From whom demons withdraw in terror and pain

The world’s quicksand is shifting under our feet.

More than ever we need the help that God sends us through the loving help of our Guardian Angels.

Yes, there are angels.  Open your Bible and, within a few pages, you’ll find angels.

From the Martyrologium Romanum (which you readers can put into perfect yet smooth and elegant English):

Memoria sanctorum Angelorum Custodum, qui, primum ad contemplandam in splendore faciem Dei vocati, a Domino etiam apud homines commissi sunt, ut iis invisibili sua, sed sollicita, praesentia adessent ac consulerent.

There are three types of persons, divine, angelic and human.  Of the three types, divine persons, the Holy Trinity One God, are uncreated.  Angelic and human are created persons.  Angels have no material component, but humans do.

Because angels are not limited by matter, or individuated in matter, and since they are purely spiritual persons, each angel is his own species. They are like in that they are angels, and unlike in that each one is particular to himself. There is, therefore, a hierarchy among the angels. But all of them always contemplate God, as angels can. They don’t have to be limited to any place, since they have no bodies. They simply are where they are in action.

So aligned are they with the will of God that when they appear in Scripture and speak, sometimes it is hard to tell when God is speaking and when they speak.

Our angel guardians can be from the anywhere in the myriads and myriads of ranks of the angels. They could be from the highest of the high or even from the lowliest little angel at the bottom of the hierarchy. But even the lowliest of the angels is beyond any human conception of mightiness. The least of the angels, were God to will or permit, could mash the cosmos into a little pea and flash the Big Bang again.

Provided that it falls within God’s will, from which it is impossible for them to stray, the material universe presents no obstacles to them. They know the essences of things directly, without having to figure them out.

Do you pray to your Guardian Angel? I sure do. I am constantly asking for help with problems and, especially, with other people. I will sometimes also ask the angelic guardians of other people to help me work something out when there is great need. And I, a weak sinner, have need all the time.

Though I loath the pastels and the foofy portrayal of these fearfully beautiful beings, I love idea behind the old pious images made for children’s bedrooms.  You see a bright yet obviously invisible angel preventing a distracted little kid from plunging off cliff as she tries to pick a pretty flower that is just out of reach.

They guide us dopey children back to a safer path.

We all all get into trouble and we all need this help.

God, who knows us better than we know ourselves, sends us mighty help before whom the fallen angels of Hell withdraw in terror and pain.

FacebookEmailPinterestGoogle GmailShare/Bookmark
Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

What Fr. Z is watching and reading

There is a movie to avoid Amen, which is – on the surface – about the Nazi Reich’s extermination of the Jews and of “unproductive” people.  A military scientist (based on a real person) who realizes what is going on – the Final Solution -and then, having a conscience, tries to stop it with the help of a young (fictional) Jesuit.

Under the surface, the movie is anti-Catholic disinformation. Actually, a lot of the anti-Catholic stuff is on the surface.

It is really creepy in some of its “good” elements.  There have to be good and truthful elements in order to lack the lies slither into your brain and start replacing facts and common sense:

  • A girl is doing math word problems.  She is asked to figure out how many middle class homes could be built for the cost of on insane asylum.   This comes right after a scene in which patients in a hospital are euthanized.
  • Archbp. von Galen, the “Lion of Münster”, marches into a government building and threatens the officials that he will expose what they are doing.  Later, he is denouncing from the pulpit what is being done to “unproductive” people.
  • There is an elaborate scene in which the principal tries to find a way to listen to Pius XII’s 1942 Christmas radio address (but it gets the text wrong).

These are intended to distract you.

Be warned: There is strong undercurrent of propaganda in it against Pius XII and the Catholic Church.  This film is based on the vile 1963 play by Rolf Hochhuth, The Deputy, a Christian Tragedy, which was a project of the KGB to attack Pius XII and the Catholic Church through “disinformation”.

The production values are fairly high, for there was clearly a lot of money behind it.  Happily, the film at a certain point becomes incoherent, ridiculously preachy in all the wrong ways.

After watching this slithery dreck I cleansed by mind and heart by watching a John Wayne movie.  Refreshing.

There are other antidotes to the disinformation dreck.

Be sure to check out Gary Krupp’s Pope Pius XII and World War II: The Documented Truth: A Compilation of International Evidence Revealing the Wartime Acts of the Vatican   There is, I believe, an early and a more recent edition of this book, which I wrote once about HERE.   The great thing about this book is it provides photographic images of primary evidence.

An important book, not only for what was purposely done to Pius XII (such as The Deputy), but also what is happening today in many circles in these USA, is by Prof. Ron Rychlak, called Disinformation: Former Spy Chief Reveals Secret Strategies for Undermining Freedom, Attacking Religion, and Promoting Terrorism co-authored with, principally, Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa.  Pacepa was the head of intelligence in Romania who fled to the West when he was asked to start killing people. He is an expert on the Soviet technique of framing, disinformation, creating false narratives and history. The book exposes the Communist background of seemingly-benign organizations and explains the treatment received by Cardinals Stepinak, Mindszenty and Wysznski and, of course, as I mentioned above, Pius XII.  More HERE.

You also want to read, for sure, Rychlak’s Hitler, The War, And The Pope.   Rychlak is a professor at Ol’ Miss who teaches in the Law School about evidence.

I also just finished reading the new book by Dick Morris called Power Grab.  This is about the efforts of the Obama Administration to create a one party nation (guess which one).  The descriptions of the way Obamacare was implemented, how the EPA works, what is being done by executive order.  It is well documented.

Finally, I am well into The Great Bridge: The Epic Story of the Building ofthe Brooklyn Bridge by David McCullough. This is a ripping good yarn about an amazing feat during an interesting transitional period of American history.  David McCullough is superb.  If you haven’t read his biography of John Adams, you have a treat in store.

I have a whole bunch of ancient Roman historical fiction novels in the queue and some more nautical, Royal Navy items as well.  I am grateful to readers who have sent Kindle books.

In any event, get Kindle, keep reading, keep learning, keep expanding yourselves.

Do you need a Kindle?  I read more now than ever.  Click HERE  UK click HERE

Posted in The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Sin That Cries To Heaven For Vengence, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Posting comments here

People who register here, and whose registrations I approve, can post comments.  I use the “about you” section to determine whether or not you are a real (and serious) person or a vile spammer or bot of some kind.  It can’t be viewed by others.

I am also – more and more, it seems – manually switching on the moderation queue for my entries here.

Some blogs have suspended their comboxes completely.  I don’t want to do that.

As we see circumstances in the world and in the Church becoming… interesting, I have seen an uptick of what I can only call “spew” in my combox.

If you call specific people “idiots” or suggest that they are possessed by the devil because of this or that, I am not going to approve comments.  That’s because you are attacking the person.  Stick to the issues.  Comment on words and deeds and their effects.   Let the spectacularly uncharitable Fishwrap or Amerika commentators cravenly hide behind internet anonymity and sink into the slime of ad hominem attacks.

I ask you to be better than they are, no matter how frustrated, angry or anxious you might be.  Sometimes I fail in charity and patience sometimes, so I know that there is a temptation from time to time to go over the top, but, be better than they.  It won’t be that hard, actually.

Over the years I have tried to provide a place where people can also “vent” a little, though I have also tried to place boundaries around the venting.

Avoid hyperbole (aka spittle-flecked nutty language, aka knuckle-headed stuff).  Exercise a little restraint in your language and tone.

 I welcome active comboxes, with many views.  I learn a lot from some of you.  It constantly amazes me how knowledgeable you readers are.  Sometimes I’ll post a question of my own or a request and – BAM! – back come great answers.   You are humorous, passionate, informative, enlightening… but… frankly, some of you are pushing me to close the combox.  Some of you, happily not many, whom I assume wish this blog well and want it to continue as it is, are not helping matters.

Some hints.

1) Think before posting.  Review what you wrote before hitting that post button.
2) I delete comments with comments on my choices to moderate comments.  I don’t care if you think that’s unfair.  That’s what I do.  I am benevolent dictator, but a dictator nonetheless.  It can’t be any other way and have an open combox.
3) If you comment on someone else’s comment, make sure the first thing you write is that persons name or handle and then include, if needful, a brief quote pertaining to your point.
4) This is not Twitter.  Save your @ thingy for tweets.  We don’t do that here.
5)  We can handle all sorts of points of view in the combox.  But don’t expect that heresy or persistent error (which isn’t always at the level of heresy) or consistent and insistent obtuseness is going to be tolerated forever.
6) Avoid both rabbit holes (stick to topics) and hyperbole.
7) Did I mention sticking to issues and not making ad hominem attacks?  If I didn’t, I’m saying it here.
8) Anonymity doesn’t mean that God and the angels – holy and fallen alike – don’t know you and what you did.  Remember the Four Last Things.
9) Examine your consciences and GO TO CONFESSION.  That’ll help you keep your eyes and heart clear when you post here.
10)  HERE


Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Leave a comment

I still want that Veyron, but this was pretty spiffy.

This is just too cool not to share.  Let’s take a couple minutes away from how the world and the Church are both flying apart at the seams and simply enjoy this.  Even if you are not really into cars (and I’m not), this is a pleasure to watch.

It is a gasoline commercial, but… not.  Real classic Ferrari models on real streets of great cities, doing their Ferrari thing.

Listen to the different sounds of the engines from different periods.

I’d turn the volume waaaaay up.

I still want that Veyron, but this was pretty spiffy.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged | 11 Comments

Thanks to and Mass for benefactors

Today I sent out some thank you notes to people who have recently sent donations.  However, a few were kicked back as undeliverable.  Not too worry.  I record everyone’s names.

Tomorrow, 2 October, Feast of the Angel Guardians, I will offer Holy Mass for all my benefactors, including those who use the donation button, who subscribe to a monthly donation, and who send items or Kindle books (I got one of those yesterday).  Also, thanks to LF for the “Juicebox”.  Very cool.  And always to KA, GS, and especially DY.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Leave a comment

Of Latin oddities

I can’t resist this one from Dr. Peters:

Lighter fare: [thanks for the homage] can bad Latin save a papacy?
by Dr. Edward Peters

I got an odd one a few days ago (okay, I get lots of odd ones, but this one kinda struck me), namely: that Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation was invalid because of mistakes he (allegedly) made in the Latin of his resignation letter. [Yes, that's odd.] My correspondent claims two medieval Church laws in support of the claim, one of which I could track down: Lucius III (reg. 1181-1185), dec. Ad audientiam, c. 11, X, de rescriptis, I, 3 (or Friedberg 20 fbo those for whom QLD citations are impenetrable).

Now, granting that Ad audientiam does attach negative canonical consequences to bad Latin, the context of that question was documents whose Latin was so bad it that raised questions of authenticity (this, of course, being a practical concern in an age of ecclesiastical forgeries). Looking lightly at some commentary on Lucius’ decretal (always fun to have an excuse to do that!), [Who doesn't turn to Lucius for light reading?] it seems that debates arose over how bad ‘bad’ needed to be before it was too bad, over what kind of bad could be ignored or rehabilitated, and so on. Interesting stuff, granted, but it’s all moot.  [In a related issue, how bad do a cardinal's arguments have to be before they can't be rehabilitated?]

When the great Gasparri [Cardinal Pietro] prepared canon law for its first codification at the beginning of the twentieth century, he had before him, among other things, the whole of Gregory IX’s decretal law (which contained Lucius’ letter on bad Latin along with nearly 2,000 other provisions on nearly 200 other canonical topics). And guess what?Ad audientiam did not make it into the 1917 Code, although almost every other norm de rescriptis did, in some form or another, get carried into codified law. Nor was Ad audientiam resurrected for the 1983 Code.

What the 1983 Code does say, as did the 1917 Code, is this: “Only those laws must be considered invalidating … which expressly state that an act is null …” (c. 11). Because no canon of the 1983 Code, under which Benedict XVI submitted his resignation (c. 332 § 2), addresses the quality of the Latin used in papal documents, let alone does any canon make the Latinity of papal documents go to their validity, I say, odd question answered: bad Latin does mean that one must remain pope. [Whew!  Otherwise we might be in serious trouble in a few more years.]

PS: Now that we’re thinking about it, winking at bad Latin (assuming btw that Benedict’s was bad Latin, I wish I could write it as well!) probably makes sense these days. Consider: when the 1983 Code came out, it was marred by more than 100 typographical errors. I would hate to think we’ve all been spinning our canonical wheels since then!

PPS: Don’t even ask about mistakes on the Vatican website.  [Pretty awful.  I recently had to do some proofreading for some Latin Church documents for a book and... sheesh.   They sometimes scan, you see, with OCR and the people posting the texts don't know Latin and/or don't proof read.]

There are all sorts of funny stories out there about clerics and their lack of Latin.  My favorite is about the simple country priest who walked out to meet the bishop who was riding out on the appointed day for a parish visitation.  As the parish priest drew close to the bishop and the rest of his retinue, to the astonishment of all, Father, after greeting the bishop bowed low to the bishop’s horse.   “Why, Father,” quoth the bishop, are you bowing to my horse?”  The priest, momentarily flummoxed, responded “Your Grace, do we not say every day during Holy Mass, ‘equum et salutare‘?”


Yes, folks, be sure to tip your waitresses.  I’m at HaHa’s in Cleveland next week.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , , | 14 Comments

Pre-Order until 7 October 25% off – Book in defense of marriage, tradition

Click to PRE-ORDER

UPDATE: It looks like the release date is now changed to 7 October.  THEREFORE, you can still PRE-ORDER this book for 25%.  Again, the book is to be released on 7 October.  That’s when pre-order ends. Click NOW! 

Also available now in the UK! HERE


The new book, Remaining in the Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church contains five essays of cardinals, of the archbishop secretary of the Vatican congregation for the Oriental Churches, and of three scholars on the ideas supported by Walter Card. Kasper in the opening discourse of the consistory in February 2014.

These are the nine chapters of the book:

  • The Argument in Brief- Robert Dodaro, O.S.A.
  • Dominical Teaching on Divorce and Remarriage: The Biblical Data - Paul Mankowski, S.J.
  • Divorce and Remarriage in the Early Church: Some Historical and Cultural Reflections - John M. Rist
  • Separation, Divorce, Dissolution of the Bond, and Remarriage: Theological and Practical Approaches of the Orthodox Churches - Archbishop Cyril Vasil’, S.J.
  • Unity and Indissolubility of Marriage: From the Middle Ages to the Council of Trent - Walter Cardinal Brandmüller
  • Testimony to the Power of Grace: On the Indissolubility of Marriage and the Debate concerning the Civilly Remarried and the Sacraments - Gerhard Ludwig Cardinal Müller
  • Sacramental Ontology and the Indissolubility of Marriage - Carlo Cardinal Caffarra
  • The Divorced and Civilly Remarried and the Sacraments of the Eucharist and Penance  - Velasio Cardinal De Paolis, C.S.
  • The Canonical Nullity of the Marriage Process as the Search for the Truth - Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke

The Augustinian Robert Dodaro, the editor of the book, is head of the patristic institute “Augustinianum” in Roma. The Jesuit Paul Mankowski is a professor at the Lumen Christi Institute in Chicago. Professor John M. Rist teaches ancient history and philosophy at the University of Toronto and at the Catholic University of America in Washington.

______ORIGINAL POST Jul 29, 2014

There is a book of great importance about to emerge.  It is available for PRE-ORDER at a substantial discount.  It will come out in October 2014, timed for the upcoming Synod of Bishops, which will tackle – inter alia – Communion for the divorced and civilly remarried.


(Don’t hesitate, just click.  The UK link is HERE. Kindle is coming, I hope.)

I know quite a bit about this book, as it turns out.  The “five Cardinals” mentioned in the blurb, below, are going to please you when their names are revealed.  The other scholars involved are also top-notch.

The book will eventually be out in several languages.  It won’t be an easy read for some people, since a couple of the essays really drill into primary sources.  Do NOT let that discourage.  Punch above your weight, as they say.  You can do it.

YOUR TASK, however, is to pre-order this book NOW.  Make sure that Ignatius has a good response so they can have a big printing and wide distribution.

Here is the blurb:

In this volume five Cardinals of the Church, and four other scholars, respond to the call issued by Cardinal Walter Kasper for the Church to harmonize “fidelity and mercy in its pastoral practice with civilly remarried, divorced people”.

Beginning with a concise introduction, the first part of the book is dedicated to the primary biblical texts pertaining to divorce and remarriage, and the second part is an examination of the teaching and practice prevalent in the early Church. In neither of these cases, biblical or patristic, do these scholars find support for the kind of “toleration” of civil marriages following divorce advocated by Cardinal Kasper. This book also examines the Eastern Orthodox practice of oikonomia (understood as “mercy” implying “toleration”) in cases of remarriage after divorce and in the context of the vexed question of Eucharistic communion. It traces the centuries long history of Catholic resistance to this convention, revealing serious theological and canonical difficulties inherent in past and current Orthodox Church practice.

Thus, in the second part of the book, the authors argue in favor of retaining the theological and canonical rationale for the intrinsic connection between traditional Catholic doctrine and sacramental discipline concerning marriage and communion.

The various studies in this book lead to the conclusion that the Church’s longstanding fidelity to the truth of marriage constitutes the irrevocable foundation of its merciful and loving response to the individual who is civilly divorced and remarried. The book therefore challenges the premise that traditional Catholic doctrine and contemporary pastoral practice are in contradiction.  [Remember: Liberals will say to us who defend tradition that we are conducting a war on mercy.]

“Because it is the task of the apostolic ministry to ensure that the Church remains in the truth of Christ and to lead her ever more deeply into that truth, pastors must promote the sense of faith in all the faithful, examine and authoritatively judge the genuineness of its expressions and educate the faithful in an ever more mature evangelical discernment.”
- St. John Paul II, Familiaris Consortio

Start ordering.  Order and then order some more.  When this book comes out, we want a torrent of copies absolutely everywhere.  You can bet that those who want to overturn our teaching and practice will be as active as little termites, chewing away at our foundations.  Don’t let them.  Get good information into as many hands as possible.

Trust me.

Buy in UK HERE

UPDATE 29 Sept:

I saw a pretty good blurb about the book HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Be The Maquis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Semper Paratus, The Drill, ¡Hagan lío! | Tagged , , | 61 Comments

I am not making up this coffee flavor!

Okay… I just had to post this.

I saw at Mystic Monk that there is now a flavored coffee (if you are into that sort of thing) called… and I am not making this up…

Snickering Monk Candy Bar.

Click HERE

And don’t forget the seasonal Pumpkin Spice and their now widely sough Monk Shots! They may be billed as “single serve” but some of you readers have written that they get more from each one, since they seem to have more coffee in them than other K-Cups.

Refresh your coffee supply now with Mystic Monk Coffee and help the Wyoming Carmelites build their new monastic complex!

Besides, it’s swell!


Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Scratching my head about the bishop in Paraguay

I will be the first to admit that what we do not know about this case, could fill volumes.  However, there are a few curiosities that leave me scratching my head.

Here is a story form CWN about the Paraguayan bishop recently relieved of his mandate by Pope Francis.

Keep in mind that while the Supreme Pontiff exercises full jurisdiction in the Church and that his decisions have no appeal, should the Supreme Pontiff want there to be sound rule of law through the Church at every level, he, too, will observe the laws of which he is the Legislator.  So, the removal of bishops by the Pope should have some canonical basis.  It doesn’t have to, technically, but it really should.

Let’s have a look:

Bishop Rogelio Ricardo Livieres Plano, [Argentinian, by the way, and Opus Dei] who was removed from his post in Paraguay, has issued a bitter complaint, charging that other bishops conspired against him [which is plausible] and saying that Pope Francis “must answer to God” for his removal.  [Which is true.  We all must answer to God for all that we do or fail to do that we ought.]

The deposed bishop, in a letter to Cardinal Marc Ouellet, the prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, said that he was being “persecuted” for his orthodoxy, [!] and complained that he had not been given an opportunity to defend himself.

The bishop’s letter, which was leaked to the media in Paraguay, [who knows by whom] said that the action against him was “unfounded and arbitrary.” He angrily charged that although Pope Francis has spoken often about “dialogue, mercy, openness, decentralization, and respect for authority of the local churches,” he did not give Bishop Livieres a chance to “clarify any doubts” about his ministry. [In my discussions with Argentinians recently, I have come to learned, from explanations made by the same Argentinians, that their dialogue tends to be blunt even to the point of rancorous.]

Father Federico Lombardi, the director of the Vatican press office, observed that the bishop’s letter was “a very violent reaction.” He remarked to reporters: “Maybe it is easier to understand why there was a problem.” [No.  That actually doesn't help at all.  "Blunt speech" and "voicing an opinion" are not a canonical basis for removal from office unless the opinion is obviously heresy.]

Father Lombardi had earlier said that Bishop Livieres had been removed from office because of his discordant relations with the other bishops of Paraguay. [Again, how is "not getting along with others" a canonical basis for removal from office?] Most observers have agreed that the case pivoted on the bishop’s decision to promote a priest who had been characterized by an American diocese (Scranton, Pennsylvania) as a danger to children. [And yet Fr. Lombardi clarified the other day that the case of the Vicar General was not a major element in the decision!  So, which is it?  By the way, that choice for VG was really a bad move.  No question.  What was he thinking?]

I am left with some questions, but it is unlikely that we will get answers.  I am not sure we need answers.  However, since some answers that don’t add up are being offered, I am left scratching my head.

Don’t get me wrong.  I don’t have a problem with the removal of bishops who are a disaster.  It may be that removal of this bishop was surely founded on canonical grounds and for good reasons.  But when the reasons given publicly don’t add up very well, I start to wonder what’s really going on.  Removal of a bishop is a serious event.  It should make everyone stop and think about their own conduct in their own state of life.

This is an “examine your conscience” moment for all of us.

Oh… and another thing.  This Argentinian bishop serving in Paraguay will be criticized by liberals for fighting back.  But those same liberals praised the Bishop of Toowoomba in Australia for getting all feisty.   He, you see, was “prophetic”, but the Paraguayan must be an “ideologue”.

Moderation queue is ON.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , | 25 Comments

Kneeless in Seattle

St. Margaret beating the Devil with a hammer. A bit fuzzy…but hey!

From Fr. Carota’s blog:

I received this text message yesterday (Sunday) from a young man who is a member of “Juventutem” and had to go to Seattle for work.   When he went to mass there, this is what happened:

“In the Seattle Cathedral I was just denied communion kneeling and made a scene of.  He eventually, after a minute standoff scoffed, said I ought to learn obedience, and then threw the Sacred Host sideways into my mouth.”

“For every knee shall be bowed to me, and every tongue shall swear.” Isaiah 45:24

“That in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth:”  Philippians 2: 10.

Very ironically, the exact above reading (from St. Paul to the Philippians) was read at the Novus Ordo Mass this young man went to where he was spiritually abuse by the priest.   St. Paul is saying we need to kneel at only the name of Jesus.  What does that mean we need to do in front of the the presence of Jesus in Holy Communion which is a billion times more holy than on His Name.

God compelled the devil to show himself to the Desert Father Abba Apollo.  He was ugly, black, skinny limbs and had NO KNEES to adore God on.  Pope Benedict said: “The inability to kneel is seen as the very essence of the diabolical”.


That priest didn’t get the memo.

Redemptionis Sacramentum states:

[91.] In distributing Holy Communion it is to be remembered that “sacred ministers may not deny the sacraments to those who seek them in a reasonable manner, are rightly disposed, and are not prohibited by law from receiving them”. Hence any baptized Catholic who is not prevented by law must be admitted to Holy Communion. Therefore, it is not licit to deny Holy Communion to any of Christ’s faithful solely on the grounds, for example, that the person wishes to receive the Eucharist kneeling or standing.

Posted in Be The Maquis, Cri de Coeur, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , | 78 Comments