The Times: China repents and seeks to woo Pope

The Times has an interesting piece today about the Chinese possibly doing an about-face on a future visit from Pope Benedict XVI.

My emphases and comments.

From The Sunday Times
February 17, 2008
China repents and seeks to woo Pope
Michael Sheridan, Far East Correspondent and John Follain

TEMPTED by the prize of a historic visit to China by Pope Benedict XVI, the nation’s leaders have authorised a renewed effort in confidential discussions with the Vatican to heal their rift and inaugurate diplomatic ties.  [Isn’t it interesting that the great Cardinal Zen just got a new coadjutor for Hong Kong?  Will His Eminence have a little more free time?]

The talks have intensified over recent months, leading some diplomatic observers in Beijing to believe the Chinese may be seeking to announce a deal before the Olympic Games in August.  [What happens after the Games are over, and the PRC doesn’t need to work so hard to make sure they are a huge success?]

Liu Bainian, the de facto head of Beijing’s official Patriotic Church, has said on several occasions that he would like to welcome the Pope to China once an agreement has been reached.

While the Vatican says it has received no formal invitation, observers say Liu’s words would have been uttered only with approval from the highest levels.

The announcement of mutual recognition and a papal visit would be a propaganda coup for China[Yes, it sure would.  That is what this is about.] It would counter the negative publicity that has stunned Beijing recently, culminating in the decision by Steven Spielberg, the film director, to end his involvement with the Olympics over China’s policies in Sudan.

“The contacts are going ahead and we are somewhat optimistic,” a senior Vatican official said.

Both sides have maintained the utmost discretion, but sources close to the discussions, held in government buildings in Beijing, said they had reached a detailed and businesslike stage.

The senior Vatican official said any idea of a papal visit before the Games start on August 8 was “very unrealistic.” However, diplomats say the mere announcement of an agreement and a future visit would be enough to hand a public relations gift to China’s leaders.

The scene for a potential reconciliation between the Roman Catholic Church and the world’s largest officially atheist state has been set by a series of carefully managed moves.

There are at least 10m Catholics in China but their congregations are divided between the official Patriotic Association and an underground church whose members have endured martyrdom and imprisonment since the communist revolution in 1949.

Last June the Pope addressed a letter to Chinese Catholics in which he praised the devotion of the clandestine church but also urged reconciliation and unity among Christians.

The letter reiterated the need for obedience to the Vatican, which some officials in Beijing interpreted favourably as a sign that the Pope wanted to bring the underground clergy into line for a change in policy.

In September the Vatican and China appeared to have agreed on the appointment of a new Bishop of Beijing, Li Shan. His installation was a signal that an accommodation could be reached on the most difficult issue between Rome and Beijing, the power to appoint clergy.

In 1951 the Communist party’s central committee made Chinese control of the church a fundamental tenet of its rule, stating that “foreign invaders and spies in religion must be rooted out”.

On December 18, 2007, the politburo convened for what party historians say was its first meeting wholly devoted to a collective study session on religion. President Hu Jintao and the most powerful men in China sat through two expert presentations explaining Christianity and traditional Chinese beliefs.

In its Chinese-language report Xinhua, the state news agency, gave a dispassionate account of the proceedings with none of the customary abuse of religion as a feudal remnant or an opiate of the people. Equally unprecedented were Hu’s own remarks to the meeting, which diplomats say were probably intended for scrutiny by the Vatican.

“The party and government shall reach out to religious believers in difficulties and help them through their problems,” he said. “We shall fully understand the new problems and challenges to manage religious affairs so that we can do it right.”

The president acknowledged that religions had been a constant presence in the nation and praised the role they could play in social stability and harmony.

The pace quickened in late January when Liu Jianchao, the foreign ministry’s spokesman, said: “China is constantly thinking hard about improving the relationship with the Vatican. We have already made a lot of effort and we are willing to keep in touch, talk to the Vatican and actively seek approaches to improve relations.”

There have also been silent signals from the Vatican. It has made it known that Cardinal Joseph Zen of Hong Kong, long the fiercest critic of the official church and an outspoken advocate of democracy and freedom, is to retire in just over a year.

Zen is said by church sources in Hong Kong to have argued for extreme caution and against any haste in making a deal with China. But some in the Vatican see the greatest opportunity to bring Christianity to China since the days of the first Jesuit missionaries centuries ago.  [Naive?]

The Pope’s diplomats have also made it clear that the other principal obstacle to mutual recognition – the Vatican’s link to Taiwan – can be resolved.

To the great dismay of many Chinese Catholics, the Vatican is prepared as part of an eventual settlement to move its embassy from Taipei to Beijing.

“There is no problem with breaking relations with Taiwan and we are happy not to interfere [in China’s internal affairs], but we have a duty to spread the values of the gospel,” a senior Vatican official said.

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in SESSIUNCULA. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Jef says:

    When they say a “a senior Vatican official” would that be in a similar capacity as Fr Finigan had recently as papal spokesman?

  2. Matt Q says:

    Is there another Neville Chamberlain at work in the Vatican?

  3. Jim says:

    I would be very careful in labeling these efforts as naive, or the work of a Neville Chamberlain – unless you’re willing to apply those terms to the Holy Father himself. This diplomatic endeavor is a top priority, and doesn’t move without his explicit approval.

  4. Frederick Jones says:

    We all know what happened when the Catholic Church signed a concordat with Hitler. He got the prestige, and then failed to observe its terms. Catholic organisations were dissolved, and Catholic Youth organisations became part of the Hitler Youth and the BDM. A worthy attempt to achieve a measure of toleration from a totalitarian state was a disastrous failure. How do we know that the Chinese Government will keep any agreement? Fortunately a German Pope , who himself had to endure a totalitarian regime, should be well aware of the dangers.

  5. roydosan says:

    Abandoning the ROC for the PRC would be an absolutely disgraceful move. What will the Holy See gain by embracing a country that is the epitomy of the culture of death. The Holy See should do the only morally correct thing and that is to keep its embassy in Taipei.

Comments are closed.