o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail
LOGIN


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • Statement for WDTPRS from the Spokesperson for H.E. Card. Schönborn
  • Former Sen. Daschle (D-SD) as Sec. of Health and Human Services?
  • 19 Nov. 1863: The Gettysburg Address
  • WSJ on the Synod on Scripture
  • Bp. D'Arcy on the new translation
  • Dominican Rite in Anchorage, Alaska
  • A good view of the Greenville controversy
  • From a priest about the collection for CHD

  • Recent Comments:

    • semperficatholic: The spokesman said, “Those who have dared, tempted by a fragmentary news coverage, to bring...
    • ignorant redneck: My preference is for the Ordinary Form of the Liturgy, solemnly celebrated, with reverence and...
    • Jordanes: Tim H said: If I did not have kids I would kill myself tonight. It was a lie from the beginning. Peter, the...
    • Chris: Chironomo makes great points. And let’s not forget — these politicians are heretics. They’re...
    • Fr Ray Blake: The response would do credit to Dr Goebbels, it is more damaging to the Cardinal’s reputation...
    • chironomo: Robert; How would your distinction of a “self-righteous Catholic” be different from simply a...
    • fr.franklyn mcafee: The bishops should give the name of ONE pro-choice policician they have ‘dialoged’...
    • Chris: So, let me take a shot at this without going down the obvious road with Robert. “Oh, the change is about...
    • Joe: “Think about it: if a priest is willing to intentionally stray from the rubrics of the OF, why would he...
    • tertullian: If you’ve any questions or comments: Prof. Erich Leitenberger e.leitenberger@edw.or.at

  • VOTE!
    My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!

    Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar



    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!






















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner


    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
    • No events.
  • 27 August 2008

    The Hill: GOP demands Pelosi apologize for mangling Catholic teaching

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 1:44 pm

    This article from The Hill was sent by a reader on The Hill:

    GOP demands Pelosi apology for abortion comments

    By Bob Cusack

    Posted: 08/27/08 01:24 PM [ET]

    DENVER —House Republicans are demanding that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) apologize for her recent comments on abortion, saying they “mangle Catholic Church doctrine.”

    The letter comes just a day after Archbishop Donald Wuerl, for the second time in a week, [second time?  Where?  When? What?] slapped down the Speaker’s theological explanation for her support of abortion rights.

    Pelosi, a Catholic, said on Sunday’s edition of “Meet the Press” that the moment of conception has long been an issue of controversy in the Catholic Church. In a highly unusual move, Wuerl publicly corrected Pelosi on doctrine, and New York Archbishop Edward Cardinal Egan said he was “shocked” by her comments.

    Egan said, “What the Speaker had to say about theologians and their positions regarding abortion was not only misinformed; it was also, and especially, utterly incredible in this day and age. ... Anyone who dares to defend that they may be legitimately killed because another human being ‘chooses’ to do so or for any other equally ridiculous reason should not be providing leadership in a civilized democracy worthy of the name.”

    Now, a group of 19 Catholic Republican House members are also expressing their outrage. In a letter sent to Pelosi, they write, “[Y]our erroneous claim about the history of the Church’s opposition to abortion is false and denigrates our common Faith.

    They point out that in 1679, the Church unequivocally said it is in “an error for Catholics to believe fetuses do not have a soul.”

    The Republicans’ letter concludes, “To reduce the scandal and consternation caused amongst the faithful by your remarks, we necessarily write to you to correct the public record and affirm the Church’s actual and historical teaching that defends the sanctity of human life. We hope that you will rectify your errant claims and apologize for misrepresenting the Church’s doctrine and misleading fellow Catholics.”

    Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly issued a statement Tuesday in which the Speaker stood by her comments. He said that not all Catholics believe that life begins at conception and cited St. Augustine, who said, "The law does not provide that the act [abortion] pertains to homicide, for there cannot yet be said to be a live soul in a body that lacks sensation."

    Wuerl blasted Pelosi’s statement, saying the “philosophical discussion of St. Augustine’s time is not relevant today.” [Not sure about that.  I think it is entirely relevant.  What Augustine has to say is helpful and we haven’t, I suspect, gotten to the bottom of what he was really struggling with… but I’ll get to that eventually.  What is important is that Augustine’s teachings are not the equivalent of the modern Magisterium.]

    In his statement, Daly also said, “The Speaker agrees with the Church that we should reduce the number of abortions. She believes that can be done by making family planning more available, as well as by increasing the number of comprehensive age-appropriate sex education and caring adoption programs.”  [That is greater distribution of contraceptives, most of which are abortifacients and also of invasive sex-education.  Speaker Pelosi should review The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality.]

    Asked for comment on the House Republican letter, Daly referred to Tuesday’s statement.

    The GOP members who signed the letter are: Thaddeus McCotter (Mich.), John Boehner (Ohio), Steve Chabot (Ohio), Virginia Foxx (N.C.), Phil Gingrey (Ga.), Peter King (N.Y.), Steve King (Iowa), Daniel Lungren (Calif.), Devin Nunes (Calif.), John Sullivan (Okla.), Patrick Tiberi (Ohio), Phil English (Pa.), Jean Schmidt (Ohio), Jim Walsh (N.Y.), Jeff Fortenberry (Neb.), Michael McCaul (Texas), Paul Ryan (Wis.), Walter Jones (N.C.) and Mike Ferguson (N.J.).

    • • • • • •

    57 Comments

    1. Thanks, Fr. Z., for keeping us so well informed. What would we do without you and your wonderful commentaries! Perhaps it takes some extreme idiotic statement from the Speaker of the House to raise the ire of our Prelates to finally speak out. I’m glad some in the GOP have joined
      the ranks to discredit Nancy Pelosi’s ignorant statement. I think we should buy her the books, Biology 101, as well as the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Evidently she’s never studied them.

      Comment by fortradition — 27 August 2008 @ 2:00 pm
    2. I’d rather the GOP stay out of this. This is not a partisan issue, and we don’t want it to become one.

      Pelosi has picked a fight with the Church. She would love to turn it into a fight with the GOP.

      Comment by Fr Martin Fox — 27 August 2008 @ 2:02 pm
    3. “GOP demands Pelosi apology for abortion comments”

      As though the One True Church needs their defense.

      Comment by Christopher Mandzok — 27 August 2008 @ 2:15 pm
    4. Will the GOP apologize for mangling Church teaching at the times when they needed to do so to suit their purposes? I’m not defending Pelosi, I’m just sayin’...

      Comment by Michael E. Lawrence — 27 August 2008 @ 2:15 pm
    5. Good point Fr Fox. One needs the patience of St Monica, no? I noticed missing from the list is Chris Smith, (Rep, NJ) who always seems to have a good head on his shoulders.

      Perhaps not for the politicians, but for those Catholics who mistakenly think it is possible in good faith to support the dems it’s a hard case. To me, and in some cases, though obviously not all, it is an error of judgement, not of a definitive intention to go against the church. Somehow we need to reach them

      Comment by johnny — 27 August 2008 @ 2:18 pm
    6. You are so right, Fr. Fox. This is not a partisan issue, as is evidenced by the wonderful news that just today, 8-27-08, all 114 Catholic Democrat members of the United States House of Representatives have joined in unison to denounce Ms. Pelosi for her recent statements on abortion which run contrary to Catholic teaching. Fabulous news, indeed. No partisanship whatsoever.

      Comment by toomey — 27 August 2008 @ 2:27 pm
    7. The journalist says that the GOP is “demanding” an apology. In reality, a group of Catholic congressmen/women who happen to be all Republicans are correcting someone we all know to have made incorrect statements. Am I saying it’s entirely nonpartisan? Of course not. But it is also unfair to say that these House Republicans are acting solely on behalf of their party rather than their Church.

      And, let’s face it: unfortunately, Pelosi & co. WILL respond to political criticism. They could obviously care less what the Church thinks of them, considering their blatant disregard for Her doctrine.

      Comment by Lucia — 27 August 2008 @ 2:29 pm
    8. That it only seems to be GOP members of Congress indicates how deeply beholden to the Abortion Industry the Democrats in Congress, especially the nominally Catholic Democrats, have become.

      And, AFAIK, members of the GOP, even Catholic ones, have never misrepresented Church teaching, claimed (heretically) that the misrepresentation was authentic Church teaching, and then proceeded to thumb their noses at anyone who had the Audacity to Correct them.

      Comment by Flambeaux — 27 August 2008 @ 2:37 pm
    9. Re: Father Fox’s belief that Ms. Pelosi has picked a fight with the Church (alone) is short-sighted. The Dem’s have supported abortion rights