Daily Rome Shot 851

Photo from The Great Roman™

Welcome new registrants:

nithinmathew
prestbury
Mary Y
popshots
Zeddy
Tbone

Meanwhile,… white to move and mate in TWO. Think fast!

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

I just learned that actor Michael Gambon died in September.  He was a regular chess player.  R.I.P.

Need to move? Want to move?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 5th Sunday after Epiphany (N.O.: 32nd) 2023

Share the good stuff.

It’s the 5th Sunday Remaining after Epiphany in the Vetus Ordo and the 32nd Sunday of the Novus Ordo.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Sunday Mass of obligation?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass. I hear that it is growing. Of COURSE.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?  We really need good news.

I have some thoughts about the Sunday Epistle reading posted at One Peter Five.

As we approach the end of the liturgical year, an odd thing happens in the Church’s traditional calendar for the Vetus Ordo. The Sundays left over after Epiphany are finally dusted off, “resumed,” and prayed until the liturgical year is concluded. This is because of the vagaries of the Moon and shifting date of Easter and, therefore, Septuagesima, Ash Wednesday and, naturally, Pentecost itself. In some years the Sundays after Pentecost don’t take us all the way to Advent. Thus, we fill the gap with the post-Epiphany Sundays that we didn’t get to before Septuagesima Sunday. Get it? Even so, last week was the 23rd Sunday after Pentecost. This week we have the formulary for the 5th Sunday after Epiphany. Next week will be the 6th Sunday after Epiphany. To bring the year to a close we have the 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost.  After that is the 1st Sunday of Advent.

We have already seen our Epistle for this Sunday, the 5th Sunday Remaining after Epiphany – Colossians 3: 12-17 – way back for the Feast of the Holy Family.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
7 Comments

“There is a great deal of talk about loyalty from the bottom up. Loyalty from the top down is even more necessary.”

I spotted this and it made me think of the potential –  perhaps more and more real – of the the burden of moral injury on the part of faithful, traditionally-minded priests.

Maybe they are cowards. Maybe they are ambitious. Maybe they are ideologues.  Maybe they are entirely tuned-out.

It is a terrible thing to sense, and even worse to know, that those above you not only do not have your back, but they probably hate you.

Posted in Cri de Coeur | Tagged ,
8 Comments

26 November 2023 – STIR UP SUNDAY

26 November 2023 will be the 34th and Last Sunday after Pentecost, the last Sunday of this liturgical year.  That means it will be

STIR UP SUNDAY!

Make your plans now so you don’t have to rush around or find that you can’t get certain ingredients.

The “stir up” comes from the first words of the traditional Collect at Mass of the Last Sunday of the Year.

Excita, [Stir up!] quaesumus. Dómine, tuórum fidélium voluntátes: ut, divíni óperis fructum propénsius exsequéntes; pietátis tuæ remédia maióra percípiant.

Many stir up the ingredients for their Christmas puddings on Stir Up Sunday, and steam it, so that it has adequate time to set before the big day.

What are YOUR pudding plan?

Find a recipe, make a plan with the family, and make a Christmas pudding (or two) this year!

You can help me with the ingredients and win my gratitude as well as remembrance among the benefactors I pray for at Mass.

Think about getting your Christmas shopping done early.

First, remember always… always… to use my links when you shop online on Amazon.  US HERE – UK HERE

Thanks in advance!

Also, I might hit up a friend “up north” to send me some real holly.

In the meantime, here – once again this year – are images from a book I recall from my distant childhood, depicting “Max” preparing what I now – at long last – understand to be a Christmas Pudding!  As an (American) kid I had always wondered what he was making.

Any resemblance to hamsters – once on sidebars – is entirely intentional.

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

MAX's Christmas Pudding

Yes, sometimes our best plans and efforts blow up in our faces.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 850

I’m back in my old chair.  *sigh*  And what news comes in?  *sigh*

I think I’m coming down with something.

Welcome registrants:

RTservo
Baron Frank

Meanwhile, I’ve asked for prayers to Bl. Luigi Maria Monti for Giancarlo.  He was rushed to the hospital yesterday in mortal peril.  Some 5 liters of fluid was drained from his abdomen, liver and kidneys pretty much shot.   At this moment he is not in immediate danger, but please pray for spiritual protection for him and for a “sudden, complete and lasting miracle through the intercession of Bl. Luigi Maria Monti.

Thanksgiving is coming and I recommend beer by the traditional Benedictines of Norcia.  It will go perfectly with the sorts of things people serve for Thanksgiving.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.

Meanwhile,… find the best move for white.

 

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

Pause. Ask your guardian angel to guard you.  Done? Bp. Strickland. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Pause for a moment, now, and ask your guardian angel to guard you.  Don’t be flowery.  Ask.

We have all read with unsurprised shock the announcement in today’s Bollettino, ironically under “rinuncie e nomine… resignations and appointments”.

Sollevamento del Vescovo di Tyler (U.S.A.) e nomina dell’Amministratore Apostolico

Il Santo Padre ha sollevato dal governo pastorale della Diocesi di Tyler (U.S.A.) S.E. Mons. Joseph E. Strickland e ha nominato il Vescovo di Austin, S.E. Mons. Joe Vásquez, come Amministratore Apostolico della Diocesi resasi vacante.

In Italian, “sollevamento” is what you do in weightlifting. Bp. S got the “heave ho”.

It seems to me that they’ve created a martyr. John Henry Weston of LifeSite says he interviewed Bp. Strickland who said:

I stand by all the things that were listed as complaints against me. I know I didn’t implement Traditionis Custodes [the Pope Francis decree restricting the Traditional Latin Mass] because I can’t starve out part of my flock.” He added, “I’d do it the same way again. I feel very much at peace in the Lord and the Truth that He died for.

More than one thing. However, one seems to have been the big one.

I suspect we will see many more instances of cancelling now.

Were any of us surprised to read this news? Not a bit. It was merely a matter of timing. As one priest friend wrote to me: When a man plays blackjack and asks for a hit, he gets hit.

To use another image, if they are not shooting at you, you are not over the target.

No reasons were listed in the announcement.  This was a personal decision of Francis. There seems not to have been a formal canonical procedure, which is the regular way of things in the Church to maintain good order.   I suspect my vaticanisti friends back in Rome are asking questions in the Press Office… and receiving no answers. [More below]

My fear from this is that many of the faithful will be terribly scandalized and demoralized, perhaps to the point of making unhealthy decisions about their spiritual lives.

A couple weeks back in Rome I met Bp. Strickland for the first time face to face.  We had a good conversation.  During the course of the conference when there was prayer, I tuned in on him a little, because I know he has a strong discipline of prayer.  “Yup”, I thought, “He prays.”

This discipline of prayer will be important for him in the near and far future.   He’s going to have to decide how to deal with this.  There will be great pressure on him now.

Prayer will be important to us in filtering and deciphering what his treatment means.

My strong suggesting is that if you find a story or podcast – I saw a bit of one yesterday by a lunatic spouting crazy stuff about Strickland – if you simply can’t pass it over, then ask your guardian angel to protect you while you spend time on it.

Can you take a little time in your day today to say at least a decade of the Rosary for Bp. Strickland?

Also, remember, if there is anyone out there who harmed you, or harmed someone near you, if there is anyone out there whom you are really struggling not to be angry at or even to hate, pray for that person.  It is really hard to maintain angry or hateful thoughts toward someone for whom you are regularly and sincerely praying.

If they hate us, let’s not return the favor.

UPDATES:

Perhaps p. Strickland has been “Bynged”. As Voltaire would say: “Il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres.”

Posted in Si vis pacem para bellum!, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged ,
49 Comments

Public service announcement: Card. Müller’s responses to dubia

UPDATE: On a related note, at One Peter Five find the transcript and video of Card. Sarah’s recent talk at the presentation (HERE) of Bp. Schneider’s catechetical Compendium.    Card. Sarah’s talk dealt with the crisis in the Church.  He has a good insight: It is not a crisis of the Church, it is a crisis of the Church’s pastors.   HERE


I’m on the road and my time and tools are limited. However, I was sent this, which I thought might be helpful for those with more time and tools to work on.
Gerhard Card. Müller released his own responses to the dubia sent by the Brazilian bishop to Rome about trans stuff and same sex stuff.

I’m sure these are offered as a kind of “PSA… Public Service Announcement” to help people.

(Also, Card. Müller did an interview with LifeSite.  He is really making himself visible and audible.  I heard him speak at the Rome Forum recently.)

Okay… no sooner did I start this but I found that Maike had posted a translation.  HERE

This is how it starts:

The task of the Roman Magisterium, be it directly the Pope’s or mediated by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, is to faithfully preserve the truth of Divine Revelation. It is instituted by Christ and works in the Holy Spirit so that the Catholic faithful are protected from all heresies that jeopardize salvation and from any confusion in matters of doctrine and moral life (cf. Vatican II, Lumen Gentium 18;23).

The dicastery’s answers to various questions from a Brazilian bishop (November 3, 2023) on the one hand remind us of generally known truths of faith, but on the other hand, they also open up to the misunderstanding that there is, after all, room for a coexistence of sin and grace in the Church of God.

Müller text in German:

Klarstellung
zu den Antworten des DDF auf die Fragen von Bischof Negri
Von Gerhard Cardinal Müller, Rom

Die Aufgabe des römischen Lehramtes, sei es des Papstes direkt oder vermittelt durch das Dikasterium für die Glaubenslehre, ist es, die Wahrheit der göttlichen Offenbarung treu zu bewahren. Es ist von Christus eingesetzt und wirkt im Heiligen Geist, damit die katholischen Gläubigen vor allen Irrlehren, die das Heil gefährden, und jeder Verwirrung in Fragen der Lehre und des sittlichen Lebens geschützt werden (vgl.II. Vatikanum, Lumen gentium 18;23).

Die Antworten des Dikasteriums auf diverse Fragen eines brasilianischen Bischofs (3. November 2023) erinnern einerseits an allgemein bekannte Glaubenswahrheiten, öffnen anderseits aber auch wieder Türen zu dem Missverständnis, dass für die Koexistenz von Sünde und Gnade in der Kirche Gottes doch ein Spielraum wäre.

Die Taufe ist die Tür zum Neuen Leben in Christus

Der Sohn Gottes, unser Erlöser und das Haupt der Kirche, die sein Leib ist, hat das Sakrament der Taufe eingesetzt, damit alle Menschen durch den Glauben an Christus und ein Leben in seiner Nachfolge zum ewigen Leben gelangen können. Die bedingungslose Liebe Gottes befreit den Menschen aus der tödlichen Herrschaft der Sünde, die den Menschen ins Unglück stürzt und von Gott, der Quelle des Lebens trennt. Der universale Heilswille Gottes (1 Tim 2, 4f) besagt nicht, dass wir uns nur mit  den Lippen zu Jesus als unserem Herrn zu bekennen brauchen, um ins Reich Gottes zu gelangen, während wir uns mit Verweis auf die menschliche Schwäche von der Erfüllung des heiligen und heiligenden Willens Gottes dispensieren lassen (vgl. Mt 7, 21-23)

Die simple Metapher „die Kirche ist keine Zollstation“, die besagen soll, dass der Christi nicht bürokratisch am Buchstaben des Gesetztes gemessen werden darf, hat ihre Grenzen dort, wo es um die Gnade geht, die uns zu einem neuen Leben jenseits von Sünde und Tod führt. Der Apostel Paulus sagt, dass wir alle „Sklaven der Sünde“ waren, bevor wir zum Glauben an Christus kamen. Jetzt aber sind wird durch die Taufe auf den Namen Christi, des Sohnes Gottes und des Gesalbten des Heiligen Geistes, „von Herzen der Lehre gehorsam geworden, an die wir übergeben worden sind.“ Wir dürfen also nicht sündigen, weil wir nicht mehr dem Gesetz unterstehen, sondern wir dürfen nicht mehr sündigen, weil wir der Gnade unterstehen. „Daher soll die Sünde euren sterblichen Leib nicht beherrschen, und seinen Begierden sollt ihr nicht mehr gehorchen…als Menschen, die vom Tod zum Leben gekommen sind.“ (Röm 6, 12f).

In der ältesten, zu Rom verfassten Kirchenordnung (um 200 n.Chr.), werden die Kriterien der Zulassung oder Zurückweisung (oder auch nur Zurückstellung) zum Katechumenat und zum Empfang der Taufe genannt und verlangt, dass alle zweifelhaften Berufe, illegalen Partnerschaften und unmoralischen Verhaltensweisen, die dem Gnadenleben der Taufe widersprechen, aufgegeben werden müssen (Traditio Apostolica 15-16).

Der hl. Thomas von Aquin, der in den Antworten des Dikasteriums löblicherweise zitiert wird, gibt auf die Frage, ob die Sünder getauft werden können, die differenzierte zweifache Antwort:

  1. Gewiss können die Sünder, die in der Vergangenheit persönlich gesündigt haben und unter der Macht der „Sünde Adams“ (d.h. der Ur- und Erbsünde) standen, getauft werden. Denn die Taufe ist eingesetzt zur Vergebung der Sünden, die Christus uns durch seinem Tod am Kreuz erworben hat.
  2. Denen allerdings, „die Sünder sind, weil sie mit dem Vorsatz zur Taufe kommen, weiterhin zu sündigen“ und damit dem heiligen Willen Gottes zu widerstehen, können nicht getauft werden. Das gilt nicht nur wegen des inneren Widerspruchs von der Gnade Gottes zu uns und unserer Sünde gegen Gott, sondern auch wegen des falschen Zeugnisses nach außen, das die Glaubwürdigkeit der kirchlichen Verkündigung unterminiert, weil die Sakramente Zeichen sind der Gnade, die sie vermitteln (vgl. Thomas von Aquin, Summa theologiae III q. III Quaestio 68, Artikel 4).

In der Falle transhumanistischer Terminologie

Es ist verwirrend und schädlich, wenn sich das Lehramt auf die der Terminologie einer nihilistischen und atheistischen Anthropologie einlässt und damit deren wahrheitswidrigen Inhalten den Satus einer legitimen theologischen Meinung in der Kirche zu verleihen scheint. „Habt ihr nicht gelesen- so sagt Jesus zu den Pharisäern, „die ihm eine Falle stellen wollten- dass der Schöpfer die Menschen am Anfang als Mann und Frau geschaffen hat?“ (Mt 19, 4)

In Wahrheit gibt es weder in der Ordnung der geschöpflichen Natur noch in der Gnade des Neuen Bundes in Christus transsexuelle oder homophile (homoaffektive oder homosexuelle) Personen. In der Logik der Schöpfers von Mensch und Welt genügen zwei Geschlechter um den Fortbestand der Menschheit zu sichern und um die Kinder in der familiären Gemeinschaft mit ihrem Vater und ihrer Mutter aufblühen zu lassen.

„Person“, das weiß jeder Philosoph und Theologe, ist der Mensch in seiner geistigen und sittlichen Individualität, die ihn unmittelbar auf Gott seinen Schöpfer und Erlöser bezieht. Jede menschliche Person existiert aber in der geistig-leiblichen Natur und konkret entweder als Mann oder Frau durch den Akt der Schöpfung, in dem Gott ihn oder sie (und in der wechselseitiger Bezogenheit in der Ehe) zu seinem Gleichnis seiner ewigen Güte und dreieinigen Liebe gemacht hat. Und so wie er geschaffen worden ist, wird Gott jeden Mensch auch in seinem weiblichen oder männlichen Leib auferwecken ohne sich von denen irritieren zu lassen, die (für viel Geld) andere Menschen gentital verstümmelt haben, oder die -durch falsche Propaganda verwirrt- sich freiwillig um ihre männliche oder weibliche Identität haben betrügen lassen.

Der Transhumanismus in all seinen Varianten und ist eine diabolische Fiktion und eine Versündigung an der personalen Würde des Menschen, auch wenn er in der Form des Transsexualismus terminologisch als „selbstbestimmte Geschlechtsumwandlung“ beschönigt wird. Für Lehre und Praxis gilt der römischen Kirche schreibt klar vor: „Die Dirne, der Unzucht treibende Mann, derjenige, der sich selbst verstümmelt, und jeder andere, der etwas tut, worüber man nicht spricht [1 Kor 6, 6-20), soll [vom Katechumenat und der Taufe] abgewiesen werden.“(Traditio Apostolica 16).

Die „gesunde Lehre“ (1 Tim 4, 3) ist die heilsame Pastoral

Das pastorale Motiv, das die Sünder gegen das sechste und neunte Gebot des Dekalogs möglichst „sanft und verständnisvoll“ behandelt sehen will, ist lobenswert nur solange der Seelsorger nicht wie ein schlechter Arzt seinen Patienten über die Schwere seiner Krankheit täuscht, sondern nur wenn der gute Hirte „mit dem Himmel sich mehr freut über einen einzigen Sünder, der Buße tut, als über neunundneunzig Gerechte, die es [in falscher Selbsteinschätzung] nicht nötig haben umzukehren.“ (Lk 15, 6). Hier ist auch grundlegend zu unterscheiden zwischen dem (einmaligen) Sakrament der Taufe, das alle bisherigen Sünden tilgt und uns mit dem bleibenden Charakter des Eingefügtseins in den Leib Christi ausstattet, und dem (wiederholbaren) Sakrament der Buße, durch das die Sünden vergeben werden, die wir nach der Taufe begangen haben.

Es ist gemäß der Heilsorge der Kirche immer richtig, dass ein Kind getauft werden kann und soll, dessen katholische Erziehung von den Verantwortlichen, gerade auch durch ein vorbildliches Leben, garantiert werden kann.

Kein Zweifel aber kann die Kirche lassen an dem natürlichen Recht eines Kindes, bei seinen eigenen leiblichen Eltern aufzuwachsen bzw. im Notfall bei seinen Adoptiveltern, die sittlich legitim an ihre Stelle treten. Jede Form von Leihmutterschaft oder der Produktion eines Kindes im Laboratorium (wie eine Sache) zur Befriedigung egoistischer Wünsche ist in katholischer Sicht eine schwere Verletzung der Person-Würde eines Menschen, den Gott durch seine eigene Mutter und seinen eigen Vater leiblich und geistig ins Dasein verfügt hat, um ihn zur Gotteskindschaft im ewigen Leben zu berufen.

Warum Gott nur durch den rechten Glauben die Kirche aufbaut

Im Zusammenhang mit der Synode über die Synodalität wurde oft die biblische Formulierung bemüht: „Wer Ohren hat, höre, was der Geist den Gemeinden sagt“ (Offb  2,11). Gemeint ist im letzten Buch der Heiligen Schrift „die Treue zum Wort Gottes und dem Zeugnis Jesu Christi“ (Offb 1,2). Der Verfasser der Traditio Apostolica im Rom der Apostelfürsten Petrus und Paulus ist davon überzeugt, dass der „Aufbau der Kirche bewirkt wird durch die Annahme des rechten Glaubens“.  Er beschließt seine Schrift mit den bedenkenswerten Worten: „Denn wenn alle die apostolische Überlieferung hören, sie befolgen und beachten, wird euch kein Häretiker noch irgendein anderer Mensch in die Irre führen können. Denn die vielen Häresien sind dadurch hochgekommen, dass die Vorsteher [Bischöfe] sich über die Lehren der Apostel nicht haben belehren lassen wollen, sondern nach eigenem Gutdünken gehandelt haben und nicht, wie es sich geziemte. Wenn wir etwas vergessen haben, Geliebte, so wird Gott es denen offenbaren, die würdig sind. Er leitet nämlich die Kirche, damit sie den Hafen seiner Ruhe erreicht.“ (Traditio Apostolica 43).

Posted in Pò sì jiù, Sin That Cries To Heaven, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

NOT ROME 23/10 – Day 41: My View For Awhile – Last leg

UPDATE: When I updated this post from the airplane with the cat photo (below), I think the cat ate the chess puzzle.  Darn cats.

BLACK to move.  MATE in FOUR.   Use force!


In Rome I might have seen the sun rise at 06:51 and I could have, were I there, experienced the colors of its setting at 16:57.   Instead, where I am in Brooklyn the sun will set at 16:42, but I will be long gone by then.

The Ave Maria Bell, you ask?  Still at 17:30.

Today in the Novus Ordo calendar it is the Feast of Pope St. Leo I, “the Great” (+461), whose theology and latinity were stellar.   Leo had synods with bishops, by the way, during which he told them what was what.

It is the Feast of Andrea Avellino (+1608) with a commemoration of St. Trypho, who church was subsumed into Sant’Agostino which is why Trypho’s name remains with Sant’Agostino in the list of the Roman Stations for Lent.

Just to make sure that those who think I am avoiding writing about Card. Müller (whom I haven’t yet read, the latest stuff), here’s what my priest friend and I had to eat yesterday, probably the thing foremost on the minds of most of the readership… along with the solution to yesterday’s chess problem.  ‘Cause… you know… it’s called “Fr. Z’s Blog” for a reason.

Firstly, wait… let’s fill in a blank… yesterday we went out into deepest darkest Long Island to see a brand new cemetery chapel build by the Diocese of Rockville Centre.   I must say, they did a grand job of it.   The fact that they built a new church instead of closing one or selling one is already good.   This lovely little church was just consecrated last Sunday!  You could still smell chrism.

Not flashy or innovative, but very well done.

Three cloths, very good.

Alas, they have a picnic table, but the main altar is consecrated for use.

A good job.

UPDATE

Zipped through the process at the airport. I met a rather hairy passenger at security.

The expression – sort of how I feel at this stage of a trip.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

Some clear confusion emerges

By now you will have read something about a new document, responses to dubia that were submitted by a Brazilian bishops about “trans”, etc.   This is not just theological curiosity stuff, but rather practical problems that parish priests must deal with.

LifeSite has a summary of the dubia (questions official submitted to the appropriate authority of the Roman Curia needing official responses to bring greater clarity):

The questions are as follows, although the original July 14, 2023 request from Bishop Negri was not published:

Can a transgender person be baptized?
Can a transgender person be a godfather or godmother at baptism?
Can a transgender person be a witness at a wedding?
Can two homo-affective persons be counted as parents of a child, who must be baptized, and who was adopted or gained by other methods such as surrogacy?
Can a person who is homo-affective and cohabiting be godfather to a baptized person?
Can a person who is homo-affective and cohabiting be a witness at a wedding?

The answers from Card. Fernandez at the DDF?   There are vague aspects which do not resolve the dubia in their practical ramifications.   These are things that parish priests will have to deal with.  I suspect that now parishes will be targeted with test cases.  Perhaps the parish priests should just refer the question to the local bishop and refuse personally to deal with it immediately.

I will ask a couple questions about the question (#2) concerning godparents.

Fernandez said that, yes, transgender individuals could act as godparents at Baptism.

The Code of Canon Law 872 says that “a sponsor also helps the baptized person to lead a Christian life in keeping with baptism and to fulfill faithfully the obligations inherent in it.” Canon 874 speaks to the qualities of a sponsor, such as being “a Catholic who has been confirmed and has already received the most holy sacrament of the Eucharist and who leads a life of faith in keeping with the function to be taken on.”

So, does an unrepentant trans person (that is, being unrepentant about having undergone the process) fulfill these points of law?

There may be only one male sponsor or one female sponsor or one of each (canon 873), but if there are two sponsors, they should not be of the same sex. If there are two sponsors, one must be Catholic.

QUAERITUR: How can a transgendered person be a godparent since the Church doesn’t recognize a difference between biological sex and gender?

QUAERITUR: How can the Church recognize the suitability of a homosexual couple living more uxorio (committing same-sex acts together regularly) as witnesses to a sacramental matrimony without de facto admitting the moral good of homosexual acts?

About “gender”.  This word is misused.   It is not interchangeable with “sex”.

For priests in parishes… this is going to be hard.   Don’t feel that you must, on the spot, make a decision or give an answer.  Refer it “upstairs”.   Tread carefully.   You decision might have wider consequences.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Sin That Cries To Heaven, What are they REALLY saying? |
17 Comments

NOT ROME 23/10 – Day 40: Back in the USA and a quick glimpse of Rome

In Rome the sun rose without me at 06:50 and it will set at 16:58.  The Ave Maria Bell is to be at 17:30 but it won’t be rung.

It is the Anniversary of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica, some sources say the 1700th.

If anyone out there is name Theodore, it is your name day (martyr, soldier +306)

Where I am the sun will set at 16:43.

Welcome new registrants:

chibago
Joyce

Yesterdays flight was one of the most uncomfortable I’ve ever experienced because of the seat.

Comfort+.

HA!

There was virtually no resistance in the cushion, so it was mainly a metal bar.  10 hours.  I used blankets and a pillow.  That helped, but… whew.  It was awful.  Also, the “entertainment system” kept freezing up and rebooting.  Pull my ball cap down over my eyes and snooze till it comes back.

Entry to these USA was pretty easy.   Luggage came quickly.  No traffic outside so my ride was right there.

For supper we went to a place called….

And we had…

Not Chicago style beef sandwiches, for sure, but really good.  Fantastic onion rings, too.

Which drink is mine?

Moving… hard to get a clean shot.

Meanwhile, back in Rome, a smaller catafalque has replaced the large.

Meanwhile, white to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

3:16 isn’t just in John.

Right now, I’m still working through the fascinating…

No Apologies: Why Civilization Depends on the Strength of Men

US HERE – UK HERE

For example:

No apologies, then, for the masculine institutions of the past. Instead, we should question our refusing to grant to men and boys the opportunity or even the legal permission to form groups that are natural to them and that have proved to be so marvelously productive. I am not going to prescribe for every man and woman what groups they may or may not join. But what if something of that masculine conflict, that dynamic enmity, that sharpening of opponent against opponent and friend against friend, that bold affirmation of equality within hierarchy, and that readiness of equals to form and to submit to hierarchies is dissipated in the company of girls and women, so that the groups no longer accomplish all that they might? What if the sign on the tree house, No Girls Allowed, is not meant so much to keep girls away but to protect the male friendships from having to compete with eros—to attract the boys to male teams and to keep them in, ultimately for the good of the women that those same girls will become?

Think, think. Roman Catholics have abundant experience of what happened when girls were permitted to serve at the altar. The boys disappeared. Why? No doubt for a variety of coinciding reasons, most of which the boys themselves would have been hard put to describe. The camaraderie was spoiled. The older boys, instead of being rather like the first mate or the master-at-arms aboard a ship, instructing the smaller boys in what to do and how to do it, would now stick out and look absurd. The priests themselves lost interest in what had been the church’s most obvious source of vocations to the priesthood. What the servers were expected to do was less and less, till finally in many a parish they are little more than cute decorations in pajamas. Nobody, not even the women who pressed for altar girls, thinks of them as essential, or as soldiers of Christ in training. It is not just that boys find it repugnant to be decorative, to be observed as being pretty. It is that the whole deal ceases to be inspiring or interesting. Thus do boys largely accept the sexual indifference that their elders preach to them, but they behave as anyone with any knowledge of the creature would have predicted. They may indeed say that there should be women priests. They will say so as they stay home on Sunday, playing video games.

Esolen, Anthony. No Apologies: Why Civilization Depends on the Strength of Men (p. 88). Regnery Gateway. Kindle Edition.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
10 Comments