Benedict XVI’s sermon for 1st Mass of Christmas: Really and truly!

Here is the Holy Father’s Sermon for the 1st Mass of Christmas, with my emphases and comments.

Dear Brothers and Sisters!

“You are my son, this day I have begotten you” – with this passage from Psalm 2 the Church begins the liturgy of this holy night. She knows that this passage originally formed part of the coronation rite of the kings of Israel. The king, who in himself is a man like others, becomes the “Son of God” through being called and installed in his office. It is a kind of adoption by God, a decisive act by which he grants a new existence to this man, drawing him into his own being. The reading from the prophet Isaiah that we have just heard presents the same process even more clearly in a situation of hardship and danger for Israel: “To us a child is born, to us a son is given. The government will be upon his shoulder” (Is 9:6). Installation in the office of king is like a second birth. [What popped into my mind at this point was the Holy Father’s message, “Christmas thought” to the people of the UK, and his state visit, and then Aidan Nichols’ bool The Realm. ] As one newly born through God’s personal choice, as a child born of God, the king embodies hope. On his shoulders the future rests. He is the bearer of the promise of peace. On that night in Bethlehem this prophetic saying came true in a way that would still have been unimaginable at the time of Isaiah. Yes indeed, now it really is a child on whose shoulders government is laid. [And this historically did happen.] In him the new kingship appears that God establishes in the world. This child is truly born of God. [His use of “really” here, and “truly”, suggest to me that part of what the Holy Father is driving at is that many people have lost track of the fact that the actually happened, in a historical way.  This is fact, not myth or fiction.   This isn’t just a quaint story.  It is real.  It is the historical event which gives meaning to the rest of history, even our great shames and disasters.] It is God’s eternal Word that unites humanity with divinity. To this child belong those titles of honour which Isaiah’s coronation song attributes to him: Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace (Is 9:6). Yes, this king does not need counsellors drawn from the wise of this world. He bears in himself God’s wisdom and God’s counsel. In the weakness of infancy, he is the mighty God and he shows us God’s own might in contrast to the self-asserting powers of this world.

Truly, the words of Israel’s coronation rite were only ever rites of hope which looked ahead to a distant future that God would bestow. None of the kings who were greeted in this way lived up to the sublime content of these words. In all of them, those words about divine sonship, about installation into the heritage of the peoples, about making the ends of the earth their possession (Ps 2:8) were only pointers towards what was to come – as it were signposts of hope indicating a future that at that moment was still beyond comprehension. [This is also about our own time, no?  If things are not looking so good right now… there is hope in our future.] Thus the fulfilment of the prophecy, which began that night in Bethlehem, is both infinitely greater and in worldly terms smaller than the prophecy itself might lead one to imagine. It is greater in the sense that this child is truly the Son of God, truly “God from God, light from light, begotten not made, of one being with the Father”. The infinite distance between God and man is overcome. God has not only bent down, as we read in the Psalms; he has truly “come down”, he has come into the world, he has become one of us, in order to draw all of us to himself. This child is truly Emmanuel – God-with-us. His kingdom truly stretches to the ends of the earth. He has truly [Sensing a theme yet?] built islands of peace in the world-encompassing breadth of the holy Eucharist. Wherever it is celebrated, an island of peace arises, of God’s own peace. This child has ignited the light of goodness in men and has given them strength to overcome the tyranny of might. This child builds his kingdom in every generation from within, from the heart. But at the same time it is true that the “rod of his oppressor” is not yet broken, the boots of warriors continue to tramp and the “garment rolled in blood” (Is 9:4f) still remains. So part of this night is simply joy at God’s closeness. We are grateful that God gives himself into our hands as a child, begging as it were for our love, implanting his peace in our hearts. But this joy is also a prayer: Lord, make your promise come fully true. Break the rods of the oppressors. Burn the tramping boots. Let the time of the garments rolled in blood come to an end. Fulfil the prophecy that “of peace there will be no end” (Is 9:7). We thank you for your goodness, but we also ask you to show forth your power. [This is an “end time” prayer.  This is what we hope for at the end of things, for the Second Coming.] Establish the dominion of your truth and your love in the world – the “kingdom of righteousness, love and peace”.

“Mary gave birth to her first-born son” (Lk 2:7). In this sentence Saint Luke recounts quite soberly the great event to which the prophecies from Israel’s history had pointed. Luke calls the child the “first-born”. [It almost feels like a second sermon now.] In the language which developed within the sacred Scripture of the Old Covenant, “first-born” does not mean the first of a series of children. The word “first-born” is a title of honour, quite independently of whether other brothers and sisters follow or not. So Israel is designated by God in the Book of Exodus (4:22) as “my first-born Son”, and this expresses Israel’s election, its singular dignity, the particular love of God the Father. The early Church knew that in Jesus this saying had acquired a new depth, that the promises made to Israel were summed up in him. Thus the Letter to the Hebrews calls Jesus “the first-born”, simply in order to designate him as the Son sent into the world by God (cf. 1:5-7) after the ground had been prepared by Old Testament prophecy. The first-born belongs to God in a special way – and therefore he had to be handed over to God in a special way – as in many religions – and he had to be ransomed through a vicarious sacrifice, as Saint Luke recounts in the episode of the Presentation in the Temple. The first-born belongs to God in a special way, and is as it were destined for sacrifice. In Jesus’ sacrifice on the Cross this destiny of the first-born is fulfilled in a unique way. In his person he brings humanity before God and unites man with God in such a way that God becomes all in all. Saint Paul amplified and deepened the idea of Jesus as first-born in the Letters to the Colossians and to the Ephesians: Jesus, we read in these letters, is the first-born of all creation – the true prototype of man, according to which God formed the human creature. Man can be the image of God because Jesus is both God and man, the true image of God and of man. Furthermore, as these letters tell us, he is the first-born from the dead. In the resurrection he has broken down the wall of death for all of us. He has opened up to man the dimension of eternal life in fellowship with God. Finally, it is said to us that he is the first-born of many brothers. Yes indeed, now he really is the first of a series of brothers and sisters: the first, that is, who opens up for us the possibility of communing with God. He creates true brotherhood – not the kind defiled by sin as in the case of Cain and Abel, or Romulus and Remus, but the new brotherhood in which we are God’s own family. This new family of God begins at the moment when Mary wraps her first-born in swaddling clothes and lays him in a manger. [And as the first section resolved with a prayerful invocation…] Let us pray to him: Lord Jesus, who wanted to be born as the first of many brothers and sisters, grant us the grace of true brotherhood. Help us to become like you. Help us to recognize your face in others who need our assistance, in those who are suffering or forsaken, in all people, and help us to live together with you as brothers and sisters, so as to become one family, your family.

At the end of the Christmas Gospel, we are told that a great heavenly host of angels praised God and said: “Glory to God in the highest and on earth peace among men with whom he is pleased!” (Lk 2:14). [And so seemingly a third section.   Could he be giving sermons for the three Christmas Masses, perhaps, though in the context of the midnight Mass?  Let’s find out.] The Church has extended this song of praise, which the angels sang in response to the event of the holy night, into a hymn of joy at God’s glory – “we praise you for your glory”. We praise you for the beauty, for the greatness, for the goodness of God, which becomes visible to us this night. The appearing of beauty, of the beautiful, makes us happy without our having to ask what use it can serve. God’s glory, from which all beauty derives, causes us to break out in astonishment and joy. Anyone who catches a glimpse of God experiences joy, and on this night we see something of his light. But the angels’ message on that holy night also spoke of men: “Peace among men with whom he is pleased”. [And now some WDTPRS from the Roman Pontiff…] The Latin translation of the angels’ song that we use in the liturgy, taken from Saint Jerome, is slightly different: “peace to men of good will”. The expression “men of good will” has become an important part of the Church’s vocabulary in recent decades. [“bonae voluntatis”… we have the problem also of the subjective genitive and the objective genitive.  Whose good will?  Peace to men of good will.  Whose?  God’s good will?  Men having good will?] But which is the correct translation? We must read both texts together; only in this way do we truly understand the angels’ song. It would be a false interpretation to see this exclusively as the action of God, as if he had not called man to a free response of love. But it would be equally mistaken to adopt a moralizing interpretation as if man were so to speak able to redeem himself by his good will. Both elements belong together: grace and freedom, God’s prior love for us, without which we could not love him, and the response that he awaits from us, the response that he asks for so palpably through the birth of his son. We cannot divide up into independent entities the interplay of grace and freedom, or the interplay of call and response. The two are inseparably woven together. So this part of the angels’ message is both promise and call at the same time. God has anticipated us with the gift of his Son. God anticipates us again and again in unexpected ways. He does not cease to search for us, to raise us up as often as we might need. He does not abandon the lost sheep in the wilderness into which it had strayed. God does not allow himself to be confounded by our sin. Again and again he begins afresh with us. But he is still waiting for us to join him in love. He loves us, so that we too may become people who love, so that there may be peace on earth.

Saint Luke does not say that the angels sang. He states quite soberly: the heavenly host praised God and said: “Glory to God in the highest” (Lk 2:13f.). But men have always known that the speech of angels is different from human speech, and that above all on this night of joyful proclamation it was in song that they extolled God’s heavenly glory. So this angelic song has been recognized from the earliest days as music proceeding from God, [In the Old Testament, when and angel comes and speaks, it is very difficult to tell in the account just who the speaker is, the angel or God.  Of course, the angel doing God’s will is so in harmony with God that the confusion is understandable.  When a messenger speaks, he speaks not his own words, but the words of the one who sent him.] indeed, as an invitation to join in the singing with hearts filled with joy at the fact that we are loved by God. Cantare amantis est, says Saint Augustine: singing belongs to one who loves. [Augustine did not say “He who sings prays twice”.] Thus, down the centuries, the angels’ song has again and again become a song of love and joy, a song of those who love. At this hour, full of thankfulness, we join in the singing of all the centuries, singing that unites heaven and earth, angels and men. Yes, indeed, we praise you for your glory. We praise you for your love. Grant that we may join with you in love more and more and thus become people of peace. Amen.

I am interested in your take on the Holy Father’s sermon.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity, The Drill |
13 Comments

WDTPRS 24 December COLLECT (2002MR): The consolations of Thy Coming.

TissotThe Collect for today’s Mass in the 2002MR, the last of Advent, brings us to the very threshold of the humble place where the Lord was born.

COLLECT (2002MR):
Festina, quaesumus, ne tardaveris, Domine Iesu,
ut adventus tui consolationibus subleventur,
qui in tua pietate confidunt
.

The tardaveris form is a perfect subjunctive as a kind of imperative.  Remember that adventus here is a genitive with tui.   Pietas, when it refers to man has to do with “duty”, but when applied to God, it becomes “mercy… pity”.

Sublevo means, basically, “to lift up from beneath, to raise up, hold up, support”, but it comes to mean, “to sustain, support, assist, encourage, console any one in misfortune”.  The perfect way to describe this vale of tears in which we journey.

WDTPRS LITERAL VERSION:
Hurry, we beseech Thee, O Lord Jesus, and tarry not,
that those who rely upon Thy mercy
may be sustained by the consolations of Thy Coming.

Had the Lord not entered into human history, what would sustain us?  What would sustain creation itself, groaning as it does under the weight of the Fall.

The Collect looks simultaneously back to the Nativity of the Eternal Word made man, but also forward to the Second Coming.  We are consoled at the Coming of the Lord, in history and in the time to come.

The Christian always says “Come, Lord Jesus.  Maranatha.   Come.”

May the Lord’s coming and promise of return console any of you who are burdened with sorrow. Many people feel at times inconsolable. This time of year can be a annual trial of despair and sadness for so many who are alone and suffering.

In imitation of the Lord, console others.  You know someone, I am sure.

A REVISED ICEL VERSION:
Hurry, we beg you,
do not delay, Lord Jesus,
so  that those who trust in your faithfulness
may be uplifted by the comfort of your coming
.

Posted in ADVENT, WDTPRS |
Comments Off on WDTPRS 24 December COLLECT (2002MR): The consolations of Thy Coming.

The sad canonical tale of Sr. Margaret McBride

The distinguished canonist Ed Peter’s on his blog In The Light Of The Law has a good examination of the canonical censure incurred by Sr. Margaret McBride of St. Joseph’s Hospital in Phoenix, AZ.  Sr. McBride played a crucial role in the performance of a direct abortion in that formerly Catholic hospital.  For her part in the abortion, the local ordinary Bp. Thomas Olmsted declared that she had incurred an excommunication.  Sr. McBride is excommunicated.

Thus, Ed Peters and his canonical explanation:

Toward clarifying the canonical status of Sr. Margaret McBride

As more of the record concerning the canonical situation of Sr. Margaret McBride comes to light, it is good to see some surmises about her status being confirmed and/or various gaps in our information being filled. Specifically, we now know that Bp. Olmsted declared the excommunication of McBride following the disclosure of her role in procuring the abortion of a baby at St. Joseph’s hospital in 2009. The fact of the bishop’s declaration has some important implications for McBride’s canonical status in religious life and in the Church.

First, whatever was McBride’s status per 1983 CIC 1331 § 1 as one (probably) laboring under a latae sententiae excommunication (and, yes, I am happy to renew my call for the elimination of automatic sanctions), her status as one laboring under a declared excommunication is governed chiefly by 1983 CIC 1331 § 2. While she is not dispensed from the general obligations of religious life, the Divine Office, or the Sunday obligation, McBride is now prevented from attempting to perform any ministerial functions in the Eucharist (reader, etc.), from participating in the sacraments or sacramentals, and from obtaining indulgences (c. 996). Also, under pain of invalidity, she cannot perform acts of ecclesiastical office (c. 145) in her religious institute or in the Church. Hers is, in short, and is intended to be in light of her grave offense against the life of an innocent child, quite a debilitated state.

Second, McBride’s reconciliation (for which we should all pray) is not simply a question of moral theology and treatable, therefore, in sacramental Confession; her juridic status is now changed to the point where, for the remission of her sanction, Olmsted must play a role either directly (c. 1355 § 1, n. 1) or in consultation with another local ordinary (c. 1355 § 1, n. 2).

Indeed, in this one respect, I would differ with Olmsted’s decision to keep the declaration of McBride’s excommunication confidential, lest presbyteral confessors who might be approached by McBride for reconciliation mistakenly think that they still have the authority to address her juridic situation under Canon 1357. They do not have that authority (outside of danger of death, of course, per c. 976).

Third, while the dismissal of McBride from her religious institute would seem an appropriate next step, I think her superiors should proceed with caution. Yes, Canon 695 mandates the dismissal of any religious found guilty of violating Canon 1398 against abortion. But, I would suggest that McBride was not, strictly speaking, excommunicated for procuring an abortion, but rather, for lending formal and necessary cooperation toward an abortion, that is, for being an accomplice to abortion and thus liable to excommunication per 1983 CIC 1329 § 2. There are differences between committing a crime, and being an accomplice to one committing crime.

My suggestion of, to put it colloquially, some “wiggle room”, under can. 695 in McBride’s case is consistent not simply with the plain text of the law(s), but with the fact that the other two ‘mandatory dismissal’ canons referenced in can. 695 (namely, cann. 1395 and 1397) describe offenses that, while also very serious, come in degrees of wrong-doing and thus, by their nature, allow (indeed, require) religious superiors to look at the concrete facts of the case to determine whether a religious’ involvement in such deeds warrants dismissal. Interestingly, Canon 695, which ties a superior’s hands in some cases that might warrant some flexibility, is not found in Eastern law.

Abortion, on the other hand, is an all-or-nothing type of crime. If a religious is guilty of abortion, he or she can and should be dismissed. But, the all-or-nothing character of abortion suggests that where, within the law, some way of looking at the concrete facts exists, that way should be used. In poenis benignior est interpretatio facienda. Regula Iuris n. 49, in VI° (1298). Besides, if McBride should prove obdurate in refusing to repent of her role in the death of an innocent human being, Canon 696 provides more than sufficient basis for her expulsion from religious life, and sooner than later at that.

I’m sorry that the canonical implications of killing a pre-born baby take our attention just before celebrating the Nativity of Our Lord. That’s why we call it “this Valley of Tears”, no? Christmas blessings on all my readers. Oremus pro invicem.

Many thanks to Ed Peters for this clear explanation.  Be sure to visit his blog In The Light Of The Law.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The Drill | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

The Holy Father’s Christmas Message to the UK and some reactions

BBCThe UK’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald, proffers the full text of the Holy Father’s message.

My emphases and comments:

Recalling with great fondness my four-day visit to the United Kingdom last September, I am glad to have the opportunity to greet you once again, [New Evangelization requires followups.] and indeed to greet listeners everywhere as we prepare to celebrate the birth of Christ.

Our thoughts turn back to a moment in history [This is not a myth.] when God’s chosen people, the children of Israel, were living in intense expectation.

They were waiting for the Messiah that God had promised to send and they pictured him as a great leader who would rescue them from foreign domination and restore their freedom.

God is always faithful to his promises, but he often surprises us in the way he fulfils them.

The child that was born in Bethlehem did indeed bring liberation, but not only for the people of that time and place – he was to be the Saviour of all people throughout the world and throughout history[Indeed, salvation for any person comes only through Christ.]

And it was not a political liberation that he brought, achieved through military means; rather, Christ destroyed death forever and restored life by means of his shameful death on the Cross.

And while he was born in poverty and obscurity, far from the centres of earthly power, he was none other than the Son of God.

Out of love for us, he took upon himself our human condition, our fragility, our vulnerability and he opened up for us the path that leads to the fullness of life to a share in the life of God himself.

As we ponder this great mystery in our hearts this Christmas, let us give thanks to God for his goodness to us and let us joyfully proclaim to those around us the good news that God offers us freedom from whatever weighs us down: he gives us hope, he brings us life.

Dear Friends from Scotland, England, Wales and indeed every part of the English-speaking world. I want you to know that I keep all of you very much in my prayers this Holy Season.

I pray for your families, for your children, for those who are sick and for those who are going through any form of hardship at this time.

I pray especially for the elderly and for those who are approaching the end of their days.

I ask Christ, the light of the nations, to dispel whatever darkness there may be in your lives and to grant to every one of you the grace of a peaceful and joyful Christmas.

May God bless all of you!

While the Holy Father says this was for everyone, it was delivered to the people of the UK.  We should look to their reactions.

Damian Thompson’s take begins with his entry title:

The Pope on Thought for the Day: ‘mere Christianity’ without the toe-curling whimsy

The Saviour of all people throughout the world and throughout history. There’s no sense here of Christianity as just one among many “faith communities”. The Pope was indeed being “inclusive”, but not in the way that Thought for the Day encourages its contributors to be. One can’t help wondering: if Benedict was an ordinary contributor who’d been required to submit his script for vetting the night before, as usually happens, would BBC Religion and Ethics – which controls the three-minute slot, much to the annoyance of the Today team – have insisted on a little PC fluffiness?

Damian also spotlights the secularist reaction, thusly:

Christmas hilarity as National Secular Society goes nuts over Pope’s Thought for the Day

You will recall that these were the ones who threw a nutty over the Pope’s state visit.

Thus, Damian:

In Part One yesterday, NSS executive director Keith Porteous Wood and NSS chairman Terry Sanderson got a little hot under the collar after they learned that Pope Benedict XVI had been invited to deliver the Christmas Eve Thought for the Day on Radio 4! Much hilarity ensued as Keith and Terry literally fell over each other trying to be the first to sock it to Old Redsocks. “No platform for the Pope,” wrote Keith, and was just about to press “send” when Terry – accidentally! – split a mug of Fairtrade coffee over the keyboard. After being chased round the kitchen by his angry pal, Terry fished his mobile phone out of his pocket and tapped out the words “no uninterrupted platform on Thought for the Day“…

… and left viewers in suspense until Part Two, going out later today, entitled “Why has the BBC become the official propaganda arm of the Vatican?”

The great Fr. Blake, P.P. of Brighton made this observation:

What I thought was even more interesting was a very surreal interview with Archbishop Longley, it was almost paradigm of how English Church seems to work. Humphries was asking him some very real questions about adherence to the Catholic Faith, whether people accepted or rejected the Church’s teaching on such issues as abortion, contraception women priests and homosexuality and the Archbishop kept going on about Newman and the development of doctrine, speaking about the Church changing and adapting to the times.
What he seemed incapable of saying is that the Church proclaims the Gospel which is unchanging and counter-cultural, it offers the Truth “which the world cannot accept”.

I am sure we will see more reactions.

Posted in New Evangelization, REVIEWS, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
6 Comments

New options for watching Papal Masses LIVE

I received good news this morning.

For Christmas, Vatican Radio’s website is offering its users a new service. It will allow users to stream liturgical celebrations presided over by the Holy Father through audio/video, live and in high definition: The Vigil Mass on Friday, December 24 starting at 22.00; the Christmas Message with the “Urbi et Orbi” blessing on December 25 starting at 12:00; and the marking of the World Day of Peace on January 1 at 10.00.

Audio will be available in the following languages: Italian, English, French, German, Spanish and Portuguese. For the vigil on December 24 commentary in Chinese will be available, and for the celebration on January 1 Arabic will also be available. [How about NO LANGUAGE?]

Access to the player is very simple: Go to our homepage at www.vaticanradio.org and click on “Audio Video Player” on the top-left.

It is great that they are updating!   Usually in the Vatican they update their technology every 75 years, whether it needs it or not.

A view of their new viewer:

Many people who like to watch the Papal Masses on TV or over the internet have often lamented that they would like a raw feed without the voice over commentary.  Sadly, because the commentary is from the Vatican RADIO, there is sometimes too much chatter for a stream with video.

We whiners and complainers need to keep pushing for a stream without voice over commentary.

UPDATE:

Eucharistic Celebration
at 10.00 pm
[ROME TIME]


From St. Peter’s Basilica, Eucharistic Celebration presided over by Pope Benedict XVI

Live Broadcast from 09.50 p.m.

– in French for Western Africa on kHz 7.365, 9.755 SW, for the Rome area on MHz 93,3 FM and via Internet on Channel 1

-in Chinese for Asia on kHz 6.025, 7.410 SW, for the Rome area on MHz 103,8 FM and via Internet on Channel 2

-in German for Central-Western Europe on kHz 5.885 SW, for the Rome area on kHz 1.611 MW and via Internet on Channel 3

-in Spanish for Central America on kHz 7.335 SW, for the Rome area on kHz 1.260 MW and via Internet on Channel 4

-in Italian for Italy on kHz 4.005 SW and kHz 1.530 MW, for the Rome area on kHz 585 MW, MHz 105,0 FM, for Europe linked up with RAI and via internet on Channel 5

-in Portuguese for Africa on kHz 11.630 SW and via Internet on Channel 6

-in English via Internet on Channel 7

-International Sound via Internet on Channel 8

Play
Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
10 Comments

Last minute gift idea? A special price on The Catholic Herald web edition!

Catholic HeraldThe other day I mentioned in another entry that The Catholic Herald, the UK’s best Catholic weekly, had a special price right now for their web edition.

Last minute gift idea for a person who may be hard to buy for?  A good source for yourself?

At the time of this writing, The Catholic Herald has lowered its web subscription rate from 38 (US $58.80) to 10 (US $15.50).

You get the entire newspaper, not just the items on their webpage.

I don’t live in England, but I find what is going on there interesting.  In a sense, they are a few years ahead of the US in the culture wars.  Catholics there have a tougher row to hoe in the public square… or should I say ‘common’?  It is interesting to see, for example, how they publish side by side with the Ordinary Form, the Extraordinary Form liturgical calendar notes each week along with places and schedules where you can find it.

Another advantage is that you don’t have to wait for it to come in the mail. If you are not in the UK that takes a while.  And it has been a growing problem, because postal rates are climbing for small publications.

And you have the whole thing archived online: less clutter.  They have an archive you can access going back to 2003.

Go to http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/sales and enter the promo code: CHPROMO

(Too bad they don’t have a FRZ promo code!)

I think very highly of the paper and the people who put it together. Please give The Catholic Herald some support.  Good Catholic publications need our support.

Posted in REVIEWS, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
3 Comments

Clarification… Ding… Dong… Ding

I had posted here that Lloyd Dean is the Catholic Healthcare Association’s Chairman. At this time he is not. He was in 2008. But he is now on the Executive Committee of CHA.

You begin to see the interlocking players as this ongoing project of replacing the Church’s Magisterium continues.

Again, we have seen this movie before and it ain’t The Bell’s Of St. Mary’s!

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged
5 Comments

Why a woman has chosen to stop receiving Communion on the tongue

From the National Catholic REGISTER.  My emphases and comments:

Why I’m Giving Up Communion On the Tongue
Share BY DANIELLE BEAN

I have always received the Eucharist on the tongue.

This is not something I usually get all political or righteous about. I understand that many devout people hold different opinions on this topic and that “good” Catholics are free to receive on the hand or on the tongue. [That is, for now, the Church’s law.  But let us not forget that Communion in the hand is a departure from the actual norm.] For me, though, receiving on the tongue has always felt like the most appropriate way to recognize and respect Christ’s real presence in the Eucharist.

But now I’m not so sure anymore.

While I still very much prefer to receive on the tongue, I am afraid that option is becoming a less reasonable choice for me. And, ironically, it’s becoming a less respectful way to receive the Eucharist. [?]

At the Masses I attend, more often than not, I receive Communion from an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion. These EMHCs, more often than not, have no idea what to do when a person presents herself to receive Communion on the tongue. I am not blaming them for this problem so much as whatever training they have received. I know that their training for Communion on the tongue is inadequate because …

—Some of them place the host on my tongue along with what feels like their entire hand.

—Some rush to jam the host into my mouth even as they are still saying “Body of Christ” and I am hurrying to respond “Amen.”

—Some ignore my children’s open mouths and opt instead to force the host between the fingers of their folded hands.

—And finally, some, like the poor lady who gave me Communion yesterday, are so flustered and anxious in the face of an on-the-tongue situation, that they fail to place the host anywhere near my tongue. They let go of it somewhere on the approach to my face and it winds up on floor.

[From Redemptionis Sacramentum: “[92.] … If there is a risk of profanation, then Holy Communion should not be given in the hand to the faithful.”]

The woman yesterday apologized and immediately picked it up. Thoroughly defeated, I offered my hands for her to place it in.

It shouldn’t be this hard.  [Where is the pastor?]

I know I could “solve” this problem by only attending Mass in the Extraordinary Form where receiving on the tongue while kneeling is the norm. But that is just not a realistic option for me. [This isn’t an Extraordinary Form v. Ordinary Form question.]

I could be stubborn and insist upon receiving on the tongue because I have a right to, even when the challenges it causes become a distraction to myself and others. But that doesn’t seem like something Christ would want me to do. [Hmmm…]

Jesus is Jesus, in my hand or on my tongue.  [Yes.]

And that is why I am 90% convinced that from now on, when I receive the Eucharist from an EMHC, I should put my own preferences aside and receive in the way that is least likely to cause confusion and distraction—in the hand.

O Jesus, meek and humble of heart, make my heart like yours!

Surely this will cause some discussion.

Off the top of my head a few questions pop up.

Where is the pastor?  If the is what the EMHC are doing, the pastor should intervene.  If the pastor won’t, then the bishop must.   They must be informed.

If the writer is concerned about her children, and their experience of receiving Communion, what does she teach them about giving in when it comes to receiving Christ in a way that she clearly thinks is less reverent?

We have to get the word out more and more.

If you are going to contribute to a conversation here, exercise some self-editing and try to raise the level.  Blast away and I will blast you right out of the combox.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity |
112 Comments

The Pope will follow up with the British people on Christmas

In case you haven’t see this… from AFP:

Pope to deliver Christmas message on the BBC

LONDON (AFP) – Pope Benedict XVI will deliver a brief message for BBC radio’s “Thought for the Day” programme on the morning of Christmas Eve, the broadcaster said Wednesday. [When you start on a “new evangelization”, you have to stick with it.]

In what is believed to be his first personally scripted broadcast, the pope will address listeners in the short slot which traditionally goes out during the corporation’s flagship Today programme.

Benedict recorded the message in Rome on Wednesday.

Gwyneth Williams, the controller of BBC Radio 4, said he was “delighted Pope Benedict is sharing his Christmas message with the Radio 4 audience.

“It’s significant that the Pope has chosen Thought for the Day to give his first personally scripted broadcast — and what better time to do so than on the eve of one of the biggest celebrations on the Christian calendar.”

“Thought for the Day” consists of some five minutes of personal reflection from faith leaders and believers from other denominations.

The pope’s broadcast comes three months after he made a state visit to Britain.

Britain’s National Secular Society attacked the BBC’s move.

“The BBC is giving the Pope an unquestioned slot to continue whitewashing his Church’s disgraceful record on covering up child abuse by its priests,” said the group’s president, Terry Sanderson.d

Posted in New Evangelization, Pope of Christian Unity |
11 Comments

A little arm-chair medicine and the Phoenix Affair

It is hard to make long-distance determinations about the facts of a case when those facts are sketchy.

That said, a reader sent the following:

Just a bit of medical knowledge related to the abortion/Phoenix scandal:

I spoke with the head of Ethics/Chief Medical Officer at my place of work on the issue.  He-a retired Ob/Gyn surgeon and Catholic/pro-life-stated after ~5000 deliveries he personally performed and overeeing more as an administrator at Catholic hospitals, never has he seen a case where a mother was in danger of losing her life with an abortion as the answer[Guess there is case 5001, but it doesn’t look good for those who prescribe abortion, does it?] In the recent case-to his limited knowledge on the said situation-the doctors could have gotten her through a few more weeks and decided which was a safer place for the life: in the womb or in an intensive care unit.  Again, he cannot imagine in his experience that an abortion would even help the mother-and even if id could, you still do not perform [it].  (I am not even sure if an action of “double effect” could be done, like, for example, with an ectopic pregnancy.)
It’s diffiult once people know you are Catholic-they usually only see their individual rights!  I am very tired-but extremely glad-to defend Mother Church.
Some food for thought when considering the Phoenix Affair.

If there are some Catholic physicians reading, they might chime in.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The Drill | Tagged
23 Comments