Are Christ’s mission and Holy Church well-served by “me-tooism”?

My friend Fr. Tim Finigan, His Hermeueticalness, has written with a touch of irony about the recent launch of the Holy Father’s Twitter account, @pontifex.

Among Father’s observations is an amusing bit about how the Holy See’s explanatory announcement of this Twitter thing, bloggers such as he and I are referred to as “early adapters”.  Father also posts a photo of old bakelite sockets and plugs.  That in itself is reason enough to visit his blog and be amused.  He also added, correctly, that this move by the Holy See, and the measure of cooperation among different dicasteries, suggests that, finally, some in the Curia realize that they have to adapt or die.   To put it another way, it isn’t quite good enough to, as I have in the past sardonically described the Holy See’s approach to technology, “Update our equipment every 75 years, whether it needs it or not.”

This morning I was talking to a priest friend about the propriety/wisdom of the Holy Father having a Twitter account.

As you can by now tell, I have my reservations.

I focused on the question from the point that Tweeting seems – for a Pope – to be infra dignitatem.  At least right now.

Yes, yes.  I know all the points about St. Paul writing letters to communities and bishops using the Imperial postal system.  I know about stained-glass and the printing press and radio and all those other things.  I was the one who came up with the image of Christ being the first to use technology, to perform “on line ministry”, when he had Himself but let out on the water in a boat on the end of a line so that more people could hear him as the stood on the shore.   Yes, yes.  I know that.

But my friend raised a good point.

As we watch the hierarchy at home and abroad lurching around trying to figure out what to do in the face of social comms, are we not seeing one example of “me-tooism” after another?

“Hey!  Did you know that young people go to rock concerts!?!  Let’s have one too!”

The Holy See would do well to focus on a theology of communication.  

Christ is the Perfect Communicator (Communio et progressio, 11).   Let’s start there.

IDEA: Let the Social Communications types in the Curia sponsor another meeting in Rome for bloggers and bring in people to talk about a theology of communication.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Benedict XVI, Brick by Brick, Linking Back, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
36 Comments

2013 Comet to be a “once in a civilization” event?

A reader alerted me to this from Scientific American:

Next year’s “brightest comet in modern times” to be “once in a civilization” event

As it flares out of the distant Oort Cloud, the newly discovered comet C/2012 S1 (ISON) appears to be heading on a trajectory that could make for one of the most spectacular night-sky events in living memory. Why is this comet expected to be so unique? Two reasons:

Astronomers predict that the comet will pass just 1.16 million miles from the Sun as it swings around its perihelion, or closest approach. (This may seem like a lot, but remember – the Sun is big. If we were to scale the Sun down to the size of Earth, the comet would pass well within the orbits of dozens of satellites.) The close approach will melt enormous amounts of the comet’s ice, releasing dust and gas and forming what should be a magnificent tail.

After it loops around the Sun and forms this tail, the comet should then pass relatively close to Earth – not near enough to cause any worry, but close enough to put on a great show. Viewers in the Northern Hemisphere will get the best view as the comet blooms in the weeks approaching Christmas 2013. The comet could grow as bright as the full moon.

Of course, comets have a habit of not living up to expectations. This one could be sucked into the Sun during its close approach, or not grow as much of a tail as astronomers hope.

But that hasn’t dampened enthusiasm for what Astronomy Now is awkwardly calling “a once-in-a-civilisation’s-lifetime” event.
The comet expert John E. Bortle is already comparing ISON with the Great Comet of 1680, which, according to contemporary accounts, caused the people of New York’s Manhattan Island to be “overcome with terror at a sight in the heavens such as has seldom greeted human eyes…. In the province of New York a day of fasting and humiliation was appointed, in order that the wrath of God might be assuaged.”  [We could use a little more of that, frankly.]

[…]

The piece goes on to quote another author:

The Dutch and Quaker Colonies in America by John Fiske

Chapter XI, ‘New York in the Year 1680’

Late in the autumn of 1680 the good people of Manhattan were overcome with terror at a sight in the heavens such as has seldom greeted human eyes. An enormous comet, perhaps the most magnificent one on record, suddenly made its appearance. At first it was tailless and dim, like a nebulous cloud, but at the end of a week the tail began to show itself and in a second week had attained a length of 30 degrees; in the third week it extended to 70 degrees, while the whole mass was growing brighter. After five weeks it seemed to be absorbed into the intense glare of the sun, but in four days more it reappeared like a blazing sun itself in the throes of some giant convulsion and threw out a tail in the opposite direction as far as the whole distance between the sun and the earth. Sir Isaac Newton, who was then at work upon the mighty problems soon to be published to the world in his Principia, welcomed this strange visitor as affording him a beautiful instance for testing the truth of his new theory of gravitation. But most people throughout the civilized world, the learned as well as the multitude, feared that the end of all things was at hand. Every church in Europe, from the grandest cathedral to the humblest chapel, resounded with supplications, and in the province of New York a day of fasting and humiliation was appointed,in order that the wrath of God might be assuaged.  [Like I said, above, we could use more of that all the time and not just in moments of crisis.]

Posted in Global Killer Asteroid Questions, Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , , , ,
6 Comments

Maternal Lunch

I am having lunch in NYC… with my mother, who happens to be here.

20121203-125700.jpg

20121203-125706.jpg
UPDATE:
After an afternoon at MoMA we really needed a drink.

20121203-163033.jpg
UPDATE:
The wrap…

20121203-223809.jpg

20121203-223818.jpg

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
32 Comments

@Pontifex

The Holy Father’s new Twitter account is up and running: @Pontifex

He has not tweeted anything yet, at the time of this writing.

From VIS:

The Pope’s presence on Twitter is a concrete expression of his conviction that the Church must be present in the digital arena. This initiative is best understood in the context of his reflections on the importance of the cultural space that has been brought into being by the new technologies. In his Message for World Communications Day 2009, which was published on the same day as the Vatican’s Youtube channel was opened, Pope Benedict spoke of the necessity of evangelizing the ‘digital continent’ and he invited young believers, in particular, to introduce into the culture of this new environment of communications and information technology the values on which you have built your lives.

In 2010, he invited priests to see the possibility of sharing the Word of God through their engagement with new media: the new media offer ever new and far-reaching pastoral possibilities, encouraging them to embody the universality of the Church’s mission, to build a vast and real fellowship, and to testify in today’s world to the new life which comes from hearing the Gospel of Jesus, the eternal Son who came among us for our salvation. In his Message for 2011, he specified that: The web is contributing to the development of new and more complex intellectual and spiritual horizons, new forms of shared awareness. In this field too we are called to proclaim our faith that Christ is God, the Saviour of humanity and of history, the one in whom all things find their fulfilment (cf. Eph 1:10). In this year’s Message, the Holy Father was even more precise: Attention should be paid to the various types of websites, applications and social networks which can help people today to find time for reflection and authentic questioning, as well as making space for silence and occasions for prayer, meditation or sharing of the word of God. In concise phrases, often no longer than a verse from the Bible, profound thoughts can be communicated, as long as those taking part in the conversation do not neglect to cultivate their own inner lives.

The Pope’s presence on Twitter can be seen as the ‘tip of the iceberg’ that is the Church’s presence in the world of new media. The Church is already richly present in this environment – there exist a whole range of initiatives from the official websites of various institutions and communities to the personal sites, blogs and micro-blogs of public church figures and of individual believers. The Pope’s presence in Twitter is ultimately an endorsement of the efforts of these ‘early adapters’ to ensure that the Good News of Jesus Christ and the teaching of his Church is permeating the forum of exchange and dialogue that is being created by social media. His presence is intended to be an encouragement to all Church institutions and people of faith to be attentive to develop an appropriate profile for themselves and their convictions in the ‘digital continent’. The Pope’s tweets will be available to believers and non-believers to share, discuss and to encourage dialogue. It is hoped that the Pope’s short messages, and the fuller messages that they seek to encapsulate, will give rise to questions for people from different countries, languages and cultures. These questions can in turn be engaged by local Church leaders and believers who will be best positioned to address the questions and, more importantly, to be close to those who question. Amid the complexity and diversity of the world of communications, however, many people find themselves confronted with the ultimate questions of human existence: Who am I? What can I know? What ought I to do? What may I hope? It is important to affirm those who ask these questions, and to open up the possibility of a profound dialogue (Communications Day Message, 2012).

Part of the challenge for the Church in the area of new media is to establish a networked or capillary presence that can effectively engage the debates, discussions and dialogues that are facilitated by social media and that invite direct, personal and timely responses of a type that are not so easily achieved by centralized institutions. Moreover, such a networked or capillary structure reflects the truth of the Church as a community of communities which is alive both universally and locally. The Pope’s presence in Twitter will represent his voice as a voice of unity and leadership for the Church but it will also be a powerful invitation to all believers to express their ‘voices’, to engage their ‘followers’ and ‘friends’ and to share with them the hope of the Gospel that speaks of God’s unconditional love for all men and women.

In addition to the direct engagement with the questions, debates and discussions of people that is facilitated by new media, the Church recognizes the importance of new media as an environment that allows to teach the truth that the Lord has passed to His Church, to listen to others, to learn about their cares and concerns, to understand who they are and for what they are searching. When messages and information are plentiful, silence becomes essential if we are to distinguish what is important from what is insignificant or secondary. Deeper reflection helps us to discover the links between events that at first sight seem unconnected, to make evaluations, to analyze messages; this makes it possible to share thoughtful and relevant opinions, giving rise to an authentic body of shared knowledge (Message, 2012). It is for this reason that it has been decided to launch the Pope’s Twitter channel with a formal question and answer format. This launch is also an indication of the importance that the Church gives to listening and is a warranty of its ongoing attentiveness to the conversations, commentaries and trends that express so spontaneously and insistently the preoccupations and hopes of people.

[01618-02.01] [Original text: English]

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Benedict XVI | Tagged , , ,
22 Comments

Guest Post: First TLM report

This came by email:

I’m a college student in Dubuque, Iowa (Loras College if you’ve heard of it) and after growing up on the Novus Ordo I thought it would be
interesting to go to a Latin Mass. I found one in Dyersville, IA (Field of
Dreams location!) at St. Francis Xavier Basillica. I went this afternoon and was blown away.

The beauty of the church hit me as soon as I walked in – though I’d been
there once before I still was struck speechless. I have attached a few
pictures of the side altars and the magnificent baldachinno I know you
love. A few people trickled in (I figured there would have been more, (sadly I would only say 25-30 people were in attendance, I expected more) but as Mass started I could just feel a sense of reverence I had only ever felt on rare visits to the Cathedral of St. Paul back home. Although it wasn’t a solemn high Mass (the handy dandy book I received with responses informed me how to tell the difference) the music of the cantor combined with the elderly priest blew me away. The priest’s homily was so more deep than the average sermon, and the silent beauty of the Eucharistic prayer had me in total adoration. I walked out of that Basilica a person who can’t wait to go to another Tridentine Mass, with even more appreciation of the Church. This experienced touched me in a deep way. Every Catholic should go to one.

Posted in HONORED GUESTS, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
34 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a great point… even just a good point… from the sermon you heard for your Sunday Mass?

Let us know what it was.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
47 Comments

Question to readers: RSS feed problem?

Is anyone having a problem with the blog’s RSS feed?

A couple people have written about it, by I am not seeing the trouble.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
15 Comments

WDTPRS: 1st Sunday of Advent: Prayer over the Offerings

The Lord’s Coming is a fearful thing to ponder.  The First Coming of the Lord, prophesied by Jeremiah in Sunday’s 1st Reading, and His Sacrifice renewed daily on our altars, mean that His Second Coming, described by the Lord in the Gospel reading from Luke 21, and our impending judgment need not raze the thoughtful soul in abject terror.  During the offertory of Mass the priest, on our behalf, raises to God the elements to be consecrated together with all our gifts of praise and prayers of need.  We seek to please and to appease God, whom we rejected by our sins.

The Prayer over the Offerings for this 2nd Sunday of Advent is the Secret for this same Sunday in older, traditional form of the Roman Rite. If the ancient, elegant sound of this prayer made you think that it was in Gelasian Sacramentary you were right on target.

Placare, Domine, quaesumus, nostrae precibus humilitatis et hostiis, et, ubi nulla suppetunt suffragia meritorum tuae nobis indulgentiae succurre praesidiis.

Succurro means “to run or hasten to aid”.  Its root curro, “to run”, lends succurro an element of haste, which is a theme in the prayers of Advent.  Placare looks like an infinitive but it is actually the passive imperative of placo, “to reconcile” and also “to soothe, assuage, appease”.  Think of English “placate.”  Suppeto is “to be sufficient for”.  A suffragium is “a voting tablet” and, therefore, “a vote, voice, suffrage” (as in “suffragettes”, who wanted voting rights for women).  It is also “a favorable decision, assent, approbation, applause.”  In ecclesiastical lingo a “suffrage” is a recommendation or intercessory prayer as, for example, when pray for the Poor Souls in Purgatory.  Plural suffragia means something like “points in our favor”.  Unless Christ makes our works His own we have no good marks (nulla meritorum suffragia) on our side of the merit column.

LITERAL VERSION:

Be appeased, O Lord, we beseech You, by the prayers of our humility and by our sacrificial offerings, and, where no favorable points of merits suffice for us, succor us by the helps of Your indulgence.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Lord, we are nothing without you. As you sustain us with your mercy, receive our prayers and offerings.

Wow.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

Be pleased, O Lord, with our humble prayers and offerings, and, since we have no merits to plead our cause, come, we pray, to our rescue.

This prayer reminds us that we are going to receive God’s justice whether we want it or not.  We beg, therefore, His mercy.  Our Lord will always show us love and mercy, but we have to ask for it.  Never presume you have forgiveness and mercy.  Ask for it and then do penance.

We can get lazy about God and assume He is automatically pleased with us all the time.  But we are not robotically forgiven for our transgressions and omissions.  We must ask for and obtain God’s mercy and then attend to justice and do penance.  Nothing we do on our own merits the great gift of redemption (cf CCC 2007).  It’s all gift.  We are saved solely by the merits of Christ’s Sacrifice.

We will see in weeks to come that a constant feature of the Latin Prayer over the Offerings is the desire to appease God.  “Appease” is not a fashionable word for us sophisticated moderns.  But there it is.  What we pray has a reciprocal relationship with what we believe. We must also appease God while we petition and praise.  The Lord’s appeasing Sacrifice on Calvary, renewed on our altars, is our lifeline.

Above, I used the phrase “favorable points of merits”. Never imagine God as a celestial accountant keeping books on what we do or haven’t done.  Salvation is not based on a ledger’s bottom line.  In our personal and then final judgment God will show us what our good works merited and how they balance against our sins.   Until then, it’s a great mystery.  In fact, the Church now hazards to offer indications of only “partial” or “full” indulgences for works we perform.  The only thing we can be sure of is that we must not be lax or presumptuous.

If we want salvation, we appease God by our prayers, works and sacrifices, all of which must be joined to Christ’s Sacrifice.  At Holy Mass join all that you do and are and love and need to the propitiatory Sacrifice renewed by the priest.  Father raises the paten with host. He raises the chalice of wine with blended drops of water, symbolizing our little humanity being taken up by Christ with His divinity.  Place yourselves and your needs in that chalice, like those drops, and on that paten, like that pure host, to be transformed.

Posted in Four Last Things, WDTPRS | Tagged , ,
3 Comments

Of the Vatican and Merry-Go-Rounds. No… really…

I am not a fan of huge outdoor Masses, even… especially… in St. Peter’s Square… which is a parking lot.

Today, however, it is more than a parking lot.

I am not making this up.

You can’t make this up.

There is a carnival ride set up in St. Peter’s Square. You can view cams HERE.

And….

My mind is spinning with quips about the Curia and the Merry-Go-Round.

UPDATE

In related news, the Holy Father has his annual meeting with members of the Roman Curia:

All in all, it seemed to go pretty well.  Business as usual.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
39 Comments

From the Archive: Priest refuses to use new translation in consecration of Precious Blood. Invalid?

FROM THE ARCHIVE. (Since a couple people have recently asked about this through email.)

From a reader:

If I had to guess, there are probably many priests throughout the US who are refusing to celebrate the Mass according to the new translation.

My question is, “Is the Mass invalid if a priest uses the old words of consecration?” I am sure we can all agree that it would be illicit, but is it invalid? I am asking this because I am wondering what I should do if I encounter a Mass where the priest uses the old translation.

The consecration is NOT invalid if the priest uses the obsolete, incorrect words for the consecration as they were in the obsolete, incorrect and now illicit-to-use old ICEL version.  If the priest says, for example the incorrect and now illicit, “for all”, purposely, he is probably committing a sin if he is doing so out of contempt for authority and because he thinks he knows better.  It would, nevertheless, be a valid consecration.

What should you do?

If you are just dropping by that parish and you don’t have regular ties there, think twice before doing something.  You are not there often enough to know if the priest is simply making a mistake because of an old habit – it happens! – or whether he is defying the Church’s authority and causing scandal at the most solemn moment of Holy Mass.

If are at your regular parish, then I suggest you consult my tips for writing to bishops or offices of the Holy See.

I suggest, first, a conversation with the priest if possible.  Then follow up that conversation with a writing letter about what was said.  If that doesn’t bear fruit, then send copies to the local bishop.  If that doesn’t bear fruit, send copies to the Congregation for Divine Worship in Rome.  I think it is always best to work on these things at the lowest possible level of authority, (parish – diocese – congregation).  The same applies if the priest is a member of a religious order in one of their chapels or churches or institutions.

At the end of Redemptionis Sacramentum we read:

6. Complaints Regarding Abuses in Liturgical Matters

[183.] In an altogether particular manner, let everyone do all that is in their power to ensure that the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist will be protected from any and every irreverence or distortion and that all abuses be thoroughly corrected. This is a most serious duty incumbent upon each and every one, and all are bound to carry it out without any favouritism.[184.] Any Catholic, whether Priest or Deacon or lay member of Christ’s faithful, has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan Bishop or the competent Ordinary equivalent to him in law, or to the Apostolic See on account of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff. It is fitting, however, insofar as possible, that the report or complaint be submitted first to the diocesan Bishop. This is naturally to be done in truth and charity.

Again, priests can slip up out of habit.  I knew a priest who – once in a while  – used to say “Paul, our Pope” during the Canon… in the ’90’s!  Words repeated every day of a priest’s life can become ingrained and pop out unexpectedly.  If a priest is doing something all the time, that is another issue.

But if he slips here and there, cut him a little slack.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , , , , ,
24 Comments