There are a lot of problems in the Church today, and nearly all of them are coming from a certain sector.
Here is something disturbing from Catholic Culture, which I shall simply reproduce with my emphases and comments.
The superior general of the Society of Jesus [aka Jesuits] has said that all Church doctrine must be subject to discernment. [aka “If you don’t like it, you can eventually do enough intellectual fan-dances until even 2+2=5.”]
In an interview with a Swiss journalist, Father Arturo Sosa Abascal [head of the Jesuits] said that the words of Jesus, too, must be weighed in their “historical context,” taking into account the culture in which Jesus lived and the human limitations of the men who wrote the Gospels. [In other words he may have said: “Whoever does X is a Y”, but he really didn’t mean that to be taken serious, say, thirty some years after he said it. Neither did John Paul II mean that Familiaris consortio should be be adhered to 30 year after he issued it. This is the Kasperite position: philosophy and theology are replaced with politics. The bottom line: There is no secure and unchanging doctrine.]
In an exchange about Church teaching on marriage and divorce, when questioned about Christ’s condemnation of adultery, Father Sosa said that “there would have to be a lot of reflection on what Jesus really said.” [Ummm… what does he think the Church has been doing for all these centuries?!? I would suggest that a lot of really smart people have reflected on precisely this point and they consistently came to the same conclusions. Until now! Suddenly these guys are smarter than our forebears.] He continued:
At that time, no one had a recorder to take down his words. What is known is that the words of Jesus must be contextualized, they are expressed in a language, in a specific setting, they are addressed to someone in particular. [Another way of saying, “We don’t have to pay any attention to the words of the Lord in Scripture.”]
Father Sosa explained that he did not meant to question the words of Jesus, [Even though that is exactly was he did.] but to suggest further examination of “the word of Jesus as we have interpreted it.” He said that his new process of discernment should be guided by the Holy Spirit. [he has a new process. Because the Holy Spirit was no where to be found in the previous 20 centuries.]
When the interviewer remarked that an individual’s discernment might lead him to a conclusion at odds with Catholic doctrine, the Jesuit superior replied: “That is so, because doctrine does not replace discernment, nor does it [replace the] Holy Spirit.”
Ladies and gentlemen, behold. The head of the Jesuits!
How the Left will coo over this, to the tinkling of ice in their high ball glasses: “Isn’t he nuanced?”
What this seems to me is: Doctrine – pfwwwwt – out the window.
Am I wrong? Please show me how this reportage and my inferences are all wrong.