ASK FATHER: Hosts and wine for when we have to shelter an underground priest – UPDATE

UPDATE: 27 January 2021:

A post by Peter Kwasniewski over at NLM dovetails well with this post. He writes about the building of home altars, that is, altars useful for the celebration of Mass in your home. This might be necessary in the future. In the meantime, in this time of relative calm, it will be good and wholesome. Use good weather to sow crops and to reap and to fill your barn against the day of famine, plague and sword.

Peter has a great quote from St. John Golden-mouth (Commentary on Ps 41) at the end to support his point.

As those who bring comedians, dancers, and harlots into their feasts call in demons and Satan himself and fill their homes with innumerable contentions (among them jealousy, adultery, debauchery, and countless evils); so those who invoke David with his lyre call inwardly on Christ. Where Christ is, let no demon enter; let him not even dare to look in in passing. Peace, delight, and all good things flow here as from fountains. Those [pagans] make their home a theatre; make yours a church. For where there are psalms, and prayers, and the dance of the prophets, and singers with pious intentions, no one will err if he call the assembly a church.

If you can have a big screen TV and sound system, perhaps you can have a home altar.

ORIGINALLY Published on: Jan 27, 2021


From a reader….

QUAERITUR:

IF/when we would need to shelter an underground priest, what do we need on hand to make hosts and what type of wine should we have for proper matter for consecration? thanks!

I’ve written about this before, for example, HERE.   That post has more detail and suggestions.

However, for the sake of your question, here is a quick answer.

Now, you can buy hosts pretty easily: link to 1000 small HERE and lovely priest’s hosts HERE.  All you need for valid matter for the hosts, is wheat flour and water and heat.  Any sort of wheat flour will do, provided that it is truly wheat.  There are different varieties.    There shouldn’t be anything else mixed in with the flour and water.  Host irons are generally used to form and cook/bake/sear the hosts. US HERE – UK HERE   But in a pinch hosts need not be uniform or pretty.  Just make sure they are unleavened and pure.  Thin batter… flat hot surface… ZAM!  Host.

Wine is a little more complicated.  You can get a lots of hosts out of a bag of flour but not so many Masses from a bottle of wine.  Also, wine can go bad.  Some fortified wines are valid matter for Mass.  I’ve written about that HERE.  Fortified wines are valid if the added spirits are distilled from grapes and the quantity of alcohol does not exceed 18%.   Marsala and Port and Vin Santo, which have long shelf life, can be valid, but not Sherry due to when the spirits were added.     I these still relatively calm times it is still easy to buy certified altar wine by the bottle or jug.   Otherwise, in a pinch other wines from grapes with natural fermentation will do.  Most store bought wine, even with sulfites, is valid matter.

Also, and this is important for the sort of days you might be describing, where priests are on the move or at least forced into homes, etc., because churches have be closed or targeted… here is a way to make wine valid for Mass from raisins.   For example, this recipe HERE.

You might want to try gathering the ingredients and making some.    You will need more than raisins.  You could stock up on things used in the process like campden tablets and Montrachet dry wine yeast and yeast nutrient and pectic enzyme and acid blend (or lemon juice) and wine tannin (or tea bags).  Some of those – like the tannin – could be optional, but they might make the process easier and more likely to produce the desired result, wine from grapes which has alcohol, even a small percent, through fermentation.   You should have a hydrometer for that.  Whereas bottles or purchased wine might be hard to store in great quantities for a long period, the ingredients could be, including raisins.    Some simpler recipes could work as well, so long as they produce valid matter.  Remember, the wine produced must have had some natural fermentation which produces alcohol as a by product.  It doesn’t have to be high percentage.  Also, some raisins get a treatment of oil, which can affect your outcome, or of sulfites or sulphur.  I’d go with organic if possible.  If you go off to some other site to hunt up recipes for grape wine, please do use my links to get your supplies.

And don’t imagine that wine from raisins will be awful.  Very fine wines are made in Italy from grapes that are desiccated, including Amarone and Recioto.

So, perhaps when I get myself settled down in a new QTH we could start a collective Mass wine from raisin project and see how our efforts turn out!

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Semper Paratus, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
3 Comments

Pecknold on Biden on Augustine

I studiously avoided any coverage of the “inauguration” last week.  I have, after that, done my best to avert my eyes from news.   I did see that D.C. was turned into an armed bastion through the deployment of subsequently abused National Guardsmen.   Sounds American to me.  Right up there with, “Ausweis, bitte!”

Today I read a good piece at First Things by Chad Pecknold about Biden’s use of St. Augustine in his address.  Pecknold exposes how “Biden’s call to unity is empty rhetoric.”

Pecknold explains how Biden misused (missed the point of) a line from City of God about what unifies a commonwealth or people: the common objects of their love.  I direct the readership to go read the clear and concise piece over there.  It’s really good.

Let’s just say that Augustine and Biden have rather different views.

For a good commentary on the monumental City of God, you might try Gerard O’Daly.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments

ASK FATHER: Indulgence for kissing a new priest’s hands

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Is there really an indulgence for kissing the hands of a newly ordained priest?  I’ve heard different accounts.  And how long is “newly”?

I have written about this before.   For example, HERE.

There is no indulgence, at this time, for a priest’s first blessing or for kissing the new priest’s hand.  It is a praiseworthy custom and it should be fostered.   The hands of the priest are important, because they are consecrated.  It is a good custom to kiss the hand of the priest and to ask for his blessing.

Also, the law permits diocesan bishops to grant a partial indulgence to their subjects (EnchInd 7).  Thus, deacons about to be ordained to the priesthood could ask – ahead of time – the bishop to grant an indulgence for those who receive their first blessing for, say, a period of a year.  In the case of religious, their major superior could grant it.  This should be arranged ahead of time, not at the last minute.  Perhaps it could be part of a diocese’s regular practice.  Perhaps the vocation director or the liturgy director could put a note in their file for “ordination preparation” along the lines of “ASK THE BISHOP FOR…”.

More about “hands”.  Why hands?

Obviously, the priest holds the Host in his hands.  He holds the chalice, which ought to be consecrated with chrism.  But these days, anyone, it seems, and everyone can hold the Most Holy (aka “the white thing”).  This has done horrific damage to our Catholic identity and self-understanding.   The priest’s hands are consecrated for a reason: to handle that which is Most Holy.

On an amusing note, someone wrote recently that a perennial fanatic about women’s ordination made the false claim that women were forbidden to wash altar linens because of the Church’s misogyny.  Women were only allowed to touch the linens after the priest did a first washing.   Imagine the outrage!  The horror of such hatred of women!

The fact is that no lay person, male or female, was to wash linens until a priest had done a first washing or rinsing because the there could be particles of the Eucharist on the linens, stains from the Precious Blood, and the priest’ hands are consecrated to handle the Eucharist.   So, consecrated hands do the first washing and then lay people, male or female, can do the rest.   It’s not that lay hands or people are bad.  It’s just that the priest’s hands are consecrated to handle that which is Most Holy.

This is why there is, in some places, a good custom of altar boys using gloves to move sacred vessels, such as emptied and purified ciboria.

The hands of the priest are indeed special.  We already have a hint about this in the writings of Paul.  In 1 Timothy 2:8 we read:

I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands [hosious xeiras] without anger or quarreling;

Yeah… without “anger or quarreling”.  Nice try, Paul.

Anyway, I think that “lifting holy hands” business indicates a liturgical setting and also points to priesthood.

Paul clearly envisions a liturgical setting that is modelled on the old covenant liturgy.

In Hebrew, the idea of consecration of priestly hands involves the word “filled”.  “Filled” hands are doing holy work.  To “fill the hand” is a way of saying in Hebrew, “ordain, consecrate”.  The Greek version of the Old Testament, when a man was ordained the Greek used for consecrated was “perfected”.  This hearkens to how Christ Himself was “perfected” through His suffering and death.  The Greek talks about the perfection of the priest’s hands.   Priests would fill their hands with the sacrifices of the people, incense, wave-offerings, animals, etc.

In 1 Timothy 2, when Paul talks about “lifting holy hands” he is sure talking about sacred worship and priesthood, liturgy and proper roles.

Paul already underscores how the priest’s hand’s are important.   Since Paul and the early Church, our understanding of the priesthood, Holy Orders, the Eucharist – both its celebration and species themselves – and their interconnection, has become deeper and wider.   Indulgence or not, customs associated with the priest’s hand are sound and helpful and they reflect our ever maturing Faith.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged , , , ,
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 60

Photo by Bree Dail.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

Navy Chaplain posthumously received the Navy Cross

Here is something that I had readied for posting and then, given recent events, the draft scrolled away from my view.

Take a moment to check out this piece at the Navy Times about the posthumous awarding of the Navy Cross (the Navy’s 2nd highest decoration for valor) to a Catholic chaplain of WWII,  Lt. Thomas Conway, the last chaplain to die that war.

The Navy Times piece will put it better than my own summary.  Suffice to say that his courage as he and hundreds of others were stranded in literally “shark infested waters” should serve as an example to me and to me brother priests in every sort of activity.

We are in our own kind of “shark infested waters” right now but we have to, all of us, persevere for the sake of those who depend on us.    Our Eternal Father, who is strong to save, will give us all the graces we need if we stay true.

As I’ve been repeating to a lot of frustrated, down-hearted people who write to me these days, of all the universes God could have created, He created this one, into which He called us into existence at exactly the right point in time and with exactly the right set of tools to carry out our little piece of His overarching, divine Plan.

If we dedicate ourselves to our state in life, as it is hic et nunc, here and now, God will give us all the actual graces we need to fulfill our part in His economy of salvation.

A war-fighter in dire harm’s way is in the safest place spiritually he can be if he acts out of duty and love of God, family and country. So too the priest. Even if the priest is trodden on by his more powerful clerical brethren and unfairly attacked by world-mired laity, he is in the safest spiritual place he can be if he acts out of love of God, Church and patria.

Perhaps this is why old soldiers and old priests tend to be great friends.

It is an honor to have been called by God to live in these difficult times.  Fidelity and the pursuit of His will bring greater graces than if our paths were smooth.

Fr. Conway, thank you for your example and rest in peace.

 

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, Priests and Priesthood, The future and our choices | Tagged
3 Comments

ASK FATHER: Communion in the hand at the Traditional Latin Mass

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father, is allowing Communion in the Hand at the TLM/EF Mass something that is at the discretion of the local ordinary?
I don’t know if some of our parish’s “extra” priests are confused, but even though my goal is not people watching, I’ve noticed Hosts being placed into the hand of people beside me at the rail, recently, at our EF Mass – which was recently re-allowed to have the distribution of Holy Communion *during* Mass.

I’m not sure if I need to raise awareness to someone or not, but the “just be grateful that ____” argument for “dealing” with things “during Covid” is getting old.

I suspect that virtually all priests who celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass know full well that Communion on the hand is not allowed.

Although there was, if memory serves, a note to a bishop from the Congregation for Divine Worship saying that Communion could be given on the hand at a TLM, I note that that Congregation does NOT have competence in matters of the TLM.  That should be handled by the section in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which was formerly the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei“.

However, these days, bishops tend to do whatever the heck they want to do and there really isn’t anything that can be done about it.

The lay faithful or priests might have the law or facts or commonsense on their side, but it really doesn’t make a difference if a bishop wants to impose his will, lawfully or not.  Priests are under a lot of pressure and, contrary to popular opinion, don’t have much power. Priests are accountable to bishops but, in effect, bishops aren’t accountable to anyone except in the most extreme situations. There is little that a parish priest can do if a bishop decides to listen to the few complainers rather than the priest and the majority.   It seems to happen quite often that a priest will undertake something in a parish, such as celebrate ad orientem or put in a Communion rail, or start some Gregorian chant, or use a biretta.  The changes will be well received by 99% of the faithful.  However, a couple of nasty Karens will gripe to the bishop and the bishop will back them and not the priest and the 99%.  Consequently, Father is forced by “downtown” to walk his changes back, thus undermining his role in the parish for the future.  This is not rare.

So, dear reader, if you are seeing Communion in the hand at your TLM, try not to think badly of the priest.  It is possible that the bishop dropped the hammer on him and he is in a jam.  Try to remember that about the only thing that Father has a right to is Christian burial.   Also, try not to think badly of people who choose to receive Communion in the hand at a TLM.  There have been months of COVID brainwashing by now and people are getting worn out.

Yes, it is all “getting old”.

I recommend prayers for those who are under pressure, such as your parish priest.

I recommend acts of reparation.

I recommend that we all GO TO CONFESSION.

Let’s pray that God will remove this scourge through a great miracle, the sudden, complete and lasting elimination of all ill effects, spiritual and physical, from the Wuhan Devil, this cursed virus.

Let’s ask St. Joseph, in this year dedicated to him, to be a true protector of the Church.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged
3 Comments

With a tip of the biretta to the great Fr. Hunwicke

With a tip of the biretta to the great Fr. Hunwicke.  o{]:¬)

On his indispensable blog, Fr H left me consoled even in the midst of multiple challenges, yea, even some tragedies: children spiritual and physical are being destroyed by the Left on all sides, in the secular and in the ecclesial realms alike.  Here is what Fr. H offered, though this is a somewhat fuller quotation:

πολλαὶ μορφαὶ τῶν δαιμονίων,
πολλὰ δ᾽ ἀέλπτως κραίνουσι θεοί:
καὶ τὰ δοκηθέντ᾽ οὐκ ἐτελέσθη,
τῶν δ᾽ ἀδοκήτων πόρον ηὗρε θεός.
τοιόνδ᾽ ἀπέβη τόδε πρᾶγμα.

This is used by the playwright in several works as a concluding chorus.

To modify a little an adage I’ve used here before, picked up from a frustrated auxiliary bishop many years ago about his own boss and other clergy he had to deal with,

“There are Medeas of both sexes.”

NB to you clerical Medeas: epilogues are not necessarily the end of a thing.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 59

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

ACTION ITEM: Good article at Crisis. Then Fr. Z rants.

There is a good article at Crisis today, which all of you should both send by email and print out and hand to or send by mail to both your local priests and your bishops.

This is time sensitive.

As I have been hammering away at for some time now, there is a demographic sinkhole opening up under the Church. COVID-1984 accelerated its inexorable yawning. The “beige” Catholics will fall through this hole fairly soon, not to be seen again. The juggernauts of time and biology will take from our midst our dear seasoned Catholics. With them will go their economic support of the Church. Their children and grandchildren, the majority CINO, unchurched, will stop even pretending that they embrace the family faith. The institutional Church will be left without much material support, which will lead in turn to the loss of property, in a kind of cascade.

Present efforts at New Evangelization, as good and well-meaning as they are, are insufficient to face this ontological threat. That’s because they lack an essential component. Adequate sacred liturgical worship.

The fact is: WE ARE OUR RITES.

They shape us from the outside in and the inside out. They inform us and give us our identity. In order to have an impact on the world, which is our Christian duty, we have to know who we are. Hence, we need solid CULT, CODE and CREED. Worship, Catechism, and Law. Every good initiative we have as a Church must begin in and return to sacred liturgical worship. This is clear because of the necessity of the virtue of Religion, which must order our lives, orient us.

Benedict XVI knew what he was talking about when he wrote about a smaller and more committed Church. He knew what he was doing when he issued the “emancipation proclamation”, Summorum Pontificum, which freed up the use of the traditional Roman Rite. He had a kind of “Marshall Plan”, as I put it, to help rebuild Catholic identity after the devastation wrought in the post-Conciliar wars so that the Church could stand as a bulwark against the onslaught of the Dictatorship of Relativism.

Our sacred liturgical worship is the key to who we are. If it is disordered, institutionally, then our identity as Catholic will be disordered.

We are obliged, all of us, to fulfill the virtue of Religion. Justice governs what we give to other human beings as their due. But God is a qualitatively different kind of person. Hence, Religion virtue governs that which we give to God as His due. This is primarily accomplished through our sacred worship, as individuals and collectively. If our worship is disordered, then all the other relationships we have will be disordered as well. We, who are God’s images, will be out of sync.

What we see going on around us in the world and in the Church suggests that this is right.

The use of the Traditional Latin Mass will help us to correct our downward trajectory. It will help to overcome the atomization of our congregations which is bound to accelerate in the near future. As massive numbers of Catholic drop away not to be seen again, those groups with a strong identity remaining in the Church will, perforce, find each other, draw together.

Traditional worship is capable of melding them and supporting them in an increasingly hostile environment in a way that the Novus Ordo simply cannot do, especially as it has been used.

We are at a tipping point.

The knock-on effect that learning the Traditional Latin Mass has on priests is remarkable. That knock-on effect ripples beyond the sanctuary to congregations. Even as swathes of Catholics are going to be dropping away due to the COVID-charged sink-hole, we have a number of seminarians and young priests now who are poised to embrace Tradition and implement it in their parishes. They need support, especially when a few old women don’t like what Father is doing and gripe to the bishop – who usually caves in and throws his priest under the bus… for the sake of avoiding a couple complaints. That’s a dead end solution in the long run.

Tradition, far and wide, is attracting the young, with young families. Priest after priest tells me that they get more financial support from their Tradition loving minorities – for now minorities – than from their beige congregations.

An alarmed Enemy is fighting back against Tradition and fighting hard.

The revitalization for the Church through a restoration of our Catholic identity will require nearly heroic courage from priests and bishops.

Priests need to work hard to acquire tools that they were systematically cheated out of in their formation. They will be objects of intimidation, threats to complain to the bishop. They will fear that they can’t do it because the world will come down on them. They can do it, but it will take hard work and support from others. Graces will be given in this undertaking, because the connection of the priest and the altar is fundamental to the Church’s life. No other thing that the priest does is more important. Priests must also be willing to suffer attacks from libs, many of whom are not malicious but who are blinkered and nearly brainwashed.

Next, it is going to require nearly heroic courage and spirit of sacrifice from lay people who must support their priests and encourage them in projects that they will be reluctant to undertake. Lay people must also be ready to engage in their parishes on a new level.

Remember, friends, that we are our rites. As the Church prays, so do we believe and live.

Everything that we are and do as a Church flows from and returns to sacred liturgical worship. We are our rites.  More rites… more variations and modifications… more different “we”s.

Therefore, I circle back now to what I began with at the top of this rant, the article at Crisis.

The writer, Robert V. Greving, argues that the Traditional Latin Mass, with its stability, its control over the priest, its language, can provide unity in a parish among its various groups that the ever-fragmenting Novus Ordo cannot.   It can draw together various groups and “special interests” which otherwise are ghettoized, apart from each, with their own “specialty” Masses.

Pray for and support your Tradition loving priests.  They are going to be under massive attack.  The Enemy is on the move within the Church right now.

We require bold answers to the challenges we face.

Furthermore and finally, no initiative we undertake in the Church today for New Evangelization, to stem the bleeding or to bring the Gospel to new hearts and ears, will succeed it that initiative is not founded on a revitalization of our sacred liturgical worship.

Start all the committees you want. Issue all the pamphlets you can.  Begin in-person or online “inquiry” classes by the score.  Print articles in the local diocesan paper – so sought after today by so many! – or in parish bulletins  Put up smiley bill boards.  None of that will do a fraction of the good that revitalizing our sacred liturgical worship in our churches.  People will see at that other stuff and perhaps have an initial attraction.  Then they will see how Mass is celebrated in most places and … that’ll be that.

All of that stuff with sacred worship which stresses the transcendent, which doesn’t favor atomization, which requires effort and which can more effectively provide the opportunity to encounter Mystery… that will get people’s attention and hold it.  And it will hold them all, in their differences, together.

We are our rites.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , ,
7 Comments

WDTPRS: 3rd Ordinary Sunday – Which is it? “unity and peace” or “abound with good works”?

The Novus Ordo calendar has people in “Ordered” (better than “Ordinary”) Time.

The Collect, or first major oration, for the 3rd Sunday of Ordinary Time in the Ordinary Form”

Omnipotens sempiterne Deus,
dirige actus nostros in beneplacito tuo,
ut in nomine dilecti Filii tui
mereamur bonis operibus abundare.

This was in the 1962 Missale Romanum as the Collect for the Sunday in the Octave of Christmas.

I wrote about sempiternity HERE.

In the superior Lewis & Short Latin Dictionary we learn that beneplacitum means “good pleasure, gracious purpose”.  The preposition in using the ablative case indicates a condition, situation or relation rather than a reference to space where or time when something was occurring.  In the Vulgate beneplacitum translates the original Greek eudokia in, e.g., Eph 1:9; 1 Cor 10:5.  Other phrases are used for eudokia too (e.g., bona voluntas in Luke 2:14, the famous “peace on earth to men of good will” or “peace on earth good will toward men”).  Paul wrote eudokia at the beginning of 2 Thessalonians (1:11-12), rendered as voluntas bonitatis in the Vulgate:

oramus semper pro vobis ut dignetur vos vocatione sua Deus et impleat omnem voluntatem bonitatis et opus fidei in virtute ut clarificetur nomen Domini nostri Iesu Christi in vobis et vos in illo secundum gratiam Dei nostri et Domini Iesu Christi…

…we always pray for you, that our God may make you worthy of his call, and may fulfill every good resolve (omnem voluntatem bonitatis) and work of faith by his power, so that the name of our Lord Jesus may be glorified in you, and you in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ (RSV).

We can find connections between 2 Thessalonians and our Collect at several points: mereamur in the Collect with dignetur in Paul (both having to do with meriting or being worth of), beneplacitum with voluntas bonitatis, bona opera with opus fidei (good works flowing from lived faith), nomen Filii with nomen Domini Iesu Christi.   Taken in the sense of “gracious purpose” we can make a connection to Paul’s vocatio too, our “calling” or the purpose for which God placed us on this earth with a part of His plan to fulfill.

Abundo means, “to overflow with any thing, to have an abundance or superabundance of, to abound in.”  If we go back to the idea of the preposition in and the ablative indicating place or location in space, (in beneplacito tuo) we have an image of our good works originating in God and, coming from Him, overflowing out from us.

Some Protestants are under the false impression that Catholics think we “earn” our way to heaven by our own good works, as if our good works had their own merit apart from God.

No.

Catholics believe that true good works always have their origin in God, but the works are truly our works as well because we cooperate with God in performing them.  Therefore, having their origin and purpose in God, they merit the reward of God’s promises.  As Augustine would say, with His merits He crowns His own works in us.

Whenever you find a reference to works in these liturgical prayers, do not forget the Catholic understanding of good works.

LITERAL VERSION:

Almighty eternal God,
direct our actions in your gracious purpose,
so that in the name of Thy beloved Son,
we may merit to abound with good works.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

All-powerful and ever-living God,
direct your love that is within us,
that our efforts in the name of your Son
may bring mankind to unity and peace.

At least they didn’t split it into two or three sentences.  “Oh God, you are so big.  Help us to be big like you.”

In the Obsolete ICEL version note the vague term “love”, rather than the indication of God’s eternal plan.  Perhaps this is a bit picky, but when I hear “we may merit to abound with good works”, I think we are abounding because of God’s action within us through the good works He makes meritorious.  They overflow from us because of His generosity. In the Obsolete ICEL version, however, God’s “love” is in us, but this leads to “our efforts”.  Yes, this can be reconciled with a Catholic theology of works, but … it just doesn’t sound right.  Also, I don’t think that “efforts” to “bring mankind to unity and peace” means the same as us “meriting” by God’s grace to “abound with good works”.

When we feed the hungry and console those who mourn, visit the shut-in and imprisoned and pray for the dead, sure we are building “unity and peace”, but that phrase is so vague as to mean very little to someone in the pew.

Is it possible that the guitar strumming and all those kumbayas of the 1960’s affected the translators choice of words?  Hmmm….

“Unity and peace” in the “obsolete ICEL” that infected the ears of American Catholics for so long, until the newer translations.  Today we hear that empty notions mouthed by certain American Catholics who have no intention of doing any real work to bring them about in fact.   Sounds nice.  Doesn’t mean much… at best.  At worst… it’s the linguistic cover up of an intentional lie.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

Almighty ever-living God,
direct our actions according to your good pleasure,
that in the name of your beloved Son
we may abound in good works
.

 

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS |
2 Comments