Norma Jean Coon: reconciled

Norma Jean Coon, who had been involved with some wymyn who think they can be pryssssts, Norma Jean Coon, who renounced her involvement with the same women, abjured her pretend ordination as a deacon, and sought reconciliation.

She has an update on her site.

March 25, 2011

Holy God, I ask your blessings on my Bishop and my pastor and priests in Rome who have assisted me in the process of being re-instated into the Roman Catholic Church and I forsake all connection with the Roman Catholic Women Priests program via Internet or otherwise.

I thank you for the efforts of my family in my behalf and ask for Jesus’ Light and Love to pour over my husband of 47 years and my five children.

Forgive me my Beloved Jesus and Mother Mary for pursuing my own will in this matter of ordination and as I consecrate myself to your Divine Will through the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I ask you to pour out Light and Love upon any who have placed themselves outside of your Love and Light Bless us, O Lord, for these thy gifts and place us in the Heart of the Father, as we pray for more priests to serve in our church and for vocations to enrich our Church in the United States.

Forgive us for failing in obedience and enrich us in your Holy Love, I pray through Jesus and Mary. Fiat+

WDTPRS KUDOS to Norma Jean Coon.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, Linking Back | Tagged ,
10 Comments

QUAERITUR: Vesting priests for Vespers

From a priest reader:

At my parish we celebrate solemn sung Vespers during Lent with the congregation. The pastor has asked that the priest celebrant vest in alb and stole using at the basis of his request that the Holy Father uses an alb and stole and likewise the Ceremonial of Bishops prescribes that the Bishop use and alb and stole. Saying that the bishop is properly the celebrant and that what is good for Rome and the bishop is good for the parish as well.

However, in our discussions we have looked in the various rituals for Baptism, Marriage and even exposition of the Blessed Sacrament and found that there is given the option for a priest to wear a surplice (assuming then that the cassock is used). Would you be able to point us in the right direction as to where both are valid options? I’d appreciate any direction you can shoot my way.

Kudos for having Vespers!  A fine tradition.

My understanding is that, for a priest or deacon, the proper dress for Vespers is choir dress with cope.  Cassock, surplice, biretta surmounted by cope, biretta when seated and in procession.   Stole if the Blessed Sacrament is to be exposed, and then one would not wear the biretta when seated.

I am not sure that the Pope’s dress for Vespers is the best model in this case.  It seems that these days the Pope is dressing only as any bishop would.  I am not sure that just because a bishop dresses in a certain way, priests should therefore dress that way.  Also, back in the day, the Pope would usually be present for Vespers but not the celebrant.  And the Pope’s “choir” dress is particular to the Pope.

People more knowledgeable than I can chime in on this.

That said, for priests I believe the usual vesture for Vespers is cassock, surplice, cope with biretta when appropriate.  Let not the overused alb eliminate what priests have always worn.  A sad thing when some late-innovation drives the normal into the category of optional.

Furthermore, this is a situation in which the Extraordinary (traditional) way of doing things can exert its gravitational pull on the Ordinary, and therefore enhance a sense of continuity with our way of praying for a very long time.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick | Tagged ,
11 Comments

Bp. Morlino affirms prohibition of eulogies. As night follows day, liberals whine.

We have written about H.E. Most Rev. Robert Morlino, Bishop of Madison on several occasions.  Bp. Morlino is one of the true stand-up men in the USCCB.

Now comes this from Channel 3000 which seems to have something to do with CNN.

My emphases and comments.

Some Catholics Upset Over Bishop’s Mandate Ending Eulogies
Bishop Says Eulogies Shouldn’t Be Made During Funeral Mass  [You can see from the beginning that the writer/publication/site aims at making Bp. Morlino into the bad guy.  Will they in fairness go beyond this and say that Bp. Morlino did not just make this up?  The Church’s liturgical law, which the bishop cannot change or disobey or ignore, says that eulogies at funerals are not permitted.  Right? Yes?  No?]

MADISON, Wis. — Some in the Catholic Diocese of Madison are upset over a recent mandate ending family remembrances and eulogies at funeral Masses.   [The “recent” mandate was already made in 2000, GIRM 382: “At the Funeral Mass there should, as a rule, be a short homily, but never a eulogy of any kind.”  Is that the law?  Yes? No?]

It happened to Dane County Supervisor Dianne Hesselbein on Monday. [Soooo… she is a prominent person in the area and gets access to the CNN outlet.  I am prompted to wonder, given that she is an elected official in one of the most liberal counties in the USA, and a Catholic, what her positions are on matters about which the Church has clear teachings.] She spent hours over the weekend to come up with a few short words to remember her father.

“It was about my dad — this was about my kids’ grandfather,” Hesselbein said.  [And?  The Church’s law does not say “No eulogy unless it is about your kids’ grandfather.”]

And she said she couldn’t believe her ears when she was told just minutes before her father’s funeral on Monday that she would not be allowed to speak. [First, it may be that violation of the Church’s law for years in this area has given people the false notion that they can give eulogies.  It may be that it could have been made clearer in the pre-funeral arrangements.  Thus, correction seems new, harsh, capricious, especially to those who think the Church’s laws mean nothing.  But this has been exacerbated by the antinomian self-centeredness of priests (and former bishops?) who thought they could do as they please with the Church’s worship and, therefore, to God’s people.]

“This is a tribute to my father that we all agreed that I would be the only one to speak on,” Hesselbein said. [Who is “we”?  Her close relatives?  I suspect “we” didn’t include the pastor of the parish.] “And they said I couldn’t do it, because the bishop made this recent decision.” [“They” must be the priest and bishop.]

That decision came from Madison Bishop Robert Morlino last month. [No.  The decision came from Rome long ago. ] By phone, he told WISC-TV these “family remembrances” during a funeral Mass are a major distraction from what the Mass should be about.  [Think of the innumerable absurdities burbled in churches during these illicit and ill-advised eulogies.  Horror stories could abound, but they won’t here.]

In a letter to diocese churches, the bishop said, “I am asking that such words of remembrance not be spoken at any time during the funeral liturgy in the Diocese of Madison.”

He goes on to say family would have the opportunity to share words of remembrance “In some other setting outside of the sacred liturgy, such as during the visitation … at the cemetery … or at the funeral banquet.”

“I don’t want to be kind of piling up too many other concerns at the Mass,” Morlino told WISC-TV. [That’s because a funeral Mass is primarily for praying for the deceased, asking God’s mercy.  It is not for telling off-color stories or tales of getting drunk together or watching some poor person burst into tears.]

In fact, Morlino said such remembrances — or eulogies — have never been allowed during Catholic Mass. But he said rules have been bent over the years, so it’s been happening more often than not. [Therein lies a problem.  Correcting an abuse is very hard.]

But for those like Hesselbein who want to remember their loved ones with their words — it’s news that’s hard to take.

There’s a way to have a compromise,” Hesselbein said. “Because I was not granted closure. I was not granted the opportunity to celebrate my dad.”  [Look at that carefully.  Her “compromise” means “Let me do what I want even though we all know it is against the Church’s law.”  Which isn’t a compromise at all.  Note also “celebrate”.  No.  Not at Mass.  That is not what the funeral Mass is for.  Folks, we need a return to black vestments, I’m afraid.  The funeral Mass, as offered in so many places for so long, has been damaging to the faith of the people, I’m afraid.]

Madison’s Call to Action group, an organization that’s been very critical of Morlino’s decisions over the years, said it is outraged over the move. [When are these heretical whiners not outraged about something.  The live to gripe.] The group is encouraging others if they’re not happy with their church, to move to another one. [Don’t let the door hit you.]

Hesselbein said she’s worried if more decisions like this are made, the Catholic Church will lose more members. [This is just a guess: could Ms. Hesselbein be involved with Call to Action?]

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
80 Comments

WDTPRS 3rd Sunday of Lent – We are not in our Lenten discipline alone.

Our prayer, taken from the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary for Saturday of the 4th week of Lent

COLLECT – LATIN TEXT (2002MR):
Deus, omnium misericordiarum et totius bonitatis auctor,
qui peccatorum remedia
in ieiuniis, orationibus et eleemosynis demonstrasti,
hanc humilitatis nostrae confessionem propitius intuere,
ut, qui inclinamur conscientia nostra,
tua semper misericordia sublevemur.

Misericordia means generally “tender-heartedness, pity, compassion, mercy”.  In the plural, as we find it today, it refers to works of mercy. We find both a plural and a singular in today’s prayer and we must make a distinction between them.  Our bulky and bountiful Lewis & Short Dictionary explains that bonitas is the “good quality of a thing” and also various benevolent and virtuous behaviors.  When referring to a parent, bonitas means “parental love, tenderness.”  Demonstro indicates, “to point out” as with the finger, “indicate, designate, show.”  Demonstrasti is a “syncopated” form for demonstravisti, which helps the prayer to flow.  The L&S states that inclino means, “to cause to lean, bend, incline, turn.”  In a more neutral sense it signifies, “to bend, turn, incline, decline, sink.”  By extension it means, “to decline, as in a fever, or sink down in troubles”, but it can also mean, more rarely, “to change, alter from its former condition”.  We are all at sea with this word, so we turn to Souter’s A Glossary of Later Latin and find “to humble”.  This is probably the direction we must go.  Sublevo literally means to lift up from beneath, to raise up, hold up, support. Thus it comes to mean also, to sustain, support, assist, encourage, console” and also, “to lighten, qualify, alleviate, mitigate, lessen an evil, to assuage.”  This word is in the beautiful 10th century Mozarabic Lenten hymn Attende, Domine often sung in parishes around the world even today: “Give heed, O Lord, and be merciful, for we have sinned against you. / To you, O high King, Redeemer of all, / we raise up (sublevamur) our eyes weeping:/ hear, O Christ, the prayers of those bent down begging.”

Confessio is from confiteor (con-fateor – the first word in our expression of sorrow for sins at the beginning of Mass).  This is a complicated word.  First, confessio is obviously “a confession or acknowledgment”.  The Latin Vulgate (Heb 3:1) and St. Gregory the Great (+604 – Ep. 7,5) use it for “a creed, avowal of belief” in the sense of an acknowledgment of Christ.  The most famous use of confessio, however, must be that of St. Augustine of Hippo (+430), whose stupendous autobiographical prayer is now known as Confessiones.  The excellent Augustinus Lexicon now being developed says confessio has three major meanings: profession of faith in God, praise of God, and admission to God of sins.  We can say “testify” or “give witness to.”  Augustine uses the word testimonium twice in the second sentence of his Confessions.  This is not “confession” in the sense of admission of criminal guilt, nor is it merely to a Christian confession of sins.  Rather, it is a way of giving witness to the Christian character we put on in baptism, a witness by how we live to what the Lord has done within us.  Sometimes that response requires humble admission of sins, sometimes it requires humbly giving glory to God.  Sometimes it demands patient fidelity and the practice virtue in the tedium of everyday life.  Sometimes it requires more spectacular deeds, even martyrdom.  It always demands humility.  The best confession we make is in our words and deeds, according to our state in life, in the midst of the circumstances we face each day no matter what they are.

Our Collect reminds us of the remedies for sin identified by Jesus Himself: prayer, fasting (cf. Matthew 9:14), and almsgiving or works of mercy (cf. Matthew 6:1; Luke 12:33).  When Jesus cures the epileptic demoniac, He says that that sort of demon is driven out only by both prayer and fasting (Mark 9:27 Vulgate).  In Acts 10 an angel tells the centurion Cornelius that his prayers and alms have been seen favorably by God (literally, they ascended as a memorial before God in the manner of a sacrifice).   St. Augustine said: “Do you wish your prayer to fly toward God? Make for it two wings: fasting and almsgiving” (En. ps. 42, 8).  In a Lenten Angelus address on 16 February 1997, the Holy Father said:

The Church points out to us a path (of moving from a superficial life to deep interiority, from selfishness to love, of striving to live according to the model of Christ himself, that) … can be summarized in three words: prayer, fasting, almsgiving.  Prayer can have many expressions, personal and communal. But we must above all live its essence, listening to God who speaks to us, conversing with us as children in a “face to face” dialogue filled with trust and love.  In addition to being an external practice, fasting, which consists in the moderation of food and life-style, is a sincere effort to remove from our hearts all that is the result of sin and inclines us to evil.  Almsgiving, far from being reduced to an occasional offering of money, means assuming an attitude of sharing and acceptance. We only need to “open our eyes” to see beside us so many brothers and sisters who are suffering materially and spiritually. Thus Lent is a forceful invitation to solidarity.

This brings us to conscientiaConscientia signifies in the first place, “a knowing of a thing together with another person, joint knowledge, consciousness”.  Note the unity, or solidarity, of knowledge in the prefix con-.  It also means, “conscientiousness” in the sense of knowledge or feelings about a thing.  It also has a moral meaning also as, “a consciousness of right or wrong, the moral sense”.

WDTPRS LITERAL TRANSLATION:
O God, author of all acts of mercy and all goodness,
who in fasts, prayers, and acts of almsgiving indicated the remedies of sins,
look propitiously on this testimony of our humility,
so that we who are being humbled in our conscience
may always be consoled by your mercy.

Remember, words have different meanings, which I why I provide raw vocabulary.  I must point out something that could change this literal translation.  St. Augustine in one of his sermons speaks of the mercy of God.  Using the example of Jesus’ mercy to the woman caught in adultery (John 8), Augustine says – as if Jesus were talking – “Those others were restrained by conscience (conscientia) from punishing, mercy moves (inclinat misericordia) me to help you (ad subveniendum)” (s. 13.5 – 27 May 418 on the feast of St. Cyprian of Carthage).   Even though in the Collect inclino is paired with conscientia rather than misericordia as it is in the sermon, the vocabulary suggests that this sermon may have been a partial source for this ancient Collect.  This could provide a clue as to how to translate it.   So, we can say “we who are being moved by our conscience” or even “we who are being brought low, bent down, humbled by our conscience” or “we who are flagging (as if under a weight) in our conscience” (this is how I translated it for WDTPRS four years ago).   What to do?  When translating we have to make a choice.  This time around I chose “being humbled”.

An examination of our conscience is a humbling experience.  When we look to see who really are inside, we can have different reactions.  Sometimes we find things which frighten and discourage us.  If we are weak in our habits and our faith, that inveterate enemy of ours souls, the Devil who is “father of lies” will rub us raw with our ugliness tempting us to lose hope about the possibility of living a moral life or, in extreme cases, about our salvation.   On a less dramatic plane, falling down in our Lenten resolve on one day can cause a collapse of our will so that we will “flag” and give up.  This is why the Lenten discipline is so important.   By it we learn to govern our appetites, examine our consciences, do penance, and learn the habits which are virtues.  On the other hand, a recognition of sins and failures will “incline” us to call with humble confidence upon the mercy of God who paid the price for our salvation.

As a people united before Christ’s altar of sacrifice, humbled and cast down low, we raise our eyes upwards to the Father who tenderly sees our efforts.   But we can become weary in the midst of our Lenten discipline and the enemy is tirelessly working for our defeat.  Do not forget the military imagery of exercises and discipline we had in previous weeks. In today’s Collect we beg Him to pick us back up, dust us off, and help us stay upright for the rest of the hard Lenten march (sublevemur).

In am reminded of the moment in the film The Passion of the Christ when Christ falls under His horrible burden of the Cross.  His Mother, our Mother, recalling how once He had fallen as a child and she ran to Him to console Him in His unexpected pain, runs to Him to give Him what support she might in His entirely expected suffering.  She ran to Him and then stood with Him.  Mary hurries also to each of us and stays by our side.  We are not in our Lenten discipline alone.  When we are flagging in our efforts, when we are humbled in our failures, our Blessed Mother is our help, together with all the saints and angels of whom she is the glorious Queen.  We too can be help to others, particularly by not causing for them an occasion of temptation to break their resolve.

NEW CORRECTED VERSION:
O God, author of every mercy and of all goodness,
who in fasting, prayer and almsgiving
have shown us a remedy for sin,
look graciously on this confession of our lowliness,
that we, who are bowed down by our conscience,
may always be lifted up by your mercy
.

LAME-ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
Father,
you have taught us to overcome our sins
by prayer, fasting and works of mercy.
When we are discouraged by our weakness,
give us confidence in your love.

You decide.

Posted in WDTPRS |
3 Comments

The Feeder Feed: “Is it spring yet?” edition

Follow Fr. Z on Twitter!The Finches are changing their colors, the Nuthatches and Chickadees aren’t chummy anymore, I have spotted Robins so I know that spring is here.  No really.   It is.  That’s what I keep telling myself.

That’s why there are icicles still hanging on the feeders.

Cold Finches, not Gold Finches.

This fellow is decked out in his spring colors and I am sure the ladies will not be able to resist.   In the last couple weeks the plumage of the males has gotten brighter.  If I am not mistaken House Finches nest pretty early in the year.

Red-breasted Nuthatch.

Regular Nuthatch.  Compare and contrast.

The huge news involves the return of the huge Pileated Woodpecker.  We saw him the other day.  He is coming back to the suet cakes!  I hope he will bring mom and the kids as well.  I may get a couple extra cages and put them far out from the house.

Chickadees are content with less.  But for Chickadees less is more.

It’s more than tuppence a bag!




Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged
5 Comments

QUAERITUR: Different methods of Stations of the Cross, indulgences

From a reader:

I went to a church for Mass and Stations on my way home from work. My home parish uses the stations in the way of St. Alphonsus, but the stations at the church I visited left me with some questions, and perhaps a little confusion. According to the booklet, this Way of the Cross was developed by Pope John Paul II for Good Friday in 1991. Why were so many of the traditional stations omitted? Why did the Holy Father feel the need to add meditations that cover events beyond what is contained in the traditional Way of the Cross?  [You are asking me that? Really? I hope you will have a chance to ask him that question yourself someday. o{]:¬) ] I had no luck trying to learn more in a Google search, but I was wondering if you could explain (or direct me to an explanation) of the development of John Paul’s stations. Also, is it still possible to obtain a plenary or partial indulgence with this version?

A Pope, who ultimately is the one who determines which works can gain indulgences, develops a method of the Stations of the Cross.  It is celebrated publicly on Good Friday so that people participating can gain an indulgence.  Is there a question about whether or not you can gain the usual indulgence for Stations using John Paul II’s method?

A plenary indulgence can be obtained by making the Way of the Cross on Good Friday even through televised participation for the Holy Father’s Stations.

Otherwise, this devotion at other times must be made before Stations of the Way of the Cross legitimately erected.   That means that a bishop or his delegate is to have established them in the place, usually a church or chapel or perhaps cemetery or other outside place such as a retreat house.  The bishop, etc., then provides a document that this was done.  Usually a document like that, often in Latin, can be found hanging on a wall of the sacristy, unless in ignorance it was taken down.

When Stations have been duly erected, they are symbolized or “located” with a Cross on the wall or perhaps outside with a standing structure.  There is often a picture or statue group, etc.   There are 14 Stations.  Movement from one station to the next is required when you do them as an individual.  If the Stations are a public event, then just the person leading them needs to move from station to station.

The Handbook of Indulgences indicates that this is also vocal prayer.  By custom some “preces vocales” are added.  I suppose that might only be “Lord Jesus Crucified, have mercy on us.”  Also, the Handbook says that there is flexibility about the mysteries considered.

It may be that some people are prevented from going to a church or place where there are legitimately erected Stations.  In that case a person can still gain the indulgence by spending at least one half hour meditating on the Cross and death of the Lord.

Eastern Catholics, who don’t have this custom of the Way of the Cross, can also gain an indulgence according as their respective patriarchs determine.

Remember also that there are conditions for gaining any plenary indulgence.  In addition to the work performed you must be free of attachment to sin.  Meditation on the Cross and death of the Lord should help this resolve. Otherwise, you can gain a partial indulgence.

There is no one way by which the Way or Stations of the Cross must be observed.  There are several different methods.  I prefer the traditional order of the Stations, but there are others.  Usually these other methods are arranged according to moments all found in the Gospels, they are scriptural-based.

As a matter of fact, I was going to post about this great little book of different observances of the Stations, an old work reprinted by Angelus Press.

These are all according to the traditional 14 Stations we are most familiar with.

John Paul II’s method in 1991 were arranged as follow:

  • First Station: Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane
  • Second Station: Jesus, Betrayed by Judas, is Arrested
  • Third Station: Jesus is Condemned by the Sanhedrin
  • Fourth Station: Jesus is Denied by Peter
  • Fifth Station: Jesus is Judged by Pilate
  • Sixth Station: Jesus is Scourged and Crowned with Thorns
  • Seventh Station: Jesus Bears the Cross
  • Eighth Station: Jesus is Helped by Simon the Cyrenian to Carry the Cross
  • Ninth Station: Jesus Meets the Women of Jerusalem
  • Tenth Station: Jesus is Crucified
  • Eleventh Station: Jesus Promises His Kingdom to the Good Thief
  • Twelfth Station: Jesus Speaks to His Mother and the Disciple
  • Thirteenth Station: Jesus Dies on the Cross
  • Fourteenth Station: Jesus is Placed in the Tomb

In 2000, for the Jubilee, John Paul’s Stations were the more traditional list.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
10 Comments

Summorum Pontificum, Latin, liberals, TLMs, seminarians, Magic Circles and an Instruction

From Damian Thompson’s blog comes a piece about Latin, seminarians, the Extraordinary Form and liberal enemies of all of the above, with my emphases and comments.  Edited.

[…]

In contrast, the proposal to teach all seminarians to celebrate the Tridentine Mass is a seriously big deal. In many ways it’s as radical as Summorum Pontificum itself.

According to John Allen, bishops around the world “haven’t exactly bent over backwards” to make the Old Mass widely available since 2007. [Damian needed John Allen to tell him that? o{];¬) ] That sounds about right. In England and Wales, most dioceses don’t flagrantly disregard Summorum Pontificum – but they don’t need to. On paper, the self-implementing features of the motu proprio challenge the power of the bishop: a priest doesn’t need permission to celebrate the EF. [An interesting view of the effect.  I have always preferred to think of Summorum Pontificum as a gift to priests, something that actually built up priests for change instead of continuing the incessant stream of enhancments of the power of bishops.] In practice, it’s easy to turn the document into a dead letter, since most parish priests come from a Vatican II generation unsympathetic to traditional rubrics and most lay people have never been near a Tridentine Mass and don’t know what they’re missing[Which is why more parish priests should simply introduce the older form of Mass in parishes, especially so that young people can experience it.]

[…]

The nightmare for diehard opponents of the EF is the formation of a generation of priests who know how to use the 1962 Missal and are perfectly happy to do so in every diocese. [Exactly.]

This is only a guess, but I reckon that half our current seminarians would like to be taught how to say the Old Mass – an unthinkable proportion 30 years ago, when today’s senior clergy were training for the priesthood.  [In the USA I am pretty sure that it is more than half.] However, these students are smart enough to keep their mouths shut. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?] Seminaries are run by the Magic Circle: [For American readers, the “Magic Circle” refers to the the liberal bishops in the UK who have closed ranks.  I think it was also a TV show in England once upon a time.] until recently, rectors had no difficulty picking out the matey-but-deferential liberal students who would be tomorrow’s monsignors; now the supply of liberals has all but dried up, and they face the tougher task of distinguishing moderate conservatives from secret traditionalists.

The last thing they want – absolutely the last thing – is for every seminarian to be trained to celebrate the “Mass of the Ages”. Not only would this make it more difficult to root out undesirable traddies, but it would also eventually carry the ancient liturgy into parishes untouched by Summorum Pontificum. That would be a disaster from the Magic Circle’s point of view. The promotion of the Extraordinary Form even as an occasional alternative in local churches would accelerate a cultural shift towards traditional Catholicism that the hierarchy is already struggling to control. [I would add that once a priest has learned the older form he never says the newer form the same way after.  The older form also teaches priests something about who they are as priests.]

The ramifications of an instruction to seminaries to teach students the Extraordinary Form – and enough Latin to know what they’re saying – are enormous. For that reason, I expect a very big effort to circumvent any such obligation. [The thing is… the 1983 CIC already has the nearly perfectly ignored can. 249.] We can’t be sure that Mickens’s and Allen’s sources are right about the document, of course; but we can be certain that bishops and seminary rectors have heard the same rumours and are working on a contingency plan. If the instruction tries to force the Old Missal into seminaries, then liberal canon lawyers will be crawling all over it the second it appears, looking for loopholes. And if there aren’t any, then expect lots of delaying tactics and excuses involving lack of staff, resources, time etc. [I am available to teach The Extraordinary Form, Latin, the TLM, Patristic Theology, the older form of Mass, etc.]

And all this just as the new [corrected] English [Roman] Missal is coming in. We do live in interesting times.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , ,
38 Comments

Catholic Herald DIGITAL: discount until 30 March – only £10 ($16)

I always look at The Catholic Herald, the UK’s best Catholic weekly. As a matter of of fact, I not only look at it, I now write for it too!  That’s new since last I told you about the discount on the digital version.

The Catholic Herald has a digital web-edition, the whole print edition available online. You see the paper as it appears in the printed version. That means you can also get the content they don’t put on their website.

Moreover, you don’t have to wait for it in the mail.

Furthermore, they send you an email when each new edition is ready.

In addition, there is an iPhone/iPad app for it!

They have a special discount going right now for the online, web-edition. Instead of the usual £38 it is £10 … a “tenner” (approx. $16.24 as I write). This is valid until March 30, 2011.Then it goes up to £12. Still, good, but not as good.

Direct link to Catholic Herald Digital (the e-paper)

Here is what you do:

  1. Add to basket
  2. Enter CHPROMO in to the ‘promotional field’
  3. Press ‘Go’
  4. Shopping cart calculates and shows the discount from £38 to £10
  5. ‘Proceed to Checkout’
  6. Pay
  7. User gets username and password by email.

ADVANTAGES FOR YOU.

  • The online version is posted up on a Friday – around lunchtime (in England, of course) – in line with the publishing date
  • Multi-user licensing is available eg. a theological college that will have several concurrent users (they need to contact the Catholic Herald by email)
  • Access to all the way back to 2003 archives
  • Quick word searching throughout the archives
  • Cut and paste feature
  • Auto screen width feature on the control panel
  • Quick email and web links from the paper


Enjoy it while drinking Mystic Monk Coffee which you can get through your monthly subscription!

Good combination, no?

Another advantage: You have every edition of the Catholic Herald archived online: less clutter!

England is a few years ahead of the US in the culture wars. Catholics there have a tougher row to hoe in the public square… or should I say ‘common’?  Americans can get some insights into what is around the corner.

Support a good Catholic weekly and get a great publication.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
4 Comments

Should you ever advise someone not to become a Catholic?

From the UK’s best Catholic weekly, the Catholic Herald, comes this… with a quote from one of WDTPRS’s favorites… sorry, favourites, His Hermeneuticalness.

Archbishop Antonio Mennini, Apostolic Nuncio to Britain, says in an interview with the Herald this week that he used to advise an Orthodox seminarian “not to become a Catholic”. The archbishop, who was nuncio to Russia for eight years, said:

I would tell him quite often: “You must not become a Catholic. You have to keep your faith in order to better serve your Church. Now you know us you can dream about going to Rome. You can go to Rome one day in order to study but you should remain a Russian Orthodox.”

The blogger Fr Tim Finigan says he finds the comment “disconcerting”: “Surely we can never say to someone that they must not become a Catholic?” he suggests.

Archbishop Mennini was, perhaps, in an exceptional situation: as nuncio to Russia, he was working very delicately to repair relations between the Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox.

But what about in more ordinary situations? A surprising example comes from the life of St Josemaría Escrivá, founder of Opus Dei. A Jewish girl told him she wanted to become Catholic but that her parents were against it. He advised her not to make “any gestures of rebellion”: “You will be a good daughter of Christ,” he said, “if you are a good daughter of your parents.”

So, are there ever good reasons not to become Catholic? Or should people always be encouraged to convert?

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity |
51 Comments

What will the art in the CTS Roman Missal be like?

On the site of the Catholic Truth Society, UK publisher of the new Roman Missal with the new, corrected ICEL translation, there are some images of … images in the new book.

A sample.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool |
13 Comments