o{]:)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail
LOGIN


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • His Hermeneuticalness and Vatican webpages
  • 14 Oct: S. St. Paul, St. Augustine's - The Argument
  • Fr. Bux responds to the "not enough Scripture" argument against TLM
  • Benedict opens the synod
  • A Sunday Mass
  • Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei" - BIG NEWS!
  • TLM Mass for Pius XII rescheduled
  • QUAERITUR: Spanish biretta

  • Recent Comments:

    • John Womack: *Remaining registered as a Democrat in order to influence the party is a defensible choice. By all...
    • John Womack: *John Womak: For your analogy to work, you would have to position Wilberforce as a member of a...
    • DoB: Chris Altieri, I’m not sure Dcns reservations can so easily be explained away. If the working document is...
    • Felix: 1. perhaps the greatest problem with the Novus Ordo readings is that most (almost all the laity) have...
    • Jordanes: Louis E. said: scientific fact,approached with a scientific eye rather than on a mission to find backing...
    • Louis E.: Avecrux, scientific fact,approached with a scientific eye rather than on a mission to find backing for the...
    • Tom Lanter: Fr. Z. Great view, wish I had been kneeling next to the photographer with my camera in hand. JMJ Tom...
    • Anne: This is the funniest thread I’ve ever seen on WDTPRS. It seems some folks are so young they actually do...
    • Fr. John Zuhlsdorf: Anne: I want to add something. Bishops have in a very serious way the cura animarum.  This...
    • Anne: Rick, in Bishop Vasa\’s diocese next door that pro-choice EMOE would have been released from all duties...

  • VOTE!
    My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!

    Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar



    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!






















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner


    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
  • 4 October 2006

    Stupidest headline ever?

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 3:09 pm

    Biretta tip to Amy  o{]:¬)   who alerted us to the story in the Times which purports to deal with the Church’s continual exploration of the theological opinion commonly called Limbo.  Ask yourself if this isn’t one of the stupidest headlines, and premises, you will ever read about something Catholic:

    Pope tries to win hearts and minds by saving souls of unbaptised babies
    By Ruth Gledhill and Richard Owen

    THE Pope will cast aside centuries of Catholic belief later this week by abolishing formally the concept of limbo, in a gesture calculated to help to win the souls of millions of babies in the developing world for Christ. ...

    Okay.  Anyone else have a suggestion as to why Pope Benedict XVI would get into such a question?

    • • • • • •

    4th Joyful Mystery: The Presentation

    CATEGORY: Patristic Rosary Project — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 2:43 pm

    We continue our Patristic Rosary Project today with the:

    4th Joyful Mystery: The Presentation

    We are made in God’s image and likeness and Christ came into the world to reveal man for fully to him (GS 22). We are radically in unity with Christ and, through Him, with each other. In this light, read the words of 3rd century Alexandria writer Origen (+254):

    So, when He died, we died with Him, and when He rose, we rose with Him. Likewise, we were also circumcised along with Him. After His circumcision, we were cleansed by a solemn purification. Hence we have no need at all for a circumcision of the flesh. you should know that He was circumcised for our sake. Listen to Paul’s clear proclamation. He says, "For in Him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, and you have come to fullness of life in Him, who is the head of all rule and authority. In Him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh in the circumcison of Christ. And you were buried with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead." (Col 2:9-12) Therefore His death, His resurrection and His circumsion took place for our sake. [Homilies on the Gospel of Luke 14.1]

    We discern in the Gospels an interesting pattern. The Second Person empties Himself of glory and becomes incarnate of the Virgin Mary. The eternal Word becomes a speechless child. He is lain upon the wood of the crib. He is pierced with metal and He sheds His Blood for our sake. The Incarnate Word Jesus Christ empties Himself of glory and enters His Passion. He stands mute before Pilate and the soliders. He is lain upon the wood of the Cross. He is pieced with metal and sheds His Blood for our sake. In each case He is bound to the Temple, first in His Presentation, finally when the lambs (which foreshadow Him) are being slaughtered in the Temple. All of this is for our sake.

    In the Presentation Mary and Jesus are seen to be obedient to the Law. Here is Venerable Bede (+735):

    Mary, God’s blessed mother and a perpetual virgin, was, along with the Son she bore, most free from all subjection to the law. The law says that a woman who "had received seed" (Lev 12:2 LXX) and given birth was to be judged unclean and that after a long period she, along with the offspring she had borne, were to be cleansed by victims offered to God. So it is evident that the law does not describe as unclean that woman who, wihtout receiving man’s seed, gave birth as a virgin. Nor does it teach that she had to be cleansed by saving sacrificial offerings. But as our Lord and Savior, who in His divinity was the one who gave the law, when He appeared as a human being, willed to be under the law…. So too His blessed mother, who by a singular privilege was above the law, nevertheless did not shun being made subject to the principles of the law for the sake of showing us an example of humility. [Homilies on the Gospels 1.18]

    Some of the Fathers, explicitly St. Augustine (+430), argued that heretics reject the Incarnation. St. Jerome (+420) does as well and he makes his point in the context of talking about the Presentation:

    All heretics have gone astray by not undestanding the mystery of His nativity. The statement "he who opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord" is more applicable to the special nativity of the Savior than to that of all men, for Christ alone opened the closed doors doors of the womb of virginity, which nevertheless remained permanently closed. This is the closed east door, through which only the high priest enters and leaves, and nevertheless it is always closed. [Against the Pelagians 2.4]

    There is a lot going on there. Jerome connects the birth of the Lord with the High Priest going into the Temple on the day the lambs are to be slain. He speaks of the East. This makes me think about the exit of the priest from the sacristy and his entrance into the sanctuary to go unto the altar for Mass. He goes from the sacristy, like Christ from the womb, into the area partitioned away from the nave of the church. He goes into the place reserved for alter Christ, who acts in the liturgy in the place of the Head of the Body, the Mystical Person of Christ. The nave is the place designated for those who speak and act as the Body of Christ’s Mystical Person. Together, sanctuary and nave form the body of the whole church. Together, priest and people form the Church, just as Christ the Head and Christ the Body are, as Augustine says, Christus totus, Christ whole entire.

    In the Temple, Christ is presented as the Law prescribes. Standing by is the figure who embodies prophecy and priesthood, old Simeon. Ephrem the Syrian (+373):

    Simeon presented our Lord, and in Him he present two gifts he had, so that what had been given to Moses in the desert was passed on by Simeon in the temple. Because our Lord is the vessel in which all fullness dwells (Col 2:9), when Simeon presented him to God, he poured our both of these upon him: the priesthood from his hands and prophecy from his lips. The priesthood had always been on Simeon’s hands, because of ritual purifications. Prophecy, in fact, dwelt on his lips because of revelations. When both of these saw the Lord of both of these, they were combined and were poured into the vessel that could accommodate them both, in order to contain priesthood, kingship, and prophecy. [Homily on Our Lord 53.1-54.1]

    Priesthood and prophecy are the cause of joy, but, just as the Cross precedes resurrection, they also are the source of pain. Simeon reveals to the Blessed Virgin in the moment of joy that she will experience great pain. Pain of spirit by which she experience the Passion of her Son. Here is the bishop of Milan, St. Ambrose (+397):

    "And a sword will pierce through your own soul." Neither Scripture nor history tells us that Mary departed this life by a violent death. For it is not the soul but the body that can be pierced by a material sword. This, therefore, proves that Mary was not unaware of the heavenly mystery: "For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and spirit, of joints and marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart." (Heb 4:12) God’s Word exposes the thoughts and intents of the heart, because all things are open and naked to the eyes of Mary’s Son, to whom the secrets of our conscience are visible. [Exposition of the Gospel of Luke 2.61]

    And let us not forget the person of Anna. Origen has an interesting note about her presence at this mysterious event:

    Because it was necessary that women too should be saved, after Simeon there came a woman who was a prophet. Scripture says of her, "And Anna was a prophetess, a daughter of Phanuel, from the tribe of Asher." How beautiful the order is! The woman did not come before the man. First, came Simeon, who took the child and held Him in his arms. Then came the woman. Her exact words are not recorded. But the account says in general terms that "she gave priase to the Lord and spoke about him to everyone who was awaiting the redemption of Jerusalem." [Homilies on the Gospel of Luke 17.9]

    The Presentation, with its dynamics of purification and of circumcision, of Law and of ritual purity and of blood, are perhaps hard for us to grasp in this day of egalitarianism. However, God’s ways are strange to us always, perhaps more so today in a desacralized society. Men and women are different, and have different roles in life and in the history of salvation. The Presentation underscores that this is as true now as it ever was. The point is this: who knows what it all means, but it is so; who knows why it is that way, but men and women, equally God’s image and equal in diginity, are given different and complimentary tasks.

    Another thing to notice in the Presentation is that age plays a role. We have the very youngest in the Person of Jesus, those who are in the prime of life, Mary and Joseph, and the elderly Simeon and Anna. Ambrose writes:

    Anna, who, by reason of her years of widowhood and her virtues, is set before us as wholly worthy of belief, announces that the Redeemer of all people has come…. Not without purpose, however, does he make mention of the eighty-four years of her widowhood, because both the seven twelves and the two forties seemed to imply a number that is sacred. [Exposition of the Gospel of Luke 2.62]

    The mystery of the Presentation speaks to us all and its impact in the midst of joy embraces us all within the bloody Sacrifice of the Cross.

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress