Purim 2020

Part of our family history as Catholics are the Jewish festivals.  We don’t observe them today, but the are part of our long-term heritage.  The Jewish festivals pointed backward to important events in salvation history and forward to their fulfillment in the Lord’s life and mission.

Purim began yesterday and ends today, 10 March, at sunset.

What is Purim?

Purim celebrates how God, through Esther and her adoptive father Mordechai, saved the Jewish people from the hateful Hamman and the King during the Persian captivity.  Purim is not one of those major festivals like Passover or Tabernacles, but it was a time of rejoicing, annually celebrated with traditions.

One of the customs of Purim is to read or sing the whole Book of Esther, which is called “the whole megillah (megillat – scroll)”.   Now you know where that phrase comes from. There are several “megillah books”, but Esther is probably the most associated with the word.

During the singing of the whole megillah, when the name of the evil Hamman is pronounced, the people often shout and make noise with noisemakers to blot out his name, a kind of damnatio memoriae.  There are some interesting Youtube videos of the singing of Esther that have this blotting out of “Hamman”.   For example, HERE, at synagogue in Tampa, they really get into it.  Check out about 1:30.

By the way, don’t be puzzled by the seemingly cheerful raucous music that introduce some of these Megillah Esther videos.  Purim is a time of serious partying.   There is a lot of dressing up in costumes and feasting.

Here is a singing of Esther from the Synagogue in Rome (Hebrew with an Italian accent).  Chapter 3 starts at 12:35 or so and right after is a mention of the hated Hamman.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

It is probable that when the Lord went up to Jerusalem for a “feast of the Jews” in John 5, and when he healed a man at the Pool of Bethesda, it was Purim.

BTW… you might review the dialogue of the Lord with the man who was for so long by that pool.  Given that this pool was outside the walls, where no one dwelt, and the man in theory couldn’t get around on his own, and therefore had to be brought there daily, the Lord’s question: “Do you want to be healed?” takes on a new quality.

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
5 Comments

A Latin note

From Twitter….

“HA HA!  Typo!”, you might be saying.  “Don’t they know it’s sacrificandam not scarificandam?”

Nope.  There is actually a Latin verb scarifico, meaning, “to scratch open, scarify”.  To “scarify” in English means to cut and scratch off debris, as in a medical procedure.

Now about that fodat….   Oooops.   You mean fodiat, right?   Fodio… doh!

Really, it’s a bit of a clunky mess (“illud est ut illa“?  Who talks like that?), but you get the drift.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: What about confession if the virus gets really bad and we are all locked down?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I just read that Italy is taking the measure of locking down the entire country, 60 million people, until 3 April.  I don’t know if this is irrational panic or not.  Let’s say that it is.  Let’s say this coronavirus or another disease gets really bad.

If the country is on lockdown I suppose we won’t have the obligation to go to Mass on Sundays.

However, how would we get Last Rites or make a confession?  If priests have the right or permission to move around for pastoral emergencies, how would they hear our confessions if we can’t let them in or go out?

If things get really really really bad, there is the option of General Absolution.  A priest, even from a bit of a distance, could absolve a group of people of their sins.  That said, when the emergency abated, everyone who had received that absolution would have to go to regular auricular confession as soon as possible, except in the case of danger of death.

But, sticking to the scenario as presented…

Last Rites, which means (possibly) confession, with anointing and administration of Viaticum.   That would require that the priest by physically present to the person.  A priest could use a tong to administer the anointing and even the Host for Communion.  But he has to be within reach physically to anoint the person on the skin.

Confession.   This is a little more flexible.   I am running scenarios through my mind.

For absolution to be valid, the priest and the penitent must be present to each other physically.  They don’t have to be close.  I think that present means within hearing distance.  If the priest and penitent are far enough apart that they have to shout and other people could hear them, in that case, General Absolution can be used.

But wait!  Perhaps you have seen that in some older confessionals there were electronic devices like telephones in a jail visiting room for penitents (or priests!) who were hard of hearing.  Therefore, the penitent, on the other side of the grate, could use an electronic means to make himself heard.

If that is the case, I think that the priest, on one side of the door, and the penitent, on the other side of the door, could communicate the matter of the confession (the sins) and subsequent counsel and penance, either by raising their voices (if not using General Absolution) or even by mobile phone, or text.  Yes, there could be a risk that someone might intercept.  However, I don’t see a difference between that and the confessional amplifier other than the fact that the confessional amplifier is an enclosed system.  The priest is physical present, as if on the other side of a confessional grate and the matter of the confession (sins) is communicated.  The priest can validly absolve.

Could that same thing work if, for example, the priest were in a car on the street, and the penitent were at the door or window of a house or apartment.  Within sight and hearing, but at a distance and where people might hear?   I think so, provided they are within sight and hearing.  In that case, perhaps, a mobile phone could be used and absolution could be given with a raised voice.

Let’s have another futuristic scenario.  Remember that I am character in a sci-fi book series!  I know what I am talking about.

Let’s say that I am chaplain in the SpaceForce and we are deployed in our space wing.  If you, an attack vehicle door gunner get grazed with a chemical oxygen iodine laser and you are, so to speak, toast, you could key me via comms (“CHAPS! I’m HIT!”). I, from another ship, would activate my jetpack, get eyes on you in your red shirt/space armor and absolve you, dodging the debris and force beams.  I could probably validly absolve you over comms if I can get into moral physical contact even though the sound of my voice cannot travel through the void of space!

Alternatively, since I have been doing some reading around the topic of the administration of sacraments by the deaf or by the mute priest, and there are evolving views of what “language” means, I might, might, if comms were down, when you are trapped behind a bulkhead and losing oxygen, I might be able to absolve you by tapping and scraping (dits and longer dahs) in Morse code with a specially blessed titanium hammer I could have for that purpose (provided you know Morse!!).  Yes, you would have to know Morse code.   But I couldn’t absolve in Morse from another ship.  I’d have to be on the other side of that bulkhead doing it physically with my Titanium Absolution Form Hammer (officially designated TITFAB-RC or as my Space Marines have lovingly dubbed it, the “Tap Out”).  Given that this is a thick bulkhead and I am using a hammer to scrape and tap, I might be able to tap/scrape either in zero-G (ZIGEE) or compromised artificial-G (ARTGEE), what? 10 WPM?

Another reason to learn Morse code.

Now, if we were time travelling, and the the polarity was suddenly reversed… which I don’t rule out…

Leave that for another day.

Just to be clear, anyone can make a confession via megaphone, telephone, semaphore flags, or ham radio.  A priest cannot validly absolve solely by those means.    He must be physically present to you, at least morally.  There must be adequate proximity to use an electronic intermediary.  You can’t be absolved if you are in, say, Columbia Heights, and I am here in the Cupboard Under The Stairs.

All the more reason to GO TO CONFESSION while you can do so easily!

And, in case you were wondering, I am way cooler than Dan Dare in Kennedy’s books.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, GO TO CONFESSION | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

MEXICO: Women protestrices vandalize #Catholic churches, assault those who tried to protect them

Get a load of this.

This is demonic.

We will see more of this in times to come.

Posted in Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
6 Comments

This blog, donations, cancellations, and you.

Friends, I am deeply grateful for your donations. They are what keep me in insurance and groceries.

That said, I have had a few notes from people wondering why I cancelled their monthly donations.

I haven’t.

Here’s what is happening …. I think.

I get notices from PayPal that someone’s subscription was cancelled BY PAYPAL, because of an expired credit card or other problem.

However, I think people get notices from PayPal that their subscription was cancelled without further explanation and they think that I did it.

Trust me. I didn’t. As a matter of fact, I only have done that once, and that is a long story.

So, I get these notes from PayPal. Sometimes… not often enough… I get a note from PayPal that the person then reestablished a monthly donation.

If this blog is useful to you, please consider signing up. I record the names of everyone who donates or sends something and remember you at the altar as benefactors. For example, recently in the Holy Land I offered Masses for you, in particular, I offered my Mass on the Tomb of Christ in Jerusalem. I pray for you often.

Please pray for me as well.


Some options




Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
Comments Off on This blog, donations, cancellations, and you.

ASK FATHER: What to do when intransigent priests refuse Communion on the tongue.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I’m thinking we should all have a united voice on the question of reception of Holy Communion in a time of draconian policies forbidding Communion on the Tongue with the excuse of Coronavirus. You have a great presentation on this – which I put in my parish bulletin – but the rights of the faithful to always receive on the tongue. A question has arisen from Christ’s faithful because of the intransigence of pastors who refuse Communion on the tongue irregardless of anyone’s rights. In order to receive Holy Communion they must receive on the hand. They don’t want to do this. Should they abstain, or just go ahead and receive on the hand? Thanks for your very helpful blog.

This is a complicated matter.

Firstly, most priests are good men.  They want to do the right thing.  Often, they don’t read carefully when letters or documents come from chanceries or bishops.  Sometimes they don’t catch that what a bishop is sending out is a suggestion or his own personal preference.  Otherwise, even understanding that the bishop’s preference is for X, they fall in line without further discernment.  That’s not what the diocesan priest’s promise of obedience is all about.  Priests are not indentured servants, though they are often viewed that way.   In any event, most priests are good men who want to do the right thing.

Next, being good men, and busy men, they are sometimes easy to bamboozle.  Since they don’t often have a lot of time to think and to read and to research, they simply take at face value whatever claims are made by, for example, the chancery about Communion on the hand v. on the tongue.   Thus, missing that it is only the suggestion of the bishop that they suspend Communion on the tongue, they take that as an imperative and, without additional reflection about how their own fingers are in constant contact with people’s hands when distributing, they tug their forelock and tell people that for the time being Communion on the tongue is “not allowed”, which is false.  Cf. Redemptionis Sacrament 92.

Next, I sometimes am uneasy when matters having to do with specific practices are referred to as a “right”.  Let’s be a little careful.

Also, I imagine that there are some bishops and priests who are actually glad to have the excuse of coronavirus to repress Communion on the tongue.  They probably belong to a different religion than I do, but that hasn’t stopped men from being ordained before.

So, to the question.  What to do about priests who are intransigent and refuse to distribute on the tongue, in time of contagion or not?  Should people abstain?  Receive in the hand, when that would be contrary to their consciences?

As I sit here with my coffee… now cool, as I have been weighing my response for some time… I have come up with the following.  And this really isn’t a dodge.

It depends.

It depends on your present circumstances.

Let’s make this clear clear clear: It is not obligatory to present yourself for Communion at every Mass.  It is not necessary to receive Communion to fulfill your Mass obligation.  It really is okay to choose not to receive Communion occasionally, especially if you find yourself in an attitude of routine.

The regular or daily Mass goer, whose life at the moment is fairly placid and normal, who is also practicing good devotions and attending to his state in life, could without too many spiritual ripples make a spiritual Communion at that Mass.

On the other hand, say a person is truly beset with cares, perhaps even suffering some spiritual oppression.  That person would greatly benefit from reception of Communion frequently.   If that person isn’t so determined never to receive on other than the tongue, then go ahead and receive on the hand (provided it is not a TLM – at which this scenario is nearly unthinkable).  Hopefully, one day, all Catholics will choose on their own only to receive on the tongue.

Spiritual Communion, fueled by the additional suffering, could be meritorious.  And, please, let’s avoid the errors of the Jansenists as well as the errors of laxists, etc.

That said, I can imagine a couple of additional scenarios that the faithful might present to an intransigent priest.

To begin, one or more people – who opted to make a spiritual Communion – might approach Father after Mass to tell him, politely, but concisely, “How very sad you have made us this morning.  Have a nice day, Father.”  After a couple repeats of this, perhaps with a larger group each time, present a collectively signed letter, copied to the bishop.

It could be helpful to have on video, perhaps with a discreet phone, one person after another being denied Communion on the tongue.   On that note, here’s a clip from the 1981 movie about Gandhi. This is now I see some of these priests, like the guards “just following orders”.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

And still it went on and on. This is how, by the way, most trads are treated… even those who are cheerful and less likely to bring on bad treatment from priests.

In a moment of rather dark thoughts about such a priest, I momentarily envisioned swaths of people in the congregation turning their backs to the priest as he made his way to the altar.   Turning back, of course, as Mass begins.   Harsh?   Well… yes.  But are reception of Communion and the respect of the priest for the lay faithful important?  Yes.   Deeply, so.  It could be that Father is way up in the stratosphere when it comes to his schedule and his own liturgical preferences, etc.   Sometimes it is hard to get through to priests.  I know this from personal experience.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
21 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 2nd Sunday of Lent – 2020

Was there a good point made in the sermon you heard at the Mass that fulfilled your Sunday Obligation? What was it? There are a lot of people who don’t get many good points in the sermons they must endure.

For my part, before talking about the Transfiguration, I gave some pointers about how properly to receive Communion, both on the hand (appalling as that is) and on the tongue.  Repetita iuvant.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
15 Comments

Amazing video clip from a movie!

As people (read: bishops, chanceries) freak out over coronavirus, I offer this, which I picked up from a Tweet.  I don’t know what the movie is.  Anyone?

He’s sweating.  Maybe he has The VIRUS!

Meanwhile, lighter fare for those of you who know Italian and it’s variants…

Posted in Be The Maquis, Just Too Cool | Tagged
16 Comments

PRIESTS! BISHOPS! ACTION ITEM! Ideas, some novel, some not so novel, for increasing CONFESSIONS

Have I ever urged you …

GO CONFESSION!

Yes, I believe I have.

I have also urged priests and bishops to preach, teach, admonish, in season and out, about the Sacrament of Penance and to hear confessions.  Get into the box.  People will come.  It’s not complicated.

First, an article with my comments.  Afterward, some documentation from the Holy See about a CONCRETE way to increase the use of the Sacrament of Penance.

From Crux:

BALTIMORE – Confession has a confession to make: The sacrament of reconciliation isn’t the draw it once was.

A recent Pew Research Center study found that only 43 percent of American Catholics avail themselves of confession at least once a year. And from there, the numbers get grimmer. A paltry 17 percent go more than once a year, and a scant 7 percent go monthly[And yet, even of the Catholics who go to Mass on Sundays, go to Communion?  Each sacrilegious Communion harms the whole Body of Christ.  Is it any surprise that the Church is a mess right now?]

Usually offered in the middle of the weekend on Saturday afternoons, confession can be a hard sell for busy Catholics. The subject matter, sin, also can be a stumbling block in a culture that can be, at times, too enamored with accentuating the positive.  [Accentuating the positive?  WHAT?  It’s obsessed with exalting wickedness!]

Confessing our shortcomings – on social media, in the therapist’s office and elsewhere – is more popular than ever. But seeking absolution and greater connection with God? Not so much.

That’s why some priests are pushing back against empty confessionals in novel ways. It’s time for confession to make a comeback, they say.  [“Novel ways”… okay.  I’m game.  What would they be, I wonder.]

“It wasn’t preached, and it wasn’t made available,” Father Michael DeAscanis said of the decline. “The more we talk about the benefits of confession and the more we make it available, make it easier for people. I think you’ll see this rediscovering of confession.”  [Ummm… that’s novel?  Telling people about it and then getting into the box?   Mind you, I am NOT complaining!]

The priest is pastor of St. Philip Neri Parish in Linthicum Heights, Maryland, and parish administrator of St. Clement I Parish in Lansdowne, Maryland.

Father Brian Nolan joined St. Isaac Jogues Parish in Carney, in Baltimore County,  as pastor about a year and a half ago and realized the regular Saturday afternoon confession time wasn’t going to cut it.

“Probably the worst time of anybody’s week,” Nolan told the Catholic Review, the news outlet of the Baltimore Archdiocese. “Like, who stops midday on a Saturday? What we say in general that is you meet people where they are. Everybody comes on Sunday.”  [Gosh, I dunno about that.  My home parish had confessions from 3:30-5:00 on Saturdays and then again 7:30-9:00 (or until done).  More than one priest.  There were lines.]

He started offering another session on Sunday night, right before St. Isaac Jogues’ most popular Mass. Nolan said the parish is making slow and steady progress encouraging more attendance.

“Some people could say, well, sin is negative, but it’s real. And to ignore it, it’s like ignoring cancer,” Nolan said. “Instead of being weighed down by sins and blocking at times the grace of God in your life, why not have a free, full availability of receptivity to God and his grace?”  [Very good.  Still waiting for the “novel” part.  Is it possible that the writer, social media coordinator for the Catholic Review and the Archdiocese of Baltimore, hasn’t heard this before?]

Charles Strauss, associate professor of history Mount St. Mary’s University in Emmitsburg, said the decline in confession in the United States began in the 1960s. Before that, from about 1840 to the 1950s, the sacraments, including confession, were woven into the daily lives of many Catholics, especially recent European immigrants.

“Frequent confessions, weekly or monthly, just became part of the cycle. You know, part of the schedule of one’s life,” said Strauss, who also serves as executive secretary-treasurer of the American Catholic Historical Association. “And it was not just regulated by parents, but by authority figures like Catholic schoolteachers, mostly religious and by parish priests.” [Remember what I have said about the fusing of various forces into a single halcyon icon in the minds of those who grew up in the 60’s?]

The decline in confession can’t be traced to one cause, but many factors, said Strauss, a member of St. Francis Xavier Parish in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The suspects are many and varied: A general distrust in authority that became prominent in the 1970s; well-meaning reforms by the church that deemphasized sin also may have discouraged penance; and even the move toward a less formal society.

“If you’re not having a meal in your home together, is it going to be even realistic to think you’re going to follow other rituals of your religious denomination?” Strauss said.  [Great point!]

Father James Boric is among the priests in the Baltimore Archdiocese championing the sacrament of reconciliation. He is rector of the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Baltimore.

Boric, who decided to become a priest after a particularly powerful confession, has vastly expanded the hours that the basilica offers the sacrament.

He offers confession before midday Masses daily from 11:30 a.m. to noon and also on Sunday. He stays after Masses and offers confessions on major – and well attended – celebrations such as Christmas and Easter. He also offers the sacrament Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday from 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.  [Again, not novel.  Common sense.  I applaud him!]

But Boric said more convenient times are only part of the solution. He regularly preaches about sin and confession, even though some parishioners may not like what could be seen as a negative message.

“We have to preach sin,” Boric said. “If there’s no sin in the world, then nothing’s wrong. Then why go to confession?

“We’ve experienced a tremendous increase in confessions. [There it is!] Now, I’ve made a concerted effort over three years to preach about it often,” he added. “So on like big days, like Divine Mercy Sunday, when there are such great promises attached to the sacrament, I will hear confessions for three, four hours straight.”

In Linthicum Heights, DeAscanis is not only encouraging confession in general but also preaching the benefits of regular confession.

Once a year good. Twice a month better,” is his mantra.

Regular confession can help you better interact with the people you love in your life, DeAscanis said.

He recommends that to get the most out of confession, parishioners should do an examination of their conscience beforehand to focus their thoughts. [Before!] He has a guide for doing that printed in his weekly church bulletin. Quality guides also can be found on line.

“We just need to repent. And I think that in some ways we’re afraid of doing that,” Boric said. “And it is hard. I mean, when you’re calling out the sins of the culture, you know, whether it’s promiscuity, whether it’s living together before marriage, whether it’s pornography and all the things that affect people.

And yet there’s a solution … salvation.”

I applaud the priests who are trying to rebuild practice of regular confession.   In doing so, they are also helping themselves.  Priests and bishop will have to give an account to God for what they did about the Sacrament of Penance, which they solemnly promised at the time of their ordinations to administer.

I will add two things.

First, check out Fr. Z’s 20 Tips For Making A Good Confession.  It is always available at this blog, down towards the bottom in a menu.

Also, FATHERS!  BISHOPS!  Priests can hear confessions DURING MASS!

Of course they can’t hear confession why they themselves are saying Mass.  But another priest can.  If there is another priest available, that priest can hear confessions during Mass and then help with Holy Communion, thus eliminating the need in most cases for a lay person.

“But Father!  But Father!,” some of you addlepated libs are mooing, “This is intolerable!   How could you say that reconciliation is so needed that ordained ministers should do it during Eucharistic sharing?  And then… then… to take away the rights of non-ordained ministers to fulfill their community authorized ministry of sharing the bread and cup?  You … youuuuuuuu…. you HATE VATICAN II!”

CONFESSIONS DURING MASS!

While this is not really a novel idea, because it was a wide-spread custom back in the day, it is novel-er than the pretty much un-novel novel ideas underscored by the writer of the article, above.  Also, it is authorized and even promoted by the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship.

in Redemptionis Sacramentum 76 we read:

Furthermore, according to a most ancient tradition of the Roman Church, it is not permissible to unite the Sacrament of Penance to the Mass in such a way that they become a single liturgical celebration. This does not exclude, however, that Priests other than those celebrating or concelebrating the Mass might hear the confessions of the faithful who so desire, even in the same place where Mass is being celebrated, in order to meet the needs of those faithful. This should nevertheless be done in an appropriate manner.

Cf. Pope John Paul II, Apostolic Letter (Motu Proprio), Misericordia Dei, 7 April 2002, n. 2: AAS 94 (2002) p. 455; Cf. Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Response to DubiumNotitiae 37 (2001) pp. 259-260.

Also, here is something translated from the Latin found in Notitiae 37 (2001 – no. 419-420) pp. 259-260 with my emphases and comments:

Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (October 2001)

What are the dispositions governing the time for the celebration of the sacrament of Penance? For example, can the faithful have recourse to the sacrament of Penance during Mass?

The principal norms governing the time for the celebration of the sacrament of Penance are to be found in the Instruction Eucharisticum mysterium (25 May 1967), which states: The faithful are to be constantly encouraged to accustom themselves to going to confession outside the celebration of Mass, and especially at the prescribed times. [This is close to one of my 20 Tips! #3] In this way, the sacrament of Penance will be administered calmly and with genuine profit, and will not interfere with active participation in the Mass (no. 35). The same is reiterated in the Praenotanda of the Ordo Paenitentiae (no. 13), which states that: the reconciliation of penitents can be celebrated at any time and day. [Remember those people who claimed confessions couldn’t be heard during the Sacred Triduum? FAIL.]

Nevertheless this ought to be understood as a counsel [Not an imperative.] directed to the pastoral care of the faithful, who ought to be encouraged and helped to seek health of soul in the sacrament of Penance, and have recourse to it, as far as possible outside the place and time of the celebration of Mass. On the other hand, [Here we go…] this does not in any way prohibit priests, except the one who is celebrating Mass, from hearing confessions of the faithful who so desire, including during the celebration of Mass. [There it is, ladies and gentlemen.] Above all nowadays, when the ecclesial significance of sin and the sacrament of Penance is obscured in many people, and the desire to receive the sacrament of Penance has diminished markedly, pastors ought to do all in their power to foster frequent participation by the faithful in this sacrament. [In other words, this sacrament is really in crisis.  We have to do all we can to revive it.] Hence canon 986.1 of the Code of Canon law states: All to whom by virtue of office the care of souls is committed,are bound to provide for the hearing of the confessions of the faithful entrusted to them, who reasonably request confession, and they are to provide these faithful with an opportunity to make individual confession on days and at times arranged to suit them.

The celebration of the sacrament of Penance is indeed one of the ministries proper to priests. The Christian faithful, on the one hand, are not only obliged to confess their sins (cf. can. 989), but on the other hand are fully entitled to be assisted by their Pastors from the spiritual riches of the Church, especially by the word of God and the sacraments (can. 213).

[Wait for it….] Consequently, it is clearly lawful, even during the celebration of Mass, to hear confessions when one foresees that the faithful are going to ask for this ministry. In the case of concelebrations, it is earnestly to be desired that some priests would abstain from concelebrating [DID YOU GET THAT, FATHERS and BISHOPS? Don’t always concelebrate.  HEAR CONFESSIONS during the Mass! Advice from the CDW!] so as to be available to attend to the faithful who wish to receive the sacrament of Penance. It should be borne in mind, nevertheless, that it is not permitted to unite the sacrament of Penance with the Mass, making of them both a single liturgical celebration [This is done in the Novus Ordo sometimes with baptisms, for example, or even celebrations of liturgical hours such as vespers.].

Now, THERE is a novelty!

Less concelebration and more confessions DURING MASS.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

The next Synod (“walking together”) will be about the Synod. No! Really!

This is not from Eye of the Tiber or The Onion

From CNA:

Pope Francis announces a 2022 synod on synodality

Vatican City, Mar 7, 2020 / 05:00 am (CNA).- The next ordinary Synod of Bishops will be a synod on synodality, the Vatican announced March 7.

In October 2022, bishops from around the world will meet in Rome to discuss the theme: “For a synodal Church: communion, participation and mission.”

The concept of “synodality” has been a topic of frequent discussion by Pope Francis, particularly during the previous ordinary Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith, and vocational discernment in October 2018.

Synodality, as defined by the International Theological Commission in 2018, is “the action of the Spirit in the communion of the Body of Christ and in the missionary journey of the People of God.”

The term is generally understood to represent a [rigged] process of discernment, with the aid of the Holy Spirit, involving bishops, priests, religious, and lay Catholics, each according to the gifts and charisms of their vocation.

Pope Francis told the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s theological commission in November that synodality will be key for the Church in the future. [God help us all!]

“Synodality is a style, it is a walk together, and it is what the Lord expects from the Church of the third millennium,” Pope Francis said Nov. 29.

[…]

“Walking together”… to the self-licking ice cream cone stand!

 

Posted in Lighter fare, Synod, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
12 Comments