Rome Shot 270

Happy Birthday to the Queen of Heaven!

HVMANI GENERIS SATOR ET QVI PARCERE LAPSIS
INSTITVIS MACVLAS VETERIS RUBIGINIS AVFER
ARGENTO THALAMVS TIBI SIT QVO VIRGO REFVLGENS.

Don’t forget prayers to St. Anne for the overturning of Traditionis custodes by divine interventions or by whatever means Heaven’s graces and human grit can manage. Meanwhile, may God soften the hearts of those who will interpret this cruel and unnecessary document.

Posted in Our Solitary Boast | Tagged
3 Comments

VALLI: What’s the mood like in the Vatican these days? And about Francis and ‘Traditionis custodes’

Long time vaticanista Aldo Maria Valli gave an interview about all things Francesco/Bergoglio. He talks about the rumors concerning Francis’s health, a conclave, the scandal of Becciu, synods (“walking together”), Hungary and Orban.

Valli’s most telling comments were about the ethos of Rome and about Traditionis custodes. Concerning the former, I felt this the last few times I was there.

What atmosphere do you really breathe in the Vatican these days?  [What’s the mood like?]

“The feeling of temporariness (provvisorietà) and insecurity is palpable. This is accompanied by a climate of tension and suspicion, for fear of being subjected to purges and retaliation »

Retaliation? Really?

“In the recent case of the motu proprio which effectively abolishes Summorum Pontificum, the bishops have been clearly told that if they do not align they will be removed without too many compliments.”

About the cruel Motu Proprio TC with my zisk:

Meanwhile, as you recalled, the Pontiff made sure to prepare the ground for the suppression of the Latin Mass. Why launch this war?

“Because it is precisely by unleashing a war and provoking dissensions and protests that Bergoglio can demonstrate that the Tridentine Mass is ‘divisive'”.  [Jesuits are famous for their general lack of liturgical knowledge and interest.  TC must come from that, surely.  However, it is also useful because it caused a distraction from something else.  I think it will backfire.]

It is not so?

“With a wise and generous application of Benedict XVI’s previous motu proprio Summorum Pontificum, communities linked to the ancient rite have never found themselves in conflict with other faithful and priests”. [Do you see the key word there?  “Faithful” and priests. Conflicts might arise with priest and “faithful” who are not faithful.]

Does Francesco want to fuel a conflict that did not exist?

“Arousing the casus belli is typical of Francis’ Peronist [!] mentality: first he provokes the exasperated reaction of those he wants to hit, and then in the face of their protest he shows himself authoritarian and despotic and accuses them of disobedience”.

Isn’t it paradoxical that the apostolic letter, which practically tried to eliminate the ancient rite, is called Traditionis custodes?

“Francis, citing the Council, defines bishops as “guardians of Tradition” precisely when he forces them to abolish their main expression, which is the liturgical one. Anyone who sees this as a sort of mockery is not completely wrong ».

Precisely.

“It is painful that someone who is called “Holy Father” shows himself so cruel to his children, and so tolerant with those who are declared enemies of Christ, the Church and the Pope”.

I remind the readership of the post I made about the four “lynch” (an appropriate word) pins of Francis’ reign.

Francis’ Four Postulates from his programmatic encyclical “Evangelii gaudium”

This includes a description of Caudillismo – a quintessentially Argentinian socio-political phenomonon of a “strong man”, the most famous of whom have been Juan Manuel de Rosas (1793– 1877) – from whose writing Francis drew his “Four Postulates” – and, of course, Juan Peròn (+1974).

Please go review that post.  It is really useful.

ACTION ITEM! Be a “Custos Traditionis”! Join an association of prayer for the reversal of “Traditionis custodes”.

Posted in Francis, Pò sì jiù, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Traditionis custodes | Tagged , ,
17 Comments

Rome Shot 269

Photo by The Great Roman™

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on Rome Shot 269

6 Sept: St. Zechariah, Old Testament Prophet

Today is the feast of St. Zachariah, the prophet of the Old Testament. Here is the entry in the Martyrologium Romanum with a translation.

1. Commemoratio sancti Zachariae, prophetae, qui populum de exsilio in terra promissionis reversurum prophetavit eique regis pacifici nuntium attulit, quod Christus Dominus triumphali suo ingressu in Sanctam Civitatem Ierusalem mire implevit.

The commemoration of Saint Zechariah, the prophet, who prophesied that the people would return from exile into the land of promise, and announced the news of the King of Peace to it (the people), which Christ the Lord fulfilled with His triumphal entrance into the holy city of Jerusalem.

And now for the patristiblogger angle: the Fathers commentary on the Book of Zechariah. Here is St. Augustine on Zechariah 5 (about the vision of the flying scroll and the woman in the Ephah).

Augustine deals with false oaths in a letter to his good friend Alypius, by this time the bishop of his home town of Thagaste (ep. 125):

As to the suggestion you [Alypius] made in your letter that we should examine together the nature of an oath extorted by force, I beg of you, do not let our discussion turn crystal-clear matters into murky ones. If a servant of God were threatened with certain death, so that he should swear to do something forbidden and wicked, he still ought rather to die than to swear, so as not to commit a crime in fulfilling his oath. But in this case, … it was only the persistent shouting of the people that was forcing the man not to any crime but to what could be lawfully done, if it were done. And… the only thing to fear was that a few violent men, mingled with a crowd of mostly good ones, might seize the occasion to start a riot, under pretense of virtuous indignation, and might break out into some accursed disturbance to satisfy their passion for robbery. And when even this fear was unfounded, who would think that perjury could be committed even to avoid certain death, much less loss or some kind of physical injury? That individual called Regulus had never heard what the holy Scriptures say about the wrongfulness of a false oath. He had learned nothing about the sickle of Zechariah, and obviously he had not sworn to the Carthaginians by the sacraments of Christ but by the filthiness of demons. Yet he did not so fear certain torture and a horrible sort of death as to take his oath under compulsion, but he went to meet them to avoid perjuring himself, because he had sworn an oath of his own free will.

I wonder if this reminds anyone of any current events.

Posted in Patristiblogging, Saints: Stories & Symbols |
1 Comment

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 15th Sunday after Pentecost (23rd Ordinary – N.O.)

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at the Mass for your Sunday (obligation or none), either live or on the internet? Let us know what it was.

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

What was attendance like?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I was getting reports that it was way up.  But now COVID… again….  Tell me it doesn’t have a demonic component.

Was the Motu Proprio mentioned?  Any local changes or news?

For those of you who regularly viewed my live-streamed daily Masses – with their fervorini – for over a year, you might drop me a line.

I have some remarks about the TLM – HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
12 Comments

Rome Shot 268

Use your phone’s camera

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
5 Comments

WDTPRS – 23rd Ordinary Sunday (N.O.): Our perfectly amazing adoption

roman sarcophagus man sonThe Collect for the 23rd Ordinary Sunday – this Sunday – was not in any pre-Conciliar edition of the Roman Missal, but it was in the 8th century Gelasian Sacramentary in a section for evening prayers during Paschaltide.  You have to wonder how they – the cutting and pasting experts – made these decisions.  Right?

Deus, per quem nobis et redemptio venit et praestatur adoptio, filios dilectionis tuae benignus intende, ut in Christo credentibus et vera tribuatur libertas, et hereditas aeterna.

Take note of the lovely chiasms (so-called because, stylistically, they form a X or Greek chi): redemptio venit…praestatur adoptio (subject verb… verb subject) and also vera libertas…hereditas aeterna (adjective noun…noun adjective).  And the two passives make a nice bridge.  It is brilliantly crafted and typically terse, according to the Roman genius.

chiasmus

Vocabulary connections suggest to me Patristic sources for this prayer (e.g., in St Hilary of Poitiers (+ c. 368) de trin 6, 44; St Ambrose of Milan (+ 397) ep 9, 65, 5).

Praesto, -iti, -atum means effectively “to stand before or in front”.   It has a wide range of meanings, however, including “to fulfill, discharge, maintain, perform, execute” and concepts surrounding the same, making praesto a little confusing.  The lexicographer Souter says that in about the 2nd century praesto meant, “lend” (like French “prêter”) and from the 4th century onward “offer”.  Cassiodorus (+ c. 583) and other authors use praesto for “help, aid, give”.   A. Blaise suggests the French “accorder” when praesto concerns God.  Some weeks ago, (19th Sunday) we saw adoptioHereditas can be, “heirship” or the inheritance, the patrimony, itself.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

God our Father, you redeem us, and make us your children in Christ. Look upon us, give us true freedom and bring us to the inheritance you promised.

BTW.. in all the years that I wrote these columns, I constantly reminded people that the slavishly literal versions I provided week in and week out were intended to help you see how the Latin works, to get the bones of the prayers, for the sake of comparing and contrasting more easily the official translations..  They were never intended to be liturgically ready versions… even though they were often better than what we got!  So, keep that in mind.  They are workhorses, merely.

SUPER LITERAL RENDERING:

O God, through whom to us come both redemption and adoption is guaranteed, kindly give attention to your beloved children, so that both true freedom and the inheritance everlasting may be bestowed on those believing in Christ.

See what I did in there?

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

O God, by whom we are redeemed and receive adoption, look graciously upon your beloved sons and daughters, that those who believe in Christ may receive true freedom and an everlasting inheritance.

What do you think?

By the fact of our unity with Christ in His and our common human nature, the way to divine sonship was opened up to us by the Father in Christ.

Christ is the Father’s Son by nature, we are sons and daughters by grace.

Our adoption through grace is “perfect” (adoptio perfecta) because it complete. Perfecta is from perficio, “bring to an end or conclusion, finish, complete”.

From God’s point of view our adoption is perfect because He puts His mark upon us, especially in baptism and confirmation.  Since God is not limited by time and for Him there are no past or future distinct from the present, He sees in perfection the results of every gift of adoption.

From our point of view adoption will only be completed when we see Him face to face.  Because of baptism the Father’s mark is sealed into us forever.  In this marvelous adoption the Holy Spirit brings the Father and Son to us when He takes up His rightful place in our souls, thus creating the perfect communion, even family, within our souls.

Today’s Collect has its foundation certainly in the New Testament imagery of adoption, but I think it also flows out of ancient Roman legal concepts of manumission and adoption, freeing of slaves and adoption of heirs.

Ancient prayers rang differently in the ancient ears than they do in ours.  Trying to get the content that rang then to ring also today is tricky.  Sometimes it can’t be done, and still retain the prayer’s concision, a characteristic of the Roman style.

Let’s bang our hammer on the bell that is “adoption” for a while and see what rings out.

Our adoption by God takes us out of slavery and gives us a new status as free members of the Church and as sons and daughters.  Baptism confers this freedom, membership, and adoption.

Even natural children of a father in ancient Rome required the father’s recognition (Latin recognitio) before they were legally considered to be his legitimate children and heirs with any rights.  Adoption could grant those same rights and privileges.  Roman adoptio removed a person from one familia and put him in another, while adrogatio legally placed people not under the power of a parent into a familia, thus placing them under the authority of the paterfamilias.  In Latin, a familia is a house and all belonging to it, a family estate, family property, fortune.  A familia had a head, the paterfamilias (or –familiae, the –as being a Greek genitive), the master of the house.

The baptized are no longer subject to Satan and destined for hell, but are now under new mastership of God.

In Rome there was also an “adoption”, being named an heir with the right of taking the name of the one bequeathing the patrimony.  However, this was not an adoption in the fullest sense: you became heir of the father’s name and property without the other powers of a paterfamilias until they were confirmed by magistrates, etc.

Even after baptism our state can be deepened through confirmation.

Ancient slaves could be freed, but that did not make them Roman citizens with the greater rights.  By baptism, we become citizens of heaven, members of the family of the Church.  Not only are we free, but we gain even the chance of eternal salvation.

In ancient Rome a slave could become a citizen through certain types of manumission, by adoption, through military service, or a special grant to a community or territory.  In a way, we have undergone all of these: by laying His hand on us (manus “hand” and mittere), we have been freed.  We have been made sons and daughters of a heavenly Father.

We are now soldiers in the Church militant.

By membership of the society of the Church, a holy and priestly People, we gain privileges and obligations.   God has recognized us as His own children with a perfect adoption.  This is true freedom and true heirship, excluding nothing and, in some sense, lavishing on us even more than we might have had before we fell under the Devil’s dominion through sin.

This is a difficult mystery to grasp: we are already sons and daughters in a perfect sonship by adoption, but that sonship is not yet complete: we lack the final essential component, that is, perseverance in faith and obedience for the whole course of our lives and their ratification in death and our particular judgment.

It is through many trials that we come to the perfection of adoption which we now share in an imperfectly perfect way.

These collects during the summer, during Ordinary time, contain reminders of who we are and, therefore, what we are to do.

Christ reveals both.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, WDTPRS |
Comments Off on WDTPRS – 23rd Ordinary Sunday (N.O.): Our perfectly amazing adoption

Rome Shot 267

Photo by The Great Roman™

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Rome Shot 266

Photo by The Great Roman™

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

ASK FATHER: Good sources for chapel veils, mantillas

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father – back in 2009, you posted asking for help finding high-quality chapel veils.  Most, if not all of the suggested businesses listed in the answers are closed up, (sad).  Could you post the question again, as I imagine there are new veil-making businesses popping up all the time now with the resurgence of the TLM (happy!).

This is a good question!  Anyone?

Now that the TLM will be under attack or suppressed in some places, I had a little moment of Schadenfreude, picturing the consternation of lib priests and bishops as more and more women started wearing chapel veils and saying the Rosary (the usual accusation) in their Novus Ordo Masses.

¡Hagan lío!

BTW… we should explore St. Paul on the veiling of women’s hair sometime.  There are some pretty deep elements.

 

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
36 Comments