QUAERITUR: To whom should I write?

From a reader:

I’m just returning from a confession where the priest used the words “He absolves” instead of “I absolve.” The priest was a Benedictine who
is the pastor of a Diocesan parish. So do I write to the bishop, whose parish it was, or the Abbot of the priest’s community. We have a good bishop here, who would understand the seriousness of this, especially when it’s his flock who pays the price. But I have less confidence writing the priest’s Abbot would bring any results. What’s the proper protocol? I have a letter to the bishop typed up, and I’ll probably wait for your response before I drop it in the mail.

If you have a concern about the validity of the administration of a sacrament in a concrete situation, you have the right – and perhaps obligation – to to write to the local bishop or to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

If you want to write, in my humble opinion, you should first write to the local bishop.  Keep copies of everything.

Remember: since this concerns the Sacrament of Penance, the priest is bound by the Seal. He cannot confirm or deny anything about what happened. That doesn’t mean that the local bishop could not have a one way conversation with the priest, or the pastor of the parish, reaffirming what the proper form of the sacrament is.

Finally, consider also this: there has been a lot of confusion in the formation of priests over the last decades. Don’t be harsh in your letter. Relate only FACTS.

Check my tips for writing to ecclesiastical authorities.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
Comments Off on QUAERITUR: To whom should I write?

BENEDICT XVI’S PRAYER INTENTIONS FOR JANUARY 2011

BENEDICT XVI’S PRAYER INTENTIONS FOR JANUARY 2011

General Intention: That the riches of creation be preserved, valued and made available to all, as a precious gifts from God to mankind.

Missionary Intention: That Christians may achieve full unity, bearing witness of the universal fatherhood of God to the entire human race.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

What were the biggest stories of 2010?

What were the biggest Catholic stories of 2010?

Let’s get some suggestions and then maybe I can organize a poll for some voting.

Posted in The Drill |
21 Comments

NCR’s very first “Person of the Year”: Sr. Carol Keehan

NCR's very first "Person of the Year": Sr. Carol KeehanNational Catholic Reporter has named Sr. Carol Keehan as their very first “Person of the Year”.

Even though she was head of the Catholic Health Association, a political lobby group, before 2009 Sr. Keehan was relatively unimportant.

Then Sr. Keehan, as an exponent of the Magisterium of Nuns facing off against the Catholic Bishops, gave cover to “catholic” pro-abortion politicians to vote in favor of legislation that would ultimately provide taxpayer money for abortions.

BNCR's very first "Person of the Year": Sr. Carol Keehanut this honor NCR is giving to Sr. Keehan isn’t really about her opposing bishops or bishops’ conferences.

This isn’t really about nuns being persecuted by a Vatican investigation.

This isn’t really about the conflict between women and bishops or women’s roles.

This certainly isn’t about compassion for the poor, or health care.

Sr. Keehan’s award is about abortion, and bringing the abortion business into “catholic” hospitals.

NCR is offering Sr. Carol Keehan as the acceptable Catholic face, the poster person, for compassionate access to abortion for poor women.

NCR honors Sr. Keehan because this year she did more than anyone else to change the perception that Catholics must oppose abortion.

Quite a legacy.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Magisterium of Nuns | Tagged , , , ,
51 Comments

Possible reception of 5 Anglican Bishops, their wives, and 3 Nuns at Westminster Cathedral tomorrow

My friend Fr. John Boyle posted this at his blog Caritas in veritate.  Be sure to visit him for follow up news.

Reception of Five Anglican Bishops, their wives, and three Nuns at Westminster Cathedral tomorrow
I have heard on the grapevine that five former Anglican bishops, their wives and three former Anglican nuns from Walshinghas are to be received into the full communion of the Catholic Chuch at 12.30pm tomorrow, New Years Day, at Westminster Cathedral.
I presume that the former bishops concerned (and their former dioceses) are: Andrew Burnham (Ebbsfleet), Keith Newton (Richborough), John Broadhurst (Fulham), Edwin Barnes (assistant bishop, Winchester) and David Silk (assistant bishop, Exeter).
This will be the first step on the road to the eventual establishment of the Ordinariate for former Anglicans who wish to be in full communion with the Catholic Church.
I have found nothing about this anywhere on the internet, which all seems rather strange. It is, surely, a momentous occasion.

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

WDTPRS KUDOS to this courageous bishops and… welcome.

Posted in Mail from priests, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
19 Comments

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

Pope Benedict will soon (as of the time of this writing) be in the Vatican Basilica for 1st Vespers of the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God, followed by the singing of the Te Deum for the close of this year of salvation.  Then he will go to visit the Presepio in St. Peter’s Square.

I am streaming this on Fr Z TV.

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

UPDATE:

Here are a few rapid sketches from his sermon, delivered in Italian.  He makes some references to specific issues for the Diocese of Rome (he is the bishop there, after all) which I have reduced to more generic references:

In the Person of Christ Jesus, God entered into man’s time and remains with us.

With the coming of Christ, we are in the fullness of time.

Christmas calls to mind this fullness of time and the salvation He brought.

Man’s time is burdened with evils (carico di mali), sufferings, drama of every kind, those provoked by man and those brought by natural disasters.  But in a definitive way we have the new joy and liberating joy of Christ the Savior.

In the Babe of Bethlehem we can contemplate the encounter with eternity in time, which the liturgy of the Church loves to express.

Christmas helps us see God made flesh humble and helpless as a baby.  Doesn’t this help us see God love in the difficult times of daily life?

At the end of 2010, before consigning these days to the merciful justice of God, I need to raise our thanks to Him for His love for us.

The Church of Rome is tasked to help all the baptized live faithfull their vocations.  to be Christians we must meditate on the Word of God.  I want to encourage this through a lectio divina.

The Word of God was made flesh for us and His Truth is accesible to all men and all cultures.

The privileged place for hearing the Word of God is the celebration of the Eucharist.  I want to encourage pastors and priests to attend to the pastoral program I gave (for the Diocese of Rome).

Nourish by Christ we also are drawn to the same act of total self-gift that drove the Lord to give His own life, revealing in that way the immense love of the Father.  The witness of charity, therefore, is an essential theological dimension united to the proclamation of the Word of God.

This time of anxiety for the precarious state of families begs us to be clsoe to those who are in poverty and distress.  May God, infinite love, enflame our hearts with charity.

“Dear brothers and sisters, we are invited to look to the future and regard it with that hope which is the final word of the Te Deum: “In te, Domine, speravi: non confundar in aeternum! – Lord, have I hoped.  Let me not be confounded in eternity.”  In giving ourselves to Christ, our Hope, you, O Mother God, are always present.  As once to the shepherds and Magi, may your arms and even more your heart continue to offer the world the Jesus, your Son and our Savior.  In Him is all our hope, for from Him come the salvation and peace of every man.  Amen!”

A few images:

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

1st Vespers with the Holy Father

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

Another Vatican website quirk concerning Summorum Pontificum

Under another entry in the combox, our friend iPadre pointed out that, at the time of this writing. on the Vatican website, the Supreme Pontiff’s Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum is still provided only in

Latin and Hungarian.

Another Vatican website quirk concerning Summorum Pontificum

Languages equally comprehensible to liberals.

Does this seem right to you?

This is an important document of a Pope’s pontificate.

Another Vatican website quirk concerning Summorum Pontificum

Shouldn’t it be in the main languages in which the Holy See released documents including, say, English?

Do the people who run that website, or oversee those who do, not think the Holy Father’s documents are important?

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
38 Comments

Pages removed from Vatican’s online 1960 “Acta Apostolicae Sedis”: Rubrics of Breviary and Missal

The Vatican website’s OCR copy of AAS 52 has blank pages for pp. 593-740.

John XXIII’s new code of rubrics, “Rubricae breviarii et missalis Romani,” is on pp. 622-42.

Those inclined to look for conspiracies might wonder whether someone were withholding this key resource for the old Mass.

On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence of incompetence regarding the website elsewhere.  And typos abound in these pdf’s.  They abound.

Still, this is pretty strange.  I think we can assume that those pages in AAS 52 were not themselves blank.

Here is a screenshot of the index:

Pages removed from Vatican's online 1960 "Acta Apostolicae Sedis": Rubrics of Breviary and Missal

There would almost have to have a been an explicit choice to leave that section out.

Why?

Cui bono?

Pages removed from Vatican's online 1960 "Acta Apostolicae Sedis": Rubrics of Breviary and Missal

In any event, let’s assume that this was all a big mistake and hope that whoever is in charge of that online resource will, for the sake of – I don’t know – completeness?  honesty? – correct the online version.

On a side note, also in this volume is the decree placing the infamous Poem of the Man God on the Index of Prohibited Books (p.60) and a decree on whether or not Communion can be distributed after noon (p.355), as well as when the Leonine Prayers could be omitted (p. 360) and the official text of the Litany of the Most Precious Blood (p. 412).

It is interesting to page through these volumes.

UPDATE 4 January 2010 2001 GMT:

I received an e-mail about this which, in fairness, I must share with you.

Dear Fr Zuhlsdorf,
thank you for your blog. I am a daily reader of it.

From 2005 to 2010 I worked in the Vatican and I happen to know the person who scanned the whole AAS collection which is now on th website. It might be a useful backround information that:

1) This was the work of a voluntary helper (more than 100.000 pages of “manual” scanning, one page after the other, all done by one person).
We should thank him.
2) When one person of the website team heard about these files, he decided to publish them. There was no time and personell to do corrections and they acted according to the principle “better this version than nothing; if we get something better in the future, we can still replace it”.
3) About AAS 1960: The voluntary helper consulted three copies in two libraries and all of them were incomplete. For now he just did not find the missing pages. I have informed him about your article and he told me that he will search in other libraries.

So, there are no second intentionts or conspiracies in all this (…
but it could still be useful to invite your readers to send messages to the Vatican about the missing translations of Summorum Pontificum on the website and other issues). I am sorry that this was and is “above my paygrade”.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
18 Comments

Kathryn Jean Lopez on MTV’s pro-teen abortion reality show

Kathryn Jean Lopez has a new article on the disturbing special run on MTV
(aka evil media sewer) earlier this week, in which a young woman from the reality TV show 16 and Pregnant decides to have an abortion, and MTV’s failed attempt to normalize
the procedure and downplay the consequences.

You can read Kathryn Jean Lopez’s full article, “Not That Innocent”, here.  It is in it’s entirety a bit long, but here is some of it, edited and with my emphases and comments.

Not That Innocent
by Kathryn Jean Lopez

“Woe to you if you do not succeed in defending life.”

That was the urgency with which the late John Paul II spoke of the stakes before us in combating a Culture of Death, during his 1993 World Youth Day visit to the United States.

I think I heard John Paul II wail on Tuesday night, the feast of the Holy Innocents, commemorating King Herod’s massacre.

Before the day was through, MTV aired the reality-TV show No Easy Decision, on which Markai Durham, a recent graduate of MTV’s 16 and Pregnant, had an abortion. I assume the scheduling wasn’t intentional, but it was a remarkable coincidence.

The show was dedicated to relaying the impression that the girl is all right, when she clearly isn’t.

Having missed an appointment for an injection of the birth-control shot Depo Provera, Markai found herself pregnant for a second time.

“You will never feel my pain,” she told the father of her two children, one eight months old on the show, one eliminated on it.

Her cry came after she yelled at James for being “harsh” in calling her aborted baby a “thing.” This all came just moments after, while relaying what happened inside the abortion clinic, she insisted: “Don’t call that thing a baby. That’s exactly what it is: a thing.” But she really couldn’t lie to herself. So she went on to naturally look across at her living daughter Zakaria and tell James, “A thing can turn out like that. … Nothing but a bunch of cells can be her.”

When she aborted six weeks into her pregnancy, we knew she considered her child as more than “a thing” or “a bunch of cells” – even before her post-abortion pangs of sadness and second thoughts. In the early moments of the MTV special, she announced, “I’m in love with this baby already.” [I am beginning to wonder about what sort of pressure was put on the poor girl.]

But she feared that she and James – not married even though each claims to be devoted to the other –would never have the money to pull off raising a second child without further sacrifices. She announced that she couldn’t handle the emotion of going through the pregnancy only to give up the child in an adoption. She told the MTV cameras: “Having two kids in my teenager years. It’s not the right time.”

“We can’t give Zakaria everything.” Had she not aborted, she said, “We would have to sacrifice more stuff, I mean we would have to sacrifice her life.” [“stuff”…. “life”…]

Well, of course, someone’s life was.

Markai went on: “I wouldn’t choose abortion, I mean, as a first option for anybody. It’s the toughest decision ever to make in your life. But this was the best choice for me.”  [We’ll see.]

And she ended with a hope for healing a wound that MTV was insisting wasn’t there: “With the love of my life and my daughter, I know I’ll make it through.”

Some of the post-show commentary worried that Markai would be vilified for what, by the end of the show, was presented as a “responsible … parenting decision” by Dr. Drew Pinsky’s panel of teen-abortion alums. [There’s perspective for ya!]

But please aim your vilification at the abortion industry and its abettors on MTV’s delusional TV show.

The first thing we saw Markai doing when she told us she’s pregnant a second time is get on the Internet and get the number for an abortion clinic. She called and began with a basic, clinical question about what kinds of abortions they provide. But then she got to what she really wanted to know: How would she feel afterwards? The woman on the other end, hearing the fear in her voice, walked her closer to feeling that she has no choice but abortion: “If you’re really stressed out about it, you know, it might be a relief to have it over with. “

Once she got to the abortion clinic, only clinic staff could be in the room with her. Afterwards Markai recounted their advice: “Don’t think of it as ten fingers and ten toes with a forehead and all that stuff. Because if you think of it like that, you’re going to make yourself depressed. …Think of it as what it is: a little ball of cells.” Markai would later try talking herself into it: “Which is exactly what it is.”

Completely ignoring the pain so many women – and men – have relayed in the wake of 38 years of legal abortion, MTV’s sex-ed guru and house psychiatrist, Drew Pinsky, announced: “Most women two years after they’ve had the procedure, believe they’ve made the right decision.”

[…]

But No Easy Decision was an indictment of more than MTV. When was the last time any of us did anything to promote adoption? When was the last time any of us gave a thought to children stuck in the foster-care system? When was the last time we opened our hearts and homes? When was the last time we helped make life a little bit easier for someone who has?

[…]

The Holy Innocents Gospel from Saint Matthew reads:

A voice was heard in Ramah,
sobbing and loud lamentation;
Rachel weeping for her children,
and she would not be consoled,
since they were no more.

And so, too, does Markai Durham. We should hear her cries, not help her mask them.

But it’s not just teen mothers wailing. I think I hear the Communion of Saints doing the same for us. We’re the laborers called to live and proclaim the Gospel of Life, to make it a real choice in the life of a girl like Markai. Woe to us if we don’t succeed in answering that call in each of our lives.

Kathryn Jean Lopez is editor-at-large of National Review Online and a nationally syndicated columnist. She speaks frequently on faith and public life.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can I continue to be an Extraordinary Minister of Communion?

From a reader asked a question about the post I made about the document Ecclesia de mysterio, which among other things requires that we avoid using Extraordinary Ministers of Communion to often or in too many numbers when circumstances don’t really require them.

If an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion is fully aware of a
document such as Ecclesia de mysterio and the uses and limitations of
their ministry, can they in all good conscience continue in that role
if he or she continues to be asked to serve on a regular basis at
inappropriate occasions? Could it be construed as sinful to continue
in that role if they know what they are doing is wrong in the light of
such documents?

I don’t know it it is sinful or not.  I think that depends on the circumstances.  It could be that if a person is in the role at a parish where the pastor is determined to have them no matter what, it would be better to stay in the role and ensure that what is done is as reverent as possible rather than turn it over to people who would not to a good job of it.

What this suggests to me is that priests and bishops who allow this to go on abusively are perhaps placing good lay people in occasions of sin during the most sacred things we have as Catholics, Holy Mass.

An accounting for this practices will have to be made one day.  If priests defy their bishops in this matter, and the bishop does nothing, nevertheless, the priest will one day stand before the judge.  So will the bishop.  If the officials of the Holy See ignore their part in this, they will be held to account as well.

I have no idea what that accounting will result in.  Perhaps they are doing the right thing.  Perhaps they aren’t.  The Just Judge, King of Fearful Majesty, will know how to sort this out.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
10 Comments