REMINDER: Conference for Priests on Exorcism: 5-8 Feb 2012 in Tulsa, OK

REPOSTING:

For the second year, the Diocese of Tulsa is putting on  a conference for priests… priests, not lay people… on the Rite of Exorcism in the Latin Church, which will include also study of the Extraordinary Form, pre-Conciliar Rite.  The dates are 5-8 February 2012.

Click HERE.

This conference is designed for priests who are currently engaged in the Church’s pastoral care of those afflicted by extraordinary demonic activity, as well as those priests who have been asked to begin this ministry in their diocese, their stable assistants and those clerics who are involved in various levels of deliverance ministry.

Speakers include Dr. Daniel VanSlyke, of Kenrick Seminary, who will present the liturgical development of the Rite in the Latin Church and Fr. Chad Ripperger, an experienced exorcist, who will offer an analytical study of the Latin text of the 1962 Rite for those exorcists whose primary liturgical language is English. Fr. Carlos Martins, C.C., will lead a panel/participant discussion on offering pastoral care to those who have been liberated through the Church’s saving ministry.

The first presentation will be on Sunday evening, February 5 and the conference will close on Wednesday afternoon, February 8 with the panel discussion. The Registration fee of $175 includes lunch all three days, dinner on Sunday and Monday with a banquet on Tuesday evening. Special room rates are available for this conference from the Hilton Garden Inn, Tulsa South, 8202 South 100th East Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74133 – (918) 392-2000.

I think this would be a good conference.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
1 Comment

QUAERITUR: A saint’s qualification for the title “Virgin”

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, virgins and martyrsFrom a reader:

Praised be Jesus Christ!  I was recently told (by someone who heard from someone else) that in order to bear the title “Virgin”, a Saint would not only have been kept from all physical sins of impurity during their life, but are also thought/known/revealed to have been entirely free of mortal sin throughout their life. Is this true? Would you point me to a record of the actual criteria used for discerning if one is to be called “Virgin” in the Church?

It is not true that such a woman would have to be “entirely free of mortal sin throughout their life”.  There is only one woman ever who ever fit that description.

This isn’t as difficult as your friend is making it.

To be given the title “virgin” the woman had to be physically a virgin.  Full stop.

An exception is made in the case of women who lost physically virginity against their will.

This is also the criterion for the modern Consecration of a Virgin, which some women who live in the the world receive from a bishop.  Some women religious, such as Benedictines, also receive that Consecration.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
42 Comments

QUAERITUR: conferring baptism using another person’s hand

baptism shellA few people asked me today via email about the validity of a baptism wherein someone used the hand of a dead person to pour the water, someone moving the hand.

A rare scenario, of course, and one that is surely super-charged with deep emotions before which we should maintain respectful distance.

However, as to the validity of such a baptism, provide that water was used, and that it touched the head while the proper words, the proper form of the sacrament was pronounced, there is no question that such a baptism would be valid.

Think about it this way.  When baptizing, priests often use the “shell” to pour water.  The instrument or means of making the water arrive on the head is not a determining fact in the validity of the sacrament.  A priest can use his own hand, a shell, some other instrument to pour… whatever.

That said, if this or any other baptism were performed quickly and without the other ceremonies, I would recommend that a more formal rite take place to supply the ceremonies that were lacking at the time.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
20 Comments

The Feeder Feed: New Visitor and Dog Edition

twitterThere was a great sun dog which I was able recently to enjoy.

Today I saw a lone Common Redpoll!  They haven’t been around for a couple years.

It is nice to see a new visitor from time to time.

You can help feed them.  They eat (here at least) from your donations.



Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged , , , ,
7 Comments

Benedict XVI’s sermon for Epiphany and consecration of bishops

“Let yourselves be touched by God’s unrest, so that God’s longing for man may be fulfilled.”

The Holy Father’s sermon for Epiphany and consecration of bishops.  My emphases and comments:

Dear Brothers and Sisters!

The Epiphany is a feast of light. “Arise, shine; for your light has come, and the glory of the Lord has risen upon you” (Is 60:1). With these words of the prophet Isaiah, the Church describes the content of the feast. [“The content of the feast”… a nice way to think about it.  Light.  Indeed… Light from Light.] He who is the true light, and by whom we too are made to be light, has indeed come into the world. He gives us the power to become children of God (cf. Jn 1:9,12). The journey of the wise men from the East [stella duce] is, for the liturgy, just the beginning of a great procession that continues throughout history. [Classic Ratzinger.  The wise and simple of the world must still journey continuously so that they can adore the Lord.] With the Magi, humanity’s pilgrimage to Jesus Christ begins – to the God who was born in a stable, who died on the Cross and who, having risen from the dead, remains with us always, until the consummation of the world (cf. Mt 28:20). The Church reads this account from Matthew’s Gospel alongside the vision of the prophet Isaiah that we heard in the first reading: the journey of these men is just the beginning. Before them came the shepherds – simple souls, who dwelt closer to the God who became a child, and could more easily “go over” to him (Lk 2:15) and recognize him as Lord. But now the wise of this world are also coming. Great and small, kings and slaves, men of all cultures and all peoples are coming. The men from the East are the first, followed by many more throughout the centuries. After the great vision of Isaiah, the reading from the Letter to the Ephesians expresses the same idea in rather sober and simple terms: the Gentiles share the same heritage (cf. Eph 3:6). Psalm 2 puts it like this: “I shall bequeath you the nations, put the ends of the earth in your possession” (v. 8).

The wise men from the East lead the way. They open up the path of the Gentiles to Christ. During this holy Mass, I will ordain two priests to the episcopate, I will consecrate them as shepherds of God’s people. According to the words of Jesus, part of a shepherd’s task is to go ahead of the flock (cf. Jn 10:4). [procedere] So, allowing for all the differences in vocation and mission, we may well look to these figures, the first Gentiles to find the pathway to Christ, for indications concerning the task of bishops. What kind of people were they? The experts tell us that they belonged to the great astronomical tradition that had developed in Mesopotamia over the centuries and continued to flourish. But this information of itself is not enough. No doubt there were many astronomers in ancient Babylon, but only these few set off to follow the star that they recognized as the star of the promise, pointing them along the path towards the true King and Saviour. They were, as we might say, men of science, but not simply in the sense that they were searching for a wide range of knowledge: they wanted something more. [This is the scientia et sapientia discussion.] They wanted to understand what being human is all about. [Nisi credideritis non intelligetis.] They had doubtless heard of the prophecy of the Gentile prophet Balaam: “A star shall come forth out of Jacob and a sceptre shall rise out of Israel” (Num 24:17). They explored this promise. They were men with restless hearts, not satisfied with the superficial and the ordinary. They were men in search of the promise, in search of God. And they were watchful men, capable of reading God’s signs, his soft and penetrating language. [Ah. The apophatic.] But they were also courageous, yet humble: we can imagine them having to endure a certain amount of mockery for setting off to find the King of the Jews, at the cost of so much effort. [And so too anyone seeking the Lord today.] For them it mattered little what this or that person, what even influential and clever people thought and said about them. For them it was a question of truth itself, not human opinion. Hence they took upon themselves the sacrifices and the effort of a long and uncertain journey. Their humble courage was what enabled them to bend down before the child of poor people and to recognize in him the promised King, the one they had set out, on both their outward and their inward journey, to seek and to know. [So, he is also describing the life of bishops.]

Dear friends, how can we fail to recognize in all this certain essential elements of episcopal ministry? [See?] The bishop too must be a man of restless heart, [Cf. Augustine, Confessions.] not satisfied with the ordinary things of this world, but inwardly driven by his heart’s unrest to draw ever closer to God, to seek his face, to recognize him more and more, to be able to love him more and more. [Augustine, as a man of his time, understood that a things weight came from the things desire or need to go to the place it belongs, rather than a force working on it from outside.  Therefore, the heart is drawn from its own need toward God and it will be restless until it reaches its point of rest.  Augustine says “Amor meus pondus meum… My love is my weight.”] The bishop too must be a man of watchful heart, who recognizes the gentle language of God and understands how to distinguish truth from mere appearance. The bishop too must be filled with the courage of humility, [A great paring, that.] not asking what prevailing opinion says about him, but [like the Magi] following the criterion of God’s truth and taking his stand accordingly – opportune – importune. [2 Timothy 4.  This is a phrase often repeated in the celebration of Holy Mass with the Extraordinary Form during weekdays.] He must be able to go ahead and mark out the path. He must go ahead, in the footsteps of him who went ahead of us all because he is the true shepherd, the true star of the promise: Jesus Christ. And he must have the humility to bend down before the God who made himself so tangible and so simple that he contradicts our foolish pride in its reluctance to see God so close and so small. He must devote his life to adoration of the incarnate Son of God, which constantly points him towards the path.

The liturgy of episcopal ordination interprets the essential features of this ministry in eight questions addressed to the candidates, each beginning with the word “Vultis? – Do you want?” These questions direct the will and mark out the path to be followed. Here I shall briefly cite just a few of the most important words of this presentation, where we find explicit mention of the elements we have just considered in connection with the wise men of today’s feast. The bishops’ task is praedicare Evangelium Christi, it is custodire et dirigere, it is pauperibus se misericordes praebere, it is indesinenter orare. Preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ, going ahead and leading, guarding the sacred heritage of our faith, showing mercy and charity to the needy and the poor, thus mirroring God’s merciful love for us, and finally, praying without ceasing: these are the fundamental features of the episcopal ministry. Praying without ceasing means: never losing contact with God, letting ourselves be constantly touched by him in the depths of our hearts and, in this way, being penetrated by his light. Only someone who actually knows God can lead others to God. Only someone who leads people to God leads them along the path of life.

The restless heart of which we spoke earlier, echoing Saint Augustine, is the heart that is ultimately satisfied with nothing less than God, and in this way becomes a loving heart. Our heart is restless for God and remains so, even if every effort is made today, by means of most effective anaesthetizing methods, to deliver people from this unrest. [Anaestitizing!  When we are distracted by myriad signs, for example, we cannot encounter the mystery which transforms (or light that penetrates or God who speaks softly).] But not only are we restless for God: God’s heart is restless for us. [Metaphorically, of course.] God is waiting for us. He is looking for us. He knows no rest either, until he finds us. God’s heart is restless, and that is why he set out on the path towards us – to Bethlehem, to Calvary, from Jerusalem to Galilee and on to the very ends of the earth. [And the father went down the road to meet his prodigal son.] God is restless for us, he looks out for people willing to “catch” his unrest, his passion for us, people who carry within them the searching of their own hearts and at the same time open themselves to be touched by God’s search for us. Dear friends, this was the task of the Apostles: to receive God’s unrest for man and then to bring God himself to man. And this is your task as successors of the Apostles: let yourselves be touched by God’s unrest, so that God’s longing for man may be fulfilled.

The wise men followed the star. Through the language of creation, they discovered the God of history. To be sure – the language of creation alone is not enough. [Scientia et sapientia… reason and faith…  intellect and authority…] Only God’s word, which we encounter in sacred Scripture, was able to mark out their path definitively. Creation and Scripture, reason and faith, [There it is!] must come together, so as to lead us forward to the living God. There has been much discussion over what kind of star it was that the wise men were following. Some suggest a planetary constellation, or a supernova, [NB…] that is to say one of those stars that is initially quite weak, in which an inner explosion releases a brilliant light [There is that contrast again of weak and strong.] for a certain time, or a comet, etc. This debate we may leave to the experts. The great star, [Remember the Exsultet.] the true supernova that leads us on, is Christ himself. He is as it were the explosion of God’s love, which causes the great white light of his heart to shine upon the world. [Sacred Heart as supernova.] And we may add: the wise men from the East, who feature in today’s Gospel, like all the saints, have themselves gradually become constellations of God that mark out the path. In all these people, being touched by God’s word has, as it were, released an explosion of light, through which God’s radiance shines upon our world and shows us the path. The saints are stars of God, by whom we let ourselves be led to him for whom our whole being longs. [Augustine remarks that saints are perhaps better models for us than Christ Himself is. Christ is perfect and His model is impossible.  Saints are closer to the possible for us.] Dear friends: you followed the star Jesus Christ when you said “yes” to the priesthood and to the episcopacy. And no doubt smaller stars have enlightened and helped you not to lose your way. In the litany of saints we call upon all these stars of God, that they may continue to shine upon you and show you the path. As you are ordained bishops, you too are called to be stars of God for men, leading them along the path towards the true light, towards Christ. So let us pray to all the saints at this hour, asking them that you may always live up to this mission you have received, to show God’s light to mankind.


Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

News and urgent request: Pray for Archbp. Brown!

REPOSTED:

I have a warm request and two new items.

This is from VIS, and it has two points of great interest. My emphases and comments.

PAPAL MASSES FOR EPIPHANY AND FEAST OF THE LORD’S BAPTISM

VATICAN CITY, 5 JAN 2012 (VIS) – At 9.30 a.m. tomorrow, Solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, Benedict XVI will preside at Mass in the Vatican Basilica. During the ceremony he will confer episcopal ordination [I still say “consecration”] upon archbishops-elect Msgr. Charles John Brown, apostolic nuncio to Ireland, [See my request below.] and Msgr. Marek Solczynski, apostolic nuncio to Georgia and Armenia. Following Mass the Pope will pray the Angelus from the window of his study in the Vatican Apostolic Palace.

On Sunday 8 January, Feast of the Baptism of the Lord, Benedict XVI will celebrate Mass in the Sistine Chapel and administer the Sacrament of Baptism to a number of children. At midday he will pray the Angelus with faithful gathered in St. Peter’s Square. [Usually celebrated ad orientem.  Tune in.  It is always beautiful.]

Please, dear readers, will you pray for my friend Msgr. Brown?

Perhaps you could stop what you are doing and say a Memorare for him and a Prayer to St. Michael? Perhaps you could ask Our Lady of Knock to strengthen him? Maybe you could offer a Communion and your daily Rosary? You priests and bishops reading this could remember him during Mass at the Memento of the Living.  I will say Mass for his intention.

It is a heavy enough burden being consecrated bishop in this difficult age, but to be nuncio in Ireland… think about it.

Remember, O Most Gracious Virgin Mary,
that never was it known that anyone who fled to Thy protection,
implored Thy help or sought Thine intercession,
was left unaided.
Inspired by this confidence,
I fly unto Thee, O Virgin of Virgins, my Mother;
to Thee do I come, before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful.
O Mother of the Word Incarnate,
despise not my petitions,
but in Thy mercy, hear and answer me.
Amen.

(I say that prayer after every Mass for a short list of bishops I know.)

Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle, be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil; may God rebuke him, we humbly pray and do thou, O Prince of the heavenly host, by the power of God, thrust into hell Satan and all evil spirits who wander through the world for the ruin of souls. Amen.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

The Extra Beatitude and the College of Cardinals

I have been contemplating the buzz about the Consistory, which will more than like be announced today (6 Jan, Epiphany).

My admiration for Pope Benedict is pretty obvious, I should think.

That said, when I think about composition of the College, that extra Beatitude which didn’t make it into the Gospel pops into my mind.

Beati qui non expectant, quia non disappointabuntur.”

o{];¬)

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , , , , , ,
13 Comments

QUAERITUR: Does wine in a cruet left on the altar also get consecrated?

From a reader:

During week day Masses the priest at our parish sometimes has no
server. In this circumstance he obviously has to go to the credence
table himself to get the gifts. After pouring the water and wine into
the Chalice he leaves both cruets on the Altar during the Eucharistic
Prayer. So is the wine transubstantiated into the Blood of Christ? The
wine is used at other Masses later int he week, hence my concerned.

No. The wine in the cruet on the altar is not consecrated simply because it left is on the altar.

The priest would have to intend the consecrate it, which is unlikely, since he doesn’t pour it into the chalice.

The rule of thumb is that the priest intends to consecrate the wine with water in the chalice and the hosts which are placed within the confines of the corporal spread out on the altar.

Which brings me to something which seems to be a growing problem.

As our liturgical world crumbled over the last few decades, many good-hearted people willing to take care of altar linens are confused about how to iron a corporal.

I recommend a booklet by Angelus Press on this topic.  Click HERE.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
19 Comments

Ann Coulter’s nonsensical remarks about Santorum the Catholic

It is possible to enjoy a person’s writing style and the sound of the gears whirring in the brain even while disagreeing with what you are reading.  People forget to remember that fairly often.

Thus, today I take strong exception to a writer I enjoy, Ann Coulter.

Ann staged a little nutty about Catholic Sen. Santorum HERE.

[…]

Santorum is not as conservative as his social-issues credentials suggest. He is more of a Catholic than a conservative, [?] which means he’s good on 60 percent of the issues, but bad on others, such as big government social programs. He’d be Ted Kennedy if he didn’t believe in God. [Inapt and inept.  I think the only thing Santorum and Kennedy had in common is that they were baptized.]

Santorum may not be a big spender as far as professional politicians go, but he is still a professional politician. In 2005, one of his former aides described him as “a Catholic missionary who happens to be in the Senate.” [She seems to be accepting that last description.  Therefore Santorum is in Coulter’s mind he is, at the same time, a “pro pol” but also a “Catholic missionary who happens to be in the Senate”.  Perhaps she wrote that paragraph under the influence of sleep deprivation.]

The Catholic missionary was fantastic on issues like partial-birth abortion, [And yet he is supposed to be like Ted Kennedy, right?] but more like a Catholic bishop in his support for No Child Left Behind, the Medicare drug entitlement program (now costing taxpayers more than $60 billion a year), and a highway bill with a Christmas tree of earmarks, including the famous “bridge to nowhere.”

Santorum cites his father’s admonition to put any extra money in the poor box at church to explain his wanting to use the federal government to help the poor. [So… no aid for the poor? None?]

You get only one or two big issues in a presidential campaign. But in the middle of the second Great Depression, [We are nowhere near the suffering that implied.  Yet.] Santorum is on the campaign trail saying, “The reason I ran is ’cause I think people know there is more than just a little narrow issue called ‘jobs.'”

Actually, this year, it’s pretty much just jobs.

[…]

I think we can and must talk about more than one issue at a time, even in the campaign season.

The bottom line is that – insofar as this piece is concerned – she implies that if someone is Catholic she can’t be conservative.  Did you get that impression as well?

In any event, it is possible to enjoy a person’s writing style and even while disagreeing with what you are reading.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , ,
80 Comments

More canonical stuff on Archd. Detroit v Voris (Real Catholic TV)

The Canonical Defender, Prof Ed Peters, has more to say about Archd. Detroit v. Voris (and “Catholic”).

He gets into a question I raised HERE.

He doesn’t have a combox.  Do visit his blog and spike his stats.

A few more things to keep in mind about the AOD and Voris/RCTV
by Dr. Edward Peters

Further to my first posting on this matter, and with the same provisos, I offer a few words on two aspects of the Voris/RCTV situation generating many questions. [Including my own.]

A) The AOD, some claim, does not have jurisdiction over Voris/RCTV.

1. Jurisdiction is a quintessentially canonical issue (!), but I have yet to see the “lack of jurisdiction” claim being made by anyone who knows how canon law actually determines jurisdiction over persons and projects. As a blog is not the place for me to attempt a pre-emptive tutorial on canonical jurisdiction, I’ll just say that, to the extent that jurisdiction is or might be an issue in this matter, I believe the AOD to be on firm ground.

2. I can add, though, that the “lack of jurisdiction” claim implies that the AOD needed “jurisdiction” to state that it “does not regard [Voris/RCTV] as being authorized to use the word ‘Catholic’ to identify or promote their public activities (Dec 2011)” or that “the catechetical presentations and the interpretations of Catholic teachings or positions presented by St. Michael’s Media and/or RealCatholicTV—be they audio, video, or exclusively Web-based—cannot be approved or endorsed by the archdiocese at this time (Oct 2008).”

Since when, I ask, does the AOD need “jurisdiction” to reply to inquiries made to it by third-parties regarding Voris/RCTV or to anticipate the need to respond to more such inquiries in the future? Are the pervasive claims by Voris/RCTV that they are producing “Real Catholic TV”, and running a “Catholic Investigative Agency”, and publishing the “Catholic Critic”, etc., immune from any reply by the ecclesiastical institution headquartered just a few miles from the Voris/RCTV facilities and directly responsible for the identity and mission of the Catholic Church in this region?

B) What about every other use of the word ‘Catholic’ out there?

The question rests on a multitude of scenarios, of course, and I can’t address them all, but here are a few preliminary points.

1. Like her Founder, the Catholic Church has precious few “tools” with which to carry on her mission, but among those tools is her very name, Catholic. True, Catholics in every land and in every age have misused the name “Catholic”—not always with evil intentions, of course, yet often enough with bad (sometimes, very bad) consequences for the Church. But, notwithstanding the frequency of such misappropriations of her name, the Catholic Church has the right to take whatever steps she can to protect her name from being appropriated by those who think they have the authority to wrap themselves up in it.

2. The canon law regarding use of the word “Catholic” binds Catholics regardless of the degree of protection accorded, or not, the word “Catholic” under civil law. The alternative view effectively holds that the Church may enforce only those canons that the State lets her enforce. Perish that thought.

3. The canon law on use of the word “Catholic” and on certain types of public activities carried on by Catholics is considerably broader and more complex than any descriptions I have yet seen accorded it in the blogosphere. Folks who look up a canon or two and purport to explain their meaning risk doing a disservice to both the law and the community that law is meant to serve.

4. People are basically correct, I think, to note that ecclesiastical efforts to protect the word “Catholic” have been deficient over the last several decades. They are incorrect to hold that nothing (or practically nothing) was done to protect the word “Catholic” during those years, and I invite them to do some basic research to see for themselves. And they are certainly wrong to imply that the regrettable failures of the past to protect the name “Catholic” from misappropriation effectively bars Church leadership today from acting to protect that name (as if the solution to the ills of past disregard for law were—of all things—continued disregard for law!)

5. An archdiocese, like any governing/serving organization, has limited resources (financial, personnel, etc.) with which to respond to a virtually unlimited number of situations, opportunities, and problems. The priority accorded any specific matter is, therefore, always a function of the prominence of the issue (itself to be assessed in different ways), the clarity of the potential resolution(s), the present availability of resources to address the issue, and so on. Assuming that the AOD is acting within its authority—and it is—those who assert that it should deal with X, Y, and Z before saying anything about Voris/RCTV are entitled to their opinion, of course, but, in the end, they can only be saying that the AOD’s list of priorities is not identical to theirs.I must repeat, this matter turns essentially on canon law, and will finally be decided not by webmasters or combox jockeys, [!] but by ecclesiastical officials acting in accord with the substantive and procedural provisions of canon law, provisions to which all parties in this matter have rightful access.

In the meantime, I hope that these posts will help defuse some of the more distracting chatter floating around out there.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Linking Back, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , , ,
54 Comments