… this…
I do believe that this is Bergoglio’s villain origin story pic.twitter.com/IBosRc4tv7
— Alberto (@FlatCath) August 13, 2022

… this…
I do believe that this is Bergoglio’s villain origin story pic.twitter.com/IBosRc4tv7
— Alberto (@FlatCath) August 13, 2022


I renew my recommendation. It is an amazing window into the Rome of that time and, therefore, this.
The Genius in the Design: Bernini, Borromini, and the Rivalry That Transformed Rome by James Morrisey.
US HERE – UK HERE – Amazing book.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit
It was my first day back playing OTB today, since May. I had a super advantage as black in the end game against a QGD, completely outplayed him. Then I blew it and hanged mate. I was so stupid that I burst into laughter. A good lesson. Humiliating, but useful.
Sigh.
I am convinced that one of the reasons certain bishops and priests seem determined to suppress the TLM and isolate, marginalize the people who want it is because the TLM unsettles, disturbs, annoys, irritates, needles, vexes clerics involved in one of the sins that cries to heaven.
[…]
The first thing you would have to do is change the way people worship. Change how they pray, and over time over time you change what they believe. In the Vetus Ordo the changers perceive an obstacle to changing the Church’s doctrines, especially in the sphere of sexual morality. Therefore, they must restrict access to public celebrations of the TLM and keep as many priests as possible from learning it. Make sure the liturgy in churches and seminaries emphasizes – on a good day – the Resurrection aspect of the Paschal Mystery and eschatological joy for everyone. Make sure people don’t hear too much about propitiation, sin, guilt and judgment (concepts consistently stripped out of the orations of the Novus Ordo).
At One Peter Five, Peter Kwasniewski (PK, hereafter) has a piece about remarks made by one of the über-haters of the Traditional Latin Mass, Andrea Grillo (aka Mr. Cricket). He is a prof at Rome’s main liturgical school, Sant’Anselmo. Without question he is one of the driving forces in Rome behind the attacks on the Vetus Ordo.
PK looked at one of Mr. Cricket’s recent articles (7 Aug) entitled with a double entendre, “Condoms for Sex and Ecclesiastical Preservation”. The Italian word for “condoms” is “preservativi”. In Italy, don’t ask for “preserves” for your bread and butter. This is the sort of humor Mr. Cricket seems to like. On his blog, Cricket has a photo of himself giving the world the finger.
Someone might say, “But Father! But Father! You have an active imagination. That’s a perfectly innocent picture. But you are the type who sees insults from every gesture of men like the esteemed professor because YOU HATE VATICAN II!”
Okay… why would anyone have this picture, for years?

Probably for the same reason that one of Francis’ closet advisers, if not the closest, fellow Jesuit Fr. Antonio “2+2=5” Spadaro maintains, under his own name, a website in honor of the late homo-erotic writer Pier Vittorio Tondelli.

There is an Italian proverb: “II diavolo non può nascondere la coda…. The devil can’t hide his tail.” The idea is this: The Enemy of the soul and his agents will always tell you what they are up to. Even when they try to fool you through the appearance of beauty, you will find not so well-hidden in it something ugly, twisted and vile. In plain sight.
Back to Mr. Cricket.
He offers an argument for the “reopening” of the question of contraception that is so tangled that it is risible. PK did the heavy lifting at One Peter Five. Suffice to say that one of the chief architects of attacks on the Vetus Ordo, because of his own gnostic insights into the ecclesiology blah blah of Vatican II, is arguing for a reinterpretation of the Church’s teaching on sexuality in marriage by the reopening of the question of contraception.
A couple things.
The rapid rise of homosexual advocacy in the Church… the subtle undermining of the integrity of marriage via paths to Communion for the objectively divorced and remarried… the effort to obscure and even chisel out John Paul II’s “theology of the body”, teaching on the family and foundation of moral theology in Veritatis splendor… the push to reinterpret all of the Church’s teachings, law and liturgy through the lens of whatever it is they glean from Vatican II… to unhinge the sexual act from procreation… to suppress the Vetus Ordo and all who want it… these are all connected.
The Enemy always tells us what he is up to.
Which one of these things is not like the others?
A) Cross-hatched loaf. Get a a little cheese, some slices of sausage, some wine… what’s not to like?

B) Hot Cross Buns. Hot from the oven! Yum.

C) The “bread” at the “cluster” in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee at St. Joan’s and St. Catherine’s (recently featured HERE). They have their own bread ministry. Often referred to by libs as “substantial bread”. It’s more meaningful, you see, because it looks nothing like a cow pie run over by a tractor, but like real bread. Doesn’t it make you think of bread? Immediately? Consider the joiys of the texture! Something like dried particle board. Meaningful. So are all the particles that scatter pretty much everywhere, uncontrollable.

D) Making hosts at St. Agnes Church in St. Paul for all the parish Masses.
Speaking of “substantial bread”…
ANECDOTE: In my seminary in the USA – a horrible place filled with heresy and the black grief of the world – we had “substantial bread” that was so hard, so impossible to get down that even the liberals (the majority) complained about it. We received back the answer from the faculty that – I am NOT making this up! –
“The longer you chew, the more of a sacrament it is.”
To this day, that remark remains one of the stupidest things I have ever heard in a Catholic context.
Catholic? Have a site or web project? The Catholic Signal Corps might be just the right resource for you. Recently we helped Padre Pio Press.
Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.
Today, 50 years ago in Iceland, not much is going on. The great match between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky resumes on 15 August.
Meanwhile, I know you are hungry for more chess lore. I am working my way, slowly, through Birth of the Chess Queen: A History by a feminist writer. It is interesting how in some books that have an ideological goal, or some TV series or movies, the first part is balanced and even-handed, nothing too forward. Then, slowly but surely, less subtle comments or images are put it. It’s as if they are thinking, “If he read/watched this far into the book/TV series/movie, he is hooked and won’t stop. Now is the time to start putting in the a) ideology b) images of homosexual PDAs, c) propaganda. Over time, it’ll have its effect in changing people’s views. Just think Murphy Brown.”
From a priest…
QUAERITUR:
Is it okay to learn how to say the Traditional Latin Mass?
Where are we at with the whole overblown, skewed notion of obedience and authority today that it would enter into a priest’s mind that it might to wrong to learn to say the TLM. Not to say the TLM publicly in defiance of authority, though that will come to pass, I predict. But just to learn how to say it? This points to a whole other problem in the Church today, but I digress. Back to the topic…
Not only is it okay to learn to say the TLM, it is NOT okay NOT to learn to say the TLM.
I would, had I power, oblige every priest of the Latin Church, the Roman Rite, at least to learn it.
Why? Not just because by learning it you learn more about your priesthood.
Why? Not just because by learning it you will change the way you say the Novus Ordo.
Why? Not just because by learning it you will spark a positive knock on effect among the people you serve.
Why? Not just because by learning it you will be better positioned when the lunacy of Taurina cacata has come to an end.
I am convinced that one of the reasons certain bishops and priests seem determined to suppress the TLM and isolate, marginalize the people who want it is because the TLM unsettles, disturbs, annoys, irritates, needles, vexes clerics involved in one of the sins that cries to heaven.
Even if these bishops and priests have never seen or been to a TLM in their lives, they know that the TLM would remind them of what the Novus Ordo does not: sin, guilt and judgment.
The TLM reminds priests in a sobering way about their failings as men and as priests, that they are unworthy sinners who, by the grace of God alone, can stand at the altar to renew the sacred mysteries. This is one of the Church’s precious and encouraging gifts to priests.
Contrary to the claims of those who hate the Traditional Mass, it is the best antidote to clericalism that there is.
We are our rites. A priest gains inestimable riches and insights into who he is at altar through a knowledge of and use of the Vetus Ordo.
Liturgy is doctrine. This is part of the reason why certain powers that be and the wormtongues behind them want to suppress the Vetus Ordo.
Say you want to change certain doctrines, not evolve organically and consistently, but just change. With me?
The first thing you would have to do is change the way people worship. Change how they pray, and over time over time you change what they believe. In the Vetus Ordo the changers perceive an obstacle to changing the Church’s doctrines, especially in the sphere of sexual morality. Therefore, they must restrict access to public celebrations of the TLM and keep as many priests as possible from learning it. Make sure the liturgy in churches and seminaries emphasizes – on a good day – the Resurrection aspect of the Paschal Mystery and eschatological joy for everyone. Make sure people don’t hear too much about propitiation, sin, guilt and judgment (concepts consistently stripped out of the orations of the Novus Ordo).
Cut them off from their roots in what their forebears believed and built.
Atomize them into smaller and smaller communities, each with its own liturgical expression, each with a language that keeps them from praying together as one.
Dumb it all down.
Isolate and bully.
You’ll get your way eventually.
Or so you think.
This, from men who don’t know how to say the TLM.
They would be slightly less hypocritical if they actually knew what they were trying to suppress. They just know what they’ve been told about it.
And there is always that which whispers in their ears that they should get rid of because of… you know.
QUAERITUR: Is the rise of energy to suppress the TLM and the acceleration even at high levels of trying uncouple, so to speak, the Church’s teaching about sexuality from procreation just a coincidence?
They won’t get their way. They can always hurt us more, but it won’t, in the end, work.
I don’t believe that the Vetus Ordo can, over time, be suppressed. That toothpaste is out of the tube now and no amount of oppression will get it back in.
This is a battle over Catholic identity. Catholic identity, not globalist NGO identity, will win.
Am I wrong?
Think about it this way, Fathers. The Lord said that the “gates” (Greek “pylai“) of Hell will not “prevail against” (katisxusousin) the Church He would found. “Gates” don’t attack. “Gates” are defensive structures that are attacked. It is the Church that is on the attack against Hell’s gates. Hell cannot defend itself forever. Hell defends itself with a powerful hellish onslaught. A strong offence is a good defense. But Hell cannot win this one even though it seems that, by attacking constantly, the demons are the attackers.
Even with the Novus Ordo only, properly celebrated, by priests who are devout, brave, focused, with laypeople – though fewer and fewer – trying live their vocations in the state of grace, the Church will, in the end win.
Through no fault of their own, priests and lay people are being sent into battle with only part of the armor and weapons available and they’ve never been fully trained to use them.
Still, we will, in the end, win the day. As Samwise said, “But in the end, it’s only a passing thing, this shadow. Even darkness must pass. A new day will come. And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer.”
If God be for us, who can be against us?
That said, we also want God’s glory to be multiplied. The loss of a soul to Hell means that much less joy in Heaven. If we can win the day, eventually, with Novus Ordo, imagine what we might do together also with the Vetus Ordo. This was Benedict XVI’s vision, not just a Marshall Plan against Hell’s defense-offensives , but a way to even greater glory in Heaven.
I’ll drag my fingers off the keyboard now and let you chew on that.
Fathers, learn the Vetus Ordo. I’ll help. And remember another thing Sam said, “It’s the job that’s never started as takes longest to finish!”
Lay people, encourage your priests. Do everything you can to help them, by prayer and by material support.
And GO TO CONFESSION!
You thick-headed restorationists, you backwardist, dogma-refrigerating Neopelagians… there is only one unique expression of the Roman Rite!
This is how you did it – uniquely – at St. Joan of Arc Catholic Parish in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee on the 19th Sunday in Ordinary Time – 7 August 2022 – 8:00 AM.
St. Catherine of Alexandria and St. Joan of Arc… it’s a cluster.
Highlights of their “Cluster Mass” … but just click anywhere for a unique experience of the Roman Rite.
3:28 opening
20:00 sermon
41:00 offertory
45:00 consecration
49:50 doxology
53:45 instruction before communion
1:09:00 – Had enough?
Remember, the Traditional Mass must be suppressed because… you know, SHUT UP!
Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

In Reykjavík, 50 years ago today, there was one of most interesting of games between defender Spassky (white) and challenger Fischer (black), Game 13.
It was back and forth but it seemed to be a draw. At move 42 they adjourned (which is something that doesn’t happen now). Fischer stayed up all night working on it and was able to force a … victory. The Soviets were convinced only a draw might be possible. When Spassky resigned, he remained in his seat going over what had happened in shock. People look at the game even now and struggle with it: Black Fischer pulled it out with his rook trapped in the corner by a bishop and pawn: a king and five pawns against a king and rook. Download the PGN.
Meanwhile the drama about row removal and accusations from the Soviets of chemical or electronic mind control are going on.
Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.