The Feeder Feed

TwitterI haven’t been able to post about the feeder for a while now.

Here are a few shots from today.

There are quite a few Robins around.  They hang out around the trees with drying fruit, bushes with berries.

Robin

Decisions.

Red-Breasted Woodpecker

Whatever their faults may be, these birds do catch your eye.

Blue Jays

Perhaps this is a Junco version of Bad?

Junco

Chickadee Exultant.

Yes, the Woodpecker left plenty for you.

Chickadee

Just nice.



During the winter, as during the other seasons of the year, they will eat only from your donations.

Posted in The Feeder Feed |
11 Comments

The Bolletino slips on a Banana

His Hermeneuticalness posted about an amusing little something picked up by the gentlemanly Sandro Magister.

Apparently during the Synod on the Middle East, a Chaldean bishop from Iran cited a work by the late Annibale Bugnini, who name shall live in infamy among those who love the Church’s traditional worship.  But in reporting the bishop’s intervention, the Bolletino got Bugnini’s name wrong:

Banana

With tongue in cheek Magister and Fr. Finigan opine about this being a kind of damnatio memoriae.

BTW… an amusing story about Archbp. Bugnini told me some years back.

When the Ayatollah Khomeini took control in Iran, he summoned the diplomatic corps into his presence and made them kneel down to him.  Bugnini, then the papal nuncio to Iran, did it.  He knelt.

When news of this reached Rome, some wag in the Curia quipped that Bugnini was doing in Iran all the genuflections he had removed from the Mass.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
13 Comments

Pueri Cantores in Ireland, and repercussion in Gregorian chant

I received a note from a friend about the Pueri Cantores convention in Ireland at Maynooth Seminary.

There are some fine video available for your perusal on Gloria.TV.

The chant is not perfect, but they will nevertheless convince you that we need more boys choirs!  There is nothing quite like the effect of a boys choir.  When the boys get back onto more familiar territory, such as the proper, the sound is exceptional.

One of the things I noticed right away was the striking use of repercussion in the Gregorian chant.  This is evident in the first video which begins with a less than optimal singing of the Introit, particularly when they get to the Gloria Patri.

Singers are divided about repercussion.  I tend to favor it but only when it is done with greeeeaaaat delicacy.   The notes mustn’t be hammered.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged ,
8 Comments

QUAERITUR: The canopy over the Holy Father’s chair

I was not able to see any of the canonization Mass on Sunday.   Today, however, I received a question from a reader about the canopy over the Holy Father at his chair.

Whilst watching some of the Ceremonies from the Vatican last Sunday
(Oct.17th) I noted the use of a Canopy over the Papal Throne. To my mind this is the first use of the canopy in several decades ? (Since the iconoclastic 1960’s) However, none of the Catholic Blogs I frequent have even mentioned it !

Consider it mentioned!

The throne of a bishop should always have a canopy over it.

Anyone else want to chime in?  I am sure there are some knowledgeable readers out there with things to contribute.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
17 Comments

QUAERITUR: non-Catholics reciting the Rosary

From a reader:

Me and a group of my friends try to go weekly to a nearby nursing home to visit and pray with the people there. We usually go around the rooms asking if any of them want to join us for the Rosary. Some decline but some accept, seemingly regardless of their religion. My only question is, Is there any problem with praying the Rosary with non-Catholics who might not know exactly what they are doing? It just seems a little odd to ask people to do something that might go against their beliefs (asking for intercession from the dead), especially if they seem to only be doing it for the company or because they don’t really know what is going on. What do you think?

I can see no problem with that at all, provided that no one is being constrained to recite the Rosary.  If their beliefs make reciting the Rosary hard for the, then they won’t do it.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
19 Comments

Consistory news coming soon

Last week I wrote:

Could we hear the announcement of a consistory perhaps next Wednesday during the General Audience?

The answer is: YES.

I predict that tomorrow we will hear the announcement of the names of the new cardinals, made at the Wednesday General Audience and the consistory will be 20 November, the Feast of Christ the King.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole |
14 Comments

Benedict XVI’s Letter to SEMINARIANS!

His Holiness of Our Lord, the Vicar of Christ Pope Benedict XVI has issued a letter penned to seminarians.

Let us have a look, with my emphases and comments.  I add observations at the en as well.

LETTER OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI
TO SEMINARIANS

Dear Seminarians, [NB: this is not to bishops, or priests, or just any ol’ religious or lay person.  They, along with prospective semarians, form the important peanut gallery.]

When in December 1944 I was drafted for military service, the company commander asked each of us what we planned to do in the future. I answered that I wanted to become a Catholic priest. The lieutenant replied: “Then you ought to look for something else. In the new Germany priests are no longer needed”.  [Not so different from today.] I knew that this “new Germany” was already coming to an end, and that, after the enormous devastation which that madness had brought upon the country, priests would be needed more than ever[NB: I often describe Pope Benedict’s prime project for his pontificate as being much like the Marshall Plan, which helped to rebuild Europe after the devastation.] Today the situation is completely changed.  In different ways, though, many people nowadays also think that the Catholic priesthood is not a “job” for the future, but one that belongs more to the past. You, dear friends, have decided to enter the seminary and to prepare for priestly ministry in the Catholic Church in spite of such opinions and objections. You have done a good thing. Because people will always have need of God, even in an age marked by technical mastery of the world and globalization: they will always need the God who has revealed himself in Jesus Christ, the God who gathers us together in the universal Church in order to learn with him and through him life’s true meaning and in order to uphold and apply the standards of true humanity[A supernatural objective and a natural objective informed by the supernatural.] Where people no longer perceive God, life grows empty; nothing is ever enough. People then seek escape in euphoria and violence; these are the very things that increasingly threaten young people. God is alive. He has created every one of us and he knows us all. He is so great that he has time for the little things in our lives: “Every hair of your head is numbered”. God is alive, and he needs people to serve him and bring him to others. It does makes sense to become a priest: the world needs priests, pastors, today, tomorrow and always, until the end of time.

The seminary is a community journeying towards priestly ministry. [That is what they should be.] I have said something very important here: one does not become a priest on one’s own. The “community of disciples” is essential, the fellowship of those who desire to serve the greater Church. In this letter I would like to point out – thinking back to my own time in the seminary – several elements which I consider important for these years of your journeying.

1. Anyone who wishes to become a priest must be first and foremost a “man of God”, to use the expression of Saint Paul (1 Tim 6:11). For us God is not some abstract hypothesis; he is not some stranger who left the scene after the “big bang”. [Furthermore, you cannot pray to an abstraction, you cannot have a relationship with an abstraction.] God has revealed himself in Jesus Christ. In the face of Jesus Christ we see the face of God. In his words we hear God himself speaking to us. It follows that the most important thing in our path towards priesthood and during the whole of our priestly lives is our personal relationship with God in Jesus Christ. The priest is not the leader of a sort of association whose membership he tries to maintain and expand.  [Get that?  Today, the number of committed Catholics may be shrinking.  Also, we have to do the right thing, even if that means taking a hit in financing or numbers.  Just think of John 6, on the one hand, and Judas interest in money on the other.] He is God’s messenger to his people. He wants to lead them to God and in this way to foster authentic communion between all men and women. That is why it is so important, dear friends, that you learn to live in constant intimacy with God. When the Lord tells us to “pray constantly”, he is obviously not asking us to recite endless prayers, but urging us never to lose our inner closeness to God. [A te numquam separari permittas.] Praying means growing in this intimacy. So it is important that our day should begin and end with prayer; that we listen to God as the Scriptures are read; that we share with him our desires and our hopes, our joys and our troubles, our failures and our thanks for all his blessings, and thus keep him ever before us as the point of reference for our lives. In this way we grow aware of our failings and learn to improve, but we also come to appreciate all the beauty and goodness which we daily take for granted and so we grow in gratitude. With gratitude comes joy for the fact that God is close to us and that we can serve him.

2. For us God is not simply Word. In the sacraments he gives himself to us in person, through physical realities. At the heart of our relationship with God and our way of life is the Eucharist. Celebrating it devoutly, and thus encountering Christ personally, should be the centre of all our days. In Saint Cyprian’s interpretation of the Gospel prayer, “Give us this day our daily bread”, he says among other things that “our” bread – the bread which we receive as Christians in the Church – is the Eucharistic Lord himself.  [And may all seminary faculties be reminded that the Cong. for Catholic Education in 1990 issued a document requiring that Patristics have its own place in the program of formation in seminaries.] In this petition of the Our Father, then, we pray that he may daily give us “our” bread; and that it may always nourish our lives; that the Risen Christ, who gives himself to us in the Eucharist, may truly shape the whole of our lives by the radiance of his divine love. The proper celebration of the Eucharist involves knowing, understanding and loving the Church’s liturgy in its concrete form. [This includes the Extraordinary Form, btw.] In the liturgy we pray with the faithful of every age – the past, the present and the future are joined in one great chorus of prayer. As I can state from personal experience, it is inspiring to learn how it all developed, what a great experience of faith is reflected in the structure of the Mass, and how it has been shaped by the prayer of many generations.

3. The sacrament of Penance is also important. It teaches me to see myself as God sees me, and it forces me to be honest with myself. It leads me to humility. [The Pope must go to confession just like everyone else.  More so, probably.] The Curé of Ars once said: “You think it makes no sense to be absolved today, because you know that tomorrow you will commit the same sins over again. Yet,” he continues, “God instantly forgets tomorrow’s sins in order to give you his grace today.” Even when we have to struggle continually with the same failings, it is important to resist the coarsening of our souls and the indifference which would simply accept that this is the way we are. It is important to keep pressing forward, without scrupulosity, in the grateful awareness that God forgives us ever anew – yet also without the indifference that might lead us to abandon altogether the struggle for holiness and self-improvement. Moreover, by letting myself be forgiven, I learn to forgive others. In recognizing my own weakness, I grow more tolerant and understanding of the failings of my neighbour.

4. I urge you to retain an appreciation for popular piety, which is different in every culture [which liberals sneer at] yet always remains very similar, for the human heart is ultimately one and the same. Certainly, popular piety tends towards the irrational, and can at times be somewhat superficial. Yet it would be quite wrong to dismiss it. Through that piety, the faith has entered human hearts and become part of the common patrimony of sentiments and customs, shaping the life and emotions of the community. Popular piety is thus one of the Church’s great treasures. The faith has taken on flesh and blood. Certainly popular piety always needs to be purified and refocused, yet it is worthy of our love and it truly makes us into the “People of God”.

5. Above all, [Perhaps different from “first and foremost” back in No. 1.] your time in the seminary is also a time of study. The Christian faith has an essentially rational and intellectual dimension. [To a degree, the things the Pope mentioned so far are strongly affeective.] Were it to lack that dimension, it would not be itself. Paul speaks of a “standard of teaching” to which we were entrusted in Baptism (Rom 6:17). All of you know the words of Saint Peter which the medieval theologians saw as the justification for a rational and scientific theology: “Always be ready to make your defence to anyone who demands from you an ‘accounting’ (logos) for the hope that is in you” (1 Pet 3:15). Learning how to make such a defence is one of the primary responsibilities of your years in the seminary. [This sounds like a specific call from the Pope for an emphasis on apologetics.] I can only plead with you:  [The. Pope. Pleads. With. You.  … Think about that.] Be committed to your studies! Take advantage of your years of study! You will not regret it. Certainly, the subjects which you are studying can often seem far removed from the practice of the Christian life and the pastoral ministry. Yet it is completely mistaken to start questioning their practical value by asking: Will this be helpful to me in the future? Will it be practically or pastorally useful? The point is not simply to learn evidently useful things, but to understand and appreciate the internal structure of the faith as a whole, [The priest needs a world view, an interpretive lens, a hermeneutic…] so that it can become a response to people’s questions, which on the surface change from one generation to another yet ultimately remain the same. For this reason it is important to move beyond the changing questions of the moment in order to grasp the real questions, and so to understand how the answers are real answers. [Which leads me to suggest that the same goes for liturgical worship in seminary.  Seminarians should also have that worship which does not change.] It is important to have a thorough knowledge of sacred Scripture as a whole, in its unity as the Old and the New Testaments: the shaping of texts, their literary characteristics, the process by which they came to form the canon of sacred books, their dynamic inner unity, a unity which may not be immediately apparent but which in fact gives the individual texts their full meaning. [The Fathers can help seminarians learn this.  And speaking of the Fathers…] It is important to be familiar with the Fathers and the great Councils in which the Church appropriated, through faith-filled reflection, the essential statements of Scripture. I could easily go on. What we call dogmatic theology is the understanding of the individual contents of the faith in their unity, indeed, in their ultimate simplicity: each single element is, in the end, only an unfolding of our faith in the one God who has revealed himself to us and continues to do so. I do not need to point out the importance of knowing the essential issues of moral theology and Catholic social teaching[His Holiness probably doesn’t need to point that out to seminarians… not to seminarians…] The importance nowadays of ecumenical theology, and of a knowledge of the different Christian communities, is obvious; as is the need for a basic introduction to the great religions, to say nothing of philosophy: the understanding of that human process of questioning and searching to which faith seeks to respond. But you should also learn to understand and – dare I say it – to love canon law, appreciating how necessary it is and valuing its practical applications: a society without law would be a society without rights. Law is the condition of love. I will not go on with this list, but I simply say once more: love the study of theology and carry it out in the clear realization that theology is anchored in the living community of the Church, which, with her authority, is not the antithesis of theological science but its presupposition. Cut off from the believing Church, theology would cease to be itself and instead it would become a medley of different disciplines lacking inner unity.

6. Your years in the seminary should also be a time of growth towards human maturity. It is important for the priest, who is called to accompany others through the journey of life up to the threshold of death, to have the right balance of heart and mind, reason and feeling, body and soul, and to be humanly integrated. To the theological virtues the Christian tradition has always joined the cardinal virtues derived from human experience and philosophy, and, more generally, from the sound ethical tradition of humanity. Paul makes this point this very clearly to the Philippians: “Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honourable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things” (4:8). This also involves the integration of sexuality into the whole personality. Sexuality is a gift of the Creator yet it is also a task which relates to a person’s growth towards human maturity. [I think this is code language.  Cf. the Vatican’s document about not admitting men with homosexual tendencies into programs of formation if those tendencies are very strong or if they cannot deal with them in a healthy way.] When it is not integrated within the person, sexuality becomes banal and destructive. Today we can see many examples of this in our society. Recently we have seen with great dismay that some priests disfigured their ministry by sexually abusing children and young people. Instead of guiding people to greater human maturity and setting them an example, their abusive behaviour caused great damage for which we feel profound shame and regret. As a result of all this, many people, perhaps even some of you, might ask whether it is good to become a priest; whether the choice of celibacy makes any sense as a truly human way of life. Yet even the most reprehensible abuse cannot discredit the priestly mission, which remains great and pure. Thank God, all of us know exemplary priests, men shaped by their faith, who bear witness that one can attain to an authentic, pure and mature humanity in this state and specifically in the life of celibacy. Admittedly, what has happened should make us all the more watchful and attentive, precisely in order to examine ourselves earnestly, before God, as we make our way towards priesthood, so as to understand whether this is his will for me. It is the responsibility of your confessor and your superiors to accompany you and help you along this path of discernment. It is an essential part of your journey to practise the fundamental human virtues, [“human virtues”, those which we can discern from reason.  And then…] with your gaze fixed on the God who has revealed himself in Christ, and to let yourselves be purified by him ever anew.

7. The origins of a priestly vocation are nowadays more varied and disparate than in the past. [Later vocations, vocations coming from lay movements, etc.] Today the decision to become a priest often takes shape after one has already entered upon a secular profession. [You could hear it coming down the line…] Often it grows within the Communities, particularly within the Movements, [yep] which favour a communal encounter with Christ and his Church, spiritual experiences and joy in the service of the faith. It also matures in very personal encounters with the nobility and the wretchedness of human existence. As a result, candidates for the priesthood often live on very different spiritual continents. It can be difficult to recognize the common elements of one’s future mandate and its spiritual path. For this very reason, the seminary is important as a community which advances above and beyond differences of spirituality. The Movements are a magnificent thing. You know how much I esteem them and love them as a gift of the Holy Spirit to the Church. Yet they must be evaluated by their openness to what is truly Catholic, to the life of the whole Church of Christ, which for all her variety still remains one. The seminary is a time when you learn with one another and from one another. In community life, which can at times be difficult, you should learn generosity and tolerance, not only bearing with, but also enriching one another, so that each of you will be able to contribute his own gifts to the whole, even as all serve the same Church, the same Lord. This school of tolerance, indeed, of mutual acceptance and mutual understanding in the unity of Christ’s Body, is an important part of your years in the seminary[Would that it had been so in my day!]

Dear seminarians, with these few lines I have wanted to let you know how often I think of you, especially in these difficult times, and how close I am to you in prayer[Who can for an instant doubt that!] Please pray for me, that I may exercise my ministry well, as long as the Lord may wish. I entrust your journey of preparation for priesthood to the maternal protection of Mary Most Holy, whose home was a school of goodness and of grace. May Almighty God bless you all, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

From the Vatican, 18 October 2010, the Feast of Saint Luke the Evangelist.

Several things occur to me at this point.

First, the Pope is concerned that young men will be discouraged by what they are seeing.  This is a real shot in the arm.

Consider what a shot in the arm Summorum Pontificum was for priests.   Since and during the Council there has a tendency, heck… nearly an obsession… about building up the mystic and power of bishops.  This Pope has, I think, a little different view of the matter.

The Holy Father is not just speaking to the seminarians of the pampered West and Northern Hemisphere in the letter.   He is also not speaking around them.

Pope Benedict spoke from personal experience, from his youth… a very difficult time.  I think he sees similarities.

Posted in Brick by Brick, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
26 Comments

QUAERITUR: Traditional Mass but newer office

From a reader:

Father, I seem to be in a quandry about the liturgy. I attend a Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter Parish in Tulsa and I am an Oblate of Clear Creek monastery, which also uses the 1962 liturgies. My question is this: Is there anything really wrong with using the Liturgy of the Hours as my daily Office? I’ve heard all the standard arguments from my ‘super-traddy’ friends, but they don’t seem to wash. I have an FSSP priest-friend that uses the LOH and is quite pleased with it. What’s all the fuss.

First, it is good that you are interested in the Church’s other liturgical prayer, the office, either with the Breviarium Romanum or some smaller office, or the Liturgy of the Hours.

Since you are a layman without the obligation to recite any office, you are free to do as it pleases you to do.  Use this book or that.  Say it all, or a little, or none at all.

That said, it makes sense to use the older books together and the newer books together.  This way what you do at Mass and with the office has more coordination, especially between the calendars.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
30 Comments

WDTPRS: 21st Sunday after Pentecost – “the sort of Collect liberals hate”

I am amused and horrified whenever I hear liberals propose that we modern men and women are all grown up now and that we no longer have to kneel as if cowering before a stern master God.

With that in mind… let’s have a look at the Collect for the upcoming Sunday in the TLM – 1962 Missale Romanum.  This a portion from my article for The Wanderer.

This Collect has been in use at least since the time of the Liber Sacramentorum Gellonensis, which is a variation of the ancient Gregorian Sacramentary.  It survived the Novus Ordo cutter-snippers as the Collect for the 5th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

COLLECT (1962MR)
Familiam tuam, quaesumus, Domine,
continua pietate custodi:
ut a cunctis adversitatibus,
te protegente, sit libera;
et bonis actibus tuo nomini sit devota.

The first part was used almost like a template in other prayers, as in the Collect of the 5th Sunday after Epiphany: “Familiam tuam, quaesumus, Domine, continua pietate custodi, ut, quae in sola spe gratiae caelestis innititur, tua semper protectione muniatur.”   Note not only the similar beginning, but also a connection in the vocabulary with that form of protego.  This suggests to me that the prayers are related.

That word familia, though it seems so familiar, should have some attention.  Familia and forms of famulus occur often in our prayers.  Think of the line in the Roman Canon including “Memento, Domine, famulorum, famularumque tuarum… Be mindful, O Lord, of Your household servants and handmaids”.  These words look like “family”, as does familia, and that is often appropriate depending on the context.  However, the core meaning of the root of the word, fama, which comes from Latin’s ancient cousin Oscan must guide our minds to the whole body of people in an ancient household, including especially the servants.  The different words for “family” in Latin include all the servants and staff, with the extended family, not just the core.  The paterfamilias, “father of the family” had virtual power of life and death over most of his household and his word was law.

Custodio, common in military language, means “to watch, protect, keep, defend, guard”.

Pietas is complicated, as we have seen many times.  Obvious English “piety” comes from this, but the Latin is more involved.  Your Lewis & Short Dictionary, oddly cheap considering its usefulness, says pietas is “dutiful conduct toward the gods, one’s parents, relatives, benefactors, country, etc., sense of duty.” The classic application of pietas and the adjective pius is to the figure of Aeneas in the Latin poet Virgil’s Aeneid.  As Troy was being destroyed by the Greeks after the incident with the wooden horse, Virgil (+A.D. 19) has Aeneas carry his elderly father Anchises from the wreckage of the burning city while leading his little son along by hand.  This image of the man with his father on his back and his son by the hand perfectly expresses the duties Aeneas, future founder of what will become Rome, had toward his family, his pietas.  He was also scrupulous in relation to the gods.  So he is usually called pius Aeneas, which as you now know is far more complicated than the mere “pious Aeneas”.

Christians adapted ancient terms like this to a new context, to express new meanings. In Jerome’s Vulgate in both Old and New Testament pietas is “conscientiousness, scrupulousness regarding love and duty toward God.”  You see that the core of pietas remains “duty.”  Pietas is also one of the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit (cf. CCC 733-36; Isaiah 11:2), by which we are duly affectionate and grateful toward our parents, relatives and country, as well as to all men living insofar as they belong to God or are godly, and especially to the saints.  In loose or common parlance, “piety” indicates fulfilling the duties of religion.  Sometimes “pious” is even used in a negative way, as when people take aim at external displays of religious dutifulness as opposed to what they is “genuine” practice (cf. Luke 18:9-14).

All this is involved when we use pietas to describe ourselves, what human beings have regarding, God, family, country, etc.   But in our prayer today, we are asking God to guard us with His pietas.   When we speak of the pietas of God, we are generally referring to His mercy toward us.  While it is not strictly right to imply that God has a duty toward us, He has made promises and God is true to His promises.  We can depend on Him not because He is obliged by pietas, as we are, but because He is loving and merciful.  So, God’s pietas towards us has a different tone altogether.

I note as well that in that line from the Canon I quoted above in respect to familia, down the line a bit, we come to the Latin word devotio.  We have a form of that word in today’s Collect.  There must be a connection between the concepts of familia, pietas and devota, an adjective connected with familia.

Your L&S reveals that devoto “to dedicate, devote” as well as “to bewitch, enchant” and, in a related sense, “to invoke with vows”, and by logical extension it comes to mean “to curse”, though clearly today’s use doesn’t bear that connotation.  In the French source for liturgical Latin we call Blaise/Dumas, we find that the adjective devotus, a, um has a specially connection to devotion to service of the Lord.

We can also draw insight into what is really being said here by bringing in the force of devotio, an obvious derivative.  In classical usage devotio is “fealty, allegiance, devotedness; piety, devotion, zeal.” Devotio also means, as devoto implied, “a cursing, curse, imprecation, execration, a magical formula, incantation, spell.” That is not our direction today!

Briefly, I hear devotio as “a devotion to duty”.  In that sense it picks up the meaning of pietas. Our “devotion” leads us to keep God’s commandments and attend with focus to the duties of our state before all else.  If we are truly devout, pious, in respect to God, devoted to fulfilling the duties of our state in life truly is here and now, then God will give us every actual grace we need to fulfill our vocations. We are, in effect, fulfilling our proper role in His great plan and thus He is sure to help us.   God fulfills what He promises to us as we do our part in His plan in which He gave us a role from before the creation of the universe.

ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
Father,
watch over your family
and keep us safe in your care,
for all our hope is in you.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Guard your family, we beseech you, O Lord,
with continual mercy,
so that that (family) may be free from all adversities
as You are protecting it,
and in good acts may be devoted in Your Name.

This prayer speaks first of all to how interconnected we are as Catholic Christians.

By baptism, we are the adopted children of the Father.  We look to Him with the reverence of children, not merely as cowering slaves.  We belong to a family.  In the arc of our lives we have roles and states to fulfill.  Within the Church we have our manner of participation.

We are all in this together.  My strengths support yours.  My sins weaken us all.  My defeats become your concern. All our triumphs are shared as we raise them up to God.

In remembering our common bonds with each other in the Father, we must also remember a profound inequality in our bonds – children are no less members of the family than parents, but they are dependent they are not the equals of their parents.

God is not our peer.  We are not His equal.  We are all children before His gaze.

As I said at the top, I am amused and horrified when liberals suggest that modern man is so sophisticated now that we no longer have to kneel before God as if He were… I don’t… a Lord or something.  God is pretty lucky, after all, that we came.

Our prayer gives us an image that runs very much contrary to the prevailing values of the last few decades, a period in which the family as a coherent recognizable unit has been systematically broken down.

Our Latin prayers also often reflect the Church’s profound awareness of our lack of equality with God.

The prayers are radically hierarchical, just as God’s design reveals hierarchy and order.

The prayers are imbued with reverential love, awe.

Compare this attitude with prevailing societal norms.

Posted in WDTPRS |
7 Comments

Anglican Bishop announces intention to use Anglicanorum coetibus. Fr. Z rants.

I was remiss in not posting about this before, but the lovely and persistent Anna Arco of The Catholic Herald posted that the Anglican Bishop of London, … well.. here it is…

The Anglican bishop of Fulham and the chairman of Forward in Faith International has announced he will resign before the end of the year to join an Ordinariate.

Speaking at Forward in Faith’s National Assembly today, Bishop John Broadhurst, who is a senior figure in the Anglo-Catholic movement, said he intended to tender his resignation before the end of the year and join the Ordinariate in Britain when it is established. He has said that he will remain the chairman of Forward in Faith, which he says is not an Anglican organisation.

Bishop Broadhurst is a suffragan bishop of the Diocese of London. He said the Bishop of London would likely appoint someone new to fill the post Bishop Broadhurst is vacating.

He is the first senior Anglo-Catholic to announce publicly that he will join an Ordinariate when it is founded.

[…]

Pope Benedict is the Pope of Christian Unity.

In the meantime, many disgruntled Catholics are on pins and needles waiting for the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams to issue the long-expected Romanorum coetibus, which will give a safe-haven to liberals who want to keep their large puppets and pottery, 60’s music and the ordination of women, prayer to the earthmothergoddess… all without the spirit-repressing domination of masculine Rome!

“But Father! But Father!”, you might be saying with furrowed brow.  “Who, pray tell, should go over to them?  Do you have anyone in mind?”

Since I am in Detroit at the time of this writing, I suggest all the Call To Action types and those associated liberal confab Archbp. Vigneron warned against the other day… and all their speakers… should just go. The folks who are determined to poison reception of the new translation should think over carefully which Church they truly desire to belong to.   99% of the writers of the NCR.   There is hope for some of them, however.  Nearly all the members of the LCWR and CHA could join the wymynpryst types who should immediately get out.  Remember girls! There is a safe haven for all of you! It’s such a small step.   Since I am on it… the dissidents fighting against Archbp. Nienstedt in St. Paul and Minneapolis and against all the Minnesota bishops who are sticking up for true marriage, according to God’s will revealed in nature and in revelation.  Hasta la vista.

This is not an invitation for you to add your own names.  I am ranting.

See what a few hours in Detroit has done to me already?  I am all worked up!  Back to the situation in England…

Damian has this and this.  His Hermeneuticalness has this.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged
21 Comments