1st Friday!

Don’t forget: today is a 1st Friday.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

A survey suggests something about our Catholic identity

Since I have barely been online for some days, I just found out about an article by Laurie Goodstein of the NYT about a study done by the Abu Dhabi Gallup Center, a Muslim group, about how people of various religions identify with their religion, co-religionists, country and countrymen.

The report itself is worth some of your time.

Since I talk all the time about our Catholic identity and revitalizing our identity I found this pretty interesting.  Of course it focuses mainly on Muslims, but there are stats about Catholics as well.

The result I found most interesting had to do with how strongly Catholics identify with each of the following groups? A. The United States B. Your ethnic background C. Your religion D. Those worldwide who share your religious identity Muslim Americans.  The result: 39% of Catholics identity with other Catholics around the world.

First, I wonder what that number would be in, say, England, where Catholics experience a different social dynamic than American Catholics have.

And I continue to wonder.

If we had done what the Second Vatican Council asked for in a reform of the liturgy and if we had continued to use Latin and had placed Gregorian chant in the first place for music…  could that number in the U.S. have been higher than 39%?

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged
17 Comments

The horns of a health care dilemma

I’ll bet they had a good laugh about this one at the White House.

I saw this from the Catholic League.

OBAMA PLAYS CATCH-22 WITH RELIGIOUS GROUPS

Catholic League president Bill Donohue addresses the dilemma that the Obama administration has created for religious employers:

Yesterday, the Obama administration mandated that all health insurance plans cover contraceptives and sterilization for women, though it made an exception for religious employers. But did it? Not really. To wit: a religious employer is defined, in part, as one that primarily employs, and serves, persons who share its religious tenets.

Cardinal Daniel DiNardo said this means that “our institutions would be free to act in accord with Catholic teaching on life and procreation only if they were to stop hiring and serving non-Catholics.” He’s right: Catholic schools, hospitals and social service agencies have a long and distinguished record of serving everyone, regardless of religious affiliation; most even employ non-Catholics. However, there are matters, like foster care programs, where same-religion requisites make sense.

The situation is even more pernicious than it looks. Consider that three years ago, then presidential candidate Barack Obama said he opposes allowing faith-based programs to hire only their own people. Since becoming president, he has authorized his administration to consider this issue on a case-by-case basis, and just recently many of his allies lobbied him to gut the religious liberty provision in hiring altogether.

In other words, the Obama administration is playing Catch-22 with religious employers. If they are too religious, Catholic social service agencies risk losing federal funds, but if Catholic hospitals are not sufficiently religious, they cannot be exempt from carrying health insurance policies that transgress their religious tenets.

The Obama administration knows exactly what it is doing, and what it is doing is burning religious institutions at both ends. This is a pretty sick game. But it is one where there is plenty of time left on the clock.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, SESSIUNCULA, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice |
19 Comments

Escape from CASTLLLLE DAAANGERRR!

We concluded our wonderful gathering of priests this morning and all now scatter back upon the four winds.

And so I leave CASTLLLE DAAANGERRR once again.

But first a visit to the lighthouse!

20110804-115403.jpg

Posted in On the road |
8 Comments

The intent of the liturgical reform?

A reader sent this.

Would that this Pope were heeded — and would that he heeded his own advice!

Paul VI on Liturgical Reform

The proper implementation of the Constitution on the Liturgy [Sacrosanctum Concilium] requires of you that the “new” and the “old” be brought together in a bond that is both suitable and beautiful. What must be avoided at all costs in this matter is that eagerness for the “new” exceed due measure, resulting in insufficient regard for, or entirely disregarding, the patrimony of the liturgy handed on. Such a defective course of action should not be called renewal of the Sacred Liturgy, but an overturning of it. The liturgy, in fact, displays a similarity to a hardy tree, the beauty of which shows a continual renewal of leaves, but whose fruitfulness of life bears witness to the long existence of the trunk, which acts through its deep and stable roots. In liturgical matters, therefore, no real opposition should occur between the present age and previous ages; but all should be done so that, whatever be the innovation, it be made to cohere and to concord with the sound tradition that precedes it, and so that from existing forms new forms grow, as through spontaneously blossoming from it.

Sent without citation.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
36 Comments

LIVE BLOGGING FROM CASTLLLE DAAANGERRRR!

As we finish lunch we have been contemplating some potential Latin mottos for new bishops. Doesn’t it seem that many of the mottos on episcopal coats-of-arms get a bit repetitive? Even predictable?

RULES: Must be from Scripture. Cannot use Proverbs or Sirach.

We are coming up with a few suggestions.

For example….

  • Alexander aerarius multa mala mihi ostendit
  • Quis enim indicavit tibi quod nudus esses
  • Graece nosti
  • Neque in quo haurias

UPDATE:

  • Vipera a calore
  • Noli me tangere
  • Num custos fratris mei

UPDATE:

  • Coctione hac rufa
  • Post transmigrationem Babylonis
  • Dominus os asinae
  • Donec exeat per nares
  • Quis constituit te principem
  • Venisti huc ante tempus torquere nos
  • Quia pilosae manus
  • Sedens in sterquilinio
  • Duo ursi laceraverunt
  • Magna Diana Ephesiorum
  • Quicquid morticinum

UPDATE: Everything sounds better in Latin.

  • Centum quinquaginta tribus
  • Ceciditque Ohozias
Posted in Lighter fare |
78 Comments

Update on the gathering

Here in perilous CASTLLLLLE DAAANGERRRR! [/echo] things are going smoothly with good weather and great fraternity.

One of our bishop members had to leave, which is too bad, and some few priests joined the group yesterday as well.  Also, last night Rabbi Dalin joined us.  He is the author of The Myth of Hitler’s Pope and the outstanding Hitler’s Mufti and the Rise of Radical Islam. He will be talking with us about Pope Pius XII and about issues of relations between Jews and the Catholic Church. I have heard Rabbi Dalin before and he is an engaging speaker.

Yesterday I did some “short order” work for breakfast and will do the same this morning.  We had the beouf bourgignon last night and I am pleased to report that not a scrap was left over, though everyone was able to eat to satiety.  Today we will have the gazpacho soup for lunch.  Pasta tonight, I believe.

Posted in On the road | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

QUAERITUR: use of an old altar missal

From a reader:

I recently inherited a 1942 Benziger Bros altar Missal. The canon was modified to include St. Joseph by a past priest. Can this missal be licitly used by a priest, providing he was following the rubrics and calender of the 1962 Missal?

Sure.  If you don’t have a 1962 edition, then that old Missal can do – mutatis mutandis – in a pinch.   However, depending on the feast, you might have to double check your texts.

That said, make sure your priest and or your parish has a true 1962 Missale Romanum.  There are nice reprints which I reviewed here.

Every sacristy should have one or it is not adequately provisioned.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
5 Comments

QUAERITUR: Sunday obligation when at sea

From a reader:

My Grandparents are convinced that they are excused from their Sunday mass obligation because they will be out to sea on a Sunday without access to a Catholic priest. I’m worried that because they chose to go on this ship of their own free will without investigating the availability of a priest that they will fall into mortal sin if they go…your thoughts?

My thought is that if there is no priest, there is no Mass.  If there is no Mass, then there is in that occasion no way to fulfill the obligation.  Since no one is bound to do what is not possible, they on this occasion are not obliged to attend a Mass which is not taking place where they are.

However, when they return to shore, and if there is a Mass, and if it is a day of obligation, then they should go.

Keep in mind, dear reader, that when people are traveling, depending on the circumstances, the obligation on a day of precept is somewhat attenuated.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
77 Comments

GUEST POST: Christ’s love isn’t just warm feelings: it’s His death on the Cross.

Over at Bonfire of the Vanities Fr. Martin Fox has posted the text of his Sunday sermon (18th Sunday of Ordinary Time).   It was about Holy Mass, sacrifice, participation… why we have Mass.

For a long time I have been saying rather bluntly, we go to Mass and participation, in the final analysis, because one day we are all going to die.

That said, here are Fr. Fox’s concluding points. Be sure to read the rest over there:

Our nation is in a financial crisis–and we all wonder how it will work out.
Our world is in a spiritual crisis.
The fate of governments and the economy, the end of wars and famine,
are ultimately about whether we will accept Christ as our king.
And if you want to pray for our nation, for family, for the world–
there is no more powerful prayer than Jesus giving his all on the Cross!

We just heard Paul say that nothing can conquer the love of Christ–it will triumph.
But the “love of Christ” isn’t just his warm feelings for us: it’s his death on the Cross.
It’s the Mass!

In the first reading, God promised to renew his “everlasting covenant” with us.

In the Eucharistic prayer we pray at every Mass, we hear Jesus say, “this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant… shed so that sins may be forgiven.”

In a moment, I’ll go to that altar and I will offer this Sacrifice.
Know that I am completely unworthy of it.
It truly frightens me because I am a sinner.
That’s how awesome this is. Pray for me, please. Join with me.

Posted in Brick by Brick, HONORED GUESTS, Mail from priests, One Man & One Woman |
14 Comments