On the site of the Catholic Truth Society, UK publisher of the new Roman Missal with the new, corrected ICEL translation, there are some images of … images in the new book.
A sample.
On the site of the Catholic Truth Society, UK publisher of the new Roman Missal with the new, corrected ICEL translation, there are some images of … images in the new book.
A sample.
I am delighted to relate to the readership that there is now a Confraternity of Catholic Clergy in the UK. The British Province of St. Pope Gregory the Great.
I am sure they chose Gregory the Great (+604) because he sent missionaries to England.
From their desire to continue the good work begun during Pope Benedict’s state visit, to continue that “Benedict Bounce”, the brethren have ganged up.
The Confraternity aims to promote fidelity, formation and fraternity among priests.
You will be able to donate to their effort through PayPal. When they active their link it would be good for you to drop a tenner in their collection basket to give them a little seed money for their future projects. If 100 readers would do that, I am sure they would be grateful.
Please stop and say a prayer to St. Gregory for their project.
I’ll let you know when you can send that tenner.
In the older, pre-conciliar Missal, today’s Collect was used on Wednesday of the 2nd Week of Lent as an Oratio super populum or “Prayer over the people” which followed the Post Communions of the Mass. As such, take note that the priest in praying does not refer to “us” and “we” as he does in normal Collects. He prayers for the people on their behalf. This lends a different impact to today’s prayer.
COLLECT (2002MR):
Deus, innocentiae restitutor et amator,
dirige ad te tuorum corda servorum,
ut, Spiritus tui fervore concepto,
et in fide inveniantur stabiles,
et in opere efficaces.
The prayer has ancient roots in the Gelasian Sacramentary for the 7th day in the Octave of Easter though the prayer was somewhat different (Deus, innocentiae restitutor et amator, dirige ad te tuorum corda famulorum, ut quos de infidelitatis tenebris liberasti, numquam a tuae veritatis luce discedant). The second half of today’s prayer comes from another prayer in the Gelasian, from vespers in the Octave of Pentecost (Deus, qui discipulis tuis spiritum sanctum paraclytum in ingis fervore tui amoris mittere dignatus es, da populis tuis in unitate fidei esse ferventes, ut in tua semper dilectione permanentes et in fide inveniantur stabilies et in opere efficaces).
Now you know the rest of the story…. as your eyeballs roll up into your head, drool trickles onto the keyboard… your head lolls back and snaps forward again.
“Fervor”, in English, is a a bit weak in conveying the impact of Latin fervor, “a boiling or raging heat, a violent heat, a raging, boiling, fermenting”. It stands for “ardor, passion”.
We are going to have to really think about concipio. This verb has many meanings. In English we have the same problem with “conceive”, which mean “become pregnant” or “perceive with the mind”. Concipio is in its most fundamental sense “to take or lay hold of, to take to one’s self, to take in, take, receive”. Logically there extends from this fundamental meaning a physical idea of fecundation and an intellectual or sensory idea of “to take or seize something by the sense of sight, to see, perceive” and “to comprehend intellectually, to take in, imagine, conceive, think”. Then we take another conceptual step (sorry, about that) to “to receive in one’s self, adopt, harbor any disposition of mind, emotion, passion, evil design, etc., to give place to, foster, to take in, receive; to commit”.
LITERAL TRANSLATION
O God, restorer and lover of innocence,
guide unto You the hearts of Your servants,
so that, once the ardor of Your Spirit has been taken in,
they may be found both to be steadfast in faith
and efficacious at work.
This prayer brings me to think of baptism and also the sacrament of penance.
In baptism, we are forgiven the original sin of which we are guilty by our being children of our first parents. When Adam and Eve sinned, the whole race sinned, but it just happens that the whole race was only two members. God restores us to a state of friendship with Him, of innocence, even though it is not the original innocence of the time before the fall. Baptism removes the stain of original sin and also of all the actual sins we have committed. The Holy Spirit makes His dwelling in our souls with the Father and the Son. In a sense the Holy Spirit is “conceived” in our souls, in the various senses of that word.
When we drive the indwelling Spirit from our souls through mortal sin, it can be restored to us through the sacrament of penance, when Christ Himself in the person of the priest, alter Christus, completely removes the sins from our soul, restoring us to God’s friendship.
There are may things in this changing and shifting world which can erode the steadfastness of a human heart. This world by its very nature is passing. If we give our hearts to these passing things, or set them in the place that belongs to the One who is eternal and ever faithful, we will be lost forever. When we are attached overly to the passing things of this world we cannot be effective in our work, in the vocation God conceived for us from before the creation of the universe.
NEW CORRECTED ICEL VERSION:
O God, who delight in innocence and restore it,
direct the hearts of your servants to yourself,
that, caught up in the fire of your Spirit,
we may be found steadfast in faith
and effective in works.
LAME-DUCK ICEL:
God of love, [You must be joking. Really?]
bring us back to you.
Send your Spirit to make us strong in faith,
and active in good works.
You decide.
Those who are bound by the law are to do penance on Fridays of Lent.
However, tomorrow, Friday is 25 March, the Solemnity (in the post-Conciliar calendar) of the Annunciation.
Please attend to can. 1251.
Can. 1251 Abstinence from meat, or from some other food as determined by the Episcopal Conference, is to be observed on all Fridays, unless a solemnity should fall on a Friday. Abstinence and fasting are to be observed on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday.
For those who don’t like the Novus Ordo… your likes or dislikes make not the slightest difference. If you are a subject of the Latin Church, the 1983 Code pertains to you. Since in the Ordinary Form the Feast of the Annunciation has the rank of a Solemnity, and since can. 1251 applies to you, you are not bound to your Friday penance.
Of course you can do as you please. Do penance if you choose. You are not bound to it.
In these cases of great feasts during Lent, I generally suggest that people keep their festivities somewhat muted. But the Solemnity is a true Feast Day.
Be penitentially festive, festively penitent.
There was a great deal of anxiety poured out by traditionalists over reports that an upcoming Instruction on Summorum Pontificum might erode Pope Benedict’s own provisions. I was skeptical about that and cautioned calm and the action of prayer for the Holy Father and confusion to the Holy Father’s enemies.
In any event, I am sure that a lot of people prayed and still pray about this.
The generally fair-minded and nearly ubiquitous John L. Allen, sadly still writing for dissenter’s central National Catholic Fishwrap has a piece about the upcoming Instruction together with some less interesting comments about the discussions betwixt the SSPX and a team appointed by the Holy See.
The bit about the discussions doesn’t say too much we don’t know: Sun rises in East… Discussions are hard going.
Regarding the Instruction, however, Mr. Allen wrote:
Speaking on background, Vatican officials insist that’s not the case [That the Instruction will actually undermine Summorum Pontificum.].
Instead, they say, the instruction will confirm that the moto proprio is now the universal law of the church, and insist that bishops apply it. Among other things, it will call for seminarians to be trained not just in Latin, but in the older rite itself, at least so they will know how to execute it faithfully and understand what’s being said.
The instruction will also confirm that the older Mass must be available wherever “groups of faithful” request it, without specifying how many people it takes to constitute a “group.”
The instruction will likewise confirm that the older liturgy is to be celebrated during Holy Week wherever there’s a “stable group” of faithful attached to it, as well as in religious orders which use the extraordinary rite. [But apparently not for the Ambrosian Rite priests… which is puzzling.]
On the other hand, the instruction will probably not satisfy all traditionalist hopes. For example, it will probably not give a seminarian in a regular diocesan seminary the right to be ordained according to the pre-Vatican II ritual, in part [Attention…] because that ritual presumes ordination to “minor orders” and the sub-diaconate, which were suppressed under Pope Paul VI.
I had not thought of that last point, about minor orders, as the reason to withhold freedom from bishops to use the older Pontifical Romanum to ordain as it pleaseth to ordain.
The answer about withholding the older Pontificale was based on commonsense: Seminarians would all, or 99% of them, opt for the older Rite of ordination. This doesn’t cast doubt on the validity of the newer rite. But given a choice, only the rare seminarian today would choose to be ordained with the newer rite for reasons that should be obvious to anyone who knows the difference between the two forms.
But Mr. Allen’s comment touches on another, though related, issue. I have long thought about the conundrum posed about the conferring of minor orders in traditional groups such as the FSSP, though not in this matter of the use of the Pontificale by residential bishops or their delegates.
My basic questions revolve around this two-fold aporia:
QUAERITUR: If there are no minor orders anymore, then why does the Holy See allow groups to pretend there are and go through fake ceremonies?
QUAERITUR: If there are still minor orders, then why can’t they be extended to all seminarians?
Be sure to check out the latest by my friend Samuel Gregg who writes for Acton Institute. Mr. Gregg has a fine comparison of Papa Joseph Ratzinger and Fr. Hans Kung, sparked by the coincidental release of their respective new books. The Pope published his second volume on Jesus of Nazareth, while Kung put out his Can The Church Still Be Saved.
Results vary.
Gregg points out parallels and differences between the man who is now Vicar of Christ and the man who is now forbidden to teach in a Catholic faculty.
Here is a taste of Gregg’s look at the two authors and the two books:
But perhaps the most revealing difference between Benedict and Fr. Kung’s books is the tone. Can the Church still be saved? is characterized by anger – the fury of an enfant terrible who’s not-so-enfant anymore and who knows the game is up: that his vision of Catholicism can’t be saved from the irredeemable irrelevance into which it has sunk.
Jesus of Nazareth, however, is pervaded by humility: the humility of one who approaches human history’s greatest mystery, applies to it his full intellect, and then presents his contribution for others’ assessment.
Check out Mr. Gregg’s piece for more.
From Damian Thompson‘s blog:
Bring back the biretta: why hatless priests should reclaim their heritage
By Damian Thompson Religion Last updated: March 24th, 2011
Here is a splendid new blog devoted entirely to the subject of birettas – a wonderful reproach to those Magic Circle clerics who think nothing of celebrating Mass in an Abigail’s Party-style cocktail frock “for the larger lady” but sneer at the magnificent traditional headgear of the Latin Church.
The Domus Birettarum blog [There is such a thing?] not only illustrates the wondrous variety of birettas but also makes them bespoke for those priests brave enough to wear them. And I do mean brave. I know several young clergy who would like to wear a biretta, but worry that their right-on septuagenarian PP will dob them in to the diocese for doing so.
As for their other major anxiety, I’m assured that if the biretta is placed gently enough on the crown, it doesn’t create the dreaded “hat hair”.
Is Damian is treating the biretta with the gravity it merits?
Everyone knows that the best defense against hat hair is short hair.
o{];¬)
As I was looking for more information on the so-called “Augustinian biretta” (which seems to be a lot taller than a Roman biretta), on Dieter Philippi’s site I ran across papal cuff links worn by Benedict XVI.

“Hmmm…”, quoth I. “They look familiar.”

I received these as an ordination gift from a Roman acquaintance.
Great minds, and all that.
[CUE MUSIC]
And while you are contemplating that, why not enjoy a steaming WDTPRS mug of Mystic Monk Coffee?
That’s right, lifting that eye-catching mug, filled with that nose-catching infusion, is sure to raise your spirits and even allow your own cufflinks to shine.
I’ll bet the Wyoming Carmelites love Pope Benedict and admire his cuff links… even though they don’t really need cuff links of their own, come to think of it. That’s because their sleeves are rolled up as they build their new monastery and roast that coffee!
Never mind about the cuff links.
Try the monthly subscription to their coffee of the month!
Mystic Monk!
It’s restorative! It’s roborative!
It’s swell!
From reader:
The Harvard Knights of Columbus and the Harvard Latin Mass Society invite you to celebrate the Feast of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Friday, March 25th, 2011, at 5:15pm.
Mass in the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.
St. Paul Catholic Church, Bow and Arrow Streets, Cambridge, MAReception to Follow; All are welcome.
For more information, email HarvardLatinMass@gmail.comFind the event on Facebook.
Been waiting for this Mass in Harvard Square for years? Want to see how Catholics worshiped for over five centuries? Then help us celebrate this momentous occasion.
Never been to a Latin Mass before? No clue what the Extraordinary Form is?
This will be the perfect introduction. English-Latin aids will also be available.To find out more about the Harvard Knights of Columbus, see www.harvardknights.org
Let’s have a cheer for HAHVard!
Not loud enough to be vulgar,
But loud enough to be heard!
H-A-R with a V!
V-A-R with a D!
HAHVard!
HAHVard!
WEEEE!