Resurrection by Daniel Mitsui

Daniel Mitsui has just about become the “artist in residence” here. He recently sent me a print of the Resurrection.

Here are a couple shots… it is still under its plastic protective cover.

I like how he riffs from Medieval illuminations.

20140331-162805.jpg

A detail.

20140331-162818.jpg

Another

20140331-162831.jpg

There is a color version, too.

Daniel is a fine Catholic artist.  Give him some support.  His prints make great gifts.  Also, you will be helping his family.  His little daughter has had a lot of medical problems and their bills are pretty daunting.  Get a print.  Help a family.  Everyone wins.

More of my posts on his artwork HERE.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
7 Comments

Of the Fishwrap and the Palaces of Bishops

Over at the National Schismatic Reporter (aka Fishwrap) they are thrashing in the chum-strewn waters of the residences of American bishops.

Those rich bishops! Stealing money from the mouths of the poor! They aren’t humble like …. like… like Pope Francis! He’s The First Pope Ever To Smile Or Kiss A Baby™ or Live In Abject Poverty In Casa Santa Marta™.

I am with Fr. Longenecker, who recently defended a good, and elegant residence for diocesan bishops.

You don’t have to live in a cardboard box under a bridge to have concern for the poor.

Nevertheless, the frenzy is fully underway now. American dioceses far and wide are rushing to defend the residences of their bishops. For example, at CWN we read: Denver archdiocese defends new $6.5 million meeting center, residence for archbishop.  Yawn.

Since Fishwrap‘s Michael Sean Winters is obsessed with Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino, Bishop of Madison (aka His Mightiness aka The Extraordinary Ordinary), whom he continually bashes (HERE and HERE and HERE – just within the last few months) as being out of touch, condescending, a real meanie, I now share a view of His Excellency’s palatial episcopal mansion’s opulent facade and elegant, graceful entrance.  Such lines!

I know.

You are now weighing whether a bishop should live in an extravagant building that has more than one story.

Anyway, I’m just trying to help Fishwrap in their research for their upcoming exposé on the luxury mansions of the rich and famous (conservative) bishops.

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
22 Comments

AUDIO: John 6

As we are in Passiontide, according to our traditional Roman calendar, and as I think about the reactions to a certain talk given by a certain Dominican sister, it occurred to me to review John 6.

As I reviewed John 6, it occurred to me that some of you might want to review it even by listening to it, or even hear it in its entirety for the first time.

So, as a little offering, here is John 6 in the Douay-Rheims translation.  I chose the archaic language version, which rings a little oddly in our modern ears, so that you would have to work a little harder to attend and grasp.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, PODCAzT | Tagged , , ,
5 Comments

ASK FATHER: Why do we call Eucharist “Bread” in Novus Ordo?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My wife who is to be received into the Church at the the Easter vigil (Deo gratias!) recently asked me why in the Novus Ordo Missae one of the options for the Memorial Acclamation is “When we eat this Bread and drink this Cup, we proclaim your Death, O Lord, until you come again.” Surely we don’t eat “Bread” at all as the substance of the bread is annihilated at consecration. [Perhaps a better way to put it is entirely changed, from one substance to another.] I thought it might be a mis-translation so I checked the Latin. I’m ashamed to say my Latin isn’t up to much but the operative word there seems to be “panem” which also means “bread” as I understand it. I did notice the word “Bread” is capitalised in English, but not in Latin, is this significant in some way? Can you please explain what’s going on? Thank you in advance.

First, I am glad that the formation your wife has received has been adequate to prompt her to ask these questions.

It is perfectly acceptable also… also… to refer to the Eucharist, the consecrated Host, as “Bread”.  Our Lord refers to Himself as “Bread of Life”.  St. Paul teaches the Corinthians in these terms:

For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself.

To speak of the Eucharist in terms of “Bread” and “cup” is to use Biblical imagery.  It is, for us, an echo consistent with the way that our earliest forebears in the Faith spoke of the Eucharistic Lord.

Many centuries later, we have deepened of our understanding of the what occurs during the celebration of the Eucharist.  We have been able to develop a technical term that goes beyond the poetic, biblical, simple imagery: transubstantiation.  Even after developing this razor sharp, philosophically inspired refinement of terminology, we still use the Biblical images in our sacred liturgical rites.  For example, St. Thomas Aquinas, in composing the Mass formulary and the Office for the Feast of Corpus Domini, includes the bread imagery:

Verbum caro, panem verum
verbo carnem efficit:
fitque sanguis Christi merum,
et si sensus deficit,
ad firmandum cor sincerum
sola fides sufficit.

The Word as Flesh makes
true bread into flesh by a word [Not just bread, but true bread.]
and the wine becomes the Blood of Christ.
And if sense is deficient
to strengthen a sincere heart
Faith alone suffices.

When we adore the Lord in the Blessed Sacrament at Exposition and Benediction we use the verse and response:

V. Panem de caelo praestitisti eis. (T.P. Alleluia)
R. Omne delectamentum in se habentem. (T.P. Alleluia)

V. Thou hast given them bread from heaven (P.T. Alleluia).
R. Having within it all sweetness (P.T. Alleluia).

In this moment we are not talking about the manna of the Old Testament.  We are talking about the Eucharistic bread, of which manna was a foreshadowing.  We we invoke the image of bread when referring to the Eucharist, we bring to the fore in our minds the whole history of salvation.  Bread figures again and again in salvation history before the Word became flesh.

Our use of biblical imagery does not counteract our more philosophical and theological grasp of the Eucharist.  Indeed, it supplements and compliments.

Use of the simpler, virtually “daily” imagery of bread and cup, or chalice, reinforces in us that the Eucharist is our nourishment as we sojourn in this vale of tears, as we march upcountry as pilgrim soldiers toward the heavenly homeland.

Over a lifetime, as Catholics, we learn to hold many concepts up in the air, as it were, as if we were jugglers.  We come more and more easily to see and think of the Eucharist in terms of Bread and Cup, as nourishment, as well as Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, as well as, sacramentum which has its effect, its res in our souls, as well as… etc.  We are able more and more easily to participate at Holy Mass as both renewed Sacrifice of Calvary as well as renewed Last Supper in the upper room.  Catholics are “both/and” believers: both Calvary and Cenacle, both Cross and Table.  We can hold in perfect balance the absolute truth of transubstantiation together with bread and wine imagery without falling into the heresy of Protestants.  For many, this doesn’t happen overnight.  It takes a while to hear and see with a Catholic ear and eye.  We converts settle into the Faith over time, each on his or her own course and schedule.   After the zeal of initial conversion and reception, then the patience and the maturing takes place, much as the new wine needs time in the barrel.

So, congratulations and I hope that helps a little.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

UPDATE: Bp. Jugis (D. Charlotte) endorses Sr. Jane Laurel and talk at High School

I have written about the incident at the High School in Charlotte, where Dominican Sister Jane Laurel gave a talk on human sexuality that produced sparked a mob reaction.  Nun UNDER The Bus and Sister explains the situation. Spittle-flecked nutty, bullying, intimidation ensue.

From LifeNews:

Charlotte diocese backs nun who gave school talk promoting Church teaching on homosexuality

CHARLOTTE, NC, April 7, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The bishop of Charlotte is backing a Dominican nun who has been at the center of a fiery controversy since last month when she gave a speech promoting Catholic teaching on sexuality to students at Charlotte Catholic High School.

After a public meeting with diocesan and school officials turned ugly, with parents and students alike shouting at administrators over what they perceived as “hateful” remarks criticizing homosexual behavior, divorce and extra-marital sex, [To think… that’s how conditioned people are now by the MSM and the “new normal”.] a spokesman for the diocese told LifeSiteNews that the nun in question, Sr. Jane Dominic Laurel, did nothing wrong and will be welcome to speak on the issue again if she chooses.

Nothing in Sister’s talk opposed Church teaching,” Diocese of Charlotte Communications Director David Hains told LifeSiteNews in an email. “Sister would be welcomed to speak in the diocese in the future.”

Hains said Bishop Peter Jugis is expected to make further public comment on the situation soon.

Sr. Laurel’s critics have complained about a section of her talk in which she discussed scientific findings related to the causes of homosexuality. [And here I thought the Church embraced science.] According to the Charlotte Observer, she was accused of using “suspect anecdotes, antiquated data and broad generalizations to demonize gays and lesbians as well as divorced and single parents.” [That’s right… if you state what the Church teaches, that homosexual acts are disordered, that’s “demonizing”.]

But one Catholic scientist says he recently heard the sister give the exact same speech she delivered to the students, and in his opinion, there is nothing in it to which a practicing Catholic could possibly object.

“I was in attendance at the same presentation when given on Long Island, NY a few months ago,” Dr. Gerard Nadal told LifeSiteNews. “In that meeting, Sister Jane gave medical and scientific data that came from reputable sources and were presented as examples of the consequences for human behavior that contravenes the moral magisterium of the Church. As a Ph.D. in medical science, and as a Catholic schooled extensively in my faith, I saw no contradictions, but rather a seamless presentation.”

Still, in light of all the controversy, Aquinas College announced in a press release Friday that Sr. Laurel has asked to take a sabbatical from her teaching and speaking duties for an indefinite amount of time.

After the sister’s speech at a school assembly last month, students at the school launched an internet petition drive demanding an apology from everyone involved with arranging the speech, which quickly garnered thousands of signatures. Some parents also initiated a letter-writing campaign to the school’s chaplain, the bishop and even the Vatican, to complain. [Complete with pitchforks and torches.]

Last week, school and diocesan officials held a public meeting to address the issue. The meeting attracted nearly 1,000 people, most of them offended by the nun’s remarks.

The Diocese of Charlotte’s newspaper, the Catholic News-Herald, reported that the meeting was acrimonious, with those who dared to speak out in support of Sr. Laurel or the Church being shouted down by an angry mob. The paper’s sources called the atmosphere “disrespectful” and “hate-filled.

[… READ THE REST THERE… several quotes of reactions, all interesting…]

“Darkness has fallen upon us with all of the attendant confusion which it brings,” Kauth continued. “Our Lord can speak to this darkness just as He did in the beginning and say, let there be light.”

To read Fr. Kauth’s full statement regarding Sr. Laurel’s presentation click here.

Contact:

Diocese of Charlotte
Phone: (704) 370-6299
chancery@charlottediocese.org

It is good to see that some sanity is being applied.

Fr Z kudos to Bp. Jugis.  Mega kudos to Sr. Jane.

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , ,
43 Comments

YOUR Sacred Triduum observances – Who, What, Where, When, How?

It may be that some of you will travel, even considerable distances, to participate in the rites of the Sacred Triduum celebrated in a worthy manner.

I have on more than one occasion over the years, as a guest celebrant for the Triduum in this or that place, met people who came to town from afar specifically for the liturgical observances at my host church.  It is not far fetched and it can be a kind of pilgrimage.

Thus, one of the readers here wrote, asking:

Would you begin a post wherein your follows could post Easter Triduum and Holy Week services? I am more interested for me and some friends in knowing about Extraordinary Form opportunities, however, some magnificent and glorious Novus Ordo events exist, such as Holy Thursday at St John’s Stamford, CT (Novus Ordo, ad orientem).  [Not to mention probably the finest, St. Agnes in St. Paul, where even all of Tenebrae is sung.]

We have for some time taken to the roads to make visits for different flavors of the Roman Rite.

So…. open combox for your news, descriptions, schedules, events for the Sacred Triduum.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
51 Comments

Just for nice: Roman Lenten images

Roman images.

First, a priest sent a fine photo of a side altar, in use, of SS. Ternità del Pelegrini.

That’s how it’s done.

And then a couple photos from NLM posted by my friend Gregory DiPippo of the Basilica of S. Nicola in Carcere, in which I was ordained a deacon.

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments

Nun UNDER The Bus

UPDATE 8 April: Bp. Jugis (D. Charlotte) endorses Sr. Jane Laurel and talk at High School

_______

You probably saw my post Sister explains the situation. Spittle-flecked nutty, bullying, intimidation ensue.

Sr. Jane Laurel, OP, gave a talk at a Catholic High School.  Hell broke loose.

If you want to sample her talks, go HERE. Her talk at the High School was “Masculinity & Femininity: Difference & Gift”.  Presentations with that title are on that website. Listen to a few.  At the High School, Sister included comments about homosexuality, divorce and single parents. Some people lost their minds. Read more here.

I suspect that what happened, to build this up into such a thing, is that parents heard vague reports – I say vague because teens are such great sources of accuracy in reporting – about her remarks from their politically-correctly conditioned children and, stung in conscience, got out the pitchforks and torches.

The nutty built up into grand mal nutty in the form of the increasingly inevitable “town hall” meeting.

Am I entirely off base here?  Did Sister actually say things that were so outrageous, so unacceptable, so lacking in truth and in charity, that the resulting furor was appropriate, proportionate and justified?  Really?  Go listen to some of her talks using that link, above.  Does it seem likely?

Now I read that Sister is going to have a sabbatical.  HERE

It looks as if Alinsky’s Rules were at work here. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. … Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Look.  This is just the starting line for some observations.

It seems to me that this sad episode is one of many which reveal the building in our midst of a mob mentality akin to that which drove the Salem Witch Trials. If you speak in public now with any clarity about the Church’s teachings on sexuality, marriage, etc., or avert to conclusions which rational people reach about the same derived from the Natural Law, you will be met with fury. “I saw Lizzie Procter speaking with the devil!” Well… bad example, since most of the people who will join the snarling pack likely don’t believe in the devil.

There is a new and twisted “normal” coalescing. This new “normal”, violating the dictates of reason, will prompt the more aggressive and ideologically driven to impose iron norms, which, when violated, will spark vicious attacks from the now easily manipulated mob.

Watching episode in Charlotte build, I had the image of one of those mobs protests a G8 meeting. In these mobs there are professional instigators, anarchists and so forth, who are dedicated to getting the crowd of the curious, the young, the dumb, the enthusiastic, etc., whipped up into a frenzy. Then, as the frenzy rises, someone pitches a garbage can through a shop window and the havoc begins.

What is happening in our society that accepts so readily the hounding to ruin of the head of some business because he says that he supports true, natural marriage and does not endorse homosexual unions?

Surely there is something of a mob mentality building, and swiftly. The speed is driven by the new phenomenon of social media arriving in your hand 24/7. It is also driven by the erosion of the ability of many to reason (thanks to decades of poor education) and incessant mass media exaltation of self-satisfaction and base carnality, which also switches off higher functions.

But there is also something of the demonic in this present movement.

Some of you readers will remember back in the 50’s and 60’s the benign anti-littering campaigns. “Don’t be a litter bug!” It was really bad to be a “litter bug”. Remember the TV ads with the weeping Indian looking at garbage along the roadside? YOU made that Indian cry when you threw your bubblegum wrapper on the ground.  It was even patriotic not to litter.  “Keep America Beautiful!”  It took a while for the campaign to get real traction, a couple decades, but, given the tools of communication at the time it was pretty successful. It was big in schools.  I’m sure that kids turned their homes into re-education camps once teachers in schools were daily pounding on their empty-skulls heads about “pollution”. That campaign was probably also an outgrowth of the early ecology movement and neo-Malthusian efforts, but, hey, cleaner streets and roads were good.

Gramsci got it right: get control of the schools and, over time, you’ll control everything else. Have an agenda? Focus on school curricula and teachers.  Extirpate anyone who doesn’t conform.  Silence any discordant voice.

The campaign that we are seeing now, however, anything but benign. It is brush fire fast and there is in it something of the demonic.

Combox moderation is ON.

Posted in I'm just askin'..., Liberals, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, The Olympian Middle, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , ,
104 Comments

ASK FATHER: Sister goes shopping while carrying the Eucharist to the sick. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Fr. Z's Pyx

From a reader…

I work at a religious supply store and yesterday a local religious sister came in and asked to be shown our selection of pyxes. I led her to the cabinet where they are kept and indicated that some of them are lined with plastic and therefore not actually appropriate for transportation of the Sacred Species. She responded that the metal pyxes are too expensive and expressed a desire to see if the pyxes fit the hosts her parish uses. [You can sense that disaster is about to strike… right?] She then removed a pyx from her pocket, and began placing hosts into one of the plastic-lined pyxes. I asked her if these were consecrated, she replied that they were. I knelt. I was confused, had no idea what to do. The first thing I said was that I didn’t think I could sell the pyx anymore since it had touched the Blessed Sacrament. [Good thinking.  You’re mind is on the right track.] However, she said that she would have to just take it then. I went to the counter and waited for her to check out while she proceeded to have a leisurely conversation with a priest who was also in the store at the time. When she finished I sold her the pyx and a few other items with as little speech as possible in deference to the Holy Presence.

My question to you, Father, is what should I do now? Should this irreverence be reported to her pastor or the bishop?

Just when you think you’ve heard everything.

Definitely, the pastor and/or the bishop should be contacted.

This would not quite rise to the level of a violation of the Blessed Sacrament spoken of in can. 1367, but is absolutely inappropriate to do, especially for someone (a religious sister, no less) with any sort of official position within the Church.

There are going to be unavoidable occasions when someone carrying the Blessed Sacrament has to stop for some business other than taking the Eucharist directly to the communicant.  Stopping because of an accident is about all that comes to mind.  But “testing out” new pyxes?!? Chatting with another customers, priest or not?!?

If one is concerned about the size of a pyx, unconsecrated hosts work just as well, BETTER as a matter of fact, because with them you are not committing the sin of sacrilege and scandalizing people!

And DO IT ON YOUR OWN TIME!

Grrrrrrrrrrr.

I contacted a couple of trusted people about this to get their reactions… to double-check myself….

A priest wrote:

I would counsel the clerk to speak with the pastor of the parish to register his dismay. He should be ready to be told “Thanks” or “What’s your problem?” This highlights the absolute horror that the use of extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion has brought upon the Church. The Holy Eucharist is treated as a commodity by ill-trained and ignorant people. This innovation has been found wanting, and needs to be abolished.

This reveals a serious deficit in training of many extraordinary ministers.  And even if it is an isolated case, repetita iuvant.  Repeated things help.  The more something is important, the more something should should be stressed.  The more sacred (or dangerous) the action, the greater the need for training.  Handling that which is sacred is dangerous, tremendum.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Wherein Fr. Z Rants, Women Religious | Tagged , , ,
75 Comments

2 Priests, 1 Sister kidnapped in Cameroon

From BBC:

Priests and nun kidnapped in Cameroon

Two Italian priests and a Canadian nun have been kidnapped by unidentified gunmen in Cameroon, Italy’s foreign ministry and media reports say.  [Lemme guess… could they be…. Mormon missionaries?  Quakers?]

Gunmen ransacked the building in the north-west of the country before taking the hostages, Italy’s Ansa agency said.

The area is close to a stronghold of militant Nigerian group Boko Haram.

The attack comes three months after a French priest was released after being kidnapped by Boko Haram in the same region and held in Nigeria.

The latest attack took place in the district of Maroua in the early hours of Saturday morning.

The gunmen were reported to have arrived by car before entering the building where the priests and the nun were staying at around 02:00 local time (01:00 GMT).

The two priests were from the Vicenza region of Italy, the Italian foreign ministry reported.

It says it has set up a crisis unit to work for their release.

One of the priests had been in Cameroon for more than six years, while the other had arrived about a year ago, Italian media reported.

Last year, seven members of a French family called Moulin-Fournier – four of them children – were abducted by Boko Haram in northern Cameroon and held hostage for two months.

From ANSA: Non si esclude che i sequestratori siano terroristi islamici di Boko Haram, attivi nel nord della Nigeria, che hanno sconfinato in Camerun.

I’m guessing either Islamic terrorists or … well… maybe they refused to criticize Mozilla Firefox fast enough?  Either way, I guessing terrorists.

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia pray for us.

 

Posted in Modern Martyrs, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , ,
16 Comments