o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail
LOGIN


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • The future and our choices
  • Papal ad orientem alert!
  • More on Charbel Vestments
  • More from dissident NCRep on Bougeois's excommunication
  • I was sad before... I am irritated now
  • Alignment of dates: New Prefect of CDWDS?
  • A very sad Fr. Z and the promise of a Mass
  • Alaskans, take note!

  • Recent Comments:

    • GOR: Well done, Father - highlighting Truth versus falsehood, Faith versus feelings and a right-ordered conscience...
    • Joe of St. ThĂ©rèse: This is great! I hope even more Ad Orientem will be celebrated outside the Papal...
    • David: Father, could you please comment on Sledgehammer’s question above? I’m very curious about this. To...
    • Memphis Aggie: What I wonder is where’s the struggle with conscience when it comes to vows of obedience? Vows...
    • Bob Glassmeyer: Some time back I read a lovely article about a man who was preparing to make his solemn profession in...
    • Jacob: O’Brien’s most salient point was that for those /inside/ of history, it would all seem quite...
    • Stephen: We have already seen a renewal of youth gravitating towards, or supporting, Communism again (youth in...
    • Jenny Z: I wrote about this in my private blog just yesterday. Alot of us feel something big brewing, something Not...
    • Jason Keener: This article underscores the deep problem of relativism and the weak reasoning skills of many people,...
    • Subvet: My own thinking had lately gone down the same path. I get doubts about it because hey, I’m just a...

  • VOTE!
    My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!

    Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar



    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!






















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner


    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
    • No events.
  • 28 May 2008

    Reviewing WDTPRS bullet points

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:50 am

    Over time I have developed some ideas which guide most of what I post here regarding liturgy, liturgical translation, use of the older form of Mass, etc.

    Let’s review some of the aphorisms and basic starting points I use here which are like helpful pegs upon which we can organize our thoughts when talking to people.

    Think of a tool shop, where you see pegs on the wall with the shape of the tool that belongs their painted around the beg. 

    Liturgy is the tip of the spear

    There is a reciprocal relationship between how we pray and what we believe.  Change our prayer, we change our understanding of doctrine.  At the same time, if you believe a certain thing, that will affect how you pray.  Our identity begins to shift.  The Latin phrase lex orandi lex credendi expresses this… the "law of praying is the law of believing". 

    The older Mass exerts a "gravitational pull"

    Use the image of gravity or "cross-pollination", "harmonic resonance", whatever.

    The use of the older form of Mass will exert an influence on the way the newer form of Mass is being celebrated.  First, younger priests (and older too) will discover new dimensions to Holy Mass by learning or refreshing the older form.  This will change their self perception and how they say Mass.  In turn, this will influence how people in the pews see them and understand Holy Mass.  Since the Eucharist (Its celebration and the Sacrament Itself) is the "source and summit" of our Christian life, identity, mores, etc., everything about our Church will begin to shift because of these changes of self-perception.

    Say The Black Do The Red

    The "Black" means the texts written in black ink on the pages of liturgical books.  The "Red" means the rubrics which explain the actions to be done.

    Our sacred rites have their own interior force and power.  Remember that the true Actor in every Mass is the High Priest Jesus Christ.  He speak in every word.  He acts in every gesture. 

    By our baptism, we have a share in Christ’s priesthood.  Thus, when we united our heart, mind and will with the sacred action, He takes our voices and hands and makes them his own, each according to our proper role.  The priest acts as Christ, Head of the Body.  The congregation is His Body in union with the Head. 

    When we simply do what the Church asks and provides in our sacred rites, Christ is more easily discerned, His graces are more easily mediated, His voice and teaching more clearly heard. 

    We must get ourselves out of the way and simply do what Holy Church asks and offers. 

    Save The Liturgy Save The World

    The Eucharist, its celebration and itself as the extraordinary Sacrament, is the “source and summit of Christian life”. 

    If we really believe that, then we must also hold that what we do in church, what we believe happens in a church, makes an enormous difference.

    Do we believe the consecration really does something? Or, do we believe what is said and how, what the gestures are and the attitude in which they made are entirely indifferent? For example, will a choice not to kneel before Christ the King and Judge truly present in each sacred Host, produce a wider effect?

    If you throw a stone, even a pebble, into a pool it produces ripples which expand to its edge. The way we celebrate Mass must create spiritual ripples in the Church and the world.

    So does our good or bad reception of Holy Communion.

    So must violations of rubrics and irreverence. 

    Mass is not merely a “teaching moment” or a “celebration of unity” or a "tedious obligation". Our choice of music, architecture, ceremonies and language affect more than one small congregation in one building. We are interconnected in both our common human nature and in baptism. When we sin we hurt the whole Body of Christ the Church.

    If that is true for sin, it must also be true for our liturgical choices. They must also have personal and corporate impact. Any Mass can be offered for the intentions of the living or the dead.

    Not even death is an obstacle to the efficacy of Holy Mass.   We offer Mass for the living and the dead.

    Celebrate Mass well, participate properly – affect the whole world. Celebrate poorly – affect the whole world.   This is another reason why we must Say The Black and Do the Red.

    Already but not yet

    Christ died and rose again.  Thus our humanity, taken by Christ into an indestructible bond with His divinity, died, rose and ascended to the Father’s right hand.

    Christ’s work is complete.  But its fullness has not yet been realized.

    In this world, in our Church, in our lives, we are "already" enjoying the first fruits of Christ’s redemptive work.  But we have not received the fullness of what Christ has done.

    Even the Eucharist is a foretaste of what is promised to us.

    But we obscure the promise and place obstacles before what Christ offers us in the Church, in the liturgy, etc., when we places ourselves, our self-centered designs, in the way. 

    We must get out of Christ’s way, so that His will may be brought to fruition.

    We are already "there", but we still have a long way to go. 

    The stakes are very high indeed.  What we do here is very important. 

    We are dealing with choices questions of life and death for ourselves and our children.

    Ad intra et ad extra

    When we consider large questions about the Church and who we are as Catholics, it is useful to make distinctions about who we are in ourselves and who we are in the world. 

    Catholics, Christians, are both of in the world and yet not part of the world, removed.  We are living in a state of "already but not yet".  What we have here in the Church is a foretaste of the world to come. 

    But it is Christ’s will that Holy Church shape the world. 

    It is especially the role of Christian Catholic laymen to shape the large world.  For this lay people need clergy to do their jobs, according to their vocations, to shape them and their identity, to sanctify, teach and govern them, so that Christ can act through their words and actions in the world. 

    So we must consider who we are as Catholics, within our Church, as ourselves, in relation with Christ the Lord.  This is the ad intra angle.  Then we also must consider who we are in the world around us, what our role is in the world we influence.  This is the ad extra dimension

    This can be applied, for example, in the liturgical choice we make?  What does doing X mean to ourselves as worshiping Catholics?  What does it say to the world?  When the College of Cardinals meets in conclave to choose a Pope, they must consider the man they choose in light of the Church’s needs in Herself and also how the Church interfaces with the world now and in the future.  Ad intra et ad extra.  This is not a chronological distinction but rather a logical distinction, helpful merely to get our thinking and planning organized.

    Pope Benedict has a "Marshall Plan" 

    After World War II Europe was devastated.  That devastation made it more likely that the enemies of humanity promoting Communism would find a good foothold.  Also, Europe was in no position to engage in useful trade.  More importantly, people were suffering.  So the United States began to help rebuild Europe.

    After Vatican II there has been terrible devastation of the Church.  This is not so much because of the texts issued by the Council but because of the lack of correct reading of those texts, the ideological designs (sometimes malicious) of some few who had great influence in the Council’s implementation, and a deadly reversal of the logical priority which the Church must be given in the ongoing interchange between the Church and the world. 

    In short, Catholics have by and large lost their identity because of the general rupture created in nearly every aspect of our experience of worship, education, devotions, etc. 

    Because Catholics lost their identity, we have little or no influence in the public square.  Thus, Catholics are easier targets for bigotry or persecution or simple apathy.  We are more easily marginalized from public debate, pushed out of the square and given no voice.  Sadly, many "Catholics" then compromise Catholic teaching on faith and morals, violate the Church’s laws, for the sake of gaining influence in the public square.  Think of some Catholic politicians and even some clergy.

    Pope Benedict’s plan is to reinvigorate Catholic identity from within the Church (ad intra) especially through our liturgical experience so that we can begin to claim our rightful role in the public square (ad extra), precisely as Catholics. 

    If we don’t know who we are, what we think and believe, can’t explain our position, then what could be possibly have to say to the world around us?

    Saying the black and doing the red has a wider influence on the whole world, not just on ourselves in an enclosed Catholic ghetto.  Liturgy is therefore our crow bar, the tip of the spear.  It is the force which draws everything nearer to Christ.

    This is why Summorum Pontificum is so very important.  It reaches far beyond the desires of some people for older forms of liturgy.

    This is why must have good translations for our vernacular Novus Ordo liturgy as well.  The vernacular Novus Ordo is here to stay for the long-term, whatever your desires to the contrary may be. 

    Therefore, we need to have translations which reflect accurately and beautifully what the prayers really say.  They will shape Catholics from within and then Catholics shape the world according to how they pray and believe.   The prayers themselves begin to draw all things to Christ.


    • • • • • •

    13 Comments

    1. Thank you Father.

      I was skeptical at first about this subject thinking that the concern over the liturgy was bordering on legalism. However, after seeing the real abuses, reading about the Pope’s work, reading sites like Father Longenecker’s and changing my own practice (receiving on the tongue, not the hand) I’m convinced.

      An elevated liturgy helps maintain the sense of awe and gratitude for the Eucharist. I need my sense of reverence to be sustained and nourished, not just by the Host, but by the liturgy as well. Keep up the good work Father and thanks for the review.

      Comment by Memphis Aggie — 28 May 2008 @ 10:53 am
    2. Another possibility (tongue-in cheek!!)

      The Rubrics Match the Rhetoric

      I feel it easier to appreciate the doctrine of the Real Presence in the TLM than in the (often poorly celebrated) Novus Ordo. The rubrics of the TLM show so much reverence to the Blessed Sacrament that they inspire reverence also in the congregation. If only the rubrics of the Novus Ordo mass were followed as carefully!

      Comment by Paul — 28 May 2008 @ 10:54 am
    3. Speaking of the new translations, there are currently several articles on the website of America magazine that look quite interesting. One of them deals with the coming translations (“A New Roman Missal”), another with symbolism in the liturgy (“More Than Words”) and yet another with the deficiencies of the reform (“Return to Our Roots”).

      I don’t have a subscription, so I can’t read them, but I hope, Fr. Zuhlsdorf, that you might to be willing to provide some future commentary on at least one of them? I think you’ve commented on articles in America in the past, though I don’t know whether you’ve since let your subscription lapse. I’m quite aware that you’re a man hard-pressed for time, so under no circumstances should my request be interpreted as anything like a demand. Hopefully, there might be someone else willing to help in case you’re simply unable. Thank you.

      Good, valuable principles to remember, above. I’d quibble with the “gravitational pull,” bit, as I worry sometimes that the tribal associations that people attach to the forms of our Rite may be forcing us into closed, uncommunicating and warring factions (there isn’t a lot of overlap between devoted readers of the National Catholic Reporter and The Remnant). I’m not sure whether this is peculiarly American, but I think people get a little “nationalistic” over this, the way people use their political parties, favored media outlets (Fox v. CNN) and other things as bludgeons against their ideological opponents, impugning their patriotism or, in this case, their Catholicity.

      Further, I fear that the coming translations are not going to be handled very well, that there’s going to be very poor catechesis preceding their imposition, and that their imposition will be done as ruthlessly as certain earlier aspects of the reform were said to have been done. I fear that tensions in the American church will get much, much worse before they get better.

      Comment by Dustin — 28 May 2008 @ 11:13 am
    4. I have never subscribed to “America”. If someone sends me the articles, I can look at them.

      Comment by