CQ CQ CQ – Ham Radio stuff

I had an interesting QSO in the sacristy of Ss. Trinita the other day. One of the priests of the FSSP is a ham.

That said, I haven’t done anything with Echolink yet. Sorry. I will have to be nagged into it, I think.

However, since I told myself I would post some ham things occasionally, here is something pretty cool. I have posted before about ham radio videos by USNERDOC available on Youtube. A while back he had some how-to videos about Anderson power poll set ups. I’d like to make some of the connectors, etc., for when I get a bit more ambitious (and actually have more gear). Anyway, he recently had videos showing how he made a convenient 100 foot wire antenna, that could be easily set up and taken down. Then, on a road tripe, he tuned into the AmRRON 20 meter HF Voice Net using a Tecsun PL-880 the above mentioned 100 foot antenna off of his hotel room in the pool area while in Scottsdale, AZ. I think that AmRRON broadcasts from Montana (not sure about that).

Anyway, here’s the video. Check out his other videos. He has made some great accessories/equipment.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

73

Posted in Ham Radio | Tagged , , ,
7 Comments

Wymyn At Wyrk. “Priestesses” doing their thing. Hijinx ensues.

Someone sent me this for an anti-birthday gift. I think he was trying to shorten my life. He failed, however. I believe laughter is supposed to lengthen life.

You simply have to grit your teeth and get into the part where they have written their own “eucharistic” prayer.

Goodness gracious, this is a hoot.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Honestly, these poor people are so confused. I am pretty sure most of them have no clear idea of how sacrilegious this is.

Posted in Lighter fare, You must be joking! | Tagged
79 Comments

Rome – Day 8: INTESTINES!

UPDATE:

Tomorrow, Wed 29 October, I’ll be saying Mass in the crypt at Santa Cecilia in Trastevere. Perhaps if there are a few people in Rome who would like to attend with our pilgrimage group, you’d be welcome. FWIW.

____

It’s the Feast of Sts. Simon and Jude, and, therefore, Happy Birthday to me! To celebrate, I said Mass… as one does. We were again at Ss. Trinità.  It is comforting to go into the church in the morning and see the altars in use.  Priests are welcome in the morning to say Mass here, which is a great service.  The sacristan is worth his weight in gold.

IMG_3159.JPG

IMG_3160.JPG

Even in the sacristy, an altar is in use.

IMG_3161.JPG

Something you don’t see in most sacristies, I dare say: pontifical dalmatic and gloves ready for use.  Situation normal around here.

IMG_3162.JPG

After Mass a priest friend an I walked over to the Campo de’ Fiori because I had an overwhelming urge for coppiette.  There’s a Norcineria on the side of the Campo that happens to be the oldest continuous shop in the whole zone.

Behold, porcine-meaty paradise!

IMG_3165.JPG

They make their own products.  Alas, it is really hard to get the horse coppiette now, so pig must suffice.  But they are really good!

Sorry about the blur.  I had hoped for better.  I’ll take my good camera next time.  The phone just doesn’t cut it.

IMG_3166.JPG

Here’s the happy sausage monger getting my coppiette ready.  I wanted a couple vacuum sealed packs for the trip home as well as a few to share as we walked out of the shop.

IMG_3164.JPG

Some ready sealed.  The laws for importation have changed for the USA.  You can bring in cured meats now.

IMG_3170.JPG

One of the things I had him seal up was some of this!  Oh my.

IMG_3168.JPG

On the counter he puts out a tray of slices of the some 30 different products they make.

At about 10 o’clock you see the salami of Barolo with the dark edge.  At 8, the tartuffo with the light edge.  At about 3, a brownish looking concoction that is liver and orange!  Fantastic.

IMG_3167.JPG

They are really smart to put samples out, and they are happy for you to try things.

Were I still living here, I’d be by often just to get their spiffy guanciale.

IMG_3169.JPG

Right across from the Norcineria (a deli-like butcher shop for products from Norcia), is the stand where I bought vegetables each day.  The nice old lady I used to buy from is still there.

IMG_3171.JPG

And now the puntarelle are back in season.  They are a material proof that God really does love us.  I like them with garlic and anchovy.

IMG_3172-0.JPG

I don’t know if I have mentioned it or not, but I collect “don’t dump garbage here” signs.  I used to use them as screen savers on the anniversary of the date the law went into force.  In this case 13 January 1703.  The Monsignor President of the Streets would fine you at least 10 scudi, the currency of the Papal States, for dumping illicit garbage here!

IMG_3163.JPG

And so I strolled off, without dropping my paper, after munching my pig intestine cured in peperoncino.

IMG_3173-1.JPG

UPDATE

A glimpse of S M della Pace.

IMG_3214-0.JPG

At Leoniana bookstore.  How I remember pouring through these two handy little books, which I now have squirrled away in a box somewhere.

IMG_3215-0.JPG

I dropped in a Gammarelli give them the trim for the pontifical set of vestments we are having made for use in the Diocese of Madison.  The gold silk was all cut and ready to go.  They lacked only the trim.

IMG_3218.JPG

Back out on errands, I had to take this photo of S Agnese with some brightly illuminated clouds, in a silvery light.

 

IMG_3217.JPG

Speaking of silvery light, the nice old lady at the passamaneria shop where I bought the galloni and pedoni gave me a little silver pom for a tabernacle key, and she asked for a prayer.  Perhaps you might advance her a few.  Her name is Anna, and she was very sweet.

 

IMG_3223.JPG

UPDATE:

The whole pilgrimage group tonight met at a restaurant that I favor.  We had to split off one table with four, alas, but I made the rounds.

Some snaps.

The classic, but with bombolotti rather than bucatini.

IMG_3239.JPG

This young lady had a little steak for supper.  Between her and her better half, the whole thing disappeared.

IMG_3240.JPG

It doesn’t get much better than this.  Masses in beautiful, ancient churches (Extraordinary Form!), Christian and pagan Rome, long meals in the evening, a stroll.

IMG_3237.JPG

If you were wondering what was on the left, that’s rigatoni alla norcina… black truffle.

IMG_3238.JPG

My little beef thing with a Barolo reduction.  I had to share it, I’m afraid.  Accompanied by cicoria.

IMG_3241.JPG

On the right, our director had a sauté of little clams. We get spaghetti with clams because we want the clams, right?  So why not get just the clams?  This is after shot.  He was too swift.

IMG_3242.JPG

And they brought out a little birthday candle for dessert.

IMG_3243.JPG

Now for some rack time.  A pretty good birthday.  I brought my end of the vestment project to a conclusion, had lunch with three distinguish authors (more on them in another post), did some gift shopping (it seems only right to get something for your mother on your birthday, after all), and then had this great meal.

Hard to beat.

And to think… we’ll have another pilgrimage like this next year to coincide with the Summorum Pontificum events.

Just think!

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , , ,
13 Comments

Pope Francis: “the family is being bastardized”

In Rome we have been seeing members of the Schoenstaat movement all over the place, as they gather for centenary celebrations.  Pope Francis addressed them and had some things to say about the state of the family today.

From EWTN/CNA:

In an audience with members of an international Marian movement, Pope Francis warned that the sacrament of marriage has been reduced to a mere association, and urged participants to be witnesses in a secular world.

“The family is being hit, the family is being struck and the family is being bastardized,” the Pope told those in attendance at the Oct. 25 audience.

He warned against the common view in society that “you can call everything family, right?[ZAP!]

“What is being proposed is not marriage, it’s an association. But it’s not marriage! It’s necessary to say these things very clearly and we have to say it!” Pope Francis stressed. [Okay!  Let’s say it!  And will the secular MSM pick it up?  Will they report that their darling Pope Francis, the first Pope who ever smiled, the first Pope who ever kissed a baby, the most wonderfullest fluffiest Pope ehvur, made it clear that attempts to confuse the concept of family and marriage must be resisted?  NEWS FLASH: Pope Francis seems not to think that homosexual unions, even with adopted children, are “marriages” and “families”.  Will the catholic media report on this? I just went over to the site of the Fishwrap and did a search on the keyword “Schoenstaat”.  Zip.]

He lamented that there are so many “new forms” of unions which are “totally destructive and limiting the greatness of the love of marriage.” [“‘new forms’ of unions”… hmmm… what ever could be mean?]

Noting that there are many who cohabitate, or are separated or divorced, he explained that the “key” to helping is a pastoral care of “close combat” that assists and patiently accompanies the couple.

Pope Francis offered his words in a question-and-answer format during his audience with members of the Schoenstatt movement, held in celebration of the 100th anniversary of its founding in Germany.

Roughly 7,500 members of the international Marian and apostolic organization, both lay and clerics from dozens of nations around the world, were present in the Vatican’s Paul VI Hall for the audience.

In his answers to questions regarding marriage, Pope Francis explained that contemporary society has “devalued” the sacrament by turning it into a social rite, removing the most essential element, which is union with God. [If it is a social rite, then I suppose three or four or more can all “marry”, including Spot, the family pet.]

“So many families are divided, so many marriages broken, (there is) such relativism in the concept of the Sacrament of Marriage,” he said, noting that from a sociological and Christian point of view “there is a crisis in the family because it’s beat up from all sides and left very wounded!”

[…]

“There is a crisis in the family because it’s beat up from all sides and left very wounded!”

“The family is being bastardized.”

I’ll say.

And as the family goes, so goes society.

Perhaps next year’s synod will look at this in a substantive way.

Posted in New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

ASK FATHER: Gloria and Creed for All Souls on Sunday?

From a reader…

The Canadian Bishops’ official Ordo clearly calls for the Gloria and the Creed on Sunday November 2. (Along with a note warning that the Sunday celebration shouldn’t be too penitential because it’s the Resurrection.)

But the Missal seems to say, pretty clearly, that the Gloria and Creed do not belong to the proper Mass for the day, and that Mass takes precedence of the Sunday (in the Ordinary form).

In this conflict, can the Bishops’ Ordo be right? Or can a Bishop determine such an “adjustment” to the liturgy for his own diocese?

I am a liturgical musician, so it matters practically. If you have time to comment, much thanks.

This is slightly schizo. But …!

The General Instruction says both the Gloria (GIRM 53) and the Creed (GIRM 68) may be sung or said “at particular celebrations of a more solemn character.”

Bishops can determine what constitutes “celebrations of a more solemn character”.  If they include All Souls (when it falls on a Sunday), then … hey!… who am I to judge?

Meanwhile, it’s jarring, to say the least.  The Sequence is tragically reduced to a mere option, but you can do a Gloria?  Really?  I will add that including a Gloria and Creed will make Mass longer, which will cut down on the time that Father Lovebeads for his homily.

On second thought, maybe it’s not a half-bad idea after all.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , ,
8 Comments

UPDATE: Did Card. Burke criticize Pope Francis? (Of course not, but the lexically challenged might not get that.)

Back on 17 October I posted a transcript of the now controversial interview Card. Burke did with BuzzFeed.  HERE  Those who read, can see what the transcript says.

But people don’t always read.

Dignitatis Humanae Institutute now weighs in about what Card. Burke really said and really didn’t say.  HERE  DHI gets into it because Card. Burke is on their board.

Take note.  I add my emphases:

 This is the now-notorious interview in which Cardinal Burke accused Pope Francis of having harmed the Church.  Only the Cardinal never said any such thing.

Here is what Cardinal Burke actually said:

“I can’t speak for the pope and I can’t say what his position is on this, but the lack of clarity about the matter has certainly done a lot of harm.” 

What BuzzFeed reported:

“According to my understanding of the church’s teaching and discipline, no, it wouldn’t be correct,” Burke said, saying the pope had “done a lot of harm” by not stating “openly what his position is.”

(Emphasis added in both cases).

Cardinal Burke was clear, in what he actually said, that in his opinion a general lack of clarity regarding the Pope’s position had caused harm to the Church.  BuzzFeed’s more sensationalist rearrangement of this text identifies the Pope himself as the cause of the harm.  The difference is of course important.

Benjamin Harnwell, the Founder of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, said: “The DHI has no issue with the professionalism of the journalist who filed the original story, and we were willing to give BuzzFeed the benefit of the doubt to an ambiguously reported paraphrasing.  However, once it was made clear that this controversial paraphrase did not reflect what Cardinal Burke actually said, we expected a speedy correction.  Sadly, BuzzFeed management declined our repeated requests.

So, DHI has tried to clarify what was obvious in the interview, for those who read it, namely, that Card. Burke did not attack or criticize the Pope.  Fishwrap and those types with BDS prattle away about Burke constantly criticizing Pope Francis.  Not so.

However, to make the issue clearer, through DHI, Card. clarifies:

Statement of Cardinal Burke:

Speaking through the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Cardinal Burke said:

“As a priest, bishop and finally a cardinal, I have only ever sought to serve Our Lord’s Church in humble obedience to the Magisterium and to the Holy Father. Needless confusion regarding my motives does not help me in this service, especially when substantial questions of principle are at stake.  I very strongly believe that one also serves loyally by expressing a contrary judgment, in accord with the pursuit of the truth, and that one only serves faithfully when one has dutifully and clearly spoken, in obedience to one’s conscience.”

I did not state that Pope Francis has harmed the Church.  Rather, as the now published verbatim interview reveals, I was perfectly clear that it was a lack of clarity about where the Holy Father stands on issues related to marriage and Holy Communion that had caused the harm.  It is precisely for this reason that I subsequently said that only a statement from the Holy Father himself could now remove this lack of clarity.”

“Sadly, confusion, such as that generated by this particular interview, has been used to portray those opposed to Cardinal Kasper’s thesis as motivated by a personal animus against the Holy Father.  This is just not the case, though it no doubt helps the cause of those with certain ideological axes to grind to make this appear so.”  ENDS

We might hope that this will settle the issue, but I doubt it.  Liberals are unlikely to be fair when it comes to Card. Burke.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Biased Media Coverage, Francis, Liberals, Linking Back, The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged , ,
7 Comments

Explaining Burke Derangement Syndrome

At Badger Catholic I saw something that helps to explain Burke Derangement Syndrome, or BDS.

You surely have seen dramatic, fainting couch worthy, episodes of BDS over at NSR (National Schismatic Reporter… to use just one possible “s” word, aka Fishwrap).

Certain of their writers simply hate Card. Burke.  They see His Eminence and they become silly, they vent, they swoon, they throw a spittle-flecked nutty.

Badger Catholic may have put the finger on the sore spot.

Cardinal Burke and the 1998 conversion of one of “Wisconsin’s most outspoken gay activists”

Recently we posted a story that has circulated on the internet about Cardinal Burke and the conversion of an active homosexualist.

Thanks to a gracious commenter, I found the true story of the gay activist’s conversion.

You can read the story “Coming Out of Sodom” by Eric Hess in Celebrate Life Magazine 2011-09-29 www.clmagazine.org/article/index/id/OTI2Mw/The story is from 2011 but the actual conversion happened in 1998 in the La Crosse Diocese.  There may be other stories like this one but this seems to match the details of the original.

I would recommend reading the whole thing, I’ll highlight a few details.

[…]

Read the rest there.

So, am I wrong?  Sure there are other reasons why catholics might dislike Card. Burke, but…. think about it.

Posted in Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , ,
13 Comments

Not just new sins, but new categories of sins!

Fr. Hunwicke – whom I thank for the recently conferred title Archiblogopoios*has done it again.  He is on the proverbial roll.

Here’s the whole thing… I can’t resist.  Be sure to go over there, spike his stats, and read the combox.  It’s worth your time.

My patented emphases and comments:

New Sins

In Mgr Ronald Knox’s brilliant collection of Essays in Satire, there is a piece about a ‘Professor’ who invents a new sin. Now, even Knox’s brilliance has been quite superseded. Now, you see, we have completely new types, genres, of Sin. The Third Millennium has branched out into a whole novel taxonomy of Sin.

Earlier this month [HERE] I approached this subject and asked three simple questions, as tests to apply to any newly fashionable theory about Sin. Here they are again:

(1) Can you square it with the Sermon on the Mount and the ethical teaching of S Paul?
(2) Can you square it with the Lord’s parables about not knowing ‘the Day or the Hour’?
(3) Does it apply to murderers and paedophiles?

Let me remind you what the New Casuistries teach about Sin.
(a) Graduality. “People cannot give up their Sin instantaneously. They should be given the time, and the grace of the sacraments, to wean themselves off it gradually.”
(b) Acceptance without Approval. “Remarried divorcees may be in a position to which the Church cannot give formal approval; but she may welcome them as they are into her Sacramental life.” [Kasper’s position – aka Tolerated But Not Accepted]
(c) Elements of truth. “Outside the relationship of heterosexual monogamy, other models of relationship exist in which important elements exist of the values proper to Marriage itself: and it is these elements which we should emphasise (permanence; self-sacrificing love …).”

Now apply Fr Hunwicke’s Question (3).  Would you accept that, since a paedophile has very strong inclinations, his aim should be to work hard to abuse children less and less frequently? How do you feel about the Church accepting that some paedophiles are gentle and affectionate to the children they abuse, and that we should concentrate our attention on those good elements of gentleness and affection? Take someone with a pathological impulse to murder: would you want the Church to continue to maintain the teaching of the Ten Commandments about Murder, but, without approving of the murders, to accept the unrepentant murderer as he is?

Probably you wouldn’t. Probably most people, even very liberal Catholics wouldn’t, unless they are themselves paedophiles or murderers or both. Why not? [It doesn’t pass the smell test.]

What we have is, in fact, the adoption by liberals of two quite distinct categories of Sin. There are sins which (most people would agree) are really sinful. Such as abusing and/or killing children. [Except when the utilitarianism kicks in and abortion is chosen.] The clever little games (a), (b), (c), would never be acceptable here. If somebody suggested that it really is in accordance with a nuanced Christian morality for a paedophile to abuse children as long as he does it gradually less frequently, most of us would probably kick him. However they contrive to control their behaviour, paedophiles should just give up, or genuinely try to give up, their vice. They should receive Absolution and then “Go and Sin No More”.

[Here, emphases is H’s] But there is now, for the Liberals, an additional, quite different category of Sin.It consists of things which, because they are condemned by Christ or by long centuries of Christian Tradition, liberals might agree are in some sense technically sinful. But liberals do not feel that they are really wrong. [Of course not!  They are morally superior beings!] So they devise sophisticated ways of avoiding the requirement of the Gospel: repentance and a firm purpose never to offend again and to avoid the occasions of Sin. Like children who have cheated and found out the answer to a sum, they start with the conclusion and then try to find the right ‘workings’ to get to the answer. “I want to argue that a homosexual couple may continue to live in a genitally sexual relationship: where can I find clever arguments to support that conclusion?”

SO WE NOW HAVE

(I) REALLY WRONG SINS; they really turn me upside down in my tummy.

(II) SINS WHICH ARE ONLY TECHNICALLY WRONG; my tummy feels completely OK about them. We’ve just got to find a way for the Church to shift her line without completely losing face.

Those are the two radically distinct categories of Sin in which Liberals now believe.

Neither in the Bible nor in two Christian millennia is there evidence for (II).

_________________________________________________________________________________

Bibliography: the important discussion here in the Church’s Magisterium is paragraphs 79-83 of the Encyclical of S John Paul II Veritatis splendor, together with its footnoted sources. The Holy Pontiff quotes (para 81) a passage of S Augustine in which that Doctor discusses the ‘absurdity’ of any notion that sins done for good motives (causis bonis) might be thought of as ‘sins that are justified’ (iusta peccata: I think this would have to be S Augustine’s Latin term for what my account above calls (II) SINS WHICH ARE (in the view of Liberals) ONLY TECHNICALLY WRONG).

The Holy Pontiff cleverly takes (para 80) the list of sins in para 27 of Gaudium et Spes and says that they are good examples of acts intrinsice mala, that is, always wrong, independent of circumstances. What is neat about this is that it includes sins which Liberals would consider (I) REALLY WRONG SINS (such as genocide, trafficking in women, slavery) [having to big a carbon footprint] and mixes them up with (II) SINS WHICH ARE (in the view of Liberals) ONLY TECHNICALLY WRONG (such as abortion). He then goes on to the intrinsically evil contraceptive acts and, in para 81, includes S Paul’s condemnation (I Cor 6:9-10) of categories including the sodomised and the sodomites (malakoi, arsenokoitai; molles, masculorum concubitores).

Fr. Z kudos.

*If that was just flattery to get me to link to him more often, it worked.  I can be bribed.

 

Posted in Liberals, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

Just Too Cool: Vatican Library manuscripts digitized, online

From Business Insider with lots of extremely cool images:

The Vatican Library was founded in 1451 by Nicholas V. It holds some 180,000 manuscripts, 1.6 million books and 150,000 images and engravings.

Last year, non-profit organization Digita Vaticana Oculus was founded with the aim of helping fund the digitization of 80,000 of the manuscripts, or 41 million pages.

In March, Japanese IT firm NTT DATA Corp won a four-year, $23 million contract to digitize the first 3000 manuscripts, totaling 1.5 million pages.

The first 500 manuscripts are now available to view, along with 600 incunabula – books or pamphlets printed before 1500 AD.

[…]

Here is a sample:

Oath, signed by 42 Christians of Kuchinotzu (Japan), to defend their missionaries to death, dated 1613.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity |
2 Comments

Italian bishop forbids people to receive sacraments from SSPX

At L’Espresso I saw this, in Italian:

Pope Francis forbids Lefevbrite priests from saying Mass
The follows of the ultra traditionalist French bishop, already excommunicated, are now in Bergoglio’s crosshairs. Through one of his most faithful men he has forbidden them to celebrate Mass and administrate the sacraments. Whoever follows them risks excommunication.

In essence the article says that “new beatings with a stick” have come from “pastor of mercy and forgiveness”.

The Bishop of Albano, Marcello Semeraro, has forbidden the SSPX priests – who have their Italian HQ in Albano, a stone’s throw from Castel Gandolfo and two stone throws from Rome – from administering the sacraments. He also forbade the faithful from receiving the sacraments from the SSPX priests saying that they run the risk of excommunication. This was issued in the form of a notification signed by Bp. Semeraro, who happens to be the secretary of the Gang of Nine assembled by Pope Francis… Cards. Marx, O’Malley, Rodriguez Maradiaga, etc.

The notification was apparently published in no less than the official daily of the Italian Bishops Conference, Avvenire. It seems that he had received numerous requests about the celebration of sacraments by the SSPX. He wrote that “it isn’t an institution… of the Catholic Church”.

The article mentions that the SSPX has 15000 followers in Italy. Given the state of the Church in some places, that’s not nothing.

I didn’t find the Notification in the online version of Avvenire, but that’s no surprise.  It would be interesting to see the actual wording. Did Bp. Semararo raise the specter of excommunication for Catholics in the Diocese of Albano who seek sacraments from the SSPX?

Just lately the Prefect of the CDF, Card. Muller, had a meeting with SSPX leadership which seemed to betoken something positive. This is more than a little chilling, don’t you think?

It also seems as if there is a lack of coordination or of vision on this topic, indeed, a lack of guidance.

UPDATE:

An alert priest reader sent a link to a PDF at the site of the CEI.  HERE

Posted in SSPX, The Drill | Tagged , ,
53 Comments