"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
What is it that we’re seeing in the Great Roman’s photo?
Often times, guessing the photograph is more difficult than solving the chess puzzle. The Holy Wall of some church?
Generally, I can identify the picture of the day. But, I am entirely uncertain as to what this is.
I am tempted to tell you what the photo is as a reward for solving the chess puzzle.
Anyone? Mate in 2? (It’s not easy… until you see it.)
Don’t worry… I will tell you what the photo is. I’m just … avoiding spoilers!
Yeah, that’s right! That’s what I’m doing! “No spoilers!”
That looks like the slab of marble on which the body of St. Lawrence was laid after his death by being roasted on a gridiron.
If only I knew something about chess,
I’d take a guess.
But I don’t.
So I won’t.
Cuz it’d be a mess.
1. Qb3+ Ke5 (only field not under attack by the white king, queen or, yes, pawn).
2. Qd4++.
The queen herself is protected by the king, gives check, and disallows d5 (together with the king), back to d6, e4 (together with the bishop), f4, and the king can’t capture the bishop protected by the pawn, nor the pawn protected by the bishop, nor his own piece. Neat.
Qb8 to b6;
Kd6 to e5;
Qb6 to b5. Mate.
In response to the proposed chess solutions – Qb6 can be met with cxb6. Blunders the queen. So I assume the correct solution is something else, but it’s not coming to me yet.
I don’t know how to play chess. Re the photo — looks like bullet holes.
1. Qc8
if … fxe6, 2. Qxe6#
if … Ke5, 2. Qxc7#
if … Ke6, 2. Qd7#
I think that is all the moves black can make
Yes, Qb3 was a blunder. Thanks.
In JonPatrick’s solution, 1. … Ke6 is not possible (that would mean capturing the pawn, but it’s protected). What is possible, and you probably meant, is 1. … Kc6, but then 2. Qd7+ would be followed by 2. … Kb6 or Kb7.
The choice of 1. Qc8 is interesting, though, but there is one option where mate is in more than two:
1. … fxe6 2. Qxe6++ as you mention.
1. … Ke5 2. Qxc7++ as you mention.
1. … Kc6 2. Qb4++
1. … c6 2. Qc8+ (or identically Qc7+) Ke5 3. Qd4++.
For the latter option, I cannot see how even the queen can put both the king on d6 and the escape field e5 under attack.
Aaah!
1. … c6 2. Qb8++.
Now if she were on the diagonal, but she’s unprotected and under attack by the king on c7… She can simply go back.
1. Qb5 pins the King and forces c6 as well
2. Qc5++
Dear DCLex,
I think you mean Kc6, and that would indeed be mate by 2. Qc5++, but Kc6 isn’t forced. There’s also 1. … Ke5 with, as far as I see, no mate at the second.