angered by this.  We got the message from the Jews and stopped doing what was offensive to them.

By allowing this group of fakers into their churches, those Protestants accepted the premise that what those women play at is actually a Catholic ordination and a Mass.

How dare PROTESTANTS decide what a Catholic Mass is?

And if they respond, “Gee, we mean no disrespect. We are just giving space to this group”, then what they are doing is aiding a protest against the Catholic Church.

There is no way around this.

Protestants who give these fakers aid are either on their side, and thus support their claim that what they are doing really is an ordination and Mass, or in claiming not to be taking sides they are still giving support to an anti-Catholic protest.

Bishops have to take action when offensive, anti-Catholic things like this take place.

Upon hearing the news that this ceremony is going to take place (or has taken place), the local Catholic bishop must call the pastor of that Protestant parish and say, “I’m the Catholic Bishop.  Do not allow this sacrilege to be committed in your church. You wouldn’t do this for a group of dissident Jews wanting to ordain rabbis, but we are Catholics so you don’t care what offense you give us.  Until an apology is issued, don’t look for us to dialogue with you again.”

Then that Catholic bishop should call the head of the denomination and convey the same message.

Then that Catholic Bishop should send an informative note to the USCCB’s ecumenical office and to the CDF and to the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity to let them know the facts of the sacrileges that took place and who helped them.

Then that Catholic bishop should call the press and give them his view about the offense the Protestants gave and the damage they inflicted on ecumenical dialogue.

True ecumenism does not consist in lying down and letting some other church kick you and define what Mass is for you, or say who can be ordained, or stick their “F-You” finger in your face by hosting these sacrilegious fakers.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , , , ,
98 Comments

My view for a while

With regret, leaving Boston.

20130427-161041.jpg

It was a great trip. Thanks to everyone, especially my kind host at Harvard.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
12 Comments

“Mr. Jesuit”

I spent some time today with students at Boston College (which for a fan of Golden Gopher hockey took some doing).

Among the many interesting things I saw and heard about was a statue of St. Ignatius of Loyola, variously described as Ignatius holding an invisible baby in a hurricane and, by tour guides, “Mr. Jesuit who founded Boston College.”

20130427-145948.jpg

The trees are flowing. All around the area there are magnificent flowers. Every time I travel to the East Coast I remark on how beautiful the flowers and trees are.

20130427-150007.jpg

20130427-150014.jpg

I then went over to see something of nearby St. John’s Seminary and talk with some seminarians.   They have a beautiful chapel, which is going to see more renovation, which will include putting Our Lord back in the center.

 

20130427-151056.jpg

Sadly, I was not able to greet the new rector (after his first full year still new, I guess), Msgr. Moroney, a fellow warrior in the translation campaigns of yore.  I hear good things about what is going on at St. John’s.  Small confirmations that the silly season really is coming to a close in most places.

Posted in Brick by Brick, On the road, Seminarians and Seminaries, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , , ,
14 Comments