Archbp. Burke on the Motu Proprio
One of WDTPRS’s favorites, His Excellency Most Reverend Raymond Burke, Archbishop of St. Louis, has a statement about Summorum Pontificum. It was published on website of the Archdiocese. I edted out the section on Natural Family Planning.
Count on clarity of language, proper use of terms, and warm sympathy for the topic.
My emphases and comments.
Be not afraid!
Two forms of the Rite of the Mass
by Archbishop Raymond L. Burke
Introduction: Two different but related subjects
In writing to you this week, I want to address two different but related subjects of concern to us all. The first is the recent publication of new liturgical norms pertaining to the celebration of two forms of the Rite of the Mass, the form used by all until 1970 and the new form introduced by Pope Paul VI. The new norms, given by Pope Benedict XVI on July 7, have been the subject of much discussion in the media. For your better understanding of the new norms, I want to offer you my reflections on the norms and their implementation in the Archdiocese of St. Louis.
...
Two forms of the one Rite of the Mass
By his apostolic letter "Summorum Pontificum," Pope Benedict XVI has provided for the easier use of the form of the Rite of the Mass until 1970, which was published by Blessed Pope John XXIII in 1962, in addition to the use of the Rite of the Mass, which was published by Pope Paul VI in 1970 and with which we are all quite familiar. The first form is sometimes popularly called the Tridentine Rite of the Mass, referring to the fact that, in its essentials, it remained the same from the time of the reforms introduced by the Council of Trent (Tridentine is the adjective for Trent). Changes were introduced into the rite over the centuries, including the changes made in the 1962 edition of the Roman Missal, but the greater part of the rite remained unchanged.
The second form is called the Novus Ordo or New Order of the Mass. It also retains the essential elements found in the Tridentine Rite but introduces a somewhat radical simplification of the rite. It is, however, one and the same Rite of the Mass.
With the norms promulgated by Pope Benedict XVI, the Novus Ordo remains the ordinary form in which the Rite of the Mass is to be celebrated. The Order of the Mass in force before the changes introduced by the Novus Ordo is now the extraordinary form, which may be celebrated by any priest, without special permission, under the conditions set forth by the Holy Father. [Yes, this is a good distinction: "conditions set forth by the Holy Father". Some chanceries seem to be soft peddling this, giving the impression that the conditions are laid down by the local bishop.] In establishing the extraordinary form of the Rite of the Mass, our Holy Father reminds us that, in fact, the use of the Roman Missal of Blessed Pope John XXIII "was never juridically abrogated and, consequently, in principle, was always permitted" (Letter of Pope Benedict XVI Accompanying the Apostolic Letter Summorum Pontificum, July 7, 2007, paragraph 6).
As he observes, there was a greater attachment to the former rite than perhaps was anticipated, [Again, this is from a bishop with a solid record of being open and generous about the older form. When you view the issue through positive lenses, you see the issues differently.] especially among the faithful "with a notable liturgical formation and a deep, personal familiarity with the earlier form of the liturgical celebration" (Ibid.). [Again, a good distinction. Many critics of the older form hint that the people who want it are really not very sophisticated.] An interest in and attachment to the former Rite of the Mass also developed among the faithful in circumstances in which the reforms of the Novus Ordo were not implemented with fidelity but were falsely seen to permit or even require a creative interpretation on the part of the priest. [This underscores how much depends on him.] Such circumstances, in the words of Pope Benedict XVI, "led to deformations of the liturgy which were hard to bear" (Ibid.). Our Holy Father reflects upon his own experience of the confusion and hurt which sometimes accompanied the implementation of the Novus Ordo.
Not infrequently, I meet young people who are attracted to the former Order of the Mass, even though they had no experience of it when they were growing up. [But…but… but… wait a minute, Your Excellency!! I have heard again and again that only OLD people want the older Mass, out of nostalgia! You mean, YOUNG people want it too? Seriously, I am so glad that His Excellency mentions this. When you go to places where the older Mass is celebrated you notice right away all the young people, young families with lots of children.] What attracts them is the beauty and reverence, which the earlier form very much fosters. Such beauty and reverence should also be evident in the celebration of the Novus Ordo. Because the ordinary form is greatly simplified, the priest and those who assist him must be attentive to the divine action taking place and not give way to an informality and familiarity which is offensive to the nature of the Sacred Liturgy. [HURRAY!]
Through "Summorum Pontificum," Pope Benedict XVI makes the former Order of the Mass more available to the faithful who are attached to it. At the same time, he maintains the Novus Ordo as the ordinary form of the celebration of the Mass. It is the expressed hope of our Holy Father that the use of the extraordinary form will support the faithful celebration of the Mass according to the Novus Ordo. [Yes. Remember the issue of cross-pollination I have spoken of so many times here at WDTPRS.]
Implementation of the new norms in the archdiocese
Some of the faithful of the archdiocese have expressed the fears that the use of the vernacular in the celebration of the Mass will be taken away and that the use of the extraordinary form of the Mass will be imposed upon them, while they, in fact, are attached to the ordinary form. Both fears are unfounded. The celebration of the extraordinary form in parishes must be requested by a group of the faithful and is to be scheduled in such a way as to permit the other faithful the use of the ordinary form. Priests, when they celebrate the Mass without a congregation, that is, when they are on vacation or away from a parochial assignment, may choose either form. Members of the faithful can, of course, assist at the Mass, no matter in which form it is celebrated.
At present, the Archdiocese of St. Louis has a most effective apostolate [I think we could say "model" apostolate.] on behalf of the faithful who are attached to the extraordinary form of the Rite of the Mass, that is the Roman Missal of Blessed Pope John XXIII. St. Francis de Sales Oratory is the center of the apostolate and serves well the faithful who desire the celebration of the Mass and of the other sacraments according to the rites which were in force in 1962. The Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem also provide Sunday and holy day Masses at the Chapel of the Passionist Nuns in Ellisville. In addition, the Canons Regular, as befits their form of religious life, celebrate daily and publicly the Liturgy of the Hours in the chapel of their Priory in Chesterfield.
If additional requests of the regular celebration of the extraordinary form of the Rite of the Mass are received, I will work with the parish priests in responding appropriately and generously to the requests. Also, courses of liturgical formation [!] pertaining to the Roman Missal of Blessed Pope John XXIII will be provided for priests who desire it. The seminarians at Kenrick-Glennon Seminary will be provided the liturgical formation necessary to celebrate the Mass according to the extraordinary form. [ o{]:¬) ] Their studies of Latin will also give attention to the texts of the extraordinary form. [What a blessing Archbp. Burke is. I wonder if there is someway he could, well…. be given a few more dioceses?]
Gratitude for the richness of the forms of the Sacred Liturgy
In concluding my brief reflections on "Summorum Pontificum," I express, in the name of us all, deepest gratitude to Pope Benedict XVI for providing so richly and well for the worthy and beautiful celebration of the Sacred Liturgy, especially the Holy Mass. With Pope Benedict XVI, I am certain that the richer possibilities for the celebration of the Mass and the other sacraments will lead us all to a deeper appreciation of the immeasurable love of God for us and to a deeper response of love, on our part.






































Be not afraid!
Not infrequently, I meet young people who are attracted to the former Order of the Mass, even though they had no experience of it when they were growing up. [But…but… but… wait a minute, Your Excellency!! I have heard again and again that only
Fr. did you get my email on this? I just wanted to make sure it went through.
Comment by thetimman — 20 July 2007 @ 4:09 pmAn amazing man and a faithful shepherd, please God send us more Bishops like him!
I wonder how well does the Pope know of Archbishop Burke? I don’t know how the appointment of Bishops work, but if the Pope would consult Archbishop Burke on who to appoint as Bishops in this country…well I think things would improve dramatically.
I especially loved the part about the formation of seminarians in latin and the extraordinary use!! I’ve been waiting for word about how the MP will effect seminaries, and it looks like at least one seminary will be substantially effected by it!
Let us pray for Archbishop Burke (as he has some substantial enemies) and let us pray for more Bishops like him!
Comment by Brian — 20 July 2007 @ 4:17 pmWhy is Burke not a Cardinal yet???
Comment by Michael — 20 July 2007 @ 4:19 pmHis Excellency Most Reverend Raymond Burke is such a blessing for us and the whole Church. More, he provides his brother bishops with an excellent example of how to be a bishop. Hopefully, more bishops will follow the example Archbishop Burke is setting. Truly, I wish he could have been sent to my diocese instead of St. Louis. Since that is no longer an option, I am applying for internship positions in St. Luis. The change of scenery will do my soul good.
Comment by Robert — 20 July 2007 @ 4:20 pmHopefully to Cardinal Burke and then maybe the next Pope Burke!
I am also so thankful to this great bishop for his backing of a cause in which I’ve been involved. Once again, we wait on the bishops to move while certain great ones go ahead and actually do something to benefit the faithful:
http://www.ourladyofamerica.com/pdf/OpinionLetter-May-2007.pdf
More info here by Fatima’s Fr. Fox of the Immaculate Heart Messenger:
http://www.oltiv.org/images/May2007Article.pdf
Thank you so much, Bishop Burke for your faithfulness.
Comment by Kris — 20 July 2007 @ 4:41 pmAfter reading this, I am slightly annoyed. All these dioceses are sounding off for good and for bad towards the letter, but my own only had a snippet in the paper last week saying that His Excellency and his liturgist were studying the issue and that they would have directives by the time the letter comes into effect in September…
Hardly words to inspire the faithful…
Comment by Jacob — 20 July 2007 @ 4:45 pmArchbishop Burke will probably not be made a cardinal in St. Louis. Even though it is an old archdiocese it is very small (575,000) smaller even than many dioceses. I have heard there will no longer be cardinals in St. Louis…except for the baseball team.
Rumor has it Archbishop Burke may end up in Chicago in a few years…of course, as a cardinal. The Archdiocese of Chicago needs a man like him to fix it up. The seminary is very good now, but the parishes are still deeply troubled.
Comment by Different — 20 July 2007 @ 4:59 pmmethinks he would still make many changes at Mundelein, were His Excellnency to become the Eminent Abp. of Chicago!
Comment by Sacerdos in Aeternum — 20 July 2007 @ 5:09 pmSome of the faithful of the archdiocese have expressed the fears that the use of the vernacular in the celebration of the Mass will be taken away
I hope that we will see more Latin used in the ordinary form of the Mass (thanks to cross-pollination and a growing appreciation of what the Second Vatican Council asked for), but it could also back-fire. I can just hear it: “We’re a Vatican II parish. If you want Latin, you should go to St. Senilis—they use the pre-Vatican II Mass over there.”
Comment by Greg Smisek — 20 July 2007 @ 5:36 pmIt is true about the attraction of younger people to the Extraordinary form. The Benedictines of Mary Queen of Apostles professed vows in our Basilica and it was wonderful to see the Church full of young families!
Comment by Pater, OSB — 20 July 2007 @ 6:10 pmPater, OSB
Chicago will do just fine without Archbishop Burke. He should be sent instead out here to Los Angeles, where real change is needed. Or perhaps better yet, New York or Washington. I would also like to see Archbishop Chaput in a higher visibility diocese such as LA, New York or Washington, DC.
Comment by Dan — 20 July 2007 @ 6:11 pmFollowing up on Greg Smisek’s comment, there are some parishes, like, unfortunately, mine, where the silliness is so cherished that it is unimaginable that the parish would take any cues from the extraordinary form of the Mass. But nevertheless I think the traditional Latin Mass is definitely going to have a substantial positive impact on ordinary rite. I am encouraged by the response to the motu proprio so far. Sure, some bishops predictably have been less than generous in their response. But overall the immediate fruit has been more substantial than I would have predicted—in a number of dioceses traditional Latin Masses already are being added and there has been a ton of commentary, much of it positive. It seems to me to be quite plausible to expect that as more people assist at the traditional Latin Mass, which is now officially destigmatized, they are going bring home what they see to their so-called Vatican II parishes.
Comment by Dan — 20 July 2007 @ 6:22 pmThat seems to be in contrast to how the Motu Proprio is being viewed in Miami
Comment by Luis — 20 July 2007 @ 6:30 pm“Father Hogan noted, however, that the pope?s document clearly states that the Tridentine Mass is an ?extraordinary form of the Roman liturgy. The ordinary Mass is the one that we have been celebrating? since 1970. The difference between the two Masses is more than linguistic, said Father Hogan, who is also rector of St. Mary Cathedral. The Tridentine Mass is basically a private Mass of the priest where people attend but participate minimally, he said. It was intended to be a private Mass (where) a priest acted in the name of the people. Most of us have grown up with the form where we participate more, with the music and the ministries,? Father Hogan said.”
The full article is available
http://www.miamiarch.org/ip.asp?op=H1000070720E&kw=tridentine
Father Hogan’s Explanatory letter to the priests of the Archdiocese
http://www.miamiarchdiocese.org/Atimo_s/news/TridentinePDF2.pdf
Hello all!
I have a question. If there is a group of faithful who want the the use of the Missal of Blessed John XXIII on Sunday, must the pastor still ask permission from the bishop? This is what the good bishops seems to be saying.
However, I thought it was up to the pastor? Then, of course, if there were problems in saying it, the pastor could call on the bishop for help? Didn’t the Holy Father say this in his MP? Am I wrong?
Comment by Giovanni — 20 July 2007 @ 6:47 pmI think, regarding the cross polination issue, that the new English translation will also have an enormous
Comment by Rob — 20 July 2007 @ 7:21 pmeffect when it hits the parish level. Hopefully, the new English translation (which they cannot avoid—the
extraordinary usage for now is something that they can try to ignore) will make some of the more conservative
Novus Ordo Catholics want to take a look at where these changes are coming from.
Archbishop Burke is one extraordinary ‘Ordinary’. Fr. Hardon recognized his strength and holiness some years back by asking him to oversee his Marian Catechist program.
And, of course, someone else saw his potential and he was made a bishop. He is certainly one of the brightest lights in the episcopate in the United States. May God grant us more like him!
Yes, I would love to vote for him as a Cardinal if I had a vote!
Comment by Ave Maria — 20 July 2007 @ 7:21 pmIt is encouraging to see such a positive response to the MP. It is also significant that so many bishops are taking notice of it (even if they seek, in some cases, to diffuse its impact). I wonder how many bishops even made public comment on Ecclesia Dei Afflicta when it came out. The tendency was probably to ignore it and hope it would be a dead letter.
Comment by Anthony English — 20 July 2007 @ 7:44 pm“What a blessing Archbp. Burke is. I wonder if there is someway he could, well…. be given a few more dioceses?”
Send him to L.A.
Give him a firehose and demolition charges.
On second thought, however, I would hate to see St. Louis deprived of him.
A great letter from a great bishop.
Comment by Richard — 20 July 2007 @ 7:51 pmAbp Burke can certainly be made a Cardinal in Detroit should he be appointed when Cardinal Maida is granted his request for retirement (I think going on close to two years now).
Comment by