QUAERITUR: homemade marriage vows

From a reader:

I recently attended a Catholic wedding between two Catholics. During the ceremony, I believe the couple did the declaration of intentions according to the Rite of Marriage. When it came to the wedding vows, instead of using the prescribed vows, the couple recited vows that I think they had written themselves. The vows were of a personal nature; specific to each person, as compared to the universal nature of the Church’s vows. I do not remember all of the specifics of the vows, but I have doubts as to whether or not they expressed the same ideas that are in the Church’s vows; i.e. to be true in good times and in bad, etc.

Is this marriage valid? How should I proceed? Do I need more information or should I not worry about it?

First, I must observe that your account is rather sketchy.  You don’t have any clear knowledge of what happened.  That in itself suggests that what was done should not have been done.  It also means that it would be difficult to do anything about it.

Second, if they wrote the texts themselves, I assume they read them from something.  They would have the texts.   However, it might be hard to get that text: “Hey, I think your marriage may be invalid.  Can I have the texts?”   I can see that that approach might be problematic from various points of view.

Third, is this any of your business?  It is the business of the pastor of the parish to see to things like this.  I you are deeply concerned, you could address the issue with the pastor and try to convince him to look into it.  However, if he permitted it in the first place, then he probably doesn’t see anything wrong with it.  I suppose it would be possible to send a note to the local bishop asking if it is permitted for people to write their own vows.  That might get some interest going.

That said, priests should make sure that the rites of the Church should be followed so that there is NO DOUBT about what happened.  If the pastor isn’t smart enough to do this, perhaps he needs to be doing some other good and useful work.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
21 Comments

APNews: “Catholic bloggers aim to purge dissenters”

From Townhall comes this:

Catholic bloggers aim to purge dissenters

APNews

Pressure is on to change the Roman Catholic Church in America, but it’s not coming from the usual liberal suspects. A new breed of theological conservatives has taken to blogs and YouTube to say the church isn’t Catholic enough.

Enraged by dissent that they believe has gone unchecked for decades, and unafraid to say so in the starkest language, these activists are naming names and unsettling the church[Based on the word choices, what do you think is the writer’s take on this?]

_ In the Archdiocese of Boston, parishioners are dissecting the work of a top adviser to the cardinal for any hint of Marxist influence.

_ Bloggers are combing through campaign finance records to expose staff of Catholic agencies who donate to politicians who support abortion rights.

_ RealCatholicTV.com, working from studios in suburban Detroit, is hunting for “traitorous” [Again, I wonder what the writer’s take is.  Do you think the writer is trying to connect this to the eeeeeevilllll of “McCarthy-ism”?] nuns, priests or bishops throughout the American church.

“We’re no more engaged in a witch hunt than a doctor excising a cancer is engaged in a witch hunt,” said Michael Voris of RealCatholicTV.com and St. Michael’s Media. “We’re just shining a spotlight on people who are Catholics who do not live the faith.”

John Allen, Vatican analyst for the National Catholic Reporter, has dubbed this trend “Taliban Catholicism.” But he says it’s not a strictly conservative phenomenon _ liberals can fit the mindset, too, Allen says. Some left-leaning Catholics are outraged by any exercise of church authority.

Yet on the Internet and in the church, conservatives are having the bigger impact.

Among Voris’ many media ventures is the CIA _ the Catholic Investigative Agency _ a program from RealCatholicTV to “bring to light the dark deeds of evil Catholics-in-name-only, who are hijacking the Church for their own ends, not the ends of Christ.”

[…]

Catholic officials are struggling to come to terms with the bloggers and have organized several recent media conferences on the topic, the latest at the Vatican this month. The U.S. bishops’ conference issued social media guidelines in July calling for Christian charity online.

Still, no one expects the Catholic blogosphere to change tone anytime soon. Many of the conservatives most active online had spent years raising the alarm about dissent on their own in their local dioceses without much effect. Now, they feel they are finally being heard online.

There’s a general sense among many faithful Catholics that no matter how much they write their bishops, no matter how much they go to the pastors, all of these unfaithful things keep getting taught,” Voris said. “I think enough Catholics are saying, ‘That’s it. I’ve had it.‘”

Posted in Throwing a Nutty |
85 Comments

Some critics of the new translations: “radioactively cynical”

Over at First Things Fr. Rutler has some comments about the new translation and liturgy in general.

Here are a few excerpts. We join him in medias res with my emphases and sinographs:

[…]

Publicly owned corporations are more accountable to their shareholders than tenured bureaucracies, which may explain why it took the Ford Motor Company only two years to cancel its Edsel, and not much longer for Coca Cola to restore its “classic” brand, while the Catholic Church has taken more than a generation of unstopped attrition to try to correct the mistakes of overheated liturgists. The dawning of the Age of Aquarius is now in its sunset repose and the bright young things who seem to be cropping up now all over the place with new information from Fortescue and Ratzinger, may either be the professional mourners for a lost civilization, or the sparks of a looming golden age.

One thing is certain to a pastor: the only parishioners fighting the old battles are old themselves, their felt banners frayed and their guitar strings broken, while a young battalion is rising, with no animus against the atrophied adolescence of their parents, and only eager to engage a real spiritual combat in a culture of death. They usually are ignorant, but bright, for ignorance is not stupidity.

They care little if the Liturgy is in Latin or English or Sanskrit, as long as they are told how to do it, for they were not told. Some critics of the new translations have warned that the changes are Shishi qiu shi : Seek truth from factstoo radical, which is radioactively cynical from people who in the 1960’s wantonly dismantled old verities overnight, in their suburbanized version of China’s Cultural Revolution.

[…]

I think there should be few options in the Liturgy, and no attempt to be “creative,” for that is God’s particular talent. As Vatican II taught in Sacrosanctum Concilium, “[T]here must be no innovations unless the good of the Church genuinely and certainly requires them; and care must be taken that any new forms adopted should in some way grow organically from forms already existing.”

[…]

While I am glad for the new and more accurate translation of the Mass, which is not perfection but closer to it than one deserves in an imperfect world, a far more important reform would be the return of the ad orientem position of the celebrant as normative. It is the antidote to the tendency of clerisy to impose itself on the people. When a celebrant at Mass stops and says, “This is not about me,” you may be sure he thinks it may be about him. It would be harder for him to harbor that suspicion were he leading the people humbly to the east and the dawn of salvation.

[…]

Posted in Mail from priests, The Drill | Tagged , ,
36 Comments

QUAERITUR: Old Rituale Romanum and “churching” of women

From a deacon:

May God Bless you for your work. I will be traveling home for
Thanksgiving break to Baptize my twin brother’s newborn son. He and
his wife are faithful, traditional Catholics. I was wondering if it is
still possible to celebrate for his wife the Churching of Women (or
the “Blessing of a Mother after Childbirth”), perhaps before the
Baptism? I’m assuming Summorum Pontificum expanded use of the older Blessings as well. But the new Book of Blessings, n. 237, says, “But the blessing after childbirth provided here is intended only for a mother who was unable to take part in the celebration of her child’s baptism.” And n.
257 indicates that there is a blessing of the mother at the end of the
Rite of Baptism, there n. 105 (but it is not quite the same). Can the
old Blessing still be done? If so, can a deacon do it?

Yes, the older Rituale Romanum can be used for the churching of women after childbirth.   Pastors may use the Rituale Romanum.

I am not sure that this can be delegated to a deacon.  The Rituale says “priest” throughout.  I think it must be done by a priest.

Furthermore, I hope that one of the results of the “gravitational pull” created by Summorum Pontificum, is that the “Book of Blessings” (a misnomer, since most of the prayers in the book don’t actually bless anything) gets pulled into a black hole and is never seen again.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
16 Comments

The 2012 Synod of Bishop will focus on…

From CNS comes this news.  Woo hoo.

Next synod theme: New evangelization

October 24, 2010 by John Thavis

VATICAN CITY — Pope Benedict announced today that he’s chosen “new evangelization” as the theme for the next world Synod of Bishops in 2012.

The pope said the topic reflects a need to re-evangelize in countries where Christian faith and practice have declined, and where people “have even moved away from the church.”

The pope made the announcement at the end of his homily at the closing Mass for the special Synod of Bishops for the Middle East, which focused on the pastoral challenges of the region. He said that in this synod, too, bishops spoke of the “need to offer the Gospel anew to people who do not know it very well.”

“What was often evoked was the need for a new evangelization for the Middle East as well. This was quite a widespread theme, especially in the countries where Christianity has ancient roots,” he said.

The pope said he chose the next synod topic, “The new evangelization for the transmission of the Christian faith,” after consulting with the world’s episcopate. He recently created the Pontifical Council for Promoting New Evangelization, and has made re-evangelizing a main theme of his pontificate.

In his homily, the pope also touched on the sensitive subject of religious freedom in the Middle East, especially in predominantly Muslim societies:

Another contribution that Christians can bring to society is the promotion of an authentic freedom of religion and conscience, one of the fundamental human rights that each state should always respect. In numerous countries of the Middle East there exists freedom of belief, while the space given to the freedom to practice religion is often quite limited. Increasing this space of freedom becomes essential to guarantee to all the members of the various religious communities the true freedom to live and profess their faith. This topic could become the subject of dialogue between Christians and Muslims, a dialogue whose urgency and usefulness was reiterated by the synodal fathers.

The pope made a plea for peace in the region, saying it was the best way to stop Christian emigration:

Conflicts, wars, violence and terrorism have gone on for too long in the Middle East. Peace, which is a gift of God, is also the result of the efforts of men of goodwill, of the national and international institutions, in particular of the states most involved in the search for a solution to conflicts. We must never resign ourselves to the absence of peace. Peace is possible. Peace is urgent. Peace is the indispensable condition for a life of dignity for human beings and society. Peace is also the best remedy to avoid emigration from the Middle East.

The Holy Father has for years been deeply concerned about the identity of Europe.

Posted in New Evangelization, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
6 Comments

POLL: Halloween costumes in church next Sunday at Mass

DO YOU HAVE A BLOG?  Please link!  Let’s get a strong participation in this poll and discussion.

A priest reader sent a suggestion for a WDTPRS POLL.

Next Sunday coincides with the Eve of All Hallows.  A “hallow” is an old word for “saint”.

For the sake of this poll, let’s consider dressing as saints for All Saints Day the same as Halloween costumes.  They both involve a costume and coming into church for Sunday Mass.

We will exclude “All Saints” parties held at the parish for children.  This is about coming to church for MASS on Sunday in a costume.

Chose your answer and then give your comments below.   For example, you might opine about whether costumes at Mass would be okay, or wicked, or just cute, or irreverent…

Next week we can have a followup poll to see what actually happened.

Knowing your parish as you do, do you expect children (or adults) will come to church for MASS on Sunday in Halloween costumes?

  • No, I don't think that will happen at my parish. (88%, 1,645 Votes)
  • Yes, I expect some people will show up in costumes. (12%, 223 Votes)

Total Voters: 1,868

Posted in POLLS | Tagged ,
51 Comments

QUAERITUR: Masses for dead Protestants

From a reader:

I was reading your post regarding “Masses for things instead of for people”. I remeber reading The Prophecies of Anne Catherine Emmerich, and reading this: ‘more Protestant souls stayed in Purgatory the longest not because they were worse than anyone else, but because so few people prayed for the repose of their souls or offered up Masses for their soul.’

Since both my parents were Protestant, would it be permissible to have a Mass said for them? I mentioned this to one priest who used to be at our parish and he didn’t seem too keen on the idea, although he never gave a direct ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

Yes!  It is not only permissible, it is laudable to pray for the dead, Catholic, non-Catholic, Christian, non-Christian.

It is a work of mercy to pray for the dead.

People don’t have to be Catholic for us to pray for them…. early and often.

Also, this is not about having a funeral for non-Catholics.  That is a different matter.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
38 Comments

QUAERITUR: Late evening Sunday Masses

From a reader:

Several churches in my area hold Sunday Mass in the evening, in addition to in the morning. Is it permissible to attend these Masses if we cannot make morning Mass, or is it even permissible to hold Mass on Sunday in the evening?

Yes, it is permissible to have Mass at any time of any day (except on Good Friday and the times of Mass on Holy Thursday and the Easter Vigil).

If the Mass is on a Sunday you fulfill your Mass obligation, even if it is in the evening, even until midnight.

That said, I don’t think it is a good idea to have lots of Masses in the evening on a Sunday.  Let Sunday be Sunday.  Let people go to Mass on Sunday morning and then give the rest of the day to good things people should do on Sundays.   I fear that these late Sunday Masses merely enable people to put off going to Mass because, in the morning there are “better” things to do.

And that said, yes, there are those situations in which a person may be genuinely impeded from going to Mass on Sunday morning.  That is why there is a Saturday vigil and sometimes late Sunday Masses.  Still, this should not be common.  That is my opinion.

Nevertheless, the Church’s law is very permissive in this regard and the faithful have the right to avail themselves of Masses at any time of the day or night.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
55 Comments

Body scanners unveiled at JFK Airport; Napolitano doesn’t volunteer

From the NY Daily News:

Body scanners unveiled at JFK Airport; Homeland Security Sect. Janet Napolitano doesn’t volunteer

BY Christina Boyle
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Airline passengers might want to consider a trip to the gym before heading to the airport now that high-tech body scanners have been unveiled at Kennedy Airport.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano yesterday hailed them as an important breakthrough for airport security and the fight against terrorism.

Yet when it came to testing the devices – which produce chalky, naked X-ray images of passengers – she turned the floor over to some brave volunteers. [For which I am sure we are grateful.]

“These machines represent an important way to stay ahead of the ever-evolving threat that faces the aviation industry,” Napolitano said.  [Gotta wonder about that.]

About 300 of the Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) machines are operational already at 62 airports across the country, and 450 will be in place by the end of the year, officials said.

JFK will have a “substantial” number, but officials would not reveal the exact figure.

Machines will be installed at Newark and LaGuardia airports within weeks. [Great.  Another terrorist driven industry.]

The machines work by projecting low-level X-ray beams at the passenger’s body to produce an image.

Any nonmetal objects hidden on the passenger’s body that wouldn’t be detected by the old-style scanners are easily spotted.

Going through one is optional for all travelers, but Napolitano hoped to ease any fears that airport staff would use them to leer at passengers.

“Those who read the images are not actually physically at the gate, so they cannot associate an image with an individual person at all,” she said.

“And the machines are set so that no image is retained.”

cboyle@nydailynews.com

Posted in Global Killer Asteroid Questions, Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
23 Comments

QUAERITUR: Masses for things instead of for people

From a reader:

Father, is it appropriate for a person to ask a priest to offer Mass for a non-human intention, like “for a bountiful harvest” or “for good weather”? Canon law says (c. 901) that a priest can offer Mass for anyone, living or dead, but it is also more general (c. 945 ff) in saying the priest can accept an offering to apply a Mass “for a specific intention.” I find it odd to hear an intention that is not directly for a person(s). But, is it ok? I know there are votive Masses for various needs. Perhaps that answers my question.

Yes, that answers your question.

Masses can be said for intentions that are not for humans, living or dead.  The intention can be in some way associated with, for example, the common good.  You pointed out that there are Votive Masses for various intentions.  Some of my favorites ar, in the 1962 Missale:

  • Mass in time of war
  • Mass for the forgiveness of sins
  • Mass for the grace of a good death
  • Mass for the preservation of ecclesiastical vocations
  • etc.

There are also some additional orations that can be added, such as:

  • to ask for rain
  • to ask for humilty
  • etc.

Of course all of these things come back to what we are asking God to grant to the living.

We can bring all our cares and needs to the altar.  The Church has Mass formularies for many occasions.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
10 Comments