Fr. Z’s Blog 2014 Person of the Year

  • Whereas His Eminence is a fierce and constant defender and promoter of justice for all parties in service of the Truth,
  • Whereas His Eminence willingly celebrates Holy Mass in the Extraordinary Form,
  • Whereas His Eminence is kind to children,
  • Whereas His Eminence contributes to scholarly books in defense of Holy Matrimony,
  • Whereas His Eminence humbly submits to the proper garb appropriate for his office and role in the Church,
  • Whereas His Eminence does not eschew the cappa magna,
  • Whereas His Eminence is from these United States of America,
  • Whereas His Eminence is going to be “papabile”,
  • Whereas His Eminence speaks in clear terms about Catholic doctrine when speaking to the press,
  • Whereas His Eminence has extensive pastoral experience,
  • Whereas His Eminence continues to support and frequent the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Wisconsin,
  • Whereas His Eminence generously spends time to travel to support new religious institutes and Catholic schools,
  • Whereas His Eminence now gives spiritual support to one of the world’s most effective charitable organizations,
  • Whereas His Eminence supports the Cause of Fr. John Hardon, SJ,
  • Whereas His Eminence sponsors an annual Canon Law Conference,
  • Whereas His Eminence participates in conferences on Sacred Liturgy and Holy Priesthood,
  • Whereas His Eminence provided unparalleled service as Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura,

Fr. Z’s Blog has named His Eminence Raymond Leo Card. Burke, Person of the Year for 2014.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
35 Comments

ASK FATHER: Who should cleanse vessels during Mass?

first ablutionFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My priest barely pours water into one chalice and swishes it in all four to cleanse. He consumes it and doesn’t wipe them out but passes them over to the Eucharistic Ministers to wipe out after Mass. Is this acceptable?

Purification, or cleansing of a vessel includes the addition of water (and, necessarily wine in the Extraordinary Form), the consumption of that water, and the careful wiping out of the chalice or ciborium. If the priest has other Eucharistic Ministers to assist him with the purification, no problem: Eucharistic Ministers, by definition, are bishops and priests with deacons as Ordinary Ministers of Communion. If, on the other hand, he is having Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion (EMHCs) assist him with the purification of the vessels at the altar or at the credence table, that would be an abuse. If he has an instituted Acolyte assist him with in the sacristy after Mass, that would be acceptable.

Under normal circumstances it is neither hard nor time consuming to purify a chalice and ciborium. This is done all the time. Father should do it on the spot, at the altar, after Communion. Alas, the often unnecessary multiplication of lay distributors of Communion also multiplies the hardware to be cleansed. Reduction or elimination of unnecessary of EMHCs would reduce the number of vessels to be purified, which could, in turn, help to reduce the temptation of committing other liturgical abuses in regard to their purification.

Also, Fathers, please do be careful and diligent in the purification of vessels! I occasionally find particles on patens and in ciboria and chalices that were clearly cleansed in a sloppy, inattentive manner.

Moreover, priests and sacristans alike should ensure that purificators are made of good and absorbent material, such as linen. Once in a while I am confronted with a purificator which seems to be made of Gortex or some other water repellent fabric. All they seem to do is push the droplets around.

Don’t skimp on altar linens. Get the good stuff.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
20 Comments

ASK FATHER: Who can dispense Holy Day of Obligation?

lords leapingFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

A friend of mine just informed me that the Solemnity of Mary isn’t [wasn’t] a Holy Day of Obligation in the whole state of California. What ecclesiastical body has the authority to grant such dispensations?

In light of can. 87 of the 1983 Code for the Latin Church, a diocesan bishop can dispense from the obligation of a particular Sunday or Holy Day.

I suppose one might wonder when such a move would be appropriate. Off the top of my head, I can imagine a scenario wherein a major earthquake has devastated a city of the diocese. In that case, the people can simply can’t get to Mass are relieved of the obligation anyway, but there may be marginal cases that are harder to decide.

BONUS QUESTION

On a related point, another person asks…

My wife and I will be traveling to Los Angeles on New Years Day and were flabbergasted to learn that Jan 1st is not a Holy Day of Obligation in the Archdiocese of LA. We have a very busy day on the 1st and were hoping to find a church with a early Mass time. This is proving impossible (many of the churches in the area we will be staying in are even closed that day)!

If you travel to a place where the obligation to attend Mass has been lifted or dispensed, you do not have an obligation to hear Mass.

You are free to lament the zeitgeist that has so confused the liturgical calendar such that Holy Days are regularly moved, suppressed, or ignored, and that has twisted the calendar so far that, for example this year, the Three Kings arrive, not on the Twelfth Night, but on the Tenth Night … therefore lifting the obligation placed on true loves from sending Ladies Dancing and Lords a’Leaping to their sweethearts this year.

But, in those places where the obligation has been legitimately lifted by the authorities who have the power to do so, there is/was no obligation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
17 Comments

ASK FATHER: Father was sick, we went to Mass, now we’re sick too!

From a reader…

Our priest simply announced “I have the flu ” and proceeded with his sermon. Only a few , like me, refrained from receiving Holy Communion. My wife received and several days later she and I had it also. Since we are in our seventies and I am undergoing cancer treatment and many others are vulnerable to this life threatening illness it seems to me he should refrain from distribution entirely rather than recklessly infect a trusting group. What say you ?

First, I am really sorry that you have cancer.   If I had it my way, no one would have to suffer with cancer.   We can blame Eve for that.  Then blame Adam.   I am also sorry that you are ill.  Blame Eve.  Etc.

You have no idea where you picked up that flu bug.  No. Idea. At. All.

The priest is, however, a convenient target.

What is ironic in this is, had someone announced before Mass was scheduled to begin that Father was sick and he couldn’t make it, people would then grouse that he was coddling himself, that other people with real jobs can’t just take days off, that when parents get the flu, they still have to show up and be counted.  Or, had Father come, sick or not, then all sorts of people who were themselves sick, would then want to talk to Father about A, B or C.  They’d cough into their hands a few times and then want to shake Father’s hand after Mass, and even hang onto it for a while as they told him something.  But then when Father didn’t show for Mass the week after, because he was sick, they tisk and say that he ought to take better care of himself.

I am just getting over a nasty case of something that took me three weeks and antibiotics to shake.

Everyone… if you see that Father is ill, and you are concerned about picking up what he has, then don’t go to Communion if you are worried that that’s how diseases are transmitted, and, please, leave him alone after Mass.

Also, people are not obliged to receive Communion.  And yet so very many people today think that somehow, if they don’t go to Communion, they haven’t “been to Mass” or the haven’t “gotten anything”.  Communion is reduced to something … well… that everyone does because… well… that’s what you do.   You go forward, someone puts the white thing on your hand, and then you sing the song.  Okay… go to Communion when Father is sick and “get something”.

I repeat.  No one is obliged to go to Holy Communion.  Make a spiritual Communion.

I hope you feel better very soon.  Blessings.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
26 Comments

WaPo buried hit-and-run female Episcopalian “bishop” but highlighted Catholic lesbian Communion denial

From Newsbusters:

WashPost Buries Hit-and-Run Death Caused by Female Episcopalian Bishop; Front-Paged Catholic Lesbian Scandal

Which offense is more serious? [A] Denying a lesbian communion at a Catholic funeral? Or [B] a female Episcopalian bishop hitting and killing a bicyclist? The Washington Post has picked (A).[What a surprise.]In 2012, they splashed across the front page (with a picture) that lesbian activist Barbara Johnson was denied communion at her mother’s funeral. [Remember Fr. Guarnizo?]

On December 30, the Post [The Washington Post, that is…]buried a hit-and-run-bishop story on page B5 with the headline “Bishop put on leave after fatal crash: Episcopal diocese says Heather Cook drove car that killed bicyclist.”

The No. 2 Episcopal bishop in the Diocese of Maryland has been placed on administrative leave after she was involved in a car crash Saturday that killed a bicyclist.

Bishop Heather Elizabeth Cook, who is the bishop suffragan, or second bishop for the diocese of Maryland, which is headquartered in Baltimore, left the scene but returned later “to take responsibility for her actions,” her bishop said in a statement.

[…]

Court records show that Cook received “probation before judgment” in 2010 for a drinking and driving charge on the Eastern Shore, where she worked before becoming a bishop. She had been charged at the time with possession of marijuana paraphernalia as well. But those charges were dropped, and she successfully completed her probation. [Good candidate for “bishop”.]

On December 31, The Post ran another story on page B6 headlined “Bishop involved in fatal crash had a DUI arrest in 2010, and diocese knew.”

Leaders in the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland who this spring made Heather Elizabeth Cook a bishop – the diocese’s first female bishop – knew the ugly details of her 2010 drunk-driving arrest but determined “that this one mistake should not bar her for consideration as a leader,” the diocese said in a statement Tuesday.  [I want you, all you readers, to pause right now.  Pause for a moment.  Breathe in.  Breathe out.  Now… in the story substitute “Catholic” for “Episcopal” and “real bishop” for “pretend bishop”.  Imagine what the Washington Post would have done had this been a Catholic bishop who did a hit and run.  The national press, every sort of media, would be dancing around the chancery with torches and pig heads on spikes.]

[… lots of unpleasant details… and then…]

The Barbara Johnson [lesbian] communion scandal kept drawing stories on page B-1 or in the A-section, unlike these hit-and-run bishop stories in 2012 (not counting editorials):

March 12: Priest is placed on leave from ministry (Page B-1)
March 15: Priest disputes archdiocese’s account (Page B-1)
March 18: Two unusual Catholics create firestorm (Page A-17, 2499 words) [!]

The Washington Post also creditably stuck to the story of Rabbi Barry Freundel and his improper taping and exploitation of unclothed women in ritual baths. That’s repeatedly been a B-1 story. [QUAERITUR…]So for what reason — other than feminist ideology — is this story being buried in the back?

Interesting.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , ,
14 Comments

Catholics… HA! Pathetic!

From Catholic Vote with my emphases:

CATHOLIC CHURCH FAILS TO BEHEAD A SINGLE PERSON IN 2014

For the most intolerant and extreme religion in the world, this is a rather embarrassing statistic.

It appears that the Catholic Church, widely recognized as the most uncompromising and dogmatic among the world’s major religions, is about to close out the year without executing a single person. [Pretty feeble, I’d say.]

As everyone knows, the Catholic Church is a religion of strict doctrine, ruling every aspect of each individual Catholic’s life from the Vatican with an iron fist, while at the same time relentlessly imposing its beliefs on the rest of society.

Yet for some reason the Catholic Church has had an abysmal year at the chopping block, failing to kill a single one of its billion-plus members for failing to live in strict adherence to her teachings.  [!] On top of that, the Vatican has put to death exactly zero people from other religions for refusing to convert to Catholicism.

Even some followers of Islam, universally known as a religion of peace and tolerance, have found time on the weekends to behead a few non-believers.  And yet the Catholic Church, far from resembling anything having to do with peace or tolerance, has taken incompetence to a whole new level when it comes to imposing its beliefs.

Sure, 2015 is a new year and all, but let’s face it.  When it comes to intolerance, we’re pathetic.

I guess we had better revive the auto-da-fé and do some catching up.

Posted in The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

Beautiful Requiem Altar Cards from SPORCH

The nice lady of SPORCH sent me a new set of Extraordinary Form altar cards for Requiem Masses!

They are spectacular.  Your TLM community needs a set!

They are pretty big. Here they are on the edge of a large table.

IMG_4328.JPG

The center card.

IMG_4329.JPG

A detail.

IMG_4330.JPG

You can tell that this set is for a Requiem from this card. What is the clue?

IMG_4331.JPGI have written before about SPORCH.  HERE Check out the site and look at the wonderful options.  Just today I lent a set of the travel cards to a priest friend who is going on vacation soon.

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , ,
4 Comments

1 Jan: Mass for Benefactors

Tomorrow I will celebrate my Holy Mass for the intention of all those who have been benefactors during the year, people who have sent donations and anything from my wishlists. I am very grateful to all of you.

In a particular way, I will remember at the Memento of the Dead, any who have passed away during the year.

You have been very good to me. Your positive notes have also been a real boost.

That said, here is something fun. One of you, also a monthly donor, sent a photo of some Z-Swag in the wild!

This is a good use for the thermal travel mug!

14_12_31_swag

Cheers!

UPDATE:

A few more donations have crept in.  Thanks!  You’ll be included, of course. The last time I’ll be able to check is at about 0850 CST (1450 GMT), before Mass begins.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on 1 Jan: Mass for Benefactors

Plenary Indulgences 31 Dec and 1 Jan

Today, the last day of the year, you have an opportunity to obtain a plenary indulgence, under the usual conditions, by taking part in the recitation or singing of the Te Deum in a church or oratory.

Tomorrow, 1 January, you can obtain a plenary indulgence by taking part in the singing or recitation of the Veni Creator Spiritus.

I recommend warmly that you review and excellent post by my friend Fr. Tim Finigan, the parish priest in marvelous Margate, about obtaining indulgences.  HERE

Tomorrow, we will sing the Veni Creator immediately after 9 a.m. Mass.

If there were ever a year in which we needed the help of the Holy Spirit, I sense that this upcoming year is it.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

German bishops pushing hard to overturn the Church’s doctrine

Over at The Spectator, Damian Thompson has a good summary piece. He recaps what happened at the last Synod of Bishop, where controversy over the Kasper proposals about Communion for the divorced and civilly remarried dominated the proceedings. Damian is reacting to a wretched, pandering piece in The Bitter Pill (aka The Tablet) about how a majority of the German bishops are making a full court press in favor of Communion for the divorced/remarried.

The German bishops are calling the Church’s teaching and practice “incomprehensible”. Clearly the comprehend it. They just don’t believe what the Church teaches and they are revolting against it.

The Germans intend to put huge pressure on Pope Francis to make the changes they want, and they wield a lot of clout. As Damian points out, the German Church receives money from taxes to the tune of £4.6 billion a year! The Bishops Conference’s charity, Caritas, “employs 560,000 staff – the country’s second largest employer after Volkswagen”. Damian also points out that Churches in mission countries, such as in Africa, receive a great deal of their financial support from the Germans.

The African bishops, who are far more faithful to Catholic teaching, are not inclined to go along with the revolting ideas of the Germans, but the Germans have the money. If they can bully the African bishops into at least silence, they can probably have their way with the next Synod, with the full complicity of Card. Baldisseri, who runs the Synod.

Be sure to read all of Damian’s good summary. He doesn’t add too much more new information and he makes some points that I made here while the Synod was underway and after. But his summary is useful and timely. HERE

His piece is too long to reproduced with my usual commentary, but here are some samples with my emphases and comments:

Communion for divorced Catholics: the German bishops twisting Pope Francis’s arm

[…]

Just before Christmas, virtually unnoticed by the media, the German Catholic bishops made a plea for the readmission of divorced and remarried Catholics (or Catholics married to divorcees) to Holy Communion.

That it should be the Germans, led by Cardinal Reinhard Marx – Archbishop of Munich, president of the German bishops’ conference and coordinator of the Vatican’s Secretariat for the Economy – is no coincidence. In 1993, the future Cardinals Kasper and Lehmann asked the Vatican to admit couples in irregular marriages to Communion – indeed, to allow these couples to make up their own minds as to whether they should receive the sacrament. Cardinal Ratzinger kicked that proposal, and with it the liberal German Church, into the long grass.

Now Pope Francis has revived the German plan, by inviting Kasper to set the agenda for the first session of the Synod on the Family last October. That ended in disarray (my accounts here and here), leaving everyone confused about what the full Synod, meeting this coming autumn, had the authority to decide. [Answer: NOTHING.  They can decide NOTHING.  However, with complicity of the press, they can give the impression that they are a governing body.  That creates confusion.  Liberals know this, so they are creating expectations so that when the next Synod revs up, the pressure will increase.]

[…]

These vast budgets create a mindset in which German bishops feel entitled to dictate pastoral practice for Third World dioceses whose churches are overflowing but can’t afford to replace a lightbulb. The bishops of these dioceses, who will again encounter the likes of Marx and Kasper in October, are very conservative on the matter of divorce. You might think that is hypocritical, given the prevalence of priests’ mistresses in Africa, to say nothing of polygamy, but such chaos makes bishops in the developing world all the more determined to hold the line. [Polygamy, etc., is irrelevant.  Sinners will always be with us.  We must defend doctrine.] Also, they suspect Kasper et al of subtle racism, seeking to ‘enlighten’ people of darker skin.  [Remember Card. Kasper’s recorded comments about how the African bishops should be able to tell them what to do?]

[…]

Francis’s opinions are mystery – possibly to himself, one Vatican source tells me. Yes, he wants Kasper’s ideas debated. But, although he’s become more liberal with time, he’s still a 78-year-old Argentinian Jesuit who recoils at the notions of women priests and gay marriages, neither of which innovation is entirely unacceptable to the semi-protestant German liberals. [semi?]

[…]

[NB] The danger for the Pope is that the German-led liberals will turn on him if he fails to deliver radical change, much as their predecessors turned on Paul VI when he refused to allow them to abandon the Catholic stances on birth control, married priests or transubstantiation. At which point Francis may wish that he’d made a few friends in conservative and traditionalist circles. [That is my great fear.  The same atmosphere that surrounded the debate about contraception is present, except that today it is far more volatile.  Today we have social media and far great, far more widespread ignorance of anything Catholic in the rank and file.]

Be sure to read Damian’s whole piece.

Posted in Francis, Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
90 Comments