POLL: Covering of images for 1st Passion Sunday, 5th Sunday of Lent

From this Sunday, traditionally called 1st Sunday of the Passion, it is customary to veil images in churches.

What is going on where you are?

This is a fine old tradition.  It has to do with deprivation of the senses and the liturgical dying of the Church in preparation for the Lord’s tomb and resurrection.

We are our rites.

For this 1st Sunday of the Passion (5th Sunday of Lent) I saw in church that:

View Results

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, POLLS | Tagged ,
59 Comments

ASK FATHER: Father insists I say “Amen” at Communion

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father, I receive communion on the tongue while kneeling. Recently, a priest has begun to make an issue that while I am already in the position for communion with my mouth open and tongue out, he demands a verbal “amen.” He made a scene first when my son, 10, and then I, both went for communion. Is it a mortal sin not to say “amen”?

First, if the priest “made a scene”, he should not have “made a scene”.  On the other hand, I am wondering if he did “make a scene”.  This has the feeling of exaggeration brought on by frustration, embarrassment, conflict, take your pick.

That said, in the Extraordinary Form the priest says , “Corpus Domini nostri Jesu Christi custodiat animam tuam in vitam aeternam. Amen.” The priest says “Amen”, not the communicant.

However, in the Ordinary Form of the the Roman Rite, the form of distribution of Communion is spoken by the minister says “Corpus Christi… The Body of Christ” and the communicant responds “Amen.”

The communicant responds, “Amen.”

Is it a mortal sin not to say “Amen”?  Depending on the reason why you don’t (such as defiance), it could be.

So, if you are going to kneel and receive on the tongue, in the Ordinary Form, do your part and say, “Amen.”

It isn’t difficult and it is the right thing to do.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
51 Comments

ASK FATHER: Burying “extra” Hosts after Good Friday

From a priest…

QUAERITUR:

I am a new priest. My pastor tells me that after the Good Friday
liturgy, he buries any leftover consecrated hosts, so that the
tabernacle is “fresh” for the “new beginning” of Easter. Is this a
legitimate practice? It seems suspicious.

This seems not just wrong, but very wrong, sacrilegiously wrong.

I consulted trusted canonists.

Were I in your position, I would contact your local bishop and ask him humbly if this practice constitutes a violation of:

Can. 1367 One who throws away the consecrated species or, for a sacrilegious purpose, takes them away or keeps them, incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; a cleric, moreover, may be punished with some other penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.

Of course for any penalty to be incurred, the person committing the delict has to know that it is seriously wrong and then will to do it anyway.

The combox is closed.  I will accept email from clerics on this matter.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments

VIDEO: Happy baby learns the word “happy”!

Someone sent me this video and I just had to post it.

It must be an amazing moment for parents when babies say first clear words. I got a little shiver watching this, and thinking about how our minds work, reflections as they are of God. Our Lord, the Eternal Word, born into this world a speechless child had to learn His baby words.

In any event, apart from all the machinations within the Church and the conflicts and struggles and disappointments, this might provide a bright moment in the day. Mom’s reactions are as fun as the baby’s.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Do you know what your first words were?

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged ,
25 Comments

4 April: St. Isidore of Seville, Bishop and Doctor (to which a Prayer is added)

Today is the feast of St. Isidore of Seville, Bishop and Doctor (+4 April 636). He is not to be confused with St. Isidore the Farmer. St. Isidore defended the faith against the Arian heresy, which was still around. It is amazing how tenacious heresy can be.

Some years ago there was much chat about having St. Isidore proposed as the patron saint of the internet. (NB: He is NOT, however, offically named such. Keep that in mind.) I was asked to write a prayer people could recite before using the internet. It seemed to me a good idea.

I wrote the prayer in Latin and submitted it, with a translation into English, to a bishop who gave it his approval.

This prayer is all over the same internet now (both with and without attribution!).

The experience of stumbling upon the prayer at various pages and sites, prompted me to revisit this “internet prayer”, to seek some additional language translations, and to post them all online in one place.

You will want to know why some people proposed St. Isidore for this role.

I think many proposed St. Isidore of Seville because his most notable work, the Etymologiae, a massive encyclopedic work of 448 chapters in 20 volumes indexing just about everything people thought it was important to know at the time, was rather like a primitive database. You can, of course, pray to any saint in this matter, and nothing official about any patron for the internet has been handed down from the Congregation for the Causes of Saints (which is the competent dicastery of the Holy See in those matters). Bottom line: people wanted a prayer for St. Isidore, and I wrote one. You should feel free to change the name to whatever saint you prefer. Others have proposed St. Maximilian Kolbe (+1941), St. Bernadine of Siena (+1444), St. Rita of Cascia (+1457), and the Archangel Gabriel (still around).

I am happy for people to use this prayer. I ask that you give attribution.

Also, if you can offer a translation into a language missing from those below, please send it. To email me, click HERE.

I would also like a video of the prayer in ASL, American Sign Language.

To see all the versions of the prayer which are now available, go HERE

Meanwhile, here is the English and one other as a tease:

A prayer before logging onto the internet:

Almighty and eternal God, who created us in Thine image and bade us to seek after all that is good, true and beautiful, especially in the divine person of Thine Only-begotten Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, grant, we beseech Thee, that, through the intercession of Saint Isidore, Bishop and Doctor, during our journeys through the internet we will direct our hands and eyes only to that which is pleasing to Thee and treat with charity and patience all those souls whom we encounter. Through Christ our Lord.   Amen.

KLINGON (aka Klingonese)

TlhobtaHghach qaSpa’ poSmoH’tah Internet’li

HoSghaj je reH joH’a, ‘lv chenmoHta’ ma’Daq lij voqtaHghach je maH ja’ta nej Hoch QaQ, teH, je ‘lH, Daq lij neH puqloD, ma’joH, J’H’esus K’risti, ms tlhob SoH, vegh le’ghot J’Isador’e, lalDan vumwI’neS je O’ghojmoH’neS, qaStaHvIS ma’ylt vegh Internet’li, ma’tI yotlh ma’ghopDu’ je minDu’ Daq vetlh nuq Chen Quch SoH je pop tlhej muSHa’ tlq SlQ Hoch chaH qa’neS ma’ghom. Sum K’risti ma’joH.

Internet Prayer in Klingon

Posted in Linking Back, Our Catholic Identity, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

Priest denies Sen. Durbin Holy Communion. Bp. Paprocki supports priest.

CLICK

This is from LifeSite

Illinois bishop upholds priest’s decision to deny Communion to pro-abort Sen. Dick Durbin

SPRINGFIELD, IL, April 3, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, known for his outspoken defense of the right to life and the natural family, has signaled his support for denying Communion to Catholic politicians who publicly endorse activities gravely contrary to the moral law.

The bishop wrote recently to a pro-life activist to affirm that he is upholding a diocesan priest’s decision to deny Communion to U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-IL, who has a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America and Planned Parenthood.

Paprocki’s e-mail was reported Thursday by Catholic commentator Matt Abbott.

“Senator Durbin was informed several years ago by his pastor at Blessed Sacrament Parish here in Springfield that he was not permitted to receive Holy Communion per canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law,” Paprocki wrote. “My predecessor upheld that decision and it remains in effect. It is my understanding that the senator is complying with that decision here in the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois.”

Canon 915 states that those who are “obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.”

In placing the onus on ministers of Holy Communion, canon 915 is distinct from canon 916, which places the onus on the communicant to not approach for Communion if they are “conscious of grave sin.”

Canon 915 has been at the center of the dispute in recent years over how Church leaders should deal with the plethora of Catholic politicians who vote for pro-abortion and pro-homosexual legislation.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Bp. Paprocki is going to catch hell for this.   The Fishwrap types are going to go entirely bananas.

Stop and say a prayer for him as the wolves begin to howl.

UPDATE 4 April:

Distinguished canonist Ed Peters comments on his blog In The Light Of the Law:

Today, normal is newsworthy. Really.

by Dr. Edward Peters

If we didn’t live in such morally chaotic, socially unravelling, ecclesially antinomian times, none of this would have been news.

As things are, though, many Catholic politicians do not know (or care) that advocacy of abortion is mortally sinful (CCC 2271-2273), let alone that persons in mortal sin should not approach for holy Communion (Canon 916). Many priests do not know (or wish to recall) that holy Communion is to be withheld from persons who obstinately persevere in manifestly and gravely sinful actions (Canon 915). And many bishops do not know (or want to accept) that they are bound to enforce ecclesiastical discipline in all respects, including the protection of the sacraments (Canon 392)—the most august of which is the Eucharist (Canon 897)—and are to protect the rights of their priests and see to it that they fulfill their duties (Canon 384).

Against this backdrop of confusion regarding so many basic aspects of moral order and Church law, no wonder that Bp. Paprocki’s reaffirmation of support for a pastor’s decision to withhold holy Communion from a notorious pro-abortion Catholic politician makes news.

Today, normal is newsworthy. Really.

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Brick by Brick, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
38 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can deacons request ordination in Extraordinary Form?

From a reader (seminarian?)…

QUAERITUR:

Would it be conceivable for one or more transitional deacons to request that their ordination to the priesthood be conferred with the Sacrament of Holy Orders according to the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite? Perhaps by allowing them to travel to an FSSP seminary or other community that regularly ordains priests using the 1962 books?

Yeeeeesssss… it is conceivable.  I can conceive that such a thing could happen.  I can in my wildest imagination conceive that a bishop might say “yes” to such a request.

As it stands, according to the prescriptions of Summorum Pontificum, bishops are not allowed to ordain in the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite unless for members of those institutes that have exclusive use of the older, traditional forms.

I am pretty sure that a diocesan bishop could, on his own, send his men to the FSSP for ordination.  He could write the dimissorial letters and send them off.  Of course the FSSP might not want to get involved in that. I suspect that Rome would tuck the fact away and have questions about it down the line.  The next time the the bishop was in Rome for his ad limina visit, I’d bet it would come up.  The FSSP superiors would also have to answer some questions.   But… hey… it’s possible.

A bishop would have to request permission from the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” to ordain with the old Roman Pontifical.  I suspect that questions would immediately be fired back at him requesting clarifications and so forth.

There is an old principle that I learned from my old mentor and boss Card. Mayer: you can always ask, but then you have to be content with the answer.

Look.  I was ordained a deacon by Card. Mayer, entirely in Latin, in a Roman basilica, with the Gregorian chant schola I directed singing the music, using spectacular precious vestments.  I was ordained a priest by soon-to-be St. John Paul II, entirely in Latin, in St. Peter’s Basilica, jammed with people.  Both times, Novus Ordo, of course.  Would I have liked to have been ordained with the old books?  Sure! That would have been great!  Coolest. Rite. Ehvur!  I would not, however, be any more a priest thereby.  The priestly difference between a guy like me and an FSSP priest is precisely zero.  I can also say the same about a buddy of mine who was ordained deacon by Bp. Gumbleton and priest by Archbp. Jadot!

That said, were I a transitional deacon I would be verrrrrrry hesitant to make such a request, unless I knew the bishop really well, and he knew me really well and we both were on the same page.  Seriously.  He doesn’t have to ordain me at all.  Right?

There is also another principle, it is risky to ask a question unless you know what the answer is going to be in advance.

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

ASK FATHER: Emergency baptism of an adult

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I am a Police Officer and often am in situations where people are dying or close to death. Is it improper to baptize someone who is unconscious or having a seizure because they listen to music from Hell?

I like cops, so I’ll answer this one, and briefly.

I think one should only baptize an unconscious adult in danger of death if there was some indication that he wanted to be baptized before falling into unconsciousness.

Someone in a seizure who is not in danger of death should not be baptized.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Just deal with it!

On a busy, complicated, not entirely pleasant day, I saw this and was both encouraged and amused:

Posted in Lighter fare |
15 Comments

Univ. of San Diego (‘c’atholic?) holds “drag show”, Holy See intervenes

Did you see this?

The Cardinal Newman Society (check out their feed on the sidebar of this blog) has a story about a “drag show” at the University of San Diego, which is supposed to be a Catholic school.

My emphases

Vatican Says Univ. of San Diego Drag Show Caused Scandal, New Show Planned Next Week

The Vatican’s Congregation for Education has said that a drag show that occurred last year on the campus of the University of San Diego (USD) caused “scandal,” according to a letter revealed by the group Alumni for a Catholic USD.
Nevertheless, the student organization PRIDE at USD will again be hosting a drag show next week called “Celebration of Gender Expression: Supreme Drag Superstar” on the campus of the Catholic institution, according to the group’s Facebook site.
“Transgender & Transsexual? Gender expression & gender identity? Drag queen & drag king? What do these terms mean?,” the group asks. “At this Changemaker event, we’ll explore these questions and how they impact the USD community and our lives. We will celebrate our diversity and the inclusion of *everyone* in our community. Join PRIDE for an evening of music, pageantry, and fabulosity!”
The official letter from the Congregation for Education was in response to communication from attorney Charles LiMandri, who founded Alumni for a Catholic USD, and Thomas McKenna, founder and president of Catholic Action for Faith and Family, who filed petitions with the Vatican to review the situation.
In the letter, the Congregation stated, “in view of the gravity of the case, it is worth mentioning that in light of the show and the scandal that it caused, this congregation intends to act through administrative channels to the competent ecclesiastical authority in San Diego.
The drag show at USD was first held in 2012 and repeated in 2013. LiMandri, a past president of the USD Alumni Association, originally went to the University with his complaint about the event, saying that “it was not in line with Catholic principles nor the Catholic values and vision of the University’s founders.”
But USD defended the drag show and released a statement in 2013 saying, “The event supports the Church’s teaching on the innate dignity of the human person, and by illustrating cross-dressing, it does not promote either behavior or lifestyle that is contrary to the teachings of the Church.” The Congregation’s letter would seem to contradict the University’s position.
McKenna, who attended both events with students, said, “I witnessed many examples of behavior and statements on moral issues which contradicted or ignored magisterial teachings.”
LiMandri and McKenna said they decided to make the Congregation’s statement public after consulting with Vatican officials, when it was learned that the third annual drag show is scheduled for April 10, 2014.
They have also written to the University president again this year, asking that the show be cancelled.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, Sin That Cries To Heaven, You must be joking! | Tagged , ,
22 Comments