ACTION ITEM! For the Covington men at a crucial turn in their young lives!

Since I have been in Tokyo, I haven’t been tracking the US news very much.  I’ve only slightly followed the disgusting Covington Matter.

This morning I caught up.

I learned that Bp. Foys addressed the school, but parents weren’t allowed in.  He seems to have said that he backs them, but ….   The diocesan website has been replaced with a single page statement.  The offices of the diocese had to be cleared because of a threat.

The sky is coming down on these young men.

Over in Cincinnati there are radio spots demanding that Foys back the boys.  Even the Archdiocese of Cincinnati is getting calls, because no one can get through to Covington.

There is something truly demonic driving this.   Remember that this world has its Prince.  Family and life itself are the, as Sr. Lucia said, the final battle ground.   The very first attack on humanity by the Enemy was an attack on creation itself.   It is no surprise that this mess arose from a public march in support of life.

May I suggest to the readership to pray for the boys involved in this storm?   This is a life changing event.   This experience could help some of these young men become true warriors of the Faith.   If the world hates them, it is because they hated the Lord first.  Hence, in their conformity to Christ, so insulted and abused, they could be given mighty grace.  In a time of formation of their manhood for the future, this is a pivotal moment.

Rosaries for them, please?  Hours before the Blessed Sacrament?  Friday penances?

Give these young men your spiritual support.   As St. Augustine says, where there is charity, there are no distances.

Si vis pacem para bellum!

Posted in ACTION ITEM!, PRAYER REQUEST, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Urgent Prayer Requests | Tagged ,
15 Comments

ASK FATHER: Confession before suicide

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I haven’t been to confession in a long time, and I’d like to go soon. But I’ve also been very depressed and considering suicide. So I feel like one of my motivations to go would be to prepare my soul before I do that act.

Would such a confession even be valid? If one of the requirements for a valid confession is a sincere resolve to try not to sin anymore, I’m not sure I could honestly meet that requirement if I am considering suicide in the future.

Whatever I might end up doing in the future, I’d still like to be
forgiven of whatever I’ve done in the past, but it feels like this isn’t an option.

What do you suggest I do?

First, of all… just… NO.   No.  This isn’t the right path.   You simply must tell more people around you what you are thinking and then let them help you.

Next, a basic point of confession – for validity – is that you must have a firm purpose of amendment.  That is, to stop committing the sins you confess and to resolve not to sin in the future as best you can.

Contemplating suicide in s serious way, not just a fleeting moment, with coolness of mind, etc., is itself a mortal sin.  You are not the “lord” of your own life.  God gave you your life and it is His.   Killing oneself is still the killing of a human being, who happens also to be you.  There are circumstances which can mitigate the guilt of any sin, but cooly to approach thoughts of suicide suggests deep problems but not the sort which, as in a moment of despair or fright, etc., lead to self-slaughter.

Also, you cannot get absolution for a sin that you are going to commit.  As for being forgiven for past sins, if you are confessions some sins, but holding out on confession serious thoughts of suicide, then NONE of your sins are forgiven.   For absolution to be valid, we must confession ALL mortal sins in kind and number.  Deliberate withholding of a sin – that is, remembering or knowing it but refusing to say it, rather than forgetting it in a moment of nervousness, etc. – invalidates your confession and absolution.  You are either forgiven or your aren’t.  Withhold serious mortal sins – seriously contemplating suicide is a serious mortal sin, just as seriously contemplating murder is – and you are not absolved of any sins.  You can’t be partially absolved.

Remember: God cannot be fooled and eternity really is forever.  There is no changing one’s mind after the fact.  Period.  Exclamation point.  For-eh-vur.

I suggest that you a) fight these thoughts when they come up by prayers especially to the Holy Spirit.  Suicide smacks of the sin that Christ said is unforgivable: because it involves despair.   Also, b) ask other people around you, who know and want the best for you, for help.  Otherwise, call a hotline… drop into a clinic… tell a cop… tell a teacher… tell a parent… tell a priest… tell someone.

I am sure that people here will, right now, stop and pray for you.

I entrust you to the Mother of God, who loves you as her own, to intercede with the Lord to help you in whatever must be given for peace.

Your life is precious to you for the sake of your soul and heaven.  Your life is also precious to us because we are all in this together.

And…when you find your balance again do go to confession… remembering what I mentioned above.  ALL mortal sins, in number and kind with a firm purpose of amendment.  Consider what a great thing it is to receive Holy Communion – which the dead can’t do – the ultimate sacrament of the living!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Four Last Things | Tagged , ,
Comments Off on ASK FATHER: Confession before suicide

Fr. Rutler on the Covington Matter and a certain bishop

I’ve been out of sync with the US news cycle and, so, I’m catching up.  What I’ve read about these Catholic kids at the March for Life in what we might call the “Covington Matter” is horrifying.

The old Latin phrase in cauda veneno… the (scorpion’s) poison is in its tail…, meaning that the really important point is generally found at the end of a letter, applies to Fr. Rutler’s look at the ruthless and feckless virtue signalers who have so mistreated those kids.    Fr. Rutler does a good job of framing the players, especially irresponsible “journalists”.  (Yes, the scare quotes are ever more appropriate as members of that guild commit self-slaughter.)   Then he gets to the Bishop of Convington.

Our Lord condemned “virtue signaling” in his parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in the Temple. “I thank you, Lord, that I am not like this sinner.” There are Pharisees in every corridor of society, but they find a most comfortable berth in the Church. So it was that the very diocese of the Covington students, without interviewing them or asking for evidence outside the media, promptly threatened to punish them. There was no reference to the hateful racism and obscene references to priests chanted by the cultic Hebrew Israelites as they threatened those Catholic youths. Instead, bishops issued anodyne jargon about the “dignity of the human person” without respecting the dignity of their own spiritual sons. The latest advertisement of the Gillette razor company portraying examples of “toxic masculinity” did not accuse any bishop, but only ecclesiastical bureaucrats would consider that a compliment. Pope Francis, off-the-cuff and at a high altitude in an airplane, once asked, “Who am I to judge?” There might at last be some application of that malapropism to shepherds who jump to judgment and throw their lambs to the wolves of the morally bankrupt media in a display of virtue signaling and in fear of being politically incorrect.

UPDATE

And here is Carlson.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Liberals | Tagged
52 Comments

TOKYO – Day 1-3: Feeding soul and body

Elsewhere I said that I was in Tokyo. I’m still in Tokyo. I am here with a great group of guys for some R&R.

On the evening of my arrival, one of the key figures of Una Voce Japan graciously met me at the airport.   I am deeply grateful to Augustin-san!   When I was settled at the hotel, we met two more Una Voce members and went out for tori nabe, a good way to get to know each other.

My view from my room. I look west and a bit south. I was hoping that in the morning I might be able to see Fuji-san.

The next morning, I was picked up and whisked away to the chapel where the TLM is usually offered.

Alas, the photos I was sent were small, so this is the largest of them.  However, Augustin-san told me that videos of the whole Mass will be posted.

UPDATE 23 Jan:

Here are links to the videos which the great Augustin-san sent this morning.

1 Sprinkling of Holy water to Graduale

2 Alleluja to Homily

3 Homily to Offertory

4 Offertory to Consecration of the Host

5 Consecration of the Chalice to Holy Communion

6 Holy Communion to the end of Mass

Here is the great and well-known Fr. Ikeda, 90 years young, who often says the TLM.  This Sunday he heard confessions.

Fuji-san!

And again.

We went for sukiyaki at a place in the Ginza area.  They do transcendent things with tomato.

Everything that is cooked passes through your small bowl which contains a beaten egg.

Sake… dry… cold.

We also have had shabushabu.   The word comes from the sound the food makes as you swish it in the boiling broth.  One the brethren was shy.

And… yes… I do love my PASMO.

At the Hokusai Museum, I found the best image for the Women’s March I have ever seen.

From the One Hundred Ghost Stories, c. 1983, a demoness holds a freshly-severed child’s head covered in blood.

That just about sums it up.

Below, from a drawing manual by Hokusai, images of lib writers, especially of the Fishwrap, Amerika, etc., trying not to write the truth.

Onward.  To the great Sumo Stadium and the January basho.

If you haven’t seen sumo you are missing something terrific.

Anyway, that’s a partial catch up on what is going on in Tokyo.

My still injured foot is really slowing me (and my friends) down.  But, I am managing.

UPDATE:

Augustin-san sent an update to one of the videos.  HERE

Posted in In The Wild, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
18 Comments

What’s up with the SSPX?

People are asking me about the meaning of a Swiss Bishop, 76 and retiring, who will live with the SSPX at one of their schools.  Rorate has a pretty good round up from different stories.

Basically, the Bishop of Chur, Vitus Huonder, wanted to retire some years ago, but Francis kept him on. Now, with Francis’ blessing, he will retire and live at a boarding school of the SSPX in Switzerland.

Chur has had some conservative bishops, including Wolfgang Haas, now in Liechtenstein. Their tenure has been hard.

What does this mean?

First, consider that, years ago, Benedict XVI lifted the excommunications of the SSPX bishops. That didn’t change the status of the priests, who did not have faculties.

In 2007, Benedict issued the “emancipation proclamation”, Summorum Pontificum.  That was huge.   The impact of that move will have a massive knock-on effect across many sectors of the Church.

Benedict then put the PCED under the aegis of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, seeing that most of the problems facing the Holy See and the SSPX were now doctrinal.

Then, Francis, in the Year of Mercy, found a sideways method of giving the SSPX faculties hear confessions and absolve. That was big. He extended that indefinitely. Then Francis found a way for SSPX priests to witness marriages, in conjunction with bishops of dioceses.

Recently, Francis suppressed the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” (my old gig).  It is now wholly subsumed into the CDF as a “section”.  Its head is the Cardinal Prefect.  The personnel remain in their old digs.  The work goes on.   If now someone messes with Summorum Pontificum, they are messing not with little PCED, but with La Suprema.  Under Francis, the CDF isn’t quite what it once was, but it is still the heaviest of the heavy weight congregations of the Curia.

What we are seeing is a kind of creeping incrementalism.   It is commonly used on the Left to obtain permission of abuses, such as communion in the hand, girl altar boys.   The usual suspects like James Martin or Phyllis Zagano, are employing it to obtain approval of sodomy and women’s ordination.   It is a slow … pick your analogy… drip drip or chip chip or nudge nudge until you get what you want.   It is slow and patient and relentless, like cooking the frog in the slowly heating water.

I often say here, “Brick by Brick!”  Eventually you have built up the edifice… or have torn it down, without making a dramatic move that everyone notices and fights against.

Small gestures of recognition are being given to the SSPX.  Some not so small, when they involve the sacraments of matrimony and of penance, but you get my drift.

The fact is, Francis has okayed that a Bishop live with an SSPX community.   That’s not nothing.

If we turn the sock inside out, there could be other elements to this, which will have to be verified over time.  For example, if this bishop is with the SSPX, it is possible that he will be called upon to confirm and to ordain for the SSPX.  That’s what the other SSPX bishops do, but they are also getting older.   That might contain Bp. Huonder within the SSPX.    If Huonder were not with the SSPX, might he be – in his retirement at some blah blah place – another Athanasius Schneider (bless him)?  Free to travel, pontificate, speak?

In any event, I look forward to seeing what happens next.

It seems to me that we can look with optimism on the recent developments, until anything contrary comes up.

Meanwhile, I believe that these moves, along with what the PCED affirmed in the past, when I was around the place, that the SSPX is not formally schismatic, that you can attend their chapels, that you can fulfill your Sunday obligation at their chapels.  Now it is possible to go to confession and to get married in their chapels.   Those chapels are not parishes.  Their priests are not pastors (parish priests).  Hence, they cannot grant certain dispensations or delegations.   They don’t have, strictly speaking, the cura animarum as a parish priest does.   Nevertheless, you can see which way things are going.

Posted in SSPX, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill | Tagged ,
28 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point made during the sermon you heard at your Mass of Obligation for this Sunday?

Let us know what it was!

For my part, I celebrated Mass, TLM, in Tokyo.  I said a few things in Japanese, but the sermon was in English, with ongoing (not simultaneous) translation.   I spoke about how Paul urged the Romans to patience and to joy.   I spoke about the challenge presented to what was probably a modest family when a bunch of extra guests showed up for the wedding (the Lord and followers).   The lack of wine, the challenge it presented, resulted in the miracle.  The difficulty eventually produced abundance and joy.

This is how we must approach our challenges, with patience and joy.

Specifically, for those present, I suggested that the wine running out symbolized the lack of TLM that the Japanese congregation want so much.  They don’t always have the Mass.   I suggested that they ask Mary to intercede with the Lord to fill their wines jars with beautiful and abundant wine of the TLM.  Also, they should do whatever the Lord tells them: they have to get busy, too.

I was deeply moved by the people I met for the TLM.  These are such good and devout Catholics.   They sang well, making all the responses (as is proper for the Missa Cantata).  They were prayerful.   They wanted Benediction and brought many objects to be blessed.   One earnest man pressed me with a request for Mass for the Poor Souls, which I happily accepted.  Afterwards, a group of men went to a local diner, much as we would have in Rome or New York or elsewhere.  I hope to have some photos and perhaps some video to post.

Pray for this community in Tokyo.  They need the help of good young priests.  Their present priest helper is 90 years old!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
19 Comments

Super-Wolf-Blood Moon!

Tonight… for a lot of you. Alas, I won’t be able to view it. Rats. I would have loved to see this thing against the background of downtown Tokyo, where I am as I write.

We have a Super-Wolf-Blood Moon.

I find the order in which we English speakers want to place our adjectives fascinating.   This order feels right.  But… Super-Blood-Wolf Moon works.

It’s the Wolf Moon, because of the month, Blood because it an eclipse, and Super because the Moon is at perigee with your planet.  It should appear larger than most full moons.

From SpaceWeather.

Explanation: Tonight a bright full Moon will fade to red. Tonight’s moon will be particularly bright because it is reaching its fully lit phase when it is relatively close to the Earth in its elliptical orbit. In fact, by some measures of size and brightness, tonight’s full Moon is designated a supermoon, although perhaps the “super” is overstated because it will be only a few percent larger and brighter than the average full Moon. However, our Moon will fade to a dim red because it will also undergo a total lunar eclipse — an episode when the Moon becomes completely engulfed in Earth’s shadow. The faint red color results from blue sunlight being more strongly scattered away by the Earth’s atmosphere. A January full moon, like the one visible tonight, is referred to as a Wolf Moon in some cultures. Tonight’s supermoon total eclipse will last over an hour and be best visible from North and South America after sunset. The featured time-lapse video shows the last total lunar eclipse — which occurred in 2018 July. The next total lunar eclipse will occur only in 2021 May.

Posted in Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged
13 Comments

WDTPRS: 2nd Sunday after Epiphany – liturgical unicorn

Here is what I offered for my weekly column for the UK’s best Catholic weekly the Catholic Herald – now also in the USA.

This week we encounter a liturgical unicorn. We shall celebrate the Second Sunday in Ordinary Time in the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite, and the Second Sunday after Epiphany in the Extraordinary. What makes this Sunday rare is that the collect is the same prayer in both.  

Although the Council Fathers of Vatican II said that, in the liturgical reform they mandated, nothing should be changed that wasn’t truly for the good of the people and that changes had to flow organically from what went before (SC 23), the editing, re-arranging, transforming and wholesale creating of new prayers was of tectonic magnitude. The traditional Roman Missal has 1,182 orations, of which 36 per cent made it into the newer Missal and, of them, half were altered. Only 17 per cent of the orations remained unchanged. Moreover, many were shifted to other times of the year. This Sunday, however, we have, unchanged, the same collect on the same day in both forms. 

Speaking of unchanged, our collect remains as it was in the ancient Hadrianum Sacramentary which Charlemagne gave to Pope Hadrian I in about 785. Of interest in England, the Sarum Rite had this collect on the Second Sunday after the Octave of Epiphany. Let us see our liturgical unicorn:

Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, qui caelestia simul et terrena moderaris, supplicationibus populi tui clementer exaudi, et pacem tuam nostris concede temporibus.

That simul et connects two or more co-ordinate terms or facts and represents them as simultaneous, “and at the same time, and also”. The deponent verb moderor means “to manage, regulate, rule, guide, govern, direct”.  A moderator is a governing official. Tempus means mainly “time” in general, together with “seasons of times, conditions, circumstances”, or like the Greek kairos, “the appointed time”.

Literal translation: “Almighty eternal God, who govern at the same time things heavenly and earthly, mercifully hearken to the supplications of Your people, and grant Your peace in our temporal affairs.”

Current ICEL translation: “Almighty ever-living God, who govern all things, both in heaven and on earth, mercifully hear the pleading of your people and bestow your peace on our times.”

Today we beg God, as omnipotent guide of all things, for peace in our temporal affairs now, not just later in heaven. And we want the peace that comes from Him, not as the world gives (John 14:27). Remember: no passing, created thing can give us the peace that truly lasts. God alone endures.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS |
2 Comments

Francis suppressed the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”. Fr. Z remarks.

The new “pipe” (some of you will get that) of the Holy See’s communication commisariat issued an editorial about the formal suppression of my old office, the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”.    Well… my old office is still there.  And my old desk, etc.

Tornielli made two points.

First, because there are far more and widespread numbers of the older form being celebrated there is less pastoral need for what the PCED was doing.  Thanks, SP.

Also, because most of the problems with the reconciliation of the SSPX have to do with doctrinal issues, it seems best to put the whole thing in the doctrinal congregation.

There are problems here and there are advantages.

Tornielli made the point that the same personnel are kept on in the new section of the CDF… and the PCED was already a section of the CDF.

Remember, the PCED – which was born as an ad hoc Commission – was already\Po absorbed into the CDF.

Getting my drift?

Some idiots out there will run around with their hair on fire, colliding from the left and from the right.  One idiot shouted BOOM.  But everything he does is for attention, merely. He has kinder to feed, I guess.

Let’s see what happens.

I am tempted to say “plus ça change…”

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
48 Comments

ASK FATHER: Do I have to sing at Mass?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My question is, what am I required to participate in vocally when attending the Novus Ordo Mass. Where I attend, we are prompted to participate in singing four songs, sometimes five, and they are only songs, not many worship worthy. Then at the Responsorial Psalm we are to participate in either singing or praying a phrase. I remember in the Extraordinary Mass, the only requirements were to adore, pray, and follow the Latin if we desired. Of course I now do pray and sing enthusiastically the Credo, Gloria, Sanctus, Agnus Dei, and Pater Noster. It just seems now I am being ushered continuously through the whole Mass, with private devotion and thanksgiving left for after.

Right now I’m on an airplane typing on my phone. Forgive me if I am slightly telegraphic.

I am glad that you want to fulfill your role as a layman at Mass. As a baptized member of Christ’s mystical Body, when you speak and sing and move liturgically Christ the High Priest speaks, sings and moves in you. Christ the Head acts in the priest, Christ the Body in the congregation.

There is a strong impulse for the praying, liturgical Catholic, to make the responses, to rise, to kneel, when appropriate.

It seems to me that when it comes to hymns, which aren’t really liturgical texts, you can make your choices according to your desire. When it comes to the true texts of the Mass, however, official and assigned by the Church, I think there is more weight applied to the baptized congregant.

Are we obliged to speak and sing? No. But we are obliged to be open to speaking, singing, moving according to the texts and flow of the sacred liturgical action.

I think this applies to both Forms, newer and traditional. Popes of the 20th century thought so too, and tried to forward greater participation by responding, especially in singing. Singing, after all, is what one does when he loves (cf Augustine – “cantare amantis est“). The lover loves silently and still. The lover loves singing and gesturing.

A deficiency in the Novus Ordo, magnified by how it is usually celebrated, is the constant sound, the incessant urging to do something, sing, blah blah. There are more controlling rubrics in the Novus Ordo whereas custom guided people in the traditional form.

The traditional form, in its sung forms, Missa Cantata, Solemn, the whole Church, Head and Body together, should sing. After all, they love their roles and being there and doing what they do in fulfilling religion.

Balance must be sought. This is why, by the way, reclaiming the older, traditional form can help calm down the Novus Ordo. It’ll be around for a while yet.

Have I answered?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
27 Comments