WDTPRS – 8th Sunday after Pentecost – living right

The Collect for Mass and the Office for this upcoming 8th Sunday after Pentecost is found in the ancient Veronese Sacramentary and the Gelasian and the so-called Gregorian. It survived the liturgical snipper with their scissors and paste pots to live on in the post-Conciliar Missale Romanum on Thursday of the 1st week of Lent. However, there is a minor adjustment in the Novus Ordo version.

Let’s drill into what our prayer really says.

COLLECT (1962MR)

Largire nobis, quaesumus, Domine, semper spiritum
cogitandi quae recta sunt,
propitius et agendi:
ut, qui sine te esse non possumus,
secundum te vivere valeamus
.

In the Novus Ordo version that oddly placed propitius (“propitiously”) is replaced by promptius (“more readily/openly”). In the critical edition of the ancient Veronese Sacramentary, you find promptius. The reformers preferred the version that pre-dated the “Tridentine” editio princeps of 1570. What happened? Probably some ancient copyist made a mistake in reading an old manuscript’s ink squiggles in – mpt – and – pit -. Easy to do.  Why the reversion was thought necessary, after having prayed the perfectly good collect for so many centuries, beats me.   I’m not sure that, as the Council Fathers commanded, the good of the Church “genuinely and certainly” required it (Sacrosanctum Concilium 23).

One meaning of secundum in the prestigious Lewis & Short Dictionary is “agreeably to, in accordance with, according to”. Remember that largire is an imperative of a deponent verb, not an infinitive. The famous verb cogito is more than simply “to think”. It reflects deeper reflection, true pursuit in the mind: “to consider thoroughly, to ponder, to weigh, reflect upon, think”.

LITERAL ATTEMPT

We beg you, O Lord, bestow upon us propitiously the spirit
of thinking always things which are correct,
and of carrying them out,
so that we who are not able to exist without You
may be able to live according to Your will
.

In my peregrinations though the writings of St. Augustine of Hippo (+430) I found a text which harks to at least part of the content of this prayer (In io. eu. tr. 51,3):

“For Christ, who humbled Himself, made obedient unto death, even the death of the Cross, is the teacher of humility. When He teaches us humility He doesn’t thus let go of His divinity: for in it (His divinity) He is the equal of the Father, while in this (His humility) He is like unto us; and in that He is the Father’s equal He created us in order that we might exist; and in that He is like to us, He redeemed us so that we would not perish.”

In Acts 17:28, we read about our God, “in whom we live and move and have our being”, a concept perhaps influenced by the legendary Epimenides of Knossos (6th c?).   He was a Cretan, of course, and is famous for the paradoxical “All Cretans are liars.”  Today, we might update that by having, say, a famous Jesuit say… wellll…. never mind.  St. Paul seems to have known the Epimenides Paradox.  In Titus, he writes:

For there are many insubordinate men, empty talkers and deceivers, especially the circumcision party; 11 they must be silenced, since they are upsetting whole families by teaching for base gain what they have no right to teach. 12 One of themselves, a prophet of their own, said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.” 13 This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith, 14 instead of giving heed to Jewish myths or to commands of men who reject the truth. 15 To the pure all things are pure, but to the corrupt and unbelieving nothing is pure; their very minds and consciences are corrupted. 16 They profess to know God, but they deny him by their deeds; they are detestable, disobedient, unfit for any good deed.

Moving on from the Jesuits, and back to our prayer….

We are made to act as God acts: to know, will and love.

When we cleave to God, seeking what is good and true and beautiful through the tangle of our wounded intellect, we are really seeking God.

Once we know what is good, true and beautiful, either because we reasoned to it or perhaps an authority helped us, then we must act in accordance with the good, truth and beauty we found.

Today we pray to God in our Collect to give us the actual graces we need in order to live properly according to His image within us.

We are even more ourselves, even freer when, eschewing our own errant wills, we embrace the One who is Goodness, Truth and Beauty.

Yet there are times when we purposely (and thereafter habitually) choose against what reason and authority point to as the Good, True and Beautiful. We make the choice to stray and sin. In doing so we diminish ourselves. After all, we have our very existence from the One whom we choose to defy. We must return to the correct path, as Dante did in his Divine Comedy. His fictional self strayed into the dark woods after leaving the path of the right reason.

We could so often avoid sin if we would just act readily on those impulses of our minds and consciences toward what is good and true and beautiful. In a way, the phrase of the Nike commercial (níke means “victory” in ancient Greek) sums it up: Just Do It. And we have many helps in discerning the good, especially in the authoritative teachings of the Church. Over time we build up good habits of acting at the right time and measure, so that we have the habits that are virtues.

A problem rises when circumstances and our passions confuse us and we must ponder to discern the correct path. Most of the time we get ourselves into trouble by hesitating about doing what we know is right. We mull, dawdle, pick and get ourselves into a hornet nest of problems.

Strive, in accord with a conscience formed by the Church’s teachings and according to common sense, after the good, true and beautiful, which are ultimately reflects of God.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1660 – A day that will live in INFAMY

Today is the anniversary of several notable events. The most noteworthy, according to me, are the following.

It is the anniversary of St. Simon Stock’s vision of Mary in 1251, hence it is the Feast of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel.

In 1969 Apollo 11 lifted off.

In 1970 Fischer with black beat Spassky in Game 3.

In 2021, based partly on a lie about a results of a survey of bishops, the cruel Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes was promulgated along with a letter to Catholic Bishops. It was, and still is, a black mark in the Church’s pastoral mission procuring repeated blows by bishops and the dicastery on the already bruised people of God. Pray regularly, please, a Memorare for its abrogation.

Welcome registrant:

DanShell

A word of thanks is due to several of you readers who have sent me items from my wish list.  Alas, more and more often it seems there are no “gift slips” included, which means that I don’t know who sent what and I have no way to write a note of thanks.  Just recently I received a couple of brass candle “followers” that are the correct size for some altar candles which another reader sent.  Also, I received a book about an interested historical person in New York and some – yum – beef jerky.  THAT was a real help during my recent travel misadventures and misconnection.  I had tucked a pouch into my backpack before sallying forth into the unknown and therefore had something to eat when I got stuck in ATL after everything was closed.  I have some wonderful San Marzano tomatoes and some chess puzzles, wonderful hot chili oil, etc.  Also, I’m taking my desktop to an expert to clone my c: drive to a very much larger SSD.  One of you sent my the drive.  I tried to do it myself, but it didn’t work.  I need help with it.  It’ll cost not nothing, but it will be worth it.  My point is, thank you, all of you for being so good to me.  I pray for my benefactors and regularly (every Sunday now – more often when I’m in Rome) say Mass for you.  It is my pleasure and duty.

Another note.  I’ll be updating the “mom’s stuff” page shortly.   And a couple of you reached out to acquire some things.  I’m on it.

Meanwhile…

At Infovaticana we read:

A group of laypeople has founded the association Pro Fide Ecclesiae, in Germany, a new movement that seeks to give voice to Catholics who do not feel represented by the Central Committee of German Catholics (ZdK) or heard by the German Bishops’ Conference (DBK). According to Kath.net, the initiative was established last Sunday in Offenbach am Main and counts among its founding members the emeritus bishop of Chur, Marian Eleganti, one of the most critical voices regarding the German Synodal Way.

The promoters of the association maintain that there is a broad sector of “conservative in values” faithful who remain loyal to the Church’s magisterium and who have been excluded from ecclesial debate in Germany. Although they assert that these Catholics are not a minority in the parishes, they denounce that they have become practically invisible in official dialogue and media coverage.

A lay movement in defense of the magisterium
Pro Fide Ecclesiae defines itself canonically as a lay movement, inspired by the conciliar decree Apostolicam Actuositatem on the apostolate of the laity, although it is also open to priests and other members of the clergy.

Its main objective is to strengthen the Catholic faith and promote firm adherence to the Church’s magisterium, as well as to establish links with other associations of the faithful that share the same orientation.

Among the founders is Bishop Marian Eleganti, who summarized the purpose of the initiative with a forceful statement: “We want to defend the faith against heretical interpretations and falsifications”.

HA!

Black to move. Mate in …?

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
32 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1659 – GO TO CONFESSION (says the Jesuit)

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

 

Black to move. Mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Also, I note with interest the pastoral letters issued by some bishops about the SSPX situation.  I mentioned the other day that I was please that a bishop openly said that he would be willing to talk to any SSPX priest who would approach him.  Some one sent me a note with letters from other bishops. Caggiano of Bridgeport makes an inviting appeal.  Burbidge of Arlington refers to his “brother priests” though he doesn’t explicit invite them.  Lucia of Syracuse, on the other hand, wrote a rather harsh letter, and seems to go a bit beyond what the Holy See so ineptly indicated about frequenting SSPX chapels.  He suggests that going to a SSPX chapel after reading his letter – even once – would be formal adherence to schism.  That can’t be, of course, but that’s the take away.   Moreover, they all repeat the claim the SSPX absolutions are now invalid.  They get that from the “Explanatory Note”.  The problem I see with that is that there is no clear legitimate statement that Leo XIV removed the faculty.  The Dicastery can’t do it without Leo.

And from my friend Fr. McTeigue:

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
16 Comments

ALERT: The SSPX appeals against the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith

I was just alerted to this at Rorate.  I am glad to read this.  On the other hand, it might not go the way one might hope for.

The Society of Saint Pius X  (SSPX) filed an appeal against the decisions of the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) — a canonical possibility which we mentioned here the day following its publication.

Here is the Communiqué of the SSPX General House:

Communiqué of 13 July 2026.

The Society of Saint Pius X announces that, in response to the decree issued on 2 July 2026 by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, it submitted on 11 July a preliminary recourse to the same Dicastery, in accordance with canons 1734 and following of the Code of Canon Law.

This request, which constitutes the mandatory preliminary step before the possible introduction of a hierarchical recourse, has the effect of suspending the execution of the decree, in accordance with canon 1353 of the Code of Canon Law.

By this recourse, the Society intends to exercise the right which the Church recognizes to any person who considers himself harmed by an administrative act to seek its correction, in a spirit of respect for ecclesiastical authority and of faithful attachment to justice, truth and the good of the Church.

The Society of Saint Pius X entrusts this request to the competent authorities and commends this undertaking to the prayers of all the faithful.

Menzingen, 13 July 2026

Posted in SSPX | Tagged
21 Comments

Mass this afternoon – Unity of the Church… differently

Today at 1700 EDT I will say a Votive Mass “for the unity of the Church”, once called “ad tollendum schisma”.

Deus, qui errata córrigis,
et dispérsa cóngregas, et congregáta consérvas:
qu?sumus, super pópulum christiánum tuæ uniónis grátiam cleménter infúnde;
ut, divisióne rejécta, vero pastóri Ecclésiæ tuæ se úniens,
tibi digne váleat famulári.

O God, who settest straight what has gone astray,
and gatherest together what is scattered, and keepest what Thou hast gathered together:
we beseech Thee in Thy mercy to pour down on Christian people the grace of union with Thee,
that, putting disunion aside and joining themselves to the true Shepherd of Thy Church,
they may be able to render Thee worthy service.

Some will immediately think that this is aimed at the SSPX situation. While it is that, it is even more aimed at those who are clearly out of step with the Holy Catholic Church while still formally belonging to her. Those who tear at the unity of the Church through their ambiguous or heretical teaching, their twisted liturgical choices, their antinomialist anarchotyranny, their petty backbiting bullying and abuse of authority. These are the true underminers of the unity of the Church, not those who strive to preserve Tradition.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1658

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Good news and bad news all at once…. According to Infovaticana, the North American Jesuits are reducing their novitiate locations from five to two. The two new novitiates will be located in Detroit (Michigan) and Culver City (California). Go woke. Go broke. And they are just about bankkrupt. I feel badly for the really great Jesuits who are trapped in that mess.

I simply must…

Black to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

My View For Awhile: homeward – CONCLUSION

Excitement… I got a note from Delta that my flight was delayed out of Philadelphia and I would not make my connection. I got on the computer and found an earlier flight which had been delayed since 0900! Hence, a rush to the airport in sort of awful conditions.

Sheets of rain. Still, they are telling us that we are going to leave.

The drive from the conference back to Philly was lovely. Lots of hills and lush green. Great cars, too.

When we got in and cleaned up, it was off to the Union League Club to meet priests for supper. Wonderful time.

That was just to start.

I’ll try to update along the way if my phone will cooperate.

UPDATE

After ANOTHER delay we are on board abd so is my bag.   What will happen next is anybody’s guess.

Now there is a fuel truck.

From what i can tell there was a problem with the original plane which is why this flight was originally at 0900.

They keep whittling away at my layover in ATL.

Onboard chess game is not very good.

More later.

UPDATE

AN HOUR LATER AND WE ARE STILL ON THE GROUND IN PHL

Will this trip never end?

Even if we can get on the way shortly. I don’t know about the connection.

UPDATE

They … damn … it’s complicated but I’m going to be stuck in Atlanta.

I sense a hotel in my future.

UPDATE 13 July

I got home eventually.   There were delays of weather.  They took us out to the runway, and then there was an engine issue and brought us back, half deplaned, then they changed their minds.  Meanwhile, seeing how this was going to go, I got with the gate agent and provisionally added a flight from ATL for the next morning. There was one slot. If I wouldn’t get that, I’d have to wait until Tuesday.

Very late, they took us to ATL.  On the place I booked a hotel room.  I got to get some sleep for about $60/hour.  That stings.

In the morning, off to ATL and breakfast in the lounge.   Everything went smoothly, except there was no trace of by bag.  I called the “medalion line”.  Zip.   On the ground, however, I got a text that my bag was delivered to my destinations baggage carousel at 02:30 AM.  Then I got a text that it was in the baggage service office.  Sure enough.   That means, I think that the final leg of my trip may have left at 01:00 plus change, but there were no boarding texts.  I guess they just flew the plane down because it was needed there in the morning.  I dunno.

That’s that.

Some images along the way.

Posted in On the road |
12 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 26-06-23 – Toupee or not toupee

June 23rd 2026

Dear Diary,

I’m still worn out from the meeting in Orlando.  Damn its hot and humid there, not that I was out much.  Still, all that time with endless talking, blah blah.  The consecration thing was okay, but didn’t we do that before sometime?

Visited St. Mildred’s in Bellwether for the parish anniversary. Good lunch. Baked ham, potatoes with cheese, and three kinds of pie. I only tried two. Discipline.

Before Mass, three people asked me who the “new second priest” was. I told them I hadn’t sent anyone new and wondered what the VG had done without telling me. Again.  Or maybe it was just a visitor?    No, they said, he’s been here for several weeks.  Decent guy, bald, glasses.  Does pretty much everything Fr. Kevin does.  They ment Kevin Muldoon.

Apparently the bald priest with glasses says the early Mass they just put on the schedule a while ago, especially for farmers and farm workers. Then, at the afternoon Mass, Fr. Kevin shows up.  The new priest used the same vestments as Fr. Kevin. Same voice. Same homily, even same joke about the collection. Nobody knew his name. One lady thought he was a visiting mission preacher. Another said the two priests were brothers.

I asked Msgr. Tommy to investigate when he was at the chancery for something.  We had lunch… Montecristo sandwiches. He stared at me for a long time and said, “It’s Fr. Kevin.”

“Which one?”  “Both.”

Turns out Kevin is bald and he wears contacts.  Who knew?  In the morning he doesn’t bother with the rug and just wears his glasses.  After the morning Mass he puts on a toupay. Tommy says he calls it “pastoral presentation” and it seems that the rug cost $1800 from some place in Chicago and that Kevin had the parish pay for it under evangelization expenses.   I said that sounds creative. Tommy said it sounds like fraud.

Now that the word is getting out some wise guys at St, Mildred are requesting bulletin photographs for both priests. A guy on the parish council wants to call the early one “Father Kevin” and the later one “Father Kev.”

I suggested to Kevin that he has to pick one appearance. He asked which one. I said “whichever gets fewer complaints”.

Note: ask Finance if we can expense hair.  I could get a rug – or some patches – for Chester.

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged ,
5 Comments

Archbp. of Milwaukee reacts to the SSPX consecrations. Fr Z comments.

One bishop after another are issuing letters to their flocks in the wake of the SSPX episcopal consecrations.  Uniformly, they repeat a factual error in the “Explanatory Note” about the faculties of the SSPX to receive sacramental confessions and validly absolve.   In sum: since a Pope gave the faculty, a Pope has to remove it.  Also, the “Explanatory Note” doesn’t have any juridical force.

Error aside, there is something good in this letter for Milwaukee.

Here is the text of Archbp. Grob’s letter.  My emphases and comments.


Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

On July 1, 2026, bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) consecrated four priests as bishops without the mandate of the Holy Father and against his expressed will. On July 2, the Holy See declared that the bishops who carried out these consecrations and those who received them committed schismatic acts and incurred automatic excommunication. This is a sorrowful moment for the whole Church, and I share that sorrow with you.

I write to you today because this decision by the Society’s leadership has legitimate consequences for the faithful of this local church, especially for the faithful who have worshipped at St. Pius V Chapel in Mukwonago.

To state those consequences plainly, know first that the Holy See has declared that the clerics of the Society now administer the sacraments illicitly, and, that the confessions they hear and the marriages at which they assist are invalid. [It is hard to imagine that bishops will want to grant delegation for marriages now that this has happened, but, again, this is something that Francis gave, not the Dicastery.  If you accept that Francis was Pope  – some people don’t think he was but I suspect most American bishops do – then we have to have clarity about the issue of valid confessions and marriages.  This next part…] Anyone with questions about a marriage already celebrated, or about any particular situation, is welcome to contact the Chancery or the Metropolitan Tribunal, and they will help you. [This is very good.  This is an invitation to those who may have doubts, offering a route to clarity about the status of their marriage and a path towards regularization.]

Furthermore, to those who have attended the liturgies of the Society of St. Pius X, let me also offer a word of reassurance. The Holy See itself has made clear that this excommunication does not fall upon those who attended these liturgies simply out of love for the sacred liturgy, and who have never rejected the Holy Father or the teaching of the Church. I know that this describes many of you and of the strength of your families, your reverence, and the seriousness with which you pass on the faith to your children. However, knowing the situation as it now stands, such persons must simply resolve not to continue to participate in future SSPX sacramental worship or pastoral ministry.  [It’s a little more complicated than that.  There are reasons provided for in law by which people might be able to frequent Masses of SSPX chapels.  What is necessary is that people not attend them out of a schismatic motive.]

Furthermore, I would remind the faithful of our local church that the Mass celebrated according to the 1962 Missal, is offered in full communion with the Church here throughout this Archdiocese at multiple locations. I would especially highlight the reverent sacramental care provided at St. Stanislaus Oratory in Milwaukee, where the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest offers the traditional Latin Mass and sacraments each day.  [Channeling our inner Oliver, please, Archbishop, may we have some more? Note this next part…]

To any priest of the Society who is weighing what these events mean for his priesthood, know that the Holy See has established a path for your reconciliation, and that I will receive any such request with what the Holy See itself has asked of me: through listening and cordial availability, remaining especially mindful of the human and spiritual weight such a decision carries.  [I think this is terrific.  I haven’t yet seen anything like this in the letters of other bishops.  Please, dear readers, if you know of another, please let me know.   The Archbishop has offered an open door, at least for … something.  Would that more bishops were this open.  I hope that that “human and spiritual weight” part means that he knows that these priests will not want to use the Novus Ordo. I am minded of “back in the day” when it was desperately hard for SSPX priests to find a bishop.  I remember several cases, both sad and also joyful.  What I would also like to see – PLEASE GOD – bishops who don’t just say, “okay you can come, I guess”, but perhaps to reach out and invite priests.  And this extends beyond the SSPX.  There are any number of priests who have been cancelled or semi-cancelled, who are perfectly sound but their bishops won’t treat them with decency because they are too “traditional”.  What I would like to hear, and frankly despair of hearing is not “okay, I guess you can come”, but rather, “Please, do come.”  That makes all the difference.]

The Church has labored for decades toward the full reconciliation of the Society, under St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV. That labor has been gravely harmed by the acts of July 1, but the Church does not stop praying for unity, because Christ Himself prayed for it on the night before He died, that they may all be one (John 17:20-23). [Prayer is great.  However, as in our individual lives, we need concrete deeds as well.  Otherwise, the intention seems a little vaporous.]

I entrust all those affected by this moment to the intercession of Our Lady, Mother of the Church, and I assure you of my prayers,

Yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Jeffrey S. Grob
Archbishop of Milwaukee

Posted in SSPX | Tagged ,
11 Comments

WDTPRS – 7th Sunday after Pentecost: God can neither deceive nor be deceived

In the traditional Roman calendar this Sunday is the 7th Sunday after Pentecost.

Today’s Collect survived the cutting and pasting experts of the Consilium to live on as the Collect for the 9th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

COLLECT (1962MR):

Deus, cuius providentia in sui dispositione non fallitur
te supplices exoramus,
ut noxia cuncta submoveas,
et omnia nobis profutura concedas
.

Note the use of the trop homoioteleuton (same ending in corresponding elements) in submoveas and concedas.  The last two clauses, cola, both have preposition prefixes and the structure is the same.

Blaise/Chirat (a dictionary of Latin in French) indicates that dispositio is “disposition providentialle”. It has to do God’s plan for salvation. Fallo is an interesting word. It means basically, “to deceive, trick, dupe, cheat, disappoint” and it has as synonyms “decipio, impono, frustror, circumvenio, emungo, fraudo”. Fallo is used to indicate things like simply being mistaken or being deceived. It can apply to making a mistake because something eluded your notice or it was simply unknown. In our Latin conversation it is not uncommon to say nisi fallor, “unless I am mistaken…”. If you look for submoveo you may have to check under summoveo. Find profutura under prosum. Don’t confuse noxia with noxa.

SUPER LITERAL WDTPRS VERSION:

God, whose providence is not circumvented in its plan,
humbly we implore You,
that You clear away every harmful thing
and grant us all things beneficial
.

There is no getting around or circumventing God’s plan.

Why, given who God is and who we are, would we want to try?

But we do, don’t we.

We have to make a choice about which way to go with noxia.  Does it mean “harmful things” that are outside us or that are within us, that is, our own sins, our faults?  Both?

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973 9th Sunday Ordinary Time):

Father, your love never fails. Hear our call. Keep us from danger and provide for all our needs.

ROFL! Quite simply dreadful.  This may be one of the worst I have ever seen.  But we NEVER have to HEAR IT AGAIN.

CURRENT ICEL (2011  9th Sunday Ordinary Time):

O God, whose providence never fails in its design, keep from us, we humbly beseech you, all that might harm us and grant all that works for our good.

We have to make a choice about which way to go with noxia.  Does it mean “harmful things” that are outside us or that are within us, that is, our own sins, our faults?  Both?
God knows who we are and what we need far better than we can ever know ourselves.

The petition of this Collect closely corresponds to the final petitions of the Our Father: et ne nos inducas in tentationem; sed libera nos a malo, “and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” The expression noxia cuncta, “all harmful things,” embraces both tentationes, temptations, and mala, evils. This correspondence is entirely fitting, since the Our Father, the most perfect of all prayers, provides the fundamental pattern for the Church’s official prayer.

The opening clause establishes the horizon for everything which follows. Divine providence does not miscalculate. God does not discover unforeseen obstacles, revise His eternal wisdom, or lose control of the field. Dispositio is an arrangement, the structure of a discourse, and also the drawing up of forces for battle. Through the Logos, the Word who is divine reason and perfect discourse, all things were made and ordered. We were called into existence in a time, place, state, and network of duties. The circumstances in which fidelity must bear fruit are encompassed within providence.

Foreseeing all our sins and many faults, all that we say and do is embraced in His eternal plan.

He has disposed all things so as to make glorious things result from the evils for which we alone are responsible.

Sometimes, moreover, it is hard to understand that God actually cares are us.  Given how immeasurably vast God is and how small we are, it is easy for some, mired in earthly distractions, to lapse into sort of deism and imagine a God who created everything and then, like a clock maker, just set the pendulum to swing and stepped away.

There is an old adage that, if you want to know if God is interested in you, just make a plan.

It is good for us each day never to forget to make an Act of Faith, which is a good Trinitarian prayer.

O my God, I firmly believe that Thou art one God in Three Divine Persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I believe that Thy Divine Son became Man, and died for our sins, and that He will come to judge the living and the dead. I believe these and all the truths which the Holy Catholic Church teaches, because Thou hast revealed them, Who canst neither deceive nor be deceived.

 

Posted in WDTPRS |
Leave a comment