Wile E., eat your heart out

In a far cry from what Wile E. Coyote does does either in the venerable short flicks or in the pages of the Fishwrap when attempting commentary on can. 915…

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

… a couple of Marine Majors and tech guys solved a problem by strapping an anti-ship Naval Strike Missile onto a modified unmanned joint light tactical vehicle and – from the land – hitting a target at sea. This gives the Marines a way to deny enemies “the use of key maritime terrain”. In other words, they have another way to take out vessels coming ashore and staying off shore in support.

There is a really interesting article about this in Marine Times.

And this was a good opportunity to mentioned Wile E.’s recent ACME experience!

Posted in Going Ballistic, Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
6 Comments

30 April (N.O.) – St Pius V – A Pope who dealt with clerical depravity

Today in the Novus Ordo calendar is the Feast of St. Pius V, a great Pope, at the time of the important Battle of Lepanto.

Some years ago I made a podcast about Pius V and his bull Quo primum.  HERE

Here’s another great thing about Pius V, whose body is in St Mary Major’s Sistine Chapel in Rome.

Confronted with clerical depravity in Rome, Pius V did not say, “Who am I to judge?” On 30 August 1568 Pius V issued the bull Horrendum illud scelus.


Horrendum illud scelus, quo pollutae foedataeque Civitates a tremendo Dei iudicio conflagrarunt, acerbissimum Nobis dolorem inurit, graviterque animum nostrum commovet, ut ad illud, quantum potest, comprimendum, studia nostra conferamus.   That horrible crime, by which corrupt and obscene cities were destroyed by fire through divine condemnation, [hence, “sodomy”] causes us most bitter sorrow and shocks our mind, impelling us to repress such a crime with the greatest possible zeal.
§ 1. Sane Lateranensi Concilio dignoscitur constitutum, ut quicumque Clerici, illa incontinentia, quae contra naturam est, propter quam ira Dei venit in filios diffidentiae, deprehensi fuerint laborare, a Clero deiiciantur,
vel ad agendam in Monasteriis poenitentiam detrudantur.
  § 1. Quite opportunely the Fifth Lateran Council [1512-1517] issued this decree: “Let any member of the clergy caught in that vice against nature, given that the wrath of God falls over the sons of perfidy, be removed from the clerical order or forced to do penance in a monastery” (chap. 4, X, V, 31).
§ 2. Verum ne tanti flagitii contagium, impunitatis spe, quae maxima peccandi illecebra est, fidentius invalescat, Clericos huius nefarii criminis reos, gravius ulciscendos deliberavimus, ut qui animae interitum non hor­rescunt, hos certe deterreat civilium legum vindex gladius saecularis.   § 2. So that the contagion of such a grave offense may not advance with greater audacity by taking advantage of impunity, which is the greatest incitement to sin, and so as to more severely punish the clerics who are guilty of this nefarious crime and who are not frightened by the death of their souls, we determine that they should be handed over to the severity of the secular authority, which enforces civil law.
§ 3. ltaque quod Nos iam in ipso Pontificatus nostri principio hac de re decrevimus, plenius nunc, fortiusque persequi intendentes, omnes,  et quoscumque Presbyteros, et alios Clericos saeculares, et regulares, cuius­cumque gradus, et dignitatis, tam dirum nefas exercentes, omni privilegio clericali, omnique officio, dignitate, et beneficio Ecclesiastico praesentis cano­nis auctoritate privamus. Ita quod per ludicem Ecclesiasticum degradati, potestati statim saeculari tradantur, qui de eis illud idem capiat supplicium, quod in laicos hoc in exitio devolutos, legitimis reperitur sanctionibus con stitutum.   § 3. Therefore, wishing to pursue with greater rigor than we have exerted since the beginning of our pontificate, we establish that any priest or member of the clergy, either secular or regular, who commits such an execrable crime, by force of the present law be deprived of every clerical privilege, of every post, dignity and ecclesiastical benefit, and having been degraded by an ecclesiastical judge, let him be immediately delivered to the secular authority to be put to death, as mandated by law as the fitting punishment for laymen who have sunk into this abyss.    [Use your imagination and review the Rite of Degradation of a Priest or Bishop. After which the walking tragedy is handed over.]
Nulli ergo, etc.   Nothing to the contrary withstanding, etc.
[Bull. Rom., tom. 4, III, p. 33]    

NB: The Bull says “removed” OR “forced to do penance”.

And one wonders what the “civil” penalties were.

Having just read Fr. Longenecker’s latest comment about the new “woke” heresy of antinomianism, Pius’ strong action against this rot in the clergy should be taken to heart by bishops today.   

Pope Saint Pius gives us an example of the medicinal power of law.

St. Pius V, pray for us. Pray for our bishops. Pray for religious superiors.

PRAY FOR US!

____

I wonder what he’d say about certain roving Jesuits today.

Posted in Linking Back, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 143

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 142

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

Fishwrap’s Wile E. Coyote

At Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter) Michael Sean Winters (aka Madame Defarge aka the Wile E. Coyote of the catholic Left – coined by Robby George, I think), who in the past regularly wished physical and financial harm on those with whom he disagrees, took exception to comments made at a conference Villanova University Law School: “Taking Measure of the ‘Biden Effect’: American Catholics and the President”. Inevitably, the issue of Biden and Holy Communion came up.

Wile E. took exception and leapt upon his newest ACME contraption to launch his explanation of canon law, in particular can. 915, which requires that Communion be withheld from Catholic who persist in manifest grave sin.  Canonist Ed Peters explains can. 915 HERE.   But never mind what someone like Ed Peters says.  Like everyone on that side of the increasingly yawning chasm, Winters requires that you not believe the plain text of the canon, just as you must, at their command, admit that up is down and black is white and that 2+2=catfish.

[…]

Finally, Fr. Gerald Murray, a regular on “The World Over with Raymond Arroyo,” reiterated his stance that Biden should be denied Communion, as he affirmed immediately before the election. Murray consistently holds that the law of the church is as clear as day. I note in passing that Murray’s own bishop, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, indicated during the campaign that he would not deny Biden Communion based on his political stances. Is Murray now the archbishop of New York?

Still, the question must be faced: Is the canon law of the church open to a variety of interpretations on this point? Canon 915 states: “Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.” What is ambiguous about that?

The problem — and it is a frightening one — is that these three speakers do not seem to understand what canon law is. The canon law of the Catholic Church is modeled on Roman law. In the United States — and most Anglophone countries — we grow up in a common law tradition. If you confuse the one with the other, you get this doctrinaire, and Jansenistic, understanding of the Catholic faith. It is not like confusing an apple with an orange. It is like confusing an apple with an orangutan.

[…]

Wile E. goes on to build his ACME contraption by citing several other characters in his world, including his old pastor, explaining that “the laws of the church are the stars to guide you”,

He cites Nicholas Cafardi: “Canon law is aspirational… It is a law which sets goals to be achieved, but admits of privileges (private laws) and dispensations along the way. American civil law is not aspirational; it is normative. It sets standards that are in general invariable.”

M. Cathleen Kaveny: “Those norms need to be prudently applied in each case, taking account of the overall purpose of the law and key principles that run throughout, as well as specific facts and circumstances. It runs in the opposite direction from the Anglo-American common law tradition, which builds up to general principles from definitive results rendered in each case.”

And even Fr. Lou Cameli writing at Jesuit-run Amerika.  You will recall how Cameli, in an attempt to make Amoris laetitiae not mean what it clearly meant regarding Communion for the divorced and remarried (which is manifest grave sin in nearly all circumstances), shamelessly bowdlerized the famous Gaudet Mater Ecclesiae address at the opening of Vatican II.  HERE   What, of Cameli’s astonishing work, does Wile E. cite?  A justification Communion for couples in a sodomitical “marriage”.  As Cameli says, “Are two people in a same-sex marriage or union in an objectively sinful situation? Not necessarily.”  And, after all, what is scandalous these days?  Let’s be fair.

Winters/Wile E. also plays his old “JANSENISM!” card, a common tactic for him.  HERE

Thus, Wile E. has totally demolished his opponents with his brilliant ACME contraption. His conclusion is that can. 915, indeed all the Canon Law that he doesn’t like, doesn’t need to be followed, in fact, shouldn’t be because, after all, Canon Law follows the Roman Law tradition, not Common Law, and it is therefore nuanced to the point of non-compliance.  After all… JANSENISM!

Ridiculous.   Winter’s entire piece is a feeble attempt to justify his own position, not any sort of coherent application of Canon Law.

Winters seems to know that Canon Law admits of personal privileges, dispensations, pastoral exceptions and the like. Well and good. Dispensations need to be requested.  People are not dispensed because they want to be.  Perhaps Mr. Biden would like to apply for a dispensation from Archbp. Gregory.  I can see it now:

“I admit that I willingly and completely support the right of a mother and her doctor to murder an innocent child. I actively work against the Church’s teaching on the inestimable value of human life from the moment of conception to natural death, but – C’mon man!  – I still want to get ‘that host thing’ from Father on Sunday.  Oh, and I officiated at the pretend wedding of two dudes. Bite me.”

Winters cited his pastor, whom I am sure was or is a charming guy. One imagines him taking a pull on his meerschaum pipe, blowing a smoke ring to linger in the rarified air of the rectory parlor.  “You see, Wile E., the laws of the church are the stars to guide you, not a stop sign that requires you to come to a complete stop.” Those present smile wryly with little Ivy League wannabe chuckles and knowing nods.

Fine. Let’s say canons are stars.

Canon 915 is about – as can. 1752 reminds us that all the canons are about – the salvation of souls.

How, exactly please, is Mr. Biden’s soul saved by allowing him to continue to think that his depraved, public, and unambiguous support for the slaughter of innocent children is merely a harmless policy preference?

When Mr. Biden faces the Judgement Seat of the God who created him and who cannot be deceived, and faces those slaughtered children, and says, “But the bishops and the priests of Your Church said there was nothing wrong with what I did!” God may, perhaps, have mercy on him.  However, I think it far more likely that God would know that Mr. Biden had received ample warning during his earthly life about the evil positions he openly , persistently embraced and strove to advance for years.

And WOE! to those bishops and priests who allowed him to think his actions were moral.

If Canon Law is akin to the stars that guide you, then should be followed towards salvation, towards Christ, towards moral choices.

If the stars are, on the contrary, guiding you to depraved indifference to human life and basic morality, you might just be looking at the star charts upside down.

We must pray for these confused people, whose souls are in grave peril.  We do not desire the eternal damnation of any person, no matter how depraved.  We desire their conversion.  Mighty conversions do take place, often through the intercessory prayer of others at a contributing factor.    Think of what an incredible moment it would be to have a sudden and complete reversal of “policy” from these people, along with an open and public statement of regret for the harm done.

Posted in Canon Law, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged , , , ,
11 Comments

29 April: St. Peter Martyr, Patron of Inquisitors & blessing Holy Water in honor of

In the Church’s traditional calendar today we celebrate St. Peter the Martyr, also known as Peter of Verona.

St. Peter Martyr was a Dominican who preached against the Cathars around Milan.  He was so effective that the Cathars hired an assassin who in 1252 killed Peter with an axe or large blade to the head.   When he was struck in the head, Peter dipped his fingers in his own blood and wrote “Credo in Deum” on the ground as he recited the Apostles Creed before dying.  His assassin converted and is now venerated as a Blessed.  Peter himself was canonized with blinding speed the very next year by Innocent IV (Fieschi).

Peter was also an effective inquisitor.  He was known to be a clement judge for those who confessed their sins and crimes.   Hence, Peter Martyr is the patron saint of inquisitors.

He id depicted in a Dominican habit with a big blade sticking out of his head.   He is, therefore, also invoked against headaches.  Bl. Idelfonso Schuster, once Archbishop of Milan and a great Benedictine liturgist wrote a prayer for headaches.  Since I know some people who suffer from migraines, here it is:

O God, who did grant to your Blessed Priest and Martyr Peter the grace to write with his blood that Symbol of the Faith which, after he had diligently learned it as a child, and then become a Preacher of your Gospel, he preached undaunted to the people against the errors of the heretics; through his prayers grant that Your Church might preach the Faith and confirm it in good works. Through Christ our Lord.

We should probably bring back the Inquisition, by the way.  The Inquisition is poorly understood and many lies and black false legends hem it in.

Here is something you might not know.

There are two special blessings in honor of St. Peter the Martyr, one for Holy Water – on any day – using a relic of St. Peter Martyr and one on his feast day for palms and other branches.  They are both in the Rituale Romanum, assumed from the Dominicans books. Any priest can use these now. I found a translation at NLM.

Here is the blessing of water.

V. Our help is in the name of the Lord.
R. Who made heaven and earth.
V. The Lord be with you.
R. And with your spirit.

Let us pray. O God, who for the salvation of the human race did institute the greatest mysteries in the substance of water, mercifully be present to our invocations, and pour forth upon this element of water Thy bless+ing, which we seal by the power of the blessed Peter, Thy Martyr; so that though his intercession, it may be a salutary remedy for your faithful, driving out evil spirits from them, and warding off illnesses and infirmities of body and spirit; and grant that all who drink of it or are sprinkled with it may be delivered from every adversity of body and soul, and regain health in their whole being. Through Christ our Lord. R. Amen.

Let us pray. Almighty everlasting God, we humbly implore Thy boundless clemency, that Thou may deign to bless + by Thy indescribable power these Thy faithful people, who devoutly come to (venerate) the relics of the blessed Martyr Peter, and ask for his prayers; so that by his intercession, delivered from every ailment of mind and body, protected here and everywhere by Thy mercy, and saved by Thy grace, they may merit, after the course of this way and life, to come unto eternal joy. Through Christ our Lord.

There are also blessings of Holy Water in honor of other saints, such as Sts. Vincent Ferrer, Albert the Carmeltite, Ignatius of the Jesuits, Vincent de Paul and Raymond Nonnatus, the Mercedarian.

The prayer for Holy Water in honor of St. Petery Martyr mentions, as do other blessing prayers for water, the driving out of demons.

At the Art Institute in Chicago there is a medieval series of the life of St. Peter.  He is sprinkling Holy Water and driving out a demon.

Hence, if any of your parishes have a relic of St. Peter Martyr, you might have some Holy Water blessed with it.  Remember, the blessings in force in 1962 with the Rituale Romanum must be done in Latin or else, as the Rituale itself says, they do nothing.  No… really.  (Cf. Title VIII, Ch. 1, no. 2: Benedictiones sive constitutivae sive invocativae invalidae sunt, si adhibita non fuerit formula ab Ecclesia praescripta.)

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Saints: Stories & Symbols, Save The Liturgy - Save The World |
2 Comments

St. Catherine of Siena wrote that GOD says that same-sex acts are so appalling that demons who incite them won’t stick around as they are taking place

According to the Novus Ordo calendar today is the Feast of St. Catherine of Siena, Virgin, Doctrix of the Church, and Patroness of Europe and of Italy.  Her body rests in the beautiful Dominican church in Rome, Santa Maria sopra Minerva.  Nearby, in what is now a cultural center for things Roman, across from the French seminary’s chapel, is a palazzo in which you find the room where the saint died.  It was one of my “Daily Rome Shots”.

To honor the saint, I will repost here something I posted not too long ago.

In her Dialogues (ch 124), St. Catherine’s conversations with God, the Doctrix of the Church writes that the Enemy, demons, incite people to unnatural sins (homosexual acts) but that they don’t stick around to see it happen, because those acts  are too repulsive even for them.

Those acts are so contrary to nature that they offend their angelic intellect, even though they are fallen and apostate.   They want the sin to take place and they incite it, but it is so offensive to them that they absent themselves when it is happening.

Here she describes demons inciting men to these acts.  GOD is talking at this point…. also about PRIESTS.

Io ti fo a sapere, carissima figliuola, che tanta purità richieggio a voi e a loro in questo sacramento, quanta è possibile a uomo in questa vita; in quanto dalla parte vostra e loro ve ne dovete ingiegniare d’aquistarla continuamente. Voi dovete pensare che, se possibile fusse che la natura angelica si purificasse, a questo misterio sarebbe bisogno che ella si purificasse; ma non è possibile, perché non à bisogno d’essere purificata, perché in loro non può cadere veleno di peccato. Questo ti dico perché tu vegga quanta purità Io richieggio da voi e da loro in questo sacramento, e singularmente da loro. Ma il contrario mi fanno, però che tutti immondi, e non tanto della immondizia e fragilità alla quale sete inchinevoli naturalmente (118v) per fragile natura vostra – bene che la ragione, quando il libero arbitrio vuole, fa stare queta la sua rebellione – ma i miseri, non tanto che raffrenino questa fragilità, ma essi fanno peggio, commettendo quello maladetto peccato contra natura. E come ciechi e stolti, offuscato il lume de l’intelletto loro, non cognoscono la puzza e la miseria nella quale essi sono: che non tanto che ella puta a me che so’ somma eterna purità – ed èmmi tanto abominevole che per questo solo peccato profondaro cinque città (Gn 19,24-25Sg 10,6) per divino mio giudicio, non volendo più sostenere la divina mia giustizia, tanto mi dispiacque, questo abominevole peccato – ma non tanto a me, come detto t’ò, ma alle dimonia, le quali dimonia i miseri s’ànno fatti signori, lo’ dispiace. Non che lo’ dispiaccia il male perché lo’ piaccia alcuno bene, ma perché la natura loro fu natura angelica, e però quella natura schifa di non vedere né di stare a vedere commettere quello enorme peccato attualmente. Àgli bene inanzi gittata la saetta avelenata del veleno della concupiscenzia, ma giognendo a l’atto del peccato egli si va via, per la cagione e per lo modo che detto t’ò.

“I wish thee to know, dearest daughter, that I require in this Sacrament from you and from them as great purity as it is possible for man [PRIESTS] to have in this life. On your side you ought to endeavour to acquire it continually. You should think that were it possible that the angelic nature should be purified, such purification would be necessary with regard to this mystery, but this is not possible, for angels need no purification, since the poison of sin cannot infect them. I say this to thee in order that thou mayest see how great a purity I require from you and from them in this Sacrament, and particularly from them. But they act in a contrary way, for they come full of impurity to this mystery, and not only of that impurity to which, through the fragility of your weak nature, you are all naturally inclined (although reason when free-will permits, can quiet the rebellion of nature), but these wretches not only do not bridle this fragility, but do worse, committing that accursed sin against nature, and as blind and fools with the light of their intellect darkened, they do not know the stench and misery in which they are. It is not only that this sin stinks before Me, Who am the Supreme and Eternal Truth, it does indeed displease Me so much and I hold it in such abomination that for it alone I buried five cities by a Divine judgment, My Divine justice being no longer able to endure it. This sin not only displeases Me as I have said, [NB:] but also the devils whom these wretches have made their masters. Not that the evil displeases them because they like anything good, but because their nature was originally angelic, and their angelic nature causes them to loathe the sight of the actual commission of this enormous sin. They truly enough hurl the arrow poisoned with the venom of concupiscence, but when their victim proceeds to the actual commission of the sin, they depart for the reason and in the manner that I have said. Thou rememberest that I manifested to thee before the plague how displeasing this sin was to Me, and how deeply the world was corrupted by it; so I lifted thee with holy desire and elevation of mind above thyself, and showed thee the whole world and, as it were, the nations thereof, and thou sawest this terrible sin and the devils fleeing as I have told thee, and thou rememberest that so great was the pain that thou didst receive, and the stench of this sin, that thou didst seem to thyself to see no refuge on this side of death, in which thou and My other servants could hide so as not to be attacked by this leprosy. Thou didst see that thou couldest not remain among men, for neither small nor great, nor old nor young, nor clerics nor religious, nor prelates, nor lords, nor subjects, were uncontaminated in body or mind by this curse.

St. Catherine makes it pretty clear what God thinks of sodomy and all the other unnatural acts that fall into that fell category.   So hideous, so offensive are those sins that even demons who provoke them won’t stick around while they are being committed.  Demons can, however, and will, stick around the places where those acts were committed.

This is clear, charitable talk.  It is not the vague and slippery lulling of certain homosexualist activists who are so very popular with those who have given into the wisdom of the world.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged ,
6 Comments

28 April – Prepared to be amazed! – St. Gianna Molla’s 2nd miracle. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Today is the Dies Natalis of St. Gianna Beretta Molla (+28 April 1962 at 39 years of age).

That is to say that St. Gianna died and was born into heaven today (thus, “birthday… dies natalis”).

I have posted this before, but it seemed appropriate to repost it today.

St. Gianna is one of the saints of our time whom I would very much like to see officially included in an updated version of the traditional Roman calendar.  As a matter of fact, according to Cum sanctissima we are able to observe her day at the altar now.

What follows is about the 2nd miracle through the intercession of St. Gianna, which lead to her canonization.

A person who cause for canonization has been officially advanced is called a “Servant of God”.  If they are determined to have died while living a life of “heroic virtue” they are declared “Venerable”.  After that, if a miracle is authenticated by their intercession, they are beatified and called “Blessed”.  After another miracle they are canonized and called “Saint”.

St. Gianna was canonized as someone who evidenced “heroic virtue”.  Since then, however, a category or path to canonization has emerged between the “life of heroic virtue” and “martyrdom”.  That middle path is called “oblatio vitae” or “offering of life”.   The idea is this.   Some people who live holy lives, though not necessarily a life of heroic virtue, nevertheless make decisions which lead to their great harm and death for the sake of the Faith or some virtue integral to the Faith.  Take the case of St. Maximillian Kolbe.  He was beatified as having lived a life of heroic virtue but canonized as a martyr.  In fact it may be that he was not actually killed by the Nazi’s because of the Faith, or his priesthood: he offered to take the place of another prisoner.   His choice led to his death.  He offered his life, though it may not have been martyrdom.

Fr. Vincent Capodanno, the heroic Navy Chaplain killed in Vietnam while trying to give last rites to a wounded Marine.  Yut!  He wasn’t killed for hatred of the Faith, so he wasn’t a martyr.  It would not be necessary to demonstrate that “chaps” lives all the virtues in a heroic way.  NB: “heroic” here has nothing to do with his heroism in the fire fight during which he was killed.  For the sake of another, he made a choice to put himself in the line of fire and was killed because of it.  That was truly heroic in earthly, but he did it for a spiritual motive, love of neighbor, concern for a soul.

The case of St. Gianna is in some respects similar.  She lived a virtuous life and her cause was argued that she lived a life of heroic virtue.  However, had they not made that case, she did, in fact, make a choice that led to her death for the sake of her unborn child, an oblatio vitae.  She was aware that her choice would lead to her death and she chose it anyway for the sake of her child’s life.

Ancient spiritual writers, such as St. Gregory the Great (+604), wrestled with categories of martyrdom.  Red, or bloody martyrdom is rather straight forward, provided it can be proven that the murderers killed the martyr for hatred of the Faith, etc.

However, there is also a long tradition of identifying “white” martyrdom, coined by St. Jerome, whereby a person gives witness through an ascetic life, withdrawal from the world, pilgrimages involving great sacrifice, or who suffers greatly for the Faith but who does not die in bearing witness. There is also a “blue” or “green” martyrdom, involving great penance and mortifications without necessarily the sort of withdrawal from life that a hermit or a cenobite might live.

Gregory the Great in his Dialogues, writes of different kinds of martyrdom, bloody, public martyrdom in time of persecution and secret martyrdom, not in time of persecution.  He wrote that secret martyrs are no less worthy of honor, because they also endured sufferings and the attacks of hidden enemies, but they persevered in charity.

As I mentioned above, St. Gianna’s path was not that of martyrdom.  They made a case for heroic virtue.  By the newly opened path, she more than likely would have been a candidate for beatification by oblatio vitae.

These days, under normal circumstances, two miracles are needed for canonization on the path of heroic virtue, one for beatification and one for canonization.  Sometimes that can be waived by the Sovereign Pontiff.

The account of the 2nd miracle for the canonization of St. Gianna gives me shivers.  Sometimes we don’t get many details about what these miracles are all about.  We know quite a bit about this miracle.

This is adapted from my original post a few years back when I was speaking and thinking mostly in Italian, and the sources were in Italian, so it might sound odd here and there. My post from many years ago – with touch ups here and there – continues, thusly:


Some time ago I did over 100 hours of training at the Congregation for Causes of Saints concerning the history, theology and juridical dimensions of causes of beatification and canonization (investigating the life, heroic virtues, martyrdom, reputation of holiness, reputation of martyrdom, miracles, etc.).  Such training isn’t just for me: it has to be for the whole Church or it is worth only the cost of the parchment.

We had the chance to learn from and question the officials of the Congregation, the experts who collaborate with it, and the physicians and historians who are experts consultants. We had lectures from the Prefect, Secretary and Under-Secretary, the Promotor of the Faith (so-called “Devil’s Advocate” is a misnomer, really) and the Relator General. We had tours of the archives and attended the proceedings of the opening of a cause in the Roman phase. Abundant materials were provided and we were, naturally, allowed then to be thoroughly tested on them.

Going into the course I was not sure what to expect, but I brought a certain measure of skepticism about some things I had heard (mostly due to faulty and insufficient information, I see now). I heard stories of lives and of miracles which left me nearly with my jaw on the table as I listened and saw the documentation.

This was a privilege which for the rest of my priesthood will affect how I can help other people understand things about the life of grace in a way I could not before.

Ad ramos

Concerning the second of the two miracles worked by God through St. Gianna:

In mid November 1999 a Brazilian woman named Elisabete Comparini Arcolino discovered she was pregnant for the fourth time. An echogram on 30 Nov. showed that the developing child was within a small sac only .8 cm in length and 2.3 cm in diameter. The doctor said that it was doubtful that with such a beginning for the gestation that child would come to term. On 9 December a echo showed the embryo a 1.0 cm in length but also a huge increase in coagulation of blood (blood loss), measuring 5.2 x 3.5 cm. On 19 December they found the beating heart of the child, but also a deterioration of the placenta in the lower region of the uterus. A pessimistic prognosis was given. The doctor following the case, Dr. Nadia Bicego Vieitez de Almeida, who had handled Elisabete’s previous pregnancies, said that with the great loss of blood Elisebete would probably spontaneously abort or they would have to do the procedure sooner or later.

Contrary to expectations, the child’s heart kept beating and the pregnancy continued.

On 11 February 2000 Elisabete realized there was a serious problem and went to the hospital. The echo showed that the gestational sack’s membrane had broken at 16 weeks of gestation and, while the fetus was alive, there was now a total absence of amniotic fluid. The radiologist testified that there was no amniotic liquid to protect the child from exposure to the outside world and from the external pressure of the uterus itself. This meant that both the child and mother were in serious danger of infection, etc. Dr. Bicego recommended termination of the pregnancy. Elisabete was put on a regime of super hydration, 4 l. of phleboclysis (intravenous injection of an isotonic solution of dextrose or other substances) per day. On 15 Feb a new echo showed that there was no significant increase in the volume of amniotic fluid and the volume was insufficient to bring the pregnancy to term.

At this point, 15 Feb, the prognosis for the child was precisely zero. Two studies, one in Sao Paolo and one in San Francisco had looked at viability of pregnancies with a ruptured membrane at between 22-26 weeks, many more weeks after the case of Elisabete and her child. In the studies in every case examined every fetus was spontaneously aborted within 60 days of the rupture. In virtually all cases, a fetus of 16 weeks would abort with a few days.

Dr. Bicega and other doctors told Elisabete that they had to do an abortion to save her life, and gave her some time to make the decision. But Elisabete, as she testified, knew in her heart that she could not do that and that she must try to bring the child to term. When the doctor came for the decision, Elisabete’s husband Carlos Cesar requested that a priest come. He called the parish priest of San Sebastiano, Fr. Ovidio Jose Alves di Andrade. Dr. Bicega said she would return again in 15 minutes with the documents for their signature approving the abortion.

Present at the time Dr. Bicega came was a friend of Elisabete, named Isabel, who heard the exchange about the abortion. Isabel went to the hospital chapel to pray to Mary to help bring some clarity to the situation. There Isabel spent some time in prayer. When she was finished and got up to leave, she saw pass by the door the diocesan Bishop Diogenes Silva Matthes who had come to the hospital to visit another person. Bp. Silva had been celebrant of the wedding of Elisabete and Carlos Cesar at San Sebastiano where they worked as catechists. Isabel told the bishop what was going on and he went to Elisabete’s room and there learned the whole story. The bishop said, “Betinha, we will pray and God will help us” and he asked Dr. Bicega to wait a while longer. Then the bishop left.

Shortly after the bishop left Fr. Ovidio arrived. He began to give Elisabete the sacrament of anointing. At that point the bishop returned. He had brought with him a biography of Bl. Gianna Beretta Molla. He said to Elisabete: “Do what Blessed Gianna did, and, if necessary, give your life for the child. I was praying at home and I said to the Blessed in prayer, ‘Now has arrived the opportunity for you to be canonized. Intercede before the Lord for the grace of a miracle and save the life of this little child.”

The painting of St. Gianna over a side altar in the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in LaCrosse, WI. There is a 1st Class relic there.

Elisabete had known about Bl. Gianna and how she died and how the first miracle for her cause was for a woman who had terrible complications from a caesarian section. After knowing about Bl. Gianna, Elisabete herself, in her third pregnancy and after two previous caesarian sections, had decided to give birth normally despite the problems that entailed. At that time the same Bishop Silva had given her a holy card of Bl. Gianna. Elisabete was terribly afraid but she asked Bl. Gianna for help and gave birth to a child weighing over 5kg.

Therefore, this time, reinforced by past experience and the help of Bl. Gianna and the same bishop, Elisabete told Dr. Bicega she would try to carry the child to term, so long at the child’s heart continued to beat. Various doctors at the hospital expressed their opinion that this was madness. However, Dr. Bicega later testified about that time: “But I, I don’t know if it was by intuition, through my own lack of courage, or if I was drawn by Elisabete’s faith which seemed to have no limit, decided to wait and see what happened.” Elisabete would later testify that for her: “Jesus’ greatest miracle was to change the doctor’s heart. She had been unmovable in her determination to perform abortions, but one day she said to me, ‘Your faith had made me think a great deal. Even I have faith now and so let’s wait for the death of the fetus”.

Elisabete left the hospital and went to the home of Carlos Cesar’s aunt, Janete Arcolino, who was a nurse. Dr. Bicego lent them the sonar machine so that they could monitor the heart beat of the child and told them to check her temperature and blood pressure every six hours. They continued the super hydration treatments and eventually began a cortisone treatment to prevent problems with the child’s lungs.

In the meantime, Fr. Ovidio testified later, the whole community was continuing to invoke Bl. Gianna, continuously asking for a miracle. The parish had been very pro-life and every month there was special blessing for women who were with child. Also involved in the prayers to Bl. Gianna was a community of Carmelite sisters who in turn had communicated the request to other convents in Brazil. For her part, Elisabete had a very hard time of things. Despite her faith in God and her past experience, there were times when she was terribly afraid she was going to die with her child. She felt herself sometimes quite abandoned by God and alone. She was worried about what would happen with her other three children if she died.

Dr. Bicega followed the pregnancy closely and noted that during the whole time there was no accumulation of amniotic fluid. If Elisabete gained any, as soon as she would move to get up to go to the bathroom, she would again lose it all.

When they had reached the 32nd week and when the baby weighed 1.80k, they decided for a caesarian section delivery, effected on 31 May 2000. The newborn daughter, Gianna, was in good shape with the exception of the left foot which was twisted, probably because of compression with the uterus.

The problems did not cease there. They found that Elisabete had a wound within a uterine muscle to which the placenta had adhered, thus remaining in place. She had a serious hemorrhage and her lungs collapsed and wound up in intensive care for three days. As part of her treatment Dr. Bicega wanted to interdict her cycle with a kind of false menopause, which would result also in Elisabete not being able to lactate, but Elisabete said she did want to do that.

The newborn was sent home on 17 June weighing 1.960kg. Later a surgical operation and therapy corrected the twisted foot. In July 2001 a pediatrician Dr. Maria Engracia Ribeiro examined the child completely and found her to be perfectly normal and healthy, intelligent and lively, with the strong personality. Another check on 17 January 2002 found no problems in any of the child’s development, with no immune or respiratory problems and was, for her age, in perfect health.

The case of the asserted miracle was studied by the “Consulta Medica” of the Congregation for Causes of Saints on 10 April 2003 who determined that despite the severe prognosis for the fetus and the mother as the result of the total loss of amniotic fluid at the 16th week, and despite medical treatment inadequate for such a grave situation, the positive outcome of the pregnancy and health of mother and child were inexplicable in medical terms. The decree super miraculo was promulgated by the Congregation in the presence of Pope John Paul II on 20 December 2003. Since Gianna Beretta Molla had been beatified on 24 April 1994, her canonization was celebrated on 16 May 2004.

I hereby put to you several points to consider, any of which might serve as a starting point for comments below:

  1. Saints are presented to us by Holy Mother Church for “the two I’s”: imitation and intercession.
  2. As all Christians are called to imitate Christ, we also must experience self-emptying and the Cross, abandonment to providence and self-donation. We must be willing to lose everything.
  3. We are not alone: the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant are closely knit, interwoven in charity. We on earth must intercede for each other and believe and ask for the intercession of the saints.
  4. God makes use of the weak to demonstrate His might and love.
  5. If we do not believe in miracles, we do not ask for them. If we do not ask for them, they will not be granted.
  6. Our life of faith is noticed by non-believers and they are not unaffected.
  7. What a difference a bishop can make!
  8. How often do you invoke the help of the saints and holy angels?
  9. God’s ways are not our ways.
  10. No one is too small to be an occasion of grace for others.
Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 141

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 141

ASK FATHER: A Transitional (to priesthood… not something else) Deacon asks about how to give people blessings

From a transitional deacon…

QUAERITUR:

I am a transitional deacon soon to be ordained a priest. As that day draws near, I realize that my seminary has taught me absolutely nothing about how to bless people and things. As I am doling out first blessings, do I impose my stole on people’s heads? Do I simply hover my hand over objects? Please help meor not look like a buffoon.

Thanks for asking about this.   Your seminary has not covered it?  Imagine my shock.

I have written about it before, but these things bear repetition for the sake of a new wave of priests and for the sake of the faithful.

First, keep it simple.

PRIME RULE: When you give your first blessings, don’t hunch over people and grab their heads, whispering archly, as if you were a dark wizard extracting their life force for your own evil purposes.

Don’t hunch.   Stand up straight!  If you simply must hold your hands over someone, hold them straight and parallel to the ground.   When you make the Sign of the Cross, put your left hand on your breast while you make the Sign with your right.

And… just how much do you think you can squeeze into a blessing before people get impatient or lost in what you are trying to say?  There is no need to throw in all sorts of other ingredients as if those to be blessed were lined up at a salad bar …  sprinklings of pious imagery, vague invocations of niceness and holy fluff, rambling discourses that dead end in words like “beautiful”.   I’m pretty sure you know what I mean.

Say the blessing prayer and get over yourself.

The blessing:

Benedictio Dei omnipotentis Patris, et + Filii, et Spiritus Sancti descendat super te [plural: vos] et máneat semper. Amen.

May the blessing of Almighty God, Father, + Son, and Holy Spirit/Ghost, descend upon you and remain with you forever. Amen.

Memorize this.  It is not out of bounds to touch the person’s head lightly at that “te” with an extremely brief “laying on of hands” gesture.  With “vos” that might not be practical.

This is also the blessing the priest should give to servers after Mass.

HOWEVER: There are some blessing prayers for people having to do with their state in life.  Some are quite lovely.  You would probably have to have these texts at hand.   Alas, I don’t have their provenance!  I had an old file that has gone from computer to computer over the years and eventually to this blog.   These are blessings prayers for use by new priests.  By ready to adjust for plurals.

Formulæ Benedictionum

Sacerdoti:

Resúscitet in te Dóminus grátiam Spíritus Sancti quam per mánuum impositiónem accepísti, ut sis dignus mínister Christi et fidélis dispensátor misteriórum Dei – sis sal Christi numquam infatuándum et lucérna ardens in domo Dei – memor sit Dóminus omnis sacrifícii tui, et holocaústum tuum pingue fiat. Tríbuat tibi Dóminus longitúdinem diérum et finálem grátiam, ut possis bonum certámen certáre et cursum tuum felíciter consummáre, adiuvánte Dómino nostro Iesu Christo, qui vivit et regnat cum Deo Patre in unitáte Spíritus Sancti Deus, per ómnia saécula sæculórum. Amen.

Clerico [Let’s call this deacons and major seminarians]:

Effúndat super te Dóminus Spíritum sapiéntiæ et intelléctus, consílii, sciéntiæ, fortitúdinis, pietátis ac timóris Dómini, ut evádas sacérdos secúndum cor Dei. Adímpleat Deus petitiónes tuas et omne consílium tuum confírmet, ac omni benedictióne cœlésti ac terréstri benedícat te Deus Pater et Fílius et Spíritus Sanctus.  Amen.

Regulari vel Moniali:

Deprecatiónes tuas admíttat Dóminus ad sacrárium exauditiónis suæ, ut possis gloriári in cruce Dómini nostri Iesu Christi, per quem tibi mundus crucifíxus est et tu mundo, et cui fidéliter desérvis, ipse sit tibi merces tua, qui vivit regnat cum Deo Patre in unitáte Spíritus Sancti Deus, per ómnia saécula sæculórum. Amen.

Patri vel Matri [adjust if they are together]:

Accipe Pater (Mater) benedictiónem a fílio, qui tibi sit báculus in senectúte tua, benedícat te Deus benedictiónibus cœli et terræ, ímpleat omnes petitiónes tuas, det tibi ómnia secúndum cor tuum, confírmet omne consílium tuum. Largiátur tibi de abscóndito thesaúro suo, plenitúdinem omnis grátiæ et longitúdinem vitæ tuæ; cum autem defécerit virtus tua non derelínquat te Dóminus, sed tríbuat tibi finálem grátiam meque in ætérnæ claritátis gaúdio fáciat te vidére, qui vivit et regnat in saécula sæculórum. Amen.

Fratri vel Sorori:

Accipe frater (soror) benedictiónem a fratre tuo, quam Deus ratam hábeat in conspéctu suo (reliqua si sit adolescens, ut infra pro adolescente; si virgo, ut pro virgine.)

Adolescenti:

Omnipoténtia ætérni Dei Patris consérvet te, Fílii Dei sapiéntia erúdiat te, et Spíritus Sancti cáritas inflámmet te, ut crescas sapiéntia et ætáte, ac grátia apud Deum et hómines. Sis báculus in senectúte tuórum paréntum, et vídeas bona Ierúsalem ómnibus diébus vitæ tuæ, ac omni benedictióne cœlésti ac terréstri benedícat te Deus, Pater et Fílius et Spíritus Sanctus.

Virgini:

Tríbuat tibi Dóminus de abscóndito thesaúro suo grátiam, ut sis virgo sápiens, et una de número prudéntum. Effúndat super te Spíritum pietátis, castitátis ac timóris sui, ut sponso cœlésti complacére, et ad thálamum eius admitti mereáris, qui vivit et regnat in saécula sæculórum. Amen.

Benedictio communis: [along with the other one, above, the winner!]

Omni benedictióne cœlésti et terréstri, benedícat te omnípotens Deus, Pater et Fílius et Spíritus Sanctus. Amen.

Benedictio generalis: in casu innumerabilis populi ambas manus extendendo dicit:

Pax Dómini nostri Iesu Christi, et virtus sanctíssimæ passiónis, et signum sanctæ crucis, et intégritas beatíssimæ Maríæ Vírginis, intercessiónes ómnium Sanctórum et suffrágia electórum Dei sint in vobis, ut inimícos vestros visíbiles et invisíbiles, máxime in hora mortis superáre valeátis, et omni benedictióne cœlésti et terréstri benedícat vos omnípotens Deus, Pater et Fílius et Spíritus Sanctus.

Per impositiónem (extensiónem*) mánuum meárum sacerdotálium, et per intercessiónem beátæ Maríæ semper Vírginis, et Sancti (Sanctæ)…, et ómnium Sanctórum; Benedíctio Dei Omnipoténtis, Patris, et Fílii, et Spíritus Sancti, descéndat super te (vos) et máneat semper Amen.

*Extensiónem” was/is used for anyone tonsured or for consecrated nuns.  You wouldn’t touch them.

Another thing about 1st Blessings.

While there is a plenary indulgence given to the faithful who assist devoutly at the first Mass of a priest (and also as his 25, 50, 60 and 70 year anniversaries, as per Enchiridion Indulgentiarum, art. 27), there is no indulgence now for receiving the first BLESSING of a priest.

NB: HOWEVER: The law permits diocesan bishops the right to grant partial indulgences to their subjects (Enchiridion 7).   Hence, a new priest could ask the bishop to grant for a period of time – say 30 days – a partial indulgence for those who receive his first blessing.  In the case of religious, the newly ordained’s major superior could ask the bishop to grant this.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Linking Back, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged , ,
1 Comment