Hillary: ”I admire Margaret Sanger enormously… there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her”

I saw an intriguing post online called: Who said it: Adolf Hitler or Margaret Sanger?

Quotes are offered. Guess who said it.

May I observe that Hillary Clinton thinks that Margaret Sanger was wonderful?  She is is “awe” of her.  We can learn a lot from Margaret Sanger.

And yet it is really hard to tell who said what.  Hillary or … someone else.

“What is social planning without a quota?”

“The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature”?

“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people”?

“Sterilization would go far in reducing human misery, not to speak of the financial saving in the upkeep of the unfit offspring”?

Who wrote about “protect[ing] society against the propagation and increase of the unfit”

Who declared that the “destruction” of “sick, weak, deformed children” was more “decent” than the current “wretched” preserving of the “pathological”?

Who encouraged limiting reproduction “to make the coming generation into such physically, mentally capable, socially alert individuals as are..ideal”?

Who advocated a “rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted”?

I got only a 62% on the quiz.

Hillary and Sanger HERE and HERE and HERE.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

 

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged , , ,
25 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point in the sermon you heard for your Mass of Sunday obligation?  Let us know.

I will have Mass later today in a Serragli chapel at San Marco in Florence.  I’ll talk to the pilgrim group about images and good works on this 22nd Sunday after Pentecost.

UPDATE:

Okay, Mass in the traditional Roman Rite has been duly offered.  The sacristan was kind enough to produce an antique pianeta.   I riffed on the question “Whose image is this?”, which we hear in the Gospel about the tax coin offered the Lord.   I turned it sideways and connected it to “Whose image is this?” I am getting in churches and museums.  I reminded them that the Church has given two things to the world as a common patrimony, art and saints.  Both reflect God’s truth and beauty, one in material, plastic stuff, the other in living persons by their words and deeds.  I had a little diversion into a painting of Abraham and Isaac next to the altar, when I, standing there as the priest for Mass I fully realized the relationship of all the paintings in the chapel to the altar, along with the Latin inscriptions over them.  I tied it back into imagery, however, since all the paintings are foreshadowings, types, images of Priest / Victim / Eucharist.  In sum, I ended with the admonition that after the “Wow!” factor hits in these churches and museums, and then the intellectual question of “Whose image is this?”, is satisfied, we have to turn the question around as if to look in the mirror and ask, “Whose image is this?”

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
20 Comments

ASK FATHER: Man regularly takes Hosts home from Mass

From a reader…

Last week I saw one of our parishioners take the host back to his pew. I mentioned this to the visiting priest after Mass and he said to talk directly to the person involved — but he’d left before the final blessing.

I was so disturbed I left a note for our regular priest under his door, but found out later he’s away on annual leave.

This week he did it again with the same visiting priest. I’d done a spot of reading through the week, so I went and sat next to him and said (quietly) that he should eat the host before the priest. He said that he had a medical condition that prevented that (no saliva). [So, he is not taking it to a sick person.]

After Mass, he came up and was obviously disturbed (and probably offended) and proceeded to aggressively argue his point.

I’ll obviously try and see our regular priest when he gets back, but it’s left me perturbed — especially as he was personally aggressive.

Was I right or wrong? Maybe I should have seen him before Mass?

You were not wrong to talk to the man.  Alas, the priest was a visitor who wasn’t able to follow up on this and your parish priest is away.  That creates a bit of an awkward situation.

It is too bad that he has to bear the cross of this medical condition, but that condition doesn’t authorize him to do as he pleases with Hosts from Mass.  The bottom line is that the fellow should not have, should not and should never take home a Host from Mass.  If he has some problem swallowing, then he should see the priest before Mass and find out if there is a way to receive the Precious Blood instead of a Host.

But he cannot take Hosts like that.  That’s just plain wrong.

This is something that the priest at the parish, even if he is not the pastor, should help with.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
32 Comments

Fr. Sirico on the Clinton’s campaign view of the Church

Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta’s emails were hacked.  We see behind the scenes.  We see what they think of Catholics and the Church.  They are simply dreadful.

I found a video commentary by Fr. Robert Sirico about what the Clinton campaign is about.  Fr. Sirico is the head of Acton Institute.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
26 Comments

Fishwrap rots from the head down

I am sure that by now you have heard about how the anti-Catholic Clinton campaign’s anti-Catholic manager John Podesta helped foment dissent in the Church and revolt by establishing anti-Catholic, catholic organizations.  HERE  Undermine the Church as a moral force, push her to squander her moral capital by getting her pastors to water down Catholic teaching and you remove an obstacle to garnering by hook or crook more votes for dem candidates. It’s a tried and true method.

I saw today an interesting email released by Wikileaks about Podesta’s efforts, through one of his minions.  HERE It mentions some interesting catholic entities.

Read the whole thing.  Take note of the prominent role of the Fishwrap and Commonwelt. 

Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 19.05.28

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
23 Comments

Are you hurt, disoriented, frustrated about what’s going on in the Church? Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Two things struck me with special force today.

Today I said the traditional Mass in the Duomo of Florence at the altar of St. Joseph, Patron of the Church, who protects the Church now just as he protected the Holy Family in its time of mortal peril.   I read the reading for the Mass for St. Callistus, Pope and kstyr:

… He said to them, But who do you say that I am? Simon Peter answered and said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Then Jesus answered and said, Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father in heaven. And I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. …

Today I spotted in a comment in the queue including this:

“At a time when the very rock upon which the Church is built is turning to sand…”

No!  In renaming Simon as Rock, Peter, Christ shared his mission and authority with him in a special way.  Peter can only be Rock because Christ is The Rock.  The Rock upon which the Church is ultimately built is Christ Himself.  Nevertheless, it is Christ’s will that the Rocky Ministry, the Petrine Ministry, not Sandy Ministry, be a necessary part of the His Church.  Just as Christ crowns His own merits in us whenever we do something worthy and beautiful, so too Peter’s rocky solidity is rocky because Christ rocks it.  This cannot change until the Doom falls and He returns in glory to take all things to Himself, submits them to the Father, and God is all in all.

So many Catholics today are hurt, disoriented, frustrated.  If they are paying attention to the news, they see all manner of stories about the doings of Popes and Prelates which leave them perplexed, pained and thoroughly pissed off.  I join their ranks for entire minutes at a time, especially on days like today when I saw Pope Francis with a statue of Martin Luther.

Such a gesture means – simultaneously – absolutely nothing and yet not quite nothing.  My visceral reaction was “blech”.  Luther?  Really?  Then I calmed down and my reaction was still “blech”.   But the second “blech” was tempered by the fact that – as a Roman says with that trademark shrug “Meh… Popes come and go.  Big deal.”

If you are getting worked up these days, pay a less attention to news about bishops and popes.  Believe me… it helps.

Being in Rome also helps you to gain perspective.

Although I write this from Florence, being back in Rome for a few days refreshed my ecclesial sobriety.  “Being in Rome” is, by the way, more than just flying to FCO and taking a taxi into the centro.  I’m a convert from Lutheran heresy. I am thoroughly “in Rome”.  It was a blessing and a curse to have spent all the years literally in Rome that I did.  They gave me scars and antibodies and corrective lenses for my presbyter-opia.  We have to maintain a Roman perspective on Popes and Prelates.  Sure, what they do is important… for about 10 minutes, blah blah blah.  Sure, they can be pretty strange or pretty great, for a while, sigh.  In the end…

… Holy Catholic Church is indefectible.

indefectible

What do we mean by “indefectible”, one of the three attributes of the Church, “indefectibility”?

Christ meant His Church to endure to the end of the world. It is, therefore, indefectible, that is, indestructible.

Would the Savior found something on His Incarnation, Death and Resurrection, something rooted in the agony and bloody Sacrifice of Calvary, that was so weak that men like me, some dopey cleric, could erode it?  Is that how we see the Church?  Able to be eroded by us?  Even by a Pope?  Peter, after all, betrayed the Lord.  One twelfth of the Apostles sold the Lord.  The first act of the first conference of bishops was to abandon the Lord.  And yet, here we all are… in this together.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you hermeneutic of rupture types are sniveling, as your heads spin around and you float above your beds, “You aren’t in this with us!  We are for real change and spirit-filled dynamism of blue skying together!  We know that the spirit will guide us beyond as we church together.  She will open the doors and windows and bring perpetual revolution and ‘Catholic Spring’ and with … and…. and people like you… yooouuuuu…. will finally be BEHIND BARBED WIRE WHERE YOU BELONG!  Because… because… you …hate Vatican II!  Which didn’t go nearly far enough! Hans Küng says so! Because of people like YOOOOUUUU.  GAH!  Uglúk u bagronk sha pushdug….”

Meanwhile, I say…

The Savior knew that we in our times would need the Church just as much as the men and women in the age of martyrs needed her. Therefore, the same Church endures and cannot be turned to sand no matter what we do to it.

Christ said to Peter in Matthew that the “gates of hell” would not prevail.  Attacks of the Enemy from within and from without, through false teachings or immorality or violence cannot shake the foundation of the Church.  He did not guarantee that the Church would survive with the comfortable elements we know it in, say, 21st century Madison, WI or … wherever.  The visible Church in her members will grow and shrink like a living thing, but she will never be overcome.  History has borne out the Lord’s promise.

Christ said to the Apostles before his Ascension: “Behold, I am with you all days, even unto the consummation of the world” (Matt. 28:20).   Since the Apostles were mortal men who passed, he was talking through them to us, through the ages to our own day and beyond.  They understood this and passed this true teaching down. It has been a faithful teaching that cannot be other than as true now as it was true when it came from Christ’s own lips.

C’mon!  Where’s your faith?  This is Christ’s promise we are talking about here, right?

As seeds germinate and grow they go through many stages, but they remain what they were in the beginning: tomato or mustard.  Tomato seeds don’t grow to be mustard trees.  The newly conceived human being cannot grow into a giraffe or sea urchin.  The Church, having stages and changes and growth and decline and illness and recovery and strength and activity and rest and lassitude and energy remains precisely what Christ meant her to be: His Body on Himself the Rock with its clear constituent elements that we can perceive and which tell us which is His Church and which is not.   St. Ambrose uses the analogy of the Moon: it wanes and waxes, it is dark then bright, it can even be eclipsed, but, it’s always there and it is always the Moon.

Not only did our Lord says that He would be with us, but He sent the Holy Spirit to give life to the Church as the soul does to the Body.

How can that be inconstant and false?  WE can be inconstant and false.  Christ cannot be.  I believe Him.  The Catholic Church is so great, so strong and true that not even men like me – or any of the ridiculous clerics and prelates out there – can break her or do anything to undermine her in any fundamental way.  We – they – I – can hurt some souls – we can hurt each other – and woe to those who do, but we cannot change the Church’s very nature.

If you are irritated about something going on right now, something manifestly stupid, wicked or just ill-conceived, a well-intentioned misstep in judgment, examine your own consciences and …

… GO TO CONFESSION.

That’s what I do.

UPDATE:

On this score, One Mad Mom has a few interesting things to say.  HERE

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
56 Comments

NYC 16 & 18 Oct: Talks by Fr. John Hunwicke on great topics

It would be nice to be somewhere near New York City in order to be able to attend these great talks by my friend Fr. John Hunwicke, of the Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham.

16_10_14_Hunwicke_NYC

Most erudite?

Posted in Events, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
3 Comments

Rome-Assisi – Day 4-5: Francis, Prayer and Exile

This is what is in the window of Gammarelli right now.  You can tell that they are getting ready for a consistory.

Off to Assisi.  First stop, Santa Maria degli Angeli and a visit to the little Porziuncula church.

\

This is the itty bitty church involved in the plenary indulgence that comes up a couple times a year.


The place where St. Francis died: the chapel of the “Transitus“.

Up to the big church on the hill.

The tomb of St. Francis.  I spent some time in intense prayer here, talking to him about the Pope.

Upper Basilica.  Walls by Giotto.

Trinkets of the life of Francis: stuff given to him by the Sultan.  You know the story.

Then we were off to visit St. Claire.  I spent some serious time here also, asking for some help about something that is troubling to lots of people.

Off to Florence, where the bread is not salty.

Florentine bread.  Blech.

Dante uses salty bread as a symbol of exile.  If you are a Florentine, and you taste salt in the bread, then you know that you are not in Florence.

Pappardelle al cinghiale.

Walking back for a night’s rest.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

Feingold (D-WI): Hillary Might Issue Executive Order on Guns

Both the up-ticket and down-ticket races this election are important. For me, an overriding issue is appointments to the SCOTUS and judiciary. Next, and related to it, is to halt the erosion of our civil rights. One of the rights that protects the other rights, along with freedom of speech, religion and assembly, is the 2nd Amendment and the right to bear arms. This right checks tyranny. The first thing that oppressive regimes do is curtail freedom of speech and assembly and religion. And they confiscate firearms.

I saw this interesting story about a candidate in the state in which I will vote in November.

From Free Beacon (which originally caught my eye because I thought it said “free bacon”:

Feingold: Hillary Might Issue Executive Order on Guns

Russ Feingold, the former Democratic senator from Wisconsin who is running again in an attempt to win back his old Senate seat, was recorded at a fundraiser saying that Hillary Clinton might issue an executive order on guns.

The video was captured by James O’ Keefe’s Project Veritas at an Aug. 17, $2,700 per-head fundraiser held at the Palo-Alto, Calif., home of Democratic donors Amy Rao and Harry Plant. Palo-Alto is located 10 minutes away from Stanford University, where Feingold taught after leaving his position as a special envoy at the U.S. State Department.

Feingold can be heard in the video discussing what Hillary Clinton could do in relation to guns if she were to be elected president.

“If there’s still Republican control in Congress, and if Hillary is elected, is there anything she can do to uhh…,” a person asks Feingold within the video. “Well, there might be an executive order,” Feingold responds.

“Oh, so she can, I know that Bara…” the questioner counters. Feingold then talks of President Obama’s executive orders throughout his two terms.

“He did some executive orders with the aspects of waiting oeriods. But what we all need is the Senate, have her there, and then put pressure on the House. And we might win the House,” Feingold says.

[…]

Posted in Going Ballistic, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
22 Comments

An Archbishop speaks: “What should Catholics do when we vote in November?”

When Archbishop Samuel Aquila of Denver was a medical student, he had a couple harrowing run ins with abortion.  He reflects on these dreadful experiences and applies them to how to choose how to vote in the presidential election.  HERE

Read the whole thing, but here is the end part for those with little time or patience. BTW… he is saying nothing particularly complicated. Every Catholic ought to know this and then ACT ON IT. Staying home is NOT an option this time.

Excerpt:

With this background, the Archbishop addresses the 2016 presidential election in the following terms. ‘Both candidates are very poor, have little credibility and have made comments that have ruffled my feathers,’ he begins. ‘The American people are fed up with politicians and the ruling class of both parties. This being so, what should Catholics do when we vote in November?

The Democratic party platform demonstrates a ideological commitment to abortion, which must be opposed, the Archbishop points out. Democrats have declared their intention to repeal the Hyde Amendment, which restricts federal funding of domestic abortions, and the Helms Amendment, which restricts federal funding of abortions overseas. He also points out the connection to religious liberty, using as an example the long-standing battle between the U.S. government and the Little Sisters of the Poor to force the religious order’s compliance with the Affordable Care Act’s abortion and contraceptive provisions.

In contrast, the Republican Party platform supports the Hyde Amendment and, just this year, has strengthened its defense of life, calling for the suspension of funding for Planned Parenthood, prohibiting abortion by dismemberment and opposing assisted suicide. ‘The right to life is the most important and fundamental right because life is necessary for any other right or issue. Other issues can be discussed legitimately among Christians – such as what policies are most effective in care for the poor – but every follower of Christ must oppose at all times the inflicted direct killing of an innocent human being,’ the Archbishop states.

UPDATE:

See the comments of Archbp. Chaput about the Dems who work to subvert the Church.  HERE

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged ,
99 Comments