ASK FATHER: “Can a Catholic say or wear clothes that state Biden is not my president?”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Since President Trump was elected Some Democrats have never acknowledged him as president. They say he is not my president. Which was very irritating. Now that Biden has appeared to have won can a Catholic say or wear clothes that state Biden is not my president?

In these United States we still have – for the time being – the 1st Amendment, which states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Wearing such clothing would be an exercise of freedom of speech.  If that is what you truly think and wish to express, you have the right to make an argument and express your view.

If you choose to exercise the free-speech right you still – for the time being – have, you should brace yourself for the negative consequences that Biden supporters will rain down on you.

Prepare to be doxed.

Perhaps to be harassed in your home and place of work.

Prepare to be verbally or physically assaulted.

Prepare your loved ones to be threatened with harm, or actually harmed.

Prepare for attempts to damage your property.

Things will change rapidly in these United States now that we have experienced this election cycle, which is ongoing until it is officially over.

Networks don’t decide that… for now.

 

 

Posted in Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
30 Comments

Who is on Parler?

Posted in ¡Hagan lío! | Tagged
45 Comments

There are so many things wrong with this.

The homosexualist activist Jesuit comes out with this.

There are so many things wrong with this.

First, Joe Biden may be Catholic, since he was baptized into the Catholic Church, but he is, objectively, a bad Catholic.

Second, networks might say that Biden will be President, but that isn’t necessarily what is going to happen.  Networks don’t get to decide that.

Third, “On Eagles Wings” and “Catholic culture” do not belong in the same sentence.

Fourth, Biden mentioned “On Eagles Wings” and Martin and his friends start calling each other?  Really?

Posted in Jesuits, Sin That Cries To Heaven, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
43 Comments

#ASonnetADay – 84. “Who is it that says most? Which can say more…”

Posted in Poetry, Sonnet A Day |
Comments Off on #ASonnetADay – 84. “Who is it that says most? Which can say more…”

ACTION ITEM! New TARTAN for the Personal Ordinariates of Walsingham, St. Peter and O.L. of the Southern Cross

On a lighter note, I received this interesting tid bit today.

You know about the Ordinariates formed to receive Anglicans, etc., in the Church, preserving their traditions, etc.  There are three at this point, for the UK, North American and Australia.

It seem that they are going to have their very own tartan.  And, I say, “why not?”

The tartan is intended for all three Ordinariates, not just for Scots.

The Chaplain of the Ordinariate in Scotland and his wife have undertaken a Kickstarter crowd fundraiser to have the design woven and then made into things tartans are made into.  It was launched on 1 November and has reached 24% of its goal of £2,700.  The project ends on 30 November (St. Andrew’s Day… appropriate).   Translated: At the time of this writing, they’ve raised $1357 of of their goal $3552.

I’ll bet you readers can resolve that pretty quickl!

Among the items that will be available from the tartan are, fabric by the meter, scarves, gents waistcoats, and even a priest’s stole (in white with tartan at the ends… whew).

Actually, I think I’d rather like one of those stoles, which is embroidered with images of Our Lady of Walsingham.  I have Daniel Mitsui’s rendering on my wall here in the Cupboard Under the Stair.

The tartan has so much green that I suppose it could be used for a green vestment.   A solemn set might give the altar boys vertigo.

This is a spiffy project.   Wanna have a look at the tartan?  There’s a video about the pattern and about weaving process which is really interesting.

HERE

 

 

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
2 Comments

#ASonnetADay – 83. “I never saw that you did painting need…”

The “Rival Poet” Sonnets continue!

Posted in Poetry, Sonnet A Day |
Comments Off on #ASonnetADay – 83. “I never saw that you did painting need…”

Priests, lay, can pray this until the election is officially resolved: a binding prayer again evil

There is a massive spiritual war going on over the “soul of our nation”. This is why I have been saying the Exorcism (Title XI, Ch. 3). Lay people should NEVER pray that.

Fr. Chad Ripperger makes this suggestion.  If priests don’t have the faculty of the bishop to use Title XI, Ch. 3 publicly, they can still use this!  Can and SHOULD.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Cri de Coeur, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
22 Comments

“Today I made my first Confession in over 30 years”

From a reader…

Father, if you need some good news, today I made my first Confession in over 30 years. Despite twisting myself into anxious knots for days beforehand, it all went very easily and Father was very kind and supportive. Thank you for your encouragement (and goading!), and thank you for all that you do.

After the day that I’ve had… this choked me up.  Thank you.

Please, Fathers.  Hear confessions.

Go to confession.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
8 Comments

#ASonnetADay – 82. “I grant thou wert not married to my Muse…”

Posted in Poetry, Sonnet A Day |
Comments Off on #ASonnetADay – 82. “I grant thou wert not married to my Muse…”

Canon Law changed – bishops will now need permission of Holy See to establish religious institutes

At vatican.va and National Catholic Register

Francis issued a Motu Proprio and changed 1983 CIC can. 579 “which concerns the erection of religious orders and congregations, referred to in Church law as institutes of consecrated life and societies of apostolic life.”

VATICAN CITY — Pope Francis has changed canon law to require a bishop to have permission from the Holy See prior to establishing a new religious institute in his diocese, further strengthening Vatican oversight over the process.  [“oversight”?  Is that what we are calling it now?]

With a Nov. 4 motu proprio, Pope Francis modified canon 579 of the Code of Canon Law, which concerns the erection of religious orders and congregations, referred to in Church law as institutes of consecrated life and societies of apostolic life.

The Vatican clarified in 2016 that by law the diocesan bishop was required to consult with the Apostolic See before giving canonical recognition to a new institute. The new canon provides further Vatican oversight by requiring the bishop to have the prior written permission of the Apostolic See[Permission… from this Curia.]

According to Pope Francis’ apostolic letter “Authenticum charismatis,” the change ensures that the Vatican will accompany bishops more closely in their discernment about the erection of a new religious order or congregation, and gives “final judgment” over the decision to the Holy See.  [“accompany bishops more closely in their discernment”]

The new text of the canon will go into effect Nov. 10.

The modification to canon 579 makes “the preventive control of the Holy See more evident,” Fr. Fernando Puig, vice dean of canon law at the Pontifical University of Santa Croce, told CNA. [NB: “preventive control”… to keep undesirable results from occurring, of course]

“In my opinion, the base [of the law] has not changed,” he said, adding that “certainly the autonomy of the bishops decreases and there is a centralization of this competence in favor of Rome.”

The motivations for the change, Fr. Puig explained, go back to a clarification of the interpretation of the law, requested by the Vatican’s Congregation for Institutes of Religious Life and Societies of Apostolic Life in 2016.  [The same Congregation which helped out the FFIs.]

Pope Francis clarified in May 2016 that, for validity, canon 579 required bishops to consult closely with the Vatican on their decision, even if it did not require them to obtain permission per se.  [But now it isn’t consultation … it’s permission.]

Writing in L’Osservatore Romano in June 2016, Archbishop José Rodríguez Carballo, the congregation’s secretary, explained that the congregation asked for the clarification out of a desire to prevent the “careless” establishment of religious institutes and societies.

According to Archbishop Rodríguez, crises in religious institutes had included internal division and power struggles, abusive disciplinary measures, or problems with authoritarian founders who feel they are the “true fathers and masters of the charism.”

Inadequate discernment on the part of bishops, Archbishop Rodríguez said, had led to the Vatican needing to intervene in problems which could have been prevented if they had been detected before giving canonical recognition to the institute or society.

In his Nov. 4 motu proprio, Pope Francis said that “the faithful have the right to be informed by their Shepherds about the authenticity of the charisms and about the integrity of those who present themselves as founders” of a new congregation or order.

“The Apostolic See,” he continued, “is responsible for accompanying Shepherds in the discernment process that leads to the ecclesial recognition of a new Institute or a new Society of diocesan right.”

He quoted Pope John Paul II’s 1996 post-synodal apostolic exhortation “Vita consecrata,” which said that new religious institutes and societies “must be evaluated by the authority of the Church, which is responsible for the appropriate examination both to test the authenticity of the inspiring purpose and to avoid the excessive multiplication of institutions similar to each other.”

Pope Francis said: “The new institutes of consecrated life and the new societies of apostolic life, therefore, must be officially recognized by the Apostolic See, which alone has the last judgment.”

So what is now the difference between institutes established by diocesan bishops and those by the Holy See?

I don’t know about what’s going on in Africa, S. America, etc.  However, it seems to me that this is aimed directly at the prevention of the undesirable rise of traditionally oriented religious institutes.   I have a strong sense that just about the only new groups that are being founded are, in fact, tradition leaning.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged ,
35 Comments