o{]:)

Fr. Z is also Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the (now dormant) ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z is available for retreats and conferences.

* E-MAIL
* TWITTER: @fatherz
LOGIN or REGISTER




VOTE!

My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • PODCAzT 94: PART II - 40 years ago... Paul VI on the eve of the Novus Ordo
  • If you liked the communion host PEZ dispenser, your gonna flip over this!
  • 10-14 December - Vancouver
  • Bosnian Card. Puljic denies claims of Vatican commission about Medjugorje
  • Anglican Archbp. Williams to Rome: set aside issue of female bishops
  • A sensible diocesan speakers/awards policy
  • Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) vaporizes Att. Gen. Eric Holder
  • 19 Nov 1863: The Gettysburg Address

  • Recent Comments:


  • The Z-Cam in the Sabine Chapel is ON AIR!Z-Cam and Radio Sabina: LIVE

    Visit the WDTPRS Stores!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar

    July 2009
    S M T W T F S
    « Jun   Aug »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  


    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK





    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent

    Thanks for the support!

    2009 Catholic New Media Awards Winner

    * Best Blog by a Cleric
    * Best Written Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * People's Choice Blog
    * Best Podcast by a Cleric
    * Best Podcast by a Man
    * Best Podcast by a Religious
    * Best Produced Podcast
    * Best Video Podcast
    * Funniest Podcast
    * Most Entertaining Podcast
    * Most Informative Podcast
    * Most Spiritual Podcast
    * People's Choice Podcast
    * Best Overall Catholic Website


    2008 Weblog Awards Winner

    2007 Weblog Awards Winner



    * Best Apologetic Blog
    * Best blog by Clergy
    * Best Individual Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * Best Insider News Blog
    * Smartest Blog
    * Most Spiritual Blog
    * Best Written Blog




    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    Fr. Z's Facebook page



    TwitterCounter for

    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
  • Buy Fr. Z a cup of coffee!





    Your support makes it possible for me to continue with this blog.




    My November goal...






    4 July 2009

    Archbp. John Caroll’s Prayer for Government

    CATEGORY: Classic Posts, The future and our choices — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 11:27 am

    The following prayer was composed by John Carroll, Archbishop of Baltimore, in 1791. He was the first bishop appointed for the United States in 1789 by Pope Pius VI. He was made the first archbishop when his see of Baltimore was elevated to the status of an archdiocese.

    John was a cousin of Charles Carroll of Maryland, a signer of the Declaration of Independence.

    Americans among the readership might print it and bring it to your parish priests and ask them to use it after Mass on national holidays.

    This needs no translation for Catholics who love their country!

    PRAYER FOR GOVERNMENT

    We pray, Thee O Almighty and Eternal God! Who through Jesus Christ hast revealed Thy glory to all nations, to preserve the works of Thy mercy, that Thy Church, being spread through the whole world, may continue with unchanging faith in the confession of Thy Name. We pray Thee, who alone art good and holy, to endow with heavenly knowledge, sincere zeal, and sanctity of life, our chief bishop, Pope Benedict, the Vicar of Our Lord Jesus Christ, in the government of his Church; our own bishop, N., all other bishops, prelates, and pastors of the Church; and especially those who are appointed to exercise amongst us the functions of the holy ministry, and conduct Thy people into the ways of salvation. We pray Thee O God of might, wisdom, and justice! Through whom authority is rightly administered, laws are enacted, and judgment decreed, assist with Thy Holy Spirit of counsel and fortitude the President of these United States, that his administration may be conducted in righteousness, and be eminently useful to Thy people over whom he presides; by encouraging due respect for virtue and religion; by a faithful execution of the laws in justice and mercy; and by restraining vice and immorality. Let the light of Thy divine wisdom direct the deliberations of Congress, and shine forth in all the proceedings and laws framed for our rule and government, so that they may tend to the preservation of peace, the promotion of national happiness, the increase of industry, sobriety, and useful knowledge; and may perpetuate to us the blessing of equal liberty. We pray for his excellency, the governor of this state , for the members of the assembly, for all judges, magistrates, and other officers who are appointed to guard our political welfare, that they may be enabled, by Thy powerful protection, to discharge the duties of their respective stations with honesty and ability. We recommend likewise, to Thy unbounded mercy, all our brethren and fellow citizens throughout the United States, that they may be blessed in the knowledge and sanctified in the observance of Thy most holy law; that they may be preserved in union, and in that peace which the world cannot give; and after enjoying the blessings of this life, be admitted to those which are eternal. Finally, we pray to Thee, O Lord of mercy, to remember the souls of Thy servants departed who are gone before us with the sign of faith and repose in the sleep of peace; the souls of our parents, relatives, and friends; of those who, when living, were members of this congregation, and particularly of such as are lately deceased; of all benefactors who, by their donations or legacies to this Church, witnessed their zeal for the decency of divine worship and proved their claim to our grateful and charitable remembrance. To these, O Lord, and to all that rest in Christ, grant, we beseech Thee, a place of refreshment, light, and everlasting peace, through the same Jesus Christ, Our Lord and Savior. Amen.

    • • • • • •

    QUAERITUR: Fr. Z steps on the 3rd rail - noisy children at Mass

    CATEGORY: ASK FATHER Question Box, Classic Posts, SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 11:21 am

    I haven’t stepped on the third rail for a little while, so… why not today, with a burst of fireworks.

    This question about children at Mass comes via e-mail:

    I enjoy your blog immensely. Thank you for your hard work. And Happy year of the priest :) I have a question about children in mass. Our priest told us it would be better to leave our children at home and have my husband and I go to separate masses so we can get more out of mass.

    I love going to morning mass with my little ones and now feel as if he thinks I should not be there at all with them.

    Is it better to go separately?

    My feeling has always been that seeing and participating as a family unit was beneficial and that waiting until they have received first communion to bring them to mass was a loss of years of worshiping (at their own level) the holy sacrifice of the mass

    Here goes!  (I can smell the burning and hear the buzzing ZZZZZAP already!)

    You don’t specify how old your children are, but I am guessing that none of this would have come up if they weren’t of the wiggly or difficult age.

    I note that the priest said one thing and you are now feeling that he thinks something else.  Take him at his word.  He thinks one way would be "better".  He didn’t say that your coming to Mass with children is bad.

    I am sure you love going to Mass with your children.  I am sure that the other daily Mass participants also love going to Mass… with your children.  

    Once upon a time it was not unusual for parents to go to Mass in shifts.  That was certainly easier in the age before urban sprawl in ethnic neighborhoods where it was not impossible to walk to the local parish.  These days, people tend to travel farther for Mass and, simply put, everyone has to go at once.

    Surely we can agree that there are some places and occasions where the presence of very small children is not appropriate – no matter how great we think kids are, blah blah blah.  For example, I think we will agree that two year olds are not good candidates for a recital of Schubert Lieder at the concert hall.  They are not good candidates for the university lecture hall.  They are not good candidates for Charlie Trotter’s in Chicago.

    But, though there are some overlapping characteristics, church is not quite like any of those three situations.

    Next, I am not quite sure how participating as a family at Mass has its own special benefits if … if …a great deal of attention must be paid to the small children who are pretty much oblivious to what is going on anyway. 

    I imagine parents of children will want to chime in on that point and help us out.

    Children learn – at their own level as you say – from the example of their parents and pick up subtle social cues which become part of the deep warp and weft of their worldview. 

    There is always an "on the other hand" in these discussions, isn’t there?

    But back to an important point.  The priest also suggested that you and your husband would get more out of Mass were you not to have to cope with your busy little darlings.  Get that?  You and your husband were the focus of Father’s concern.  That is a legitimate thing to suggest, you know.  And the priest was not saying that it is bad for you to be in church with your kids.  He is saying that you might be able to participate better, be more actively receptive to what is going on at Mass, if your attention wasn’t so divided. 

    And yes, I know that perhaps Father was being subtle and was really suggesting that the kids were too noisy.  But let’s stick to the story as written.

    Some at this point are on the verge of saying "But Father! But Father!", with furrowed brow.  "Priests are supposed to be pro-life!  How can you even suggest that we shouldn’t have all our children all the time in every church!  You hate kids!"

    "Tisk", I reply. 

    I think having children at Mass is fine.  It is especially nice when they are not throwing fits. "On the other hand"... just because Catholics are pro-life that doesn’t mean that everyone should always have to share the agony and ecstasy of you handling your children during Mass.

    Digression: I imagine most parents are truly concerned, anxious even, that their children not bother other people in church.  That must be – as I imagine – a real strain on one’s ability to focus on anything else.   And, even though we know that a parent still, in a way, participates at Mass when at a certain decibel level he or she takes the little darling outside, that is hardly the best way to participate.

    While I am rambling... some people who don’t have children, or haven’t had little ones for many years, might be overly touchy about their personal zones of silence.  It is possible to get used to quiet to the point where noise really irritates.  These folks have to get themselves into a mental place where they can be a bit more tolerant.   One the other hand, it might not be the best choice not to leave when junior is turning purple from the screaming.  Some couples may have a really high tolerance level to noisy children, so that they barely take notice of them… when everyone else in a two block radius are noticing little else.  These people need to get themselves into a mental place where, when they go into church, they remember that they are not at home in their back yard. 

    Consider also this story.

    A baby was howling in the front pew during the sermon and the mother started out of the church with her treasure, passing right in front of the pulpit as she headed for the door.

    The priest wanted to demonstrate how open he was to noisy children at Mass, no matter how distracting they might be.  Father stopped his sermon and said "Please don’t think you have to leave.  The baby doesn’t bother me."

    Over her shoulder the mother shot back, "You’re bothering the baby!"

    Yes, it is possible that, at times, parents are not entirely aware of the effect of their little bundles of love on others in the church.  I have met people who were pretty self-absorbed with their children. Therefore, it might not be the very best choice to sit in the front pew, far from the door

    A little kid noise in church isn’t going to disturb people very much – including the parents of the squeaker.  But there are limits, right?

    In sum, your priest is probably right.  You could get more out of Mass by not having to deal with your children all the time.  Still, this may not be a practical solution.  If you think Father was really hinting at something else, perhaps you should ask the priest if someone complained or if he himself had a concern.  Don’t wonder or imagine why he made the comment.  If it wasn’t clear to you what he was saying, ask him nicely. 

    I will now drag my cripsy fried body to the edge of the tracks to wait for the next train to run me over with a resounding crunch.

    • • • • • •

    Fr. Sirico about dissenters and the upcoming “social” encyclical

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:58 am

    You might inoculate yourself against some of the foolishness of the lefties on the upcoming "social"encyclical of Pope Benedict with this piece by Fr. Robert Sirico from the site National Review Online.

    My emphases and comments.

    The Divine Economy: On the New Papal Encylical    [Rev. Robert A. Sirico]

    On Tuesday, Pope Benedict XVI will release his first social encyclical, Caritas in Veritate. The pre-release buzz from the Catholic Left on each of his two previous encyclicals has so far proven wrong each time, [Sr. Chittister and Fr. Reese are cases in point.] so the rule should be to wait and see what the pope will actually say.

    Each time, with previous encyclicals, we have been told that the pope is preparing to lambaste capitalism and call for state measures to heavily regulate it with an eye to redistributing wealth, cleaning up the environment, controlling consumption, etc. Each time, the final text has demonstrated that the pope’s conversion to progressivist causes has been greatly exaggerated. Invariably, his arguments have been highly sophisticated and have defied easy political categorization.

    In advance of Caritas in Veritate, Catholic “progressives” are working themselves into a frenzy of predictions, recommendations, and anathemas — and not one of them, to my knowledge, has seen even an early draft of the encyclical which has been two years in the making. [And revision too, I believe.]

    Will the document draw attention to the weaknesses of Western-style capitalist systems? One hopes so. [Because, clearly, there is room for improvement.] We might expect the pope to call on market forces to be regulated by moral concerns, within a strong juridical framework, and an exogenous apparatus of standards to curb excesses.

    [Q] But here is the operative question: In what sense would such a call be a blow against the idea of free economic institutions? [A] The short answer is that it will not be.

    There are few advocates of market economics who advocate a complete lack of regulation rightly understood. Every transaction in the marketplace is in fact regulated by contract law, reputation, industry standards, competition, certification and monitoring, and profit and loss systems that reward prudence and punish excess over the long term. [There must be rule of law and some regulation so that people can trust that the agreements they enter into will be honored.  If not, trade is very difficult indeed.]

    Do these need strengthening? Certainly, and it should be noted that a main force for weakening them is not the market as such, but partisan interventions in the market.

    Consider the drive for ever-lower interest rates as one of many examples. [Which just drives up borrowing.] This is a subsidy for excess because it encourages borrowing [yep] at the expense of saving. If Benedict writes of the need for greater prudence and caution in economic affairs, permitting interest rates to rise to a market level would go a long way toward achieving that[NB: Fr. Sirico is not saying that this is what Pope Benedict is going to say.]

    Will the pope overtly call for a global, centralized, state-based management of economic systems about which would-be central planners have long dreamed? I would be very surprised. This is a man who has stood firm against every form of statist control of society. As his first encyclical, Deus Caritas Est, illustrated, he has a deep attachment to subsidiarity as an essential principle for a free and good society, and I would be amazed to see him give up his love for liberty because the concern of the moment is economics.

    But details aside, it is good to step back a moment and reflect on what Catholic social teaching is and what it is not, so that in studying the new encyclical, we gain a deeper appreciation of its intent and scope.

    [Pay attention…] Since 1870, the papacy has explicitly claimed to exercise the charisma of infallibility in the very area that "progressives" — “dissenters” is a more accurate word — have labored to dilute and “episcopalianize” for 40 years: faith and morals. In fact, Catholic progressives will find themselves on the horns of an intolerable ecclesiological dilemma no matter what the contents of the document. [I am reminded of the mordent comment of the late Fr. Neuhaus that the purpose of episcopalianism was to make irony redundant.]

    On the one hand (doctrine, liturgy, and sexual morality), progressives tend to take dissenting positions from defined and binding Church teaching. On the other hand (economic and social policy), they want to boast of the Church’s "best kept secret," especially to the extent that they think it coheres with any number of secular-left platforms, while ignoring those aspects of Catholic social teaching that clearly don’t fit the leftist nostrums.  [They want it both ways.  Ignore these teachings, but pay attention to these (ours).]

    It is quite a spectacle to see Catholic progressives — who in other circumstances contort themselves into exegetical pretzels when they want to undermine clear, emphatic, authoritative, and repeated magisterial prohibitions on same-sex relations, female “priests,” and contraceptive acts — morph into virtual Ultramontanists on prudential matters such as the precise level of a minimum wage[Bravo.  Well said.]

    Let us be clear: The Church explicitly makes no such claims of infallibility on those policy matters that it considers a matter for prudential judgment (i.e., most policy issues) but allows for Catholics to hold a variety of viewpoints on such questions such as the exact size of the state’s share of the economy. [This is exactly what I am talking about all the time in my critique of the Kmiec/Jenkins/Chittister Catholics.  People are free to disagree about solutions to many social ills, about contingent moral judgements.  There are, on the other hand, teachings about which Catholics are not free to disagree.]  Clearly no Catholic can be an anarchist or a communist — but there is a lot of room for prudential disagreement within these parameters. Benedict XVI has followed the model of John Paul II in saying that the Church has no infallible model of political economy to impose on the world. The Church’s social teaching is not, as John Paul stated, a “third way.”

    Further, as pointed out by my friend Michael Novak, the word capitalism is being thrown around in reckless ways these days. Citing Fr. Thomas Reese, S.J., whom Novak charmingly calls “one of our most reliable leftist bellwethers,” in an article in the Washington Post, [here.] Novak shows how such thinkers don’t even know what modern capitalism is. 

    Fr. Reese asks, "If they think that Obama is a socialist, what will they think of Benedict after the encyclical?" and prophesies, "Conservatives will be shocked and disappointed by the encyclical, which will reflect Benedict’s skepticism toward unbridled capitalism based on greed."

    I am not sure who such conservative defenders of "unbridled capitalism based on greed" are supposed to be. Perhaps Fr. Reese has the disciples of the atheist Ayn Rand in mind, but they are hardly representative of those modern defenders of the market economy such as Rocco Buttiglione, Wilhelm Röpke, and William F. Buckley. I think it is a fair prediction to say that any pope would come out against any system "based on greed." Erecting fictions about capitalism and its defenders — and then criticizing them [i.e., straw man arguments] — might take you a long way in the bubble of the Georgetown Faculty Lounge, but that hardly constitutes a serious argument.

    — Father Robert A. Sirico is president and co-founder of the Acton Institute.

    Okay!

    Get ready for another battle of the Acton-Bots and the Distribu-Cons!

    ___________

    UPDATE 4 July 2305 GMT:

    The author of the article, Fr. Sirico, chimes in, below, in the comments.

     

    • • • • • •

    YOUR NEW TLM announcements

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:24 am

    From time to time it seems like this blog is the cyber version of a campus telephone pole.  People want me to post their announcements.

    I like good "brick by brick" news, and when time and other things permit I will happily help out.

    But since this blog is not, in fact, the campus telephone pole, here is an entry where you can do that.

    What are your NEW TLM announcements?

    • • • • • •

    Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - RESULTS

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:02 am

    The results of the Catholic New Media Awards for 2009 have been released.

    Many thanks to everyone who gave your support!  And kudos to all the other blogs and podcasters out there!  We must all help each other!

    WDTPRS made a good showing in quite a few calendars.

    • Best Blog by a Cleric
    • Best Blog by a Religious
    • Best Written Blog
    • Most Informative Blog
    • People’s Choice Blog
    • Best New Podcast
    • Best Podcast by a Cleric
    • Best Podcast by a Man
    • Best Podcast by a Religious
    • Best Produced Podcast
    • Best Video Podcast
    • Funniest Podcast
    • Most Entertaining Podcast
    • Most Informative Podcast
    • Most Spiritual Podcast
    • People’s Choice Podcast
    • Best Overall Catholic Website

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress