The 2007 Weblog Awards nominations are open until today, I think.
Perhaps WDTPRS should be involved? I noticed some rather odd sites nominated.
About this blog…
“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
ABORTION PILL RESCUE NETWORK
Everyone, work to get this into your parish bulletins and diocesan papers.
Polls
Loading ...
Donate using VENMO
GREAT BEER from Traditional Benedictine Monks in Italy
CLICK and say your daily offerings!
A Daily Prayer for Priests
Do you have a faithful Catholic website that needs competent and reliable tech support?
NEW OPPORTUNITY – 10% off with code: FATHERZ10
Fr. Z’s VOICEMAIL
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265YOUR RECENT COMMENTS
on How can the “four camps” in the Church be reconciled? : ““ liberals want a Catholicism where the zeitgeist is the pope” and “ the hyperpapalists want a Catholicism that is…”
on How can the “four camps” in the Church be reconciled? : “What will happen is what happened in mainline Protestantism — the institutionalists will wind up with the property. This isn’t…”
on How can the “four camps” in the Church be reconciled? : “Can’t I just be Catholic? Why do I have to be part of a camp?”
on How can the “four camps” in the Church be reconciled? : “Camps 1-3 are facially absurd. 2 and 3 more than 1, though. 2 and 3 are essentially not even Catholic…”
on How can the “four camps” in the Church be reconciled? : ““the sedevacantists want a Catholicism that only has a perfect pope” Incorrect. Sedevacantists want a Catholicism that has an actual…”
on “This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops. ” Prepare for a rough ride.: “Peter Max isn’t dead and he’s fabulous.”
on Wolves v. Bear, Windswept House, and the Belgian Waffle Bishops.: “@cajunpower Perhaps they believe that there will be a miraculous solution to an intractable problem. There are a number of…”
on “This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops. ” Prepare for a rough ride.: “Let’s just be blunt. Men who have pledged themselves to celibacy want the blessing of the church to violate the…”
on “This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops. ” Prepare for a rough ride.: “I thought Peter Max was dead.”
on “This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops. ” Prepare for a rough ride.: “@Sprouting Thomas “Hipocracy’s the one where the horses are in charge, right” That would be hippocracy with two P’s, as…”
on Wolves v. Bear, Windswept House, and the Belgian Waffle Bishops.: “The complete lack of urgency from anyone in the hierarchy who is orthodox is highly concerning to me. Do they…”
on Wolves v. Bear, Windswept House, and the Belgian Waffle Bishops.: “I believe this is what the Overman Window is about. Keep moving the window and eventually ANYTHING is acceptable. For…”
on Wolves v. Bear, Windswept House, and the Belgian Waffle Bishops.: “Following that line of reasoning, blessing of “throuples” and other polyamorous associations will be introduced in about a decade. They…”
on “This has the logo of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops. ” Prepare for a rough ride.: “Thank you Dave P! Yes, listening sessions! That was what came to my mind too. Our parish has recently been…”
This REALLY helps! And it’s great coffee (and tea)
I use this when I travel both in these USA and abroad. Very useful. Fast enough for Zoom. I connect my DMR (ham radio) through it. If you use my link, they give me more data. A GREAT back up.
This blog has to earn its keep!
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful.
That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
Yes, Fr. Z is taking ads…
Use the coupon code...
fatherz10
Be a “Zed-Head”!
CHALLENGE COINS!
My "challenge coin" for my 25th anniversary of ordination in 2016.
Want one? I do exchanges with military and LEOs, etc.
PLEASE RESPOND. Pretty pleeeease?
Loading ...This is really useful when travelling… and also when you aren’t and you need backup internet NOW! I use this for my DMR “Zednet” hotspot when I’m mobile. It’s a ham radio thing.
If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
WDTPRS POLL
Loading ...Fr. Z’s stuff is everywhere
Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
GREAT causes to support
Help Monks in Wyoming (coffee – UPDATED LINK) and Norcia (beer) and the wonderful "Soap Sisters" of Summit, NJ!
Please follow me on Twitter!
I nominated your blog, Father.
It doesn’t matter who wins; WE know which one OUR favorite blog! :-))
Jack007
I think it is important that dependable Catholic blogs have a good showing.
Actually, Father, you are in 3rd place in the “Best Religion Blog” category!
Unfortunately, it has your old address:
http://www.bloggerschoiceawards.com/blogs/show/4131
You might be able to contact them, claim the blog, and update the links.
RS
Who’s voting for Fr. Z?
W D T P R S has just been bumped up to 2nd Place when I checked it just now.
Everyone: Kindly vote it you haven’t!
I just voted Father. However after voting I received a message indicating I did not use “comment authentication services??” Other people may be having similar problems. I have never seen this before and I am concerned that if today is the end of the voting
mine and perhaps other peoples votes may not be counted.
This is the message:
Thank you for commenting.
Since you did not use one of the available comment authentication services, your comment is being held for approval by moderators. Normally your comment will be approved within a few hours, but in some cases the delay can be up to 12 hours. Do not submit your comment again! Your comment will be approved (assuming it’s not spam or otherwise inappropriate) and posted shortly. To avoid this message in the future sign into the site with one of the supported authentication methods or register as a commenter. The Weblog Awards recommends MyOpenID for all your OpenID needs.
Return to the original entry.
Roman Sacristan is looking at a different blog award site (“Blogger’s Choice Awards”) than Fr. Z is citing (“Weblog Awards”).
There are probably several such operations going on, so I don’t put much stock in them: who’s to say that one or the other has substantial credibility?
Actually, people keep leaving duplicate comments to nominate Father.
The instructions say that one nomination is enough, and rather than leaving a “me too” comment, just use the + button to vote for the nomination you wish to vote for.
Seumas, thank you for the explaination. Hopefully everyone will go over there and vote.
Can anyone nominate a blog that opens up for debate the question of whether a *woman* can truly be a “Doctor of the Church” . . . with a straight face? How can such a blog even be taken seriously?
And, you wonder why chancery-folk look askance at Catholics who promote Latin and liturgy and ritual? Because their experience has been that those sorts of Catholics often harbor a pre-conciliar mentality of closemindedness and exclusion.
Fr. Z, you owe an apology for even raising that question.
And, you wonder why chancery-folk look askance at Catholics who promote Latin and liturgy and ritual? Because their experience has been that those sorts of Catholics often harbor a pre-conciliar mentality of closemindedness and exclusion.
It is certainly true that women are excluded from the priesthood.
Is it your opinion that Jesus Christ, in founding His Church with a male priesthood, “harbored a pre-conciliar mentality of closedmindedness and exclusion?” – And do those same chancery-folk look askance at Our Lord for that reason?
Matthew: Fr. Z, you owe an apology for even raising that question.
Piffle.
People now understand a great deal more about the issue now, and what sort of fellow Williamson is.
I think Bp Williamson raised a very interesting question. Having said that, I disagree with his conclusion and think he has not understood the article from the Summa that he cited.
*Piffle.
People now understand a great deal more about the issue now, and what sort of fellow Williamson is.*
Since you already identified him as an excommunicate, you made clear what sort of fellow he is.
The problem is this: You *seriously* entertained his argument, even noting that he had a point with his citation of the scripture from St. Paul.
To even raise the question of whether a woman, a f-eee-male, could be a Doctor of the Church is simply stupefying — which only reinforces the stereotype that those who are conservative about the liturgy are also conservative (in a bad way) about other issues.
Any wonder why chancery-folk are trying to minimize the effect of “Summorum Pontificum”? They think that such narrow attitudes go hand-in-glove with the Old Mass.
Piffle?
I guess, your next debate will be whether the indigenes of South America have souls and should be baptized . . . or, do not and should be enslaved. Discuss.
Roman Sacristan is looking at a different blog award site (“Blogger’s Choice Awards”) than Fr. Z is citing (“Weblog Awards”).
Ooops. Sorry. Completely missed that.
Matthew: I guess, your next debate will be whether the indigenes of South America have souls and should be baptized . . . or, do not and should be enslaved. Discuss.
Okay… here we go.
That’s just dumb and you’ve missed the point. See ya!