It’s as if the stars aligned on 24 June

Yesterday, which was the real Feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist though bumped a day because of the Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, I posted here and elsewhere:

#SCOTUS overturned Roe & Casey on the Feast of a beating Heart and also of a birth of the “greatest man born of woman” (Matthew 11:11).

The Feast of a Heart without sin and of a Saint who, according to tradition, was forgiven Original Sin before his birth.

What I did not know, and what a friend just emailed me, is that 24 June would have been the 98th birthday of Nellie Gray, the long-time pro-life activist who popularized the term “pro-life” and who founded the March For Life for the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Is it possible that some clever-boots at the SCOTUS looked at a calendar and helped guide the release of the Dobbs v. Jackson opinion?

It sure feels that way.

After all, there are some Catholics around the place.

UPDATE: 

Apparently, according to one of my emails, 24 June 1717 was the date of the founding of Freemasonry in England.

 

Posted in I'm just askin'..., Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
7 Comments

ROME 22/06 – Day 23: Resistance is futile

Sunset was at 20:52 and, somewhere the Ave Maria may have rung at 21:15.  The sunrise was at a distant 5:33.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance, it’s really important for me. US HERE – UK HERE

And please let any mothers in distress know about the Abortion Pill Reversal hotline (877) 558-0333 and about Heartbeat International that handles it.  So many lives saved.

I’ll keep this brief since I am late.

This photo has interesting features.  There is a “littering” sign from The Most Illustrious Monsignor President of the Streets” and there are three rione or region signs.  This is where three intersect.

Supper last night.  I opted for chicken with very sweet onion and tomato dressed with balsamic vinegar, olive oil and basil.

Earlier in the day I resisted this.

For a while.

Keeping hydrated is important when it is so hot.

I wouldn’t drink from this one.   The famous turtle fountain from Alexander VII (Chigi).

And to think, they cleaned it just a few years ago.

Sad, closed, Santa Catarina.

However, Santa Maria in Campitelli is not closed.

Because you like confessionals.

Interesting chapel with two fascinating monuments.

This poor little putto saw the consistory list.

Yum.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to |
3 Comments

On this Feast of the Sacred Heart, when SCOTUS overturned Roe, remember that “Abortion Pill” use will be pushed hard by the Left, and that there is a SAFE REVERSAL after the first pill. @HeartbeatIntl

On this Feast of the Sacred Heart, when SCOTUS overturned Roe, remember that “Abortion Pill” use will be pushed hard by the Left, and that there is a SAFE REVERSAL after the first pill.

Yes, the pill process can be reversed… safely.

There is a wonderful organization called Heartbeat International, which I have been involved with over the years.

Heartbeat, which has been around since before Roe v. Wade, has something called the Abortion Pill Rescue Network which has a 24/7 contact center for women who regret their abortion decision. Many lives have been saved (and counting) through the abortion pill reversal protocol.

Not just the lives of the babies, but also saving women and the men involved probably a lifetime of wounded heartache afterward.

A great many the abortions in these USA not “surgical” anymore, but rather are from the “abortion pill”, which is in two parts, first, RU-486 (mifepristone) and then misoprostol.

If a woman has regret after taking the first pill, the pregnancy may be saved by the Abortion Pill Rescue Network.

This ought to be more widely known.  Spread the word.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
4 Comments

US SUPREME COURT issued Opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson – ROE and CASEY OVERTURNED

Yesterday, SCOTUS gave us: New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen

Today, SCOTUS gave us: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

There is no longer a federal constitutional right to an abortion.? Abortion access will be determined by States.  It is possible that Congress could enact laws.

A couple of really good days.

I note with extreme interest that today is the Feast of St. John the Baptist and the Feast of the Sacred Heart at the same time.  Liturgically St. John is transferred to tomorrow, but his Feast really is today.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged ,
11 Comments

ASK FATHER: Pork butt for the Sacred Heart

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

So .  . . I have to smoke some pork butt today for a get together tomorrow. It will send sweet odors heavenward, low and slow and very very tempting for us mortals still stuck on Earth.  All day long that scent will drift through the air.

It got me wondering about Feast days that might exempt us from abstinence.  Is the Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus a major feast day, or will it be a particularly efficacious day of abstinence?

Canon 1251 of the Code of Canon Law for the Latin Church says:

Can. 1251 Abstinence from meat, or from some other food as determined by the Episcopal Conference, is to be observed on all Fridays, unless a solemnity should fall on a Friday. Abstinence and fasting are to be observed on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday.

Today, 24 June 2022 is…

a) a Friday,
b) the Feast of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus (bumping John the Baptist who won’t mind), and as such today is
c) a Solemnity (Novus calendar – 1st Class Vetus), and therefore today is
d) NOT a day for obligatory abstinence, etc.

Some printed trad calendars not withstanding, we go by the 1983 Code of Canon Law.  And that’s the Code as it is now, not as it was or as we think it ought to be.

Hence, staying on the “heart” image…

If you want to eat meat today, you can do so with a light heart, even if it goes straight to your left anterior descending.

If you don’t want to eat meat today, you can abstain with a light heart, even if it is vegan.

Would today be a “particularly efficacious” day of abstinence?  How should I know?   That would be between you and God, who knows you better than you know yourself.

Okay, I’ll try to answer in some way.

Sure, I guess it could be, but then again, so could it be next Tuesday, depending on why you were doing it, the secret motions or your mind and heart, the circumstances.  Frankly, I think that each and every willing, loving, joyful act of penance, for – for example – reparation for sins is met with by graces from God and smiles all around in Heaven.  How many graces and how large the smiles, I cannot say.   I think, “lots” might have something to do with the number, and “really” might have to do with the largeness of the smiles, at least from those with bodies, which aren’t too many, come to think of it.

Obligatory abstinence on such a joyful feast as today seems somewhat contrary to our Catholic identity, but whatever smokes your butt.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law | Tagged
1 Comment

What do we do when we synodize?

At Crisis there is a scorching, rousing piece by Fr. John Perricone about the synodal (“walking together”) process as a form of naval gazing.  It’s quite a read:

The Synodal “listening sessions” can easily be dismissed as another parlor game, most certainly passé by tomorrow. But that would be naïve. It is far darker. These sessions are a capitulation to the zeitgeist on a universal scale. It is the tip of the iceberg, concealing beneath a massive project of deconstruction. While many Catholics may not appreciate its true danger, it still seeps into their souls like a colorless, odorless gas that kills.

This got me thinking about a tune from this blog’s official parodohymnodist, Fr. Ferguson.   He composed some lyrics waaaaaay back in the 80’s about the parish program much in vogue at the time: Renew.   Remember that?

Anyway, the “process” and “renew” strike me as having common elements.

Here’s the song, to the tune of the Burt Bacharach song, I’ll New Fall In Love Again).

What do we do when we do RENEW?
We get together and we read some scripture
we drink some coffee and we hug each other.
I’m never going to Mass agaaaaain,
I’m never going to Mass again.

Don’t tell me what it’s all about
the words we say don’t have any meaning,
one of these days you’ll wake up and see,
we’re laying out a new heresy!

What do we do when we do RENEW?
We get together, then we write some scripture
we drink more coffee then we hug each other.
I’m never going to Mass agaaaaaaain,
I’m never going to Mass again.

What do we do when we synodize?

Posted in Linking Back, Synod, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged , , ,
5 Comments

ASK FATHER: Does the humeral veil contradict in the use of Eucharistic ministers?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

When the humeral veil is used does it not show a contradiction in the use of Eucharistic ministers? I’m really interested in trying to form an argument against Eucharistic ministers, by way of something everyone seemingly has no issue with, that being the instances where the humeral veil is used and what it shows us by it’s use. Does this make sense? Am I incorrect in my theory here?

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

Hmmm – let’s clean up the language a bit – Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion.

I’m not sure that the humeral veil’s use in either the current Missal or the previous ritual provides a strong argument against the use of Extraordinary Ministers. It certainly speak to the reverence we should have for the Eucharist, but since the priest who uses the humeral veil also gets to touch the vessel (and the Sacrament) with unveiled hands, I’m not sure it could be used to de-justify extraordinary ministers, except in a broad, symbolic way.

I was reflecting, the other day, that the use of gold vessels exclusively for the Holy Eucharist might be a stronger (albeit still symbolic) argument. Gold, which has been tested in the crucible of fire, can symbolize the (ideal) purity of the priesthood (let’s not talk too much about the crucible of seminary)

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
3 Comments

ROME 22/06 – Day 22: “Even in another church St. Rita is sad… about… you know.”

On this hot hot hot Roman day, and humid, the sun rose at 5:33 and will set in a few minutes at 20:52.  The Ave Maria is in the 21:15 cycle.  Would you like to hear a recording of a real Ave Maria chime?

I was refused a taxi today by drivers who claimed a strike.  It is too laugh, as Bugs would say.   Anyway, rather than hoof it in the heat, I popped into a church I hadn’t seen for a while. San Pantaleone.

Saint Paula is holding away from the reach of the child the consistory list, because she knows it will hurt her.

Because you should be reminded to

GO TO CONFESSION!

How long, O Lord?

Look at this liturgical nightmare, and here is the body of their great saint!

No, child, you may not see the consistory list.  Look what it did to your brother.

When I see St. Anne I think of the late, great Extraordinary Ordinary, whose like we long to see again.

Even in another church St. Rita is sad… about… you know.

I walked over the Ghetto, because I wanted to scope out a possible street for an apartment.  Meanwhile, something to eat.

In the area I stopped in at another church, and there was this tomb, on which the inscription had some pointed remarks.

More later.   Meanwhile, as I make my supper and construct this post, I am aware that Nepo took the lead today.

I raise my glass to all you who helped me to come here.  You are in my daily prayers.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

Vatican Synod’s (“walking together”) on spirituality of synodality (“walking togetherality”) is coming: The merciful heart loves… demons.

This isn’t satire or parody or Fr. Z’s version of the Babylon Bee.

The Vatican’s Synod (“walking together”) on Synodality (“walking togetherality”) is coming.    They produced a document on the spirituality of synodality.   HERE and PDF of the actual document HERE.

I wrote about this yesterday.   HERE   I pointed out a couple of their core ideas, such as, “It is not enough to have a synod. We must be a synod.” and “The point of entry must always be ‘situatedness’.”

I promise you I am not making this up.  A reader clued me in.

On page document page 29 (PDF page 31).

Discernment, then, is also an opening of the heart in love and mercy to all things. As St Isaac of Nineveh (St Isaac the Syrian) expresses it:

What is a merciful heart? It is a heart on fire for the whole of creation, for humanity, for the birds, for the animals, for demons, and for all that exists. By the recollection of them, the eyes of a merciful person pour forth tears in abundance. By the strong and vehement mercy that grips such a person’s heart, and by such great compassion, the heart is humbled, and one cannot bear to hear or to see any injury or slight sorrow in any in creation. For this reason, such a person offers up tearful prayer continually even for irrational beasts, for the enemies of the truth, and for those who harm her or him, that they be protected and receive mercy. And in like manner, such a person prays for the family of reptiles because of the great compassion that burns without measure in a heart that is in the likeness of God.18

18 First Collection, Homily 74.

Do get out there and pray for reptiles.   Or maybe for demons depicted as reptiles?

Hmmm… isn’t Satan first depicted in Scripture as being a reptile?  Isn’t the S. American demon/god Quetzalcoatl a feathered serpent?

Here’s the situatedness.  This quote of Isaac the Syrian, “of Nineveh”, is quite popular in Eastern Christian thought.  Google it.  You find it also amongst environmentalists and animal rights activists such as the Animal Liberation Front (really).

At first glance this is a little alarming. My first thought was, “What does he mean in Syriac by demon?”   I looked around at some of Isaac the Syrian’s writings.  He talks about demons quite a bit and he really means demons: fallen angels.  Isaac is also considered by scholars to be – not without some disagreeing – a believer in apokatastasis, that is, the eventual salvation of all creatures.  For now, Isaac thinks that there truly is a Heaven and a Hell and that Hell is not empty.  But eventually?  [Not sure how that works.]

He also believes that God loves the damned and that the damned know that and that it makes them suffer more.

If there is out there an expert on Isaac the Syrian’s thought, please correct me if I am wrong.

In any event, it seems to me a curious thing to find, in a document produced by the Vatican’s Synod (“walking together”) document on the spirituality of synodality (“walking togetherality”), there should be a reference to loving – what else does “having a heart on fire” mean? – demons, when it was for a Synod that the demon idol Pachamama and all the environment mumbo jumbo was being bandied about.

It is not out of bounds to quote non-Catholic writers in such a document, but it seems to me that they’ve gone rather far afield to find someone who – and there’s a difference – affirms their position rather than shapes their position.

It seems to me that if you were on a team that was trying to get Catholics with skulls full of mush open to praying to trees and loving lizards with “hearts on fire” and even loving demons, this would be on the reading list.

Put enough of these comments into enough documents or speeches, and the cumulative effect over time will manifest itself.

It’s going to look a lot like a demon, too.

 

 

Posted in Synod, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! |
17 Comments

ASK FATHER: What if 100 priests wanted to leave a diocese because of the bishop?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What if… How hard is it for a priest to move away from one diocese and be incardinated in another? Wouldn’t it be a loud and stunning message if, say, 100 or so priests decided to move away from dioceses with bad bishops to one to four dioceses with faithful bishops.

How hard is it for a priest to move to another diocese?  It is as easy or as hard as the bishops involved want to make it.

Yes.  A hundred priests suddenly wanting to leave and actually taking action.  That would make a real statement.  Of course that scenario involves men leaving also their homes, that is, the area where they grew up, which also means distance from their families.  Our Lord did say that we should be willing to leave everything and everyone for His sake.  And it is true that people do leave their home turf for work or for love or for other interests.  But it is a factor.

Also, priests are not just pawns on a chessboard, or warm bodies to be plugged into empty slots.   They are treated that way quite often, of course.  Often they are treated like indentured servants who have, barely, right to Christian burial… and that’s about it.   Just think for a moment about how bishops treated priests via the Dallas Charter, which has ongoing, seriously annoying and unjust implications for priests.  By the way: the bishops exempted themselves from the burdens they laid on the priests.

Another thing to be considered is the pressure on the excardinating bishop and the incardinating bishop from other bishops!   I suspect that they would want to snuff out such a development and make it is hard as possible to do.

The overall scheme of moving, according to the Church’s laws, involves a “trial period” in the new diocese of several years.  Also, excardination from one diocese shouldn’t be denied unless there is a good reason.  Of course it is possible for a bishop to decide to be unreasonable.  Bishops can torture priests in a thousand ways.

And there are other human factors involved.  For example, how well would the local presbyterate welcome the influx?   It could be that a sudden increase in numbers would be very welcome indeed, especially by overworked priests.  Still, it could happen that the incoming men would forever be treated as “outsiders”.  That happens.

Also, on the human level, each priest has his own individual history and issues.  A bishop would not be wrong to consider that, even though he might be hungry for more priests.

Alas, I suspect that this factor suppresses the last embers of warmth some bishops might have, so that they move reluctantly, everyone (lawyers) hounding them to be careful, etc. “Maybe if you drag it out, the potential for problems will go away and it won’t look like it’s your fault.”

It would be an amazing bishop who, seeing a decent priest who would be a good fit, says, “Yes, please do come!” instead of a hemming and hawing “Well, okay.  I guess you can come.”   It is far more likely that a bishop would leave guys twisting in the wind, oblivious to the pain.

The old Roman adage is “cunctando regitur mundus… the world is ruled by delaying”.  This cuts two ways, of course.  One could digress on the disaster that 6 year assignments for priests has produced over time. But I won’t.

In the case of a priest moving – or a seminarian for that matter – be wary of going to a place because there is a good bishop there.  Bishops come and bishops go.  Go to some place because of the bishop and, bammo, he retires, moves or dies. Then there comes “a new pharaoh who knows not Joseph” and you are well and truly up the proverbial creek.   The potential for heartbreak is galactic.

Lay people could experience this by uprooting and moving close to a great parish. Then, wham!, the pastor changes and everything goes to hell in a handbasket.

A take away for seminarians would be this.  It is far more prudent, if it is necessary to move for the sake of your vocation (if not to religious life or a specialized group), to go to a place where you think you will be happy, bishop notwithstanding.

I’m afraid that the state of affairs is highly iffy right now, my dear readers.  There is little unity or consistency of Cult, Code and Creed in the Church right now, amongst priests and bishops too, which makes local changes a real crap shoot.

And as I write, I am conscious that, in the USA at least, this is the time of year that lots of diocese priests’ assignments are being made and men are moving around.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box |
12 Comments