A new Papal Almoner

The new Papal Almoner, His Excellency Most Reverend Konrad Krajewski was consecrated bishop at the Altar of the Chair in St. Peter’s Basilica by His Eminence Giuseppe Bertello, President of the Governorate of Vatican City State, presided as consecrator with the two co-consecrators, Archbishop Piero Marini, President of the Pontifical Committee for International Eucharistic Congresses, and Władysław Ziólek, Bishop emeritus of Łódź. 10 cardinals, 45 bishops, 300 priests were there.

So was the Pope.

The Holy Father also imposed hands on the new bishop.  He wasn’t one of the consecrators.

He remained in his street cloths and just put on a stole.

Posted in Francis | Tagged , ,
24 Comments

BOOK RECOMMENDATION: David Kupelian’s The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised As Freedom.

How have we gotten to the point we are at with so many of our societal problems… so quickly?

The changes seem coordinated, truly evil, and unstoppable.

A while back I recommended a book by David Kupelian called The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised As Freedom.

This is a helpful book, and i have mentioned it before.  Even though it only has a couple chapters on the media, which is my focus these days. Kupelian’s book explains a lot.

US Kindle HERE.

UK book HERE.

It references these USA, but it is surely useful for a UK reader as well.

A friend sent me a link to a blog that has a panicky diatribe against the book.  HERE

Here is a sample:

Churches ‘on fire’ over “Marketing of Evil”
Posted on July 28, 2012 by Jean
What a surprise awaited me on this one! I thought somebody’s figured out how churches have been duped into buying into anti-gay and no-abortion ideas, all used to divide humanity and create hatred!

[…]

The post goes on to lament that the book is being bought by the cart loads by protestants and organizations are using it as a tool for their ministry.

The book is not written from a Catholic perspective, but it remains useful. I recommend it again. This could be a good book for a young people’s (not children’s) study group, for example.

If you get it, please use my link, above.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, REVIEWS, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
5 Comments

More Starbuck’s hypocrisy

Here is a lesson in deep hypocrisy. As you peruse the following, consider Starbuck’s corporate support of pro-abortive forces, especially where he talks about being used.

From the head of Starbucks:

An Open Letter from Howard Schultz, ceo of Starbucks Coffee Company

Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Posted by Howard Schultz, Starbucks chairman, president and chief executive officer

Dear Fellow Americans,

Few topics in America generate a more polarized and emotional debate than guns. In recent months, Starbucks stores and our partners (employees) who work in our stores have been thrust unwillingly into the middle of this debate. That’s why I am writing today with a respectful request that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas.

[…]

Recently, however, we’ve seen the “open carry” debate become increasingly uncivil and, in some cases, even threatening. Pro-gun activists have used our stores as a political stage for media events misleadingly called “Starbucks Appreciation Days” that disingenuously portray Starbucks as a champion of “open carry.” To be clear: we do not want these events in our stores. Some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction, including soliciting and confronting our customers and partners.

For these reasons, today we are respectfully requesting that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas—even in states where “open carry” is permitted—unless they are authorized law enforcement personnel.  [So, it’s not “You are forbidden to bring your CCW in here. It’s “Pretty please with cream and sugar in it.”]

I would like to clarify two points. First, this is a request and not an outright ban.

[…]

There’s more of this flaccid blather over there.

Let’s not forget Starbucks support of same-sex marriage. HERE

Everyone.  Please buy…

[CUE MUSIC]

… Mystic Monk Coffee!

UPDATE:

A brilliant pasquinade from the tweetosphere:

Got kicked out of a gun shop for open-carrying a Starbucks.

— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) September 18, 2013

 

Posted in Liberals | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

QUAERITUR: What would happen were the Pope to celebrate publicly the Extraordinary Form?

From a reader:

What do you think would the effect be of a public Papal Mass in the Extraordinary Form, if were ever to happen?

The quick answer is that it would send a strong message that a) it is important to interpret the Second Vatican Council in continuity with our past and b) that the provisions of Summorum Pontificum are here to stay.

However, let’s break this down further.  What would such an action really prompt?

Had Benedict XVI celebrated a public Extraordinary Form Mass, the effect would have been for liberals to depict him in even stronger terms as a theological troglodyte, desperate for nostalgia because he cannot handle the “real world” in which he preferred to cover up pedophile priests and promote theological and liturgical reactionary trends. Meanwhile some traddies would have found fault with some minor detail of the Papal Mass, and would have used that as a reason to disparage him even more.

Were Francis to say public Mass in the Extraordinary Form, it would hurt his reputation with the liberals, but it would be a shot in the arm for conservatives and most traditionalists. Again, though, some traddies would find fault with some minor detail of the Papal Mass, and would use that as a reason to disparage him even more.

I’ll leave the combox open, but I’ve turned on the moderation queue.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Benedict XVI, Francis, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
46 Comments

September Ember Alert!

With the arrival of mid-September, and the Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross (14 Sept) we come around again to our Ember Days.  The September Ember Days this year are today, Wednesday 18 Sept, Friday 20 and Saturday 21.

More on Ember Days, HERE.

Keep in mind that Ember Days were times of penance.  Perhaps you could fast and abstain for some good intention on these days.  This is also the time of year when 40 Days for Life begins.

If memory serves, the newer Ordo – for the Novus Ordo – mentions something about the custom of Ember Days, but it does so in such a vague way that no one might be prompted to do anything with it.  I wonder: is there still a mention of Ember Days in the Ordo for the Ordinary Form?

20130917-172548.jpgI think I’ll get some tempura on Friday.

In the 16th c. Spanish and Portuguese missionaries settled in Nagasaki, Japan.  From their interest in inculturation and out of sensitivity for the ways of the people, they tried to make meatless meals for Embertide, which is a fast time.  They started deep-frying shrimp.  The Japanese ran with and developed it to perfection.  This is “tempura,” again from the Latin term for the Ember Days“Quatuor Tempora“.

In the meantime, do you know the mnemonic for the times of year of the Ember Days?

“Lenty, Penty, Crucy, Lucy”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
16 Comments

Antietam and our future

Today is the 151st anniversary of the Battle of Antietam.

We may have to have a civil war in the Church, but may God preserve our nation from another bloody civil war, for any reason, internal or sparked by external enemies or natural disasters.

From History.com:

By the time the sun went down, both armies still held their ground, despite staggering combined casualties–nearly 23,000 of the 100,000 soldiers engaged, including almost 4,000 dead. McClellan’s center never moved forward, leaving a large number of Union troops that did not participate in the battle. On the morning of September 18, both sides gathered their wounded and buried their dead. That night, Lee turned his forces back to Virginia. His retreat gave President Lincoln the moment he had been waiting for to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, a historic document that turned the Union effort in the Civil War into a fight for the abolition of slavery.

Last year was the 150th anniversary.  HERE

The Sunken Road - "Bloody Lane"

Posted in Lighter fare, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
19 Comments

Who ordered that military installations should be “gun free zones”?

My heart goes out to those poor people who were killed and injured at the Navy Yard and to their families.  Some questions have to be asked.

I was sent this link to PJ Media, which has an interesting bit of information relative to the hideous Navy Yard Massacre.

Flashback: US Military Bases are ‘Gun Free Zones’ Because Democrats Decreed Them To Be

After Nidal Hasan killed 13 and wounded more than 30 in November 2009, John R. Lott wrote about one of the craziest policies to come out of the Clinton era: making military bases “gun free zones.”

Yes, that’s correct. In 1993, President Bill Clinton decreed that US military personnel were to surrender the Second Amendment rights that they swear an oath to support and defend. Lott, writing in 2009, called for that policy to be ended.

Shouldn’t an army base be the last place where a terrorist should be able to shoot at people uninterrupted for 10 minutes? After all, an army base is filled with soldiers who carry guns, right? Unfortunately, that is not the case. Beginning in March 1993, under the Clinton administration, the army forbids military personnel from carrying their own personal firearms and mandates that “a credible and specific threat against [Department of the Army] personnel [exist] in that region” before military personnel “may be authorized to carry firearms for personal protection.” [In the cases of Hassan and Alexis, it was too late for that.] Indeed, most military bases have relatively few military police as they are in heavy demand to serve in Iraq and Afghanistan. [in 2009]

The unarmed soldiers could do little more than cower as Major Nidal Malik Hasan stood on a desk and shot down into the cubicles in which his victims were trapped. Some behaved heroically, such as private first class Marquest Smith who repeatedly risked his life removing five soldiers and a civilian from the carnage. But, being unarmed, these soldiers were unable to stop Hasan’s attack.

The wife of one of the soldiers shot at Ft. Hood understood this all too well. Mandy Foster’s husband had been shot but was fortunate enough not to be seriously injured. In an interview on CNN on Monday night, Mrs. Foster was asked by anchor John Roberts how she felt about her husband “still scheduled for deployment in January” to Afghanistan. Ms. Foster responded: “At least he’s safe there and he can fire back, right?” — It is hard to believe that we don’t trust soldiers with guns on an army base when we trust these very same men in Iraq and Afghanistan. Unfortunately, most of CNN’s listeners probably didn’t understand the rules that Ms. Foster was referring to.

[…]

Read the rest there.

There are the exceptions of those who want to commit “suicide by cop”, but the deranged and cowardly go to places where they know potential victims won’t be armed.

Arguments can be advanced on both sides of this decision, but people should know about the policy and who implemented it.

UPDATE: 

There’s more.  In a comment, below, there is information about the policy being rooted in something Pres. George H.W. Bush did.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Liberals, Semper Paratus, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
30 Comments

Scalia on wymymprysts. Make popcorn!

There was another fake women’s ordination the other day.  Elizabeth Scalia has excellent comments.

Context: A granny from  Long Island went through a fake ordination.  She babbled to someone in the the press, who lapped it up with gusto.

This is amazing writing, by the way.  Enjoy this sample!

Her disingenuousness also seeps through the page, like the second person of a fabulist trinity, beginning with the notion that she can willfully separate herself from the church due to a principled disagreement, but should still be able to proclaim from its ambo. And then, per NewsdayShe called herself “a faithful daughter of the Church…” without caring (or perhaps without realizing) that one cannot claim to be faithful in a relationship while stepping out from it, or breaking trust with it. This woman has done both. She can no longer say she is “faithful.” Nor can she claim “obedience”, which is one of the anchors of the Catholic priesthood — so heavy it helps to keep the entire church well-grounded.

Finally, this woman is offensive in her thoughtlessness. To drag her priest and his canonical duties into her passion-play was gratuitous and unnecessary; it’s of-a-piece with her self-involvement, though. She was thoughtless to the pastor and priest who served her — I am sure very faithfully — the whole time she was collecting the theology degree that seems, to some women, to be all one needs to be ordained a priest (as though the credential proves the calling).

Fr. Z kudos to Elizabeth.  Great writing.  Read the rest over there.

You know my take on the faux wymyn rites, and they concern ecumenism.  Every time some protestant sect hosts one of these goat rodeos, there should be a swift and stern response from bishops concerning that sect’s disrespect for our sacred rites and all ecumenical dialogue with them should be suspended.

 

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Liberals | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments

Pope Francis: “the Lord has a special love for widows” (Fr. Z calls for an Order of Widows!)

While I think that we should be getting either all of Pope Francis’ little fervorini from his daily Mass or none of them (rather than snippets), today’s seems worthy of more note.  Some samples from the site of Vatican Radio.

(Vatican Radio) […] ListenRealAudioMP3 

Jesus has, “the capacity to suffer with us, to be close to our sufferings and make them His own,” said Pope Francis, who began his reflections with the encounter between Jesus and the widow of Naim, of which Tuesday’s Gospel reading tells. He pointed out that Jesus, “had great compassion” for this widow who had now lost her son. Jesus, he went on to say, “knew what it meant to be a widow at that time,” and noted that the Lord has a special love for widows, He cares for them.” Reading this passage of the Gospel, he then said, that the widow is, “an icon of the Church , because the Church is in a sense widow”:

“The Bridegroom is gone and she walks in history, hoping to find him, to meet with Him – and she will be His true bride. In the meantime she – the Church – is alone! The Lord is nowhere to be seen. She has a certain dimension of widowhood … and that makes me makes me think of the widowhood of the Church. This courageous Church, which defends her children, like the widow who went to the corrupt judge to [press her rights] and eventually won. Our Mother Church is courageous! She has the courage of a woman who knows that her children are her own, and must defend them and bring them to the meeting with her Spouse.” [There is a Patristic flavor to this.]

The Pope reflected on some figures of widows in the Bible, in particular the courageous Maccabean widow with seven sons who are martyred for not renouncing God. [Remember the allegorical exegesis of that passage by Ambrose.] The Bible, he stressed, says this woman who spoke to her sons “in the local dialect, in their first language,” and, he noted, our Mother Church speaks to us in dialect, in “that language of true orthodoxy, which we all understand, the language of catechism,” that, “gives us the strength to go forward in the fight against evil”: [“language of true orthodoxy… catechism”… interesting.]

“This dimension of widowhood of the Church, who is journeying through history, hoping to meet, to find her Husband… Our Mother the Church is thus! She is a Church that, when she is faithful, knows how to cry. When the Church does not cry, something is not right. She weeps for her children, and prays!  [And now reflect on how most Novus Ordo funerals are now, with their “celebration of life” foolery and white vestments and words of canonization of everyone who dies.] A Church that goes forward and does rear her children, gives them strength and accompanies them until the final farewell [i.e., DEATH] in order to leave them in the hands of her Spouse, who at the end will come to encounter her. [Who will come as “Just Judge” and “King of Fearful Majesty”.]This is our Mother Church! I see her in this weeping widow. And what does the Lord say to the Church? “Do not cry. I am with you, I’ll take you, I’ll wait for you there, in the wedding, the last nuptials, those of the Lamb. Stop [your tears]: this son of yours was dead, now he lives.”  [Watch some people pounce!  Ha!]

And this , he continued, “is the dialogue of the Lord with the Church.” She, “defends the children, but when she sees that the children are dead, she crys, and the Lord says to her: ‘I am with you and your son is with me.’” As he told the boy at Naim to get up from his deathbed, the Pope added, many times Jesus also tells us to get up, “when we are dead because of sin and we are going to ask for forgiveness.” And then what does Jesus “when He forgives us, when He gives us back our life?” He Returns us to our mother: [GO TO CONFESSION!]

“Our reconciliation with the Lord end in the dialogue ‘You, me and the priest who gives me pardon’; it ends when He restores us to our mother. There ends reconciliation, because there is no path of life, there is no forgiveness, there is no reconciliation outside of Mother Church. [NB you who think the Pope thinks the Church isn’t necessary: “there is no reconciliation outside of Mother Church”.] So, seeing this poor widow, all these things come to me somewhat randomly – But I see in this widow the icon of the widowhood of the Church who is on a journey to find her Bridegroom. [Which happens at a) death or b) the end of the world.] I get the urge to ask the Lord for the grace to be always confident of this “mommy” who defends us, teaches us, helps us grow and [teaches] us to speak the dialect.”

A few things.

First, the sermon seems to have had a nearly Patristic ring, stemming from his use of types and symbols.

Second, the widows the Lord encounters, such as the widow at Naim whose only son died were, in the ancient world, among the most vulnerable of all the “little ones”, in Hebrew anawim, the unprotected.  A woman without sons and husband was vulnernable and alone.  So too, today, is Holy Church becoming a widow in many ways, especially where she is being pushed to the margins and out of the public square.

Third, in the ancient Church there were “orders” of classes of people consecrated for work in the Church, especially having to do with corporal works of mercy.  For example, there was an order of consecrated virgins.  This order has been revived since the Council.  There was an order of gravediggers.  There was an order of widows.  They had to be 60 years old, of good reputation, and engaged in works of mercy.  The Church looked after them, especially through the ministry of deacons.

Fourth, contrast what the Holy Father says about these widows with his warning to modern women religious not to become “zitelle… spinsters”, which in Italian hints at sourness.

There has been some discussion of a revival of the Order of Widows.

I warmly and wholeheartedly support a revival of the Order of Widows.

May Pope Francis give close consideration to the work that has already been prepared concerning a modern incarnation of the Order of Widows.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS | Tagged , , ,
23 Comments

Sudden, Unprovided Death and You

Pray for the victims of the killer at the Navy Yard.

Friends, this could be you.

Please! Develop the good practice of examining your conscience every day and going to confession regularly.

I implore you! Teach your children to examine their consciences and take them to confession, teaching them what to do and why.

Fathers, these people could be your parishioners.  You will be called to account for the souls entrusted to you.  Preach about sin, about the Four Last Things, about the Sacrament of Penance.

“A subitanea et improvisa morte… From a sudden and unprovided death, spare us O Lord.”

A sudden death can be a blessing.

A sudden and unprovided death – unprovided in the sense of having no recourse to the sacraments when you are not in the state of grace – is a horrifying prospect.

Make plans for, provide for, the needs of both body and soul for yourselves and those in your charge.

You don’t know when your death will come, natural or not.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, GO TO CONFESSION, Semper Paratus | Tagged , , ,
28 Comments