Is there an agenda at work behind Pope Francis’ back?

Monday Vatican is out.

First paragraph…

Pope Francis: An Agenda Behind his Back?

Is there an agenda at work behind Pope Francis’ back? As he carries out his plan of renewal for the Church, one that is based on the purification of hearts, on pastoral efforts and on evangelization through attraction, many individuals are trying to exploit his spontaneity, and also his naivete, in order to advance their personal, political agenda for the Church. How much the Pope has understood the cross-interests at work behind his back is yet to be determined. Certainly, the way his words have so often been taken out of context and misinterpreted may have alerted him to some degree that this is going on.

[…]

Read the rest there!

Sample…

It’s as if the Church of 1968 has broken out again.

Posted in Francis, SESSIUNCULA, The Drill | Tagged ,
46 Comments

“O, swear not by the moon, the inconstant moon”

You know… ever since February started, I have had the strangest feeling that it was the wrong day.

Ever have that?

Get out your red pens.

Each day I turn another page of my copy of the Martyrologium Romanum, which is always out on a book stand. Today I received a note from a scholarly reader about a problem with the MartRom!

A google search for “Martyrologium Romanum” brings up several of your posts, and it seems as if you might use the newest edition (2004) regularly. I’d just like to alert you to a misprinting of the lunar calendar tables for February that I just noticed. I apologize if the following isn’t entirely clear, as it is tougher to explain than to see.

If you happen to read the day of the month you’d likely notice it
Monday anyways. For the 23rd, under “k” is 4, and for the 24th, “k” is 6, which means of course that something is wrong. It seems that the error traces back to the table for February 5th. [the culprit!] For this year the (ecclesiastical) new moon (“k”=1) is given as the 20th, while the correct date is the 19th.

So, for 5 februarii – 23 februarii, the table of the moon is a day off, for letter “E” on the 5th, and an additional letter (to the left) each day through the 23rd. On 24 februarii, the error is corrected and each incorrect letter is adjusted forward 2 days. O(null)n these days, wherever the number “30” is inscribed, read “1”, and adjust the following numbers though “E” accordingly. I just have the effected years bracketed in pencil to remind me to make the adjustment.

This error is unfortunately repeated exactly in the Italian
translation.

(One other obvious error I’ve found in the moon tables is that on 20 ianuarii, the table printed is totally incorrect, as it is a repeat of the 13 ianuarii table.)

I hope you find this useful and are able to pass it along if others ask about it. I was seriously perplexed until I tracked down how the February new moon was off this year! (Last year (“N”), the error didn’t have any effect, thankfully.)

It seems that the Moon is calculating, harsh mistress that she is.

BTW… it was the lunar New Year the other day for people in China and Vietnam and a few other places.

And, speaking of things lunar, don’t forget the great conjunction!  HERE

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , ,
5 Comments

OLDIE: Images of the Basilica of St. Peter on this Feast of the Cathedra

Here is an oldie but goodie from back in 2008:

Here are a few photos of St. Peter’s taken last year (2007) on this feast of the Cathedra of St. Peter.

It is pretty dark in the Basilica, so steady is the name of the game. Here is a shot through the columns over the main altar toward the apse, where you can see the candles arrayed.

A closer view.

The bronze Cathedra is decorated with lighted candles only once a year, today.

The black bronse statue of St. Peter attributed to the marvelous Arnulfo di Cambio was always dressed up in his cope and tiara, with a ring on his finger and pectoral Cross on two days, 29 June and today. Then the modernists in the Fabrica started fooling around. Too triumphalistic. They started cutting out elements. But all of them were back today except for the griccia alb, which I can live without I guess.

And ….

Posted in Classic Posts, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Two African Cardinals standing up!

In the lead up (already) to next October’s Synod, the continuation of last October’s wild ride with its bizarre rules, backroom maneuvers, and strange proposals, Africa (pace Card. Kasper) is coming into its own.

I saw this at the National Catholic Register:

Cardinal Napier: African Bishops Have Higher Priorities Than Communion for Divorced and Remarried

The South-African cardinal discounted a recent report in Crux that suggested African support for allowing such couples to receive the Eucharist.

ROME — A leading African cardinal says the continent’s bishops want the upcoming Vatican synod to zero in on strengthening the Church with good families — before getting sidetracked on other issues, such as the contentious debate over allowing Communion for divorced-and-remarried couples.
Cardinal Wilfrid Napier of Durban was in Rome last week for a meeting of African bishops — known as the Symposium of Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar, or SECAM — with Pope Francis.
In a Feb. 13 interview, he told CNA that he’d gotten together with a group of cardinals the previous evening to discuss what issues they should bring to the table come October, when the synod on the family meets in Rome.
“And the first thing we said was: We have to emphasize that we have good marriages; we have good families. Let’s be positive, first and foremost,” he said.
“Secondly, how can we ensure that the next generation is also going to have good families and good marriages? So the preparation and the accompaniment are two things that we really have concentrated on.”
Cardinal Napier’s comments emphasizing good families — and the preparation of good families in the future — were his answer to a question about a fellow African bishop’s supposed openness to admitting the divorced and remarried to Communion.
Crux’s John Allen wrote Feb. 11 that Ghanaian Archbishop Gabriel Palmer-Buckle of Accra said “he’s open to allowing divorced-and-civilly-remarried Catholics to receive Communion, [NB] belying impressions of a uniformly hostile African stance toward change on such matters.”
Allen did not quote Archbishop Palmer-Buckle, but wrote that the prelate says he is disposed to “vote Yes” on the “Kasper proposal.”
The term hearkens back to retired German Cardinal Walter Kasper, who has suggested that Communion might be given in certain cases to those who have divorced and subsequently remarried without having obtained a decree of nullity of their first marriage. [The unworkable, indefensible “tolerated but not accepted” non-solution.]
After discussing the need for strengthening families now and in the future, Cardinal Napier turned directly to the issue of the Ghanaian archbishop’s comments:
One of the cardinals had the presence of mind to call the man concerned [Archbishop Palmer-Buckle], and he said, ‘Look, I was talking in a very general way, and, yes, it did come up, and my answer was [that] in cases like this you have to look at it on a case-by-case basis; you can’t make a general statement that you can give Communion to people who are [divorced and] remarried, and so on.’

[…]

Doesn’t sound to me as if that Archbishop thinks what John Allen reported.  Perhaps the interview was … hasty.

Read the rest over there at the Register.

Meanwhile, we are also hearing from Robert Card. Sarah, whom Pope Francis appointed as the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments.

A reader alerted me to the news that His Eminence has now a book interview in French with Nicholas Diat published by Fayard. A few excerpts are HERE.

About “Gender issues” he said:

About my home continent, I want forcefully to denounce a desire to impose false values using political and financial arguments. In some African countries, ministries dedicated to gender theory have been created in exchange for economic support! These policies are all the more hideous because the greater part of African populations are defenseless, thanks to fanatical Western ideologues.

And about the upcoming Synod itself, he said (my emphases):

The idea would be to place the Magisterium in jewel box [NB] by detaching the pastoral practice, which could develop as circumstances, fashions and passions, is a form of heresy, a dangerous schizophrenic pathology. So I solemnly affirm that the Church of Africa will strongly oppose any rebellion against the teaching of Jesus and the Magisterium.

As you know, the constant mantra of those who are promoting Communion for the divorced and remarried is that “We will never change the Church’s teaching.  We can change our practice.”

No. Really, we can’t.

The Left and catholic media is going to present their agenda more and more in the coming months as if it were a done deal.  They will create a huge expectation through the media.

Just remember what Card. Kasper said HERE:

Q: But are African participants listened to in this regard?

KASPER: No, the majority of them [who hold these views won’t speak about them].

Q: They’re not listened to?

KASPER: In Africa of course [their views are listened to], where it’s a taboo.

Q: What has changed for you, regarding the methodology of this synod?

KASPER: I think in the end there must be a general line in the Church, general criteria, but then the questions of Africa we cannot solve. There must be space also for the local bishops’ conferences to solve their problems but I’d say with Africa it’s impossible [for us to solve]. But they should not tell us too much what we have to do. [?!?]

Fr. Z kudos to Card. Napier and Card. Sarah.

Posted in CRUX WATCH, Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , , ,
17 Comments

BREITBART: Canadian Fr. Rosica threatens to sue Canadian blogger (Vox Cantoris)

There is a piece at Brietbart by Austin Ruse (who runs C-FAM) about how Canadian Fr. Thomas Rosica, who does a lot of work with the Holy See Press Office, has threatened to sue a Canadian blogger.  My emphases:

tom_rosicaVATICAN SPOKESMAN THREATENS TO SUE CATHOLIC BLOGGER

Father Thomas Rosica, a Vatican spokesman who works in the media, has sent a menacing legal letter to a little-known Canadian blogger, threatening a lawsuit for allegedly criticizing him unfairly.

Father Rosica serves as assistant in the Holy See Press Office in charge of speaking to the English language press. A Canadian himself, Rosica is also founder of the Canadian Catholic cable network called Salt & Light. Though Rosica publicly defends the right to freedom of speech and press, he is attempting to silence the blogger who has criticized him.

On February 17, Rosica’s lawyers sent a letter to David Domet, who blogs at a site called Vox Cantoris, demanding that Domet take down certain blog posts they say malign Rosica’s character. The letter says:

Each of the said statements, separately and collectively, expressly and by way of innuendo, are false and defamatory in that they suggest that Fr. Rosica is dishonest; they suggest that Fr. Rosica is untrustworthy; they suggest that Fr. Rosica is willing to act unethically to further his own agenda and to do so at the expense of others.

At issue are a number of posts criticizing Rosica for his role in the unusually contentious Extraordinary Synod on the Family at the Vatican last October, which drew global attention to the debate within the Catholic hierarchy over communion for the divorced and civilly remarried and the Church’s approach to homosexual unions. Some feared, and others hoped, that the Church was set to change traditional doctrine. The blog Vox Cantoris claimed that Father Rosica, who was one of the official spokesmen of the Synod, was central to efforts to change at least Church practice, if not Church teaching.

Rosica’s letter pointed to nine specific posts, among them:

Make no mistake friends, Tom Rosica and the rest of them are not going to go quietly in the night. They are going to work insidiously over the next year so that there (sic) heterodox view of Catholicism is enacted, not in doctrine, but in praxis. For Father Rosica, it is but a continuing journey.

In a stunning rebuke of President of the Internet Father Thomas Rosica’s pronouncement that the Holy Family was “irregular” in order to justify the homoheresy of the Synod on the Family; Pope Francis today at his audience contradicted the earlier reports by the Vatican English-language spokesman and Executive Director of Canada’s Pepper and Darkness Catholic Channel of No Hope and has pronounced the Holy Family was indeed, “regular.”

American audiences might find the posts inflammatory and perhaps uncharitable, but not legally actionable. In the United States, bloggers may say practically anything they want about a public figure. But this case is being brought in Canada, where Father Rosica is a priest, against a Canadian blogger.

[…]

Father Rosica is no stranger to intramural Catholic hostilities. He has criticized LifeSiteNews and other conservative Catholic outlets for what he considers their uncivil approach to public discourse. This came to a head when Cardinal O’Malley of Boston allowed, and even participated in, a public Mass of burial for Senator Edward Kennedy, who had been perhaps the most visible Catholic abortion supporter in the United States.

In their letter, Father Rosica’s lawyers say that Rosica “is incurring and has incurred damages as a result of the aforementioned false and defamatory statements. These damages include damages to his reputation, work and service to the church.” They charge that the blog posts have also caused Rosica’s television network to lose subscribers.

Rosica’s lawyers are demanding that the blogger “immediately and publicly retract all statements on the blog regarding Fr. Rosica and apologize to him on the blog.” If the demands are not met by February 22, “we will seek instructions to commence an action against you,” they state. They have given him five days to comply, but even if he does, the lawyers say they may still sue.

It is not clear at this point what the proprietor of Vox Cantoris will do. He identifies himself as a Catholic family man without the means to defend himself against such charges.

Comments are OFF.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
1 Comment

NEW Z-SWAG – Liquidum non frangit ieiunium

Some of you asked for mugs with the phrase Liquidum non frangit ieiunium.

Ecce.  I added one to the Fr. Z Stuff Store.  HERE

Some samples…

Can insulator…

liquidum_mug_05

Drinking glass.

liquidum_mug_04

Something whimsical… for medicinal purposes only, of course.

liquidum_mug_03

Two sizes of coffee mugs, with the text on different sides.

liquidum_mug_02

liquidum_mug_01

 

There are various thermoses and even a wine glass charm (with several other things that I would never buy… but hey!).

Enjoy!

Liquidum non frangit 01 copy

 

Posted in Lighter fare, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , , ,
5 Comments

Get a free music CD of spectacular music of Lent from St. John Cantius

MISERERE CantiusI had a great offer from the Canons at St. John Cantius which they want to extend to you, through my blog.

BIRETTA BOOKS – SPECIAL OFFER FOR LENT

Biretta Books has a special Lenten offer for Fr. Z’s Blog readers.

Visit www.BirettaBooks.com anytime during Lent or the Easter Octave to take advantage of this special Lenten offer. Here is how it works.

Those who purchase at least $30.00 (US) worth of products from the Biretta Books online store qualify to get a free Miserere CD of Lenten Music sung by the St. Cecilia Choir of St. John Cantius Church, Chicago. The offer is available while supplies last and expires on 13 April 2015.

(1) Visit Biretta Books online at: http://birettabooks.com/

(2) Select at least $30 worth of items for your shopping cart

(3) Once you are at “Checkout,” go to the bottom of the page to the section marked “Additional Information”

(4) In the box for “Additional Information” type in this product code number to get your free Miserere CD: SY400

Hear audio samples of the Miserere CD online. Click here.

And… there’s a video!

 

Posted in ACTION ITEM!, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
6 Comments

CONJUNCTION ALERT!

I hope we have a break in the clouds!

From Sky and Telescope:

Earth’s two closest planetary neighbors draw strikingly close together this week.

When it comes to “eyeball astronomy,” nothing is more satisfying than to see a pair of celestial objects appear close together in the sky, what astronomers call a conjunction. And 2015, notes S&T‘s longtime contributing editor Fred Schaaf, truly deserves to be called the “Year of the Conjunctions.” In January we watched Venus and Mercury come together in the evening twilight, and this month features a similarly close and prolonged pairing of Venus and Mars. [“It’s still the same old story…”]

The two worlds have been edging closer together all month. Venus has become obvious in the southwest after sunset, and it’s been climbing a little higher week by week. Mars, meanwhile, has lingered in roughly the same part of the post-sunset sky for several months, refusing to depart. [Plus ça change…] Last week Mars was about 8° above Venus, but for a 9-day run beginning February 17th, the two remain within 2° of each other. That separation shrinks to less than 1° from the 20th through the 23rd.

Venus, Mars, and the Moon this week

The climax comes on February 21st, when the two planets are just 0.4° apart at dusk, as seen from the Americas. Since the pairing is so close, Schaaf cautions, “little Mars might be hard to see in Venus’s glare without optical aid.” [“… a case of do or die…”]

Both worlds will fit together in a medium-power telescopic view, with Venus clearly dominant — nearly 100 times brighter. Its dazzling yellow-white disk, shining at magnitude –3.9, is 12 arcseconds wide and 88% illuminated, whereas peach-colored Mars is much dimmer, magnitude +1.2 or +1.3, and just 4 arcseconds across.

As an added bonus, a thin crescent Moon is passing through this celestial scene. It clusters dramatically with the two planets in the deepening dusk on February 20th one day before Venus and Mars are closest. Get those cameras ready!

[…]

Very cool.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged
17 Comments

“Do not exaggerate, overestimate, what a Pope can do….”

Vatican IThe inimitable Fr. Hunwicke has a good reminder at his fine blog HERE about papal authority (my emphases):

Two points. Despite the anxieties entertained by the Intellectuals on both sides of this question … the Traditionalists and the Tablettentendenz … I see no grounds for panic. I see no practical likelihood whatsoever that anything will happen to put into doubt our duty, in our day-by-day Christian life, to adhere obediently to the judgements of the Roman Pontiff. But … let’s be honest … there have been in history occasions when Roman Pontiffs have wobbled in their adherence to orthodoxy …. Liberius and all that. In these circumstances, there does have to be a duty to resist that wobble and to decline to give effect to edicts purporting to enact the wobble. But here is the Red Line: at Vatican I, a great deal of historical work was done to ensure that the Decree on the Infallibility of the Roman Pontiff was so worded as not to be vulnerable on such historical grounds. It is watertight. We can be sure that whatever a pope says ex cathedra is protected by the Holy Spirit from any error (but even here, we are not obliged to believe either that the decree concerned was necessary, or that it expressed things in the best of all possible ways). But it is not unknown for a papal decree which falls short of the ex cathedra status to be flawed. Of course, that cannot be a good position for the Church to be in. But it is not some sort of Ultimate Catastrophe! The Church survived Liberius! And so did the Papacy! And, to the end of time, both will survive!

It is very important to remember the limits of the Papal Magisterium. This is best done by a careful reading of the decree Pastor aeternus of Vatican I. That is the touchstone. Do not exaggerate, overestimate, what a pope can do, and then, when some pope or other goes a bit off the rails, or you think he has, start running around in a frantic fear that you have “lost your faith”. The pope is not an Absolute Monarch. B Pius IX made this very explicitly clear. Benedict XVI taught this with determined vigour. This is serious! The Pope is not some God-on-Earth who can never make a mistake! Not a few of them have made quite a lot. There is no reason why the same should not be true in the future. Learn not to fret! Learn to live with it, as so many Catholics in previous generations have done! And if you’re the sort of person who can laugh at it, laugh. In any case, sit yourself down comfortably, pour yourself a drink … and learn the following off by heart:

“The Holy Spirit was not promised to Peter’s successors so that they should, by His revelation, disclose new teaching, but so that, with His assistance, they should devoutly guard and faithfully set forth the revelation handed down through the apostles, the Deposit of Faith.”

Popes make mistakes.  Popes are not infrequently wrong on a range of issues.  There is nothing new in this.

The moderation queue is ON.  I may hold a lot of the comments in queue for a while, just to see what is going on.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , , , ,
27 Comments

ASK FATHER: Friday fish and chips cooked in beef fat? POLL: “meatless Fridays”

POLL BELOW!

This is a repost of a by now classic here from a few years ago.  It is still useful (and fun).

From a reader:

I was watching TV last night & on the program they were talking about fish & chips fried in rendered beef fat at a restaurant.

Fish & Chips is one of my favorite Friday dishes and I assume that it’s cooked in vegetable oil of some kind. But, if I am at a restaurant, how could I know if they don’t state something on the menu (pretty common in California where I live). If it doesn’t say anything and I order and eat the fish & chips cooked in beef fat on a Friday in Lent have I broken the abstinence rules? Or is the fat merely the method of cooking, sort of like boiling pasta in water.

CLICK TO BUY

Remember that if you cook pasta in water, the pasta absorbs the water.  If the fish and chips are cooked in beef fat, you are also consuming some beef fat.

This is a great question for an Unreconstructed Ossified Manualist.

Prümmer says,

“The law of abstinence forbids eating meat and broth from meat, but not eggs, milk products, and also whatsoever condiments from the fat of animals.”

Sabetti-Barrett says:

“QUAER. 2. Quid dicendum de usu laridi?

Resp. Certum est non licere illud edere per frustra…

What is to be said about the use of lard?

Resp. It is clear that it is not permitted to eat it groundlessly and for an accompaniment with bread, because it is considered meat. It is permitted to use it even in evening snacks (refectiuncula), either as a condiment or in order to cook foods, provided that beforehand it will have been liquified. …

But wait! There’s more!

[Time for a COFFEE BREAK!]

Mystic Monk CoffeePaul VI’s Poenitemini says:

“The law of abstinence forbids the use of meat, but not of eggs, the products of milk or condiments made of animal fat. The law of fasting allows only one full meal a day, but does not prohibit taking some food in the morning and evening, observing–as far as quantity and quality are concerned–approved local custom.”

The language of “condiments” has remained.

Therefore, you can cook your fish in beef fat.  Use of fat from beef would not violate your abstinence from meat.

Thank you for being concerned about this.

I posted a POLL about what you think about the proposition that the US bishops should reestablish meatless Fridays as our form of penance for all Fridays of the year. The bishops of England and Wales did this.

You can vote even if you are not registered here. Please give your reasons in the combox below, respecting always the people who make arguments other than your own.

Should the US Bishops have us return to obligatory "meatless Fridays" during the whole year and not just during Lent?

View Results

Please use the Tweet and +1 and Facebook “like” buttons so we can get a high turn out.  Bloggers, I would appreciate it if you would also give us a lift.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Classic Posts, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
61 Comments