ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it togetherOn this (N.O.) Feast of the wonderful St. Therese, (St. Remigius ) who saved my vocation, in Rome the sun rose at 7:05, and I saw it, and will set at 18:54.   The Ave Maria should be rung at 19:15.

With great gratitude and not a little relief, I have arrived safely and soundly with all my impedimenta intact. I am grateful to my buddy in Brooklyn who picked dropped me at JFK.

During the flight I mainly slept, eschewed the meals, and played chess against the airplane’s system’s engine.  It wasn’t much of a challenge on the hardest setting.  Keeping an eye on my back rank vulnerability, but things are pretty much in hand… as we landed.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

On the way in, going past EUR.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

Via Ostiense.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

Piramide.  Obviously.  Behind it is the “Protestant” Cemetery.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

Having dropped impedimenta at the apartment, breakfast was sought.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

The things one sees.  That’s an old one, a ROMA F1 plate.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

Shopping for necessities required multiple stops and more than one trip.  I still have a few things to collect, including some pre-positioned things from last time.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

Everywhere, smiling upon us.  Here they are with necklaces as well as crowns.

ROME 22/10 – Day 1: Getting it together

At the Campo de’ Fiori, I also bought some flowers for the apartment.  As one does.

The gals at the grocery store asked for a blessing.  Nice.  They liked the Latin.  So did the people in line behind me.

More later.  I must fight jet lag now, with might and main.

Posted in On the road, SESSIUNCULA, What Fr. Z is up to |
8 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 578, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 578, etc.

Soon I won’t be pulling from the archive!

 

Daily Rome Shot 578, etc.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

“The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to.” Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

There are lots of “signs” these days.

The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to. He puts small hints and indications right in front of our faces woven together with other things that appear to be innocent or beautiful.

Sometimes the signs the Foe reveals are compulsive. He, demons, and human agents can’t help but show them.

Other times, it’s a sort of gloating, a “Look at what I’ve done!” sign.

As for human agents, some higher ups in satanism do all they can to hide their affiliation while the lower echelon members show it off.

Nonetheless, the upper ranks still reveal something of their affiliation without thinking they are doing so.

It has ever been so, but now it seems to be accelerating.

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium. Imperet illi Deus, supplices deprecamur: tuque, Princeps militiae caelestis, Satanam aliosque spiritus malignos, qui ad perditionem animarum pervagantur in mundo, divina virtute, in infernum detrude.

Amen.

St. Michael by Daniel Mitsui

"The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to." Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

Here are shots of the great shrine to St. Michael near Turin, which I visited last June.  This is one of the points along the “Sword of St. Michael”.

"The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to." Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

"The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to." Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

"The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to." Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

"The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to." Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

"The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to." Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

"The Devil, the Enemy of the soul, always tells us what he is up to." Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
8 Comments

How can the “four camps” in the Church be reconciled? 

Today at Crisis (aptly named) editor Eric Sammons argues that there are four camps (roughly speaking) in the Church today – perhaps the Latin Church in the Northern Hemisphere.  Can they be reconciled?  Do they constitute different religions?

The core:

In summary: the hyperpapalists want a Catholicism that is only the current pope; the sedevacantists want a Catholicism that only has a perfect pope; the liberals want a Catholicism where the zeitgeist is the pope; and the restorationists want a Catholicism that includes all the popes, past and present.

How can these four camps be reconciled? To be blunt, they can’t. They are, in practice, four different religions, currently contained within one visible Church. When the very rule of faith is different, then so is the religion. This is a situation that cannot hold; eventually, the veneer of unity will wear thin and disappear. And, if we are being honest, none of the above camps can exist for the long-term.

Go and have a look.

Is he right?

Frankly, I think, as you know, that as the demographic sinkhole opens under the Church there will be a few strong currents left which will have to co-mingle: charismatics (who aren’t like charismatics used to be), converts from Evangelical communities and others with zeal, and “trads” or “restorationists”.  They will overlap.  I know former/present charismatics strongly attached to the TLM.  The same with converts.

There will be frictions, but there will also be a co-mingling, out of which something really interesting – and genuinely Catholic – will develop.

It will not include hyperpapalism.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
18 Comments

My View For Awhile: Romeward Bound

And this is how it works, courtesy of xkcd:

My View For Awhile: Romeward Bound

 

My View For Awhile: Romeward BoundMy View For Awhile: Romeward BoundMy View For Awhile: Romeward BoundMy View For Awhile: Romeward BoundMy View For Awhile: Romeward Bound

UPDATE:

Success! Onboard and ready to go.

My View For Awhile: Romeward Bound

My View For Awhile: Romeward Bound

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 577, etc. – Hurricane Early Edition

I like the sound of wind… in moderation.  I am also mindful of the content of the prayers about storms that our forebears handed down as precious gems.  They knew more than their prayers, those people.  We shouldn’t diss and disregard their gifts to us.

I am not sure that by morning there will be power or internet or cellular phone here, so I’ll post at least this.  Please remember these prayers:  HERE and HERE  I entreat you.

This also means that, if I have power out for a while, I might not be able to access the blog and release comments on the comment queue.  Be patient, pause, and say a Memorare for the overturning of Traditionis custodes.

Daily Rome Shot 577, etc. - Hurricane Early Edition

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  I will have repairs when I am gone and when I get back. US HERE – UK HERE

Support the wonderful monks of Norcia!

Daily Rome Shot 577, etc. - Hurricane Early Edition

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Black to move.

Daily Rome Shot 577, etc. - Hurricane Early Edition

Interested in learning?  This guy helped my game. Try THIS.

My crack tiger team of experts who make sure this, and some other Catholic sites, run smoothly.  Timely.  Competent. Faithful.  Daily Rome Shot 577, etc. - Hurricane Early Edition

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Wolves v. Bear, Windswept House, and the Belgian Waffle Bishops.

Think of a hungry wolf pack and a cornered bear. As the wolves lunge in the bear swats them away with some damage. They keep testing the bear, now this side and now that, one at a time, then two. Eventually the bear gets tired and one of the wolves scores a substantial gain. Eventually Yogi fails.

Imagine Yogi’s thought as he fights for his life.  “Why are these funny looking sheep attacking me?  Something is wrong here.”

Chess works the same way, by the way: if you can attack on both the queen side and king side and have a strong or attacking center, “GG” to your opponent.

Another example.

Think of creeping incrementalism. I remember a scene from Windswept House in which the Card. Bernardin real-life character told a hapless bishop, the Bp. Raymond Lucker real-life character, to make some crazy proposal. The Lucker character balked because he knew he would get shot down. The Bernardin character said that he should then just walk it back. The goal of shifting the needle in their direction just a little would have been accomplished. Peck away. A little at a time.   US HERE – UK HERE

Also, I come from a caucus state in these USA. Quickly you learn that the people who come early, network, are active and vocal, and stay to the end are the one’s who prevail.

This is from the National Catholic Register…

Flemish Bishops’ Document Undermines the Spiritual Quest of Homosexual People, Belgian Theologians Warn

[…]

The Flemish bishops of Belgium announced Sept. 20 the creation of a specific liturgy to bless homosexual couples, as well as the establishment of a “contact point” in parishes for homosexual Catholics.

It’s a project that some theologians consider deeply harmful to the spiritual life of homosexual believers, as well as being in contradiction with the content of the apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia (The Joy of Love), on which it claims to be based.

The three-page document, entitled “Being Pastorally Close to Homosexuals: For a Welcoming Church That Excludes No One,” also directly contradicts a March 2021 opinion from the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which stated that the blessing of homosexual unions “cannot be considered licit.”

This initiative of the bishops of Flanders, which has crystallized the current dissension in the Church over the ways in which the same-sex attracted should be welcomed, was somehow foreseeable. Indeed, the outcry that the Vatican congregation’s document caused last year among a very large part of the Belgian episcopate suggested that the debate was far from being closed in that country.

“I feel a vicarious shame for my Church,” Bishop Johan Bonny of Antwerp wrote in an opinion piece following the publication of the Vatican’s responsum. “I want to apologize to all those for whom this response is painful and incomprehensible. […] Their pain for the Church is my pain today.”

As early as 2014, during the preparation of the Synod on the Family, Bishop Bonny — who represented Belgium at the synod — had announced that he would advocate for the blessing of same-sex couples.

Many other Belgian Catholic leaders also have publicly declared themselves in favor of the blessing of same-sex couples in more recent years, starting with the primate of Belgium himself, Cardinal Jozef De Kesel. The archbishop of Mechelen-Brussels and president of the Belgian Bishops’ Conference had indeed already reflected, in 2018, on the possibility of “prayer celebrations” to seal a lifelong union of homosexual couples.

Moreover, the recent text of the Flemish bishops actually echoes a project launched by the Francophone Diocese of Liège in December 2021, which proposed a special prayer for same-sex couples that must be conducted by “a priest, a deacon, a religious or any other layperson mandated for this purpose by the dean or the parish priest of the pastoral unit.”

[…]

That’s part of the landscape.

One of the best reactions I’ve seen is at the Padre Pio Press blog:

Belgian Waffling

Those stalwart Belgian prelates have really done it. Actually, they only have kind of done it. Who likes a half-baked waffle anyway?

Their patriarchal minds are still half-closed. Pity.

Although we all appreciate their attempt at blessing same-sex unions, one is forced to ask, “why should blessings be confined to them?” in other words, why blessings only for sodomites but not for everyone? After all, we all need accompaniment – except those, you know… Trads.

Of course, these blessings can’t be distributed without true accompaniment and discernment which ought to be accompanied by accompaniment. After all, we have standards. Fidelity is the word.

Just imagine what those close-minded Flems couldn’t imagine: arsonists who faithfully pledge their troth to a particular zip code; johns who promise exclusivity to their cocotte, thieves who refuse to steal from more than one store. But don’t lose hope, little flock. The God of surprises isn’t done with them.

— Fr. Cliff Ermantiger

Once it starts, it doesn’t stop.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 576, etc.

Update on the Rome Trip.  Because of the hurricane, my departure today, Wednesday, for NYC (then Rome on Friday) is impossible.  I was on the phone for a couple hours with Delta trying to figure out how to thread the needle and do so without it costing me a fortune.  Changes to my flight, even with the weather waiver, are going to hurt.  And if I have to do it again, because of weather, and I have to change the Rome departure, oh dear.

So, please pray that God will suppress the force of the hurricane, cut it down to size, head it off, as it were.  It’s coming pretty much right at us now.

Daily Rome Shot 576, etc.

Please remember me when shopping Amazon online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

Black to move and win material.

Daily Rome Shot 576, etc.

3:16 isn’t just in John.Daily Rome Shot 576, etc.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

“This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops. ” Prepare for a rough ride.

When I first saw this, I thought it was a spoof account.

It isn’t.

A first, second and more glances bring one to the conclusion that the people who posted this “art”, approve of the content. Therefore, they hate the Church and are trying to morph it into an NGO. The buck stops on the desk “high atop the thing”.

Let’s imagine that the organizers of the Synod (“walking together”) also asked traditionally minded Catholics for art to express their hope for the Synod (“walking together”).

Are you doing that?  Imagining?

When you are finished laughing, ….

Let’s look at some things. In this one, between the arm and leg “What is revolutionary love?” Yes, what is that? Note the “celebration” area is dominated by “diversity”. This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops.

"This has the logo of the Synod ("walking together") of Bishops. " Prepare for a rough ride.

In this one, note “Reckless”, divided into two words, because the words on the left side are bad and those on the right are good. On the left: liturgy (I’ll agree with that in a restricted, experiential sense), Scripture (1). On the right, Gospel (?), social change, LGB etc.

The Church “can be” refuge? No, it IS refuge. But they mean for illegal immigrants. Not for us. Note cliche riff on the creation of Adam. This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops.

"This has the logo of the Synod ("walking together") of Bishops. " Prepare for a rough ride.

And this one… I guess we are making a macrame banner, just like the in 70’s, even with a guitar.  I’ll get you anything that the music note standings for Kumbaya.  Not sure what that thing is in the lower left.  This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops.

"This has the logo of the Synod ("walking together") of Bishops. " Prepare for a rough ride.

This time the bad stuff is on the right: including LGB… blah blah discrimination and “priest biases” (not grammatical but whatever).  Down in the  aloe plants in the lower left corner, “community”, “acceptance”, “tolerance”, “change”, etc. This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops.

"This has the logo of the Synod ("walking together") of Bishops. " Prepare for a rough ride.

Finally, note the female in priestly vestments behind the guy with the “pride” shirt.

"This has the logo of the Synod ("walking together") of Bishops. " Prepare for a rough ride.

However, the Traditional Latin Mass must be suppressed because the wrong kind of young people want that.

Remember: It’s not just because they hate and fear the content of the Traditional Mass, they hate and fear the people who desire it.

UPDATE:

There’s more.

Note the two candles on the same side of the altar? This was an Italian nun thing and now, I fear, it is priest thing, too, if you get my drift. Good comment on the church HERE.

UPDATE:

A rough ride. Indeed.

What’s going on here? Here’s clue. This is from tweets, put together with a thread reader. I had to do screen shots to get the whole thing.

"This has the logo of the Synod ("walking together") of Bishops. " Prepare for a rough ride.

"This has the logo of the Synod ("walking together") of Bishops. " Prepare for a rough ride.

Posted in Liberals, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, You must be joking! | Tagged
42 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can a Catholic layman officiate at the marriage of non-Catholics?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Is there any situation in which a Catholic layman could officiate a wedding? A friend has been asked to officiate at a non-Catholic wedding ceremony between 2 non-Catholic persons and is unsure whether the Church would approve

In theory, yes. A Catholic layman who is a justice of the peace or a civil/secular judge can officiate at the weddings of two people who are not Catholic.

The Catholic Church only tells Catholics how to marry. It does not tell Lutherans, Jews, Buddhists, or Jesuits… ooops … atheists, etc., how to get married.

Only Catholics are obliged to follow the Catholic canonical form for a wedding. Non-Catholics do not have to.

Two non-Catholics are free to marry in just about any way they choose. The resulting marriage of the two non-Catholic people is valid provided there are no prior bonds. If the parties are baptized (Methodists, Baptists, Presbyterians, etc.), the marriage is not only valid, but is regarded by the Catholic Church as sacramental even if the Protestants do not believe it to be such.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman |
4 Comments